>Wail about how cinema is nothing but franchiseslop these days
>Something original and fresh comes out, everyone who sees it loves it
>Wail about imagined paedophiles having never even seen the film
Why is Cinemaphile like this?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Jerma really got fricked up.
couldn't think of a more reddit trio
>Reddit
Intellectual stunting is not a way to go through life.
I thought the same but Mark Ruffalo's character is fricking amazing. Cinemaphile the character if there ever was one.
>pedro pascal
>chris pratt
>hunter shchafer
Chris Pratt isn't reddit, he's been soft-cancelled (i.e. people online talk shit about him) for years now due to him being a practicing Christian
>due to him being a practicing Christian
The craziest part is he isn't some bible thumper he's just a "god bless you" kind of person. I don't know what there even is to be mad about
Most of Cinemaphile just waits for torrents so stop expecting anything until the 'digital' release.
the fall of rarbg and it's consequences have been a dissaster for the Cinemaphile board
I didn't think killing of a sacred deer was really that good so I've held off from giving yorgos my money for now. I'll torrent poor things to give him a chance because I'm not heartless.
I haven't seen it, but I heard that Emma Stone's character has a brain of a child and that the movie makes it very obvious that she's supposed to be mentally 5 or somewhere around that age. If any of that is what the movie is, then it is 100% a pedo movie.
On the contrary, Cinemaphile had a thread about having sex with a moron (Emma in the film) and what it'd be like? I think it's "moron porn".
She's a woman like all her movies. Why did this surprise you?
It's lolobaba kino? Torrenting this shit as we speak...
In the movie her brain develops far faster than the brain would in the body of a child. By the boat segment she's reading Emerson, so clearly she doesn't have the equivalent brain of an infant then. There's some ambiguity about it because while her cognitive abilities improve quickly, her understanding of language improves but her sentences remain somewhat wonky, but her mindset remains essentially that of a child with no predispositions or ingrained understanding of etiquette, sexual morality or The Way The World Works. The brain swap premise is basically a way to tell a variation of Candide by way of Frankenstein, a story about a comedically naive character exploring a variety of different aspects of society with no ingrained dispositions, with her naiveté often getting her into trouble.
For the people assuming that the movie is just cryptic pedobait, while Bella's exact mental age when she first has sex is somewhat vague because of the disparity between her cognitive abilities and her childlike mindset, none of the sex scenes have any hint of her acting like a kid; you could watch them without context and they would just look like normal albeit often weird and kinky sex scenes.
Wew look at all that pedo cope
>Original and fresh
>Is just another boring, luciferian, 'subversive' piece to wear you down and drain your soul.
Miss me with that shit.
of the few real posters still here, about 90% don't even really like movies.
The Iron Claw hasn't gotten any traction either.
Kino is about exploring ideas therefore a kinosseur must be open to new ideas and experiences. Instead people seem to view everything as an exercise to assert their existing ideas onto everyone's experiences.
>I haven't seen it...
>...then it is 100% a pedo movie
And yet you would claim you are able to consent to sex despite having the brain of a child hmmm curious
>people seem to view everything as an exercise to assert their existing ideas
that's the fastest way to feel like you "won" an exchange on the internets
>someone makes a statement
>ignore content, respond to a vaguely similar kind of statement that you have a zinger ready for
>dopamine hit because a part of your monkey brain thinks you just raised your tribal status
Ok your response confirms it's a pedo movie. No I'm not interested in seeing it
Cinemaphile is blue /b/
No torrent no watch. Iron claw hit public trackers a couple of days ago and the threads started coming in. Next week we'll probably have critical mass of viewership to have Iron Claw-The Definitive Edition Thread which we will then repeat for the rest of the year until Efron face is not fun.
You have to understand this place is basically about hating everything and pretending you’re oppressed as a circlejerk hugbox for bitter losers and incels. It isn’t about enjoying things and discussing about that.
Not OP but yeah wow this movie really made that clear. I don't know many people who saw it IRL but discussing it here is almost impossible.
Go back to r/film then ya homos. Cinemaphile is a shitposting and meme board!
Sorry for gatekeeping, but seriously, there's a dozen quality online outlets for film discussion. You don't like the way we play, take your ball and go home.
I won't tell you again. 1 strike and you're out!
I've never used re'ddit in my life and I don't plan to start. I much prefer the anonymous dynamic of Cinemaphile whereby people aren't constantly tripping over themselves to have the "correct" opinion for some social reward. That said a lot of posters on this board do exactly that just with (you)s instead of re'ddit gold. I would suggest instead that if you are this kind of poster you go back to re'ddit.
8/8
What makes it so good?
Not interested. Simple as. I have a backlog of 800 films to go through.
Pointless nude scenes the movie
>Cinemaphile is now sperging out about nudity in their R rated films
kill youself you 80s christcuck larper
*raises paw* what film?
Economicaly-Challenged Doodads
>original
>just frankenstein but the scientist fricks his monster and she’s a bawd
>same tired old wokeslop of the last 20 years
>fresh and original
Nice bait, the only thing new about it is that now they're promoting pedophilia instead of homosexuality, they're preparing the public consciousness to bring back the P to the LGBT.
Because /misc/'s mission is to ruin everything, absolutely everything in the name of making people miserable and pissed off, because they believe that helps they gay political causes.
This film is literally about dudes running a train on a woman with the brain of a child. There’s nothing to defend here
Yeah they also made a gay fricking Hollywood ending totally different from the book
It's just a movie anon
>The /misc/tard is immunized against all dangers: One may call him a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a /misc/tard and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: "I’ve been found out"
Most people on the planet are /misc/. You are not welcome in these lands.
>everybody that dislikes my pedo movie is my personal boogieman or strawman I've built in my head
Just go back to where you came from already
Misc just tells the truth. If that ruins things for you then it says a lot about your level of intelligence and maturity.
>Misc just tells the truth
Imagine actually believing this
>Misc just tells the truth.
I saw this movie last night and I fricking loved it. It was so funny.
An anon with a working brain, on Cinemaphile? Impossible
This movie is just like a Wes Anderson movie. It tries so hard to be quirky, that it just becomes cringe inducing. The movie is shot terribly with very ugly colour grading and sets. I don't hate this movie because I am bitter or because it's modern, I just don't think it's good.
sure /misc/yp boy, the movie is ugly when it has stunning visuals and photography, at least the puritans screeching about imaginary pedos aren't so dishonest...
>Stunning visuals
Watch more movies. Good movies preferably
>Good movies preferably
I'm posting in a thread about one, but I'll take your recommendations (I won't) chuddie
If you have to side with pedos to "own the chuds"..... you fricked up, son.
im just not gonna watch anything made a dude named yorgos. ahahah give me a break
>Something original and fresh comes out
it's literally just The Bride of Frankenstein goes to college in the style of Jean-Pierre Jeunet's City of Lost Children
Watch more movies.
>It's literally X+Y+Z
You can describe almost any movie like this, moron, this is not the own you think it is
They're better IPs out there than Satanic Marxist Straight White Man hating dyke pedophilic dog crap!
I mean yeah if you call movies "IP"s this is the type of take I would expect you to have. Stick to capeshit lil chuddie.
>original
It's based on a novel from 1992.
I am not watching anything with a female lead.
/thread
Literally Animebrain the movie
>Umm, she's not actually a child. She's a full grown woman with the brain of a child implanted in her mind.
>She's really an adult, but only acts like a child because her brain is literally a child.
>Look, She's descov3ring sexual intimacy as an adult, but she only has a 5 year Olds brain haha
Althouse films are just excuses for homosexual perverts to get celebrities to act out their fetishes.
It's literally the same movie as Barbie but with sex.
And she is mentally at the very least a teenager by the time she has sex. She's in her rebellious phase. Her mind grows exponentially to catch up.
>2 hours of artsy feminist slop with a message that can be boiled to "women having sex with hundreds of strangers is the only way they can be liberated"
the proof that no one watched it is that it isn't even generating rage threads for it's cartoonishly provocative content. total apathy.
Emma is in her prime but Ruffalo's nasty body could blind a person
>why is Cinemaphile like this?
The people who worked on it think the same thing.
The irony is that it is the opposite
The real irony is that these people are projecting their own inability to separate art from politics onto their dreaded political foes (with whom they are probably unknowingly in contact with every time they leave their house). This phenomenon occurs because leftists are rarely, if ever, forced to confront criticisms of their ideology. For decades, the mass media and internet complex have created a nice, little safe space where they never have to hear anything that contradicts their very well manufactured political opinions.
Yorgos fronts like he's artsy and not a coomer but you can tell he's obviously a coomer.
Dude what the frick is wrong with Dafoe's face? Is nobody going to mention that. Did he just show up on set like that.
prolly wearing a mask or prosthetic
I'm not sure what kind of discussion you're expecting with an OP like this. I'm not even sure who you're mad at. This is probably the only place where people have actually seen this movie, let alone enjoyed it. I'm genuinely confused by your post.
>This is probably the only place where people have actually seen this movie, let alone enjoyed it.
Anon, have you seen the replies in this thread? All the threads about Poor Things on Cinemaphile have been like this, with 1-2 replies here & there from anons who've actually seen it and liked it
>rarbg is gone
Wish I could watch it
Mate, this is like your 100th shill thread. Please have a nice day. There is nothing original and fresh about this movie from the Jeunet-style visuals to the discordant score. Everything has already been done before in cinema which is why it is a dead medium.