>undefeatable wand. >grindelwald loses it to dumbledore in a fair duel

>undefeatable wand
>grindelwald loses it to dumbledore in a fair duel
so what's the point of this shit?

>uhhhm actually it's not a literal deathly hallow it's just a powerful artifact made by a skilled wizard
so how is it different from a regular dollar store wand? the cloak works indefinitely, the stone summons ghosts. but the wand seems like a regular wand

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >gay wizard has a wand shaped like anal beads
    nice one rowling

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the one asian is named ching chong
      >the one irish blows everything up
      >the gay wizard has anal bead wand
      i kneel

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    why did they intentionally make the wand so repulsive looking

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      jrpg logic. i think it looks cool

      The deathly hallows should have been the three sacred treasures.

      i was the biggest fan of HP as a youth but book 7 is a huge downgrade.
      >video game collectathon side quest for a plot
      >a second collectathon gets mixed up in there somewhere
      >extremely predictable and generic Aslan/Jesus victory over voldemort
      >hedwig dies, dobby dies, now were grown ups get it????
      >core characters are now charmless adults but somehow repeat their same old adolescent conflicts

      it feels like rowling died and got replaced by a Christopher Tolkien type successor. one good theory ive read on Cinemaphile though is that most of the text was written by committee, with JK herself as more of a head writer than the sole author, starting with Chamber and increasing with Goblet. The only ones written with little outside help were the first and last ones. That would actually explain a lot, as the first and last books are the most unique in tone

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        Didn't Hedwig die in the fifth book?

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          no, Hedwig dies in one of the first few chapters of book 7, in the battle of the 7 potters

          Sirius dies in book 5

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        When did Terry Pratchett start getting dementia? If it coincides with a nosedive in the structure and development of certain factors, then it's 100% he was on the writing committee. Neil Gaiman was likely involved too (since he never made a fuss about Potter being a clear riff on The Books of Magic), but he needed Pratchett to bring Good Omens back under control when they were writing together before. Pratchett was the expert/genius at tracking multiple-character development and world-building/expansion. Readers of the Discworld books said he fell off hard on that stuff towards the end.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      Skeleton Finger.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol this homosexual wants to talk about wands. Go ask your fairy godmother, gaylord

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The deathly hallows should have been the three sacred treasures.

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    I thought it was one one of those urethral sounding rods

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >but the wand seems like a regular wand
    it was able to repair Harry's wand, something that should have been impossible, so it's obviously got some extra power

    then again the movies never show that because the movies are directed/written by hacks who can't understand something as fricking simple as a teenager's book series

  7. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    In one of the movies, the girl had a literal time streaming device, this alone blowed the frick out the “deathly hollows” in terms of utility and application

    It only existed for one movie, it was never mentioned or used again

    What the frick?

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      The number of plot holes and moronic nonsense that the time turner introduced into the story of just that one book made Rowling drop it, and hope the reader would eventually forget it ever existed.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I think she made the time turners get destroyed in the dept of mysteries (along with the prophecy snowglobes). might just be my headcanon though

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lol, I just looked it up and you're right.
          >Whoopsie, we accidentally stored all of our time traveling devices right next to all the snow globes that contain recorded prophesies because what could go wrong with that?
          >*everything gets destroyed by a group of teenagers*

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            it was a good save imo because those hourglass things were moronic. honestly she could have described them any other way in Prisoner and avoided breaking the lore.
            >a rare magical creature hermione captured in the forbidden forest
            >a forbidden chamber behind professor mcg's office that only works within the castle grounds and at certain times of day
            just off the top of my head. Prisoner is good but overrated in the series

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              The idea that you would entrust a device like that to a teenage girl just so she can essentially "cheat" and take more classes than other students by attending multiple at the same time is absolutely moronic. First of all Hermione is depicted as smart, but she never demonstrates some megamind superhuman genius level IQ that would warrant her being given special privileges like being able to literally control time, and effectively clone herself. I won't even get into all the infinite ways to frick up the plot with holes and paradoxes.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              Honestly the time turners' "deterministic time ring" effect is one of the best renditions of time travel

              • 5 months ago
                Anonymous

                There were witnesses to the duel, though.

                the implication is that dumble sucked his life out through his dick, no wand required, avada cunningula technique

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Lol, I just looked it up and you're right.
          >Whoopsie, we accidentally stored all of our time traveling devices right next to all the snow globes that contain recorded prophesies because what could go wrong with that?
          >*everything gets destroyed by a group of teenagers*

          it was a retcon, they destroyed lots of them in the book but it was never stated they were all destroyed

          The implication is supposed to be that there was no epic duel. Dumbledore used their past association to stun him when his back was turned or something.

          it literally was described as an epic duel

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            It is first mentioned as an epic duel by an old man at a party giving a second hand account.

            • 5 months ago
              Anonymous

              There were witnesses to the duel, though.

  8. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    >so how is it different from a regular dollar store wand
    It does things that normal Wands can't, but it isn't some invincible wand where you can never be defeated. If that were the case, it would never be lost in the first place.

    The stone also isn't perfect either, it summons up only reflections of what people were in life, there's still a veil that cannot be crossed. The cloak is perhaps the closest to perfect, but even so it isn't flawless, it's "just" an invisibility cloak that won't wear out.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      wow thank you for paraphrasing the op fricking moron

  9. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    these are gay books for children written by a woman and you expect logic? kek

  10. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you're over the age of 20 then you need to get a life

  11. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    these books were for children, written by a woman

  12. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    The implication is supposed to be that there was no epic duel. Dumbledore used their past association to stun him when his back was turned or something.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      False. Dumbledore was a known top and after he first mounted Grindelwald, and every subsequent time, the wand would forever see him as it's true master.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        In an alternate universe where Me Too never happened we got a gay love story between Jude Law and Jack Frost-I mean Jack Sparrow.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *