>wanted new Barbie animated series badly
>see Barbie movie last night
>no longer want Barbie animated series
>wanted new Barbie animated series badly. >see Barbie movie last night. >no longer want Barbie animated series
>wanted new Barbie animated series badly
>see Barbie movie last night
>no longer want Barbie animated series
New thing bad
yes
Unironically
It was awful, yes. It wasn’t even a movie, it was just talking points pretending to be dialogue.
My wife hated it.
Oh, your wife hated it?? oh shit I guess it sucked then.
Your wife has good taste, sir
Bad thing is bad and the fact that is new is just a coicidence
The movie is for women and girls only. It’s not a movie made for men. Chill out.
>It's a movie that hates at least 50% of all life on Earth
Cool.
Men are less than 50% now lol.
Ah but it hates women that don't hate men.
And women still think they're the opressed demographic, ain'ta funny.
>And women still think they're the opressed demographic
Meanwhile you'll spread israeli elite conspiracies without any self-awareness
If you were going to be as attractive as you are now, born into the same area and circumstances, would you really have preferred to be born as a woman?
Why don’t you turn into a woman and live on easy mode then?
>Why don’t you turn into a woman
That will never be a real thing
No. Men are the majority. It's 50.5% to 49.5% males to females.
sauce? It's very rare there's more men than women, cause men tend to do stupid things that get themselves killed, as well as generally being seen as disposable and being killed.
Male birthrates are generally higher than that of females, but the higher male death rate negates this.
China is the only place that has more men than women, and this was achieved manually.
Every time someone writes that it shows they didn't spend a single second thinking about it.
The movie is shitting on Ken being an idiot, not on men.
Unless you identify with very man in media.
Surely you don't do that anon, right?
That's only something dumb femoids do after all.
>ignores that Ken was completely justified in his actions
i identify with ken. he did nothing wrong
The movie wasn't even shitting on Ken. He had large comedy value, yes, but he also did have a character arc, and you felt sympathy for him. It's just that the growth Ken got as a character, is what a female characters often get in "female empowerment" narratives, which rarely is done with a male character, so I guess to men that was awful and emasculating?
I loved Ken, and would have him as my "and Ken" anytime.
Is that why they spent so much time making you know that the patriarchy is bad and that women have it harder than men? Is that why they had a whole scene of men nonstop sexually harassing Barbie? Or a man talking about how great the patriarchy is and men secretly run it all? Or then bringing up the Mattel CEOs being all men nonstop?
It's actually incredible how many anons lack even the very most basic media literacy
Who's teaching you terms like that? They're a bad influence, I don't want you seeing them anymore.
I mean so many people even lack basic reading comprehension skills these days…
go back
Somebody isn't Kenlightened.
There's a lot of movies that aren't for women
How many movies coming out today are anti-women though?
Oppenheimer, Mission Impossible, Sound Of Freedom
>Sound Of Freedom
>anti women
How?
Saving Children I guess?
There's a fun setup for an abortion joke here I just can't articulate it
Even if you got it out, it would still be dead on arrival.
Right now? Could've fooled me
>making something for a specific audience means you hate everyone else
No, but hating men means you hate men.
So nearly every movie made in the last 100 years?
It doesn't have to be a movie made for men. It's the divisive message that pisses normal people off. It's annoying that feminism became about torturing men and these films telling women that they cant do ANYTHING to make a man happy ever, because that's "anti-woman". I don't hate women, and I'm not an incel. In an ideal world, men would do things to make women happy, and women would do the same for men. But that can't exist in this world, because a bunch of sociopaths (lesbians) control the hollywood industrial complex. It takes men like me who are perfectly fine with women working, sex-positivity, whatever the frick and makes me "hate" women as a category and completely reject liberalism because these people are actively trying to destroy my group, and a bunch of rich, powerful white women are telling me im privaleged and evil because i have a dick. its sickening and theyve done more damage to their own movement than any right-wing turbo chudlet could ever do.
It cannot be that bad
>It's core message is unironically, "it's ok when we do it."
It can and is.
I do plan on watching it so I'll see if it really is that bad. I know how much people can exaggerate these things
Andrew Tate clam down.
I hate Andrew Tate, illiterate homosexual. Go suck wiener or something troony.
Okay Trump.
when you bought a ticket to this movie, were you already thinking 'this is going to be a movie made by feminists that hate men' and did you judge it through that viewpoint?
The whole message of the movie is that men and women should exist in an egalitarian state, both the patriarchy and matriarchy are shown to have serious flaws in that they create dependence and feelings of inadequacy in their oppressed class. The Kens spell this shit out in the ending when they explain how unappreciated they feel, how little they have. Theyre filling the social role woman do under patriarchy and that role is whats shown to be problematic because of what it does to people. The narrator cheekily points out that the Kens receiving a very minor presence in the Barbieland government is analogous to the progress made by women under patriarchy. This is a deliberate framing to highlight how much woman are not yet emancipated from at the very least the legacy of patriarchy if not currently existing patriarchal structures.
The movie doesnt "hate men", frankly of you think that youre a sensitive and feeble creature with a glass spine. The movie's message is that "its barbie and its ken" and that neither world needs to be "its barbie and ken" or "its ken and barbie". Its a celebation of individuality and a rejection of calcifying social norms enforced by a power hungry collective.
Well said anon, well said.
Personally I loved it and almost everything about it, Will Ferrell was funny but felt like he wasn't needed.
He was funny and i liked his board room entourage but he was absolutely not necessary and definitely made me think they got him in that role because of lego movie. He works well as a willy wonka type though and helps to gloss over the mechanics of the world.
I kind of like how he's genuinely seems to care about making girls happy but is still a corporate suit.
That really does sell everything about the movie, also Lizzos song was great kind of disappointed the darker version of the song isn't on the soundtrack.
>gibs me dat
>A woman can accuse an innocent man of rape and be believed with little evidence. The man will have his life ruined just because the woman wanted to hurt the guy for her own sick satisfaction.
>A women can physically abuse a man but the man can't fight back. He fights back, she calls the police and accuses him of domestic violence. Doesn't matter if he looks more hurt than her, he'll still get arrested.
>Women can coast on their looks and get all this special treatment but a man actually has to work hard to get anywhere.
>A woman will hate all men due to bad experiences with the bad boys and think all men are like that. Due to her attentions being on just the bad boys and not even looking at the good guys, she'll generalize them all.
>It is much easier for a woman to get laid than it is for a man. A man has to work for it unless he's very attractive and charming which most aren't. Yet when women get called out for being total hos, they'll point to a man getting praised for being a player, not understanding that pulling so much tail is hard to do and most can't do it.
Most men don't have power. Only the 1% of men do. The other 99% have to work for those guys and struggle with getting shit on for the actions of their bosses. Being a man is hard.
>A woman can accuse an innocent man of rape and be believed with little evidence
Because this helps prevent rape and punish rapists and few people lie about being raped. Within living memory it wasnt even legally possible for a wife to report that her busband raped her
>women can physically abuse a man but the man can't fight back. He fights back, she calls the police and accuses him of domestic violence
Women cant as a class get away with domestic abuse, you have no evidence of that. But yes male on female violence tends be seen as more brutal because males tend to be stronger.
>Women can coast on their looks and get all this special treatment
Attractive *people* coast off their looks. You know what lifes like for ugly girls? You think its fun to judged entirely on your appearance?
>A woman will hate all men due to bad experiences
Getting mad at traumatized women wont make them sleep with you.
>It is much easier for a woman to get laid than it is for a man
Ok? Its just sex.
>Yet when women get called out for being total hos
Because there isnt anything wrong with enjoying your sexuality and men have abused and controlled women for a long time on the grounds of sexual "propriety" and ownership.
>Most men don't have power.
True.
>Only the 1% of men do.
Not true, this is a gradient. The 1% just has the most out of all the capitalist class. I find it hard to believe you seriously look at the world and think that of the rest of the 99% of the population power in all forms is shared equally by the sexes.
>>Only the 1% of men do.
>Not true, this is a gradient. The 1% just has the most out of all the capitalist class. I find it hard to believe you seriously look at the world and think that of the rest of the 99% of the population power in all forms is shared equally by the sexes.
Man make up for 90% of the homeless, are less represented on universities, on books being published, get harsher sentences while doing the same crime, do most of the risky work while women are shilled into positions of power for being women AND basically all media that focused on men as a target demographic has been shamed and modified to appeal to women.
Men also control the vast majority of wealth, own most of the land, are most of the politicians, have most of the social power in the most populated parts of the world, have had centuries of unarguably dominance over women and have by and large been the sex of the people who arranged this system where they end up homeless. Youll notice they also arent raped as much, forced to bare children as much or (my favorite) not even considered worthy of being studied as a category of human by medical science for the majority of its modern existence.
Are you dense? Or just desperate to force people into boxes? Yes men are also oppressed by wealthier men, we are talking about hierarchies within hierarchies here. And i might add in the context of a movie that shares my view that individuals should be invididually considered and that this whole patriarchy-matriarchy business works for no one.
>Men also control the vast majority of wealth,
So you again focus on the 1%
The truth is that the income of asian women is higher than of white men, according to actual data.
> are most of the politicians
Literally nothing prevents women from being politicians.
Have you heard about the "gender freedom paradox"? Basically research found that the less "misoginistic" a country is, the more women seek stereotipicaly feminine jobs rather than high status ones.
>have most of the social power in the most populated parts of the world
What are you talking about? We are 90% of the homeless and we are less represented in colleges. And what is "social power", when you can literally make a movie shitting on men, but something could never be done about women?
> been the sex of the people who arranged this system where they end up homeless.
lmao
Tell me how women fix any of that, now you are going to just blind misandry.
> Youll notice they also arent raped as much
Around the same amount tbh
> forced to bare children
Men can't have children to begin with? Also you are defending murdering children?
>Are you dense?
Literally all you do is cry about not being half of the 1%, ignore the 99% and then blame men for all of their problems while saying that women are mere victims that don't have clear advantages (when actual data points the opposite).
> Yes men are also oppressed by wealthier men
Ironically, male suicides were lower when society was more patriarcal. That is funny.
Women also were happier, according to data. Look up paradox of female happiness.
>So you again focus on the 1%
No.
>The truth is that the income of asian women is higher than of white men
Ok. And do asian women own more of the world's wealth than men? No.
>Literally nothing prevents women from being politicians.
Please google "obstacles facing female politicians". These days there are fewer obstacles in some areas, those obstacles are mostly social conservatives and financial centers treating elections like a casino. Then in many more areas for a longer period of time the obstacle was legal and violently enforced.
>What are you talking about?
Im talking about how men have more social control in places like the middle east, africa, india, south america. Control over money, over property but also over marriage, travel, speech, expression, dress, pregnancy and even in some areas life and death.
>Tell me how women fix any of that,
They wont? No single class could or would. We all need to work together for social egalitarianism. Thats the point.
>Around the same amount tbh
Dont believe thats true.
>men cant get pregnant
Ftms can but thats besides the point im making about men seeking to control women's reproduction.
>murder babies
I am anti murdering babies, do not murder babies.
>Literally all you do is cry about not being half of the 1%,
No. Actually youve been making the positive assertions here, the initial complaints. Ive taken on a critical role of rebutting them. I havent actually supplied much in terms of alternative systems, just correct info on the current one. I oppose the existence of a capitalist class and favor worker owned cooperatives in a democratic marker based society. Not patriarchy, not matriarchy, no 1%.
>Women also were happier, according to data
Obviously thats compromised data since it comes from a time when women's critical voices were often silenced, medical science did not consider women's health in particular, psychological science was crude at best, women were lobotomized and drugged, etc
Shut the frick up, commie
Facts and logic friend.
Sure, this took 2 seconds to find after googling your post lol
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/01/an-year-old-pleaded-an-abortion-after-she-was-raped-she-was-forced-give-birth/
>We are talking about the average person here.
No, we arent. When we break people down to demographics to analyze the respective relations of those demographics we stop looking individuals and start looking at classes which cannot actually contain the full contours of 1 person anymore than 1 person could represent their entire demographic. Moreover its a question of framing. Are we asking who makes more on average or are we asking who HAS more money on average? Theyre not the same thing. Im asking who has the money. Frankly its not surprising the already wealthier asian minority population would make more in america when most americans are white. Thats just math.
>The actual reality is that less women want to be politicians than men:
Assuming this to true it doesnt necessarily follow that women wish to be politically disenfranchised lmfao, think logically. And again rationally a history of patriarchal rule would make people more familiar with, shocker, patriarchs. The fact that this is a generationally dependent "paradox" proves that its merely inertia in social views thats being moved away from.
>homie, we are talking about the west here.
"The west" is a meaningless phrase. And no i wasnt, i wasnt talking the world. The human species. We dont live in seperate dimensions.
>So stop blaiming a single class for all the world's problems
Great, i wont, dont and havent. Many capitalists are women and female capitalists wont create social equality. The issue is the system not individuals within it or their demographics.
>Its because people usually dont count prison rape
For women as well.
>You want to control a baby's life and death.
We ALL should, so yes i do! And i want them to live. Do not kill babies.
>Sure, this took 2 seconds to find after googling your post lol
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2019/03/01/an-year-old-pleaded-an-abortion-after-she-was-raped-she-was-forced-give-birth/
>Can't show identities but trust us it happened.
Fricking propaganda rags.
Bruh
Ok lmfao lets just get real basic, do you think that maybe under at least *wartime* women were raped and forced to bare the child? Can you admit to that as a minimum? Ive been more than patient.
>No, we arent.
So like I said, you are a dumb motherfricker who only thinks about the 1% and ignores the 99%, because you don't give a damn about them or how that shows that your narrative is false. Just stop to think for some time.
> and start looking at classes which cannot actually contain the full contours of 1 person anymore than 1 person could represent their entire demographic.
You immediatly ignored that, until it was pointed out the advantages and special favor that women have over men or how asian women make more than white men. This is a patethic deflection.
> Im asking who has the money.
The 1%.
And I'm shwing to you that your outdated feminist bulshit that blames men for your woes ignores the fact that 90% of the homeless are men. In the end you don't care about equality, you are just mad that women are not most of the 1%.
>Frankly its not surprising the already wealthier asian minority population would make more in america when most americans are white.
Holy shit, you are dumb, it's what I said about being bad at statistics. >asian women make more than white men. >sure that is easy to explain! asian women make more than white men because they have more money!
moron.
>Assuming this to true
It's a fact
>t doesnt necessarily follow that women wish to be politically disenfranchised
Nobody said that. I said that you blame le patriarchy for women chosing to do different things with their lives.
>And again rationally a history of patriarchal rule would make people
Again, dumb motherfricker - gender freedom paradox - I posted the link, READ. More patriarcal countries have women seeking MORE HIGH POSITION IN JOBS, and less patriarcal countries have women seeking stereotypicaly feminine positions. What you are doing is cope.
> this is a generationally dependent "paradox"
lmao, so you know nothing how that works. You didn't even read about it did you? The study was made across different countries, nt different generations.
>who only thinks about the 1% and ignores the 99%, because you don't give a damn about them
No i think that systems of oppression exist alongside wealth disparity, i am ideologically opposed to both and have said already i dont think society should consist of dominance hierarchies.
>You immediatly ignored that
What makes you think i ignored that?
>The 1%
The 1% doesnt refer to everyone who controls all the money, its a population who controls the most, but not all of it. It is a gradient downward. We do not live in a world of just 1% and 99%, that doesnt even describe the number of capitalists to workers.
>outdated feminism
Im not a feminist
>you are just mad that women are not most of the 1%.
Actually i said already i dont want this, said it right here
>I oppose the existence of a capitalist class and favor worker owned cooperatives in a democratic marker based society. Not patriarchy, not matriarchy, no 1%
>patriarcal countries have women seeking MORE HIGH POSITION IN JOBS, and less patriarcal countries have women seeking stereotypicaly feminine positions.
Lets assume this is true, it does not establish that women desire political disenfranchisement or benefit at all from it.
>You should look up evolutionary anthropology.
I am an anthropologist lol
>Then your complains are non sense, kek.
Really? I think most people agree we shouldnt kill a baby
>Nope. Plenty of conservatives are among the working class.
The wealthy tend to be conservative
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.huffpost.com/entry/new-evidence-that-the-ric_b_7153396/amp
>By the way, most Latinos also hold conservative values with the emphasis on the family and Christian beliefs. They consist of 16% of the US population.
Non sequitor but ok. Theyll assimilate, who cares? My people did the same thing and you white people love spaghetti now.
>Their trauma doesn't give them the right to hurt and hate others
This isnt being contested lol
>No i think that systems of
Anon you keep being wrong. This entire thing started because you went "huuuuh men control the wealth!" and people pointed out you ignore the fact that most homeless are poor and that your bit is not even true.
>its a population who controls the most
And aparently we can't break it down according to you, because the moment where it shows that asian women make more you go "it's a matter of framing!".
>Im not a feminist
you are spouting the same discourse.
>Lets assume this is true
You haven't even checked it up, have you? Even after it being posted?
> it does not establish that women desire
Nobody said that, people said that the lack of political influence is in great part because women straight up prefer to do other things. Its fine to prefer to do other things tbh.
>I am an anthropologist lol
Me too, so I'm surprised with some of the stuff you are posting - aparently you are not familiar with the evolutionary and behavioral side of it, are you?
> I think most people agree we shouldnt kill a baby
Indeed, glad that we agree with the image here
there are some crazy people out there that think that women should be able to kill their unborn children if they wanted.
>The wealthy tend to be conservative
and the working class too lmao
But also, you are cherry picking: https://news.gallup.com/poll/151310/u.s.-republican-not-conservative.aspx
and the left on USA is middle class - not the low class.
>heyll assimilate, who cares? My people did the same thing and you white people love spaghetti now.
No THIS is the non sequitur.
>"The west" is a meaningless phrase.
We are talking about a movie ranting about the west.
>We dont live in seperate dimensions.
Different places have different customs. If the issue that makes you rage, cry and shit yourself happens mostly on Africa - go to Africa to complain with them.
>Great, i wont, dont and havent.
You are disgenious, or just dumb.
>the sex of the people who arranged this system where they end up homeless.
>Many capitalists are women and female capitalists wont create social equality.
Commies won't either tbh. Most of what makes men and women different is straight up biological. You should look up evolutionary anthropology. A lot of interesting things there - it even has answers for why women whine about Barbie being unrealistic to them, while biys loved He-man.
>We ALL should, so yes i do! And i want them to live. Do not kill babies.
Then your complains are non sense, kek.
>No.
lmao, yeah its easy to see how irrational and insane you are, you post this, then immediatly spits: >Ok. And do asian women own more of the world's wealth than men? No.
We are talking about the average person here. And yes, the average asian woman is out there making mroe than the average white man. Even on households where the man makes more, its the women that tend to control the finances.
>Please google "obstacles facing female politicians".
Please google "paradox of gender equality". Literally one of the main aims of every female politician is to use of identity politics to try to convince women that they should get votes just for been women like them.
The actual reality is that less women want to be politicians than men: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender-equality_paradox#:~:text=The%20gender%2Dequality%20paradox%20is,in%20more%20gender%20equal%20countries.
>Im talking about how men have more social control in places like
homie, we are talking about the west here. You run out of things to complain and had to move to fricking Africa. But I'm curious about the research of happiness among those women compared to the average libtard female.
>They wont?
So stop blaiming a single class for all the world's problems, fatboy. You talk about egalitarism but blames everything on men, while being blind about how the world works.
>Dont believe thats true.
Its because people usually dont count prison rape.
>Ftms can but
Not men lmao. How brainwashed are you?
>ontrol women's reproduction
You want to control a baby's life and death.
>No.
You keep doing it homie.
>Ive taken on a critical role of rebutting them
All you have said is "Nu uh"
>I oppose the existence of a capitalist class and favor worker owned cooperatives in a democratic marker based society.
Its moronic for several other reasons. Commies never worked.
>Obviously thats compromised data
"it doesn't count if it goes against my narrative!"
>women were lobotomized and drugged, etc
You are a mental case if you think that was the average life of the average woman on the 70s, and that this is why the research on happiness on pre-70s pointed women beig happier.
Actual modern data shows that conservative women in general are much happier and less mentally unstable than libtard women too.
Research on different countries seems to point out that seem "stereotypical female roles as beneath them" might be good part of the reason why women in more "egalitarian" societies are unhappy if compared to more patriarcal ones.
blah blah blah you will never be raped
>caring about troons
>forced to bear children
Please show proof of women being raped and forced to give birth.
there are laws being passed in like 10 states for this exact scenario
https://www.businessinsider.com/michigan-gop-governor-candidate-said-having-baby-healing-rape-victims-2022-8
https://ohiocapitaljournal.com/2022/07/19/extremist-ohio-statehouse-legislators-created-the-law-forcing-child-rape-victims-to-give-birth/
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/ohios-10-year-old-rape-victim-reveals-republican-abortion-law-conseque-rcna38449
Again fake bullshit stories trying to push an agenda. Damn thing says it can't even prove the story is real but it "serves the issue" that's goofy.
my bad, i'll make sure to post it on a wordpress blog with no sources next time so you'll believe it
>serves the issue
Damn. That's my favourite phrase since "it starts a conversation".
>Because this helps prevent rape and punish rapists and few people lie about being raped
Tell that to all the guys who had their life ruined just because the girl felt like it. Many of those guys kill themselves because of it.
>Getting mad at traumatized women wont make them sleep with you.
They blame all men for the actions of a few. Only because those women go for the obvious buttholes while ignoring the good guys and thinking all men are like these bad boys.
>Because there isnt anything wrong with enjoying your sexuality
There is. Science has proven that the higher the bodycount, the less likely you can properly pair-bond. It's why promiscuous women tend to be shit girlfriends/wives and cheat on their significant others and/or desire open relationships.
>Tell that to all the guys who had their life ruined just because the girl felt like it.
Why do you want me to tell a victim theyre in the minority? Thats just mean. They know that, it doesnt make it better. Who would use their pain in that way? Oh right, people who resent that people report rapists with little fraud.
>They blame all men for the actions of a few.
Trauma is irrational, its a real mindfrick yup.
>There is. Science has proven that the higher the bodycount, the less likely you can properly pair-bond.
Lmfao, oh yeah did "science" say thay? Show me.
>that this is why the research on happiness on pre-70s pointed women beig happier.
Its not why, its part of the context establishing that womens mental health in the eras you point to was in a state of disrepair and conjecture.
>Actual modern data shows that conservative women in general are much happier and less mentally unstable than libtard women too
Conservatives tend to be wealthy, isolated people so im not terribly surprised they live easy lives. Similarly yes it makes sense that people critical of the system are openly unhappy about that system.
Do.you have a single fact to back that up
>Conservatives tend to be wealthy, isolated people so im not terribly surprised they live easy lives
Nope. Plenty of conservatives are among the working class. Many who are just trying to make an honest living in these trying times. By the way, most Latinos also hold conservative values with the emphasis on the family and Christian beliefs. They consist of 16% of the US population.
Majority of leftists are of the upper middle class. The privileged and spoiled lot. They know nothing of the struggles of the working class/common men. They will claim to fight for them but become quick to dehumanize them if they "get out of line".
>Trauma is irrational
Their trauma doesn't give them the right to hurt and hate others. You learn from your mistakes, move on and try to be better. Blaming everyone else only serves to prove how poor the content of your character is.
>Its not why, its part of the context establishing that womens mental health in the eras you point to was in a state of disrepair and conjecture.
Anon, you can keep typing like a fatboy - but you have no idea how the research was done to begin with. You are just assuming that it MUST be false and incorrect, because otherwise your worldview doesn't make people happy - and it has been show that even TODAY women who follow similar mindsets to back then are happier.
>Conservatives tend to be wealthy
Wealthness doesn't have a big impact on happiness according to data, many countries are less wealthy than USA and happier.
By every measurable metric of psychological wellbeing (not financial) western women have become progressively more unhappy as they’ve gained more rights. US white women, who have had the most rights and privileges for the longest, are the most miserable and medicated demographic. (The Paradox of Declining Female Happiness - https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/Intellectual_Life/Stevenson_ParadoxDecliningFemaleHappiness_Dec08.pdf)
>You are just assuming that it MUST be false
Im not assuming its false, im rationally concluding its not accurate information due to the shoddiness of psychological research conducted during that time especially regarding women and the general ignorance and stigmatizing of mental health issues at the time.
>and it has been show that even TODAY women who follow similar mindsets to back then are happier.
I certainly hope you dont think thats what the happy conservative statistic shows because those women still live in and benefit from a socially liberal order and economic rights; they dont live under pre-feminist conditions just because theyre republican.
>Wealthness doesn't have a big impact on happiness according to data, many countries are less wealthy than USA and happier.
Incorrect, dont look at countries look at individuals:
https://penntoday.upenn.edu/news/does-more-money-correlate-greater-happiness-Penn-Princeton-research#:~:text=Reconciling%20previously%20contradictory%20results%2C%20researchers,plateau%20for%20an%20unhappy%20minority.
>women have become progressively more unhappy as they’ve gained more rights
Correlation =/= causation, its not logical to single out womens rights from the miasma of wealth inequality, climate collapse, christian fascism and general loneliness americans deal with today. To actually conclude what youre concluding youd need women to say theyre unhappy because they have rights, do they say that? No. Obviously not.
>Im not assuming its false
lmao, then says "im rationally concluding its not accurate information"
The truth is that you don't even know how the data was aquired. The truth is that you simply can't BELIEVE OR CONCEIVE that the data is correct, even tho it shows up in several studies.
>I certainly hope you dont think thats what the happy conservative statistic shows
Again, the results are similar outside of USA too. You are having a hard time explaining how every metric possible showing that conservative women being happier no matter the place or time period is somehow wrong.
>dont look at countries look at individuals:
moronic metric - but the truth is that you fell for click bait. The actual statistics point towards "not being in debt" makes one happier, not "being rich". A rich person in debt is pretty unhappy. Funny enough, hunter gatherers tend to have happiness levels pretty high, often on par with very wealthy people.
>Correlation =/= causation
There are several good arguments for the causation.
> wealth inequality, climate collapse, christian fascism
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
homie, did you really say that "christian fascism" is making women unhappy, when the christian conservative women are the happiest demographic?
Other funny data is how women prefer conservative men.
>studies actually point to wealth being the major factor
Good luck if you're a poorgay conservative.
>climate collapse, christian fascism
Yeah, your ideology gaslight common women to be unhappy with bulshit stuff like that rather than dealing with real problems.
Not that climate change isn't real, but irrationaly freaking out over stuff that isn't dependent of your actions and hardly would affect you directly based on your actions is a very libtard thing. They also tend to be really stupid into thinking that it will lead to human extinction, its pretty surreal seeing what some of you peple believe.
>Do.you have a single fact to back that up
https://extra.globo.com/noticias/rio/nas-varas-de-familia-da-capital-falsas-denuncias-de-abuso-sexual-podem-chegar-80-dos-registros-5035713.html
It's obviously in portuguese.
I thought that was curious so i decided to look up context. I wasnt surprised by what i found. Its illegal to get an abortion in brazil unless you were raped.
This isnt evidence of malicious women hating men, its an example of patriarchal conditions putting women in a vulnerable position that encourages them to lie AND its an example of patriarchy hurting men
So you have no evidence that its the reason, but you are going to interpret on the way that aids your agenda - even tho in the majority f the cases there is no fricking abortion involved.
Ignoring that most other countries have it go from 10 to 50% too.
>So you have no evidence that its the reason
Dont i? Are you claiming its illogical to conclude brazils abnormally high false rape claims might be related to its restricting abortion access to those with rape claims? How is that an illogical conclusion when we can find testimonials of women saying that is what they did just by googling around lightly?
http://america.aljazeera.com/features/2014/5/brazil-s-abortionnightmare.html
>huuuuh men control the wealth!" and people pointed out you ignore the fact that most homeless are poor and that your bit is not even true.
I dont ignore that. I said the people who control the most wealth are men. Do you agree or disagree with that?
>aparently we can't break it down according to you, because the moment where it shows that asian women make more you go
We can break it down. Lets break it down.
https://ourworldindata.org/economic-inequality-by-gender/#in-most-countries-there-is-a-substantial-gender-pay-gap
https://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2022/in-full/2-6-gender-gaps-in-wealth-accumulation/
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnbc.com/amp/2020/01/17/global-wealth-inequality-is-founded-on-sexism-oxfam-international.html
Says here quite plainly that those who have the most wealth are men, not women, but men. Seems worldwide they have 50% more wealth than women. Huh.
You accidentally linked something that says this:
>One-third of the nation's "1%" identify themselves as Republicans, 41% as independents, and 26% as Democrats. This is a mirror image of the "99%," a third of whom are Democrats, with 39% independents and a quarter Republicans.
Theoretically, it's legal if it's a risk to the mother, but of course the extremists were against all those cases as well.
> Na maioria dos casos, a mãe está recém-separada e denuncia o pai para restringir as visitas — conta Glícia, responsável por entrevistar as senpaiílias e as crianças para tentar descobrir a verdade.
"In most of the cases the mother is recently divorced and denounces the father to restrict visiting rights - tells Glicia, responsible for interviewing the families and children to try to discover the truth."
Damn, the feminist b***h was wrong again.
>Pay gap
Lmao
>having to include fricking Africa for his argument to have any weight
>ignoring that most women avoid high paying positions
>your retort is going to be crying that it happens due to sexism- while forgeting the gender equality paradox that shows that this is more common the more the country is egalitarian
>having to include fricking Africa for his argument to have any weight
Why would we not include Africa, just so youd look less wrong?
>ignoring that most women avoid high paying positions
Is that because they want to be paid less and have less political power?
>that this is more common the more the country is egalitarian
Thats fine if its true, the point is making sure we all get a choice. If its true most women prefer these traditional roles then there isnt any harm in allowing the minority of women to eschew them freely and teaching all women to be whatever they want to be.
Uh-huh. Ok thats not really evidence so much as an assumption but it does bring me to my other point, whats your proposed alternate system for handling rape investigations?
>In some cases 32% of women ADMIT making shit up
Really?! 32% of rape accusations are false? Share that source!
>AND most cases of abusive women have them claiming that they will falsely acuse the dude as a threat.
No one is defending abusive people gaslighting their victims. If a victim comes forward, we should listen to them and investigate. Not immediately form conjecture.
>Really?! 32% of rape accusations are false?
A study from 1988 to 1997 found 68 reports of forcible rape, of which in 22 cases (32%) the complainants admitted that their reports were false. Most of these false reports served as an alibi.
Source: Turvey, Brent E. (2013). Forensic Victimology: Examining Violent Crime Victims in Investigative and Legal Contexts.
According to Hines and Douglas (2017), 73% of men who've experienced partner-initiated violence reported that their partner threatened to make false accusations. This is compared to 3% for men in the general population.
>and few people lie about being raped.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Here on Brazil, false cases like that make up 80% of all cases.
Most other countries seem to go from 10 to 50%
You must be from Argentina or Spain, that's like saying false accusation of a robbery helps to prevent them and punishes robbers; you're automatically assuming that those men are future sex offenders.
Now tell me, why does the law not work in same-sex cases?
What im saying is that given how rare it is that anyone lies about being raped, let alone for malicious reasons and not just for abortion access, it makes sense to trust those who come forward enough to investigate their claims. How else would we handle rape?
>The actual statistics point towards "not being in debt" makes one happier, not "being rich". A rich person in debt is pretty unhappy.
And who tends to be in debt more, rich or working men?
>You are having a hard time explaining how every metric possible showing that conservative women being happier no matter the place or time period is somehow wrong.
I dont actually. In the developed world conservatives tend to be wealthy and insulated from harm, of course theyre happy. In less developed parts of the world and in history women's mental health is not studied seriously, mental health is stigmatized and women are silenced violently for criticizing the system.
Whats the evidence given for that conclusion?
>Whats the evidence given for that conclusion?
Literal investigation. You know, because when people inform the Police, they investigate.
>What im saying is that given how rare it is that anyone lies about being raped, let alone for malicious reasons
You literally didn't prove it, and many anons have pointed out data that contradicts it. In some cases 32% of women ADMIT making shit up AND most cases of abusive women have them claiming that they will falsely acuse the dude as a threat.
You literally bring nothing, and you are totally blind to what men actually go throuth.
That anon is honestly a goddamn bad person. The moment something shows that his ideology is wrong, he assumes literally ASSUMES that its because the place doesn't have it "enough" and tries to do mental malabarism.
>The moment something shows that his ideology
Im genuinely confidant you couldnt reconstruct my beliefs in good faith if asked.
Except we live in a extremely gynocentric culture where almost everything is geared towards women.
Let's use a very fun example; environmentalism. We have thousands of activists crying we need to stop meat consumption but very few of them arguing for yhe abolishment of make up and pharmaceuticals they use like birth control which are running ramshackle on the water habitats of the world.
I'd argue meat consumption is unisex
Holy shit a well thought out post on Cinemaphile I thought those were a myth
Thank you for showing that there are still people, who are not idiots.
It's not divisive, you're just a screeching butthole nobody likes.
Sounds like we got a Ken here. You don't get to have opinions.
It grossed 340 million usd moron
The movies made for men and boy only were still infiltrated by feminism.
Girls don't play with dolls anymore.
What was wrong with it?
Don't be trans and homophobic anon.
Just because OP is a homosexual, doesn't mean you have to be one, too.
Have you seen the state of the thread anon? Now I've been here for the life in the dreamhouse threads. Cinemaphile is more than capable of having multiple threads for thousands of posts about Barbie, without anon going, I"m not even sure what to call it, as it's not even the normal pol vs leftypol garbage.
Uh anon, check OP again.
SHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
LOL. There's at least 5 thousand words of non stop political shitposting, and I'm the one you shush? You're not trolling me are you?
look at the picture he posted
And yet the men were the best part of the entire movie, funny how that works out, huh?
>Kens wanted to be valued and actually have a say in the world.
>That's treated as a negative thing to the point where they have to rise up.
>Kens are defeated and everything goes back to Barbie World.
>Ends with Barbie getting a vegana installed or something.
man that would suck if something like that happened in the real world
You're supposed to empathise with Ken dumbass. They're the women of the barbie world.
So it's okay them living under Barbie dictatorship?
if you think it's not okay then congratulations on becoming a feminist
Go to bed Greta, your doublethink bullshit won't work on anyone here
this is literally the opposite of doublethink moron
do you think doublethink is just thinking the same thing twice?
the movie itself doesn't think it's okay. that's why it ends with kens being second class citizens still.
No. Just like it's not okay in the real world. Why is Cinemaphile so bad at this
Women aren't second class citizens. Especially white women.
Having to live with a vegana is a curse on any sexless being
If it's made for just women, why is the story all about the patriarchy being bad? Aren't they just preaching to the choir?
They like that kinda shit. Also they have to Teach young girls to hate men like they do.
Too bad they didn't make an actual good movie. Barbie: Life in the Dreamhouse is a better Barbie show you can watch over it.
It honestly is. When Ken said "I'm... Kenough." I felt that.
Why can’t we have movies for men anymore? Nothing is for men.
Oppenheimer is right there
>Nothing is for men.
there is a movie about a dude destroying child traffic or something right now homosexual
you feel so threatened by barbie its funny
After watching the new barbie movie, I have become a Barbie Man.
>There's only one Allah
MashAllah brother
>All of NSYNC
I'm a Barbie Man, with a Barbie Plan.
And that plan is to Barbie as much as I can.
hot
HOUTOU NO KEN
I need a HOKUTO NO BARBIE DOLL. NOW.
Alrright. I havent' seen the movie, so I have no clue if this is some LULZ shit, or some dumbfrick hollywood feminist shit. Can we at least TRY to keep this thread from spiraling to LULZ or pol, and stay focused on the movie?
is obviously the second
Basically the TLDR is that the actual message of the movie is about figuring out what you want out of life and not letting yourself be defined by someone else. Barbie learns that a perfect plastic life can never be as beautiful as a well lived normal life and Ken starts a journey of self-discovery where he figures out who he is without being defined by Barbie's existence. It's a great movie when anons the world over aren't bleeting in your ear about how it's actually bad.
Cept that isn’t the focus of the film. Had they then left Barbie land behind after finding themselves then maybe you'd be close.
Ken's primary driving force for most of the movie is trying to have Barbie return his affections, even the Kendom was for her as much as it was for him. Barbie starts the movie completely oblivious as to why Ken would even want to stay the night with her, and ends the movie realizing that while she doesn't love him back, this whole situation was in part her fault for being oblivious to his feelings, not even considering where the hell the Kens sleep. Barbie leaves Barbieland behind to become human, Ken stays behind to find himself, no longer having a Barbie to be an accessory to.
TOBASE KEN! TOBASE KEN!
YOOOZORA NIIIIIII
he did nothing wrong
>Going on an autistic tirade over a Mattel toy commercial
Is Barbie the new MLP?
If anything, it was the original one
But do you still want to play with little girl dolls like a real man, OP?
ITT alt-right morons
Media Literacy makes you a troony now?
Media literacy, historical awareness, kinky sex, female friends, empathy and logic all make you a woke troony sjw. Real men are bitter and too hysterically offended to communicate clearly or check the facts or admit to an error; thats cuck shit. Men used to hunt t rex to feed their Clans.
>logic
Now we know you're not honest
Pretending it's akshully le 4D chess anti-woke makes you an illiterate homosexualard, like
Woke is meaningless, especially if you think it can be used to describe both advocating for equality and inequality. It isnt woke or anti woke.
Instead of using a thought cancelling buzzword to prevent wrongthink why dont you try to explain why you think the Barbie movie doesnt convey a message of equality and individuality?
Woke isn’t a real word, it was made up by seething alt-righters who hate progress, women, and oppressed people.
Oh absolutely its used to just whine about anything in particular, theyre spiteful towards the Enlightenment itself really.
100%
It was actually invented by black people, so you're being pretty racist right now.
So which one it is?
Straight men deserve to be neutered.
No, but you'd be a troony even if you had any.
A movie where Barbie calls out all the "I'm just joking you're too sensitive" people? I can dig it.
Wasn't Barbie based on a sex doll?
It is a sex doll but marketed towards children and itc remains as sexual token today. Its hilarious no one cares.
"Sex doll" she was essentially just an early Barbie, same size and everything, she had a tie in comic that was the sexy part. But it was popular amongst kids too. Mattel ended up buying the whole brand to scrub it from existence.
It originally was a joke gift tona friendo or a co-worker, the doll was based on a cómic strip character, similar to Jucika; little girls played with it and the company took notice of those and went for It. It was a already succes when Mattel got the rights
is it because the movie was so good, that you are satisfied with barbie content?
Got more of that Millicent bible anon?
Reminder that you are Kenough
For some reason I feel like I'd be tempted to buy that hoodie if it existed.
I just bought my husband a shirt of it from a secondhand site, because frick Mattel they ain't getting my money for their cheap trash marked at $60 like the entire current Monster High doll line
It does, and it's already sold out atm.
I didnt watch the movie but I enjoyed the old movies as kid
Will I enjoy it?
Probably not, it's more meta
Can anyone who actually saw this tell me if somebody who actually likes Barbie or is it all cynical and shit
*actually likes Barbie would like it
It is 100% drenched in barbie aesthetics and nods to barbie's history as a product including tongue in cheek references to failed product lines.
A 12 year old girl goes on a rant to barbie calling her a fascist and is shown in the right because barbie runs off crying in agreement
Is that really how you took it
Yes. That emotionally damaged little girl who made an innocent woman she later befriends cry is definitely shown to be in the right when she makes her cry. For sure. And she's extra shown to be right about Barbie being a fascist when she bonds with her mother and Barbie land and wears progressively pinker and more Barbie like clothing. Youre so right and good at watching movies.
Why is everyone a fascist now? What does that even mean anymore?
It loves Barbie but still knows how to tease and poke fun at Barbie, you see some fun nods to controversial dolls like Earring Magic Ken, Sugar Daddy Ken and Growing Up Skipper
>Sugar Daddy Ken
Is that a thing? Neat
>Wokest movie of the year. Probably gonna make near a billion.
Chuds lose again. Who would have thought? You fricks ever get tired of being on the wrong side of history?
wtf, what happened to go woke go broke chudbros?????
Marketing pretty much hides all of it tho. People are also unironically sid9ng with Ken en masse
>People are also unironically sid9ng with Ken en masse
Cool, thats the point. Being a man under matriarchy would suck the same as being a woman under patriarchy. It would erase your sense of self and make you emotionally and materially dependent on another person who is also rendered incapable of ever appreciating the fully realize, unencumbered you since you never got to blossom. Even if you both really cared for each other if one of you was oppressor and the other oppressed neither of you would be happy. Ken is right that men shouldnt be 2nd class citizens, Barbie is right that women shouldnt be 2nd class citizens and everyone should just be their own individual self. Thats Kenough for anyone. They should agree with Ken!
Men SHOULD be 2nd class, though. I’m sick of the fricking patriarchy. Look at what happens when women try and call out bad men when they’re famous ffs
Calling out famous bad men is your metric for equality? Show me where Hollywood touched you or would that be pilpul in itself? Stockholders kept from their profits based on biological born sex. You're not kept from your inheritance either. This is a well stocked performative cabinet though.
anon why are you fighting with another chud having a cry about people correctly identifying him
> people correctly identifying him
WTF? I’m a woman lmfao try again
Agreed
Dude, you’re trying too hard. You’ll get more (you)’s if you use a bit more subtlety.
I just hate men (not all of them, mostly straight men) I’ve got nothing to hide.
Except Barbie's "real world" is a weird af strawman.
It's exaggerated for effect.
And therefore not the Real World just an odd Feminist screed
>what is comedy
>what is satire
Cept it doesn't play it like that.
Like that Velma or She-Hulk. You can't disguise shit writing by declaring "Hah it was supposed to be meta satire"
Anon, this is a movie with Will Ferrel as CEO of Mattel giving a speech to Barbie about how women are the true force that drives their company that somehow ends in "I have a israeli friend!". So either it's all a joke or you have to call this movie secretly based by spinning a web about how feminism is a psy-op created by the israelites and this movie brings that fact to light. Which way, Western Man
>Will Ferrel as CEO of Mattel giving a speech to Barbie about how women are the true force that drives their company that somehow ends in "I have a israeli friend
>checks who the current CEO is out of curiosity
And here i though
>/misc/ is always right
meant they were right-wing
It obviously does, like painfully so. Have you seen the movie? Because I have a hard time understanding how anyone could think the exaggerated sexism was not supposed to be satirical. It's played up so hard.
Women have a hard time with statistics and escale. Like for real, I'm not going on a misoginistic rant or anything, its actual data.
I knew Cinemaphile was moronic but holy shit. If you can't tell that it's played up your literacy skills are in the fricking gutter.
Have you seen Velma or She-Hulk? They do the same shit. And then claim it to be nuanced satire. One of the problems is the film leans so hard into shit negatively when it's concept is based around a fricking plastic doll. And it has absolutely no fun with it. Satire is a form of comedy. This film isn't fricking funny.
So....sort of in the same way b***h planet or Maneaters does it? Maneaters available in the SOP series right now.
Not really. If anything, it is far more innocent and wholesome than the actual real world.
>It would erase your sense of self and make you emotionally and materially dependent on another person who is also rendered incapable of ever appreciating the fully realize, unencumbered you since you never got to blossom.
I'm like 90% this is a false flag post. Even real feminists aren't this moronic.
>Women have it farrrrrr worse than men
The frick they do.
>Look at what happens when women try to show a famous man’s true fricking colors, they get attacked.
Yeah, men never get attacked for anything.
It'll probably top off at around 500-600 million.
I don't think it's as bad as some people think, but it is pretty bland and the marketing was pretty misleading. I expect a big drop-off next weekend after word if mouth gets out that's it's not what the trailers promised and will probably be boring for kids.
I know someone who watched the trailer was 100 percent hype about going to it, with a vanload of people.
Saw a youtube short with what looked like 90 seconds of political ranting. Hype deflated. Will still probably go.
I'm not sure if the clip was real, or how much of the movie is about it, but Barbie, with plot points about modern gender politics is absolutely NOT what she wanted.
I havent decided if I"m in on this trip. Might wait for a rip, or until the Cinemaphile is love people discuss the movie instead of the trolls and lunatics we've got right this second.
it's still a fun movie but there's one or two heavy handed speeches that drag it down.
I guess were going to see those heavy handed speeches posted NON STOP here for the next decade.
That doesn't sound like it would be fun for the kids who get barbies at all.
It's not a movie for kids at all really. It's not your stereotypical toy selling movie like say Batman and Robin. Even Batman Returns which was darker still tried to sell toys and was kid appropriate-ish. Barbie is more like The Batman or Dark Knight on the maturity scale.
They're clearly targeting teens at the youngest, women who grew up with Barbie at the oldest.
>Barbie is more like The Batman or Dark Knight on the maturity scale.
Nihga what? Does Raquelle sew a bomb inside a guy's stomach?
No but the make a couple sex and genital jokes
I would TOTALLY watch that episode of life in the dream house, with Surgeon barbie to the rescue!
I'm not familiar with that video, but it's important for strong arguments and an accurate view of others to hear from people you disagree with.
Q: Have you seen it?
If I wanted to hear smart conservative arguments I wouldn't turn to Ben Shapiro lol.
It's not gory or anything. It just has more adult themes and Barbie says shit like vegana and penis so it's not a movie for little little kids. You could take your tween kids if you wanted to. But idk if it's going to engage them as much.
Is it true they made Ken based and redpilled?
yes
Is the barbie movie even worth watching?
it's fun enough
Yeah, I enjoyed it more than I thought I would. Ryan Gosling was fantastic.
solid 8/10.
Straight men are such babies. The patriarchy deserves to be mocked. Women have it farrrrrr worse than men (Look at what happens when women try to show a famous man’s true fricking colors, they get attacked. I don’t have to name names.) , it was a breath of fresh air. I’m glad Cinemaphile is tearing you a new butthole. Feminism is saving media, cry while Cinemaphile dances in pink sparkles.
Take off that name, you can't be Lauren Faust. She's alright occasionally.
what movies have you lads watched this year (both animated AND live-action)?
Where would you rank Barbie within said list?
*Walks up to mic*
*Sings while everyone on Cinemaphile dances in cute pink outfits*
Call out straight men
They will try
Cinemaphile one ups them
And they cry
Mad they had it good
For so long
But feminism is so strong
Cinemaphile will stand
Hand in hand
Accepting all throughout the land
While Cinemaphile sings
While they dance
Straight men cry
Shit their pants
Women and others around take the bat
Swing and win
Watching as our time to shine begins
Cinemaphile celebrates
Cinemaphile has cake
While straight men wallow in hate
Male privilege forced in their face
While Cinemaphile wears cute pink lace
Listen to my song
Cinemaphile stays strong
This is what we wanted for so long
So does the movie have Barbie Girl in it or were they too cheap to pay for it?
a remix of it is the credits song
i dont think mattel themselves like the original song so they opted for a remixed version instead
Barbie Girl is honestly a more effective critique of Barbie and consumerism in general than the movie tbh
I was just talking about how a good sequel would be about collector Barbies being b***hes who like being in boxes who insult modern Playline Barbies for being so cheap, but that would be too much for Mattel to admit.
Aqua's Barbie Girl fits better in a movie about that than this one that was just about ffeminismand distracted most of the audience will well-landed jokes and references.
Are people really taking the bait from some gay who calls himself Cinemaphile‘s cool feminist wine aunt?
this is a thread where people are seriously calling a barbie movie "anti-men propaganda" of fricking course people are taking the most obvious bait
What has been Barbie's appeal?
Is it inherited nostalgia that keeps it going?
Have we reached the stage where we pretend and gaslight that the barbie cartoons were some high art?
Life in the Dreamhouse has a sizable Cinemaphile following anon.
/toy/ knows this shit better than me. But it's sex appeal, childhood, and work. Barbie is sexy, fashionable, hard working, talented, and rich. She's the social center of her friend group.
The bigger problem is that they are using it incorrectly.
ok im not reading all this shit but do you think the Ken 10 dance scene with the white sparkles was kind of homoerotic or what???
He is no longer literally me.
He is, under the direction of the libfem director he had to do it, pour one out for the homies forced to so unspeakable things for their jobs
>Poor Ryan Gosling was forced to be in this awful movie!
No we're talking about the scene being actung like troon is pretty.
Similar to that one spammer who posts about Arnold Schwarzenegger and Jaime Lee Curtis being unsexy, male actors who are good at acting have to act like they think these people are sexy
yeah moron is called acting
has nothing to do with the troony. Do you think Holland enjoyed the BLACKED scene?
>Do you think Holland enjoyed the BLACKED scene?
yes
Wait that Barbie is a man?
>Barbies are generally happier under Ken rule
>Main characters can only return things to normal by kidnapping and brainwashing them into thinking that they're miserable
>this is portrayed as justified and heroic
There are so many unintentional refpills about feminism in this movie
anon they were literally explicitly brainwashed the opposite way
They were literally brainwashed in the first place by the Ken's
Patriarchy is one hell of a drug.
They never showed how they were "brainwashed" by the Kens.
Post brainwashing the Barbies were just too ashamed to admit that once Kens displayed masculine energy they felt their featurless plastic panties twinge and let it happen.
Yeah it was pretty obvious the girls were just really turned on by pretending to be bimbos, and since all the girls were playing along, they ran with it. They blamed "brainwashing" after the fact to save face with stereotypical Barbie who clearly wasn't into men.
>women-led society
>men are ignored but generally allowed to do their own thing
>men-led society
>women are slaves
>barbie should pander to me! - said thel chud
lol lmao even
go watch saving private pedo instead
The biggest deterent to me watching the Barbie movie is that I can't figure out what it's about. All of the reviews are vague as frick and so are the trailers. I'm not keen on wasting 20 bucks to go see something that might be crap.
Barbie (the main one) becomes depressed and ugly because the person playing with her in the real world is depressed so she and Ken go into the real world to find her and fix her life, while in the real world Ken discovers that men rule the real world and goes back to Barbieland to rule it. There's also some lectures about feminism but all of the main cast is funny enough for it to not be too annoying
Oh so they are just toys. I was wondering if they were going to commit.
I still want my live action Barbie and the Rockers movie.
>movie with Margot Robbie and Ryan Gosling singing, dancing, space traveling and time traveling
Everyone should want this.
That would have been lit.
Missed opportunity by Mattel to piss on Jem a second time to not put one into production and release the day the Jem movie came out years ago
>Barbie and the Rockers, a better Jem movie than the Jem movie.
The line that everyone would be saying about it.
I like the cut of your jib, but if wey're going to dream, I want to dream BiGGER.
Imagine, a Cinemaphile music festival with all the bands in this genre, and their neighbors. Feat:
Barbie and the Rockers.
Jem and the Holograms
The MissFits.
Josie and the Pussycats.
Puffy and Amayumi
The Hex Girls.
The Chippettes
Kidd Video
Also guesting
The Jackson 5
The partrigte famly.
The Chipmunks.
Wierd Al.
Powerline.
Ras and the League of Shadows.
Kid Video
The Archies
must defend wahmen at all costs
>seething about barbie to no end
/misc/ and tumblr are literally step brothers at this point
I often don't feel like I'm kenough
I thought the brunette in the back was holding a severed leg for a second.
>Flat feet
Is Dreamhouse Adventures worth watching?
Not as fun as Life in the Dreamhouse if I recall, but had its moments. The Skitter movie earlier this year was fun.
Just finished the camrip. It was honestly just a really boring movie. Felt like an overly-long Funny or Die skit from 2007 or something but written by someone seething about Hillary losing the election
>this entire thread
dont give a dam about barbie but i am glad is making chuds seethe
Oppenheimer was better but both are no more than a 7 at best
What the frick was everyone expecting? This movie sounds exactly like the product I assumed it was going to be.
saw a chud review on youtube that wanted an inoffensive musical movie by Greta lol
I was HOPING for a live action Life in the Dreamhouse, or maybe the Barbie equivalent of the live action movie Elf. Expecting something souless, low effort and corporate like Toy Story Barbie.
I wasn't expecting them to actually try for social commentary. Not commenting on whether it was a good idea, a good message, or well executed.
Something like say, the Rocky and Bullwinkle movie would have been fun, and thus cool.
Do kengays really
Man, the femoid is getting obliterated here.
I didn’t like the new Barbie movie.
That's okay
The ending was pretty meh, the kens were the best part
It's line Velma. Best part is Fred when though he's the punching bag for the writers.
It's funnier in Velma since you know she's just still seething that white men don't want to frick her.
Life in the Dreamhouse is the only barbie media worth watching.
I think the princess movies are fun too, and the fairytopia movies
Those done by Mainframe are quality.
The Starlight movie did what the NuStar Wars movies wanted, but without being absolute shit.
Cinemaphile fooling me into watching those short. They were barely okay.
>watching anything barbie related that isn't life in the dreamhouse
You brought this on yourself.
>ITT: Cinemaphile getting filtered by fricking BARBIE of all things
Amazing
why don't you femcels and incels just make out with each other already? this is Cinemaphile and yet you're discussing politics /misc/ of a live action movie Cinemaphile based on a barbie doll /toy/. get a grip.
The writing was on-the-nose and even the jokes were a little forced.
I did laugh at "N'Sync? All Allan. Yeah, even him." joke
>once they figure out how to build that wall sideways and not just up, nobody is getting in or out
The jokes were great, it was the message at the end that was cringe
I dont hate the message but the way we got there was just a mess
why did a barbie movie need any political subtext?
It didn't, much like most current media.
Why not? Better than generic trash
Sorry it hurt the chuds feefees
Women don't know what they want
>What are the implications?
That Margot's 'fit wasn't effay, obviously.
Compliment man on appearance:
>Thanks bro.
Compliment woman on appearance (while not being handsome and rich):
>Ew, creep! I'm calling the police!
>wanted new Barbie animated series badly
Nobody says this, marketer.
Some of us liked Life in the Dreamhouse and were disappointed by the youtube series, and jealous of Monster High
then just watch monster high I mean they're both mattel
It isn't the same
The movie was okay, but it didn't feel like a Barbie movie aside from branding and some nostalgia bait. It felt like it voukd have been a generic fictional doll made-up to parody Barbie and been the same thing. I agree with the general message, but I thought it was a little clumsy how they handled it and the human characters (especially the kid) were annoying.
It's very much trying to be an Oscar bait type film dressed up as a Barbie movie. I could see hardcore fans maybe not liking it for that but I have no idea. People liked Tod Philips Joker despite it being a reskinned Taxi Driver meets King of Comedy after all.
OP is a homosexual who's just repeating everything Ben Shapiro said about the movie to get (you)s
Ben Shapiro is like the conservative Moviebob. Everything he says is terrible, regardless if you agree with it or not
Pretty based of Ben for destroying Margot for 43 minutes.
But who wouldn't?
why does anyone listen to this nasally clown
>seething over fricking barbie
The frick is wrong with you people
Look at where we are
The Barbie animated series was way better than it had any right to be.
Shame it seems the movie hasn't captured the same magic.
>barbieland is the inverse of the real world
>women create everything meaningful in society and keep the lights on
>men are victim complex idiots that ruin everything if they are in power
what did they mean by this
Bimbo Barbies seeing a huge three and a half inch peen.
Twitter is starting to hate Gosling now.
Ken was arguably the central character. He starts out as the underdog, goes on a journey of self-discovery, and ultimately learns a relatable lesson about being true to himself and not letting others define his identity. Barbie just whines and acts passively until Ugly Betty gives her a speech about feminism.
He was the best part of the movie. No disrespect to Margot Robbie who was also great, and the rest of the cast, but the theatre I was in cracked up every time he was on screen.
Who else am I supposed to cheer for? The troony? The mutt kid? Fat Barbie?
There was no transgender in the movie. Shut up.
There was. The ugly redhead "barbie".
Yeah there was.
>women are turning on gossling
he's ours now boys