Reminder that Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk could literally end world hunger and ensure every human being was fed, clothed, and housed, (or the governments of the world could do so by adequately taxing them) but they deliberately choose not to because they have no loyalty to their fellow man and would rather see a mass extinction event than even entertain the abolition of capitalism
Fricking this, so much this. Why cant everyone on earth just be nice? How about feeling good is the new currency? Being a good fricking person should be what makes you wealthy. Then I'd be Jeff and Jeff would be in his mommy's basement like the little incel he is.
>Being a good fricking person should be what makes you wealthy. Then I'd be Jeff and Jeff would be in his mommy's basement like the little incel he is.
kek >implying he is a good person >when he's wasting his time on Cinemaphile instead of volunteering at an orphanage or something else
How will they do that?
Just go and throw money around, it would help for a couple of weeks, then what?
I´m not defending greedy people but if they can do that so can any dictator and leader of criminal cartels on third world countries
>4 billion starving nigglets and pajeets >spend billions if not trillions to make sure theyre all fed >10 years later >20 billion starving nigglets and pajeets >repeat
This is why africa and india are 60% of the world population
>colonial power comes in, steals resources, makes the indigenous people a slave caste >woooow why aren't they as successful as the colonial powers that took all their capital?
This, you can't advance people before they're ready, if they'll ever be, the prime directive had a point.
Look at the N. Sentinelese. They've been on that island for 40,000 years allegedly, with little to no interference and no colonialism, and we still don't know if they're invented fire.
No, in Endgame when he learns his original plan wouldn't work, he changes to an even worse plan.
They end up being fortunate that "Destroy the Entire Universe and Start Over" wasn't his intent when he snapped the first time
He wouldn't have listened
He's too attached to the idea because this is what he proposed to do to save his race, but they turned it down and died out as a result, the feeling of vindication is too great to see reason
"Not listening" is not a case of "literally not hearing you". He has no intent of changing his mind because it's really all about him and feeling vindicated.
No, in Endgame when he learns his original plan wouldn't work, he changes to an even worse plan.
They end up being fortunate that "Destroy the Entire Universe and Start Over" wasn't his intent when he snapped the first time
then they can try to convince him to try it out on one planet before killing everyone
He thought the lesson of halving would teach the remaining half to keep their populations under control and avoid overpopulation. More importantly they should be grateful to him for his sacrifices in accomplishing it.
I think if you put him in an empty void where he can do nothing to entertain himself he would eventually come to this conclusion, I think dr strange could've done something like this
He was a traumatised, self-righteous narcissist with extreme delusions of grandeur and OCD. What he really needed was strong meds and a warm straight-jacket in a loony bin
It's not moronic though, halving the population absolutely reduces resource consumption.
All c**ts have to do to stop it from reaching the same levels again is keep their legs closed.
This like, how is this guy an imposing villain other than him being strong? He’s like this philosopher and shit but he’s a drooling idiot? This is a great example of a character intended to be smart written by morons
If he wanted to wipe out half of all life fine but the reasoning is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Literally a million ways to circumvent that without wiping out all life, why are you starting from the top of the pyramid to fix the whole thing? Fix the foundation first. Frick it dude.
Reminder that Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk could literally end world hunger and ensure every human being was fed, clothed, and housed, (or the governments of the world could do so by adequately taxing them) but they deliberately choose not to because they have no loyalty to their fellow man and would rather see a mass extinction event than even entertain the abolition of capitalism
That's Thanos
>Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk could literally end world hunger and ensure every human being was fed,
how are they going to do that, exactly?
By killing all the hungry people.
oh, yeah, fair enough.
>no answer
holy shit I'm shocked. look at how shocked I am.
Fricking this, so much this. Why cant everyone on earth just be nice? How about feeling good is the new currency? Being a good fricking person should be what makes you wealthy. Then I'd be Jeff and Jeff would be in his mommy's basement like the little incel he is.
>Being a good fricking person should be what makes you wealthy. Then I'd be Jeff and Jeff would be in his mommy's basement like the little incel he is.
kek
>implying he is a good person
>when he's wasting his time on Cinemaphile instead of volunteering at an orphanage or something else
How will they do that?
Just go and throw money around, it would help for a couple of weeks, then what?
I´m not defending greedy people but if they can do that so can any dictator and leader of criminal cartels on third world countries
Just throw billions at subhuman shitskins theyll definitely build a functioning society
>4 billion starving nigglets and pajeets
>spend billions if not trillions to make sure theyre all fed
>10 years later
>20 billion starving nigglets and pajeets
>repeat
This is why africa and india are 60% of the world population
>colonial power comes in, steals resources, makes the indigenous people a slave caste
>woooow why aren't they as successful as the colonial powers that took all their capital?
>Entire continent of Europe bombed to oblivion with 40 million dead during WWII
>Bounce back in a decade
>What is the Marshall plan
Colonies also received financial aid. Nineteenth century colonialism was in large part inspired by humanitarianism.
>colonial power comes in
>finds pre bronze age tech levels
>advances tribes about 3000 years in 200 years
>results in 21st Century 3rd world
This, you can't advance people before they're ready, if they'll ever be, the prime directive had a point.
Look at the N. Sentinelese. They've been on that island for 40,000 years allegedly, with little to no interference and no colonialism, and we still don't know if they're invented fire.
Not all peoples were meant to 'advance'.
Elon Musk could give every human on Earth $100k and still have $165B left. It's true.
Dumb monkey, Haiti for example has had the most support in terms of aid and funds than any other country in the world and its still a shithole
No, in Endgame when he learns his original plan wouldn't work, he changes to an even worse plan.
They end up being fortunate that "Destroy the Entire Universe and Start Over" wasn't his intent when he snapped the first time
He wouldn't have listened
He's too attached to the idea because this is what he proposed to do to save his race, but they turned it down and died out as a result, the feeling of vindication is too great to see reason
Yes I bet the psychopathic egomaniacal cosmic warlord will listen calmly.
and that's what no one did
one guy can shout at him while all others are fighting him, doesn't have to someone important, just a loud guy
"Not listening" is not a case of "literally not hearing you". He has no intent of changing his mind because it's really all about him and feeling vindicated.
why didn't they banish Thanos to the dark dimension
He learns it will not work in Endgame, and switches to wiping out the entire universe and starting over.
then they can try to convince him to try it out on one planet before killing everyone
>kill half of all life
>universe repopulates in a few years
>repeat
>universe repopulates in a few years (again)
this was his plan?
He thought the lesson of halving would teach the remaining half to keep their populations under control and avoid overpopulation. More importantly they should be grateful to him for his sacrifices in accomplishing it.
Wouldn't have necessarily worked. morons don't change their ways even when presented with evidence.
>surely this insane supervillain will just listen to my logical explanation and see the error of his ways
I think if you put him in an empty void where he can do nothing to entertain himself he would eventually come to this conclusion, I think dr strange could've done something like this
nevermind that wouldn't work, he would jerk off in the void, that what I would do
He was a traumatised, self-righteous narcissist with extreme delusions of grandeur and OCD. What he really needed was strong meds and a warm straight-jacket in a loony bin
maybe a good solid whack in the head with a golf club too
So traumatized he didn't realize he could curbstomp the whole cast even without the Stones.
It's not moronic though, halving the population absolutely reduces resource consumption.
All c**ts have to do to stop it from reaching the same levels again is keep their legs closed.
So why not kill them all instead and now there's no point?
>and now there's no point?
You just said it.
This like, how is this guy an imposing villain other than him being strong? He’s like this philosopher and shit but he’s a drooling idiot? This is a great example of a character intended to be smart written by morons
If he wanted to wipe out half of all life fine but the reasoning is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard. Literally a million ways to circumvent that without wiping out all life, why are you starting from the top of the pyramid to fix the whole thing? Fix the foundation first. Frick it dude.
I'm actually doing this for the Dussy.
-Thanos
I like how the comic version of the story does not have this problem.
All they had to do was accuse him of being a pedophile according to conservatives.