speaking of, wasn't there a pro gay marriage ad that used nintendo characters?
it seems weird for that to be OK'd but it was weirdly high quality from what i remember
It’s literally the opposite of being based.
Which I wouldn’t expect a corporate-wienersucking mouthbreather like you to comprehend, given you think based just means ‘duhh thing I like’
Nintendo is also the Disney replacement. They are Disney's true competition NOT Studio Ghibli. Nintendo wants to BE Disney right down to the bloody theme parks. And no this isn't a good thing. Nintendo is full of shitty c**ts. Charging full price for an ancient game like Zelda Skyward Sword (which was also a divisive Zelda game as well due to its controls) is merely ONE thing wrong with Nintendo. Nintendo is shit and their future empire will be a hideous one.
>They are Disney's true competition NOT Studio Ghibli.
Wait, is anybody actually still saying in 2022 that Ghibli is Disney's competition? Ghibli hasn't made a theatrical film in 8 years. All they've done recently has been a mediocre CG TV special and a Miyazaki vanity project that's probably won't even be released before he dies.
This. They try to regulate on how Bowser is portrayed drinking coffee, and anons here will try to tell you there is no mandate saying how Mario should be portrayed in spinoffs to a stagnating degree.
Probably, even though we meme about Toad minions Nintendo is going to have its iron grip on that flick. I doubt illumination will have any say at all. Nintendo just needs access to their animation studio and their focus testing blood magic.
Almost certainly. Unless you're some sort of trusted figure within Nintendo, I doubt you have any sort of creative freedom with Nintendo IP. I can't imagine working around Miyamoto's expectations for the Mario franchise will result in a compelling movie either.
Yes. And the fact that Nintendo is being way too secretive about the movie. Charlie Day, who VAs, Luigi in the movie, says that he has never seen one second of footage from the movie even though he works on it. Nintendo just gives him the script and he has to do about 100 takes to get the line right because he literally can't see what he's looking at.
I would like to think they're making a masterpiece but it's far more likely they're just making it as generic as possible to the point that it won't have a single funny moment in it.
Fricking good. Nintendo is one of the few companies that can actually effectively tell Disney to frick off, so holding their ground like that is a good thing.
Not entirely true, some of that was ironed out through a number of deals with square. I think they got some very favorable promotions and percentages on a bunch of games without money changing hands.
>Nintendo to Disney: We must explain to you in detail how Bowser should hold his cup frame by frame >Nintendo to Ubisoft: Yeah you can let Luigi hit that dab fr fr no cap
Ubisoft....passionate? You should be beaten to death for saying that. Especially due to recent times. Those Ubisoft bastards, glad I never bought their trash in the first place.
The weird on-off switch of Japanese autism is pretty amazing >ah can we give Link a little sister in Hyrule Warriors? >NO LINK ALREADY HAS A SISTER IT IS ARYL I DON'T CARE THAT YOU'RE NOT MAKING A GAME ABOUT WIND WAKER LINK ONLY HAS ONE SISTER EVER WHY DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT THE SANCTITY OF THIS SERIES >ok can we make the bad guy a yandere titty monster with mega choco baby feeders >lol sure why not
Nintendo has done work with outside developers with Mario so they're likely more comfortable. They haven't done anything since the live action Mario movie and probably still wake up screaming in the night from it.
I seriously feel like Iwatas death will strongly affect Nintendo, you cant attribute the Switch success to the new president, the Switch was pretty much already done before Iwata passed, what you can blame on Doug Bowser is how current Nintendo is doing...which is extremely bad, lacking and uninteresting even to Nintendo fans
After Bayo 3, Zelda, and Metroid...what is Nintendo offering for the remaining year and next?
NoA has a lot to do with nintendo. Reggie's memoir covers how he pretty much turned the entire american distribution around and was very directly involved in building relationships with third parties and, not so much the production but the presentation of major titles. Anon is moronic, but not for that reason.
2 years ago
Anonymous
that just shows how NoA has absolutely little to do with development and more of american distribution
Ubisoft....passionate? You should be beaten to death for saying that. Especially due to recent times. Those Ubisoft bastards, glad I never bought their trash in the first place.
again, go read up on Mario+Rabbids production, because I'm specifically talking about a specific developer in one of its studios
2 years ago
Anonymous
There's a lot more that goes on with NoA related to acquisition and development as they are a liaison with the home office but they are more of a distributor in general.
Frenchies, other Japanese weebs and in house stuff probably doesn't scare them as much as moronic corporate America. We are known to frick up our media (especially film) extraordinarily. It's probably why Miyamoto chose Illumination. They are French.
You have it wrong. Miyamoto himself DEMANDED there be a Luigi Dab in the game. He initially pressed for a Mario Floss, but the animators didn't want to spend the time on that and settled on the dab.
No make sense Nintendo experience with American studio managing their character is not ideal in the past, remember the old captain N cartoons or the suppose Zelda show Netflix wanted to make that got shut down after seen a couple of clips
Don't play Street Fighter, but couldn't M. Bison say the same things to Ralph? His explanation for Zangief being a villain to him just because he was hard comes off as a little pathetic.
It's weird how they picked Illumination, a studio known for having one successful franchise they've milked for the past decade, out of everyone they could have gone with. They're gonna have to go all-in on the executive control with their writers and marketing if they want to make something even remotely in line with their IP.
>a studio known for having one successful franchise they've milked for the past decade
Nintendo has 3-4 successful franchises that they've milked for more than a decade. Seems like a great fit.
If you're using someone else's character for profit, they have every right to limit how you profit off their character. For all Disney know, Nintendo may have been considering portraying King Koopa drinking coffee in subsequent games and did not want to be limited to however Disney portrayed him drinking coffee. (Or if they deviated from that, losing business from nitpicky customers who came up with fan theories about it being "a different king koopa".)
What really bothers me is when they start regulating stuff that WASN'T for profit, like APM. You should not be stifling fanart. They should have the right to portray the characters however they want up until; but not including; the moment they accept a single penny for it.
>they have every right to limit how you profit off their character
The coffee drinking autism isnt limiting how they profit of it, but how they show him behaving. Which they also have the right to, but its a very diferent thing >For all Disney know, Nintendo may have been considering portraying King Koopa drinking coffee in subsequent games and did not want to be limited to however Disney portrayed him drinking coffee.
Anyone without a special brand of autism would just ignore that and have the character drink the damn coffee however they thought better. >Or if they deviated from that, losing business from nitpicky customers who came up with fan theories about it being "a different king koopa"
Are nintendo fans REALLY this nitpicky or is this just a wild hypothetical?
Nintendo is extremely anal about how it portrays any of it's characters to a stifling degree.
>extremely anal
>airs commercial of bowser sticking a figurine of himself up his rectum
sensible_chuckle.gif
>airs commercial of bowser sticking a figurine of himself up his rectum
elaborate
Someone made an edit of a Japanese Bowser's Inside Story commercial to imply that, and tards believe it's real.
speaking of, wasn't there a pro gay marriage ad that used nintendo characters?
it seems weird for that to be OK'd but it was weirdly high quality from what i remember
I do wonder how hard Nintendo still white knuckles their chairs, wishing they could remove every piece of fanart.
Sounds like a case of being based.
It’s literally the opposite of being based.
Which I wouldn’t expect a corporate-wienersucking mouthbreather like you to comprehend, given you think based just means ‘duhh thing I like’
Nah, I don't think you understand what it means, and it's funny that you talk about sucking corporate wiener when you're hanging off of Disney's.
Nintendo is also the Disney replacement. They are Disney's true competition NOT Studio Ghibli. Nintendo wants to BE Disney right down to the bloody theme parks. And no this isn't a good thing. Nintendo is full of shitty c**ts. Charging full price for an ancient game like Zelda Skyward Sword (which was also a divisive Zelda game as well due to its controls) is merely ONE thing wrong with Nintendo. Nintendo is shit and their future empire will be a hideous one.
>They are Disney's true competition NOT Studio Ghibli.
Wait, is anybody actually still saying in 2022 that Ghibli is Disney's competition? Ghibli hasn't made a theatrical film in 8 years. All they've done recently has been a mediocre CG TV special and a Miyazaki vanity project that's probably won't even be released before he dies.
Ghibli is dead.
This. They try to regulate on how Bowser is portrayed drinking coffee, and anons here will try to tell you there is no mandate saying how Mario should be portrayed in spinoffs to a stagnating degree.
>mandategay is a Cinemaphile rat
explains a lot
>thinking only one guy believes in the mandate
Is that the reason to why the Mario movie by Illumination has taken so long
Probably, even though we meme about Toad minions Nintendo is going to have its iron grip on that flick. I doubt illumination will have any say at all. Nintendo just needs access to their animation studio and their focus testing blood magic.
Almost certainly. Unless you're some sort of trusted figure within Nintendo, I doubt you have any sort of creative freedom with Nintendo IP. I can't imagine working around Miyamoto's expectations for the Mario franchise will result in a compelling movie either.
That and it got delayed because Sonic 2 did so well. They don't want to get embarrassed in theaters.
We're going to get a situation where Mario is DCU and Sonic is MCU, aren't we?
I've said this already, you'll be sourly disappointed if you don't think the Mario movie will outperform Sonic by a massive margin.
Yes. And the fact that Nintendo is being way too secretive about the movie. Charlie Day, who VAs, Luigi in the movie, says that he has never seen one second of footage from the movie even though he works on it. Nintendo just gives him the script and he has to do about 100 takes to get the line right because he literally can't see what he's looking at.
I would like to think they're making a masterpiece but it's far more likely they're just making it as generic as possible to the point that it won't have a single funny moment in it.
Imagine if after all this work and jap autism it still ends up being embarrassingly worse than the sonic movies, which were shockingly good.
It's no different than any of the other companies, protecting their brands and IPs. You just heard about this one.
Fun Fact: Nintendo was going to overcharge the ever-loving shit out of dis for mario and luigi and dis just settled for just bowser.
Fun fact: the animatics had Dr Wily at the Bad Anon meeting, but he was replaced by M Bison in the final film.
Fricking good. Nintendo is one of the few companies that can actually effectively tell Disney to frick off, so holding their ground like that is a good thing.
Disney got their revenge by charging an arm and leg for Sora to be in Smash.
Not entirely true, some of that was ironed out through a number of deals with square. I think they got some very favorable promotions and percentages on a bunch of games without money changing hands.
If I were Nintendo and some other company asked if they could use my character, I'd say sure and then pull shit like this to troll them.
>Nintendo to Disney: We must explain to you in detail how Bowser should hold his cup frame by frame
>Nintendo to Ubisoft: Yeah you can let Luigi hit that dab fr fr no cap
Good
>one made by soullees company
>one was made by a passionate developer
>passionate developer
>Ubisoft
>he thinks everything is a conglomerate
you really don't know the whole story behind Mario+Rabbids do you
Ubisoft....passionate? You should be beaten to death for saying that. Especially due to recent times. Those Ubisoft bastards, glad I never bought their trash in the first place.
The weird on-off switch of Japanese autism is pretty amazing
>ah can we give Link a little sister in Hyrule Warriors?
>NO LINK ALREADY HAS A SISTER IT IS ARYL I DON'T CARE THAT YOU'RE NOT MAKING A GAME ABOUT WIND WAKER LINK ONLY HAS ONE SISTER EVER WHY DON'T YOU CARE ABOUT THE SANCTITY OF THIS SERIES
>ok can we make the bad guy a yandere titty monster with mega choco baby feeders
>lol sure why not
Gotta say, you're making them sound pretty based. Incidentally I want to bareback frick Midna's imp pussy.
Nintendo has done work with outside developers with Mario so they're likely more comfortable. They haven't done anything since the live action Mario movie and probably still wake up screaming in the night from it.
Remember that time Platinum was going to tone down the Nintendo costumes, only to be told "What the frick are you doing? Get them breasts out."
I seriously feel like Iwatas death will strongly affect Nintendo, you cant attribute the Switch success to the new president, the Switch was pretty much already done before Iwata passed, what you can blame on Doug Bowser is how current Nintendo is doing...which is extremely bad, lacking and uninteresting even to Nintendo fans
After Bayo 3, Zelda, and Metroid...what is Nintendo offering for the remaining year and next?
...anon NoA has nothing to do with Nintendo
also you really are moronic
NoA has a lot to do with nintendo. Reggie's memoir covers how he pretty much turned the entire american distribution around and was very directly involved in building relationships with third parties and, not so much the production but the presentation of major titles. Anon is moronic, but not for that reason.
that just shows how NoA has absolutely little to do with development and more of american distribution
again, go read up on Mario+Rabbids production, because I'm specifically talking about a specific developer in one of its studios
There's a lot more that goes on with NoA related to acquisition and development as they are a liaison with the home office but they are more of a distributor in general.
Yeah that's my point. They are an arm of NoJ.
>Disney
Smug Americans homosexuals
>Mario+Rabbids devs no, not Ubisoft as a whole you moron
Humble French weebs
Frenchies, other Japanese weebs and in house stuff probably doesn't scare them as much as moronic corporate America. We are known to frick up our media (especially film) extraordinarily. It's probably why Miyamoto chose Illumination. They are French.
You have it wrong. Miyamoto himself DEMANDED there be a Luigi Dab in the game. He initially pressed for a Mario Floss, but the animators didn't want to spend the time on that and settled on the dab.
Nintendo is incredibly brand protective, especially where western media companies are concerned, because they (justifiably) don't trust them.
Blame the live action movie for traumatizing them and making them unable to trust western producers
No make sense Nintendo experience with American studio managing their character is not ideal in the past, remember the old captain N cartoons or the suppose Zelda show Netflix wanted to make that got shut down after seen a couple of clips
Yeah because a big ass turtle / dinosaur creature playing fricking tennis isn't goofy or anything...
Is Nintendo effectively the Disney of both video games and Japan?
>Capcom allowed Zangief to be in there even though he is not a villain
He worked for Bison in the movie
I thought everyone agreed that Zangief is just there for the free tea and coffee
Don't play Street Fighter, but couldn't M. Bison say the same things to Ralph? His explanation for Zangief being a villain to him just because he was hard comes off as a little pathetic.
He's Russian.
>Zangief is a bad guy because the movie's director got filtered by him
It’s protecting your work, something you anons will never get because you don’t have any work.
I have work, I didn't protect it and now it's been bastardized beyond the point of salvation and there is nothing I can do about it.
Projecting.
This was definitely revenge for Disney funding the Mario Bros movie
Sure, but Luigi can dab
Why did they use Bowser over Donkey Kong? A character whose game was actually playable in arcades nonetheless.
Because no one remembers those games, grandpa.
If Nintendo were this anal with Disney I imagine they're holding Illumination at gunpoint for the Mario movie
>Nintendo, the safest vidya company
>Illumination, the safest animation studio
The Mario movie won't be worth talking about.
It's weird how they picked Illumination, a studio known for having one successful franchise they've milked for the past decade, out of everyone they could have gone with. They're gonna have to go all-in on the executive control with their writers and marketing if they want to make something even remotely in line with their IP.
>a studio known for having one successful franchise they've milked for the past decade
Nintendo has 3-4 successful franchises that they've milked for more than a decade. Seems like a great fit.
are you that rare golden sun gay perchance
>Nintendo, the safest vidya company
that's capcom
makes me think they had the bowser dildo removed because it wasn't accurate to his wiener
If you're using someone else's character for profit, they have every right to limit how you profit off their character. For all Disney know, Nintendo may have been considering portraying King Koopa drinking coffee in subsequent games and did not want to be limited to however Disney portrayed him drinking coffee. (Or if they deviated from that, losing business from nitpicky customers who came up with fan theories about it being "a different king koopa".)
What really bothers me is when they start regulating stuff that WASN'T for profit, like APM. You should not be stifling fanart. They should have the right to portray the characters however they want up until; but not including; the moment they accept a single penny for it.
>they have every right to limit how you profit off their character
The coffee drinking autism isnt limiting how they profit of it, but how they show him behaving. Which they also have the right to, but its a very diferent thing
>For all Disney know, Nintendo may have been considering portraying King Koopa drinking coffee in subsequent games and did not want to be limited to however Disney portrayed him drinking coffee.
Anyone without a special brand of autism would just ignore that and have the character drink the damn coffee however they thought better.
>Or if they deviated from that, losing business from nitpicky customers who came up with fan theories about it being "a different king koopa"
Are nintendo fans REALLY this nitpicky or is this just a wild hypothetical?
>Are nintendo fans REALLY this nitpicky or is this just a wild hypothetical?
yes anon
they created paper trannies that think mario is mandated
Don't worry the public domain will sort that out eventually. Not even Nintendo can beat the public domain once their characters lose their copyright.
it was gay