It is one of the most beautifully looking film of the past two decades. And it also looked like it was actually shot on film.
How the frick did they do it?
>It is one of the most beautifully looking film of the past two decades. >And it also looked like it was actually shot on film. >How the frick did they do it?
[citation needed]
No, honestly, citation plz, I've seen people claim this, and nobody has substantiated it with a single semblance of a proof.
It looked like shit because it was edited by some tiktok brained moron.
None of the shots last longer than half a second, you can't appreciate any of the set or production design as a result.
It's like you're watching a commercial or a music video or a trailer. Except it's fricking hours long and insanely dull.
>And it also looked like it was actually shot on film. >How the frick did they do it?
Because morons who jerk off about shit being shot on film can't actually tell what the film look is (because it actually doesn't exist). The film has a bit of noise and crushed highlights combined with harsh lighting or natural lighting. That's enough to capture the aesthetic of the films you think of when you think of films shot on film.
Blade Runner was groundbreaking from a production standpoint and was based on one of the most influential sci-fi novels ever. And it stars one of the most popular actors ever and was directed by one of the successful directors ever.
The Creator is a clipshow of sci-fi movie cliches made by a B-grade director and C-grade actors.
It's new age scifislop. All the scifisop movies are like this >West bad >Humans bad >Asians good >AI good >MC betrays the original cause because of "feelings"
It's all so tiresome and the same.
The most moronic thing I ever saw was a Robot smoking. This is beyond dumb, like I understand making the robots act more human like. But the robot doesn't even have lungs, why the frick is it smoking from a bong?
Its already forgotten
>will be
Can you read, gay?
Nobody cares
It’s a perfect blend of Blade Runner and Apocalypse Now.
It is one of the most beautifully looking film of the past two decades. And it also looked like it was actually shot on film.
How the frick did they do it?
Shot the movie with a cheap little FX3
but hOW THE FRICK. It wasn't only the vintange lenses doing the heavy lifting.
>It is one of the most beautifully looking film of the past two decades.
>And it also looked like it was actually shot on film.
>How the frick did they do it?
[citation needed]
No, honestly, citation plz, I've seen people claim this, and nobody has substantiated it with a single semblance of a proof.
homie go watch the movie
>homie go watch the movie
no
It looked like shit because it was edited by some tiktok brained moron.
None of the shots last longer than half a second, you can't appreciate any of the set or production design as a result.
It's like you're watching a commercial or a music video or a trailer. Except it's fricking hours long and insanely dull.
>And it also looked like it was actually shot on film.
>How the frick did they do it?
Because morons who jerk off about shit being shot on film can't actually tell what the film look is (because it actually doesn't exist). The film has a bit of noise and crushed highlights combined with harsh lighting or natural lighting. That's enough to capture the aesthetic of the films you think of when you think of films shot on film.
>from the director of rogue one
Maybe by redditors and american boomers who overrate shit because they don't have le french touch to know what real artistry looks like.
You’re not French nor European though, Hansdeep Nigelwong.
Im from Quebec, thats when they sent all the french Chads to boreal forests and now France sucks.
rusanglogerm halfbreed with some Métis thrown in
Blade Runner was groundbreaking from a production standpoint and was based on one of the most influential sci-fi novels ever. And it stars one of the most popular actors ever and was directed by one of the successful directors ever.
The Creator is a clipshow of sci-fi movie cliches made by a B-grade director and C-grade actors.
this is literally the first time for me ever hearing about this film
Every piece of degeneracy such as op wont be preserved.
It’s a videogame turned into a movie
>This shit will be remembered like Blade Runner does now,
considering the world's ending I think that's unlikely to say the least.
Nobody can ever answer why the station thing has to be almost directly overhead to shoot missiles at targets.
chuds mind broken by JD Washington
Pedophiles praising degeneracy as usual.
It's new age scifislop. All the scifisop movies are like this
>West bad
>Humans bad
>Asians good
>AI good
>MC betrays the original cause because of "feelings"
It's all so tiresome and the same.
>MC has to save a special child
I want this trope to fricking end
This would've been a cult classic if the ai weren't written to be such fricking morons so that the story could happen
The most moronic thing I ever saw was a Robot smoking. This is beyond dumb, like I understand making the robots act more human like. But the robot doesn't even have lungs, why the frick is it smoking from a bong?
>being a robot without bellows for smoking
no the most moronic was suicide robot bomber runners, homie just use a fricking rocket laucher
ok you've convinced me, watching it