Harry is unironically a Chad though >always wins >has friends everywhere >multiple girls on his dick >the principal, the janny and some teachers always have his back >"The Boy Who Lived"
How can PureCucks even compete?
>How can PureCucks even compete?
Harry is a pureblood, both of his parents are wizards. Haven't watched Harry Potter in years but I'm fairly sure that even if one wizard parent is a mudblood then their children are still considered purebloods
>Marries a 3/10 bong because he has mommy issues instead of staying the most hunted bachelor in the wizarding world
The next movie should be called "Harry Potter and his poor life choices"
Harry Potter is a power fantasy for children. Malfoy is a stand in for the bullies that kids want to BTFO. But yes, from a story telling point of view, Draco seemed like a waste; especially in Deathly Hallows.
he was just an incel with bad parenting. I've never felt that he was supposed to be a villain past the second movie. He felt more like a conflicted kid than anything else
meh, draco was the vegeta of harry potter >starts off pure evil >aristocratic >has an edge over the protagonist due to his heritage >never has a clear victory against the protagonist (the first vegeta/goku fight is debatable) >has a redemption arc realizing he prefers being good
he's just annoying in Madam Malkin's acting like any weird rich kid trying to impress some they jsut met
the same scene of him offering friendship to Harry on the train is in the books too
What, if I was going to call debatable it would be the second Vegeta/Goku fight, first one was a clear victory for Vegeta
It is a pretty decent comparison though
I said it was debatable because vegeta ultimately lost, but we can consider it a victory
the second fight was a cheap shot when they weren't even fighting, absolutely doesn't count
>never has a clear victory against the protagonist
I mean....
meh, he kinda outsmarted him, but it wasn't a real duel. later in the same book harry almost murders him when they do it for real
What, if I was going to call debatable it would be the second Vegeta/Goku fight, first one was a clear victory for Vegeta
It is a pretty decent comparison though
As a Vegeta gay, he 100% defeated Goku in their first fight. Vegeta wasn't mad because he "lost" but because Goku went the distance.
In their second fight Goku straight up let him win because he knew transforming into a SS3 would immediately awaken Buu, and plus I don't think it was his intention to humiliate Vegeta.
I knew a kid like this growing up. Like a friend enemy. It's hard to know what to do with those types at the time but you should just punch them in the face.
ok let's say ten years or something from now this weird cultural pozzing stuff dies off and they announce a Harry Potter tv series or series of miniseries that will be relatively faithful to the books but able to expand character roles, minor plots, add some side plots, interlink things between the books a bit better, etc.
what scenes or plots would you add to Malfoy's story arc?
I think a TV series would have to take some liberties that anons wouldn't like. I'd like to see a take on the world that hasn't been done and gets away from the books a little bit. I felt like the mystery aspect wasn't played up enough and the world didn't get enough exposition.
I agree. I think the scale of the world should be explored in a way neither the books or movies really got to do. Just hints of a larger magical population and stuff like that
I think it would also be really good if the first episode was just Harry as a kid in the muggle world ending with Dudley's birthday, to establish him as a character before the magical stuff starts
It would take an amazing showrunner to pull it off, the kind we haven't had in a decade. The existing visual language and apparatus of magic would have to be thrown out entirely, which is why I don't see it happening for a long time.
2 years ago
Anonymous
it's a bit like making any further adaption of LOTR or Tolkien's work, everyone has an idea of how things look now, and with Harry Potter that would be even worse as LOTR had decades of artists depicting things before the movies. The HP movies came out only a few years after the first book did. If the series had been left to linger and then gradually fall off in pop culture consciousness and then just be considered a classic of YA literature I could've seen a new series coming out in a few years from now
but with those dumbledore/magical creatures movies that are sanctioned by the original author that just pushes it aside and I agree with
will they reboot the movies? maybe. i personally think they'll just look for more spinoff ideas, snape spinoff etc
His story never goes anywhere. He should have gone full evil and killed Dumbledore instead of Snape. But no, she had to do the "bullies are really just cowards on the inside" trope which is really annoying
He's not Harry's nemesis, Voldemort is. Malfoy just exists to be a nuisance/thorn in the good guys' side.
But Voldemort was pathetic as well. He couldn't even takeover a school or kill a bunch of teenagers.
You can't compare Hogwarts to just any random muggle school. Its literally the only magical school in the UK. Only the best of the best attend.
>POTTAH
>see mudblood
>day ruined
That kid literally never won once against Potter and his greasy pals
He broke Harry's nose at the beginning of Half-Blood Prince
Harry is unironically a Chad though
>always wins
>has friends everywhere
>multiple girls on his dick
>the principal, the janny and some teachers always have his back
>"The Boy Who Lived"
How can PureCucks even compete?
There's at least one chapter in every book where the entire school hates Harry.
The janny doesn't have his back. Harry makes the janny seethe. Filch is the janny, not Hagrid.
Right. I forgot Hagrid is the gatekeeper, not the janny
gamekeeper
he takes care of the invisible horses and such
>Harry makes the janny seethe.
even more based
>How can PureCucks even compete?
Harry is a pureblood, both of his parents are wizards. Haven't watched Harry Potter in years but I'm fairly sure that even if one wizard parent is a mudblood then their children are still considered purebloods
>Marries a 3/10 bong because he has mommy issues instead of staying the most hunted bachelor in the wizarding world
The next movie should be called "Harry Potter and his poor life choices"
>successfully enacts a plan to murder Dumbledore in your path
heh, nothing personnel, mudblood
Harry Potter is a power fantasy for children. Malfoy is a stand in for the bullies that kids want to BTFO. But yes, from a story telling point of view, Draco seemed like a waste; especially in Deathly Hallows.
He's a sniveling coward yet all women loved the character, one of the most redpilling characters in fiction.
Irl he was most likely to have shagged watson she still blushes when talking to him
he was just an incel with bad parenting. I've never felt that he was supposed to be a villain past the second movie. He felt more like a conflicted kid than anything else
>character's name means Bad Faith
>"Gee, I wonder if he's acting in good faith"
He was just a snobby rich bully. He didn't cross the line into serious crime
>mfw he doesn't know what nemesis means
Draco was a rival
He was bad at it as well.
True, but Snatch is all about people thinking themselves as bigshots while being rather pathetic losers
Easily the best Ritchie's film
'Orrible c**t
based and Brick-Top pilled
who will play him in the inevitable remake
Zendaya
meh, draco was the vegeta of harry potter
>starts off pure evil
>aristocratic
>has an edge over the protagonist due to his heritage
>never has a clear victory against the protagonist (the first vegeta/goku fight is debatable)
>has a redemption arc realizing he prefers being good
>starts off pure evil
by offering to be Harry's friend?
Only in movie, in book he made a scene in Madam Malkin's shop
>making a scene is pure evil
Draco is a spoiled brat, he isn't evil
he's just annoying in Madam Malkin's acting like any weird rich kid trying to impress some they jsut met
the same scene of him offering friendship to Harry on the train is in the books too
Vegeta beat Goku twice, although the second time it was a sneak attack and Goku would have won by going SSJ3
Nonetheless, the score is 2-0
I said it was debatable because vegeta ultimately lost, but we can consider it a victory
the second fight was a cheap shot when they weren't even fighting, absolutely doesn't count
meh, he kinda outsmarted him, but it wasn't a real duel. later in the same book harry almost murders him when they do it for real
>never has a clear victory against the protagonist
I mean....
What, if I was going to call debatable it would be the second Vegeta/Goku fight, first one was a clear victory for Vegeta
It is a pretty decent comparison though
As a Vegeta gay, he 100% defeated Goku in their first fight. Vegeta wasn't mad because he "lost" but because Goku went the distance.
In their second fight Goku straight up let him win because he knew transforming into a SS3 would immediately awaken Buu, and plus I don't think it was his intention to humiliate Vegeta.
>disarmed Dumbledork and was unwittingly master of the Elder Wand for about a year
Based.
You'd think the fricking Elder Wand would be harder to get than using a simple spell that ten year olds learn in their first year at magic school
The rival in Zeta Gundam is more pathetic.
>"PATHETIC?!"
>My father will heard about this!
he was never harry's nemesis I don't think he ever actually cared about him
They were setting up some sort of rivalry, at least at the start. Then he progressively became less relevant throughout the story
I mean the whole Half-Blood Prince was about him and Snape
What if Draco was a girl?
Imagine if Malfoy was a sexy tsundere who was only mean to harry because she wanted to frick him, haha.
Stop it pls
It would have been too unfair to every other one of Harry's potential love interests
bitches love draco
No he redeemed himself when Depp summoned him to testify for the Kino trial and gave the best BTFO in court history.
Go watch anime. It can get WAY worse.
Fine day Sunday. Do you know why that is anons?
it's morbin time
he was hardly a nemesis, that was voldemort.
I knew a kid like this growing up. Like a friend enemy. It's hard to know what to do with those types at the time but you should just punch them in the face.
Literally no reason to make Malfoy some scared cuck. He could have easily been the "Kaiba" of the show but he was literally a crying pussy.
Is still amazes me that Rowling didn't went for "muh redemption" for him in last book
>Scared, Bredehoft?
ok let's say ten years or something from now this weird cultural pozzing stuff dies off and they announce a Harry Potter tv series or series of miniseries that will be relatively faithful to the books but able to expand character roles, minor plots, add some side plots, interlink things between the books a bit better, etc.
what scenes or plots would you add to Malfoy's story arc?
>what scenes or plots would you add to Malfoy's story arc?
That deleted scene from DH part 2 where he throws Potter's wand to him
will they reboot the movies? maybe. i personally think they'll just look for more spinoff ideas, snape spinoff etc
the spinoffs are dreadful so I can only hope they at some point do a comfy show reimagining off of the books rather than try to redo the movies
The movies are not the best format for those books, imo. It should be a tv series if it ever comes to rebooting it, live action or animated.
I think a TV series would have to take some liberties that anons wouldn't like. I'd like to see a take on the world that hasn't been done and gets away from the books a little bit. I felt like the mystery aspect wasn't played up enough and the world didn't get enough exposition.
I agree. I think the scale of the world should be explored in a way neither the books or movies really got to do. Just hints of a larger magical population and stuff like that
I think it would also be really good if the first episode was just Harry as a kid in the muggle world ending with Dudley's birthday, to establish him as a character before the magical stuff starts
It would take an amazing showrunner to pull it off, the kind we haven't had in a decade. The existing visual language and apparatus of magic would have to be thrown out entirely, which is why I don't see it happening for a long time.
it's a bit like making any further adaption of LOTR or Tolkien's work, everyone has an idea of how things look now, and with Harry Potter that would be even worse as LOTR had decades of artists depicting things before the movies. The HP movies came out only a few years after the first book did. If the series had been left to linger and then gradually fall off in pop culture consciousness and then just be considered a classic of YA literature I could've seen a new series coming out in a few years from now
but with those dumbledore/magical creatures movies that are sanctioned by the original author that just pushes it aside and I agree with
His story never goes anywhere. He should have gone full evil and killed Dumbledore instead of Snape. But no, she had to do the "bullies are really just cowards on the inside" trope which is really annoying
Seeking yet another 15 minutes of fame this school year, Potter?
He legit looks more like Draco than Tom Felton does these days.
>scared, Potter?
Emma Watson was head over heels for this guy and he turned her down
Yes but I still enjoyed his scenes so I wouldn’t call it bad writing