Thought on Chip Chilla?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Thought on Chip Chilla?
Thought on Chip Chilla?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Never heard of it. But it's for 4-year olds.
>4-year olds
I'm 53 and I watch it. I can only watch cute cartoons like this in order to cope with my addictions after I spent 17 years in prison.
Why do you feel the need to lie. Just admit you're an autistic 30 year old like the rest of this place.
so this is going to be the Cinemaphile equivalent of what is a woman? spam right
It's more funny than that because this show is entirely non-controversial but it will still get 500 replies of seething every time just based on association.
>Harmless kids show with no political messages trying to be cute
>At worse Bluey rippoff
>Cinemaphileumblr crying muh conservatives and muh /misc/
RENT FREE
Looks like a generic cutesy cartoon for toddlers. Is it the new Bluey or something?
>Love-crafted family oriented dog show
vs
>Poo in the loo animated, tweening reddit show
How very dare you.
the original concept had better designs, now they all look the same
>Alright we have our own platform to make our own art
>produces the most generic bland shit ever
This is why people say Conservatives can't into art
Conservatives work mainly from the left side of the brain. The ability to create art comes from the right side.
Anon, that's every American platform these days.
Americans in general are very bland.
This they should make weird unprofitable stuff to launch their service with, definitely the path to a successful platform.
>Story about toys coming to life and fighting over who's the favorite
>Story about individualism through the lens of an ant
>Story about a down-on-his-luck supervillain who adopts three orphans
None of these are "weird" or "unprofitable", but at the same time they still have more to offer than
>bluey with chinchillas
>liberal biases
You're preconceiving that I'm a liberal because I have standards. Do you have to be an atheist to think Strawinsky is shit?
>It's awful
>Did you watch it?
>No
You're making a preconception based on your own liberal biases
>but it's okay when we call everything made by leftists bad even if we never seen it
>You're not allowed to criticized liberal content even if you've seen it
Typical liberal
>no you can't point out my hypocrisy
Trump lost
You admitted to your own hypocrisy as well albeit.
no i didn't
Yes you did.
>why yes I'm strawmanning how could you tell I was a disingenuous leftoid?
You voted for a pedophile that started 2 new wars
>You voted for a pedophile that started 2 new wars
Based, weak times produce weak men, Trump was creating sissies until Big Dick Biden stepped up
>pedophile that started 2 new wars
you have to narrow it down
He won't. He'll conveniently ignore that Trump's AG covered up Epstein's "suicide", and Trump didn't fire him immediately for it.
>he says while conveniently ignoring the only reason Epstien was incarcerated was because Trump had him investigated for Real Estate fraud.
Okay, and why didn't he investigate his corrupt AG covering up his murder and thus preventing other pedophiles from being incriminated? Because at that point incarcerating him means jack shit. You morons really can never honestly answer this question.
>Why didn't Trump force all corrupt agents tied to Epstien to investigate Epstien?
Might as well ask why the House still hasn't passed a bill on term limits
Bill Barr himself stated that Epstein committed suicide. Trump could have easily unilaterally fired him for this and made a statement to the contrary. He chose not to make this easy layup. There's no way to cope around this without looking like a moron.
Shut the FRICK UP and post chinchillas.
Good luck finding anyone that would investigate it without "committing suicide" themselves.
Then why vote the Black person into office at all
Because he's literally the only choice that doesn't actively help the corrupt asshats.
I don't like his stand up but love F is For Family.
That's Burr matey.
The one with alzheimer's and crack addicted son.
Not the black one, the moronic texans, the drug smuggling rapist, or the other one suffering from alzheimer's
If this was made by trannies you’d be calling it revolutionary. Which I guess it would be cause we know no trannies ever grew up in a functional two parent family
I think it's less that Right-Wingers aren't abel to make art, but rather that because the art/media industry is dogmatically left-wing it's impossible for non leftists to get access to the resources and experience/training required to make good media, really good example of this is William Dudley Pelley, he was extremely right wing but was considered a very good writer within Hollywood until his beliefs cause everyone to shun him.
"The resources and experience/training" only account for so much, though. This Kind Of Shit (bad off-brand bluey) isn't stuff artists make because they didn't go the right art schools or don't have a high enough budget. It shows a total gaping void of vision. The kind of person who makes this shit would be fricking awful at posting thoughts about cartoons on the internet, let alone making a good one. And we know that, because Ben Shapiro and friends DO post their takes on modern shows and movies and such on a regular basis, and they consistently embarrass themselves that way - yes, it's a degenerate media landscape out there, but at the Daily Wire, we're looking at people who can't even rise to that level. It's like the thing they're missing is a part of the brain, like they never developed the art center.
To be clear, I don't think right-wingers are GENERALLY unable to make art - I've always thought of myself as fairly right-wing and artistic - but the establishment ones clearly are. Soulless money-grubbing parasites grasping at straws to make things they can't understand.
So you agree with me that isn't that righters can't do art, it's just a case of the ones that can aren't able to get the resources for it.
Yeah, but I think it stands out that there are right-wingers who can get the resources to make art, and insist on using it to specifically make incredibly shitty art.
Tim Allen is openly conservative and gets a lot of work. The reason why people like Rob Schneider and Gina Corano get blacklisted is because they're openly obnoxious schizos who post conspiracy theories
Most of "conservative art" is made to be a reaction to other things. The only time conservatives made a show that actually stood on its own was Last Man Standing
It's more just western right-wingers who aren't involved in anything artistic since the west in general doesn't really care much about art or teaching art. And also, let's be honest, western creative industries are nepo-baby hotspots where people only hire their friends and people they agree with, unlike in countries like China or Korea or Japan where people in creative fields are far more likely to be hired based on actual merit.
Pic related was directed by a literal holocaust denier.
That confirms that right-wingers can't make good cartoons
Neither can left-wingers, so that's kind of a moot point.
The best media is and always has been created by centrists and apolitical people.
>60 years ago, right-wingers laughed and mocked everybody that was going into the arts and claiming that it wasn't a "real job"
>Cut to now, right-wingers are surprised when movies, art, and media in general are leftist dominated and right-winged beliefs are deprecated and/or banned.
This is like when a bratty kid refuses to play with the other kids, but once he sees how much fun everybody else is having, he comes crawling back.
Conservatives have always been the "I AM DISSAPOINT" meme
Any art that's explicitly ideological is gonna suck. Doug TenNapel and Sam Hyde make good shit because they don't preach.
Wrong because shows like The Boondocks exists. The main issue is that conservatives are just copying pre-existing properties. Call me when they produce something unique and original and not just Bluey and Sesame street knockoffs
>Any art that's explicitly ideological is gonna suck.
But if it's the "right" ideology it'll get funded regardless.
To be honest, Boondocks was only really explicitly preachy in the first season (which is imo the worst, outside of 4). Next seasons dropped the ideological stuff and just went crazy with Exorcist Parodies and Chocolate Sale Shootouts.
>doesn't involve boring lesbians, trannies, or mindless wannabe theater-kid musical numbers
>"generic"
We have reached the point where not being degenerate is the counter-culture.
>or mindless wannabe theater-kid musical numbers
Found the shit-taste slob
>actually likes wannabe theater kids
Of all the things you replied you, you replied to that. How embarrassing.
Theater classes and their consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Instead it involves boring old Christgays
>not being degenerate is the counter-culture.
I'm sure there are all sorts of places you can get your "i want to jerk off over pre-teen lesbians" itch scratched.
Why don't you give away your money to Israel instead of arguing here?
I'm sorry no one believed the hospital thing. I know you guys worked really hard on that.
Google the USS Liberty Incident
There is no daylight between the average /misc/ user and the average Palestinian supporter.
Google what Israel did to Ethiopian women.
Was this before or after Muslims raped them en masse?
Why are you okay with Israel sterilizing women without their knowledge?
Why are you ok with Arabs crying victim ever my single time they get caught committing mass murder/rape?
>Playing the false dichotomy game
That's just shows like Bluey and Peppa Pig. You described most shows Chip Chilla competes with and called them counter culture. You're saying counter culture is about promising to restrict content more than what freer networks do.
I'm jerking off to the dad right now
rob schneider is jerking off to (you)
Zionist propaganda.
Zionists want chinchillas to live together?
True we watch this before we kill muslims by bombing hospitals
I can't wait to see the mental gymnastics are muricans going to pull after all the legit war crimes israelites have been pulling these past weeks
I'm going to strap a baby to the front of my pick up truck and attempt to hit you anon. If you duck behind that brick wall and force me to crush the baby, you've just committed infanticide :^)
didn't expect anything less moronic from their most trusted golem
It's weird to make a show that's marketed as "bluey but conservative." There's not much that's anti-conservative about Bluey. They should've made "steven universe but conservative" instead.
Have they actually said "Bluey but conservative"? Bluey is one of the few shows that conservative parents like as is.
Maybe if I watch it one day, I will have thoughts.
>Conservative Bluey
Looks like shit the original designs looked better.
Frick off, cuckmmie
I hate all sides homosexual. I'm Libertarian. Frick commies and frick fascists.
>Conservative Bluey
So, Bluey?
Shut the frick up /misc/ this is why Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile laughs at you and Cinemaphile
It's literally been accused of being too conservative. Why? Because it shows nothing but cohesive family units and there are no gays.
Frick off /misc/ be a virgin chud somewhere else
>chud
Nah, I'm white.
(You)
Anon's not wrong. It has been accused of lacking queers, Black folk, and other shit. And that's okay.
How do you include Black folk in a show with no humans in it
Through the voice actors, and probably the mannerism of the dogs perhaps
it's about how they look anon, all the side characters in this show are obviously wealthy white coded folk living in a well off neighborhood
They look L.A liberals
Those are “white-coded”? They just look like animals to me.
come on dude, they obviously intentionally made the neighborhood look like one of those traditional suburban communities back when you could easily afford a house on purpose. Nowadays the only kind of people that live in places like that are people with tons of cash to spend. All the characters are wearing decent clothing and living in what essentially looks like a perfect community, do I need to spell it out to you?
Bro, they're animals, should they be living in the projects instead?
>This mf never stepped foot in the south
>Thinks all nice neighborhoods are white
You ain't never been to South East Texas then. Frick outta here with that stereotype.
Squirrel on the right is goddamn ugly. Wipe off that lipstick ffs
I like the helmet guy 😮
I need to watch this show now
he picks his nose
I mean I wouldn't turn down a mucus-covered handie, just sayin'
I appreciate they don't give the girls tights under their skirts. it sets a bad example for parents to dress their girls in a way that deprives young lads of the chance of panty shots during recess.
any toddlershit that breaks that moronic trend is OK with me.
I've seen you complain about this issue several times across Cinemaphile already. At least you admit you're just a pervert and don't genuinely care about character design. Please proceed to call me a prude liberal even though I agree skirts without tights look better.
Show should have been about her. And I'm not saying this for 'that' reason you pervs. I'm saying this because kids shows that have little boy protags are almost always, ALWAYS shit. Because when girls are annoying it tiptoes the line of still being adorable/cute. When boys are annoying you just want to punch them in the face.
That'll change once they add some monkey characters to the show 🙂
>coded
*yawn*
It's a factor. If you see no curly or puffy hair and everyone has a white accent, you can assume it's a white show for a white target audience. Which is fine.
Found the stealth /misc/gay trying to astroturf with reverse psychology.
i AGREE
The "blatant Bluey rip-off" criticism seems incredibly weak. It's a children's show about a family of animals. Is that all it takes to be a
"Bluey rip-off"? It's not exactly a revolutionary concept, Bluey just did it well.
If there's something bad about the show itself, criticize it based on that. If it teaches bad morals, point that out.
Chip is cute, btw.
It's 1000% a blatant Bluey rip-off. Same finally dynamics except that Bingo is the main character and a girl, plus there's a baby. Same bright color palette. Same focus on parents playing with their children with overly elaborate games focused on imagination and creativity.
But goddamn!
This show really made me appreciate just how well done Bluey is. The line reads in this chinchilla show are so incredibly stiff. The children's dialogue is 100% unsubtle, beating you over the head with the moral rather than worrying about making the characters fun and likeable. The dad is cringe with the "now THIS is a teachable moment". The animation is so slow and sedate and lifeless.
It's a thousand little things the show does worse than Bluey that all adds up to being a show that isn't going to grab children or adults.
>MY show for 4 year olds is the better show for 4 year olds
Y'know, I'm starting to think that the cartoon side of this board is just as dead as the comics side.
There's a reason there were so many Bluey threads on Cinemaphile when the same wasn't true for shit like Peppa Pig. The fact that you're blind to it means you should just get the frick off the board.
>There's a reason there were so many Bluey threads on Cinemaphile when the same wasn't true for shit like Peppa Pig.
Because the board wasn't a wasteland when Peppa Pig was relevant like it is nowadays?
I like Brn and Holly and Cinemaphile hated it.
None of that makes it a Bluey ripoff. Those are all common elements of children’s cartoons. The fact that you cited bright colors as proof that it’s a Bluey ripoff just shows how hard you’re reaching.
Anon just let the Bluey Autists seethe. Its funny to see.
>except that Bingo is the main character and a girl
Anon... Bingo IS a girl, Bluey and Bingo are sisters
Bluey is openly a Peppa Pig ripoff, it was specifically made as "Peppa Pig, but good," as admitted by the creator himself.
Chip Chilla was created as "uuuuuuh... something, but conservative." I'll give you that, the creator probably wouldn't get away with it if he openly admitted that he's ripping off something that is now kind-of-owned by Disney, but playing dumb won't make the obvious inspiration go away. Fact is, Chip Chilla is infinitely more similar stylistically to Bluey than Bluey is to Peppa Pig.
Nope. Peps Pig didn’t invent anything either. These are all common traits of children’s animated shows.
>Peps Pig didn’t invent anything either
they invented putting shriveled penis shaped heads in a children's cartoon
Not even that, anon
The backgrounds look ripped straight outta bluey
Colorful backgrounds?? Another creation of Bluey!!
Honestly I can't tell if op didn't watch the show, or he merely hopes that no one watched it. Sure it was supposed to be "Bluey but conservative" and you'd have great bait it that was true, but it's so inoffensively bland that when you start praising it to own the libs it just comes out as a desperate attempt at getting a reaction rather than anything remotely honest. No wonder why the totally legit conversation about the show switched to general politics after a couple posts.
>this show for 4-year-olds doesn't meet my standards for deep and thought-provoking storytelling
I'm sure you'd judge it just as harshly if it didn't have the association with conservativism, surely.
Adventures in Odyssey is ten times more entertaining than this sludge, moron.
Ok?
That's "conservative media" that gets a pass because the people making it actually give a shit. moron.
Ok?
>Make claim
>Claim is disproven
>umm ok?
>give opinion
>claim this is "proof"
Hoo boy.
>I'm sure you'd judge it just as harshly if it didn't have the association with conservativism, surely.
I'm judging Adventures in Odyssey, a show associated with devout Christian Conservatism very charitably, because it's well written unlike Video Brinquedo Bluey. My opinion is the proof moron.
>my opinion
>proof
I wonder if you'll embarass yourself a third time?
Your claim was what my judgement is. My judgement is that it's well written. Sorry that's not what you were hoping.
Care to go for a fourth?
Guess not. Another one ran away.
Anon, you've completely lost the plot. I actually wholly agree with you on AIO yet I have no idea what the frick point you're trying to make right now
Pic related
Anon claims the only reason people are shitting on this is because it's made by conservatives. I brought up an example of media made by conservatives people don't shit on. Anon spergs out. Unless you have a learning disability, this isn't hard to parse.
not him, but i need a link to AIO as I am intrigued. Googled it but found all sorts of other things, it's a generic title. Who wrote it?
AIO is Adventures in Odyssey, a Christian Radio Kids program produced by Focus On the Family that's been running since the late 80s and also had a short series of animated adaptations released throughout the 90s.
What terrible reaction images. Get a new folder.
>YOUR SIDE LOVED EPSTEIN MORE
>NO, YOUR SIDE LOVED EPSTEIN MORE!!
This is a thread about a cartoon chinchilla, btw.
Why don't we talk about the dad's ass instead?
post it homosexual
Nah, Biden's a senile pedo and I didn't vote for him. Doesn't make trumpBlack folk any better for pretending their orange homosexual isn't a pedo enabler as well.
chinchillas?
>Politically obsessed morons.
Yeah who gives a shit. I know some homosexuals like LSmark and Jake Neutron are gonna do homosexual essay videos talking about how its propaganda.
It’s pretty cute. I don’t why it makes Cinemaphile mad.
It’s going to be really funny if the show is just like every preschool show ever made
Is a children's show all it takes to make people mad now? Apparently yes
>Compilation from one literal who twitter account
Oh geez, remember when folks were seething because She-ra's boobs were too small or some shit.
This can't be real, this must be satire. If it's genuine, he's either calling a 4-year-old character a dumbass for painting the flag wrong or he erally thinks that the makers of the show don't know that there's more than one flag on the American flag.
one star*
>look up Liberian Flag
Well I'll be damned
LIBERIA LAND OF LIBERTY WHAT A PLACE TO BE PRESIDENT.
>he erally thinks that the makers of the show don't know that there's more than one flag on the American flag.
it's this one, the makers really saw a Liberia flag art asset and thought it meant American
>Benkey has gotta be a nickname for "Ben Shapiro's horny bent penis"
this can't be real
>searching for some literal who's opinion on twitter
>caring about some literal who's opinion on twitter
>making a whole ass compilation of some literal who's opinion on twitter
How can someone fall so low, I dont understand
>Getting this assmad over a cartoon because its made by gays who don't align with your viewpoints
This has to be bullshit. I refuse to believe somebody can be this terminally online.
Either way I hope he continues, these are hilarious.
>Call me "Massa", honey.
>autistic sperg
>likes badgerclops from mao mao
Yikes, but checks out
>Liberals are unhinged
Tell us something we don't know
Sure this person is a no life manchild for sperging so hard over a harmless show, but that doesn't mean the show is good.
Like every cartoon post-2010 the discussion is 90% how can we insert this into our endless political war. And yes this was made from conservative funding but it's just a boring baby show.
I have an idea for a cartoon that would be wild and interesting that would fit right in but it demands a lot of cash so I guess they'll just have Adobe Flash knock-off cartoons instead.
AND EVEN THEN...
FreedomToons on Youtube is funny and conservative, why didn't that guy get a deal?
you aren't supposed to use metal spatulas with a non-stick pan. what are they teaching these kids
Not sending their best.
Next?
There's something about a conservative website using chinchillas, an animal almost driven extinct in the wild because of unfettered capitalism, for a show about conservative values that seems a bit too on the nose.
Not really.
Maybe at one point in the past conservative meant conservation but since every party and movement sold out to capitalism that all gets pushed by the wayside. No party or religion is going to tell its adherents to have less kids.
haven't watched it. don't care.
conservatives will pour money into it for at least half a year to ensure it's a success for now
Do better, anon. I'm both disgusted and turned on.
>the face that Twitter will have nightmares of
I thought they were Wombats or something. This the same show?
Does it have witches?
I just wanna see Bluey and Chip Chilla fans whine about each others shows.
>Left vs Right
Just make a cartoon that isn't dogshit.
three words: DEATH TO ISRAEL
Death to israeli media
Long live European Animation
Australia is not European, moron
the dad is canonically a criminal
>mom eats everything in the house
>Chum Chum is an architect and is purposefully fattening his wife, Chilli, up until she's a massive chinchilla ball
>There are architects working at The Daily Wire
Honestly, their best bet is to just have a normal family adventure show.
If they don't do anything momumentally moronic like the PragerU cartoons they might just pull it off.
The only reason to watch is political. You can't even jack off to the characters
Yeah, I was gonna draw the soon banging their mom but they look so generic I cant muster the will to bother
>bright colors? talking animals? ummm can you say “Bluey rip-off”? these things were invented by Bluey, after all
Not the first time a show is baselessly accused of copying
Its either this or they're attacking it because of the creators politics. I'm not gonna watch either because i have better tastes, but its funny to see autists start turf wars over pre school shows.
>because i have better tastes
>says the name with overtly shitty reaction images
>
Have the (You)
he makes a good point anon. Its stupid that these aubreaststic morons are fighting over whose shitty pre-school show is better.
Anime site.
>le anime website scapegoat
>Many working almost everyone working for the Daily Wire are failed entertainment industry people, from writers to actors. Many had family connections in entertainment and media. Steven Crowder voiced Brain in Arthur when he was a kid.
>It's funny that during the culture war surrounding games like Gone Home and the niche indie scene, there was an opinion about how the game journalists that praised the game didn't like games at all and didn't like that they HAD to be games journalists. The narrative was the journalism market filters people who dream of being war journalists and political entertainers and filtered a bunch of young gay neon haired Californians who somehow hate video games into the field of gaming. The process was never explained or proven.
>Where it did happen, or something like it, we got Hideo Kojima and everyone loves him and his work
Also it's really funny Steven Crowder was almost a Daily Wire guy. It would have been so much better if he played the dad so we can get fan art of him smoking a cigar while berating his wife for not using their one car to go grocery shopping before he needed it for the gym.
>the process was never explained or proven
Non-wokeoids will hire anyone. Wokeoids only hire other wokeoids. By definition this means that the number of wokeoids will only increase. Is that a simple enough explanation?
It doesn't explain how the only wokeoids are journalists who wanted more prestigious jobs than being a video game journalist. Like video games are something Californian libs don't play. It's like the same thing that happened when comics went mainstream; all the sexy edge was mostly smoothed over to make a product with more mass appeal. Rather than accepting that comics have always been marketed products, there are stories of infiltration and subversion. Its just weirder for video games because almost all young Californians play them. To see a neon haired homosexual games journalists and think "this is someone who couldn't cut it as a serious journalist" is fricking moronic.
Games became increasingly popular and there was no need to be talented to write about them.
It's more like being a video game journalist is a dream job and playing an hour of the latest AAA studio game and giving it 10/10 as quickly as possible is the business model.
>all that disingenuous shit about Gone Home
It was praised because of the lesbian romance. You know this. It had nothing else going for it.
It's a breaking and entering sim set in the 90s. The "lesbian romance" is a plot point (if you can call it that, the game is just you rummaging through people's things). The "first ever lesbian character" hype was a meme from people looking for a reason to hate it without knowing anything about it beyond it not having a lose condition. "How can it be a game without a lose condition" was some good shit.
Stop being a disingenuous israelite. I’ve played it. It revolves entirely around the lesbian romance.
How can that be the case when the main character isn't a lesbian and you read about three other characters.
>how can a story revolve around someone you don’t play as
I agree the Cinemaphileeddit reaction to Gone Home was absurdly overblown and sparked what is now over a decade of the most moronic game/story discourse ever seen, but you are doing some nasty historical revisionism if you think the primary reasons for its praise weren't for how "real" it was when it depicted a Lesbian Teen In The 90s Being Sad. The entire game, part and parcel, is about digging through your family's memories and piecing together how their Lesbian Daughter Got Sad and then Found Love.
You're right, I got caught up in how that main plot doesn't lead you around by the nose as you're free to go and read what you want and got caught up in the mom and dad subplot.
The lesbianism being part of it's praise is true too, but that's because it gave journos something to write about. It wasn't the only thing going for it, if wasn't a VN, so not all the praise came from that and no one called it the first.
>It wasn't the only thing going for it
It was absolutely the reason why the game got such a old, overblown praise. It’s been a decade, stop lying.
It's not because it's a game of exploring a house and going through people's shit like a creep in the 90s. The graphics were good and the house looked real. The method of how the story is told like you're solving a mystery and the fact that the ending was always there, you could accendentally rummage your way to it, made it unique and creative. The romance of characters you don't see or interact with means there's more to talk about than just the romance.
Okay, keep lying then. Keep using colorful language to make walking around a house seem worthy of praise.
Frick off, people were mislead thought it's a horror game.
This is how a blank canvas gets sold as some incredible work of art. Lying, disingenuous homosexuals typing out paragraphs to make it seem deep and profound. Gone Home is garbage, your initial impression was correct.
It was atmospheric and a mystery, if you thought it was horror you were absolutely correct because it was about 90s lesbianism.
A well made 90s house breaking and entering sim is fine. Story telling through finding notes and piecing it together freely without being led around on rails is pretty good. I'm not saying it's worth of all the praise, it's just good at accomplishing what it set out to do. It's a genre of game that some may hate. There are genres of movies and music I hate but I understand there are different audiences with different tastes. Breaking into a house and finding out about to 90s people who live there through going through there stuff in no linear fashion isn't for everyone and that's fine.
>yet another paragraph of colorful language to make it seem better than it is
Are you using ChatGPT? How many more of these can you possibly write?
It's not colorful, it's pretty straight forward. A breaking and entering sim set in the 90s is fun. Piecing together a story in no linerear fashion is fun. If I explained the appeal of jigsaw puzzles and chess, you'd accuse me of just using colorful language.
Now do one without the letter ‘e’.
Does anyone have a mega for this show?
Working on it!
Maybe another half hour before I post it
don't waste your time
https://mega.nz/folder/k6RymDyD#N2suIV0-JKVIbQ2XRv71Ig
Whoa this was exactly what I was gonna do without the captions, nice anon!
Jesus this thread almost makes me ashamed to be right wing
I'm Libertarian so I really don't care. Its just stupid to see morons bring politics into threads about a pre school show.
It is political though, the people behind it said this is in response to things like Gonzo wearing a dress in Muppet Babies. Artistic freedom means there's a chance an alien weirdo character may put on a dress. Confining yourself around the politics of your audience means guaranteeing programming where dresses are only worn by characters you've been assured are biological females.
Have you not watched it? I've seen a clip and I've not found even an ounce of political shit in it. What let me guess having a family is to extreme now? Like get the frick over it. Its a pre school show. Even if the creators are on the right at least they aren't shoving it in my face like the left does. Not everything needs a political explanation to it. Its a fricking cartoon.
I just told you that the reason of the streaming service is to ensure parents they won't see an alien guy wear a dress. I'm fine with families, Lilo and Stitch is too extreme for them.
Bro nobody cares. That gonzo shit was made to get reactions out of people. if this show did the same thing people on the left would be screaming Transphobia. Like if you enjoy the cartoon just fricking enjoy it. stop thinking about politics all the fricking time.
They cared enough to make an entire children's line up with political org money. It's fine to talk about politics in this case.
>They cared enough to make an entire children's line up with political org money.
Look into your side before you throw accusations m'kay?
It's not an accusation, it's a fact though. Cartoon Network and Nick Jr. aren't the Mother Jones network. This is part of Daily Wire and is politics first.
Have any episodes pushed an “agenda” yet? I’ve seen nothing from the show itself being anything other than some generic preschool show.
The agenda is to provide conservative parents something that won't create any awkward challenges of their values like gays existing or anything that can be seen as a challenge to gender norms like "girl power". It's like if you see a gay couple you assume there is an agenda and if you see a heterosexual couple, you likely won't assume agenda. Which is funny because with native birthrates down, even Japan has a "have sex initiative". A straight family done because family comedy sells and is easy to write is one thing, Daily Wire "we need more white teen pregnancy" conservative trad wife types making a family comedy for a conservative programming streaming service is a little different. But it won't be seen that way to most because it's fun to see what you like as cool and neutral and what you don't like as forced and an attack.
>like gays existing
Just watch My Little Pony G1, G3, G4 (except 2 episodes in s09, but it's so subtle even Russia didn't bother censoring it), G5 then.
Oh no, children won't get to see men in dresses. What a loss.
You can always just watch every single other cartoon if this bothers you. It's not like there's a shortage of 'em.
It's the people who keep calling anyone who isn't impressed by the show "troony liberals". Do I think it's based for conservatives to make a cartoon? Hell yeah. But I'm not going to pretend the show isn't just a boring generic kids show I couldn't get any enjoyment out of as an adult.
>ctrl+f “troony liberals”
>1 result (You)
>a bunch of Leftoids whining about a preschool show and getting BTFO’d
>“le im ashamed to be le right wing (tm)”
Kek?
The meltdowns are hilarious and I'm glad the cartoon makes trannies seethe hard. But you think anyone who is just disappointed that if we're finally getting a conservative cartoon it could've been more interesting is one of those types of people.
>Watch the Moby Dick episode
>Chilli isn't wearing the whale costume
It alright
It’s bland and generic but it alright
It reminds me of me show which is better
But same show more or less
It's amazing to see posters so autistic that they make birchy look like the sane, rational person.
That's genuinely impressive.
Frick off, birchy.
That happens to guy in AI threads. Broken clocks.
These past few weeks I noticed how based he is. I don't even know which political side he's on.
>namehomosexualry
Letfybros?? How did we lose to a cartoon chinchilla???
Family values is the only thing modern conservatism had that isn't bloodthirsty and cruel. They were right to go the Bluey route instead of the Super Shapiro vs. Antifa Decepticons route
>bloodthirsty and cruel
Does not wanting children to be sterilized fit under that umbrella? What about believing that America has the right to control its own border? Or maybe believing that citizens have the right to defend themselves? All truly horrific beliefs held by modern conservatives.
I watched an entire generation of American men turn pro-Taliban before my eyes, nothing you say can convince me the modern right isn't utterly demented and desperate.
>facts won't convince me
Yeah, I figured.
Your feelings aren't facts.
As somebody who is Libertarian I've seen both of you frickers change sides so many fricking times. Don't act like yours is superior same goes for the right. Like both of you support shit if it pisses the other off. Yall are so fricking predictable at this point.
>I watched an entire generation of American men turn pro-Taliban before my eyes
You can really tell this poster is white and lives in a sheltered suburb.
Probably a zoomer too.
People in America have been cheering on the Taliban since before the Taliban were the Taliban.
Hell, black separatists were cheering on the Taliban right after 9/11.
>You can really tell this poster is white and lives in a sheltered suburb.
Probably a zoomer too.
Yeah these mfs wanna preach about how diverse and accepting they are but they have never stepped foot in the hood. Cause in the hood nobody gives a single frick about politics. People are more worried about food and supporting their families than about some dumb shit that has no impact on them personally. I know, I left that shit, still poor as shit but its getting better. which is why it pisses me off when these frickers donate to shit like BLM instead of just giving it to black communities that actually need it.
>Cause in the hood nobody gives a single frick about politics. People are more worried about food and supporting their families than about some dumb shit that has no impact on them personally.
Pretty much.
This histrionic obsession over perceived political beliefs and behaviors is such obvious suburbanite college kid shit that it's hilarious.
No one else has time to care about that stupid bullshit.
Yeah when the Talibs fought the Soviets, not their own fricking country, dipshit.
>not their own fricking country
Anon, I'm gonna blow your mind.
There are people who live in America, who have American citizenship, who do not like America.
There are people who live in America, Americans by birth, who do not agree with what America does on the world stage.
I know this is baffling to someone like you, who's never stepped foot outside of your gated community/college campus, but believe it or not, not everyone in this country is on "your side."
You call them Talibs when you like them?
>shopped pic
That dedication was never made. No copy of the movie that includes that exists.
>"it was removed after 9/11"
It's much older than 9/11 and there is no proof of those words being on the movie. Yes, you can assume Rambo teamed up with them even though they were unnamed, but the words do not appear on any version.
Go frick off to /misc/ incel chud. This is why /misc/ needs to be deleted
>Or maybe believing that citizens have the right to defend themselves?
It's more like "Self-defense for me, but not for thee" when it comes to conservatives. When the Ukraine got invaded you guys expected them to just drop their weapons and surrender. Or how about shit like the Black Panther movement back in the 60s-70s? Agree with it, don't they also have a right to defend themselves?
When did Birchy become the most based person on this board?
>project has cute designs
>designs end up ugly by release
how does it always happen
They're trying to cut down on people watching for hot waifus and rule34'ing their shows. The fools. We'll remember the show longer than the target audience.
>We'll remember the show longer than the target audience.
Anon, that's not a good thing.
That's just how you end up with more Martha Says incidents when autists latch on to your children's show.
I'm gonna be honest with you I think these designs are more ugly then what we got
Yeah but it's got sovl
I guess I'm the only person who likes this cartoon and doesn't hate it for political reasons/or because it's a "bluey copycat"
And good for you. Thats how it should be. Frick the political shit.
Damn this thread is so active and yet barely anyone talks about the episodes themselves.
The mom doesn't wear pants
or a skirt
or underwear
From what I've heard, it somehow manages to be worse at upholding conservative family values than Bluey. Weirdly pointless product.
>worse at upholding conservative family values than Bluey
In what way?
The dad's a comic relief idiot husband sitcom character. Exactly the kind of shit people like Ben Shapiro have been complaining about for years. Confusing that he produced it.
Well that's a legit criticism if it's true, unlike everything else in this thread.
>dad's a comic relief idiot husband sitcom character
Unironically the worst trope to ever exist and I can't believe it's still a thing.
>Unironically the worst trope to ever exist and I can't believe it's still a thing.
Because execs in the media industry want to portray a father as a bumbling idiot, incompetent at his job and/or lazy that's just used for cheap and braindead comedy. They want to degrade the family unit rather than show them in a positive light. It becomes borderline propaganda if not already.
Yes, which raises the question of how Ben Shapiro wound up doing the trope himself. Yes, yes, I never thought he was serious about his stated ideals, but surely being a public ideologue demands some bare minimum level of consistency?
I supposed it's the fact that mainstream conservatives don't care to preserve such values. They grift so hard that at the end of the day they just hand their ideals on a silver plater to their supposed enemies. It reminds of a phrase:
>"Conservatives are nothing more than liberals from 5 years ago"
>Even ripping off Bluey's house
literally what the actual frick?
Whos willing to bet that everyone in pic related is going to get barred from working in the professional industry ever again for the heinous crime of working on a chuddy cartoon?
Oh frick they managed to get Laura Osnes in on it? I was going to say that surely only people already barred from the industry (or who don't care) would work on it, but she surprised me.
Imagine getting barred from the industry just to voice Cum Cum Chilla
Rob schnieders already blacklisted from hollywood for the crime of wrongthink i dont even think sandler is friends with him anymore this is the only show thatll hire him
>wrongthink
From a scale of
>I voted republican
To
>It did not happen, but it should have!
How wrong was it?
Also, fun on-topic fact: the bab chinchilla is voiced by the co-creators 4-year-old son.
Pro Jan 6
Its times like those where Im convinced that were living in a Drawn Together episode. A mob of repubs cosplay as buffaloes and take a guided tour of the White House convinced that it would allow the israelite Producer (formerly Bucky Bucks) to stay in there instead of a senile pedophile whilst the dems prop the event up as the new shoah despite the kill count of the former not even holding a wet match to the latter. Surprised that this is the reason why Chum Chum is voiced by a B-list celeb.
Back to the topic at hand, would you believe that picrel is from the seventh episode?
>Surprised that this is the reason why Chum Chum is voiced by a B-list celeb.
I'm more confused by Laura Osnes, as I'm not aware of her having ever suffered from political controversy before. It sounds like her career took a downturn for unrelated economic reasons (she's mostly a theatre actress and that sector got hit hard by covid). Also apparently she might have secretly been a Mormon this entire time? What the frick?
"The crime of wrongthink" = being anti-gay, anti-vaccine, and pro-Jan 6th. Hollywood is homosexual and he pushes the "gays are groomers" narrative. It's fine to not want to associate with someone who harms you.
>guided tour
One of the latest sentenced broke in with a megaphone and was trying to organize the rioters by telling them what they need to do "if they want to take the building". T was absurd to think it was just a tour before, but now you're just being a dishonest piece of shit.
>being anti-gay
He isn't.
>anti-vaccine
the coof shot was ineffective and the global psyop to push it was one of the most eye opening affairs in modern history
>pro Jan 6th
Based, the government does not deserve respect. Unless you condemn the Palestinian insurrection that just took place there yesterday you're full of shit.
>Hollywood is homosexual
It is
>gays are groomers
Most aren't but the more influential ones inarguably are.
>it's fine not to want to associate with someone who harms you
tell me your feelings about Israel and Palestine so we can all laugh at this statement.
We've seen the footage. One Fed with a bullhorn doesn't change that.
You've seen a guy waving in other officers to relocate at the capitol because they couldn't hold that line. They were too far out and spread out. More than one person had their cameras out, there is another angle showing the officers he was waving at. You have more footage of people breaking in, climbing through windows, and fighting cops.
As I said, we’ve seen the footage. After the Summer of Love anyone with two brain cells isn’t impressed by some shoving and broken windows.
Black person riots weren't aiming to overturn an election where methods and motives were clear and proven. A disruption to the certification process had a chance ensuring Trump stayed president. Multiple people have been sentenced because they admitted that was their intention and social media posts or what was said at the scene supported what they admitted to.
>b-but le elected officials got scared!! That makes it worse!!
You’re not convincing anyone.
It doesn't matter what scares or threatens you, people are being prosecuted like it was any other crime.
It's not illegal to own a crowbar.
It's not illegal to say you want to rob a bank.
It can be illegal to say that you want to rib a bank with a crowbar, talk to your friend about your plan, and then go out and buy a crowbar.
The people being sentenced are way beyond that third example as they were caught mid robbery. No amount of "bank systems are afraid of crowbar??" changes that and letting them go gives a signal of "go back and try harder next time".
Didn’t read. You already failed to convince anyone that Gone Home was good and your endless, rambling paragraphs aren’t convincing anyone that the nothingburger that was Jan 6 was anything else, or that a broken window is worse than a burned neighborhood because of muh election.
I suggest you run away again.
>b-but that wasn’t me-
Run.
You're just showing everyone here your position requires wilful ignorance and brainrot. Thank you.
See
Everything’s been covered already.
>Didn't read.
Yes, it's wilful ignorance and brainrot, just as I said. You're making me look more correct. I really appreciate that.
See
Everything’s been covered already.
>muh election more important than what damage was actually done
If your election is actually threatened by some boomers taking a guided tour, your system is doomed anyway.
Hey anon, let me walk around inside of your house for a while. I know you don't know me or what my intentions are, but just let me in and let me walk around. What are you scared of? You're not seriously scared of a random stranger walking around inside of your house, right? So just let me in.
>Black person riots weren't aiming to overturn an election where methods and motives were clear and proven.
>implying that MAGA fanatics aren't Black folk
A minor quibble. Based trips though.
>Because when girls are annoying it tiptoes the line of still being adorable/cute
ok pedo
What you're describing IS "that" reason, you've just repressed it.
I mean, I guess there's an alternative, but I'm assuming you're not some kind of man-hating feminist.
The most based user in the board.
The most cringe user in the board.
Very based
Very cringe.
The most based
The most cringe, just like you.
Should've been less of a Bluey ripoff, but I understand why they did
Whats the reason? Bluey is apolitical, it makes no sense to make a "conservative alternative" to it.
>Whats the reason?
Bluey is one of the biggest hits in kids tv
at last, my masterpiece is complete
help I've never seen a moment of either of these shows but this picture is making me laugh my ass off
BE YOUR OWN YOU
Why cant we be friends? - sung by WAR
The dads are gay
Now draw Bluey and Chip kissing.
Now all we need is a truck being driven off a cliff
I just heard of it today, Ethan emailed us about it
I hope it boosts his standing in the industry, we need more of us to balance out all the... them.
but obviously I have no interest in a baby show for babies.
>Dailywire+ israelite Propaganda.
Wow, That's like a 'yikes' and 'unpoggin' from me sistah.
the dads kind of hot...
Yeah I'm disappointed the threads gone this long without a lick of porn.
I would prefer the siblings rather then the dad
Who's gonna be first
don't know who will make the first, but it's going to be the brother and sister fricking.
Imagine fricking him in the ass
finished watching the episodes
its a good show, narratively it has differences from bluey and you actually have kids acting more badly which bluey fails to do
kind of sucks they changed the art style to emulate bluey
like the character design ill give a pass but the backgrounds and environment feel too much of a ripoff
any mega yet? don't live in the US.
Jesus Christ the political brainrot is real.
Whats going on in this thread? I just wanted to discuss a cartoon about chinchillas.
>a cartoon chinchilla destroyed leftism and caused all of the Leftoids ITT to devolve into a blubbering mess on the floor
Kek
This is eerily reminding me of that Johnny test hate art
No matter the subject, art like this will ALWAYS be cringe.
>let’s beat up this innocent child because he’s associated with the wrong side
Leftists never fail to amaze.
>Daily Wire keeps calling gays groomers
>the first Daily Wire cartoon was about how Indians deserve genocide and the world is better for it
lol
>groomers are called groomers
>they do, but I’m assuming you’re lying (as usual)
Lol
You’re lying, there no way they’re that based.
family guy dead pose
>You guys are le bad!
They do realize Bluey is just a rip off of Berenstain Bears right? Any children's cartoon with a family could claim Bluey ripped them off.
This whole "NUH UH WE DID IT FIRST" argument is fricking stupid why can't both shows just exist like anime. I hate living in the West with this stupid leftist culture.
Mama Bear > Chilli > Chinny
I have seen the light.
>rightwingers get their own platform to create
>Bargain bin tier shows
And now I will never take any /misc/ack seriously when they complain about woke stuff cuz I know they'd just create something like this
>Advertise as an anti woke alternative to destroy leftist corporation
>Content is bland, derivative and expensive
Why can't they make anything interesting?
Because the goal is just to existence as something that promises to no gays. The bar is set so low, all that's left to do is to follow some pre-established formula.
In bigger picture sense, returning to tradition means copying older styles.
Rightists by definition can't be creative, having larger amygdala does that to you. rightists can on get joy from violence and destruction and I suspect the social conflicts from wwii onward have happened because there are less wars.
Ok, so I just saw one episode from the mega link chosen at random and I have a few critiques
>The animation is too stiff like peppa pig
>The color pallet is too much not something I can see for extended periods
>The intro feels like it's an action movie
>No relatability at all
>Too preachy at times
>The kids don't feel like kids, they feel like pre-teens except the youngest one
>The parents don't feel as authentic while playing the kids games
>The lesson that's learnt doesn't feel natural
Excluding the political narrative, I can't think of more, but it's fair amount.
>DeviantART tier digital art
>Washed out colours
>No shading
>Copy-pasted characters with lifeless eyes
It could have the most interesting storylines ever written, but I will not give it a chance because the visuals are so off-putting.
Leftoids lost this thread HARD.
Both sides did. Like its just a fricking cartoon. Its funny and sad at the same time.
>Oh look at me. I'm le superior intellectual with superior taste. I'm totally not sucking my own dick
Take your ass back to the shitty AI thread with your shitty reaction folder. You're just as obnoxious as the others namehomosexual
He's got a point though. Why are people unable to keep politics out of discussions about pre-school shows?
Stop sucking your own dick. You already said that shit several posts ago
You aren't answering the question. Why are people unable to keep politics out of cartoon discussions? No need to get schizo.
Trump lost.
Then you have something in common with him 😉
I voted for Biden, I got what I wanted. Can you say the same?
Yep, a bunch of seething Leftoids ITT. Kek.
Hey I'm gonna give you advice homosexual so listen. If you wanna really make em mad just ignore them. Constantly doing the "Lul so mad?" shit is just gonna make them frick with you more. Ignoring is the best frick you to somebody. It works too, because they end up looking like jackasses themselves.
But I have a giant grin on my face, anon.
Shit-Shilla Sucks
I wish they kept the hand drawn animation.
At least it would have stood out than the cheap tweening shit.
I guess people aren't gonna shut up about the bluey comparisons. It's reached the news now
https://www.dailywire.com/news/jeremy-boreing-debunks-silly-notion-that-new-bentkey-kids-show-chip-chilla-is-conservative-version-of-bluey
Gee, maybe they should have stuck with the much more distinct and less deriviative style they initially had. Worth noting that the co-creator Ethan Nicolle is alrady an established animator/artist, so this is definitely a top down decision (which also fricks over this moronic theory
)