New clip with Buster and Plucky fighting over who tops, first 10 episodes drop next Thursday
https://twitter.com/cartoonnetwork/status/1696961056617144733
New clip with Buster and Plucky fighting over who tops, first 10 episodes drop next Thursday
https://twitter.com/cartoonnetwork/status/1696961056617144733
I'm not excited.
Cringe filename. I was about to talk about the bad animation but why does Buster sound like that?
Ok Buster
>Fighting for the top bunk
Aren't they supposed to be in college now? Weird argument for older teens
Out of all things to complain about. You complain on something that's in character between the two.
What college has fricking bunkbeds?
my old college, actually.
More common then you think, especially if 3 people are staying in one dorm
This isn't cherrypicking either, this is the second result if you search college dorm on google. Not much further down you see proper bunk beds too
Genuine question, how do normalgays even survive being observed all the time? How can you live in a room with other people? You can't even watch porn in peace or mind your own business without buttholes asking what you do or wanting you to socialize with them.
You get a roommate who is either not around or really autistic
>You can't even watch porn in peace
You hold in your urge until you're in your dorm and your roommate is not
Most of us grew up with siblings so it's nowhere we haven't been before. It's also super cheap and you save a lot of money. When you realize most decent apartments are $1,000 to $1,500 in most places near decent jobs, you begin to appreciate how much you save sharing a space.
Yes, I'd love to not need to share the space but at the time I just appreciated having a cheap and convenient place to sleep.
>not establishing dominance by putting porn on and inviting your roommate to join
How do you even climb into bed? Do you climb up the side like a monkey and then just drop 5ft out of bed when you wake up or is there a ladder you pull out behind the bed that you hook up to the opening above?
Anon, you never did a large long jump from the floor to your top bunk bed
You're kind of coming off as more ignorant about college than anyone else here is. Most college dorm rooms are fricking miniscule and they have bunkbeds to save space in rooms with two students. I had more than a few doubles when I was in the dorms and all of them had bunk beds, it's REALLY common.
Sorry I didn’t go get brainwashed by the libs
No wonder this gen acts like children they stay that way
you never watched a frat movie?
>libs
God I didn't think online brainwashing was this bad
College life is awesome. You will definitely find a group of people who share your
obscure interests and have the best conversations and friendships of your life.
You're really missing out
I went to Kent State, one of the most liberal universities in the US
None of that culture war stuff is an actual thing. People are chill.
unless he gets a scholarship it's not worth the tuition just to make fricking friends lol
If you have the money for dorm life, it’s worth it. And state schools like Kent are on the cheaper side of things. Plus, scholarships for public schools are much easier to consistently get than private ones.
you're better off starting off at community college and transferring if you have no idea what you want to major in. you'd also be surprised how many people with obscure autistic interests work retail, i'm still friends with a bunch
>you'd also be surprised how many people with obscure autistic interests work retail,
You'd be surprised by how unsurprised i am that niche hobby autists are trapped in retail
i bet you'd be even more unsurprised to find they all have useless degrees lol
How many of them have useless degrees but alsofeel destined for greatness. The old actress/rock star dream
>Kent State
>one of the most liberal universities in the US
>Sorry I didn’t go get brainwashed by the libs
>>anon was actually right
jesus christ
>Weird argument for older teens
You must so out of fricking touch if you think teen and collage age guys don't fighting about this type of shit. I think the internet has shown just because you're old doesn't mean you're mature.
I didn't even know colleges had beds. Why do americans live in their schools?
Their parents are desperate to pawn them off, they're in a stage where they want independence without knowing the full implications of it...wait until you find out about boarding schools and military schools
Yeah but living with others in a room is even less independent, sounds like prison to me.
>military schools
I mean there it makes sense at least. But otherwise every city has schools so people that absolutely want to move out just rent an own one-room apartment in that case.
>sounds like prison to me
It's common knowledge college is the time these kids drink and frick like animals, and then spend their 20s wokescolding and begging for debt forgiveness on Twitter.
I stayed at home when I was in school because I'm too autistic for that much socialization and I didn't want to go several thousand dollars more into debt for "the college experience".
Yeah I know for sure I would kill myself and at least three other people if I had to live in what is basically a school for a week. I was happy when school has ended when I was 16, but in hindsight I should have dragged it on for more years. Jobs take 8 hours instead of 4-6h like schools and you cannot draw comics during that time. Also if someone bullied as a kid you could lash back without risking of being sued for it. Good times.
I lived on campus (none of my friends did, as they stayed home and commuted) because I wanted the frick out of my home life and to have some actual freedom for once.
College dorm life can be great if you are a social person and you get to experience a lot of shit you wouldn't if you were commuting back and forth. The only people who don't commute are buttholes who are scared to move beyond their high school social clique and are afraid of being away from mom and dad for 24 hours.
Okay now I know you've gotta be trolling me, colleges outside America absolutely have fricking DORMS. Sometimes it has a different name like Resident Hall or whatever but they are THERE.
Colleges aren't even a thing outside of anglo countries. There are just schools and universities.
Yeah, and those universities also have housing.
They rent cheap apartments for young adults that study yeah but I have never heard of people sleeping in the same room. You can't even game or shitpost till 3am because one homosexual would surely be the loser that wants to go to bed at 11pm.
Colleges aren't everywhere; a lot of people have to travel to a new town or city or even state to go to college. And as a result, colleges offer room and board packages for people to live on campus, so they don't have to deal with the added financial burden of having to find an apartment and living expenses, when you just add that price to the price of classes that is covered by loans, grants, scholarships.
The only colleges that don't offer room and board are community colleges.
There are community colleges with dorms.
Another victim of the GED to Cinemaphile pipeline
i hope that's not real
Hey my dad has a GED
And a Juris Doctorate
and a LLM
10/10 post. My face is red laughing too hard.
It's a metaphor for sex. They're going to make them gay.
I'm excited.
they seem too old to be fighting over a bunk bed
No matter how much they try to make it funny, the shitty animation just ruins it. You just can't have a visually engaging, slapstick-based cartoon with TTG-quality animation. It's like trying to have a drama with sitcom cameras and lighting. Even the best script would be ruined by that.
something struck me as odd about how the flags just stop being animated after they got put down. it really does hamper the 'cartoon' aspect when the animation is so dull and lifeless
Post some Tex Avery
>eating shit that's bouncing off the floor
>It's like trying to have a drama with sitcom cameras and lighting
Have you not heard of a soap opera?
Doesn't that prove his point? Soaps are shit.
They're very popular with their target demographic.
Old women?
And your typical soap operas are very cheesy and not that well made. General Hospital and House MD have a mountain separating them in terms of quality. Nobody is watching All My Children with the same critical acclaim as Breaking Bad or whatever. They're popular, but everyone knows what they are: junk TV.
This is a soulless reimagining of a 90s property, can't escape being junk.
If you don't think the original Tiny Toons had talented people who understood the medium and how to make appealing designs with good comedic slapstick timing, I don't know what to tell you.
The point is that both are labelled "dramas", but one is actually considered well made and the other is considered cheap TV. It's cheap because it uses the same techniques you would see in an episodic sitcom. Those techniques can work for comedies, but they will ALWAYS drag down a drama. Even if there is an actor who nailed it with a great monologue written by a talented writer, it loses so much impact when the editor throws in canned applause and swelling music.
The same logic is applied here. There might be people on the new Tiny Toons show who really have funny ideas for visual gags and situations, but the animation is so lifeless and static that it sucks out 70% of the comedic impact from it all.
>If you don't think the original Tiny Toons had talented people who understood the medium and how to make appealing designs with good comedic slapstick timing, I don't know what to tell you.
The reimagining is soulless, not the original property.
I thought you were implying the original is junk so the reboot was always going to be junk even if it was 100% faithful.
Are these even the same people? I don't know anybody that would watch breaking bad and daily soaps. Different demographics IMO and the people that like the latter usually take that shit super seriously.
>Implying Breaking Badgays don't take it super serious
I didn't imply that anywhere.
Soap operas are not popular because of their quality, camera work, lighting or anything like that
They are popular because of the story of the mature rich guy falling in love with the young poor girl, as always.
Even if they did, do you think the mongoloids behind this shitshow would actually have the talent to make anything good?
Nobody is willing to spend that much on animation anymore.
to be fair, this is the pilot episode, so of course it's going to have a bigger budget, it would be like cherrypicking animation from a cartoon's intro.
but that doesn't detract from the point of real Goof Troop still having more soul than this crap
Yeah even for Looney Tunes Cartoons the different studios they hired used varying levels of tweening.
Take me back, I hate it here
>inb4 some gay criticize old shows like goof troop or bonkers for being too well animated as a gotcha moment as a way to flip the tables on those who criticize nu-spongebob for doing tons of whacky faces per 1 normal expression
why do goofy's arms always switch from black to flesh-toned in this show?
if companies stopped hiring 20 writers per cartoon and just invested all that cash into animation instead, we'd at least be able to have pretty cartoons
cartoons really don't need that many writers
The original show had over 50 writers total, granted that was over 100 episodes and who knows how many individual segments.
233, according to Wikipedia.
Jesus Christ. I assume that most of those were one-off writers, but I'm pretty sure cartoons don't get that kinda budget to have both lots of writers and competent animation anymore.
Yeah imdb has the list https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0098929/fullcredits/?ref_=tt_cl_sm
Only nine writers contributed a double digit amount of episodes.
>but I'm pretty sure cartoons don't get that kinda budget to have both lots of writers and competent animation anymore.
Cartoon budgets per episode have not fallen. In 1990, Tiny Toon Adventures cost $350,000 per episode - the highest of its day. That's the equivalent of $818,606 today. $1 million per episode is the norm on bigger productions today.
What we've actually lost is efficiency and amortization of costs that you get from making 65 episodes of a cartoon per season, rather than 13. On top of that, the actual apportioning of the budget is out of balance. Producers and actors and even writers are paid too much per episode, yet they're poor because they're only doing 13 episodes. Animation studios are paid less per episode, yet they're doing okay financially because of how consolidated animation outsourcing has become.
A big order like 65 inevitably results in some really shoddily animated episodes, but a 22-26 episode order could be workable.
Not necessarily. We have more capacity than ever right now, and you're actually more likely to get consistent animation with large projects, because you are essentially sequestering an entire studio.
The real problem is that networks don't want to commit to the modern equivalent of 5 seasons all at once, and you also can't really do that anymore. In the age of syndication, you had a lot of buyers with a lot of airtime, and very few shows to buy. No one today shows 5 new episodes a week for 13 straight weeks anymore.
>No matter how much they try to make it funny, the shitty animation just ruins it
I'm not arguing against good animation here, and what I've seen of Looniversity is fricking atrocious. But in regards to visual gags, timing and misdirection are way more important, and modern cartoons are even more lacking in them. It's not just an animation problem, it's a script and storyboarding problem. It's a problem of proportions and restraint, of context and meaning. I hate to paraphrase John K, but he's right to say that pies hitting faces are not funny in and of themselves. (Ironically, he has fallen into this same trap with his over-the-top animations that have no context to make them funny.)
The best Road Runner cartoons don't focus on the goofy aftermath. In fact, they often pull away a tad too soon from the end. They cut before the smoke clears, as if it's unimportant. What makes the gags funny are how complex and meticulously planned Wiley's traps are, contrasted with how simply and easily they fail. Modern WB cartoons don't understand this, and Looniversity continues this trend. It's a standup comic who doesn't pause to give audiences time to laugh. It's a 4 minute song with a 3 minute drum solo. None of it feels right.
You say it a lot better than I could. There's something about the timing in modern cartoons that feels lacking, but it's very hard to put into words. All I know is that modern cartoons going for that more old school look like the Animaniacs reboot, Looniversity and the modern Looney Tunes short have a very uncanny look. Something is missing.
I actually think it's decent, I am just too old for those kinds of shows now. Wonder if kids nowadays are even watching that stuff. Even when I was a kid it wasn't very popular and most of us were busy with playing, gaming and watching darker shit in the 90s.
Between tiktok, youtube and videogames kids must be barely watching cartoons these days
Oh yeah I forgot that phones are a thing too. When I casually see a toddler outside they always stare on the phones nowadays since they are silent and won't demand anything when they're busy with it.
I totally missed the tiktok hype but if what people say is true most young people and even older ones are addicted to that.
Hell, I even had 30 year old friends that I lost to social media and youtube addiction.
Worst thing it hampers their development, my nephew is narcissistic little shit who throws a tantrum when he doesn't get what he wants , phone usually
Jesus Christ, those voices are horrible. If it weren't for Plucky's lisp they'd sound exactly the same.
What makes it weirder is that the guy playing Buster sounds more like OG Plucky, while Plucky just sounds like... a guy. The duck lisp is barely even there.
Why are they doing a college series for seven-year-olds? Is this propaganda to get them to want to go to school? I've been hearing increasingly adults smart enough to tell them to just go to trade school, which would certainly throw a wrench in the plan of acquiring as many shekels as possible from the working class.
Honestly this is something that pisses me off about a lot of cartoons. It seems like everything is mundane and real-life focused instead of being cool sci-fi, fantasy or generally wacky cartoony shit.
I don't think I ever liked a single cartoon with school setting as a kid or teen. I wanted fantastic stuff that didn't remind me of the dull reality.
It's just a silly premise.
>It's just a silly premise
Someone came up with the premise, and it doesn't make sense. This is beyond the normal "make cartoon for kids about school", which is still gay. Make cartoon for kids about college? The experience where the majority of it you can absolutely not put into a cartoon for kids?
The only thing I can think of is the Dexter's Lab episode. "PARTY NOW STUDY LATER!"
It's not a real college. It's cartoon college.
Read morons.
>Make cartoon for kids about college? The experience where the majority of it you can absolutely not put into a cartoon for kids?
Erin couldn't make a show about middle-schoolers putting on Drag Shows.
>I've been hearing increasingly adults smart enough to tell them to just go to trade school
Based. Every fricking butthole wants to study nowadays, either for status bullshit reasons or because they refuse to work as anything but managers and other 10000 EUR jobs and we have no workers anymore. The same people aren't even able to do normal jobs anymore, they cannot even use a hammer, they are dumb and they are usually fat and mentally ill too so they either have to take breaks non-stop or get a panic attack if you give them an order.
I cannot remember much of the original series anymore, but were they even in school back then?
I only remember random shenanigans in the nature and some towns, cannot recall any school scenes.
Acme Looniversity was a prominent part of the series and intro. Though it wasn't a university, just a middle/high school.
Okay my fault then. Too long ago that I have seen it. Thank you, that makes more sense now.
Though I am a bit confused about the target audience now. If they graduated it implies that they want the series to be relatable to older fans, but the series itself is still written for kids. So you basically have kids and kid jokes in an adult setting I assume which sounds quite bizarre.
The showrunner knows nothing about cartoons or cartooning and is just making something she thinks kids will like based on her own feelings.
Funny enough, that's the original too
Nah, there are many things you can criticize Tom Ruegger for but the guy earned his way up in animation.
They were but the show barely held onto that concept and just about entirely abandoned all school aspects very quickly for random variety show shit so you aren't remembering wrong
This new one is playing very straight with the school aspect though
>but were they even in school back then?
?si=3xbxaAhMzR5LZZqr&t=44
In Tiny Toons, Acme University was a stand-in for high school with the characters having parents and being around 13-14 years old.
The current reboot is explicitly being made into a college metaphor because, for the bulk of the people making the new TT show, college was the happiest time of their lives and they desperately want to go go back there and are using the show as a means to relive their glory days at Calarts.
Also, because the rumor is that they want to make Buster gay and the only way they could get approval to do it, was to make the characters young adults.
The leaked drag episode laid the gay allegories on thick tbh
The drag show skit becomes slightly more acceptable now that Buster is an adult, if he was still 14 they'd have got a lot of shit and probably still will
>if he was still 14 they'd have got a lot of shit and probably still will
That got a lot of shit and that was before the moral panic on drag shows
And also didn't involve his teacher doing it with him
The amount of people happy with how progressive it was vastly outweighed the other side and its moral panic. It was apparently viewed well enough to even get made in the first place and not have its episode pulled. So I'm sure it would be fine even if Buster was a teen.
That wasn't sexualized, though. Buster literally goes down a runway and pole dances with Bugs in the leak.
>That wasn't sexualized, though.
It was fricking gay though
It'll get budlighted.
Can't, promised I'd never watch after the troony episode.
Steven Universe had scenes and episodes edited/banned in various countries. The whole cartoon is probably banned somewhere.
>for the bulk of the people making the new TT show, college was the happiest time of their lives and they desperately want to go go back there and are using the show as a means to relive their glory days at Calarts.
>College
lol. Anon, the show's showrunner is Erin Gibson. She has no animation education. She did not go to Calarts. Near as I can tell she didn't even go to college. She peppers her interviews with emoticons. 🙂 You ask her about her past and she talks about podcasting and fighting the patriarchy, no talk about her educational background. She's not fantasizing about her days at Calarts. Some of her artists might be, and I can't blame them. If I was in their shoes I'd also be wishing I was back in college and not working for the most unqualified showrunner in animation.
She's from a Los Angeles suburb so it seems likely her family was wealthy enough to send her to a school even if she never actually graduated.
Oh hey she updated her web site.
http://www.eringibson.com/acting
>Erin is currently showrunning a two-season order of the WB/Amblin feminist reboot of her favorite childhood cartoon, Tiny Toons Looniversity. She has two films in production, both with strong female leads and a dramedy pilot in development at FX about caring for Boomers.
There she goes lying again. She was 11 when the cartoon debuted, and back then a girl that age would have considered herself too old to watch cartoons, moving on to Saved by the Bell and other live action kid dramas, source, I had an older sister in the 90s.
>the WB/Amblin feminist reboot
The intro explains they're at a university. Execs may have pushed against the concept so most of the episodes aren't set in class. The summer vacation special begins with them in a classroom sitting in desks.
>because, for the bulk of the people making the new TT show, college was the happiest time of their lives and they desperately want to go go back there and are using the show as a means to relive their glory days at Calarts.
Social moron armchair psychology.
There have been less qualified directors. She at least did voice acting for a few shows.
>There she goes lying again. She was 11 when the cartoon debuted, and back then a girl that age would have considered herself too old to watch cartoons, moving on to Saved by the Bell and other live action kid dramas, source, I had an older sister in the 90s.
>source, I've only known one girl my whole life
She's not even saying she watched a bunch of cartoons, just that this was her favorite. We have threads about how adult it is and talk about the references younger kids wouldn't get. Also 11 is in Saturday morning cartoon demographic age range. She could be lying, but saying it as a fact is more social moron armchair psychology.
>She's not even saying she watched a bunch of cartoons, just that this was her favorite.
I doubt she even watched it.
>We have threads about how adult it is and talk about the references younger kids wouldn't get.
I lived through it. The writers and editors snuck in some edgyreferences, but it was perceived as a show for babies. It's right there in the name "tiny"
> Also 11 is in Saturday morning cartoon demographic age range.
It stopped being socially acceptable to watch cartoons after the 3rd grade. Tweens are fixated on being mature. They'd still watch the Simpsons and Beavis and Butt-head because those were edgy programs that aired at night that old people hated, but the morning and afternoon line-up were for pre-10s unless you were a loser or someone who would grow up to work in the animation industry yourself (also a loser).
I know you doubt it, you aren't supporting that with anything.
Comparing anecdotes: I have a Disney adult sister who was watching cartoons her whole life, like anyone here. She didn't get a job in animation. I think a Californian entertainment industry writer/director/voice actress has a good chance at actually watching Tiny Toons when she was 11 and not just lying.
If she had watched it, removing the iconic "No relation" line wouldn't have even crossed her mind. Who watches a show where the two leads are romantically interested in each other in multiple episodes and keep telling everyone that their shared last name doesn't mean they're related to each other and thinks "Oh yeah, these two would work much better if they actually were related"?
A misstep so far in what we're seeing. I don't think that means she's into twincest.
She's certainly not. She never watched the show, she didn't know what their dynamic was.
Are you autistic?
Yeah, but I don't see what that has to do with anything. Even Ruegger's reaction was "Ew." That would be the reaction to most of the people familiar with the show who aren't incest coomers, which she is not.
You keep saying she didn't watch the show as if that's factual and spin further theories on her thoughts on Buster and Babs as a couple.
No one who watched the show would make Buster and Babs twins unless they had an incest fetish. She's a gay hag, not an incest-fan, ergo she never watched the show.
You don't know how people work and you come to weird conclusions you express and fact. That's autism.
You sound like the kind of person who took it at face value when Kevin Smith said he was a huge fan of He-Man. The difference between him and Gibson is that he's a geek culture guy so we had proof of him talking about He-Man from years before where he said that by the time He-Man aired when he was 13 he thought it was a dumb show for babies and had graduated from cartoons to bronze age DC and Marvel comics where all the mature and exciting stuff was happening.
I'm the type of person who doesn't spread rumors about the inner working of someone's mind and past experiences based on a trailer. It's not even a neurotypical thing, it's just a normal smart thing to do. I appreciate your thoughts though, thank you for helping me understand her better. I got to see all the projects she worked on before. She worked on a lot of Funny or Die videos. Nice to see people from there making it.
A few episodes had plots revolving school shit, but most of the time they were just doing parodies of old and then new movies and shows.
I didn't go to college, rather I went to the military. Compared to my old high school peers, I turned out alright.
>ten episodes
How many of those will have Shirley?
NONE!
Sad, but plausible. She was given less starring roles in the original series than she deserved too.
>Twisted Tales of Felix
>filename
>Plucky is there first, and in college rules you're there first you get the one you pick
>"Um auckually I was going to take the top bunk so give it"
Buster is wrong and a shit and I will be mad if they try to say he's right here
Buster, like all rabbits, is considered a bottom by everyone, so he's trying to show he can be a top by asserting his dominance over Plucky (an actual top).
>Dorming with two animals with massive corkscrews
He never stood a chance
>rabbit penis: 5cm long
>duck penis: 20-40cm long
>boar penis: 30cm long
It never began for Buster.
We didn't see if Plucky was first in the room but if he was, you're right. He gets to choose which bunk he wants first because he was there first. If Buster insists he gets to pick as well, he's just bullying Plucky.
moron
The lack of shading really stands out.
They sound too much like shitty knock-offs of Bugs and Daffy. Which makes sense contextually, but they at least had their own personalities in TTA, and I feel like that's going to be completely scrapped here in favor of making a shitty LTS imitator.
T w e e n y
T o o n s
>they're already rerunning it every day
guess CN isn't burying this after all
Ok, did make Buster bi or what?
Buster was created 8 years before the current bi pride flag. Show this to someone from his time and I don’t know how they’d react.
He'd say "Oh, so that's what I am"
i cant imagine how this train of thought even entered your mind let alone how you think anyone would particularly care
>damn... someone doesnt know about a flag before it's created...
gotcha?
Admit it though. You were got.
What if you showed him the Bustersexual flag?
reminder tiny toons was at the forefront of online furry porn and art of buster railing the duck is probably older than most people in this thread
Definitely
I figured it out why this feels weird
This is literally just the Looney Toonified "Dumbing of Age"
DAMN YOU WILLIS
You know when you assemble the main cast like this it's not really that diverse. There's a lot of blonde white people.
Shut up
I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES I HATE THIN LINES
Full two min clip is up on CN's YouTube
Plucky is already the best character
Some things never change
He always has been
Not that bad. I can tell Snipple animated this because they keep doing the dry brush thing. Eric Bauza is definitely struggling with the voice direction because Buster's voice just keeps changing.
That make sense because there’s been a lot of executive meddling with Buster’s voice specifically
At least 4 actors were hired before and Bauza was asked to do it really late in the development since he was doing Daffy already
I unironically want to see the book he said he would make about this show. You can easily tell production was absolute hell because they took 3 years to make 10 episodes and barely had any content to show at conventions.
I’m surprised they managed to get anything out at all, and that it looks acceptable
Which might also explain why there’s only 10 episodes for “season 1” instead of the expected 13 - they couldn’t finish them all in time
OK, so this confirms that is basically just CN's "Dumbing of Age" and Willis is definitely a writer on the show.
I don’t think Walky and Sal were upset about being split up in university.
Good for him for breaking into the industry other than just doing webcomics and marginally official Transformers stuff, I guess
Hamton reminds me of butters
Looking at that frame is unpleasent.
It made sense until Buster dropped logs with flags on them. Why logs? So Plucky could build a fort?
>zoomers that just want to make the next big lore show are forced to do something cartoony
>it looks terrible
who could have seen this coming
Zoomers?
Zoomers are in their late 20's now
>next big lore show
What? Is there gonna be lore here?
Having some continuation elements as episodes progress = "lore" to people apperently
>zoomers that just want to make the next big lore show
do you also consider LTS to be a lore cartoon too?
jesus this board is getting more moronic each day
>Hampton is just Butters
Oh Jeeeez fellers.
Dislikes?
102 as of this post
That's a huge room for a college dorm.
Sometimes those hall type dorms are bigger, if the stopped the dorm where the opening is it would be a normal size
Because beyond there is a huge amount of wasted space with a dinky ass lamp and only one desk
This is proof we have lost. There is too much of a time disconnect between fans of the original show and this new reboot. Older fans grew up and don't care. There should be massive dislikes on this, but the downvotes are way behind. Its over. Zoomers and alpahs won.
Calm down anon
What homosexual wouldn't take the chance to take the best on the far side away from everyone?
>my sister and I...
Also getting around to watching it they sound garbage. No energy, in reading or in action, they're just bored. The frick are these clowns even being paid for if the animation is dull and the actors can't even put some oomph into the presentation?
>The frick are these clowns even being paid for if the animation is dull and the actors can't even put some oomph into the presentation?
If they were clowns. They would be funny.
Plucky's voice is impressive given Joe's passing, but Buster's voice makes me die.
>Singing how sad you are you aren't dorming with your sister
Buster is the gayest gay ever
Seems like sibling co-dependency to me.
Incestchads be winning fr
gay hag-codependency. Plucky is his frenemy (frickbuddy) Max is his nemesis (would-be boyfriend who he dresses up to seduce)
>frickbuddy
>would-be boyfriend who he dresses up to seduce
Are you okay anon
I watched the leaked episode. The subtext was laid on thick, as thick as Buster's make-up in his drag queen disguise.
So did the vocal director just tell the actors "Whatever you do, don't sound like cartoon characters"? These are the flattest, most uninteresting voices I've ever heard come out of animated characters.
is it just me or do their voices sound.....off?
Wait wait, do these two not know each other?????????
what...
>Wait wait, do these two not know each other?????????
This is a reboot. You know what that word means, right?
Babs and Buster are siblings now. It's a whole new continuity. I guess you could say:
>"Hi, I'm Tiny Toon Adventures!"
>"And I'm Tiny Toons Looniversity!"
>"No relation."
>The face Plucky makes when he screams "EN GARDE!" is the same face he makes when he screams "FRENEMY!" in the opening theme
Oh... Oh, no. He's going to be making that face throughout the series, isn't he? They think that face is the peak of comedy, don't they? It's going to be a recurring thing where Plucky gets angry and screams something while making that face, and that'll be Plucky's "bit," isn't it?
TMS animators are turning in their graves.
Plucky is cool. Buster is a lame ass.
WTF these homies get free computers AND tv in their dorm by going to Looniversity
>Buster's voice sounds completely off
You know guys, Charlie Adler IS still alive. Maybe.. get him?
Thanks to age his voice will also sound off. Mel Blanc's Bugs in the 70s and beyond was noticeably different from Bugs in the golden age.
>I was singing because I was going to through something difficult
>You see my sister and I-
>Ohhhhhh so nothing important.
Ok. One chuckle out of me.
>all those frames overly animated but no weight, no momentum, no timing.
also they already knew each other before, this is a sequel, right?
homie it's a reboot
heh
there's something distinctly weak about modern Looney Tunes shit. it's like, they're trying to be respectful to the originals, and they've studied some of the specific movements and vocals. but the thing is that the originals weren't made with a formula; they were made by trying have the maximum amount of fun out of something. Mel Blanc would take an impression of a classic (then-contemporary) holywood actor. He'd assume that the impression would be recognized no matter what, so he'd torture and just make it cartoony as frick and the humor is derived from the fact that it was both an awful impression but also a fantastic one at the same time. and similarly, Chuck Jones would just torture physical animations to the point where it was humorous not only that it looked not at all like real movement, but at the same time it kind of did. but all modern writers and VAs got out of it was "ok, be whacky and over-the-top." and it's so devoid of both life and fun
Its horrible. Busters voice is such shit. The animation is shit. It's shit!
Everything in this is so shit
>Buster is talking with his back to the audience, so you can't really see his emotions and his body language is awkward and stiff
>the lip synching is terrible in general, especially when buster sings "Why am I"
>at 0.31 buster stops talking and his mouth is closed yet in the next shot it's open like he was about to say something
>flags suddenly turn stiff when they're planted
>the facial expressions are so awkward and lifeless, even when they exaggerate. The one buster does at 1:33 in particular is terrible so he doesn't squash or stretch enough
It's embarrassing
Did you really have any hope it would be good after Animanics sucked?
Peak autism
It’s not really, it’s stuff you notice on your first watch
Peak truth. It stinks!
I expected it to be bad, but this? I mean, its really bad. It is almost unwatchable. It's missing everything that made the original good. Take away TMS out of that equation and at least you still have good voice acting and funny jokes!
Fricking hell, Bluey is animated better than this shit. A small studio down under completely mogs this WB production. Steven Speliberg should be ashamed having his name attached to this.
>That ugly ass floaty Looney Tunes Cartoons anination
Why are they all acting like theyre meeting for the first time?
Because they are. Because it's a reboot. Because that's what we all wanted, right? Out of all the missteps the new Animaniacs made, continuing directly off the old show wasn't one of them.
who the frick doesn't want the bottom bunk?
>don't have to climb up and down to get out of bed
>especially in the middle of the night, you don't disturb the other person by shifting around on the bottom
>don't have to worry about shit from your bed falling off the side onto the other person
It's legitimately fricking awful having the top bunk and I'm convinced writers who put in the "No I WANT THE TOP BUNK!" arguments in their shows have never actually been near a fricking bunk bed
>your roommate pisses the bed, causing it to rain down on you
>things that never happen unless
>be top bunk chad
>bathroom too far
>climb halfway down ladder
>piss in roommates pants
>start bedwetter rumor
:^)
HERE YA GO PRESENT FOR YA
I love it, thank you.
I am in moron love with loon god I miss her already
Do you take reqs?
Also gallery? Nice lines, on model too.
I’ve been watchin the episodes animated only by TMS cause that’s the style everyone likes, myself included. For now, no, I ain’t takin requests.
>animated only by TMS cause that’s the style everyone likes, myself included.
Startoons did some good eps as well.
>For now, no, I ain’t takin requests.
Aight, thanks anyway. Did you draw that group shot posted before of all their stereotypes? If I missed anymore of your TTA art please post.
Make sure to draw the older show designs, they are slightly better.
It’s her word, she has the right to use it.
>Ultrahand
You've already drawn her fat, haven't you?
Wrong-o. But I did doodle this.
Would Shirley actually eat a bug burger or with the advent of fake meat would she chow down?
She wouldn’t even eat bugs. They’re her little friends.
>friend? or at best acquaintance and schoolmate clearly distressed and angry by what he's doing
>continues to do it
What a prick, Gurdy.
At least Shirley returned the favor by inflicting a fetish on him.
>troony troons
>Buster just wanted to sleep with his sister
;_;
I need him to milk my wiener dry
Cringe
What happens when there’s no lgbt characters and everyone moral panicked for nothing like Animaniacs?
Dizzy was a they/them in the leaked episode.
Random pronoun shit isn’t really LGBT and we know they already had to censor the rainbow in the drag show so they might have to censor that too
>Random pronoun shit isn’t really LGBT
Why do you frickers just BLATANTLY lie like this? Like what the hell, what do you frickers gain for doing so?
It’s not specifically lesbian, gay, bi or trans
It’s just being an attention prostitute weirdo that gets a plus
Cinemaphile being moronic and b***hing over nothing? What a novel concept.
That doesn't mean:
>the reboot still was necessary
>the some of changes made in the reboot already were necessary
>that the reboot will be good
LGBT is worse case scenario, but that was never solely what was wrong with this reboot and you are being massively disingenuous if you think that's what people's only problem would be
he's right though. People CONSUME more then ever, dragging down the quality of all entertainment
The one thing I like about this Gibson showrunner is she isn’t on twitter so we don’t have to hear her crying or saying stupid shit like every creator does now
Buster looks better without gloves fight me
I just want Smeet and Kiff Kaff to draw more Babs, Rubella, and Fifi. Maybe even that lil cioyte dude too.
Fifi was already on my list since I love her design, hehe, though I'm not super familiar with Tiny Toons — I can't guarantee I'll draw her soon, but I do want to!
I would totally frick her up the ass
Which TTL characters wouldn’t you guys frick?
Elmyra, Barky Marky and Concord
>Concord
You underestimate my degeneracy. I’d have swapped him out for the shitty Italian fleas.
>I just want Smeet and Kiff Kaff to draw more Babs, Rubella, and Fifi.
Hmmmmm
Old designs are better.
I don’t hate it. Didn’t realize they were all going to meet for the first time in this series. So what exactly is the point of making Buster and Babs siblings? I always like their rivalry/flirting. It was cozy.
They could have made an original show with new characters and this entire premise with college toons going to school. But no, they tack some old IP on it because exces think it will instantly be good with young and old fans alike, little do they know fricking with the formula of the original show so badly will result in disaster.
So that either or both of them can be gay. This is very important to brainrotted modern writers.
Hamton is cute!
99% of the hate is because they made them twins for literally no reason
Why did these dumbasses make Buster and Babs siblings
>all their fight are deliberately wrote to sound sexual and like a gay couple
>millennial/zoomer humor
It does make my boner feel funny
i hate the lack of gloves and his really big thick ears
Sorry ChrisChan.
i love the lack of gloves and his really big thick ears
i know there is this weird artistic trend of avoiding using black for lineart but black is a surefire choice to help blend with other colors
Yeah, I just noticed how the bed just blends in with the floor aside from the ladder. It makes the composition look amateurish, especially when all of the other lineart is black.
And someone wanted this thing so here.
Very nice cartoony work there.
your link's broken, m8
Aside from the big ass, damn you really can get these characters on model
OC is coming in great bros
>It's all about practice, gotta take the time to learn how these characters work
I've seen alot of fanart of this franchise, stuff like yours I like the most because it retains its toonyness and you draw them very close to their original designs.
>I wasn't a prodigy. I never rubbed no elbows with nobody famous. I'm 31 years old, and sure, I wish I was a better artist than I am now for as long as I've been doin it.
May I ask, how long have you been drawing?
From where I stand, I would love to to able to do what you do, for what its worth, I think you are very good.
Someone mentioned Ultrahand earlier, is that your alias? Where can I find more of your art?
>It's the kinda thing that motivates me to keep goin, people who wanna draw shouldn't give up just cause they hit a certain number.
I think its very hard to start late, especially in this modern age where young kids have access to digital means to early, you got some teens that pick up drawing so fast, plus now you have the entire internet packed with helpful tutorials. It's no wonder you got people who are like pros by the time they are 20 or 25. That can be intimating if you are over 30 or 40 and are trying to start, because these young ones have all this early experience. And being that older age you know everything you draw early on will be shit, vs those younger years where kids draw for the love of drawing and don't realize they kinda suck.
Why are sfw images being removed? I'm trying to have a conversation here!
That's a nice pic.
It would be a real shame if somebody made a gay edit of it.
https://files.catbox.moe/132h41.jpg
What's your social? I like your stuff.
Ask the original artist in 3 days.
I mean you gay edits though I want to see more
There are no dedicated "gay edits". I simply come, make a funny edit, and leave.
And there it is, frickin fairy homosexual mods remove my shit and they let porn stay up in other threads.
The top bunk is hotter. Bottom bunk is superior.
That depends on how high the ceiling is.
And it's an advantage in winter.
Wait, what got deleted? It doesn't sound like it was porn and thus I am confused.
I still find it funny that this debuts in less then a week and still doesn’t have a wiki page
No one cares.
I wish this wasn't a reboot where they change the dynamics of things, like Buster and Babs as brother and sister.
In another timeline I was picturing some meta humor of it being 30 years later and they still look the same but are now in college. I wanted some jokes to reference the old show. This shit features characters who are shells of their former selfs.
Any kid watching this now is gonna consider this canon and likely consider the old show weird, especially because it relied a bunch on pop culture humor which while great at the time dated the show before we turned over to the year 2000.
I remember years ago thinking how happy I would be if TTA and Animanics ever came back. Then we started the roller coaster ride of reboots that started I guess around 2016/2017, and pretty much every single one from every studio sucked. Now the word "reboot" fills me with dread every time I hear it. I'm in my 30s I should be so thrilled that these cartoons of my childhood are back, and yet I am anything but thrilled. I never even watched the Nu-maniacs reboot because of all the bad press it got. It usually always the same shit: bad writing, bad jokes, bad dialogue, subpar voice acting, crappy sound/scores, terrible animation and character designs, etc..
CONT
There is a Darkwing Duck and Talepsin reboot coming headed by Seth Rogan. I feel nothing for these, despite loving the originals. Who the frick are these reboots even made for these days? Gen Y doesn't care, Gen Z and beyond have Twitch and Youtube personalities to watch and likely give no shits about this stuff they are glued to their dumbphones. I will always say that many of the reboots came too late and needed to happen 10-15 years ago. Before all these shitty new writers and directors came in, before everything got so politically correct, before the old voice actors got too old and either sounded bad or were outright replaced with worse talent, before puppetriging animation, and before every cartoon's reputation hinged on what idiots from Twitter thought about it.
It's all so bleak and shitty these days. No hope.
About the siblings thing, I have a very specific worry. I think the writers won't be able to help themselves and will insert some lame melodrama into this thing. Babs and Buster will have a falling out, and there will be a serious and dramatic "No relation" at some point.
>no y'see they were always related they just became estranged they now say "no relation"
Risky move, let's see if it pays off.
The voices are absolutely embarrassing in this. I was never a giant Tiny Toons fan, outside of the look of the better episodes and Acme All-Stars, but couldn't they at least attempt to recapture the same vibe of the voice acting from the original?
Its a complete reboot so I guess they figured "eh frick it"
It’s only embarrassing if you’re expecting exactly the same as the original
These are fine, Plucky is especially good
They're the flattest, most uninteresting voices I've ever heard come out of Warner Bros. I'm surprised they even bothered with Plucky's lisp.
And Ruggar said the cast was awesome. Why he ass kiss?
Because he isn't an autist like you and can think they are good voices on his own
>good voices on his own
They aren't tho.
I don't get how this follows strike guidelines but apparently they are doing voicing for season 2 right now
>wears a babs shirt
based but his voice for buster still sucks.
To be fair, Charlie Adler was always irreplaceable. The second guy they got for the holiday specials was rough on the ears.
It's funny that you say that because Adler was supposed to be replaced when they recorded the first five episodes. Buster was always a hard character to cast.
That doesn't make his voice good. I'm pretty sure he could do an acceptable Buster impression, but the voice direction stinks.
I didn't say it was good, just mentioning the VA was rushed into the role so that might explain why it isn't as good as it could be
>I'm pretty sure he could do an acceptable Buster impression
Agreed but that's not what they wanted
He was a quite literal last minute replacement so
Holy shot so CN really is dead. Damn
I thought he meant CN Studios when he said that, but reading between the lines, damn...
i wish candi milo would wrap her arms around me instead
I for one am looking forward to the Fowlmouth gets cancelled episode
All the person doing Plucky's voice has to do is Daffy's voice. And whoever this person is has failed at that most basic task.
People really keep thinking they are trying to 1:1 the original even after the twins shit
And I don't get why they should, Plucky should be his own thing separate from just a small Daffy clone
They still the "same" characters, though, even if they're different versions of them. Bugs and Daffy in The Looney Tunes Show still sound like Bugs and Daffy even though they're not the same Bugs and Daffy from the original shorts.
>The Looney Tunes Show
I remember not liking it at the time but it grew on me. I don't think the same can be said for this TTA reboot.
So...who tops?
Hamton.
This
He forces both to bottom at the same time when he's done with their shit
why the frick does everything look like it has 2 frames of animation
the lack of babs upskirts is going to piss me off
You should be more pissed off at how the designs have that shit feature where the legs start skinner where they are attached to the character and get wider as they get to the feet. Should be the other way around.
Also Babs goes no pants now and has white tunny furry as canon that goes down to her neither regions.
Holy shit, why does this look so awful?
Current-year cartoon that had multiple production issues
The show's Latin American debut has been delayed, which LA's CN is infamous for being very heavily censored
It's unknown if they are not done with dubbing or if there's mature content or gay shit they want to censor, it's likely the later