>Reboot and sequel mean the same thing.
No, they don't, moron.
A reboot is a do-over you restart everything with none of the event that had happened in the previous show mattering or being part of he new continuity.
A sequel means a continuation of the stories previously told, still set in the same continuity.
>She-Ra >Rise of the TMNT >Animaniacs >Looniversity >Beavis and Butthead >Ben 10 2016 >DuckTales 2017 >King of the Hill is looking tight
Yeah, reboot chads won.
Beavis and Buthead is a sequel/continuation, not a reboot.
Also, the case for Animaniac (arguably) and King of the Hill would be a sequel, not a reboot.
>Samurai Jack reboot when?
We already got one. It's called season 5. It even did the same shit as X-Men '97 where they make it a mature show for people who grew up on the original seasons as kids
Paid posting is a valuable service that helps facilitate discussion. I don't see any of you neckbeards making any worthwhile topics. "Here's a girl character I like to jerk off to". Grow up.
Because I did not want to see thousands of threads reeing about woke stuff. So I was pleasently surprised that there were none of it, and that people actually dig the new show. I love the X-Men, so the last thing I wanted to see is people bashing it brutally, especially if deserved
The fanbase for 97 are zoomers who weren't even born when the show was airing new episodes. Are you really that surprised?
The funny thing is they're happy to call woke shit on anything else.
Instead of rebooting anything. Why not remaster the original and just upscale it for modern nerds? Why pretend new writers even give any fricks about writing, same with animators of today Why pretend they do shit at all?
So why remake anything? Nostalgia homosexualry aside, it had a good premise and it had a good message and it has superior animation and a better voice cast.
I'd much prefer new stories with new settings but the creative nerds all have nothing interesting to say today.
because general audiences love nostalgia and new IPs usually flop. So you take that old premise and repackage it for "modern" times. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't
because general audiences love nostalgia and new IPs usually flop. So you take that old premise and repackage it for "modern" times. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't
It still had more stories after being cancelled once; the show got one more season than intended.
X-Men mostly faithfully adapts the story arcs from the comics. Unless all X-Men comics are wiped from earth, the cartoon will always have stories to tell because the source material is so vast.
>For example, the old TAS Spider-Man never got a proper sendoff to find Mary-Jane who was lost since the end of season 3. >And the 90s X-Men series still had more stories to tell post-Xavier as '97 demonstrates.
Fricking this! 97 and the new King of the Hill show that there's still story potential and it needs to be shown.
You Black folk can tell me how great this show is until the heat death of the universe and I still won't watch it. Shit looks like a PS2 licensed game's cutscenes.
Cartoons are a visual medium.
Nah, each can save the other when exceptionally good. Alien Ressurection is a poorly written movie, but I’ll watch it because the whole thing looks weird.
Right? Why can't Cinemaphile understand this? Why are they so obsessed with "muh visual medium"?
I could just go watch some actual real movies that tell a good story with visuals that aren't repulsive. Hell, if I have to watch a cartoon I am sure there is a good anime I missed over the last couple of years. >Writing can save art, art can't save writing.
Some of the most well regarded animated films of all time have a heavy bias towards style over substance. You morons are beyond saving if you think this ugly bullshit is better than Fantastic Planet.
>A good sequel means we should do reboot instead
nani?
Reboot and sequel mean the same thing.
X-Men is a better sequel than what Genndy came up with.
>Reboot and sequel mean the same thing.
No, they don't, moron.
A reboot is a do-over you restart everything with none of the event that had happened in the previous show mattering or being part of he new continuity.
A sequel means a continuation of the stories previously told, still set in the same continuity.
People use them interchangeably now. Get used to it.
They are wrong and should be corrected at any occasion possible.
Words evolve boomer
Not those ones.
Nah all words change
But here, they are just using the words wrong. It's not a case of the meaning changing.
Found the zoomer. Bet you expect everything to be trilogies too
Yes and yes.
Sorry you're such a boomer.
>She-Ra
>Rise of the TMNT
>Animaniacs
>Looniversity
>Beavis and Butthead
>Ben 10 2016
>DuckTales 2017
>King of the Hill is looking tight
Yeah, reboot chads won.
Beavis and Butthead is the only good one
Rise of TMNT was omega based and Ducktales was just alright.
The rest I agree
It's all based anon. There has never been a bad revival in the last ten years.
Beavis and Buthead is a sequel/continuation, not a reboot.
Also, the case for Animaniac (arguably) and King of the Hill would be a sequel, not a reboot.
This. Literally non-sequitur not posting.
I think OP meant revival
This is the best cartoon I have ever seen!!
Disney rules.
This but unironically.
Cinemaphile needs to recognize a good sequel.
Praise Disney
Praise Marvel
Praise Star Wars
I am so receptive to the hype!
This but unironically. It feels good to enjoy things again.
More blatant shilling than the fallout show. Not watching it.
Your loss. We eating good.
>Samurai Jack reboot when?
We already got one. It's called season 5. It even did the same shit as X-Men '97 where they make it a mature show for people who grew up on the original seasons as kids
>It's called season 5.
but that shit was only good for like 5 episodes
Which is why it needs a revival of some kind, either as a sequel or reboot.
The original X-Men was already mature while Samurai Jack was just a kid's show.
Paid posting is a valuable service that helps facilitate discussion. I don't see any of you neckbeards making any worthwhile topics. "Here's a girl character I like to jerk off to". Grow up.
Get scared
I feel relieved that x-men 97 is succesfull I was afraid to visit co for few weeks after it premiered
Why?
Because I did not want to see thousands of threads reeing about woke stuff. So I was pleasently surprised that there were none of it, and that people actually dig the new show. I love the X-Men, so the last thing I wanted to see is people bashing it brutally, especially if deserved
You sound like a fricking pussy if you want to avoid Cinemaphile cause they might bash a show you like.
It's Cinemaphile, get over yourself.
The fanbase for 97 are zoomers who weren't even born when the show was airing new episodes. Are you really that surprised?
The funny thing is they're happy to call woke shit on anything else.
All revivals are successful, Cinemaphile is just full of whiny piss babies.
Define “successful”.
Everything gets shat on here so you have to be a real pussy to fear this show getting shat on.
We are just never getting new IPs with effort put into them, are we?
nice b8 m8
>t. salty over 97 stealing the spotlight
I like 97, gay.
Get a life.
Sure you do Genndy. Sure you do.
MOTHER OF GOD, WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE
I will not elaborate though
Instead of rebooting anything. Why not remaster the original and just upscale it for modern nerds? Why pretend new writers even give any fricks about writing, same with animators of today Why pretend they do shit at all?
Huh. Good point.
the originals are often not that good and live on nostalgia. X-men is a pretty good example
Same with anything from the 2000s. Samurai Jack does not hold up at all.
So why remake anything? Nostalgia homosexualry aside, it had a good premise and it had a good message and it has superior animation and a better voice cast.
I'd much prefer new stories with new settings but the creative nerds all have nothing interesting to say today.
>I'd much prefer new stories with new settings
You want a novelty. You'd like Genndy slop.
I do like him, too bad he sucks at endings.
>sometimes
Try most times.
because general audiences love nostalgia and new IPs usually flop. So you take that old premise and repackage it for "modern" times. Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't
This is a good summation. Nothing more complicated than this.
It's still worth making new adventures for these old properties.
For example, the old TAS Spider-Man never got a proper sendoff to find Mary-Jane who was lost since the end of season 3.
And the 90s X-Men series still had more stories to tell post-Xavier as '97 demonstrates.
It still had more stories after being cancelled once; the show got one more season than intended.
X-Men mostly faithfully adapts the story arcs from the comics. Unless all X-Men comics are wiped from earth, the cartoon will always have stories to tell because the source material is so vast.
>For example, the old TAS Spider-Man never got a proper sendoff to find Mary-Jane who was lost since the end of season 3.
>And the 90s X-Men series still had more stories to tell post-Xavier as '97 demonstrates.
Fricking this! 97 and the new King of the Hill show that there's still story potential and it needs to be shown.
WHAT THE FRICK I LOVE DISNEY ALL OF THE SUDDEN?!
You Black folk can tell me how great this show is until the heat death of the universe and I still won't watch it. Shit looks like a PS2 licensed game's cutscenes.
Cartoons are a visual medium.
I'd rather have good writing and shit visuals in a cartoon than shit writing and good visuals. Writing can save art, art can't save writing.
This.
Right? Why can't Cinemaphile understand this? Why are they so obsessed with "muh visual medium"?
What a decade of adult animation and loregay shows have done to this board,
Nah, each can save the other when exceptionally good. Alien Ressurection is a poorly written movie, but I’ll watch it because the whole thing looks weird.
I could just go watch some actual real movies that tell a good story with visuals that aren't repulsive. Hell, if I have to watch a cartoon I am sure there is a good anime I missed over the last couple of years.
>Writing can save art, art can't save writing.
Some of the most well regarded animated films of all time have a heavy bias towards style over substance. You morons are beyond saving if you think this ugly bullshit is better than Fantastic Planet.
They’re just dumb and need to watch some Aeon Flux.
>reboot
Wrong.
>sequel
Correct.
I want a new season of Evolution
That was one case of a decent finale. Came a long way from the lame two first seasons.
Evolution has nothing on TAS
Three words, folks.
THUNDARR. THE. BARBARIAN.
1. This is not a reboot, but a sequel.
2. It's shit in more than one way.
Okay gambit gay