Was Kang a good villain ?

Was Kang a good villain ?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    IRL he was a pretty funny (dare I say zesty) villain

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      zesty?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        it means he's gay, black men use it as code cause of the negative connotations of gay

  2. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    no. i automatically take the side of anyone who beats women. it's the only way to make them learn

  3. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    what does AYO mean

  4. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't watch marvel but I will always (ALWAYS) laugh at the fact they had a Black person villain named kang

    It is so god damned funny I will probably be 85 years old cackling to myself in a nursing home

  5. 11 months ago
    Chuck

    He will beat the charges

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      s-sneed?????

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He wuz.

      Sneed lookin ahh nigguh

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can he make literally any other face
      What is up with the constantly pursed lips?

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        He is a master thespian.

  6. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    He was the only good part of the movie.

  7. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    He was a King and shit

  8. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Comic gays what are Kang's powers? I'm not a fan of the comics but it doesn't seem to come close to dr doom in the chad department

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He goes back in time and travels to different universes and ends up getting all tangled up with other versions of himself conquering universes and shit

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He is a genius and uses advanced technology from the future.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      time travel so whatever the writers want

  9. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I bursted into laughter when I saw the ending stadium scene with all the Kangs just chimping out. They weren't cheering or being boisterous, it was full on gorilla behaviour. I couldn't believe it was happening.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      You have to see it to believe it https://youtu.be/s1lTnHDr9zY?t=57

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        What the frick did they mean by this

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          DEY IZ KANGZ

  10. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes in the comics but not in the movies.

  11. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I like the actor. He came in too late in Loki. Didn't have the stomach to watch any Ant Man films past the first one.
    Is he remotely interesting in the newest one?

    I watched one of those two hour videos on the story of Kang in the comics the other day. Interesting shit, and the right kind of convoluted.

    Thanos kinda worked without a origin story movie, because of the multitude of movies setting him up and inferring his motivations.
    I do legitimately think Kang is a good choice of antagonist for an entire phase. But just shoving him in a couple of movies with the lamest rushed explanations, and adding time travel shenanigans on top of the already bloated multiverse shit, is like farting on your date because you forgot to wear cologne

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Is he remotely interesting in the newest one?
      He's the only actor actually trying. And he does have actual presence. Then they ruined him by having him job to fricking giant ants just so Antman can stand a chance in a fist fight.

      • 11 months ago
        Anonymous

        >He's the only actor actually trying. And he does have actual presence.

        LOL what?
        You are just assigning greater value to him because he is black.

        • 11 months ago
          Anonymous

          It's not that. It's that everybody else is terrible.

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            This, everybody else is just doing bits until the clock runs out. He's the only one there trying to keep his job.

            • 11 months ago
              Anonymous

              >He's the only one there trying to keep his job.

              No one is being fooled..

          • 11 months ago
            Anonymous

            He was worse than all of them.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Is he remotely interesting in the newest one?
      No, not really. They just kind of reintroduce Kang for those who haven't seen Loki, except this time he's a little bit more evil. You see some of his suit's powers. Generic beams and force fields. But the whole thing is almost like a retelling of Loki, it's the same "I'm trying to stop a war, a war of...me"

  12. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    I personally don't like Kang.

    What I don't even understand is how the Avengers are even going to fight this guy. Even without the time travel and dimension hopping shit he held his own against three Avengers and two separate armies all at once. His suit is like Iron Man's suit on steroids.

    Now we're going to add a whole council of Kangs that can wage war OUTSIDE of time and space. Even if the Avengers were aware that he existed, how do they even confront just one of them? One Kang can just pick any point in time and just jump on in with a full tech suit ready to rock. The only thing I can think of is bringing in Iron Lad.

    After Infinity War the whole thing just seems fricking stupid. The TV shows fricking suck. I just watched the first episode of Secret Invasion and I can already tell that it's not going to have any long lasting impact like everyone thinks it is. It's just going to be some stupid shit that has no bearing on the MCU as a whole.

  13. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    If he didn't act like a saturday morning cartoon villain maybe. I was expecting WAY more brains from the guy who kills avengers for breakfast.

  14. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, but they should have had the actor change his resting face. I get it's like Thanos where he's bored of communicating with lesser beings, but I see the actor looking bored instead. If that makes any sense

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      I don't know if bored is the right word. Similar to bored, but because he's so arrogant and thinks he can crush people with the flick of his wrist (which he can). I would say more of smug sense of superiority and wannabe royalty.

    • 11 months ago
      Anonymous

      He is a shit actor.
      Film at 11.

  15. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sugar in the tank
    His pouting also looks as if he's a Zoolander side character

  16. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    Everytime I see this character he looks so sweaty and moist but apparently it's not sweat but just strange scars on his face? Haven't watched the film and never will though.

  17. 11 months ago
    Anonymous

    He Wuz Kang. For real.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *