unironically sounds based.
current Mexicans are cringe, along with CY+7 woke screeching about colonialism. but colonial spaniards and pre-Columbian Aztecs and Mayans were based.
moron take on history. There were 300 years of colony before independence and millions of spaniards migrated to the new world dueing this time, 99% civilians.
Point being, they're seething about something their own ancestors did by virtue cross breeding. Same way that African Americans are way more likely to actually be the descendents of slave owners than the vast majority of white Americans.
It doesn't, since flashpoint batman has been turn into just a suit. Knightfall was all about how important Bruce Wayne was, but since Johns turned Thomas into batman (not just wearing a bat suit in a party) now the suit is all you need to be barman, Bruce isn't special.
If you had studied Mexican history, youd understand why. Every single time they ousted the priests/rich Spaniards, European powers invaded. And when finally the first democratic candidate was going to reform Mexico in the 1910s, guess what happend to him? Thats right, the OSS assassinated him, which sparked the beginning of the Mexican revolution, which after decades of bloodshed and factionalism, resulted in another dictatorship.
Eh, sometimes they're awesome but the last animated historically themed movie they did (Batman Ninja) was awful and had samurai mechs in shit in the past. Hopefully this ones good, its a cool premise
>Batman Ninja) was awful
How is the HIV going bro? I hope you make it through the next winter, I know a lot of homosexuals are really weak to the common flu.
>There's a reason all their neighbors hated them and gladly sided with the Spaniards.
Uh huh, & the Spaniards kindly left them alone after they helped take down the Aztecs, right? They didn't violently oppress them, slaughter them & force their own shitty religion onto them, did they?
That's what conquerors do Hispanic homosexual, they kill, rape and force their beiefs onto the ones they have conquered. You wouldn't be alive right now if the Spaniards never had their conquest. Be grateful for the white man.
so giving language, culture, religion, law, sanitation, order and civilization to a bunch of savages is oppresing now? And conquering and slaving your neighboors because you need their blood to make the sun appear everyday is the preferable alternative. If conquerors chad had known that despite being treated better than any other inferior civilitation hispanics and fricking libtards would still cry about it perhaps they would have genocided every last one.
>so giving language, culture, religion, law, sanitation, order and civilization to a bunch of savages is oppresing now?
It would help your case if it were true, which it wasnt.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The Aztecs and surrounding tribes didn't have great sanitation. They piled up human feces in their markets since it was used for various purposes. They had order, but it was might makes right, and the cruelty they inflicted on the vanquished was bad even by medieval European standards. Their religion demanded constant sacrifices and ritual cannibalism.
Read "The Conquest of New Spain" by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, it's the most accurate account.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>Read "The Conquest of New Spain" by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, it's the most accurate account.
I have actually. Did you miss the part where the Spaniards engaged in a genocide and rape of the Aztecs/natives, which resulted in the essential end of the native people?
2 years ago
Anonymous
There were never more than 2,000 or 3,000 Spaniards in central America during the events of the book. How did 2,000 people genocide and rape an entire population of hundreds of thousands?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Mexico is in North America not Central America but you're correct. The Tlaxcalans did all the heavy lifting just like the Russians in WW2.
2 years ago
Anonymous
The Spaniards didn't land in Mexico, they landed in central America and marched to Mexico.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>There were never more than 2,000 or 3,000 Spaniards in central America during the events of the book.
The events of the book happen in Mexico as well.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because their fort and ports were in central America, describing the # of Spaniards in central America vs Mexico includes the people who guarded the fort and handled the logistical matters of the ports, and thus is more accurate if you want to describe all of them.
This is why you don't start semantic arguments
2 years ago
Anonymous
>99.99% were in Mexico and the rest in Central America!! therefore they were in Central America!!
?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Mexico is part of Central America you buffoon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>end of native people >more people with native blood living right now than at any point in history
What a weird way to end native people
2 years ago
Anonymous
The Aztecs were not a "tribe" lol
2 years ago
Anonymous
Everything he says is correct. Please save your moronic wasted comments for yourself.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not the guy he was arguing with but the Aztecs were not a "tribe"
2 years ago
Anonymous
The Azteca, AND surrounding tribes.
You're a fricking moron don't ever reply to me again. That other guy is a moron too you two should be friends
2 years ago
Anonymous
fricking moron
What surrounding "tribes"?
2 years ago
Anonymous
Dunno or care about the names!
2 years ago
Anonymous
So you don't know what you're even talking about. Got it.
2 years ago
Anonymous
seethe
fricking moron
2 years ago
Anonymous
seethe
2 years ago
Anonymous
I dont see why I would need to know the names of tribes to know the levels of plumbing primitive peoples had
2 years ago
Anonymous
Because you have no clue what you were talking about. Just spouting ignorance.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So you are saying that these people had highly elaborate plumbing systems implemented? Weird how I have never seen these while walking around
your "civilisation" is oppression, that's the point, it's just a form of oppression that is easy to pass of as something good, a synonm. when you impose your civilisation on another culture you wipe out their own. you have no divine right to impose your norms and your preconcieved notions of good onto another society, which you reduce to "savages" because it is a way for you to get out of admitting that you just want to conquer those you percieve as lesser than you. it's cowardly israelite behavior to pretend that your homosexualy gay culture is somehow better and that you're helping people by wiping out their identity and forcing them to obey your homosexual european cultural norms.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>human sacrifice is true freedom, not being allowed to kill people at will is oppression
funny one, Paco
How is he wrong, moron?
You only care about whites doing anything bad but when your precious savages do something a hundred times worse then you don’t give a shit
You were taught in school and tv that whites are bad so you hate all whites, simple as
So were Aztecs, spanish were just better at it lmao. There's a reason why all local tribes immedeately started helping conqustadors - they fricking despised aztecs.
tbh conqustadors were c**ts still, they would call local leaders to negotation table, when the leader and his people would arrive they'd have a priest there and the priest would declare tribesman lying heretics, therefore there was no point in negotiations, then they'd pull their guns out and just fricking murder everyone.
Uhmmmmmmm EXCUEEEZE ME, chud, but actually it's been scientifically proven that they needed human blood to make the sun rise every day. Also, stay in your lane????
yep, they basically murdered a peaceful tribe and just added their shit on their buildings.
Mayas are the cool ones, they basically were bros with people from Venus.
Unironically, who cares that they were savage man-eaters? They only ate their own. Why does every group of "humans" need to be civilized by outsiders? Maybe if our moronic ancestors hadn't mixed with them, we could live in a society where no one mistakes brown tribal people for being equal to white people.
And at least they had a unique and fascinating culture back then. Now what do they have?
>Unironically, who cares that they were savage man-eaters?
The countless neighbouring tribes they kept raiding and enslaving. Who did most of the wiping out the aztecs stuff when the spaniards arrived, by the way.
And why is it Europe's responsibility, or even right to "save" them? Is it man's responsibility to save the gazelle of Africa from the terror that lions put them through? Should we go and kill all the polar bears because of what they do to seals?
The Aztecs upheld the natural order of their land. Being more advanced does not give you a right to disturb that natural order. And look what came of their interference. South America has never had a real culture since then.
The aztecs mostly sacrificed their neighbours, not their own.
The army that conquered them only had about 1-2% spanish guys in it and the rest were neighbours who were sick of being sacrificed.
>The aztecs mostly sacrificed their neighbours, not their own.
Let them. That was their natural inclination. They should be left to their own devices, no matter how "cruel or abhorrent" advanced humans may view them as. You don't disturb nature just because it's "evil"
Aztecs literally sacrificed people so much they waged war to capture more injuns to sacrifice, and they wore the skins of people they'd off. How the frick are they anything but villains?
I love it so long as they record it all in Spanish for the former cultural imperialists and refuse to dub it into English for the current cultural imperialists
Why even bring Batman into this? Why not just make that same pitch and remove any mention of Batman. Why does Batman need to be everywhere all the time.
didn't the aztecs literally have human sacrifice? avenging your father is in line with the european view of death not the aztecs.
>NOOOOOO you can't just sacrifice my entire heckin village to huitzilopotchli we have basic human rightarinos that you WILL respect, chud! My body my choice, you can't just rip out my- ACK!
It wasn’t just the Spaniards killing the shit out of the Aztecs. The neighboring tribes helped the white invaders because the Aztecs were just that much of fricking bastards.
if batman is obsessed with justice in his aztec society wouldnt he be going around capturing neighboring tribes children to sacrifice to the sun god
The Tlaxcala and other native tribes that sided with the Spaniards against the Aztects would disagree
So were Aztecs, spanish were just better at it lmao. There's a reason why all local tribes immedeately started helping conqustadors - they fricking despised aztecs.
tbh conqustadors were c**ts still, they would call local leaders to negotation table, when the leader and his people would arrive they'd have a priest there and the priest would declare tribesman lying heretics, therefore there was no point in negotiations, then they'd pull their guns out and just fricking murder everyone.
>tribes
Mesoamerica had urban state socities, not "tribes". Even the conquistadors like Cortés and Bernal Díaz and Spanish friars like Durán and Sahagún repeatedly made it a point to praise Mesoamerican cities, cleanliness, rule of law, and intelligence. You also see missionaries directly comparing them to Greeks and Romans in terms of being "civilized pagans"; in spite of sacrifices.
I'm trying to think of something good to say about this but it just looks like it's gonna be awful. Why does it have to be a "batman", why don't you make a random hero character? Because then nobody would watch it, that's why
They don't want all of Ukraine, they wanted the majority Russian speaking parts in the East and to cripple Ukraine from ever becoming actually fortified by NATO. Which they're succeeding in immensely
What exactly is gay about a man dressed in tight spandex and a leather cowl and cape with several boy sidekicks getting physical with several other men in flamboyant costumes?
That's a bit ironic because I'm making a comic about a Spanish boy extracting revenge on the filthy infidel natives who killed his noble Conquistador father.
Who the frick is going to watch this?
I'm "latino" from south america and it looks like shit, not even my leftist anti eupean friends would watch that.
Who the frick cares if he's avenging for his dad or whatever, Aztecs are at war with conquistadors already. Its a last of the mohicans type shit rather than destroying spain
Wouldn't it have been better if it were set in modern day Mexico? The country is basically a failed state. The cartels do what they want with impunity, the government's already lost control of 20% of the country and the current president has basically surrendered. Seems like a pretty good environment for a Batman.
What are liberals stance on this? Do they just make complaints about the cia? >there wouldn’t be a drug trade if we Americans weren’t addicted >the CIA did something decades ago >you would be doing a heckin’ imperialism if you put a stop this
Who knows they love the cia in some cases because of Brenan, also they refuse to admit border security is needed. Guns are almost illegal in Mexico and some guns from US get smuggled down there so they can't even admit security is needed to help another country or even human trafficking. Also remember how gay they got over a few billion and we just sent like 40b to Ukraine for no reason as all our costs are shooting through the roof? Yeah understanding liberals is an exercise in futility.
>Wouldn't it have been better if it were set in modern day Mexico? The country is basically a failed state
Now it makes sense why it takes place in america
Ehh, too heavily armored for that aztec background. Keep the helm lose the armor and just wear feathered skirt and cape.
Paint the bat symbol in his chest with the blood of his fore bearer or something.
Fricking this. Just portray them for what they were–warmongering empires clashing in a battle for supremacy. Obviously, there'll be some bias since the story takes place from Batman's POV, but they better also show the Aztecs conquering and sacking other cities, and the high priests performing sacrifices and keeping slaves.
>not knowing about Batman Inc >not knowing that there are canonically Japanese, Chinese, Native American, etc Batmen.
Do you people actually read comics or do you just complain about things you know nothing about?
I can't wait for Columbus to do cartoonishly horrible shit only for the bat themed avenger from the blood sacrifice practicing culture to just throw him in jail, and then for him to break free and do it all over again.
>Aztec >Mayan facewear >shitty headdress >all black, no flashy design, to keep with le batman aesthetic
why can't the californios get it right damn it its not like there isn't highly detailed sources to pull from
I'd actually watch this if it was about an Aztec batman in Aztec society. Using batman to b***h about conquistadors is pathetic and instantly I lose all interest
Spain is always saying to Latin America: "We brought you civilization" as if they wanted back.
And they actually need some civilization since it's a cultural shithole compared to Latin America.
>WOOF WOOF >The mastiffs, which could weigh as much as 250 pounds and stand three feet high at the shoulder, were brute attackers, while the greyhounds were speedy and made lightning-quick strikes, often trying to disembowel their opponent. In May 1494 the Jamaican natives did not look friendly, so Columbus ordered an attack. One war dog caused absolute terror, so Columbus in his journal wrote that one dog was worth 10 soldiers against Indians. During the Haiti campaign, opposed by a huge native force, all 20 dogs fought at the Battle of Vega Real in March 1495. Alonso de Ojeda, who had fought with them against the Moors, commanded the dogs. He released the dogs shouting, “Tomalos!” (basically, “Sic ’em!”). An observer said that in one hour, each dog had torn apart at least a hundred natives. The island was taken largely by terror of the dogs.
>The Aztecs had dogs. They were small, hairless, timid creatures, related to the modern Chihuahua, which were reared not as pets but as a food source. Accordingly when the Aztecs first met the Spanish war dogs – wolfhounds, greyhounds, lurchers, pit bulls and gigantic mastiffs similar to modern Rottweilers, they had absolutely no idea what they were dealing with. Indeed they did not think these animals were dogs at all. They thought they might be some species of dragon – an impression compounded by the fact that the Spanish dogs were armored in chainmail and steel plate like their masters and were thus almost invulnerable to stone weapons. Fasted before battle so they were in a state of voracious, slavering hunger, trained to fight and kill with the utmost ferocity, these terrifying animals already relished human flesh having been used repeatedly in acts of genocide against the Indians of Hispaniola and Cuba. Unleashed in snarling, baying packs, their tongues lolling, drool dripping from their fangs and sparks of fire seeming – in the imagination of the victims – to flash from their eyes, they tore into the Aztec front lines with devastating effect, disemboweling men, ripping out their throats, feasting on their soft, unarmored bodies. “They have flat ears and are spotted like ocelots,” reported one Aztec eyewitness of the Spanish war dogs. “They have great dragging jowls and fangs like daggers and blazing eyes of burning yellow that flash fire and shoot off sparks. Their bellies are gaunt, their flanks long and lean with the ribs showing. They are tireless and very powerful. They bound here and there, panting, their tongues dripping venom.”
>The names of many of these dogs so esteemed by the Spaniards still live on and here are but a few: >Bercerruillo the terror of Borinquen, until he was fallen by 50 arrows, received a salary one and a half times that of an archer from his owner Ponce de Leon. >Leoncillo (Little Lion), Bercerruillo’s son, was Balboa’s warrior, earned over 500 gold pesos in booty during his many campaigns, and he was the first Western dog to see the Pacific. When ordered to catch a native he would grab the man’s arm in his mouth. If the man came along quietly, they walked slowly to Balboa. If there was any resistance, the dog ripped him apart. >Bruto, De Soto’s champion, received 20 slaves as spoils before his career ended.
basado
What is "I am the night" in taco?
Onions La Noche
I smiled
heh
>Onions
every time
fricking killed me
Holy shit.
they really need to get rid of the wordfilter for onions.
They have probably forgotten it's still there
I wish they'd bring back candyass and roodypoo
its
Yo sóy La Noche, minus the ´
>onions
lmao
kek, it took me a while
Sounds like a new type of taco at Taco Bell
Bravo
Cinemaphile sometimes you aight
Kek.
Also does anyone else think the premise is actually fricking solid? Pity it's probably just some woke shit.
my show is SOLID
beanerbros... we're going home!
absolute legend, put me in screencap homosexual
Venture Bros did this 10 years ago
The tick also had "Batmanuel" mexican batman
unironically sounds based.
current Mexicans are cringe, along with CY+7 woke screeching about colonialism. but colonial spaniards and pre-Columbian Aztecs and Mayans were based.
>current Mexicans are cringe
Mexico has only existed for like 100 years.
200. but it took them 300 to do it
Their current constitution is only 100 years old. Russia is only like 30 years old.
Their first was in 1816, but they just translate it from the USA one
The UK doesn't even have a written constitution.
>violent murderous mexicans bad
>violent murderous mexicans (pagan) good
good and evil are on a different spectrum than based and cringe. one can be evil and based
its dey culcha
>current Mexicans are cringe, along with CY+7 woke screeching about colonialism
Who do you think is making this lol
Aren't they all Spaniard half breed rape babies anyway?
Indeed though it's more of a spectrum from pure aristocratic spaniard ancestry to las ogros de los americanas
moron take on history. There were 300 years of colony before independence and millions of spaniards migrated to the new world dueing this time, 99% civilians.
Point being, they're seething about something their own ancestors did by virtue cross breeding. Same way that African Americans are way more likely to actually be the descendents of slave owners than the vast majority of white Americans.
Can't rape the wiling
yeah it totally won't be anti-colonial anti-white nonsense.
It doesn't, since flashpoint batman has been turn into just a suit. Knightfall was all about how important Bruce Wayne was, but since Johns turned Thomas into batman (not just wearing a bat suit in a party) now the suit is all you need to be barman, Bruce isn't special.
500 years later they still mad and still Spanish speaking Catholics
If you had studied Mexican history, youd understand why. Every single time they ousted the priests/rich Spaniards, European powers invaded. And when finally the first democratic candidate was going to reform Mexico in the 1910s, guess what happend to him? Thats right, the OSS assassinated him, which sparked the beginning of the Mexican revolution, which after decades of bloodshed and factionalism, resulted in another dictatorship.
>resulted in another dictatorship.
lmao
Historical batman stories are always kino.
Eh, sometimes they're awesome but the last animated historically themed movie they did (Batman Ninja) was awful and had samurai mechs in shit in the past. Hopefully this ones good, its a cool premise
>Batman Ninja) was awful
How is the HIV going bro? I hope you make it through the next winter, I know a lot of homosexuals are really weak to the common flu.
It was fricking shit
too bad they fricked up the animated version of that
mike mignola is so kino man
Ayo fuimoz tlaxcaltecas n sheeeit
I'm trying not to be this ignorant but is there any ruins around Tlaxcala or is it just a big ghetto?
Apparently they have a couple of semi significant ruins sites that aren't as overflowing with tourists as some other sites in Mexica land
I Will be really mad if he isn't a mestizo named bruno díaz in every translation.
Might honestly be kino. Interesting concept.
Aztecs were the bad guys.
Uhm, human sacrifice is good, actually
Aztecs & Conquistadors were both equally shitty, honestly.
>both equally shitty
lol no. The Aztec religion was pure evil. There's a reason all their neighbors hated them and gladly sided with the Spaniards.
>There's a reason all their neighbors hated them and gladly sided with the Spaniards.
Uh huh, & the Spaniards kindly left them alone after they helped take down the Aztecs, right? They didn't violently oppress them, slaughter them & force their own shitty religion onto them, did they?
tbf the spaniards did that to white people too
Spaniards are the white people
>t. Spaniard
haha nice cope
This, my country (the netherlands) was founded by rebelling against the spaniards empire/kingdom. Where is my reparations....
>They didn't violently oppress them, slaughter them & force their own shitty religion onto them, did they?
No they didn't.
>They didn't violently oppress them, slaughter them & force their own shitty religion onto them, did they?
Not as bad as the aztecs
That's what conquerors do Hispanic homosexual, they kill, rape and force their beiefs onto the ones they have conquered. You wouldn't be alive right now if the Spaniards never had their conquest. Be grateful for the white man.
Please have sex
It's your mother's day off.
Please. Have. Sex.
It's. Your. Mother's. Day. Off.
Already did. Made love to this Aztec who seemed grateful for the BWC.
Dude, I'm a white guy in New England.
Just like everyone else who defended muh noble savages throughout history.
Yeah, that's why I said both Aztecs & Conquistadors were equally shitty. Because I was "defending them."
a caricature
>violently oppress them, slaughter them & force their own shitty religion onto them
Those were all things the Aztecs did first, worse and more, kek.
"It's Okay When We Do It!"™
That's you though, kek.
Thank you for your concession.
yes. rosary praying>human sacrifice
so giving language, culture, religion, law, sanitation, order and civilization to a bunch of savages is oppresing now? And conquering and slaving your neighboors because you need their blood to make the sun appear everyday is the preferable alternative. If conquerors chad had known that despite being treated better than any other inferior civilitation hispanics and fricking libtards would still cry about it perhaps they would have genocided every last one.
>so giving language, culture, religion, law, sanitation, order and civilization to a bunch of savages is oppresing now?
It would help your case if it were true, which it wasnt.
The Aztecs and surrounding tribes didn't have great sanitation. They piled up human feces in their markets since it was used for various purposes. They had order, but it was might makes right, and the cruelty they inflicted on the vanquished was bad even by medieval European standards. Their religion demanded constant sacrifices and ritual cannibalism.
Read "The Conquest of New Spain" by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, it's the most accurate account.
>Read "The Conquest of New Spain" by Bernal Diaz del Castillo, it's the most accurate account.
I have actually. Did you miss the part where the Spaniards engaged in a genocide and rape of the Aztecs/natives, which resulted in the essential end of the native people?
There were never more than 2,000 or 3,000 Spaniards in central America during the events of the book. How did 2,000 people genocide and rape an entire population of hundreds of thousands?
Mexico is in North America not Central America but you're correct. The Tlaxcalans did all the heavy lifting just like the Russians in WW2.
The Spaniards didn't land in Mexico, they landed in central America and marched to Mexico.
>There were never more than 2,000 or 3,000 Spaniards in central America during the events of the book.
The events of the book happen in Mexico as well.
Because their fort and ports were in central America, describing the # of Spaniards in central America vs Mexico includes the people who guarded the fort and handled the logistical matters of the ports, and thus is more accurate if you want to describe all of them.
This is why you don't start semantic arguments
>99.99% were in Mexico and the rest in Central America!! therefore they were in Central America!!
?
Mexico is part of Central America you buffoon.
>end of native people
>more people with native blood living right now than at any point in history
What a weird way to end native people
The Aztecs were not a "tribe" lol
Everything he says is correct. Please save your moronic wasted comments for yourself.
I'm not the guy he was arguing with but the Aztecs were not a "tribe"
The Azteca, AND surrounding tribes.
You're a fricking moron don't ever reply to me again. That other guy is a moron too you two should be friends
What surrounding "tribes"?
Dunno or care about the names!
So you don't know what you're even talking about. Got it.
fricking moron
seethe
I dont see why I would need to know the names of tribes to know the levels of plumbing primitive peoples had
Because you have no clue what you were talking about. Just spouting ignorance.
So you are saying that these people had highly elaborate plumbing systems implemented? Weird how I have never seen these while walking around
fricking moron
seethe
fricking moron
your "civilisation" is oppression, that's the point, it's just a form of oppression that is easy to pass of as something good, a synonm. when you impose your civilisation on another culture you wipe out their own. you have no divine right to impose your norms and your preconcieved notions of good onto another society, which you reduce to "savages" because it is a way for you to get out of admitting that you just want to conquer those you percieve as lesser than you. it's cowardly israelite behavior to pretend that your homosexualy gay culture is somehow better and that you're helping people by wiping out their identity and forcing them to obey your homosexual european cultural norms.
>human sacrifice is true freedom, not being allowed to kill people at will is oppression
funny one, Paco
And anglos were worse than both
What?? No way, your telling me that real life isn’t just black and white and that things are actually more nuanced then that?
The Tlaxcala and other native tribes that sided with the Spaniards against the Aztects would disagree
>le enlightened centrist faec
Conquistadors were the invaders.
Aztecs invaded everyone else but when PoC euros do the same it is LE BAD
When you're stupid but not too stupid to get mad. Based moron.
Thought so
How is he wrong, moron?
You only care about whites doing anything bad but when your precious savages do something a hundred times worse then you don’t give a shit
You were taught in school and tv that whites are bad so you hate all whites, simple as
other amerindian tribes helped the spanish topple the aztecs because they were tired of their raping, pillaging and sacrifices.
they were not tribes but yes.
Conquistadors were helped by locals though. Because everyone hated the Aztecs
Aztecs literally invaded more territories than the conquistadors.
If anything, we were the liberators.
So were Aztecs, spanish were just better at it lmao. There's a reason why all local tribes immedeately started helping conqustadors - they fricking despised aztecs.
tbh conqustadors were c**ts still, they would call local leaders to negotation table, when the leader and his people would arrive they'd have a priest there and the priest would declare tribesman lying heretics, therefore there was no point in negotiations, then they'd pull their guns out and just fricking murder everyone.
Uhmmmmmmm EXCUEEEZE ME, chud, but actually it's been scientifically proven that they needed human blood to make the sun rise every day. Also, stay in your lane????
Aztec fricking shits
Bigot
yep, they basically murdered a peaceful tribe and just added their shit on their buildings.
Mayas are the cool ones, they basically were bros with people from Venus.
As if the situation would not have been far worse for the Spaniards and Europe in general if the power and technology levels had been reversed.
True, everyone hated the fricking Aztecs and we’re willing to help the Spanish to beat them.
No. The Tlazcaltecs were the traitors, aka the bad guys.
they were egypts equivalent in the new world, spaniards just came and fricked up the natural order
Aztecs were so fricking annoying other natives teamed up with the Spanish to take them out lol
>le bad guys
>he reduces life and its nuances down to a toddler tier moralhomosexual paradigm
american hands typed this post
Unironically, who cares that they were savage man-eaters? They only ate their own. Why does every group of "humans" need to be civilized by outsiders? Maybe if our moronic ancestors hadn't mixed with them, we could live in a society where no one mistakes brown tribal people for being equal to white people.
And at least they had a unique and fascinating culture back then. Now what do they have?
>Unironically, who cares that they were savage man-eaters?
The countless neighbouring tribes they kept raiding and enslaving. Who did most of the wiping out the aztecs stuff when the spaniards arrived, by the way.
And why is it Europe's responsibility, or even right to "save" them? Is it man's responsibility to save the gazelle of Africa from the terror that lions put them through? Should we go and kill all the polar bears because of what they do to seals?
The Aztecs upheld the natural order of their land. Being more advanced does not give you a right to disturb that natural order. And look what came of their interference. South America has never had a real culture since then.
The aztecs mostly sacrificed their neighbours, not their own.
The army that conquered them only had about 1-2% spanish guys in it and the rest were neighbours who were sick of being sacrificed.
>The aztecs mostly sacrificed their neighbours, not their own.
Let them. That was their natural inclination. They should be left to their own devices, no matter how "cruel or abhorrent" advanced humans may view them as. You don't disturb nature just because it's "evil"
Can you be a lolbert somewhere else?
Yeah and one day their neighbours had enough and overthrew them.
Thats basically what happened.
ok so...we already know he fails then.
Aztecs literally sacrificed people so much they waged war to capture more injuns to sacrifice, and they wore the skins of people they'd off. How the frick are they anything but villains?
Are they white? Exactly. They're not the villains.
You just don't get it, they were sacrificing people so that the gods could have enough power to fight off the end of the world!
santos basados
It's their culture, bigot
Because it’s Hollywood in 2022.
White = bad
Non-white = good
I love it so long as they record it all in Spanish for the former cultural imperialists and refuse to dub it into English for the current cultural imperialists
Why even bring Batman into this? Why not just make that same pitch and remove any mention of Batman. Why does Batman need to be everywhere all the time.
Nothing new, DC has been whoring out the batman IP ever since TDKR made people give a frick again
man of bats is kino
Batman of Argentina is pretty funny
What's with the cow?
Slapping Batman on it brings more viewers
They want the goodboy pr from being diverse and inclusive but also know nobody will give a shit unless it has a popular ip attached to it
If anything the batman tie-in will cripple it artistically.
I'm not sure what this has to do with Batman.
le epic historical fiction with capeshit flavoring.
These people have any idea how fricking brutal Aztecs were????
>NOOOOOO you can't just sacrifice my entire heckin village to huitzilopotchli we have basic human rightarinos that you WILL respect, chud! My body my choice, you can't just rip out my- ACK!
didn't the aztecs literally have human sacrifice? avenging your father is in line with the european view of death not the aztecs.
Sounds better than the Black person batman they are doing tbh
It wasn’t just the Spaniards killing the shit out of the Aztecs. The neighboring tribes helped the white invaders because the Aztecs were just that much of fricking bastards.
>tribes
Mesoamerica had urban state socities, not "tribes". Even the conquistadors like Cortés and Bernal Díaz and Spanish friars like Durán and Sahagún repeatedly made it a point to praise Mesoamerican cities, cleanliness, rule of law, and intelligence. You also see missionaries directly comparing them to Greeks and Romans in terms of being "civilized pagans"; in spite of sacrifices.
>heh bro that isn't the nomenclature I accept
God damn this board is pseud as frick
This sounds really cool tbh
>took non americans 5 years to realize don draper as america wasn't exactly the greatest of putdowns.
lel.
After he got fat and old, he really started looking like my dad.
What the frick are you talking about? That was always used by moronic Americans
I think you're confused about the how you're supposed to perceive the original image, anon
Spain won
he looks black.
I'm trying to think of something good to say about this but it just looks like it's gonna be awful. Why does it have to be a "batman", why don't you make a random hero character? Because then nobody would watch it, that's why
everything is so stupid now, when is Putin scheduled to nuke us? any way we can speed things up?
yea right after russia takes over ukraine
They don't want all of Ukraine, they wanted the majority Russian speaking parts in the East and to cripple Ukraine from ever becoming actually fortified by NATO. Which they're succeeding in immensely
They retreated, recalibrated their goals and rallied and so are doing better but they definitely wanted all of Ukraine.
No they didn't. Crazy how Russia has supposedly been retreating for over a month and a half now but are still in Ukraine..
>Still will have a no kill rule
GAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
This, and it’ll have some stupid message about how revenge is bad
What exactly is gay about a man dressed in tight spandex and a leather cowl and cape with several boy sidekicks getting physical with several other men in flamboyant costumes?
it's only gay if you receive
Based Roman.
the fact talia al'ghul had to rape him
Hollywood once again thinks everyone south of the border is Mexican. Frick shitcanos
>cannibals good
>conquistador bad
could be cool
>Aztec
If the Mexicans knew anything about their culture they would drop anything that calls them "Aztec"
They would but they're just so sleepy. So tired.
cartels worship a saint of dead , i don't think they care
I don't think this is aimed at cartels but ok
Everyone in Mexico is associated with one cartel or another
This is a weird thing to say
Why would Cartels bother with me.
If you happen to be kidnapped by the cartel don't mention Batman. Just saying.
I'll keep that in mind anon. Thanks
When the cartel starts nerding out about Batman you'll be begging them to cut your head off at that point.
That “saint” was made up by the CIA
Frick this garbage. We already had a Mexican batman.
>Not posting the real one
He was more like The Mexican Atom
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
MAKE SOMETHING NEW FOR FRICKS SAKE. THERE IS NO REASON THIS HAD TO BE BATMAN
FRICK
That's a bit ironic because I'm making a comic about a Spanish boy extracting revenge on the filthy infidel natives who killed his noble Conquistador father.
Name him Bruno Diaz, it fits better there
I never thought based Japan could disasterously misunderstand and ruin a western property before I saw this. Gouge your eyes out levels of terrible
I only saw the Jp dub of this . They make a better anime later
come on catwoman
SAMURAI BATMAN
AZTEC BATMAN
FEMINIST BRA BURNING BATMAN
HINDENBURG DISASTER BATMAN
Magnífico.
Batman is supposed to be the good guy. Why would he defend human sacrifice?
if batman is obsessed with justice in his aztec society wouldnt he be going around capturing neighboring tribes children to sacrifice to the sun god
no
minorities good
just make another zorro dumbasses
Who the frick is going to watch this?
I'm "latino" from south america and it looks like shit, not even my leftist anti eupean friends would watch that.
The cinematic slop must flow.
>Who the frick is going to watch this?
Homosexual israelites and self hating mutts
moronic.
So Mexicans are like Black folk in South Africa. I thought they valued their Spanish and Portuguese roots.
Who the frick cares if he's avenging for his dad or whatever, Aztecs are at war with conquistadors already. Its a last of the mohicans type shit rather than destroying spain
His costume better be made from the skins of human sacrifice
>aztecs
>good guys
lmfao do americans really??
If this shit was released ten years ago, no one would have batten an eye but now fricking politics infect everything
Ten years ago it would’ve been about the Mayans because of the 2012 Mayan doomsday prophecy.
>no live action Mayan Batman adaptation directed by Mel Gibson
I mourn.
Kek, you're right though the Mayans didn't fight conquistadors. They could have fought an Aztec esque civilization instead which would have been kino
The Mayans did fight Conquistadores. Pedro de Alvarado conquered a few kingdoms, and the last Mayan kingdom was conquered in 1697.
Jews stirring shit again?
Yes, but they forgot, in Aztlan, winners get sacrificed
Wouldn't it have been better if it were set in modern day Mexico? The country is basically a failed state. The cartels do what they want with impunity, the government's already lost control of 20% of the country and the current president has basically surrendered. Seems like a pretty good environment for a Batman.
What are liberals stance on this? Do they just make complaints about the cia?
>there wouldn’t be a drug trade if we Americans weren’t addicted
>the CIA did something decades ago
>you would be doing a heckin’ imperialism if you put a stop this
>Well all that violence is all the more reason to let them into OUR country!!!
Who knows they love the cia in some cases because of Brenan, also they refuse to admit border security is needed. Guns are almost illegal in Mexico and some guns from US get smuggled down there so they can't even admit security is needed to help another country or even human trafficking. Also remember how gay they got over a few billion and we just sent like 40b to Ukraine for no reason as all our costs are shooting through the roof? Yeah understanding liberals is an exercise in futility.
>Wouldn't it have been better if it were set in modern day Mexico? The country is basically a failed state
Now it makes sense why it takes place in america
>using the Las Vegas shooting for that
oof
they don't want to get butchered and eaten by cartels
brothers we don't know all that much about the aztecs and their atrocities but we are interested in reading about it
This would be kino if it was an orgy of territorial testosterone and bloody violence, but you just know the lead will be an effeminate whiner.
Ehh, too heavily armored for that aztec background. Keep the helm lose the armor and just wear feathered skirt and cape.
Paint the bat symbol in his chest with the blood of his fore bearer or something.
>DUDE AZTECS WERE GOOD GUYS
Seethe harder, Paco.
No normal Mexican thinks the Aztecs were the good guys. It's genuinely just ch*cano and american fantasy.
>aztec good guys
Lmao, battarangs of obsidian break against spanish steel
>We know Batman loses hard
Is this the only animation in where he loses super hard and doesn't achieve shit?
In DC universe Spaniards didn't conquer South America.
>encounters the spaniards
>gets shot
>the end
>Batman Choque de Imperios
Why are they using the language of their masters? that's admitting defeat
Aztecs were human sacrificing shits it's no wonder Hollywood hbo israelite types feel an affinity towards that sort of content
I like Aztecs. I'm going to give this a watch. Hopefully it's not too political, a well animated film about revenge and Conquistadors is all I want.
Fricking this. Just portray them for what they were–warmongering empires clashing in a battle for supremacy. Obviously, there'll be some bias since the story takes place from Batman's POV, but they better also show the Aztecs conquering and sacking other cities, and the high priests performing sacrifices and keeping slaves.
Sounds pretty political but yeah could be cool if you go in knowing that.
Finally a LATINX Batman
Does he eat nachos?
>not knowing about Batman Inc
>not knowing that there are canonically Japanese, Chinese, Native American, etc Batmen.
Do you people actually read comics or do you just complain about things you know nothing about?
You can't just use that picture and not explain THE COW
It's Bat-cow
But how?
And a construction worker batman, policeman batman, fireman batman, biker batman, and army batman
Boba Fett Batman?
They always ignore the fact that the Spaniards had little to do with why the Aztecs were wiped out.
Yo onions la noche.
Spaniards were the good guys, so this confirms that Batman is a villain
cringe shit, but unfortunately the precedent was set with the steaming pile of crap that was Batman Ninja
>every non USA, non Canadian country in the American continent is aztc tacos ayy carambaa
So fricking racist.
I can't wait for Columbus to do cartoonishly horrible shit only for the bat themed avenger from the blood sacrifice practicing culture to just throw him in jail, and then for him to break free and do it all over again.
Wow I can actually put to good use those nahuatl classes I took.
NEHUA IN YOALLI
(I am the night)
based but nahuatl is dying and no one will speak it 20 years from now
Is it gonna be lore accurate and is he gonna be ripping the hearts out of captured slave tribes to win the favour of the gods?
but spaniards succeeded raping their dna off the map
Not in the DC universe, in there Spain never discovered America or even conquer the South. Batman Azteca defeated them
>Aztec
>Mayan facewear
>shitty headdress
>all black, no flashy design, to keep with le batman aesthetic
why can't the californios get it right damn it its not like there isn't highly detailed sources to pull from
they think we were the same thing
This is just Zorro.
but sounds cool
>copia de una copia
>Turn a cool costume into a crappy gay one
Same as his character, went from stoic and serious to another memester comic relief
The spanish did nothing wrong.
They didn't wipe out the American natives when they had the chance. Now we're stuck with DBZ obsessed hispanics and whiney "first nation" people.
EL batman eats Robins heart to gain super powers
>inb4 a sympathetic black spaniard helps Aztec Batman fight his white (ish) oppressors
batman is so fricking gay I'm so sick of that homosexual
El Bromas
>*blocks your path*
viral fan art spawning official material is weird
reminds me of those horror movies that were funded because of viral short youtube videos
>L-Literally white genocide!
I'd actually watch this if it was about an Aztec batman in Aztec society. Using batman to b***h about conquistadors is pathetic and instantly I lose all interest
Why not create an Aztec character. Lazy fricks
They created an Aztec character. The name's Youalli Coatl ("nigh serpent").
Córrele wey ahi viene el Batman Blanco
They had an opportunity to create a unique hero, but just co-opted an existing one instead.
Spain is always saying to Latin America: "We brought you civilization" as if they wanted back.
And they actually need some civilization since it's a cultural shithole compared to Latin America.
😐
ah, the vibrant culture of drug cartels running the country.
lmao cope
is it really so difficult to make new characters? deviant art does it all the time
I wonder if they'll touch on how the Aztecs enslaved the surrounding tribes for human sacrifice
Wait, it was the surrounding tribes? I thought it was people in general. So it was a war thing, lol.
el hombre de bat y gohan blanco linked up
Lo siento Batman, los españoles ganaron.
conquistadors got off the boat and walked into a horror film with human sacrifice, child torture and blood worship everywhere. they did nothing wrong.
will he get married to an ally tribe princess then kill her and wear her skin when he meets her father again?
>is Aztec
>speaks Spanish
>doesn't speak Nahua
???
Basado y rojopastillado.
>WOOF WOOF
>The mastiffs, which could weigh as much as 250 pounds and stand three feet high at the shoulder, were brute attackers, while the greyhounds were speedy and made lightning-quick strikes, often trying to disembowel their opponent. In May 1494 the Jamaican natives did not look friendly, so Columbus ordered an attack. One war dog caused absolute terror, so Columbus in his journal wrote that one dog was worth 10 soldiers against Indians. During the Haiti campaign, opposed by a huge native force, all 20 dogs fought at the Battle of Vega Real in March 1495. Alonso de Ojeda, who had fought with them against the Moors, commanded the dogs. He released the dogs shouting, “Tomalos!” (basically, “Sic ’em!”). An observer said that in one hour, each dog had torn apart at least a hundred natives. The island was taken largely by terror of the dogs.
>The Aztecs had dogs. They were small, hairless, timid creatures, related to the modern Chihuahua, which were reared not as pets but as a food source. Accordingly when the Aztecs first met the Spanish war dogs – wolfhounds, greyhounds, lurchers, pit bulls and gigantic mastiffs similar to modern Rottweilers, they had absolutely no idea what they were dealing with. Indeed they did not think these animals were dogs at all. They thought they might be some species of dragon – an impression compounded by the fact that the Spanish dogs were armored in chainmail and steel plate like their masters and were thus almost invulnerable to stone weapons. Fasted before battle so they were in a state of voracious, slavering hunger, trained to fight and kill with the utmost ferocity, these terrifying animals already relished human flesh having been used repeatedly in acts of genocide against the Indians of Hispaniola and Cuba. Unleashed in snarling, baying packs, their tongues lolling, drool dripping from their fangs and sparks of fire seeming – in the imagination of the victims – to flash from their eyes, they tore into the Aztec front lines with devastating effect, disemboweling men, ripping out their throats, feasting on their soft, unarmored bodies. “They have flat ears and are spotted like ocelots,” reported one Aztec eyewitness of the Spanish war dogs. “They have great dragging jowls and fangs like daggers and blazing eyes of burning yellow that flash fire and shoot off sparks. Their bellies are gaunt, their flanks long and lean with the ribs showing. They are tireless and very powerful. They bound here and there, panting, their tongues dripping venom.”
>The names of many of these dogs so esteemed by the Spaniards still live on and here are but a few:
>Bercerruillo the terror of Borinquen, until he was fallen by 50 arrows, received a salary one and a half times that of an archer from his owner Ponce de Leon.
>Leoncillo (Little Lion), Bercerruillo’s son, was Balboa’s warrior, earned over 500 gold pesos in booty during his many campaigns, and he was the first Western dog to see the Pacific. When ordered to catch a native he would grab the man’s arm in his mouth. If the man came along quietly, they walked slowly to Balboa. If there was any resistance, the dog ripped him apart.
>Bruto, De Soto’s champion, received 20 slaves as spoils before his career ended.
heccin best boys
Sounds cool, it's like Batman Ninja.
this adaptation would´ve been better
>spanish invaders
this is gonna be woke garbage, i fully expect Batmanuel to be cucked by some strong catwoman type character halfway into this show
>invading european men good
>natives protecting their land bad
Is this thread just a /misc/psyop? Where are all these anti-aztec posters coming from?
The natives protecting their land sided with the spaniards you absolute brain cramp.