>Turns Star Wars from a safe money printer to a risky endeavor that will probably lose money

>Turns Star Wars from a safe money printer to a risky endeavor that will probably lose money
>Makes Willow reboot that’s so bad it’s pulled off Disney+ in less than a year
>Produces Indiana Jones film that’s on track to be one of the biggest flops in Hollywood history
>Still has a job at Lucasfilm
How does she do it?

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    What is a woman?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A warm, moist slipcover for your dick.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A miserable pile of she-crets

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        nicely done

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      And you’ve won the daily double, where would you like to go next anon?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A pizza hut in the garage?

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Disney needs to fail!

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The sequel series made back the whole investment in the franchise. 4 billion dollarydoos. That's pretty successful, tbph.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it did not!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      moron

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      The Sequel Trilogy made the least amount of money of the 3 trilogies, dummy. And it’s initial box office was based on the return of Han/ Luke/ Leia, not on the fact that one of the 11 different middle aged white producers being Kathleen Kennedy.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      If it did make the money back, it's still a failure.

      You make 4 billion dollar IP purchases to legally print money with the built-in fanbase. Making, say, 4.3 billion on return of the purchase is not a success. You're out 4bn and made a profit equivalent to the budget of a Marvel movie.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        But you guys are forgetting that each film in the ST cost between $200-$300 million (with Rise of Skywalker costing over $400+ million). And each had a marketing budget of $200-$300 million. That puts another say $1.6 billion in costs on top of the $4+ billion, meaning all told they spent close to $6 billion and probably only cleared $1-$2 billion in net profit after splits with theatres. So they were still down $5 billion after the ST.

        They used to make that up with merchandising revenue. But Last Jedi destroyed Star Wars are merchandising juggernaut. No, Star Wars is reduced to one or two hangers at Target and the only toys that sell are retro Empire Strikes Back or ROTJ toys.

        The Sequel Trilogy killed Star Wars dead, and it’s time that Bob Iger faced that and stopped throwing good money after bad

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          The force Awakens Merchandise bankrupted toys r us!
          Actual star wars fans hated the crap awakens! They buy merchandise! Not normies!

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          yeah movie toys don't sell anymore because no one likes the orcs characters or stronk females

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          With the advances we have in graphics technology, you could make a Star Wars sequel with all of the OG characters with their original looks along with AI voice acting for Carrie Fisher.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      A New Hope made over $4 billion at the box office.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Now tell us how much making and marketing the sequel trilogy cost. Hell, throw in the cost of that failed starcruiser hotel thing, too.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >starcruiser hotel thing

        you didn't go?!?! where are all the shills calling you poor gay for not wanting to buy overpriced crap

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's not a matter of just making money on it, though. It's a matter of opportunity cost. Not only did they royally frick up Star Wars in itself, but all the money they spent on those movies and shows could have been put toward better ends.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      4blns to buy, 1+bln to produce and market
      ~4.5blns box office
      It's at very best went to zero anon.
      Losses from merch and other related activities like building the fricking flop hotel brought the negative numbers.
      Disney hurt themselves with how they handled SW franchise.
      Only when Disney go bankrupt people will realize how great Lucas was in every aspect of business, filmmaking and art.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I find it very hard to believe they're losing money on Star Wars merch.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          They absolutely are. The only stuff that sells is retro OT stuff, and even that isn’t selling like it should. OT fans are holding back on spending money on merch because they hate Kennedy

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I'd say OT fans hate Disney as a whole, not only Kennedy

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Dollar and thrift stores have bigger Star Wars sections than normal stores now.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      How much cum did you chug before you made that post?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Disney isnt in green with starwars yet. They made 4 billion. But they have spend shitload of money too. Like that hotel that closed down.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Disney isnt in green with starwars yet.
        They'll never be in the black with the purchase now. They have destroyed the studio before ever making a profit and now there's no future for it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It depends how they spin disney+ money.
          It allows them to claim they are profitable with Lucasfilm. That that won't be nothing more then PR to save the face

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Galaxy's Edge alone cost Disney another 1 billion dollars to produce.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >That's pretty successful
      Not really. If you make a massive investment and it only breaks even, it was a failure. The purpose is to make money.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They actually didn’t make much in profit. They supposedly only made $500 mil on TFA, and since the other two movies were just as expensive, they likely barely cleared $1 b in profit from the new trilogy

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        do you think the big hipped orc was to blame? or that uggo orc rose? or that cum dumpster stronk wyman meme

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Sloppy writing by Abrams and co, primarily

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8
      put me in the screencap plox

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >wokie doesn’t understand opportunity cost
      Typical.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        it barely made 4 billions in revenue how is it supposed to have made 4 billions in profits unless everybody worked for free

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I dont think you understand what opportunity cost is, or maybe you’re responding to the wrong person
          >how is it supposed to have made 4 billions in profits unless everybody worked for free
          By being more successful. It was like 5 movies after all.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >>The sequel series made back the whole investment in the franchise. 4 billion dollarydoos. That's pretty successful, tbph.
            >By being more successful. It was like 5 movies after all.
            moron
            i understand what opportunity cost is but you are a moron for pointing to opportunity cost when the sequel trilogy didnt even recover the original investment much less interest, much less opportunity costs for potential investments with a higher interest rate

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Oh no, he thinks the whole box office revenues go back to the studio and also ignores the money they spent to make and advertize these movies...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Obvious bait. Why are you falling for this? Nobody can genuinely be that moronic.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I like how people disagree with this but have no proof to the contrary.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I wasn't aware that cinemas work for free and disney takes 100% of the movie revenue?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you mean just in box office, when you factor in marketing plus the theater cut, they did not make back the investment. If you add in toys and games and crap they probably did, but I doubt they spent so much money to just break even after multiple films and using all the fan capital. Also keep in mind the loss from Solo + the flop of the Star Wars theme parks etc.
        They didn’t lose money, but no way they bought it thinking they’d only make this much.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I like how people agree with this but have no proof.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      don't forget to add the LARGE asterisk that is the merchandise becoming shelf poison for retailers

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No it isn't, not compared to what it should've been. The sequels were supposed to be the golden goose that creates a new MCU. They spent 5 billion to get the rights, they definitely spent over an additional billion making the trilogy and on merch sales and advertisement. Each movie put asses in seats, that's true, but it only resulted in two more cautious spin-off films and a few low budget streaming services. The actual plan was supposed to be 20 more movies and the whole world being all about Star Wars.
      Even Disney knows the sequels are a failure. You can tell because all their post-sequels content seems to be carefully avoiding the sequel timeline and its characters, while focusing nearly all its efforts on jerking off the previous eras to earn back some goodwill.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Those other star wars projects were my favorite. Rian Johnson trilogy. GoT guys trilogy. Kevin Feige movie. Patty Jenkins movie. That's 8 movies allready. Then there was change in director. How many guys were put to make episode 9? That movie got rebooted once or twice.
        Next rey movie has been rebooted once.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          No it isn't, not compared to what it should've been. The sequels were supposed to be the golden goose that creates a new MCU. They spent 5 billion to get the rights, they definitely spent over an additional billion making the trilogy and on merch sales and advertisement. Each movie put asses in seats, that's true, but it only resulted in two more cautious spin-off films and a few low budget streaming services. The actual plan was supposed to be 20 more movies and the whole world being all about Star Wars.
          Even Disney knows the sequels are a failure. You can tell because all their post-sequels content seems to be carefully avoiding the sequel timeline and its characters, while focusing nearly all its efforts on jerking off the previous eras to earn back some goodwill.

          There was that original picture of the planned schedule that had Obi-wan as a film, and several films a year. All scaled back.

          No it isn't, not compared to what it should've been. The sequels were supposed to be the golden goose that creates a new MCU. They spent 5 billion to get the rights, they definitely spent over an additional billion making the trilogy and on merch sales and advertisement. Each movie put asses in seats, that's true, but it only resulted in two more cautious spin-off films and a few low budget streaming services. The actual plan was supposed to be 20 more movies and the whole world being all about Star Wars.
          Even Disney knows the sequels are a failure. You can tell because all their post-sequels content seems to be carefully avoiding the sequel timeline and its characters, while focusing nearly all its efforts on jerking off the previous eras to earn back some goodwill.

          >Even Disney knows the sequels are a failure. You can tell because all their post-sequels content seems to be carefully avoiding the sequel timeline and its characters, while focusing nearly all its efforts on jerking off the previous eras to earn back some goodwill.

          They legit have no idea what to do and are avoiding making any firm plans for the sequel sequel's timeline.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I forgot that obi wan movie(s)
            Thats 9 openly cancelled.
            Few years back. You could see how they were betting on high Republic to be new flagship star wars. But no idea what happened to that whole thing.
            Maybe it was tv shows that got popular or KK wanted to do more girlboss movies. Or maybe they just didn't have any ideas for high Republic

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I think Acolyte is their test run for the High Republic bullshit, depending on how it goes (poorly I bet), they'll move in that direction or some other.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The Acolyte is set at the end of the High Republic era in a world of "shadowy secrets and emerging dark side powers",[1] approximately 100 years before Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999).[2] A former Padawan reunites with her Jedi Master to investigate a series of crimes, but the forces they confront are more sinister than they ever anticipated.
                Amandla Stenberg as a former padawan[4]
                Lee Jung-jae as a Jedi Master[5]
                Manny Jacinto[6]
                Dafne Keen as a young Jedi[5]
                Jodie Turner-Smith[7][6]
                Rebecca Henderson as Vernestra Rwoh, a Jedi Knight prodigy.[8]
                Charlie Barnett as a young Jedi[5]
                Dean-Charles Chapman[3]
                Carrie-Anne Moss as a Jedi[5]
                Margarita Levieva[9]
                Joonas Suotamo as Kelnacca, a Wookiee Jedi master

                This sounds like most low energy show ever. Its made by literally who woman. Basically another try of girlboss star wars

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >I forgot that obi wan movie(s)
              >Thats 9 openly cancelled.

              Did we get this Cassian Andor series?

              Does anyone have the similar picture with I think KK announcing the schedule of releases? I think we were supposed to be knee deep into the sequel sequels by now.

              and Obi-Wan film is something people have wanted for AGES yet it just became a bland Disney plus shit. Fug.

              You know what? I think they should have made a "trilogy" of Rogue One, Obi-Wan, and another one, just showing various parts but not connected to a central plot.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Cassia show happened. Aperently people liked it. But so few cares.

                >We are now entering in era where slowly stuff will be hitting public domain. And studios will get free hand to rape them.

                Alternatively, we get something decent. Maybe Japan or another east asian animation company starts adapting these public domain stories? I genuinely think big mega-corps can't make anything good, only exploit series for shallow sequels.

                [...]
                JJ Trek was JUST a shallow amusement ride. Star Trek is about optimism, liberal philosophy, speculative fiction, and having a moral. Yes, they like, had moral lessons and showed examples. Original series really feels like theater more than anything.

                JJ trek eould have been fine if it pivoted somehwere. If it had lead to proper star trek movie or show. Just pure exploration and stuff.
                Discovery was much more harmful for star trek then JJ trek.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >The age of Resistance
                >Resistance is Republic after Republic won against Empire
                >So why the winners call themselves Resistance

                Is there only low-IQ in Lucasfilm now?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It would have been so easy to fix. Just have galaxy fragment into small pieces. Some could support le bad guys. Some would support le good guys. Some would stay neutral.
                You could still make good guys under dog . Some point they lose support of major player. Now they are fricked

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Kathy tried to pave over the OT/ PT and thought that everyone would just accept it. But they don’t, and they won’t. Bob Iger needs to face that.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yes, it's the logical way after the collapse of an empire, but Diseny hates all ambiguities.

                Which lead to one of the most dumb things in Last Jedi, when the "Resistance" find no support in the universe they rule.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Even Disney knows the sequels are a failure. You can tell because all their post-sequels content seems to be carefully avoiding the sequel timeline and its characters, while focusing nearly all its efforts on jerking off the previous eras to earn back some goodwill.
        this is the smoking gun and i have no idea how people are so oblivious to it

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          they didn't learn anything, the rey timeline still exists, luke is still a b***h, they take any chance they get to replace male characters with female ones

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >nobody mentions that 2 billion went to the cinemas
      this board is moronic

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't disney israelite cinema for what % went for them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >breaking even
      >what a success!
      Kys

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Tell me you didn't read the article without telling me you didn't read the article.

      This is what the headlines say, but guess what: movies cost money to make.

      With the investments into A) the budgets of the movies, B) the theme parks that are supposed to make money but cost a frick ton to build and C) the questionable money Disney+ series do or do not make (we don't have real numbers on these), no, they have not made their investment back.

      The movies may have made $4 billion combined, but they still cost more money on top of the initial purchase cost. Thus, Disney has not made its money back on Star Wars. Not by a long shot.

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She's been hovering around Hollywood big wigs for decades and probably has dirt on every single one of them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Spielberg treats her with open contempt so you know she is just in charge coz of connections.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes.
      That's why she hates men too - she knows first-hand how degenerate powerful men can be.
      If you were in her pplace, wouldn't you hate men too?
      Same goess for Emma Watson btw. And Ellen Page, and many other women.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        that's israelites

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          as opposed to the sophisticated non-degenerate elegan/tv/irgins that wanna lick girls' buttholes

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            your kvetching hysterically again israelitey israeliteington. take your bagels

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Comparing israelites like Weinstein to guys who like ass
            Apples to pedoisraelites.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I can sort of somewhat see her logic. And after seeing how much of a dick Harrison Ford can be (smashing the Lego Millennium Falcon, and generally just despising his Star Wars fans - the people who made him successful, etc)
        Still, not every man is a degenerate butthole, though.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >smashing the Lego Millennium Falcon

          NOT MY PRECIOUS LEGORINOS

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        she's the same as them, frick her

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        So she decided to be the same person but with a vegana, except she can't even make decent flicks like the old degenerates.
        Lol

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      who cares, what did any of them do that could possibly be considered degenerate in these awful times. they must've fricked a lot of kids or something.

  5. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >based bad b***h tearing down the israelite mans legacy
    yas KKween!

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >tearing down the israelite man's legacy

      The original movies will always exist and people have already basically forgotten the Disney sequels.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Censorship is rampant and they never want to stop.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          To what are the referring from Aliens?

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            I bet it's some schizo shit about Vasquez being non-binary or something like that

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Oh the exchange with Hudson: "have you ever been mistaken for a woman?" Jesus Christ

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >Hey Vasquez, have you ever been misgendered as a transmasc?
              >Did you just assume my gender?
              >Oh Vasquez, you're such a proud non-binary genderfluid Latinx!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                i like that she blew up into a thousand pieces

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                My fear with AI voice acting, they're gonna start editing and changing these old films so they remove all the "bigotry". Policing fictional morality is their #1 poriorty in life since they see everything as politics, and media is a reflection of political power, which upholds biases and bigotry.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                they will you can count on it. it why you need to own physical copies of the things you like.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This is what conversations will be in 2100

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >in 2100
                2035 at the latest

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You didn't get memo, chud? Its LatinE now

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Hudson (a white male) makes a racially insensitive joke concerning undocumented immigration about the Latinx character Vasquez (who is played by a israeli woman).

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Yeah, it's literally just two lines of bantz between Hudson and Vasquez. That one and the, "have you ever been mistaken for a man?", line.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Why would illegal immigration for Latinos still be a thing in the 25th century or wheneve Aliens is set?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                No, Latinos have some of the lowest birthrates on the planet. They won’t even exist in the 25th century at their current rate

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            vasquez was played by the israelite that played john connor's stepmom, but in brownface

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    fricking yorkshire terrier smiling b***h

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        [...]

        [...]

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I love how fricking is censored but not homosexual

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            why the **** would homosexual be censored?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        That little homosexual with the face and the staring.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Shes based in my book for making manchildren throw tantrums

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Blackmail and installed loyalists in key positions at Disney. She's a master politicker.

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Hey she said future is female, right? Now we know what she meant by that.

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    At first she was recommended by George. By now, with this long list of horrendous failures under her belt, she's probably filled Lucas Film and various other parts of Disney with sycophants who would never let her be fired. No matter how much money she costs Disney, they're stuck with her. And if they did replace her, her replacement would just be another version of her.

    We don't need a new head of Lucas Film. We don't need a new head of Disney. We need these companies to die.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >My revenge is almost complete
      >The agents of their destruction are in place
      >It took everything, every intellectual property
      >All of my blood, sweat, and tears sacrificed for this one moment
      >All to watch The Mouse die

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Star Wars always sucked and she killed it for good. Based and likely on purpose.

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    They'll find a way to take her out of the way. It is clear that she peter principled a long time ago and should go back to serving coffee and running errands for directors

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The biggest issue with ousting KK at this point is that the damage is irreversible.
    You can't bring in a new studio head and redo Star Wars Episode 7, 8, 9.. You can't bring Harrison Ford back to do another Indiana Jones in 5-10 years.
    The IPs at Lucasfilm were extremely time sensitive and they really only had one shot to do anything with these properties. They fricked up every single time and now it's actually completely over.

    Her having a job at this point in time has to be some sort of extortion. Because she didn't just fumble the ball she set it on fire and when the fire went out she took a shit on it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      But….you can.

      Chris Pratt (who has 2 billion dollar movies this year alone) could step right into Indiana Jones and make 3 or 4 of them over a decade easily and probably make $1+ billion box office on each one.

      The EU sold over 100 million books. Just adapt it and recast the Big 3, and make the Heir To The Empire trilogy, and then build out from there. There’s plenty of diversity in the EU anyway. Every single franchise recasts. There is no reason that Lucasfilm can’t do the same

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Chris Pratt
        I don't see it. He would be a fricking terrible choice.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pratt is way too fricking goofy to do it.

          Ok Phoebe.

          I’ve seen Pratt in serious roles and he’s done a very good job. He acts goofy on purpose in Guardians as that’s what the role is

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Ok Phoebe.
            Get better material. As far as I'm concerned Indiana Jones should have just fricking ended. Not everything needs to march into perpetuity.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Indiana Jones isn’t a Saga though. It’s a premise, just like James Bond. It doesn’t need to end so long as the movies are well-made and fun.

              But these days movies are used by the *** for a specific purpose and thus it’s better if most franchises end until Hollywood ever gets back into just making movies and not….

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Indiana Jones isn’t a Saga though.
                Most things aren't. They still end.
                >It doesn’t need to end so long as the movies are well-made and fun.
                Good luck, Kathy.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Kathy’s movies aren’t well made and they aren’t fun. They are tedious exercises

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Most things aren't. They still end.

                Oh really? Tell that to:

                Superman
                Batman
                Spider-Man
                King Kong
                Godzilla
                Frankenstein
                Dracula
                The Mummy
                James Bond
                Lara Croft
                Cinderella
                Snow White
                Sherlock Holmes
                Robin Hood
                Sleeping Beauty
                Peter Pan
                The Fantastic Four
                X-Men
                Captain America
                Wolfman
                Lord of the Rings

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Okay. Enjoy your endless slop.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                All of those will end. In fact, some of them already did, and the exhumation attempts only result in mediocre, stillborn mediocre shit.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Sherlock Holmes, or Santa Claus, or Dracula, or Cinderella will end.

                No. No they fricking won’t.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The legend of Robin Hood has survived for centuries. It sure as frick isn’t thanks to all the tv and film adaptations fricking kek.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                It’s actually because of the Kevin Costner version that people still know who Robin Hood is today

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Lord of the Rings

                FRICK LORD OF THE RINGS FRICK CAPESHIT FRICK STAR WARS FRICK MANCHILD YOU GORILLA Black person homosexual

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Lord of the ring will enter in public domain in 20 years.
                We are now entering in era where slowly stuff will be hitting public domain. And studios will get free hand to rape them.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                tolkien created the first capeshit

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous
              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >We are now entering in era where slowly stuff will be hitting public domain. And studios will get free hand to rape them.

                Alternatively, we get something decent. Maybe Japan or another east asian animation company starts adapting these public domain stories? I genuinely think big mega-corps can't make anything good, only exploit series for shallow sequels.

                JJ trek wasn't that bad. Maybe 2 movie. But other wise it was fine.
                Bigger issue was. It never pivoted to anything else. It was just there. And eventually we just got those soulless tv shows

                JJ Trek was JUST a shallow amusement ride. Star Trek is about optimism, liberal philosophy, speculative fiction, and having a moral. Yes, they like, had moral lessons and showed examples. Original series really feels like theater more than anything.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                What would be intresting if china or india went all in with western public domain. Just churn out animations of those stories.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not saying I like or dislike any of these properties. Only that they’ve been going on (in some cases) for centuries. Holy shit, you poor rural Protestant trailer park “whites” can’t read and can’t think. I’m so glad you’re struggling.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                tolkien created the first capeshit

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Pratt is way too fricking goofy to do it.

          Chris Pratt was in serious negotiations to play Indiana Jones back in 2016/2017.. He's the closest "every man" actor we've had since Harrison Ford.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Harrison Ford is not an "every man" actor. What kind of moronic shit is that?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              bruh he was literally a carpenter

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The frick does that have to do with anything? Harrison Ford does not play everyman characters. He's usually playing some variety of a rogue. He has a quiet intensity and edginess to most of his performances. Pratt doesn't have anything approaching the gravitas that Ford can bring to a role.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Roger Moore was different than Sean Connery and yet both worked. He doesn’t have to imitate Ford, just create his own thing.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                all of this is just brand fraud. young harrison ford is indy, nobody else. you can make someone else be a plucky adventurer, you don't have to call him indy and give him a fedora

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                James Bond is an awful series. There's no comparison whatsoever.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Shut the hell up, and shut your face

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >actually giving a shit about james bond
                Are you 12?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >anon can’t tell that that post is a joke, he persists onward

                You’re doing my work for me, brainlet

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                ?

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Exactly

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I'm just trying to find the joke.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Go upstairs and look directly in your Mom’s master bathroom mirror.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                You're trying too hard, anon.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                I’m not trying at all.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Carry on, then.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Doesn't matter. Chris Pratt is box office gold.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Pratt is way too fricking goofy to do it.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >Chris Pratt
          I don't see it. He would be a fricking terrible choice.

          He basically plays Raptor Trainer Indiana Jones in the Jurassic World franchise and he wasn't goofy at all and hard carried the franchise as a serious action hero.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Right. He’d be great. Pratt could carry that franchise for 20 years

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Plus the normy public loves him and he has a proven track record of being in multiple billion dollar movies and leading successful franchises. Steven Spielberg even said he wanted Pratt to take over as Indy. The best thing they could have done was send Indy and Short Round Ke Huy Quan on a final adventure together where Indy passes the mantle down to Short Round, giving him his hat and whip. Chris Pratt can show up in this movie as a cool cameo bro who helps out, maybe as Ke Huy Quan's sidekick. Then the next movies are Short Round and Chris Pratt going on Indy style adventures. Maybe that's not a perfect formula but it would make more money than Fleabag lead Indiana Jones. She is old and ugly, there is nothing appealing about her.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          he wasnt goofy in the operator kino

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        your dubs represent what I wish.. But this is reality and the only thing even remotely possible is bringing in someone new to play Indiana Jones.. Turning Indiana into some type of James Bond character for decades to come (which was the original plan for Lucas/Spielberg).

        Star Wars tho is literally dead.. And odds are everything will get doubled down on

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I agree for Star Wars but you couldn’t do it with Indy. You have to find someone who can match up with Harrison Ford and people like Chris Pratt just aren’t at that calibre. I can’t think of anyone in modern Hollywood that’s many enough to pull it off.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes, Indians jones was such a unique character.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            so he's like Rey Allthejedi

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What you’re saying should’ve been obvious to anyone back in 2014.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        chris pratt is not indiana jones. young harrison ford is and nobody else. they could cast him as an adventurer similar to indy, like they did with michael douglas. they could even set it in the same universe but
        C H R I S P R A T T I S N O T I N D Y

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          post your hook nose

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            oh a /misc/tard
            my bad

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              lmao. nice buzzwords israelitey israeliteington. hope you enjoy seeing that ugly ass nise everytime you look in the mirror

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >nice buzzwords israelitey israeliteington.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        I don't get what the European Union has to do with any of this

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Chris Pratt might've worked 10 years ago, but nah not now. But I don't trust them to recast Ford, it'll be another case of Spielberg picking up his phone and asking KK nicely to cast his mschpkh boy he fricked at a bar mitzvah or whatever. LaBeouf, Eirenreich are the result of that. Even if that doesn't happen, I fully expect them to cast some fricking twink like Tom Holland or Austin Butler which is arguably worse than Spielberg nepotism, because this would be them going full moron on their own.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >The EU sold over 100 million books. Just adapt it
        I feel like the people who say this do not understand that the people currently in charge of Star Wars simply are not the right people for this. They don't want to do this, and if they tried to do it they would fail because the directors and scriptwriters and casting agents are simply not in tune with what Star Wars is meant to be like. They don't understand or know the atmosphere you want out of Star Wars, they don't give a shit about the tropes you think are crucial to Star Wars, they aren't interested in casting the type of people you imagine when you think "Star Wars", they aren't interested in making Thrawn cool or Luke into a capable honorable hero or showing a standard heroic journey.
        It won't happen the way you want it to. It's like expecting modern day Marvel to make a sincere western like Shane, they will just take their idea and make a Marvelized version of it with a black women in a CGI suit shooting death rays at CGI monsters.
        It's not going to happen. Stick to comics, novels, and games.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I feel like most people don't understand those books cost like $3 and there's at most 2 well written stories in 100s of novels.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, I hate Kennedy but pretending that EU was some treasure chest full of kino is a moron take. I'd say that like 90% of EU stuff is absolute garbage. And I have consoomed embarrasing amounts of it, partially why I know.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              The EU works. It’s the correct outline. Individual books varied in quality, but Luke Skywalker bringing back the Jedi Order and Leia/Han being New Republic power players while training the next generation and fighting off warlords is the correct direction to go.

              Nobody fricking cares about Rey Palpatine. Stop wasting shareholder dollars on a product nobody on Earth wants

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              Marvel has 90% shit fot 10% kino and they managed to get billions out of it. Batman has been making money loosely adapting shit from the comics where for each Long Halloween thry have 1000s of 60s-60s Batman and Robin play pranks on Superman comics. They only need to adapt the 1%.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This.

                They just need to adapt the timeline and thought character sketches. Make the best works into movies/ shows and ignore the rest

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >Marvel has 90% shit fot 10% kino
                maybe now, but most of their older movies were good. EU is mostly boring slop just like the SW sequels. that said, it would not be fricking hard at all to adapt the Thrawn trilogy and make far better movies than VII-IX

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Nope.

            Heir To The Empire sold for about $15 in 1991, which is the equivalent of $33 now

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      They have to oust her anyway because they have to make an example out of her so that other execs will make better choices. They, in this case, meaning the entire movie industry including its financiers, shareholders

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Which is really for the best. The world is improved by the fact that Star Wars is dead, that the series died with Lucas, that there is one less dead horse to beat endlessly. The ST was bad, but it was bad in the way that a sub decompressing in less than a millisecond is bad, as compared to losing power and becoming peepee poopoo bonechilling slowburn horror kino in the cold dark that would have been a Mandalorian tier ST.

      The sequel trilogy killed the franchise quickly and mercifully. Now something new can take its place, instead of yet another zombie franchise animated solely by transfusions of childless manchild cash desperate to recapture the last time they were happy.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >another zombie franchise animated solely by transfusions of childless manchild cash desperate to recapture the last time they were happy
        Damn. There's a lot of harsh truth there

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        there will be nothing new. no one in israeliteywood has any creativity left.
        it would have been so easy to adapt the dark horse expanded universe... but israelites gotta israelite. go woke go broke

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Excellent post.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You can't bring in a new studio head and redo Star Wars Episode 7, 8, 9..
      yes you can, homosexual, and for less money

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Fisher is dead, Ford would never do it again, and I doubt Hamill would either.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I don't care for the actors, they are as guilty as everyone here, also they were already dinosaurs in those movies
          and if you really care for them just deep fake them, invest those 300 million dollars in deep fake technology, shit can't get worse than what it is now

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            >they are as guilty as everyone here
            How? They signed on before Lucas sold. They didn't even know what Lucas was up to at the time, IIRC.
            >just deep fake them
            How about we just acceot that Star Wars ended in 1983?

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >How about we just acceot that Star Wars ended in 1983?
              I'm gonna be honest, I don't even care about sw, I'm a st fan (I accepted it died and the corpse is being raped to hell and back and necromancered to a second round) but they do this to everything they put their hands on

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              I only like two first movies and handful of games. I havent given shit about SW since kotor2.
              And most likely I won't give shit about sw ever again

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            i care. i liked the dark horse comics and the expanded universe

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            Just recast the Big 3, and make the Thrawn Trilogy. Then slowly introduce new characters along the way to expand out the franchise.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >and make the Thrawn Trilogy.

              But….you can.

              Chris Pratt (who has 2 billion dollar movies this year alone) could step right into Indiana Jones and make 3 or 4 of them over a decade easily and probably make $1+ billion box office on each one.

              The EU sold over 100 million books. Just adapt it and recast the Big 3, and make the Heir To The Empire trilogy, and then build out from there. There’s plenty of diversity in the EU anyway. Every single franchise recasts. There is no reason that Lucasfilm can’t do the same

              >and make the Heir To The Empire trilogy
              And the monkey's paw curls

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This movie will likely badly underperform. The fan base has had it with Kennedy. Not even “le grand finale of Indiana Jones” can make a dime with her involved.

                If Disney steals Heir To The Empire from the big 3 (which is basically the equivalent of adapting Harry Potter and leaving Harry Potter, Hermione, Ron Weasley out of it in favor of corporate knock-off characters) it will be another round of controversy, poor sales, etc. It will outperform the Rey movie, which will be a Flash-tier bomb, but it will still have mediocre returns.

                People have had it with Kennedy. Nobody is watching their D+ shows, or going to their movies anymore, or buying merchandise. Disney has to reboot and rebuild

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >says increasingly frustrated man-child for the 100th time

                KK is here to stay chud!

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Good, I want to see the mouse on fire and she's accelerating it with each of her pet projects

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Not a chud or a man-child, I’m married and comfortably upper middle class. I don’t care what Lucasfilm or Disney does, I’m merely commenting on what they should do from a business sense. It’s entertaining as frick watching Disney movie after Disney movie after Disney movie flop, and the stock sink while D+ sheds millions of subs. If Disney actually makes the Rey Palpatine movie, it will legitimately be one of the most hilarious flops in Hollywood history and provide an entire sector of the media landscape with NONSTOP content.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >will outperform the Rey movie
                You and me both know it will share the fate of all the other planned project, like Rogue Squadron, and be quietly cancelled after a few years in pre-production.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                This movie will likely badly underperform. The fan base has had it with Kennedy. Not even “le grand finale of Indiana Jones” can make a dime with her involved.

                If Disney steals Heir To The Empire from the big 3 (which is basically the equivalent of adapting Harry Potter and leaving Harry Potter, Hermione, Ron Weasley out of it in favor of corporate knock-off characters) it will be another round of controversy, poor sales, etc. It will outperform the Rey movie, which will be a Flash-tier bomb, but it will still have mediocre returns.

                People have had it with Kennedy. Nobody is watching their D+ shows, or going to their movies anymore, or buying merchandise. Disney has to reboot and rebuild

                Oh... I wasn't paying attention.

                >STAR WARS ACOLYTE HAS BEEN POSTPONED TO 2024.

                Jesus fricking Christ, it's going to get cancelled, isn't it? They're going to spend SIX YEARS on an eight episode miniseries.
                Imagine if Star Trek, Stranger Things, or any other series took SIX YEARS to film eight episodes.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                >They're going to spend SIX YEARS on an eight episode miniseries.
                Each episode is like Lawrence of Arabia quality though

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Its likely postponed due to the strike but series sounds like it's going to be trash that ends up pleasing no one.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                The cast will age a lot during that time

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                That's why they officially announced the casting of that troony, isn't it? They know it will be cancelled, so they want to get those sweet virtue points.

              • 11 months ago
                Anonymous

                Those casting news happened after rumors that the show was getting cancelled. Disney probably announced the troony just to convince people the show isn't cancelled yet.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You could do exactly what they should have done in the first place and make a new trilogy with only a very light connection to the originals. Bringing back the old geriatric trio was a bad idea, more money in the short term maybe but it was never gonna work even with a good script. They’re all old and none of them could act anymore and Carrie was busy being coked out of her mind until she snuffed it anyway.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >You can't bring in a new studio head and redo Star Wars Episode 7, 8, 9..
      you can, Sony rebooted spiderman immediately after amazing spiderman and no one gave a shit except andrew garfield
      >You can't bring Harrison Ford back to do another Indiana Jones in 5-10 years.
      AI exists
      >The IPs at Lucasfilm were extremely time sensitive and they really only had one shot to do anything with these properties. They fricked up every single time and now it's actually completely over.
      you know nothing about movies

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >comparing Spider-Man to Star Wars
        >insisting artificial intelligence can bring Harrison Ford in as Indiana Jones
        >tells me I know nothing about movies

        ya ok anon

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >yeah i know spiderman makes more money than star wars now but i'm an old head i think star wars has that potential
          >they already used AI in the recent movie
          >i just said that coz this is Cinemaphile

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Sony rebooted spiderman immediately after amazing spiderman and no one gave a shit except andrew garfield

        i always thought the amazing spiderman reboot was pretty quick after spiderman 3. raimi spiderman is the only good spiderman.
        btw, i hate orcs and hook noses; if that matters

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >i hate orcs and hook noses; if that matters
          It's the only thing that matters lel

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Even batman movies went through quick cycle. Batman and Robin 97. Begins 05. Dkr 2012. Batman vs superman 2016
          And now new batman 2022.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yes it's possible to remade Star Wars 7,8,9 with Han, Luke and Leia.

      With younger actors.

      Because it made no sense to put again so old actors in action movies like KK did.
      Or you put these old actors in action scenes, like they did, and it's fricking ridiculous.
      Or you put them on a chair, but who wants to see his childhood heroes acting like that in a whole movie?

      Or it's possible to focus on new characters, with a short CGI guest-appearance of old Han, Luke and Leia.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    honestly its kind of hard to truly frick up so often, give a random off the street her power and everything would improve

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You forgot the huge StarCruiser flop

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Indy 5 was the last chance for Lucasfilm. They have no other IPs to milk

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous
      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        howard is MCU now hes with disney and marvel now

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous
        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          so much uglier than the lucas version. no way he knows quack-fu

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      What until you get gen z American graffiti

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    literally diversity.

    They've ridden the only bad people dislike this movies to prove everyone right. Doing so would probably cause an investor scare because all those moronic firms giving you credit points for catering to rainbow people think this shit is good because they don't want zoomers going occupy wall street like millennials did and have to get people into liking them by pretending to care about LGBT shit.

    In the end, all these execs get paid their salaries with stock, because if they were paid in cash they'd be taxed to hell and back so they just hoard stock, make it raise by catering to rainbow shit, bankers in New york are Happy, they get to double their portfolio and never pay a dime in taxes because they live off some ultra fancy american express card and they just pay their credit cards fees by releasing stock directly from their portfolio's to the bank.

    All the while, the people who is holding that stock long term due to the promised dividends (that's your 401 k waggie) will get fricked, because this bubble will inevitably burst. At some point investors will realize disney is hemorrhaging money, by then all these woke executives would have sold their shares at peak value and would be enjoying their life talking shit on twitter about how they saved the world.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the disney stock value is already half what it once was

  18. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    she must have photos of execs fricking kids or something, there's no other way a moronic coffee gopher rises to the top and is as untouchable as kennedy is

  19. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Being a woman in modern western society is a golden ticket.

  20. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Infant sacrifices

    I'm just going to put that out there. The occult power they can generate is immense, even one or two a year would enable someone to keep a high paying job. Has anyone checked the garden of her Brentwood estate for baby skeletons lately?

  21. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does she do it?
    she is doing what she is being paid for

  22. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    #SkywalkersForeverFrickKathleenKennedy
    #TheForceIsNonBinaryNotFemaleFrickKathleenKennedy

    THREE TIMES A CURSE UPON KATHLEEN KENNEDY AND EVERYTHING SHE TOUCHES
    THREE TIMES A CURSE UPON KATHLEEN KENNEDY AND EVERYTHING SHE TOUCHES
    THREE TIMES A CURSE UPON KATHLEEN KENNEDY AND EVERYTHING SHE TOUCHES

  23. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Congo was the only good movie she made and it was almost ruined by casting her likeness as the female lead

  24. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Or we could have had, what, around a dozen completely new super high budget films and all you need out of that is two or three to take off. All this IP/franchise/property/fake nostalgia shit needs to frick off. How many times. It clearly doesn't work.
    Captcha:WWANK2

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      yeah... just two more movies... then we will get a hit and be back to normal... just two more movies

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Hell they're trying that now with shit like Toy Story 5, Frozen 3 and Zootopia 2.

        But nostalgia doesn't sell that well lightyear is proof enough of that.

  25. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She has a deadman's switch.

  26. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I used to be annoyed by grifters shitting on her but at this point she really has a lot of blunders under her. New blood seems like the beat solution.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Does your dad know you used to be gay?

  27. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Willow reboot
    lmao. that's the one with two dikes in modern clothes in a fantasy setting

  28. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does she do it?

    She knows where the bodies are.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Oh and uh, Ms Kennedy? Just one more thing...
      >You say you didn't have no source material ta work with here, no books or comics ta help ya out with these Star Wars sequels. You had to come up with absolutely everythin' on yer own with no idea what might work, right?
      >Alright thank you, just wanted to double check my notes were right. And I, ah, sorry if I was splitting any Heirs there, heh.

  29. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She knows where the bodies are buried.

  30. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kennedy has dirt on Lucas raping Ewok children and Spielberg didling and murdering the girl from Poltergiest.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Lucas raped Warwick Davis?

  31. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does she do it?
    She has a vegana. It's the only "skill" she ever had.

  32. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She has been sucking dick in Hollywood since the 70's and probably has a mountain of dirt on the entire industry.

  33. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    We can't forget she's already responsible of one of the biggest failure of cinema history :

    SOLO

    Budget : 275 millions, some journalists estimated 300 millions (one of the most expensive movie EVER).
    Marketing : between 150 and 200 millions.

    Worlwide box-office : 392 millions only !
    https://www.boxofficemojo.com/release/rl1954383361/

    Remember when Bill Mechanic was fired by Fox, after the colossal success of Titanic.. and the failure of Anastasia.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Indiana Jones and the Dilation of Diversity will outflop this.

  34. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    katie still living in most of /tv head, rent free of course 😉

  35. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Turns Star Wars from a safe money printer to a risky endeavor that will probably lose money
    based
    safe money printer is boring

  36. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    People like to say she has blackmail dirt on VIPs but the most likely answer is that Lucas probably had it written into his contract that Lucasfilm retains autonomy after the sale and can only fire its own employees regardless of Disney's wishes. It's exactly the kind of thing he'd insist on and he talked about protecting Lucasfilm jobs under Disney several times.

  37. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    her entire career, her only success came when she was being carried by geniuses like Spielberg

  38. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She a fall guy for disney execs. Focus on the woman and not the israelite producuers.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nice try, Kath. You'll be going down soon enough

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You're fricking moronic. That Irish c**t eats israelites for breakfast. She's massacred more heebs than Titus. Disney israelites sleep with one eye open thanks to her.

  39. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Her position is perfect because it just means if you complain about her it's because you're a sexless incel who can't deal with female leaders

  40. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The real redpill is that even though she’s an unlikable talentless c**t she’s doing significant damage to Disney so she’s accidentally doing good work. I hope she makes many more huge expensive flops in the near future for the house of mouse.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      This. I haven't watched any of the new Disney movies (including Star Wars), but I have been following this c**t's work and I hope she burns that company to the ground. It's not even incompetence, she's truly insane.

  41. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    nufeminism disables all punishment of incompetence.

  42. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do you think he expected this outcome?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Wasn't she Spielberg's coffee maker? So Lucas definitely knew her. Either Spielberg stuck his dick where he shouldn't have, and Lucas knew, or she's just your avarage assistant who doesn't understand shit about film making, and Lucas knew.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Wasn't she Spielberg's coffee maker?
        yeah and she even had an "office romance" and shacked up with one of his producers ie she is literally pam from the office who somehow fricked her way to being in charge of star wars

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you think he expected this outcome?
      I think he planned on it.
      >Oh you think my prequels sucked? Well enjoy Disney Star Wars muhahahaha

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He has 4.4 billion reasons to not give a shit

  43. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Turns Star Wars from a safe money printer to a risky endeavor that will probably lose money
    Lucas already did this. The Phantom Menace was so controversial that Attack of the Clones had the lowest box office in the series (for the main saga, if you ccount the spin-offs that would be the Clone Wars movie)

  44. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Produces Indiana Jones film that’s on track to be one of the biggest flops in Hollywood history
    Indy 5 already made more, than the Flash

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      No, it hasn’t, you 60 IQ mouseBlack person.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn't matter. Indy 5 is still a much better movie.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          >i really enjoyed the biggest flop in Hollywood history
          Congratulations for having shit taste homosexual but you’re irrelevant and your movie is cratering

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >made more, than the Flash
      Is that really a good benchmark?

  45. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    At this point it`s safe to say they probably can`t fire her. Maybe there is a clause on the acquisition contract of the company or something...

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      People here don't realize the executives are never "fired" in a traditional sense. They "step down", usually after taking a "leave of absence" first.

  46. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    So is that film about the wookie planet just dead and gone now? I thought that actually may have been a good idea for a setting.

    I mean I know they would have made the story suck that's obvious, but it would have made for a good set up and I think people would like to know more about the wookie race backstory sort of like with the mandalorians. I guess they'd have to subtitle the film which wouldn't work for Disney?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine a film of just constant rrrROOOWWWRRRR

  47. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    she knows where all the bodies are burried, on Little Saint James Island

  48. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She sucks a mean dick

  49. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >turns star wars into risky endeavor
    aka based OP
    frick you and the last jedi is the best star wars movie without question, bar none

  50. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Ive never expected much from any of these post-Lucas. I dont know why he just gave the rights for anyone to be able to write shit fan fiction as canon though. Its like letting your child be adopted by crack smoking trannies.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      in ur case an improvement

  51. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She was the same as Maxwell & Epstein but for Los Angeles/Hollywood branch. She has too many secrets. Why do you think she became Spielberg's secretary out of nowhere?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      She has polaroids from the '80s; camcorder footage from the '90s; mobile phone videos from the '00s. She isn't going anywhere.

      She knows where the bodies are buried, both literally and figuratively. She’s got Epstein Island pictures, and she knows what really happened to Heather O’Rourke.

      She fricked Lucas' and Spielberg's brains out several decades ago and knows where all the skeletons are buried. Many such cases!

      do you actually believe that

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Yes.

  52. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Don't forget she also insisted that the theme parks featured the (deeply unpopular) sequel characters and lore instead of the OT's. This b***h is braindead.

  53. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She has polaroids from the '80s; camcorder footage from the '90s; mobile phone videos from the '00s. She isn't going anywhere.

  54. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She knows where the bodies are buried, both literally and figuratively. She’s got Epstein Island pictures, and she knows what really happened to Heather O’Rourke.

  55. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She fricked Lucas' and Spielberg's brains out several decades ago and knows where all the skeletons are buried. Many such cases!

  56. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Luke Skywalker is a homosexual now, it is canon.

  57. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    The force is female, chuds.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Then it should come back from space, and directly into the kitchen

  58. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    >How does she do it?

    Because she took a camera with her to Epstein's island.

  59. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    SAAAAAAY IT -

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      the prequels are shit george

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        Wrong.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Remmeber when initially Disney tried to replace all the alien races with their new OCs? Jesus Christ, those are terrible.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          Honestly no scene in the ST is as kino as that one in EP3.

          ?t=87

  60. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    She's been fired. Announcement soon.
    She'll be working at Netflix.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >She'll be working at Netflix.
      Perfect

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >she’s been fired
      Okay doomcuck. Two more weeks.

  61. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's surreal how fast Star Wars' cultural capital dried up almost immediately after TLJ

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yet they are doing another set of movies with the same universe and cast
      lol lmao
      Somethings not right

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      JJ did the same with Star Trek.

      At a surface level it was a servicable "reboot" but it essentially wiped out all that Trek was and instead created a vapid product with no substance.

      TLJ did the same. Characters are running around and quipping, things are happening, stuff exploding but the context and the point to it is simply not there. It's like an amusement park ride.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        JJ trek wasn't that bad. Maybe 2 movie. But other wise it was fine.
        Bigger issue was. It never pivoted to anything else. It was just there. And eventually we just got those soulless tv shows

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        JJ trek wasn't that bad. Maybe 2 movie. But other wise it was fine.
        Bigger issue was. It never pivoted to anything else. It was just there. And eventually we just got those soulless tv shows

        JJ Trek at least had the benefit of explicitly setting itself in an alternate universe from the beginning, rather than it being a cheap replacement/copy of the originals or, like what happened with Star Wars and now Indy, a sequel that's meant to take place in the same continuity despite being drastically different in style and quality
        tbh I still think the 2009 Star Trek is a solid space action adventure. It's barely anything like actual Trek, but if you can ignore that and take it as a separate thing, I find it fun enough. At any rate, the cast is pretty great. Into Darkness sucked ass, leaning into the worst of JJ's nostalgiabait hackery, while Beyond was just kind of lame and undercooked

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          I like first and third movie. I just wish they had made at least one pure exploration movie. Just 90 min. Crew get stuck on ship snd have to figure way out.
          Imagine how cheep it would be. Just build ship set and never leave it

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      star wars used to be an event; when a new movie came out, it had been years since the last one. you were excited to see where the story went. now it's semi-annual slop and nobody cares anymore. the mystery and charm are gone

  62. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Reminder that Disney owes Comcast 27 billion $ by next year

  63. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Miss me yet?

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I miss this homie like you wouldn't believe
      Gave us kinos. If some c**t had to suck his dick for that, I say that's a fair trade. All woman are bawds anyways, who gives a frick.
      Also, it's hilarious that Jennifer Lawerences career has completely nosedived since he's been gone. How many times do you think she was caked in ol' Harvey boys disgusting yellow tinged smelly cum?

  64. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    You're just jeallous you can't hatefrick Kathleen Kennedy. Do you think she has a casting couch? What does she do to the male actors?

  65. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's pretty wild how Disney went from a top dawg in 2019 to massive severe woes right now with a string of money losing enterprises. Maybe they shouldn't have tried to replace netflix?

  66. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Her motives are complex

  67. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I HAVE ARRIVED WITH THE LIST!

    CANCELLED PROJECTS
    >Rogue Squadron
    >The Rian Johnson Trilogy
    >The Taika Watiti Trilogy
    >The Benioff and Weiss Trilogy
    >The Boba Fett Movie
    >The Boba Fett Movie #2
    >The Lando Carlissian Movie
    >The Obi-Wan Kenobi Movie
    >The Kevin Feige Movie
    >The Solo Sequels
    >Rangers of the New Republic

    AXED PROJECTS
    >Star Wars: Resistance
    >The David Cage Video Game
    >Knights of the Old Republic Remake #1
    >Book of Boba Fett: Season 2
    >Kenobi: Season 2

    PROJECTS HEAVILY RESHOT (at least 50%)
    >Rogue Squadron
    >Solo: A Star Wars Story
    >Kenobi: Season 1
    >Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker

    >QUIETLY CANCELLED
    >The Taika Watiti Movie
    >The Shawn Levy Movie

  68. 11 months ago
    Anonymous
    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Here's a Polish movie poster.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        How about an upgrade?

  69. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Merrin.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *