>casting the ultimate charisma void nepo baby as the lead
Not sure what they're expecting here. This isn't a Nolan film so it's not just going to print money and he was easily the worst part of Tenet.
>Like nolan casted him by his own will
he was impossed by the studio because of Dunkirk flop. Just see how he went to universal to make a film with the less amount of Black folks and women as possible right afterwards
>That was Oppenheimer
which came out after dunkirk. at the time of dunkirk’s release, it was the highest grossing ww2 movie ever >and Dunkirk wasn’t WW2.
amerifat hands typed this post
>ust see how he went to universal to make a film with the less amount of Black folks and women as possible right afterwards
Learn to speak our language before you post here, shitskin.
I'd be more inclined to give a frick about the robots if they had square heads and headlights for eyes as opposed to just looking like ugly people with prosthetics
I'd be happy to see an original sci-fi IP but the plot here of "WHAT IF THE MACHINES ARE THE SAME AS US" seems so fricking boring and rote that I can't say I'm excited for this.
>No normal looking guy for me to relate to
>No hot girl with a sexy body for me to look at
Not gonna watch it.
Nah TND
>casting the ultimate charisma void nepo baby as the lead
Not sure what they're expecting here. This isn't a Nolan film so it's not just going to print money and he was easily the worst part of Tenet.
>Like nolan casted him by his own will
he was impossed by the studio because of Dunkirk flop. Just see how he went to universal to make a film with the less amount of Black folks and women as possible right afterwards
>he was impossed by the studio because of Dunkirk flop.
Dunkirk was a success
it was a flop in Warner's books
It was the highest grossing WW2 movie ever made and was nominated for 8 Oscars. How would it possibly be considered a flop?
That was Oppenheimer and Dunkirk wasn’t WW2.
Dunkirk is WWII. It happened really early.
>That was Oppenheimer
which came out after dunkirk. at the time of dunkirk’s release, it was the highest grossing ww2 movie ever
>and Dunkirk wasn’t WW2.
amerifat hands typed this post
Look up Hollywood Accounting. LOTR never made a single penny.
You're out of your mind.
He’s right, the studio israelite’d the tolkien estate out of millions by saying the movies weren’t profitable.
>ust see how he went to universal to make a film with the less amount of Black folks and women as possible right afterwards
Learn to speak our language before you post here, shitskin.
Seriously how the frick did Denzels son inherit NONE of his charisma and talent?
He was good in tenet
I'd be more inclined to give a frick about the robots if they had square heads and headlights for eyes as opposed to just looking like ugly people with prosthetics
what's going on here?
he’s looking ZESTY
doing tealcguy impression
>IT HAS AN AFRICAN AMERICAN IN THE POSTER, IT CAN'T FAIL
>nooo don't raceswap characters make your own OC!
>...
>nooo are you trying to replace us?
i ate most of my m&m's that were meant for Mission Impossible during this trailer as a coping mechanism.
Fatty
I’m definitely seeing it opening weekend.
Looks like they want to appeal to vietnam and nigerian markets. I hope this risky gamble pays off for them.
I'd be happy to see an original sci-fi IP but the plot here of "WHAT IF THE MACHINES ARE THE SAME AS US" seems so fricking boring and rote that I can't say I'm excited for this.
What if machines are actually writing the scripts for these movies, trying to make you feel more sympathetic to them?