This Voldemort design would have been way better than the one we got.

This Voldemort design would have been way better than the one we got.

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Disfigured human face looks better than generic lizard monster shit.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Looks like the power rangers dino thunder villain.

      That looks fricking stupid. The face in the movie is creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.

      >That looks fricking stupid. The face in the movie is creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.
      Nah it's not. He looks and moves like a homosexual, bald ballet dancer who lost his nose to cocaine. He reminds me of Michael Jackson more than of anything else. Not that this design would be great but it's still an improvement over the abysmall version we got.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >EHHH EH EEEEE!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          DEH!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >leftist are still butthurt about this psychotic witch not becoming president
            lol

            • 3 weeks ago
              Anonymous

              Bill’s wife is awful but he deserved to be the First Husband even if she didn’t deserve the presidency.

              • 2 weeks ago
                Anonymous

                The first husband to do what?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The cgi monster face in the first one really, really, REALLY sucked though.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No it didn’t, morono.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How does he "deh" in this design though?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >deeehssssssssssss
      >*sheds skin*

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did the books describe Voldemort after he came back? It seems kind of moronic that he would look like this after being revived just because that's how he looked when he was renting the back of some dude's head.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much exactly the same as how he appears in the movies, although I believe it's said he has red eyes with snake pupils.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He looked pretty human as well in the first movie (excluding the fact that he was a face behind some other dude's head), this isn't the design they used.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah, he's pretty much described the same way as he was when he was just a face.
      >The thin man stepped out of the cauldron, staring at Harry...and Harry stared back into the face that had haunted his nightmares for three years. Whiter than a skull, with wide, livid scarlet eyes and a nose that was flat as a snake’s but with slits for nostrils. His hands were like large, pale spiders; his long white fingers caressed his own chest, his arms, his face; the red eyes, whose pupils were slits, like a cat's, gleamed still more brightly through the darkness.

      I feel like the movie was pretty faithful to the book description aside from the eyes, which they just gave him regular blue eyes in the movie. That seems to be a consistent problem in Hollywood, they also gave Thanos normal human eyes when he has black eyes with glowing pupils in the comics.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >That seems to be a consistent problem in Hollywood, they also gave Thanos normal human eyes when he has black eyes with glowing pupils in the comics.
        I think this has to do with stupid Hollywood logic that "well if you cant see his eyes, you cant identify with the character or understand them!" Even though hes the main bad guy and is a creepy snake freak.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Same in all rhe Dune adaptions.
          Spice makes your eyes (white parts too) so dark blue they look black.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, Rowling's prose sucks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Perfectly serviceable for children's literature. Besides, people whose primary criticism centres on "le prose" are pseuds who don't have any actual insight to offer.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They also don't offer anything as an example, it's just
            >This is terrible
            "Okay what's good to you"
            >I don't need to show you

            .t never read and never wanna read harry potter

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >muh prose

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          What's wrong with that particular excerpt?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Literally nothing. Rowling's prose is sometimes dull. She'll write stuff like
            >,said Harry furiously
            >, said Ron angrily
            which is lazy and lacks imagery. But the excerpt posted is good for YA lit.

            Damn, Rowling's prose sucks

            is just parroting what he read somewhere else because he doesn't form his own opinions.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's
        >The thin man stepped out of the cauldron and stretched his legs, staring at Harry...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >...Harry stared back into the face that had haunted his nightmares for three years. Whiter than a skull, with wide, livid scarlet eyes and a nose that was as flat as a snakes with slits for nostrils... Lord Voldemort had risen again

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Somehow Voldemort returned

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Voldemort's appearance became more and more deformed as he created horcruxes. It only makes sense that his appearance would remain deformed and snake like after being revived since the horcruxes still existed and were why he was still alive.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I always assumed he modified his body on purpose because he identified as a snakedude

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He looked freaky because his body was created in that twisted ritual using snake blood and whatever shit. I think he was more or less a regular dude before he ate his own death spell

          >Harry let out a hastily stifled gasp. Voldemort had entered the room. His features were not those Harry had seen emerge from the great stone cauldron almost two years ago: They were not as snake-like, the eyes were not yet scarlet, the face not yet masklike, and yet he was no longer handsome Tom Riddle. It was as though his features had been burned and blurred; they were waxy and oddly distorted, and the whites of the eyes now had a permanently bloody look, though the pupils were not yet the slits that Harry knew they would become. He was wearing a long black cloak, and his face was as pale as the snow glistening on his shoulders.

          No, he's fricked up looking because of the horcruxes. This is from the books when Harry viewed Dumbledore's memory of Voldemort coming to apply for the DADA job at Hogwarts after he had gone into hiding creating his horcruxes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He looked freaky because his body was created in that twisted ritual using snake blood and whatever shit. I think he was more or less a regular dude before he ate his own death spell

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >im a lizard harry

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I kek'd
      harry potter threads are always comfy

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I found your reddit account pretty easily

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can you imagine if Robin Williams got cast as Hagrid? The production crew would literally have wished for death every day (unless he was footing the coke bill). How long did it take to make all those movies? Like 14 years? Imagine 14 years of robin williams reshoots and this is what will make or break your career in film.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Robin Williams is American so he'd have been rejected by Rowling straight away. She was pretty serious about the casting to be British actors.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    DEH!

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just give the one on the left a nose. They took the "snake-like" thing in the book way too literal.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah bro, this series really needed the primary antagonist mired in really shitty 2000's CGI!

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like the power rangers dino thunder villain.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i genuinely do not care about the last two movies
    and the 2009 one was already kinda out there still fine
    but first yates movie was the last actual harry potter like movie to me
    2009 it's already another period in time kinda

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    looks like a dinosaur

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That looks fricking stupid. The face in the movie is creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The face in the movie is creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.
      You can't just use "than" on its own like that when making a comparison, you need to specify "more than" or "less than."
      >The face in the movie is more creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.
      or
      >The face in the movie is less creepy and unsettling than a generic dinosaur face.
      Without adding that distinction it's not clear how you're intending to frame the comparison.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It should be obvious by quoting the OP with "that looks fricking stupid" that he meant more you autistic cretin.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's possible to discern from context, but it's still very jarring to read a sentence with half-phrases and completely missing words.

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    looks like the fricking coopa from that 90's Mario Bros movie

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah. It wouldnt match Ralph Fiennes acting, which was pretty good.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Looks like Baraka. Looks pretty cool

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No the movie version is way better.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Aww look he's smiling

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    he'd be more frickable for sure.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They took snekdude from us, I hate it.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah, at that point he would just be a spooky monster and lose any form of humanity, thats easy to kill. Movie version is a demonic human, almost monstrous, but still human.

    Though i do feel they should have dropped the ears for the movie version, or have them fused to the head.

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >possibly the only character with a decent description in the books besides Harry
    >they turn him into a toe

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, but the one from the first movie was perfect.
    Not that anything after the first three movies matter anyway.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like it!

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Here's your Voldemort, bro

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Greatness inspires envy, envy engenders spite, spite spawns lies

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *