This is a good movie, but it's not as technically impressive as say, Pinocchio.

This is a good movie, but it's not as technically impressive as say, Pinocchio.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I disagree. You’re saying 9.5/10 technical visuals aren’t as impressive as a 10/10.

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I get what you are saying but this movie pioneered the tecniques that Pinocchio perfected, so give it props for that.
    Also, if you are going to watch this or Pinocchio, get a Domesday rip of the Laserdisc since those have the least alterations.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What? Didn't know they had been altered.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Most Disney movies get altered after the fact. Hell, even movies like Lilo and Stitch get censored on home release for ridiculous reasons.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      what kinda alterations?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        To quote from TV Tropes:

        >Rather than being direct re-scans of the master negatives, these releases are instead rotoscoped and recomposited frame-by-frame, color-corrected, and DVNR'd to remove any semblance of age — right down to the film grain. While this ambition is impressive in and of itself, the result is that each movie looks as if it's imitating the "look" of a digitally-animated film, and said imitation is a poor one at that, with finer details and entire pieces of linework being scrubbed away in the process of this visual pseudo-modernization.
        Here is also a Thread that explains the process and its problems; https://nitter.net/stephen_duignan/status/988445621945323520

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Huh, that does look pretty bad. Do you happen to know where online might one find the earlier versions?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Some of the DVDs have lower bitrate, but contain the grain and detail.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              What I'm saying though is where online can you find a rip of that specifically? A quick look through the normal torrent sites showed the earliest file being a 2003 DVD xVid, nothing for the 1999 DVD and especially not the laserdisc. If people care about preserving these versions surely the files exist somewhere online, correct?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Go to Laserdisc Databases, if you want Anime LD for either Video or Audio use nyaa dot si and every release of Seed of Might or what they reccomend, they even have an uncompressed Stereo Audio from Akira's LD that better reflects the Original Run in theaters audio of the Film.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Thanks, lddb seems to just have info and a marketplace though, I'm not really interested in starting a laserdisc collection, I just want to see what that version looks like.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Apparently they listened
          https://nitter.net/stephen_duignan/status/1640872426589286400#m

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    There was nothing even remotely on this level of animation at an earlier point in history.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Almost a century late and it still looks great

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I wonder, did any original audio ever exist for that second scene?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        My guess is that they are placeholders, but I have no idea.

        Didn't Disney almost go bankrupt making this thing?

        Kind of, yeah. They had to take out a loan, so you could quite surely describe it as an all-in gamble. Disney was obviously already well known by the mid 30s, but people very reasonably had doubts that they could do it for an entire 1:20 hours. But the movie being a success story is very nice. Even looking past how lavish/ambitious the animation and music is for the time, I think it still stands as one of the most solid and well-executed movies of the 30s.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Holy frick, if I were the animators I would be pissed this got cut, so much work and talent unused. I've never seen fully animated deleted scenes like this in any other animated movie, I guess they learned their lesson.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        There's more animation that went unused in the final version.

        There's also cut content that didn't get animated but exist in art none the less

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The impressive feat is the fact that it exists in the first place. It was made to prove that you can make a feature length cartoon. Not keeping it to 8 minute shorts and singalongs.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't Disney almost go bankrupt making this thing?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      And it paid off

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Funny how almost all their landmark movies happen when they're about to go bankrupt.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Snow White, Pinocchio, Fantasia
    Perfect trilogy. The greatest opening trio from any animation film studio.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Castle in the Sky, Grave of the Fireflies, My Neighbour Totoro
      Not even the opening trio of Ghibli is on par.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I like that the first 5 feature-films by Disney are all in the library of congress. The golden age is my favorite era.

      >Castle in the Sky, Grave of the Fireflies, My Neighbour Totoro
      Not even the opening trio of Ghibli is on par.

      >Grave of the Fireflies, My Neighbour Totoro
      Those 2 movies came out on the same day. What a day that must've been.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *