>This movie is great because it is not woke and does not have THE MESSAGE
>This movie is shit because it is woke and has THE MESSAGE
>Blabber long enough for the video to be profitable
>GO AWAY NOW
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
How soft do you have to be to get upset at a cuck homosexual like Drinker
SEETHING
well the groomer scum is too weak to stay men and prey on kids,
so pretty fricking soft
dilate,troony. YWNBAW
Whatever you do, do NOT watch his Star Wars mock trial videos. We're talking Linkara levels of cringe here.
Nah it’ll be fine
This is your brain on 90 IQ.
>This movie is great because it is not woke and does not have THE MESSAGE
>This movie is shit because it is woke and has THE MESSAGE
He's not wrong. Though I don't see the appeal of watching shit you hate then talking about it for hours on youtube
>Though I don't see the appeal of watching shit you hate then talking about it for hours on youtube
getting millions of views and therefore thousands of dollars per video helps I presume
>Though I don't see the appeal of watching shit you hate then talking about it for hours on youtube
Are you seriously on a board that is called "Cinemaphile - Television & Film", and yet you don't understand the fact that a lot of people; who obviously have an interest in media like TV & Movies; enjoy analyzing, dissecting and comparing their components and illustrating/theorizing about what makes them "good" or "bad" as far as narrative-artwork is concerned?
Like, is that really something that's going over your head? Is that really something you can't understand, especially when you're on this board out of ALL possible boards?
>analyzing, dissecting and comparing their components and illustrating/theorizing about what makes them "good" or "bad" as far as narrative-artwork is concerned?
That doesn't happen here.
Cool personal opinion, I guess.
Too bad it doesn't change the fact that his content is, whether you like it or not personally, videos analyzing and discussing movies and TV shows, i.e. exactly what is being described in the post you are replying to.
>threads about jlaw being nude, putin, submarine, snood
yeah, great analytic discussions
Oh, you mean on Cinemaphile? I see plenty of it happening here, all the time, regardless of the fact that shitposting also inevitably happens alongside it on the same board.
So yes, that DOES happen here.
All Cinemaphile cares about it b***hing about how everything is terrible and calling anyone who disagrees with the hive mind as a shill and trans
Nice summary. That's exactly what it's like nowadays
I want to be vore'd by a giant baby.
Drinker is insightful and constructive, if biased, on livestreams but his videos are utter swill that do little but describe the plot - but I can hardly blame him since the audience comes for that
if anything he is not biased enough like all cuckservatives out there
watch rk outpost if you want someone more biased
I wish I was that bottle of Jack Daniels, if you know what I mean. 😉
you want to be empty and filled with fake liquid whilst being tongued by a homosexual youtube grifter who's only previous job was with the clergy?
There is nothing you have said that didn't make my dick diamonds.
I like how if he really hates a movie he’ll angrily say go away now
Critical Drinker is based, have a nice day trannie. lol
jack daniels and aviator shades, I'm a classic all american badass
that's how I see me and that's how other people see me, I imagine
he's scottish
Yeah I don't get how he, or other homosexualass youtubers parroting the same obvious surface level shit managed to get so big. It's like plinkett videos except with less effort.
same reason people talk about movies/tv/games/music/anime on Cinemaphile and most threads are negative
>WAAAAAAH STOP SAYING NEGATIVE THINGS ABOUT [Corporate Wokeslop Product #1595-37B], WAAAAAAH
Why are modern leftists so hyper defensive about soulles corporate products, to the point where they literally can't even handle a guy with a beard making cheap YouTube videos talking about them if he didn't love them and think they were the best thing since sliced bread?
...he says while defending soulless e-celeb leeches
I've literally never watched a video created by this guy, and at least currently don't care to, regardless of whether or not he already agrees, or disagrees, with my personal opinions on movies.
I literally only know this guy because he keeps being brought up on Cinemaphile by trannies that are in another utter seething shoot over him saying something bad about the latest Disney wokeslop movie or TV show.
Even if you're not argument where an ACTUAL argument, you're trying to compare a corporate collective to an individual expressing their opinions. Regardless of your personal opinion, there's no way to defend the former as being not solace in comparison to the latter, simply by virtue of definition.
Please stop fuming that some guy with a beard doesn't like your agitiprop.
>Please stop critizing shitty youtube reviewers I know nothing about because corporations are le bad
lmao kys
We get it; you are legitimately mad that this guy is allowed to express opinions on a platform despite the fact that YOU don't like them.
Here's the problem though: Nobody else cares. Normal people either think that normal individuals having the ability to express their opinions on wether a movie is good or not, without being censored, is genuinely a GOOD thing that shouldn't be forcibly stopped; and the few that don't genuinely just don't care enough to have an opinion.
You gotta step up your shilling game Critical Drinker, haven't watched a single video and never will
the person replying to you is an butthole
>>This movie is great because it is not woke and does not have THE MESSAGE
>>This movie is shit because it is woke and has THE MESSAGE
But he'S fricking right, what's the matter not enough onions in your movies, op?
>Does 20 minute videos explaining to Hollywood how they can do the bare minimum to avoid criticism
>Hollywood does bare minimum to avoid controversy but still put woke shit
When did you realize the right wing grift is what is stopping us from progressing? All they are are free marketing research and free op-Ed research. These guys do it for free too. This guy is not Joker. Joker would never do it for free
>Hollywood does bare minimum to avoid controversy
The FRICK does this even mean, schizo?
From what little I can parse from your garbled attempt at making a point, you seem to just be re-heating and re-shuffling the old bullshit argument of "Bad PR/Word of Mouth is ACTUALLY le good!!!". This has never been true and it never will be, and it's a very easy way to spot wokeoid idiots then either understand what they're talking about, nor do they want to actually be genuine and admit that they are just angry that a member of the "Lower Class" is questioning the Priestly Class and the message they are trying to preach.
If all PR was ACTUALLY a "good PR", corporations wouldn't dump money into censoring and erasing bad reviews, or trying to buy good reviews. They wouldn't fire profitable stars for doing something they claim was "controversial"; hell, they wouldn't even coach the celebrities on what to do and what not to do. In fact they do the opposite: the coach them to be as """controversial""" as possible in order to generate more attention.
>LE GRIFTERINO!!! LE GRIFTEROONY!!!
Why is this always the go-to insult/accusation the second ANYBODY doesn't like a movie? Or at least doesn't like some modern corporate wokeslop movie?
How is he "grifting"? Using WHAT? What is his formula/process, and why do you think that's what he's doing? Do you have any evidence to back that up? Have you considered the possibility that there is, in fact, just a guy on the internet with a YouTube channel, and he just DOESN'T like the latest Marvel movie in his own personal genuine opinion? Do you want ironically believe that, in reality, he secretly loves that movie, but he's saying otherwise because apparently that somehow translates into profit?
homie you fry mars bars and drink gum flavored soda instead of water
Is this a "meme" or something that I'm just unfamiliar with? Or legitimate schizo drivel?
people who do nothing but go "you're moronic" without arguments are not real users, they are only here to make people here feel bad
you're moronic
I'd argue that Drinker is one of the few non-grifters amongst the other "anti-woke" YouTube channels.
However you feel about his style of videos, there is some nuance to his reviews which you won't find with the others. There's still people seething that he gave the gay episode in The Last of Us a positive review.
He's a published author too, so I feel his criticism is earned, unlike the plethora of talentless shit-talkers whose only contributions are negative criticisms of others' work.
being a published author doesnt mean anything.
just because something is printed/published doesnt automatically give it weight or substance.
Grifter is the go to because these people feel like they are being cheated because they wage while DrinkerBVLLs laze around watching films and take in the money by giving lowest common denominator takes and saying what everyone is thinking in a funnier way than anyone who watches could articulate.
>These guys do it for free too
drinker just has to put together a 9 minute video and he'll get 1-2M views. other dudes in his circle are jelly he gets so much for so little work. he makes mid 6 figures off it and is bankrolling a tv adaptation of his book series
Young Rippa aka Eric July is doing pretty good himself so I doubt he's jelly. ANd Nerdrotic aka Gary is also eating pretty good. Matter of fact, who in the geek & gamer crowd isn't making easy money right now?
they're all doing well. jay started his own channel too. his kickstarter sold out too so he's working on a new comic. as long as disney keeps cranking out this bullshit it will print money for them. the only issue is if youtube decides to crack down on them. people constantly try to label them as transphobic and sexist and racist but they don't get cancelled. they seem to have learned the ins and outs of it pretty well.
The loud black guy and C3PO
if you wanna see one new dude, bagface is cool https://www.youtube.com/@Iambagface he is just starting out. he used to be a musician and got cancelled and he's trying to start over again on youtube. he sometimes hangs out with little platoon and them on lostchord and other channels
>critical grifter
>Despite already basically owning the near entirety of the professional "film criticism" circuit to the point of being able to ensure that few to know voices of dissent or negativity against their corporate products or political messaging are ever allowed to pop up and be listened to there, Hollywood is now setting it sights on the NEXT single biggest social and ideological threat to its profits and its social-engineering agenda that remains: Independently owned YouTube Channels where some guy with a beard says there latest movie wasn't particularly good.
Kek. Absolutely amazing.
Pointing out woke shit in modern movies is like pointing out that the sky is blue. It is what is, obviously it's something that can negatively affect the movie but if you can't filter that out and judge it from a filmmaking standpoint you have no business being a film critic. The average fa/tv/irgin provide deeper analysis and better takes than the annoying midwit drinker.
>Pointing out woke shit in modern movies is like pointing out that the sky is blue. It is what is
Obviously not, because the majority of people, despite it being fewer than ever before, are still laboring under the delusion that the vast majority of media is made by at least somewhat politically neutral people who AREN'T using it as a propaganda platform to promote far-left values and ideals that for the most part would have been completely unacceptable 30 or even just 10 years ago.
>obviously it's something that can negatively affect the movie
It inherently does. Insipid, delusional beliefs and motivations shoehorned into media that is supposed to be about entertaining people rather than indoctrinating them is a quality that inherently makes any media worse. It is not something that even CAN be "neutral" as far as the movies overall quality, let alone something that is INHERENTLY "neutral".
>but if you can't filter that out and judge it from a filmmaking standpoint you have no business being a film critic
Why should an integral component of the movie that negatively affects its overall quality and the creators of the media were simultaneously so confident in that they chose to include them, ever be "filtered out"?
It's sounding more and more to me like what you really have a problem with is people acknowledging, let alone criticizing, this bent of political-messaging and agitiprop. Why should just be "accepted", let alone outright ignored, as your shilling for? Because people acknowledging it and criticizing it makes you nervous?
>It's sounding more and more to me like what you really have a problem with is people acknowledging, let alone criticizing, this bent of political-messaging and agitiprop. Why should just be "accepted", let alone outright ignored, as your shilling for? Because people acknowledging it and criticizing it makes you nervous?
I don't care much for politics but I mostly agree with his opinions. I just think at this point you can't escape woke shit in Hollywood productions, spending 20 minutes complaining about it instead of just mentioning it and then analyzing other aspects of the film seems pointless and only done to pull in anti woke viewers.
Midwit: The Post
Acknowledging a problem and people actually understanding that it's a problem in the first place is ALWAYS the first step towards solving that problem.
That's EXACTLY why I leftists don't ever want this sort of thing discussed or even acknowledged: they just wanted it accepted by the entire general populace while that same populace ALSO agrees to lie and say that "No, the Emperor IS in fact wearing clothes, and the clothes ARE in fact very pretty. Only a fool or a crazy person would ever suggest that the emperor is ACTUALLY naked...".
Propaganda is a hell of a lot less effective when the target audience is aware that it is propaganda; i.e. something created for a specific purpose and goal by people with specific motivations and ideologies.
You know what I think I greatly underestimated the amount of people who will blindly swallow wokeslop. Disregard my posts, I suck wieners.
You will never ever convince a normie to stop watching zogfilm, short of taking political power and rewriting their programming. Not a single person who likes these films has ever been convinced by a fricking YOUTUBE VIDEO that their taste is wrong. Ever. The point of LE EBIN FAKEDRUK REVIEWER is to give normiecons and enlightened centrists who think the revolution has gone just a little too far something to clap and throw money at. By all metrics, it is a grift, and just because he sincerely believes what he says doesn't transform it into a non-grift.
M O D E R N A U D I E N C E S
Jack Daniels is garbage
>Just state the obvious about shitty movies
>Get millions of subscribers
Is it really that easy?
Apparently not. Otherwise why wouldn't more people do it?
you could try but you need basic charisma and not have the voice and personality of a sperg.
also you need the self control not to go on a tirade about Black folk and israelites and get your channel permanently blacklisted by the algorithm.
It requires a shtick. Drinker is the lost member of Channel Awesome.
chuds like being told they are right
They're hardly ever right, though.
>disliked Midsommar
>liked The Menu
What a moron lol
He's like normie firendly E;R
I can't get over how fricking gay it is to wear aviators indoors and pose with a bottle of jack to take a selfie for your reviewsona
My biggest issue with him is that he's clearly a moron that can barely read at a 4th grade level, it shows in his analysis as soon as he's pressed on more than surface level anti-woke talking points. Do whatever you want with the analysis but put some effort into it for frick's sake, have some pride in your work.
I was glad he got russel crowe on but as soon as I watched the interview I was pretty angry drinker was the one interviewing him. he has no fricking clue about movies and only gives the most surface level critiques of stuff but people love it
I enjoyed him at first but every video is identical. You already know the moment you see the screenshot how his roughly 10 minute review will go. Couldnt be more of an assembly line. Cookie cutter boring ass vids of a grown man whining about movies and shows. Retelling the exact same jokes and inserting the same poopoo peepee fart stock footage of some scottish comedy is peak midwit tier.
Read fricking books. Go read Adorno's The Culture Industry. Read some fricking Neil Postman or James Garvey or some shit. Frick youtube.
He acts so Chad wearing sunglasses and drink weakshit alcohol to make him look masculine but when the camera turns off he kneels for black wieners
Is the reason he keeps using this same picture in his videos because he has extreme homolust for the guy in it?
He likes Dunc, so his opinions are invalid.
dunc was kino
Still not watching the Critical Drinker, shills
he's right you know
People that use drinking as their personality or think it’s cool and manly are super lame.
So are people who pick bad movies apart while trying super hard to be funny. And people who hate popular things just to be contrarian. He's really nailing a trifecta of unlikable personality trait substitutes.
>yes
whats the message he keeps waffling about?
Judaism
Trannie thread
Yeah, he's not particularly interesting. He has no deeper thoughts, no insights into film-making, no interesting perspective, it's just constant criticism of things we all know are shit.
He's not a smart man and he doesn't watch good films. All he talks about is low hanging capeshit and Disney garbage and then pretends to be pretentious about them.
he gets big because marvel tards seem to like listening to things they already agree with over and over and over
He’s pretty centrist at the end of the day, but he still knows his audience too.
Diversity and inclusion is a good thing (despite the crying my saying so will undoubtedly generate), it’s in HOW and it’s presented.
I used to not like CDrinker b/c of his not-so-careful takes that veered into misogyny (what I now formulate as a ploy to gain views), but now I really like him more than many others. I believe that at the background of his caricature of a public personality is a dude who really sees the battlefield and wants it to find a positive resolution.
>Diversity and inclusion is a good thing
Diversity and inclusion isnt a bad thing
fixed that for you
>No I will not review anything that isn't a franchise or war movie
He's a lazier frick than Mike Stoklasa and the Pitch Meeting dude is more succinct about this slop
his videos are pretty shit. he puts very little effort into them now. barely talks about the script too. whines about identity politics, then just gives a quick play by play followed by his thoughts at the end, and then that's it. I prefer mauler.
I watched his most recent video and he whined that avatar 2 has no memes therefore it's a bad movie
ignore youtube grifters
made a career out of attacking woke movies no actual film analysis or critique. Just spits out what he thinks his audience wants to hear. Accent got real annoying and tiresome real quick.
I just love that Rian Johnson started this million dollar subculture on YouTube by making a trash movie
So you like all the homosexualry in movies and the political messages? Ok, I guess he's not for you.
Go away now.
>Doesn't get political and just tells you if the movie sucks or not in quickest way no bullshit ramble that goes on, videos rarely 10 mins.
>Been doing it for over ten years.
>>This movie is great because it is not woke and does not have THE MESSAGE
>>This movie is shit because it is woke and has THE MESSAGE
long enough for the video to be profitable
>>GO AWAY NOW
>this movie is bad because the lead actor is a woman and/or a person of color
>this movie is good because the lead actor is a cis white man
yes
He praised Everything Everywhere All at Once.
He's actually pretty easy to please. He just doesn't like it when a male character has to get shat on for the female character to shine.
Yeah he seems too easy to please. After he liked Free Guy I refuse to trust his recommendations
>Mads Mikkelsen has to be one of my favorite actors
>Druk? What? Another Round? Never heard of it
He will never come back from this
This guy looks cringe as frick. I wouldn't watch his videos on the fact he looks like a try-hard little homosexual. Codes he even drink the Jack Daniels or just pretend to?
Also, wearing sunglasses indoors. Ishygddt
Dude always flip flops if something is woke or not if the movie is a success. He's a professional grifter.