he was the incel villain >we were suppose to get married I was finally going to be happy...
kek sounded exactly like those incels online when I heard it
My issue wasn't him simping for her, but that she rejects him with just an "ew gross" instead of giving a reason, such as she could never marry a villain who attacks innocent people.
It would've worked if they'd gotten someone like Mel Brooks to voice him. But the blatant (and badly done) "Hey, I'm doing an old israelite voice!" voice that Fred Armisen used did not work at all.
He wasn’t even a loser. He had a family who loved him (if a little judgmental), a brother who admired him, a fledgling small business, and by the end, two kingdoms who had his back, and a cute princess who was DTF (the “pet turtle” thing was code, and she was going for it)
He started off in a loser-esque position, because that allows for growth and development. That’s basic b***h storytelling.
From what I've heard, the original angle for the movie was "lol Mario's a loser, Princess Peach does all the work but Mario gets all the credit," but Nintendo went "NO" and they had to rework the plot accordingly. Admittedly, I'm not 100% sure if this is official or just people making shit up.
that is 100% people making shit up, Illumination and Nintendo were working together since day 1, and the movie's story was surely long finished when the trailer was made.
>>Who is he? >HES NOT IMPORTANT!!!
I remember seeing someone online (Maybe it was in Cinemaphile? Might've been Cinemaphile) saying they could've still had basically that same joke while also not diminishing Mario by simply: >Random Toad: "Who's that guy?" >Peach: "He... is Mario!" >Peach and Mario warp away, leaving the Toads still confused
And not only does that not diminish Mario, it's actually funnier.
>Why is Mario the one doing everything when Peach is so much better than him at everything in the movie
She's a chief. So naturally sees it as her job to train, nurture, and direct people rather than do everything herself, even when she could have.
>Peach: This guy's a lunatic. A psycho. He will eat you for breakfast. He won't even notice it probably because you're very, very small.
You'd think "He's an invulnerable fire-breathing dragon" would be more relevant information than "He's a psycho," but whatever.
I wasn't part of the seethe campaign about Peach when the movie came out, but I've rewatched it a couple times, and each time I get more and more annoyed with the direction they took her in. Anya's voice is also annoying.
Its ok but Peach is great
Gloves
I want to help her put them on.
she should’ve been turtle’d
Heh, Princess Daisy any day, Peach is a feminist c**t
I’d frick movie Peach, but I’d make love to game airhead Peach.
>game airhead Peach.
No games.
PEACHAAAAZ
The girl boss thing is annoying but for the animation she looks alright
that's my point, at least they had the decency to make her attractive.
Mediocre but enjoyable movie. Licensing Take on Me was fricking moron mode though.
Way too fast pased. Without intro / credits the movie is 73 minutes long.
> hey look it's Super Mario Bros.
> hey look it Super Smash Brothers
> hey look it's Mario Kart
> ok movie's over
it kinda sucked, ngl
I can see how children would enjoy it, but there's really nothing to it
whats the appeal of disney/pixar slop when you're a grown adult?
It's great stuff when you're high or drunk because of the colors.
I just watched it for the first time yesterday. It was fine
she cute
>Let's give Mario & DK daddy issues.
>Let's make Peach a basic b***h.
It just made me want to rewatch the first Mario Bros movie. I love that flick. Dripping with sovl
It is kino but they need to make Bowser a better villain next time. His simping for Peach is cringeworthy
he was the incel villain
>we were suppose to get married I was finally going to be happy...
kek sounded exactly like those incels online when I heard it
My issue wasn't him simping for her, but that she rejects him with just an "ew gross" instead of giving a reason, such as she could never marry a villain who attacks innocent people.
Why in the ever loving frick was Donkey Kong's father an old israelite, that's what I wanna know.
It would've worked if they'd gotten someone like Mel Brooks to voice him. But the blatant (and badly done) "Hey, I'm doing an old israelite voice!" voice that Fred Armisen used did not work at all.
He wasn’t cranky enough either. He wasn’t even all that annoyed. He should have been like Walter Matthau in Grumpy Old Men.
Seth Rogen probably insisted
All the fight scenes sucked.
I almost walked out twice.
>This grown man went to theatre to watch the mario movie by himself
I got dragged in by sister & nephews.
>We had to make a Mario a loser so boys don't have any sense of selfworth.
He wasn’t even a loser. He had a family who loved him (if a little judgmental), a brother who admired him, a fledgling small business, and by the end, two kingdoms who had his back, and a cute princess who was DTF (the “pet turtle” thing was code, and she was going for it)
He started off in a loser-esque position, because that allows for growth and development. That’s basic b***h storytelling.
He doesn't need an arc.
Mario is already a fully formed character like Conan or Superman.
They made it look like Mario was going to be a loser from the trailer, but he actually wasn't in the movie. I don't know why they did that.
From what I've heard, the original angle for the movie was "lol Mario's a loser, Princess Peach does all the work but Mario gets all the credit," but Nintendo went "NO" and they had to rework the plot accordingly. Admittedly, I'm not 100% sure if this is official or just people making shit up.
that is 100% people making shit up, Illumination and Nintendo were working together since day 1, and the movie's story was surely long finished when the trailer was made.
it had no race swapping or gender swapping israelite psyop shit, so that alone made it enjoyable.
Why is her head so big?
>Who is he?
HES NOT IMPORTANT!!!
Oh no guys, Mario is missing!
>Who's that?
>>Who is he?
>HES NOT IMPORTANT!!!
I remember seeing someone online (Maybe it was in Cinemaphile? Might've been Cinemaphile) saying they could've still had basically that same joke while also not diminishing Mario by simply:
>Random Toad: "Who's that guy?"
>Peach: "He... is Mario!"
>Peach and Mario warp away, leaving the Toads still confused
And not only does that not diminish Mario, it's actually funnier.
The whole movie was weird about that. Why is Mario the one doing everything when Peach is so much better than him at everything in the movie?
>Why is Mario the one doing everything when Peach is so much better than him at everything in the movie
She's a chief. So naturally sees it as her job to train, nurture, and direct people rather than do everything herself, even when she could have.
In the bonus feature for the movie, anya said that was her character flaw
>this made incels piss their pants in fear in 2023
>Peach: This guy's a lunatic. A psycho. He will eat you for breakfast. He won't even notice it probably because you're very, very small.
You'd think "He's an invulnerable fire-breathing dragon" would be more relevant information than "He's a psycho," but whatever.
Yeah
Shittiest Peach
made for BIG BOWSER wiener
B I G K O O P A KOCK
It was fine
I wasn't part of the seethe campaign about Peach when the movie came out, but I've rewatched it a couple times, and each time I get more and more annoyed with the direction they took her in. Anya's voice is also annoying.
PEACH IS A GIRLBOSS
Saw it, it was extremely basic.
It's the perfect modern movie to represent modern Nintendo. Bland, sanitized, safe. The absolute definition of "mid".