classic who was made for people who bought the telegraph from woolworths and got a free dvd with some black and white crap on it, that's my exposure to classic who anyway
Classic Who was made for children but became gradually more family oriented, meaning there was something for adults.
Starting with the 3rd onwards every Doctor has one or multiple sexy women as companions. Having something for "Dads and Lads" was the philosophy.
I don't recall them ever pandering to women the way NuWho does but idk what the 70s-80's British woman really wanted to see. Maybe they liked Romana 2 getting dressed up like a barbie every episode.
How is this good for advertising? telling your fanbase the show isn't for you. What do they have to gain from this? Are they playing 4d chess? I don't fricking understand how alienated apart of your audience is a good thing.
It's not really complicated to understand, the dedicated fanbases for this sort of stuff are small potatoes in overall market share terms. What producers want to do is always be bringing in new eyeballs onto IPs and the easiest way to do that is to be provocative and rage-baity. If you make leftists on Twitter get publicly upset, right-wing morons reflexively consume your product. If you make right wingers on Twitter get publicly upset, left-wing morons reflexively consume it instead. And then there's the hate watch phenomenon that let's you double dip a bit and lots of normies will just check something out if there is enough back and forth internet autism drama and, again, the easiest way to do it is with political/social fault lines.
I never even watched Dr.Who and only now of it from here, but like anything nerdy it was in fact created by and made for white nerds.
We will however keep winning because we consistently make new content that we like and is universally liked, we will be fine. In fact it's going to allow for a newer and better show to be created due to necessity. That show will eventually be taken over by people who can't create their own content, but that's fine, all good things come to an end as they should. I look forward to the next good season 1.5 of whatever show before it gets ruined.
The only people I have ever met that likes dr who are chicks
She works for a newspaper and has nothing to do with doctor who or the bbc, you drooling moron. She's just another seething, racist poc 'journalist' with a platform.
This show has always been garbage. I don't know why people pretend its not.
Its basically just cope. Companies release this when they are getting criticism for their woke choices that don't make sense, its basically a way of saying, your opinion is invalid because its not for you, and any poor reviews are just bad faith.
i assume she made posts like this on her personal social media without any pushback for years so when she was appointed in a professional role, she didn't think it would be a problem
I doubt every writer has access to publish tweets from the main magazine account. So at least one editor saw this and approved it for publication, also editors often come up with the headline too.
In a year she'll write another "article" blasting straight white men for causing the show to fail due to their racism. It's the BBC so I don't expect a course correction even if zero people watch it.
I never even watched Dr.Who and only now of it from here, but like anything nerdy it was in fact created by and made for white nerds.
We will however keep winning because we consistently make new content that we like and is universally liked, we will be fine. In fact it's going to allow for a newer and better show to be created due to necessity. That show will eventually be taken over by people who can't create their own content, but that's fine, all good things come to an end as they should. I look forward to the next good season 1.5 of whatever show before it gets ruined.
Everything about the culture war revolves around their hatred of straight white men and the desire to invade, infest and destroy everything we care about with deliberate malicious intent as they are evil and rotten to the fricking core!!!FACT!!!
>THING YOU LIKE WAS ALWAYS WOKE
I'm not a bong but i can summarize this debate for people that weren't there >Old progressivist television >Meritocratically hired writers who used clever scripts to comment on social issues, and would write characters with opposing viewpoints at least somewhat empathetically even when they are proved to be wrong. This would be cross-referenced by writers with a myriad of backgrounds and social/political views to make sure it was at least reasonable for all sides to empathize with. Examples include Star Trek, Boondocks, All in the Family >New progressivist television >Written by DEI hires who are not skilled enough to write with nuance, so they bellow their personal views directly to the audience. Conservatives aren't allowed so everything is cross referenced by a yes-men culture of exactly one political view (liberal trust-fund women).
Correct. Doctor Who was always for gays and women
nope, it was for children
all children are gays and women
uh, no
classic who was too boring for children and had no romance, women weren't the target either
it was a man's show for men, a true male kino
classic who was made for people who bought the telegraph from woolworths and got a free dvd with some black and white crap on it, that's my exposure to classic who anyway
It was a ground breaking long form sci-fi mystery show that became famous because it was great. It has nothing to do with modern Doctor Who.
>it was a man's show for men
nope, it was always a kids show
Classic Who was made for children but became gradually more family oriented, meaning there was something for adults.
Starting with the 3rd onwards every Doctor has one or multiple sexy women as companions. Having something for "Dads and Lads" was the philosophy.
I don't recall them ever pandering to women the way NuWho does but idk what the 70s-80's British woman really wanted to see. Maybe they liked Romana 2 getting dressed up like a barbie every episode.
Correct. I only watch good sci-fi.
They deleted their Twitter and the article and the pajeet b***h privated all her socials, I bet BBC did not like this type of "publicity" one bit.
>I bet BBC did not like this type of "publicity" one bit.
oh they love it
>here's how bullying caused death threats and a brave women had to delete her twitter
>and how it relates to gamergate
How is this good for advertising? telling your fanbase the show isn't for you. What do they have to gain from this? Are they playing 4d chess? I don't fricking understand how alienated apart of your audience is a good thing.
are you suggesting the bbc commissioned her to write the article as some form of disguised advertisement
It's not really complicated to understand, the dedicated fanbases for this sort of stuff are small potatoes in overall market share terms. What producers want to do is always be bringing in new eyeballs onto IPs and the easiest way to do that is to be provocative and rage-baity. If you make leftists on Twitter get publicly upset, right-wing morons reflexively consume your product. If you make right wingers on Twitter get publicly upset, left-wing morons reflexively consume it instead. And then there's the hate watch phenomenon that let's you double dip a bit and lots of normies will just check something out if there is enough back and forth internet autism drama and, again, the easiest way to do it is with political/social fault lines.
People like OP help these marketers.
ty
The only people I have ever met that likes dr who are chicks
She works for a newspaper and has nothing to do with doctor who or the bbc, you drooling moron. She's just another seething, racist poc 'journalist' with a platform.
Journalists are just paid shills since gamergate.
This show has always been garbage. I don't know why people pretend its not.
Its basically just cope. Companies release this when they are getting criticism for their woke choices that don't make sense, its basically a way of saying, your opinion is invalid because its not for you, and any poor reviews are just bad faith.
>This show has always been garbage.
That's where you're wrong, kiddo.
i assume she made posts like this on her personal social media without any pushback for years so when she was appointed in a professional role, she didn't think it would be a problem
I doubt every writer has access to publish tweets from the main magazine account. So at least one editor saw this and approved it for publication, also editors often come up with the headline too.
>I'd argue the show has always been socially-progressive and inclusive
>BUT NOT FOR YOU STRAIGHT WHITE MEN!
>giving attention to clickbait articles
>an entire fricking thread at that
have a nice day
See
They don’t want attention. It is why they deleted everything.
Then don't get mad when I don't watch it and it bombs.
In a year she'll write another "article" blasting straight white men for causing the show to fail due to their racism. It's the BBC so I don't expect a course correction even if zero people watch it.
They always do it. That pic of the Charlie's Angel tweet comes to mind.
they stealth edited the title
Geee. they USED to have a twitter account. what happened?
I'm so happy this brown woman is here to tell us what our tv shows -that were created before she was born- are for
I never even watched Dr.Who and only now of it from here, but like anything nerdy it was in fact created by and made for white nerds.
We will however keep winning because we consistently make new content that we like and is universally liked, we will be fine. In fact it's going to allow for a newer and better show to be created due to necessity. That show will eventually be taken over by people who can't create their own content, but that's fine, all good things come to an end as they should. I look forward to the next good season 1.5 of whatever show before it gets ruined.
That's okay. He's a black homosexual. he'll be dead by next year.
>we want the gay n-words from outerspace audience
Everything about the culture war revolves around their hatred of straight white men and the desire to invade, infest and destroy everything we care about with deliberate malicious intent as they are evil and rotten to the fricking core!!!FACT!!!
Doctor Who was always ass anyway, they can have it.
the gays can have doctor who and we get videogames back
Doctor Hutu
This is an AI article with an AI author. This person isn't even real.
>did you know this Bong show for bongs, was for homosexual bongs?
Yes, as an American I have never seen a single episode of Dr. Literally Who
>Dr. Literally Who
You sir, are based.
Also that is an atrocious salute from George C. Scott. The hand and forearm are supposed to be parallel.
>THING YOU LIKE WAS ALWAYS WOKE
I'm not a bong but i can summarize this debate for people that weren't there
>Old progressivist television
>Meritocratically hired writers who used clever scripts to comment on social issues, and would write characters with opposing viewpoints at least somewhat empathetically even when they are proved to be wrong. This would be cross-referenced by writers with a myriad of backgrounds and social/political views to make sure it was at least reasonable for all sides to empathize with. Examples include Star Trek, Boondocks, All in the Family
>New progressivist television
>Written by DEI hires who are not skilled enough to write with nuance, so they bellow their personal views directly to the audience. Conservatives aren't allowed so everything is cross referenced by a yes-men culture of exactly one political view (liberal trust-fund women).