>both inside and outside of the United States, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice experienced a notable poor Friday-to-Sunday hold and set a new record for the worst Friday-to-Sunday drop for a superhero movie release in modern box office history with a 58% decline, which was previously held by 2015's Fantastic Four.
>In its second weekend, it experienced a "historic" box-office drop, with an 81.2% decline on Friday that was "one of the biggest Friday-to-Friday drops any blockbuster has ever seen", and an overall 68.4% drop for the weekend despite not "facing any big competition at the box office"
>the film needed to reach $800 million in revenue at the box office to "recoup its investment" according to financial analysts. Despite surpassing this amount, it was considered "a disappointment" for failing to reach $1 billion.
>On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 29% based on 437 reviews and an average rating of 5/10.
>Lindy West in The Guardian described the film as "153 minutes of a grown man whacking two dolls together"
>A. O. Scott of The New York Times wrote: "The point of Batman v Superman isn't fun, and it isn't thinking, either. It's obedience. The theology is invoked [...] to buttress a spectacle of power. And in that way the film serves as a metaphor for its own aspirations. The corporations that produce movies like this one, and the ambitious hacks who sign up to make them, have no evident motive beyond their own aggrandizement."
>film director Kevin Smith, a long-time friend and collaborator of Affleck, praised Affleck's performance but panned the film, commenting that it "didn't really have a heart" and was "humorless", arguing that "there seems to be a fundamental lack of understanding of what those characters are about.
>Mike Stoklasa of Redlettermedia described his viewing of the film as “attending a funeral”
Most of these complaints read >there weren't any quips, so it's bad
Which is pretty insipid. That award section is pretty baffling as well. It's OK to dislike the film, but pretending for Eisenbergs performance to have been bad is just downright silly. It's impossible to take anybody who makes this claim seriously.
>A. O. Scott of The New York Times wrote: "The point of Batman v Superman isn't fun, and it isn't thinking, either.
This guy doesn't even understand what film was initially intended to be. He's completely ignorant of the phenemonological elements that define the medium he chooses to critique. Instead he expects to be taught, to have a moral lesson to latch on to. This isn't a film critic, it's an opinion piece writer who projects their own expectations onto whatever it is they happen to watch.
It's funny because Sneeder is not exactly a right wing guy and BvS was somewhat of a left wing movie and as a non-leftoid, it felt so much better watching BvS's themes than watching what other progressives do when they try to put their message into their movies.
DCEU should've just started with the Justice League being established from the beginning. Building up to it just led to Marvel comparisons but at the same time they wanted to hurry up and get to the big crossover events so you ended up with the worst of both worlds.
I said this when they announced BvS, and everyone replied with the same bullshit "nooo, they need one movie for each character and then a movie for JLA, and then a new row of movies with other characters and then JLA 2". the MCU has rotted the midwit brain. initially I didn't even want a DCEU, just a MOS trilogy would be great
That shit at the end with the coffin and the dirt was very gay. X-Men already did something like it ages before that movie (The Last Stand when Magneto nudges a chess piece), and it's undoubtedly been done before that too. It just felt cheap and pandering. Like "OH DON'T WORRY GUYS SUPERMAN WILL BE BACK" it's not like he's the major fricking draw to DC and they would never kill him off permanently. Even DC Comics couldn't find the will to off him forever.
That shit at the end with the coffin and the dirt was very gay. X-Men already did something like it ages before that movie (The Last Stand when Magneto nudges a chess piece), and it's undoubtedly been done before that too. It just felt cheap and pandering. Like "OH DON'T WORRY GUYS SUPERMAN WILL BE BACK" it's not like he's the major fricking draw to DC and they would never kill him off permanently. Even DC Comics couldn't find the will to off him forever.
The dirt is to show that Superman's sacrifice lifted people up in a metaphorical sense. It is a callback to the opening where the bats lift up kid Bruce Wayne.
no one has explained how a fricking iron man suit is going to be any help against Superman. he could just crush that shit if he wanted. and if batman is going to dope supes with kryptonite, he doesn't need a suit, he just needs a kryptonite shank. he could have ruined supes the first time he gassed him.
i mean i liked that movie but the fight with superman makes zero fricking sense. even his motivations are poorly mapped. surely a guy as smart as bruce might suspect he's getting played.
>no one has explained how a fricking iron man suit is going to be any help against Superman
if you need explanation for something like that, you already lost and will never gonna make it. stick to video games
why would he expect to be flown through walls? flying someone through a wall is a pretty poor way to fight someone when they're armored. don't they know modern construction methods are basically stick and paper?
i mean, there's no way he could account for superman, since superman is extremely overpowered and can basically punch a hole through the earth if he really wants to. he's so fricking OP it hurts. so trying to have a contingency plan on superman, in any way that isn't DIRECTLY involving kryptonite, is a waste of time. it would have only made sense if he actually plated or infused the armor with kryptonite, therefore making it impossible for superman to kill him without hurting himself, perhaps mortally. you can have had all the drama of the superman impaling himself WITHOUT having a big dumb stupid monster that looks cheap as hell. you can have all the drama invoked between batman and superman directly; there is no need for reconciliation; batman v superman did not need a happy ending. honestly i think it would have been measurable improved if it was just full-bore homeric tragedy of batman and superman, the core of justice league, trying to kill each other in earnest.
there's a version of this movie where no one mentions martha. it's probably better.
homie the geography of the fight, based on where they start and where the spear is, it would be very easy to guess they would get there by flying through walls or something similar. besides he probably already had an iron man suit anyway and even if he didn't(i don't remember) making one is not really a big deal to him
>fight starts with batman laying into superman, really pounding his shit with kryptonite knuckles >superman takes it trying to reason with bruce. >eventually loses his shit after failing to treaty, returns fire, starts tearing at the armor in what is portrayed as agonizing pain, superman in turmoil >superman dies; bruce is victorious, but finds no peace, realizes superman was not the enemy. >eventually uncovers the web of lies laid by luthor that led him to the wrong conclusions, because batman being faked out by the mainstream media is gay. >don't tease the superman return; it makes the events in justice league vis a vis superman's return from the dead SLIGHTLY less stupid and uninspired. i'd argue that pushing that reveal the road and doing a slate of hero-specific films without superman would be the ideal scenario. but snyder had to make justice league. and his cut is still a bad, overly long movie.
>why would he expect to be flown through walls?
he knew superman isn't directly a killer and fancy's himself a savior, he knew supes would go easy on batman and try to 'scare' him with some of the hardest punches he'd ever faced in his life. then he could catch him off guard with the kryptonite gas, something supes wouldnt expect since k-rock is usually in solid form. batman, and the writers, did exactly what a farm boy from kansas wouldn't have thought of. all thanks to Lex of course.
>since k-rock is usually in solid form
Superman hadnt been exposed to kryptonite before that point anyway so he couldve just made a kryptoknife and gutted him like a fish when he got close
Ya know at first I didnt like Cavill for the role but now I see him as being the perfect fit. Maybe in 10 years ill think the same thing about this new gay but until then i still think picrel is the real deal
cavill is perfect because he has a bizarre phenotype that makes him look otherworldly. usually guys that ripped look like they've been to prison or some shit.
>unzips pants >she laughs uncontrollably >Are all the penises on this planet that small?
if you raped her you'd be a moron, since in these situations she will inevitable get her powers back and proceed to ruin your shit. the smart move is help her out and hope she is honorable. i believe she is based on the movie so i'm going with that.
I mean you could just kill her afterward, or before. I wouldn't trust that b***h to spare me. She'd see it as a sign of weakness and kill me as a "mercy".
if you raped her you'd be a moron, since in these situations she will inevitable get her powers back and proceed to ruin your shit. the smart move is help her out and hope she is honorable. i believe she is based on the movie so i'm going with that.
It's funny how you look at Snyder and think he's just a dumb dudebro but in reality he's a thoughtful auteur pushing the bounds and elevating superhero movies into something we didn't think possible.
I don't even understand why you guys want a Knightmare movie. A film where Jared Leto would have a massive supporting role? Frick that shit. How any of you convinced yourselves he was good in that JL scene I'll never know
People on here either love a movie and everything in it or hate it and everything in it, to admit there's something good or bad is to admit your overall opinion is wrong
They made the Snydercut canon in Flash. He talks to Bruce about how he time travelled on Russia and how Iris met Flash a few years before. Ah well. All over now
Even if the ending was Darkseid's armada literally boomtubing above metropolis and vaporizing the daily planet, I still wouldnt see it in theaters, frick WB for how they handled this whole thing
Again, frick WB
>LOTR of capeshit
snyder"chads" are so fricking dumb. Snyder's trilogy is the Prequels for capeshit, collapsing disasters made by once-in-a-lifetime auteurs who had all the money to do insanely visionary stuff, paired with hostile response from the audience and critics, finishing with a powerful re-evaluation after they were done. It's also the most unique sequence of films in capeshit simply due to the entire JL situation and how it was handled, there's nothing else like it in that sense.
LOTR is a success story for the ages, the Snyder films are not (and that's what makes them interesting).
>prequels >powerful re-evaluation
My fricking sides. Star Wars fans are literal morons and dumb as shit. The prequels being re-evaluated was zoomers being exposed to prequel memes on reddit over and over until they became conditioned to thinking memes making fun of them made the movies "cinema".
I’d rather have 3 flawed but soulful movies than having some black c**t call out Bruce Wayne’s white privilege. The Batman was just “white guy needs black people to help him be better: the movie”.
you genuinely have to be braindead to actually believe this... baka only in this shithole do snyder schizos feel comfortable enough to spout this shit because no one ridicules them enough
not true, all the capeshit fans i’ve seen are little white boys that are obsessed with whatever trend they tell them will validate their existence and make up for daddy slaving away for israelites and never kissing you on the forehead
Batman Begins mogs every single DCU movie. The script alone is 10x better than anything Snyder made. David Goyer is a proven hack and it's quite clear he was riding Jonathan's coattails.
zack snyder might be a big moron but he is a big moron with experience and know how to make a movie.
His movies are million times better than the flash or any of the other DC films like black adam or shazam
Warner is saving the best for the triumphant revival so with that attotude, you probably won't survive to witness such cinematic greatness. 2030 is go8ng to be miles better.
Literally Batman Forever, even Batman and Robin has more replay value than Man Of Steel which is probably the best of the 3. Lighten up, where'd the fun go? These machines get boring on repeat.
Completely agree.
troll threads go on /b/
True dat
>both inside and outside of the United States, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice experienced a notable poor Friday-to-Sunday hold and set a new record for the worst Friday-to-Sunday drop for a superhero movie release in modern box office history with a 58% decline, which was previously held by 2015's Fantastic Four.
>In its second weekend, it experienced a "historic" box-office drop, with an 81.2% decline on Friday that was "one of the biggest Friday-to-Friday drops any blockbuster has ever seen", and an overall 68.4% drop for the weekend despite not "facing any big competition at the box office"
>the film needed to reach $800 million in revenue at the box office to "recoup its investment" according to financial analysts. Despite surpassing this amount, it was considered "a disappointment" for failing to reach $1 billion.
>On review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes the film has an approval rating of 29% based on 437 reviews and an average rating of 5/10.
>Lindy West in The Guardian described the film as "153 minutes of a grown man whacking two dolls together"
>A. O. Scott of The New York Times wrote: "The point of Batman v Superman isn't fun, and it isn't thinking, either. It's obedience. The theology is invoked [...] to buttress a spectacle of power. And in that way the film serves as a metaphor for its own aspirations. The corporations that produce movies like this one, and the ambitious hacks who sign up to make them, have no evident motive beyond their own aggrandizement."
>film director Kevin Smith, a long-time friend and collaborator of Affleck, praised Affleck's performance but panned the film, commenting that it "didn't really have a heart" and was "humorless", arguing that "there seems to be a fundamental lack of understanding of what those characters are about.
>Mike Stoklasa of Redlettermedia described his viewing of the film as “attending a funeral”
>b-but midwits didn't like it
Most of these complaints read
>there weren't any quips, so it's bad
Which is pretty insipid. That award section is pretty baffling as well. It's OK to dislike the film, but pretending for Eisenbergs performance to have been bad is just downright silly. It's impossible to take anybody who makes this claim seriously.
>A. O. Scott of The New York Times wrote: "The point of Batman v Superman isn't fun, and it isn't thinking, either.
This guy doesn't even understand what film was initially intended to be. He's completely ignorant of the phenemonological elements that define the medium he chooses to critique. Instead he expects to be taught, to have a moral lesson to latch on to. This isn't a film critic, it's an opinion piece writer who projects their own expectations onto whatever it is they happen to watch.
BvS is legitimately the most politically complex film of the century.
True, its tonal depth is second to none
It's funny because Sneeder is not exactly a right wing guy and BvS was somewhat of a left wing movie and as a non-leftoid, it felt so much better watching BvS's themes than watching what other progressives do when they try to put their message into their movies.
Politics aren't that complex
The political themes in BvS grapples with are complex.
I appreciate how these actually look like real movies. Thank you Snyder.
designed by committee compromised mess
More like the hobit trilogy of capeshit
You are not wrong OP.
man of steel was actually decent for a superhero movie, any potential bvs had was ruined by execs
justice league looked shit from the start tbh
whoever illustrated this spent like two minutes on getting the shadow entirely wrong
BvS felt like 3 movies in one. You could tell how much they wanted to rush to Justice League.
DCEU should've just started with the Justice League being established from the beginning. Building up to it just led to Marvel comparisons but at the same time they wanted to hurry up and get to the big crossover events so you ended up with the worst of both worlds.
I said this when they announced BvS, and everyone replied with the same bullshit "nooo, they need one movie for each character and then a movie for JLA, and then a new row of movies with other characters and then JLA 2". the MCU has rotted the midwit brain. initially I didn't even want a DCEU, just a MOS trilogy would be great
Man of steel was ok until it devolves into mindless action, BvS at no point is good, and I’m not watching ZSJL frick off with that
>There’s parallels this means the film is deep and says something meaningful
Midwit detected
Oh my, the pottery of these high brow motion pictures
this shit is the main reason why marvel > DC
no pretensions just good dumb fun
guardians of the galaxy is great, the rest of the MCU is not even funny
and it still mogs snydershit
>marvel
>good
yes.
Snydershit mogs the entire MCU and I dont care one way or the other
you're joking/ trolling right? I need to know so i can respond appropriately
That shit at the end with the coffin and the dirt was very gay. X-Men already did something like it ages before that movie (The Last Stand when Magneto nudges a chess piece), and it's undoubtedly been done before that too. It just felt cheap and pandering. Like "OH DON'T WORRY GUYS SUPERMAN WILL BE BACK" it's not like he's the major fricking draw to DC and they would never kill him off permanently. Even DC Comics couldn't find the will to off him forever.
these movies are trash and are proof that the mcu really does have a lot of quality
The dirt is to show that Superman's sacrifice lifted people up in a metaphorical sense. It is a callback to the opening where the bats lift up kid Bruce Wayne.
Don't even try, they're morons who will never understand anything that isn't directly spelt out in front of them
Man of Steel
BvS Ultimate Edition
Justice League Sneeder Cut
The perfect trilogy and the only movies in the DC universe that I consider canon
Your comparison is not apt
no one has explained how a fricking iron man suit is going to be any help against Superman. he could just crush that shit if he wanted. and if batman is going to dope supes with kryptonite, he doesn't need a suit, he just needs a kryptonite shank. he could have ruined supes the first time he gassed him.
i mean i liked that movie but the fight with superman makes zero fricking sense. even his motivations are poorly mapped. surely a guy as smart as bruce might suspect he's getting played.
>no one has explained how a fricking iron man suit is going to be any help against Superman
if you need explanation for something like that, you already lost and will never gonna make it. stick to video games
his plan involved getting flown through walls and shit so an armor wasn't a bad idea
why would he expect to be flown through walls? flying someone through a wall is a pretty poor way to fight someone when they're armored. don't they know modern construction methods are basically stick and paper?
i mean, there's no way he could account for superman, since superman is extremely overpowered and can basically punch a hole through the earth if he really wants to. he's so fricking OP it hurts. so trying to have a contingency plan on superman, in any way that isn't DIRECTLY involving kryptonite, is a waste of time. it would have only made sense if he actually plated or infused the armor with kryptonite, therefore making it impossible for superman to kill him without hurting himself, perhaps mortally. you can have had all the drama of the superman impaling himself WITHOUT having a big dumb stupid monster that looks cheap as hell. you can have all the drama invoked between batman and superman directly; there is no need for reconciliation; batman v superman did not need a happy ending. honestly i think it would have been measurable improved if it was just full-bore homeric tragedy of batman and superman, the core of justice league, trying to kill each other in earnest.
there's a version of this movie where no one mentions martha. it's probably better.
homie the geography of the fight, based on where they start and where the spear is, it would be very easy to guess they would get there by flying through walls or something similar. besides he probably already had an iron man suit anyway and even if he didn't(i don't remember) making one is not really a big deal to him
>fight starts with batman laying into superman, really pounding his shit with kryptonite knuckles
>superman takes it trying to reason with bruce.
>eventually loses his shit after failing to treaty, returns fire, starts tearing at the armor in what is portrayed as agonizing pain, superman in turmoil
>superman dies; bruce is victorious, but finds no peace, realizes superman was not the enemy.
>eventually uncovers the web of lies laid by luthor that led him to the wrong conclusions, because batman being faked out by the mainstream media is gay.
>don't tease the superman return; it makes the events in justice league vis a vis superman's return from the dead SLIGHTLY less stupid and uninspired. i'd argue that pushing that reveal the road and doing a slate of hero-specific films without superman would be the ideal scenario. but snyder had to make justice league. and his cut is still a bad, overly long movie.
>why would he expect to be flown through walls?
he knew superman isn't directly a killer and fancy's himself a savior, he knew supes would go easy on batman and try to 'scare' him with some of the hardest punches he'd ever faced in his life. then he could catch him off guard with the kryptonite gas, something supes wouldnt expect since k-rock is usually in solid form. batman, and the writers, did exactly what a farm boy from kansas wouldn't have thought of. all thanks to Lex of course.
>since k-rock is usually in solid form
Superman hadnt been exposed to kryptonite before that point anyway so he couldve just made a kryptoknife and gutted him like a fish when he got close
Ya know at first I didnt like Cavill for the role but now I see him as being the perfect fit. Maybe in 10 years ill think the same thing about this new gay but until then i still think picrel is the real deal
cavill is perfect because he has a bizarre phenotype that makes him look otherworldly. usually guys that ripped look like they've been to prison or some shit.
>Bizarre phenotype
It's called Upper Class British/ English. He is proof of the class difference in Great Britain.
What a bait thread
>haha we pretend that notoriously bad movies are works of art how subversive
Apparently it’s not bait there are entire YouTube channels dedicated to outlining the symbolism in Batman vs Superman
they're mentally ill
>why aren't you guys going along with the groupthink like the rest of us midwits?
Imagine not being able to think for yourself. Sad.
https://thesymbolicworld.com/2020/08/24/the-symbolic-structure-of-movies-batman-v-superman-2016-part-i/
https://thesymbolicworld.com/2020/10/05/the-symbolic-structure-of-movies-batman-v-superman-2016-part-ii/
mmm mommy amazon thighs ughhhhh
Snyderjeets haven't died yet?
>people unironically loving a tonedeaf edgelords wet dream of video game cut scenes stapled to horrible Wiseau-tier drama scenes
Ya'll homies wild, I swear.
MoS and ZSJL are great, but no capeshit will ever top BvS .
legitimately wish this was true.
but it's not. they range from below average to train wreck.
i'm pretty sure if they weren't making fists they could slide their hands right out of there.
dishonest filmmaking right there.
Walk into your bedroom. Find her tied up like this on your bed and completely depowered. Wut do?
Pull out my kryptonite for her pleasure toys
>unzips pants
>she laughs uncontrollably
>Are all the penises on this planet that small?
I mean you could just kill her afterward, or before. I wouldn't trust that b***h to spare me. She'd see it as a sign of weakness and kill me as a "mercy".
if you raped her you'd be a moron, since in these situations she will inevitable get her powers back and proceed to ruin your shit. the smart move is help her out and hope she is honorable. i believe she is based on the movie so i'm going with that.
Free her
Get on my knees
Offer to be her pusy slave
you realize her whole character would find you contemptible and she would almost certainly kill you for being so weak.
Fine whatever
I free her
I hold up a vibrator like pic related
Proceed from there
A good orgasm, is it's own reward.
She can't beat me up
This whole thing where people pretend Snyder, Bay, PWSA etc. are actually good stopped being hip years ago man.
Ooh, sorry, I'm just not gonna say Snydershit is good!
I know, I know, it sucks!
But I'm just not gonna!
A neverending snoozefest? Yeah it's gonna be hard to top these.
Its Zaddykino, to be sure
the hate this movies receive is irrational and suspicious, but they aren't even close to LOTR movies, 7/10 at best
the legacy of these films will be Martha. Next month, next year, and next century. One simple name will be the whole sum of these three films
but for me it's
>the bat is dead
>bury it
>consider it mercy
i hate snyder trannies like you wouldn't believe
dogshit flicks for 14 year olds, midwit manchildren and stinky indians
>dude like what if superman was like jesus
It's funny how you look at Snyder and think he's just a dumb dudebro but in reality he's a thoughtful auteur pushing the bounds and elevating superhero movies into something we didn't think possible.
Amen brother
this is cringe asf you schizos should be laughing at this shit
MoS and BVS are great but JL is meh.
Fr fr
I don't even understand why you guys want a Knightmare movie. A film where Jared Leto would have a massive supporting role? Frick that shit. How any of you convinced yourselves he was good in that JL scene I'll never know
>why you sent a boy wonder...to do a man's job.
Extremely, violently kino
People on here either love a movie and everything in it or hate it and everything in it, to admit there's something good or bad is to admit your overall opinion is wrong
The first one looks like Kylo Ren
>This is the LotR of capeshit
Do not ever compare LotR to that slop Snyder shit out. Kys.
They made Zach Snyder's Justice League non canon and denied us the JL2 and JL3, which should have resolved ghe whole dystopia plot teased in BvS.
They made the Snydercut canon in Flash. He talks to Bruce about how he time travelled on Russia and how Iris met Flash a few years before. Ah well. All over now
Even if the ending was Darkseid's armada literally boomtubing above metropolis and vaporizing the daily planet, I still wouldnt see it in theaters, frick WB for how they handled this whole thing
Again, frick WB
I’ll get topped this afternoon
You're going to have a nice day?
Easily the best superhero movies, alongside with the Dark Knight trilogy & Raimi's Spider-Man, but Snyder's films mog them in terms of depth.
BvS is the best, Snyder Cut is great, and MoS had a lot of potential but is decent as is.
If you think they are bad you are a midwit until proven otherwise
It's capeshit. Watch better movies. It doesn't stack up to even one LOTR movie and you know this deep down so don't compare.
good morning
>LOTR of capeshit
snyder"chads" are so fricking dumb. Snyder's trilogy is the Prequels for capeshit, collapsing disasters made by once-in-a-lifetime auteurs who had all the money to do insanely visionary stuff, paired with hostile response from the audience and critics, finishing with a powerful re-evaluation after they were done. It's also the most unique sequence of films in capeshit simply due to the entire JL situation and how it was handled, there's nothing else like it in that sense.
LOTR is a success story for the ages, the Snyder films are not (and that's what makes them interesting).
the LOTR of capeshit is the Raimi trilogy btw
>prequels
>powerful re-evaluation
My fricking sides. Star Wars fans are literal morons and dumb as shit. The prequels being re-evaluated was zoomers being exposed to prequel memes on reddit over and over until they became conditioned to thinking memes making fun of them made the movies "cinema".
Good morning sirs
Do nor redeem, sir!
I’d rather have 3 flawed but soulful movies than having some black c**t call out Bruce Wayne’s white privilege. The Batman was just “white guy needs black people to help him be better: the movie”.
Yeah it was bullshit how Gordon literally just solved one of the clues with no help, just blurted the answer out
Most moronic batman by far
So you like these shit movies only because batman is treated better and superman was trashed
WE'RE NOT DOING THE DIRECTOR'S CUT SHUFFLE!
Gods imagine this kino instead of that WW slop we got
Lmao no thanks. WW was already bad enough as it was.
you genuinely have to be braindead to actually believe this... baka only in this shithole do snyder schizos feel comfortable enough to spout this shit because no one ridicules them enough
most capeshit fans are latino or indian
not true, all the capeshit fans i’ve seen are little white boys that are obsessed with whatever trend they tell them will validate their existence and make up for daddy slaving away for israelites and never kissing you on the forehead
>will validate their existence and make up for daddy slaving away for israelites and never kissing you on the forehead
nah, I use Cinemaphile for that
all this psuedo intellectual head canon screams of a scrawny bullied white cuck
Most gays who have a snyder hateboner look like that wym
Hey guys, OP here, wrong pic
I would agree with this but TDKR has been ruined by memes for me.
its the memes that elevated the movie for me
Begins is mediocre
Dark Knight is good but massively overrated
Rises is laughably bad
>Begins is mediocre
Batman Begins mogs every single DCU movie. The script alone is 10x better than anything Snyder made. David Goyer is a proven hack and it's quite clear he was riding Jonathan's coattails.
>The script alone is 10x better than anything Snyder made
>I don't have to kill you, but you don't have to not not kill you
If only Snyder had competent writers to work with.
still amazed how WB gave Zack Snyder full control of WB after the failure of Watchmen. What the frick did they expect was going to happen
Watchmen was kino
if you have two digit iq, yes
kys marvel gay
zack snyder might be a big moron but he is a big moron with experience and know how to make a movie.
His movies are million times better than the flash or any of the other DC films like black adam or shazam
completely agree
Nolan's capeshit capeshit>>>>>>>>>>> any other capeshit
and where is raimi capeshit?
gurdians of the galaxy trilogy is superior to all of them but we're not ready to have THAT conversation
based
cringe
does 3 have any mention to what happens in Avengers movies? if yes, the movie is crap and the trilogy is wasted
funny you mention me considering I said this
test
Warner is saving the best for the triumphant revival so with that attotude, you probably won't survive to witness such cinematic greatness. 2030 is go8ng to be miles better.
Literally Batman Forever, even Batman and Robin has more replay value than Man Of Steel which is probably the best of the 3. Lighten up, where'd the fun go? These machines get boring on repeat.