was this opening shot necessary, Cinemaphile, and what was Coppola’s point?
 CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
 |
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
was this opening shot necessary?
was this opening shot necessary, Cinemaphile, and what was Coppola’s point?
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
|
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
She wanted us to see a young Scarlett's hot ass. Why are you complaining?
Yes, go be gay somewhere else.
More likeCtappla
Black person
Very good technique.
>dude movies need MEANING
>what is the MEANING of this scene?
>why were the curtains red? what does it MEAN?
>*[moviename] explained google search*
Why are zoomies like this? I'd love to take a bunch of them to a museum or an art gallery, like a school trip. Imagine their feeble little brains when they see so many different expressions of the human psyche in the form of art. Paintings, sculptures, even the names those were given would send them into a crisis.
Because we have zero meaning in our own lives and the current zeitgeist is bleak. Media is our only escapism but it's becoming more vapid and empty as we are. It's scary.
Gamergate was a nice ushering into the "you can't even have your escapism" psycho-torture regime
>Media is our only escapism
Touch grass moron. There are even museums with outdoor exhibits.
Culture is a reflection of its constituents.
The dysgenic masses of the modern age are no different than the so-called Red Delicious apple, bioengineered by corporations to enhance a single quality at the expense of all others.
In the apple's case they're bred to appear vibrant and enticing to increase the chances of being purchased, but in doing so the flavor has waned and the consistency became mushy.
Similarly, wageslaves have been selectively bred with subtle economic pressures to accept performing the same menial tasks every single day, making others rich, never questioning their place in the world. But with this comes traits such as autism, psychopathy, people with blunted emotions living one-dimensional minimalistic lives.
The kind of simpletons who watch Family Guy, Marvel, "goyslop". There is no place for art in their world, for it would reflect qualities that they do not possess. And people, the narcissists that they are, love most to see themselves represented in the media they consume.
Who would paint a slave?
There's something uniquely repulsive about this misdirection
Who is to blame for your life being vapid and meaningless?
People wholeheartedly enjoy what modern Hollywood produces. They haven't boycotted the lowbrow productions like Barbie or the Mario movie because female empowerment and family unity give representation to the masses. They pay to have their life stories portrayed in some fashion.
Corporations realize America's demographics are shifting so they have been quick to give People of Color the representation they deserve, for it is they who direct the flow of currency in the future.
>watching this with my uncle
>this scene comes on
>he smiles at me and then rapes me
It was a weird choice of opening shot tbqh
Are you lying? Why would you make something like this up?
>>he smiles at me and THEN rapes me
And they say chivalry is dead.
Where's your uncle's favorite opening shot?
Sofia Coppola's movies are weird, because on the one hand she's hyper focused on female stories but somehow her movies are some of the most 'male gazey' I've ever seen
Like 90% of male-oriented movies have shirtless jacked dudes in them.
She pretty much stares at "Pensive Scarjo" and "Bimbo Emma" with her camera
Both men and women enjoy looking at beautiful women. The only people who are against the "male gaze" in movies are jealous bitter ugly feminists.
Very necessary. She’s saying that in order for society to heal and for idealistic terrorists to be completely defeated and shown the error of their ways, one must fall asleep with their face buried inside Scarjo’s ass.
At first I thought that's the one gif where the girl shits herself.
so Japan is ASS
>The film's opening shot, a 36-second take of Charlotte's lower back and upper legs as she lies on a bed wearing transparent pink panties and a gray sweater with white T-shirt underneath, as the credits begin to roll, has been another point of discussion among critics and scholars. It is based on the photorealist paintings of John Kacere[33]
>It took some time to convince Scarlett Johansson that a lingering shot of her bottom, encased in sheer, pink pants, was categorically the only way that director Sofia Coppola could open Lost in Translation, officially the hottest film of next year. Johansson had reservations. 'I really didn't want to do the sheer underwear,' she says. She's not being coy about it. Coy isn't in her repertoire. It doesn't go with her voice, which is low, sardonic, gay-filled. 'I told Sofia. I said, I'll wear underwear, if it isn't sheer. I had to wear underwear, like, the whole movie. It became very easy for me to trounce around in my underwear, in front of a large group of Japanese men. A skill I probably won't utilise again, admittedly. But sheer... sheer was... different.'
>Coppola talked Johansson round. She wanted sheer pink underwear. She'd written precisely those pants into the script. She knew which brand she wanted. Coppola's an aesthete. These kind of things aren't negotiable. And in the end, after Coppola had modelled the pants personally, and Johansson had admired the way they looked on her director's minuscule frame, she agreed.
they fricked didn't they
no
the word categorically was not necessary here
hollywood is full of creeps
What else do people who have wealth for many generations want