Was Kubrick a coomer?

Was Kubrick a coomer?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    My older israeli normie cousin Joel made me watch this scene when I was like 9 years old and he called me gay because I was horrified by it. I'm gonna beat the shit out of that homosexual one day.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Damn you got humiliation ritualed goyboy

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      kek he was testing the waters and angry that you reacted upset to pornography.
      He probably molested other children though.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >having a israeli cousin
      oh no no no no no no no

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Joel is a homosexual pedo and he was trying to get your dick out.

  2. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    Name one filmmaker who isn’t one.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Mel gibson

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I DESERVE TO BE BLOWN FIRST! BEFORE THE FRICKING JACUZZI!

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >Anons never seen passion of the Christ
        Kek

  3. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    He had exceptional taste in breast.

  4. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it furthered my attraction to redheads

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      based color-blind smoothbrain

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        NTa but she absolutely is a redhead you're moronic

  5. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No. Literally an anti coomer.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >Literally an anti coomer.
      Then why did he make a scene like this?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Because it was in the novel.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        Because it showed Alex's degeneracy with violence and sex, it's not like you could jerk off to it anyway.

  6. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    of course. why do you think he took all that nude footage of Nicole Kidman? I would love to see his vault of film. that shit was be golden.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >why do you think he took all that nude footage of Nicole Kidman?
      Filtered. The movie pans up on Nicole nudity as a tease, Kubrick is implanting the fantasy in the audience the same way Bill has Alice as his fantasy. Right after that nudity it cuts to Alice on the toilet to undercut the fantasy.

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        That did not stop mefrom busting a fat nut to nude Nicole Kidman tho

  7. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    I never watched this movie. Post a webm.

  8. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    it's easy to confuse him as a coomer but he was actually a mega autist that was just trying to emulate what an actual coomer is like in scenes like this

  9. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Filming the rape scene was so difficult for the actress originally cast in the role that she quit. The part was recast with Adrienne Corri, who was said to have been furious at the large number of takes that Stanley Kubrick required, feeling it ought to have been done swiftly. Malcolm McDowell, however, has stated that Corri was very "game" about the brief but difficult role and the nudity throughout filming and she even joked that he would get to see that she is a "natural redhead."
    >she even joked that he would get to see that she is a "natural redhead."
    what did Adrienne Corri mean with this?

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >what did Adrienne Corri mean with this?
      Anon you're a virgin aren't you

  10. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    janny?

  11. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    >Adrienne Corri, who plays home invasion rape victim Mrs. Alexander, said in a 1990 interview that Stanley Kubrick could be difficult, especially for women. When Corri, who was 40 at the time, auditioned for the role, she said Kubrick really liked her for the part, but he said that for the next step of the process, she had to take all her clothes off and be photographed and videotaped. She had no issue being totally naked for the scene if cast, but she wasn't going to do it during the audition, so she told Kubrick to go "stuff it." He said other actresses were doing it, but she didn't care and left. Kubrick cast another actress, but didn't like her. After two days, she ended up in the hospital because the rape scene was so tough to do. Kubrick asked Corri to come back and she agreed, but she wasn't doing the nude audition. Kubrick said, "Suppose we don't like your breasts?" So she told him, "Then you pay me and you send me back, Stanley, but you pay me." So he agreed. Corri said she ended up enjoying working with Kubrick and thought the rape scene was done very well.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      Of course. Once you throw the dollars around you can call them whatever you want stripper or actress.

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      What the frick is wrong with Kubrick?

  12. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    yes

    pic related is how he casted the babes

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >SPECTACULAR BUST
      holy based

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        you just have to watch EWS once to know that Kubrick would have spammed booba if he was a teenager this day and age

    • 2 years ago
      Anonymous

      >VGF
      >VG
      >F.F.F.
      >VLB
      What's all this then

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        I'd assume
        >very good face
        >very good
        no idea
        >very large bust

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        ok, I didn't watch the presentation so I don't really know what the dude is talking about but I snipped the image from this vidya

        • 2 years ago
          Anonymous

          qrd?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >FFF
        Frickable feminine figure?

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        >F.F.F
        FAT FUGGIN FLAPPERS 😀

      • 2 years ago
        Anonymous

        yes

        pic related is how he casted the babes

        FFF is Fun Fun Fun.

  13. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    no, he was just an overrated israelite.

  14. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    No.

  15. 2 years ago
    Anonymous

    is there any significance to the painting or was kubrick finding any reason to put his wife's shit artwork in the movie?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *