Was any of it real?
Was Sam the dog killer?
was he just wandering around in a schizoid delusion meanwhile he was really out killing dogs?
Was any of it real? Was Sam the dog killer?
Was any of it real?
Was Sam the dog killer?
was he just wandering around in a schizoid delusion meanwhile he was really out killing dogs?
> was he just wandering around in a schizoid delusion meanwhile he was really out killing dogs?
That’s what I think. Also the Owl Lady was symbolism for suicide. It got the other schizo and Garfield almost succumbed to it when he was at his lowest point and she visited
There were a lot of butts in this film.... a very butt-centric film
but what do the butts MEAN
There were a lot of breasts too
Can you imagine if they had Sydney Sweeney do the stripping scene instead of the chick in your pic
Is LA really like this?
I had a friend from Silver Lake and she said guys like Garfield that look like him and don’t have jobs are a dime a dozen
but how do they live
I want to live that way
plz don't say rich parents, I don't have those
sorry anon. it's expensive as frick to live out there
This movie is set in 2011, it was the millennial hipster era and it’s not like that anymore
They make it look super comfy but Andrew Garfield was one missed rent payment away from ending up homeless, being a homeless schizophrenic is not a good way to live and apparently there’s a lot of them in L.A
Schizoid is not an abbreviation for schizophrenic, but an entirely different thing that doesn't make sense in this context. And in fact, you could just say schizo.
schizoid: [adjective] characterized by, resulting from, tending toward, or suggestive of schizophrenia.
don't know what kind of an ESL dictionary you are quoting, but that's wrong
you'd do well to learn the difference between the two, considering that half this website's userbase is schizoid subhumans, while the other half is autistic, with schizos being extremely rare
>Your art, your writing, your culture... is the shell of other men's ambitions - ambitions beyond what you will ever understand.
What does this actually mean? Am I a brainlet or is this a largely incorrect and possibly meaningless statement?
>What does this actually mean?
It means you everything you consume and derive meaning from is ultimately shallow interpretations of surface level ideals and that at their core lies hidden and deep messages that are for some other purpose, whether it be occult ritual worship or subliminal brainwashing to affect cultural norms; all of which is directed by people in higher positions of power then yourself.
Stick around long enough in /x/ and you'll maybe see more detailed sources of what I mean from the more coherent types lurking in there.
But in the movie this man wrote Smells Like Teen Spirit and other hit songs. Is he implying that it was not Cobain who actually wrote it, but essentially a roundtable meeting of Rothschilds and Illuminati lizard people? The idea sounds cool, but I don't see any connection to reality.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Max_Martin
https://daily.jstor.org/was-modern-art-really-a-cia-psy-op/
Why are anglos so evil?
He’s saying that the shit you value, that defined your life, is deliberately designed that way and produced quite literally as casually by people at that level as the human body produces shit. You see this shit in finance a lot where guys put away months that equal take homes more than entire households will make in a lifetime and those guys can still be disappointed because it wasn’t 25% higher.
Art isn't made for you.
>he implying that it was not Cobain who actually wrote it, but essentially a roundtable meeting of Rothschilds and Illuminati lizard people? The idea sounds cool, but I don't see any connection to reality.
That is the implication, and within the film itself that is clearly hyperbolic fantasy. But I wouldn't doubt there is some truth in that some grass-root startups in entertainment were actually manufactured by a corporate type organization. Specifically israelites, Freemasons, Jesuits, Archons, Lizard People or pixies if you want to fingerpoint /misc/ and /x/ style
oop meant for
it's that a, what
said, and b, that the 'secret hidden conspiracies' of the world in the motivations behind why and what people do are obviously real but they're also obviously not entirely different from your world, if someone makes an amazing song that changes the world, they still only did it for the same reasons you do anything, and the point is to not only bring the great creators of the world down a notch but to then bring you up on so you're even, and the songwriter finds it hysterical that this is coming as a serious shock to Garfield, and they duke it out and prove what the view of things will persist in being, and the guy who gets it obviously gets his head smashed in by the guy who doesn't, because its better that way cause the songwriter is a creep, you know, like me and you, and Garfield still has ideals despite and in spite of his knowledge, you know, like me and you
Blame the anons that live in LA
>Was Sam the dog killer?
Probably not. Midwits automatically think Sam's the dog killer. There's really no hard answers in the film.
the high iq take is to take everything for this movie at face value. there is no symbolism, only reality
Andrew Garfield.
Yes it was real.
No, Sam wasn't the dog killer. The dog killer was hysteria. The dogs were just being killed by coyotes.
Balloon girl = blood libel https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_of_Trent
Those questions are supposed to take a back seat to the comfort of the film itself. Keep them in mind, watch it, but remember the answers aren’t important.
everything in the movie was real