Ralph was manipulated by King Candy. So while he was wrong, he thought he was doing the right thing. The first time watching the movie I thought King Candy was at least partially telling the truth.
>King Candy was at least partially telling the truth.
Technically he was telling truth. King Candy manipulated the code to make Venelope unable to leave her game. And there is a real possibility that seeing a glitch in a game could cause it to shut down. He was telling the truth and gave a logical scenario, but that's because he made that scenario possible. He also gave Ralph the medal so Ralph had no reason to stick around.
Luckily Vanelope's glitching is seen as a fun exploit the devs missed that could be used to win, rather than a game breaking glitch that makes the player lose the game.
Then in the sequel they make leaving your game perfectly and even if your the star character of your own game. Also permanently joining a different game with no copyright issues that causes coders to delete her
>Also permanently joining a different game with no copyright issues that causes coders to delete her
The original had QBert join Ralph. Which is nice for the orange fella, but I wondered how dangerous it was. If a brick fell on them they could die. Other than that, I don’t mind QBert joining up.
He's taking abou that weird non canon spinoff movie that disregards everything the first movie built.
Still convinced that it was made as a bad example and one day we will see the real sequel.
It's actually her special ability. YOu can see that at the end of the movie.
The player can use her "glitch" three times in a race. The other racers probably have other special abilities as well.
In yet another disregard for everything the original movie stood for the internet one throws that aspect awy kinda, in it you really cannot tell if the player uses the glitch or she does it herself ("Yeah! I love it when she glitches").
From his perspective - no.
Everything King Candy said made complete sense if you assume that Vanellope is a glitch - which to him absolutely looked like.
It was not completely sure, but a genuine threat, depending on how popular Vanellope would be among players.
He knew that she would probably prefer racing even if it meant going with the game - but letting a little girl die? - WHo'd do that, even against her wish.
That scene has to be one of the most emotionally effective I have ever seen. it's not just the pure main event of him destroying it and her crying, it's the whole composition, the little things, the juxtapositions.
Like the moment where he has to overcome his hesitation to for a moment have to be the guy who destroys - something which outside his job in the game he hates (being the bad guy), something normally sweet and nice like candy preventing her from doing anything agains her dream - literally - getting crushed, and ESPECIALLY - the kart engine.
This is one detail that from the first time stood out to me, the poor kart tries its best to withstand the beating, it's not like he once punches and it stops working - the motor runs the whole time until the LAST hit, only then you her it slowly and sadly shut down. This makes the whole thing feel like a death struggle, and is SO effective. It really invokes the feeling that he is destroying the dream painfully slowly hit by hit.
These are very subtle elements which most people probably never consciously notice. They are what truly make this scene as powerful as it is.
>Decent movie made about video games >the tie-in actual video game is garbage >no spin-off game or series about Sugar Rush >"Sequel" completely ignores Sugar Rush
How did Disney drop the ball this hard?
>Completely misunderstood why the first one was loved: The vidya cameos were cool and fun to see but they were just bonuses to the story being told and the main characters which were the shining israeliteels of the movie. The sequel spends way too much time focusing on IP/cameo circlejerking than actually being good. >Actual story and resolution is shit. None of the events of the first movie are talked about even when it would make perfect sense to talk about Turbo in relation to Vanellope trying to leave her game. >Characterization is beyond fricked. Ralph goes from a gentle giant who just wants to be respected to a sniveling idiotic manbaby that can't stand to be away from Vanellope. Vanellope goes from a lovable scamp with dreams to be respected as an equal among her racers to a selfish brat who grows bored of what she spent the entire first movie trying to achieve. >Felix and Calhoun barely show up despite being main characters in the first movie. >Cringe and poorly-aged memes and internet trends
I could go on and on but I think I speak for a lot of people when I say this is one of the, if not THE worst Disney sequel. It sucks because Wreck-It Ralph is my personal favorite Disney movie and Ralph is one of my favorite Disney characters.
I will now go back to pretending this movie does not exist.
Could they in any way have gone MORE against everything the first movie stood for?
>Going full Turbo >Abandoning her game and risking it being unplugged because boredom - while being their queen! So she is also abondoning her subjects
Also the whole plot with the wheel to get them to the web is beyond moronic >That's more than this game makes in a year
So SR now canonically makes less than 60c per day - why would he keep it plugged in at that point?
Also in the first movie TUrbo messing with the code was a huge fricking deal, now: >Don't worry, they added my code to the game, so I'm safe
Because of course they could...
For once I am glad that a movie was spoiled for me. I will never watch it then. Don't want to ruin the memories of the masterpiece that was the first film.
That's the one meme reference I can forgive because Rick Rolling is a timeless piece of internet culture unlike the other memes that were in the movie.
>The vidya cameos were cool and fun to see but they were just bonuses to the story being told
Exactly. But talking about references for a second, they were fun. Going into an arcade game is fun. Going into eBay is not. I don't know if it's even possible to make Google a fun place to visit.
The whole "Ralph doesn't want to be away from Vanellope" plot is so weird, the first movie even ends with him being happy to see her from far away doing her best
He was a friend and watchful figure. He being that clingy felt out of character. If they made it a turbo-like scenario and her dying outside her game, then it would make more sense.
Ralph was manipulated by King Candy. So while he was wrong, he thought he was doing the right thing. The first time watching the movie I thought King Candy was at least partially telling the truth.
>So while he was wrong, he thought he was doing the right thing
This is something a shitty boomer parent would say.
>a shitty boomer parent
or an adult, or really anyone who understands that the characters don’t have the same knowledge as the viewer
Different circumstances here, nice try though.
GO to your room ass wipe you're grounded
>King Candy was at least partially telling the truth.
Technically he was telling truth. King Candy manipulated the code to make Venelope unable to leave her game. And there is a real possibility that seeing a glitch in a game could cause it to shut down. He was telling the truth and gave a logical scenario, but that's because he made that scenario possible. He also gave Ralph the medal so Ralph had no reason to stick around.
Luckily Vanelope's glitching is seen as a fun exploit the devs missed that could be used to win, rather than a game breaking glitch that makes the player lose the game.
Then in the sequel they make leaving your game perfectly and even if your the star character of your own game. Also permanently joining a different game with no copyright issues that causes coders to delete her
To the player Vanellope would just look like a generic enemy car.
That's one of the few things that does NOT rip a huge hole in the plot in that movie.
>Also permanently joining a different game with no copyright issues that causes coders to delete her
The original had QBert join Ralph. Which is nice for the orange fella, but I wondered how dangerous it was. If a brick fell on them they could die. Other than that, I don’t mind QBert joining up.
One machine in a random arcade versus an online game with a widespread player base.
>itll be like a Polybius legend
>did you hear there's a fix it felix machine with a bonus level featuring Q*bert
>no way, dude. You're making shit up!
There is no Wreck-It Ralph sequel.
He's taking abou that weird non canon spinoff movie that disregards everything the first movie built.
Still convinced that it was made as a bad example and one day we will see the real sequel.
It's actually her special ability. YOu can see that at the end of the movie.
The player can use her "glitch" three times in a race. The other racers probably have other special abilities as well.
In yet another disregard for everything the original movie stood for the internet one throws that aspect awy kinda, in it you really cannot tell if the player uses the glitch or she does it herself ("Yeah! I love it when she glitches").
From his perspective - no.
Everything King Candy said made complete sense if you assume that Vanellope is a glitch - which to him absolutely looked like.
It was not completely sure, but a genuine threat, depending on how popular Vanellope would be among players.
He knew that she would probably prefer racing even if it meant going with the game - but letting a little girl die? - WHo'd do that, even against her wish.
Even Vanellope told Ralph that she couldn't leave. That's two sources where Ralph gets that info.
Of course he did, he had sex with his wife and recorded it! He eat her shit too.
That scene has to be one of the most emotionally effective I have ever seen. it's not just the pure main event of him destroying it and her crying, it's the whole composition, the little things, the juxtapositions.
Like the moment where he has to overcome his hesitation to for a moment have to be the guy who destroys - something which outside his job in the game he hates (being the bad guy), something normally sweet and nice like candy preventing her from doing anything agains her dream - literally - getting crushed, and ESPECIALLY - the kart engine.
This is one detail that from the first time stood out to me, the poor kart tries its best to withstand the beating, it's not like he once punches and it stops working - the motor runs the whole time until the LAST hit, only then you her it slowly and sadly shut down. This makes the whole thing feel like a death struggle, and is SO effective. It really invokes the feeling that he is destroying the dream painfully slowly hit by hit.
These are very subtle elements which most people probably never consciously notice. They are what truly make this scene as powerful as it is.
I could not have said this any better, this perfectly describes why this scene hits me really hard.
Yeah first time I saw it my heart actually hurt. Might be the only cartoon who managed.
vanellope thread time. i love my wife
i'm not letting this thread die look at her
This artist sure does like Vanellope.
understandably so. she's adorable
post more then!
here she is <3
>Decent movie made about video games
>the tie-in actual video game is garbage
>no spin-off game or series about Sugar Rush
>"Sequel" completely ignores Sugar Rush
How did Disney drop the ball this hard?
Most of all
>No Sugar Rush game
What the hell? I'm not counting that quarter-assed thown together online crap.
That opportunity basically screamed them directly in the face!
How could Rich Moore, Jim Reardon, Phil Johnston and Clark Spencer drop the ball so hard with the sequel?
>Completely misunderstood why the first one was loved: The vidya cameos were cool and fun to see but they were just bonuses to the story being told and the main characters which were the shining israeliteels of the movie. The sequel spends way too much time focusing on IP/cameo circlejerking than actually being good.
>Actual story and resolution is shit. None of the events of the first movie are talked about even when it would make perfect sense to talk about Turbo in relation to Vanellope trying to leave her game.
>Characterization is beyond fricked. Ralph goes from a gentle giant who just wants to be respected to a sniveling idiotic manbaby that can't stand to be away from Vanellope. Vanellope goes from a lovable scamp with dreams to be respected as an equal among her racers to a selfish brat who grows bored of what she spent the entire first movie trying to achieve.
>Felix and Calhoun barely show up despite being main characters in the first movie.
>Cringe and poorly-aged memes and internet trends
I could go on and on but I think I speak for a lot of people when I say this is one of the, if not THE worst Disney sequel. It sucks because Wreck-It Ralph is my personal favorite Disney movie and Ralph is one of my favorite Disney characters.
I will now go back to pretending this movie does not exist.
Could they in any way have gone MORE against everything the first movie stood for?
>Going full Turbo
>Abandoning her game and risking it being unplugged because boredom - while being their queen! So she is also abondoning her subjects
Also the whole plot with the wheel to get them to the web is beyond moronic
>That's more than this game makes in a year
So SR now canonically makes less than 60c per day - why would he keep it plugged in at that point?
Also in the first movie TUrbo messing with the code was a huge fricking deal, now:
>Don't worry, they added my code to the game, so I'm safe
Because of course they could...
That movie is so bad and stupid.
For once I am glad that a movie was spoiled for me. I will never watch it then. Don't want to ruin the memories of the masterpiece that was the first film.
the rest of the movie may have been a complete bastardization of the first one, but you have to admit the Wreck Roll at the end was amazing.
That's the one meme reference I can forgive because Rick Rolling is a timeless piece of internet culture unlike the other memes that were in the movie.
>The vidya cameos were cool and fun to see but they were just bonuses to the story being told
Exactly. But talking about references for a second, they were fun. Going into an arcade game is fun. Going into eBay is not. I don't know if it's even possible to make Google a fun place to visit.
The whole "Ralph doesn't want to be away from Vanellope" plot is so weird, the first movie even ends with him being happy to see her from far away doing her best
He was a friend and watchful figure. He being that clingy felt out of character. If they made it a turbo-like scenario and her dying outside her game, then it would make more sense.
mm
extremely incredibly kissable
>Becomes the favourite character of the kids
>One day the character is just gone
How did her game didn't get closed again?