What if I told you that QANON was the actual fake boogieman? That it doesn't need any attention at all in the MSM, which uses it to paint people with valid criticisms of things like corporatism as just as crazy as that relatively insignificant fringe.
He's correct but Alex Jones himself is another boogyman. Associating an idea with him undermines the idea--even if it's correct and defensible. Get it now?
Though, my theory is that alot of actors and media figures really want those coveted woke points, so they make these silly claims to get social media on their side to help reinvigorate their popularity.
>That can’t be said with books, music
Everyone in mainstream writing is either lib propaganda books or non gender YA fantasy shit.
Everyone in mainstream music is a glorification of sex, violence, drugs, and blacks.
Acting is just a fancy term for lying. Actors are professional liars, probably the last group of people on earth you should trust yet people can’t stop listening to them.
Money and fame changes you. If you're rich and famous for long enough, you barely even qualify as human. Your ego is in a constant state of stimulation and swelling. Eventually, all you're able to acknowledge of reality is your own gravitational existence.
Dude's a pedo killer and talks about "straight white male problems"
This is all such bullshit and if you can't see that there is clearly an anti white, anti male narrative happening then you're a fricking moron or you are deep in denial. It's always the horrible people with the privilege and horrible behavior that talk about how bad whites are and how bad males are. My older brother is like this now and he's a huge fricking selfish butthole who is very well off and has always been successful in life. What the frick is wrong with these people. Can't they just be fricking happy that their lives are already so much better than everyone elses? why do they have to project all this guilt in the form of preaching to other people about how bad they are?
If you have any problems with whites or males then I immediately think you're a narcissistic piece of shit who doesn't actually care about anyone
snake shit i dunno. "Comedians" like Sarah Silvermen says shit like that. "I used to say naughty things but I don't and also you shouldn't." it is like pulling the ladder up when you're at the top.
They are all psychopaths
ok I get it. Don't want people putting on black face or to act gay unless it's authentic
but where's the line? can only blind actors okay blind characters? can someone with good eyesight play someone who wears glasses? can Tom Hanks play a bisexual character? can a half black person play someone who's fully black?
>but where's the line?
The line is nebulous and subject to change at any time. That's how leftist virtue works. It's always shifting further left. What's acceptable today won't be allowed tomorrow.
>peter dinklage plays a dwarf and makes it big (lel) >starts preaching that other dwarfs shouldn't play midgets, elves, and other short characters >tom hanks plays a gay guy earlier in his career >decades later when he's rich, tells people that straight people shouldn't play gay people
Is there a name for this?
snake shit i dunno. "Comedians" like Sarah Silvermen says shit like that. "I used to say naughty things but I don't and also you shouldn't." it is like pulling the ladder up when you're at the top.
They are all psychopaths
>I did something but no one should ever be allowed to do it again
what is this vile “I got mine” attitude called?
Sometimes, even if the phrase sounds ridiculous, it has a valid meaning. Like, "virtue signaling" and "woke capitalism". I hate using those words when I don't have to, but sometimes, it's easier to say it then write out the definition.
>peter dinklage plays a dwarf and makes it big (lel) >starts preaching that other dwarfs shouldn't play midgets, elves, and other short characters >tom hanks plays a gay guy earlier in his career >decades later when he's rich, tells people that straight people shouldn't play gay people
Is there a name for this?
It's just called being a hypocrite. they are now in a timeline where it's encouraged to separate people into groups, a literal regression from the progress we made to be more tolerant. They are choosing to pander, and give up values in exchange for twitter likes.
There was no reason for dinklage to make this comment, but it sounds great on twitter, for example.
*kicks ladder*
Dinklage did it better
le epstein face
I love how nobody ever questions the fact that this dude has greek citizenship
why would a holllywood actor need a fricking greek citizenship?
Does he even know any greek?
Probably, his wife is Greek descent and he visits Greece so much that he considers it a second home. I still think he's a pedophile, though.
>but pedophilia has nothing to do with it
My first thought was tax haven or something until the knee jerk defense about shagging kids. Dropped the ball, article writer.
Isn't his wife greek?
>no one ever questions it
Enough people questioned it to warrant that headline kek, stupid poltard delusions
>Enough people questioned it to warrant that headline
Source?
What if I told you that QANON was the actual fake boogieman? That it doesn't need any attention at all in the MSM, which uses it to paint people with valid criticisms of things like corporatism as just as crazy as that relatively insignificant fringe.
alex jones already does that though
He's correct but Alex Jones himself is another boogyman. Associating an idea with him undermines the idea--even if it's correct and defensible. Get it now?
That is some backward ass logic you are applying there buckeroo
Because he enjoys visiting Greece?
How do you connect Greek citizenship to being a pedo?
and nor did he
P
E
D
O
Was he never acting then? Was he actually a moron in Forest Gump?
This.
Though, my theory is that alot of actors and media figures really want those coveted woke points, so they make these silly claims to get social media on their side to help reinvigorate their popularity.
either way he's enabling and supporting it so whats the difference.
>It's a GOOD thing that we're implementing arbitrary, nonsensical, histrionic "rules" on everything that didn't exist 30 years ago
>especially since I got to become famous already
Why is it that everyone connected to film is so unlikable? That can’t be said with books, music, or whatever. Literally all of them are unlikable.
>That can’t be said with books, music
Everyone in mainstream writing is either lib propaganda books or non gender YA fantasy shit.
Everyone in mainstream music is a glorification of sex, violence, drugs, and blacks.
Acting is just a fancy term for lying. Actors are professional liars, probably the last group of people on earth you should trust yet people can’t stop listening to them.
Money and fame changes you. If you're rich and famous for long enough, you barely even qualify as human. Your ego is in a constant state of stimulation and swelling. Eventually, all you're able to acknowledge of reality is your own gravitational existence.
Dude's a pedo killer and talks about "straight white male problems"
This is all such bullshit and if you can't see that there is clearly an anti white, anti male narrative happening then you're a fricking moron or you are deep in denial. It's always the horrible people with the privilege and horrible behavior that talk about how bad whites are and how bad males are. My older brother is like this now and he's a huge fricking selfish butthole who is very well off and has always been successful in life. What the frick is wrong with these people. Can't they just be fricking happy that their lives are already so much better than everyone elses? why do they have to project all this guilt in the form of preaching to other people about how bad they are?
If you have any problems with whites or males then I immediately think you're a narcissistic piece of shit who doesn't actually care about anyone
>could a straight man get AIDS?
No. Based hanks
did he just come out?
He came out as a pedo a while ago tho
>could a straight man get AIDS like I did in Philadelphia? No, and rightly so.
Someone should just ask these buttholes the definition of ACTING and then slap the shit out of them.
Tom hanks looks like he should be a black guy now
how could someone so cringe have such a based son like chet
he didn’t raise him
Children are often the opposite of their parents
but why are gays and Biscum allowed to play straight people? Is this more wokie double standards?
>rightly so
So actors can't even act anymore? They have to actually be what they're portraying? Does this mean gays can't play straight characters?
He's practically saying straight people cannot empathize with gays.
Can't wait until that fricking pedo kicks the bucket
does he mean that he's a homosexual? doesn't he have a family? what the hell is this?
>all the things from you the past you loved were bad, goy
>Only gay actors should play gay roles
>Only handicapped people should play handicapped roles
>Only psychopaths should play psychopaths
When does this line of thought end? Should
Eddie Redmayne give back his Oscar for playing Stephen Hawking?
>When does this line of thought end?
Literally ONLY when it starts to inconvenience the people who push it.
>I did something but no one should ever be allowed to do it again
what is this vile “I got mine” attitude called?
snake shit i dunno. "Comedians" like Sarah Silvermen says shit like that. "I used to say naughty things but I don't and also you shouldn't." it is like pulling the ladder up when you're at the top.
They are all psychopaths
>that webm
jesus christ lol what a cringe circlejerk
Inspiring, a whole auditorium of sexual abuse victims and the perpetrators came together to believe women
ok I get it. Don't want people putting on black face or to act gay unless it's authentic
but where's the line? can only blind actors okay blind characters? can someone with good eyesight play someone who wears glasses? can Tom Hanks play a bisexual character? can a half black person play someone who's fully black?
>but where's the line?
The line is nebulous and subject to change at any time. That's how leftist virtue works. It's always shifting further left. What's acceptable today won't be allowed tomorrow.
>peter dinklage plays a dwarf and makes it big (lel)
>starts preaching that other dwarfs shouldn't play midgets, elves, and other short characters
>tom hanks plays a gay guy earlier in his career
>decades later when he's rich, tells people that straight people shouldn't play gay people
Is there a name for this?
Ya we need a name for it
It's called kicking the ladder, or gatekeeping.
unironically, the word is "privilege"
they're privileged actors compared to no names trying to make a name for themselves who will take any part they can get
Yes, but that's not a name for it. Ladder pulling is probably the way to go.
Nah sounds like something a troony would come up with.
Sometimes, even if the phrase sounds ridiculous, it has a valid meaning. Like, "virtue signaling" and "woke capitalism". I hate using those words when I don't have to, but sometimes, it's easier to say it then write out the definition.
It's just called being a hypocrite. they are now in a timeline where it's encouraged to separate people into groups, a literal regression from the progress we made to be more tolerant. They are choosing to pander, and give up values in exchange for twitter likes.
There was no reason for dinklage to make this comment, but it sounds great on twitter, for example.
The phrase is ladder pulling, the usual context is when people lobby to ban shit they've already gotten rich from doing
>seethes at getting called pedo multiple times by Blicky Gayvase
Why stop at only hiring a gay guy to play a homosexual with AIDS.
Need to make sure you get a POZZED actor too.
why stop there? Full penetration of the aids gays on screen bug catching
I'm so sick of all these people. I wish the whole industry would collapse
Is he giving his Oscar and money back?
Who is to say I can't identify as a gay man for the duration of shooting?
For me, it's Phil Lamarr dramatically changing his mind over who's allowed to be a voice actor in just one year
he's saying straight men can't get AIDS anymore? Well, he's partly right, but there's still a very small chance of it happening.
I agree. If anyone plays a homosexual with AIDS from now on, they should be a homosexual and get AIDS. It's gotta be authentic.
Luckily that's most of Hollywood at this point.
People keep playing homosexuals because it's Oscar bait.
Tom Hanks is gay?
I thought Tom Hanks was well liked?
This guy is a pedophile and you cannot convince me otherwise
isn't the whole point of acting pretending to be somebody you aren't?
People tend to portray themselves as the opposite of what they are, like Ellen Degeneris.
Finally, people are cumming to the realization that tom hanks is a phony.