i agree with the sentiment
im no writer but seem s a little verbose, probably could have parred it down a bit. also not sure if he he positivist in the right context
I'd have a reason to respect your opinion if you didn't type like an ESL. I imagine you're a third worlder, thus your opinion holds no merit. Get off the internet and have six children with some 4/10 woman named Bhavini.
While very entertaining, the movie was about as deep as a soap opera.
Just as bad as DDL's acting. Never criticize movies that got Oscars. They're objectively good like DDL's acting. Otherwise you have to admit that DDL can't act.
I mean this with all sincerity: Why are you on Cinemaphile if you don't know anything about film or television? Please go to a different board that aligns with your hobbies and interests.
I understand absolutely every word he said but the sentence itself is all gibberish. Absolutely nothing of substance was said, even by the standards of a tweet. Basically >you shouldn't like this movie because... you just SHOULDN'T, okay?
The movie doesnt challenge shitty behavior it acts like encouragement solves problems instead of making them bigger and presents this as ethical and moral.
>What's a positivist jamboree with the pacifying succor of pert little morals?
Happy circle jerk which is validated by vain basic b***h morals.
I'm interpreting "pert little", which I think is redundant, as not well thought out and vain.
Anyway the post is trying too hard to sound intelligent imo and he's just crying about people liking something which is positive in nature which is absurd. These two points clearly show he's a moron as far as I'm concerned, regardless of the content of the film.
it's not a positive jamboree with a pacifying succor of pert little morals. it's a positive jamboree with a pacifying succor of pert little morals lying in wait.
there's an em dash that interrupts the flow of the clause, and you morons are too stupid to hold it in memory lol.
you talk like the guy in OP's pic attached is some masterful prose stylist when it's just the kind of perfunctory humanities-speak usually employed by midwits who spend too much time reading poorly written academic theses. there's an implicit ethos in his little screed, the ethos implicit in numberless doctoral dissertations being penned right now by people too incompetent to get a real career. the ethos according to which "phallogocentric" morality (i.e. sanity) should be "challenged" at every opportunity, according to which all things once revered must now be endlessly "queered" and "deconstructed". it's a large scale anti-civilizational psyop.
Explain what the difference is and say all of that with simpler terms. Go ahead. moron. I accept your concession, because you failed to do it in the first place. Looks like you can barely read and understand my post which uses very simple English words.
How about you read what I was replying to, first of all. Now, tell me how that modifies the sentence radically. You won't because it doesn't. It only further disparages the enjoying viewer.
leftist gay with academese-poisoned brain sneers at fun middlebrow movie for not being avant-garde enough and espousing universal, family-friendly morals. the kind of homosexual who hails godard and pasolini as brilliant auteurs because their whole thing was sticking it to the bourgeoisie and thinks reading hegel and deleuze makes him a genius. the kind of guy who thinks a movie not being clever enough and being liked by normies means the movie is intrinsically evil. that whole theodor adorno mass culture reinforcing capitalism shit. reminds me of a college teacher who would keep showing us godawful latin american films and praising them like we were watching bergman or fellini because the movies were "non-commercial"
Like the majority of the movie doesn't even fit that, is the dude having his wordy whine just because it's conclusion is a happy ending where people work their shit out?
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Everything Everywhere All at Once. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's
also Joy's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into her characterization- her personal philosophy draws heavily from
Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly
appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a
consequence people who dislike Everything Everywhere All at Once truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't
appreciate, for instance, the humor in Joy's existential monologue as a sentient rock, which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons
scratching their heads in confusion as Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert's genius wit unfolds itself on their cinema screens.
What fools.. how I pity them.
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Everything Everywhere All at Once tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower)
I multiverse like I multiverse my entire multiverse just so that I could multiverse Multiverse Everywhere All The Goddamn Multiverse. This is multiverse the best multiverse I have ever sucked in my entire multiverse. This is the only multiverse I have ever gargled the shaft of that made me cry. Most recommended multiverse I can ever multiverse to multiverse. I simply cannot fathom every choking down another gallon of processed semen without this multiverse being pumped through my orbital cavities on loop 24/7/365 and subsequently multiversing it out of my multiverse butthole across all corners of the multiverse. I multiverses it as far down my throat as I could, I wanted to multiverse it all but it was just too big of a multiverse and I gagged all over multiverse. A24 slapped the back of my head and said if I didn’t multiverse it all the way down I wouldn’t get any more multiverse so I had to be a good cum container and gobble gobble love love that multiverse with every ounce of my multiverse yummy yummy you just don’t understand the complexity of the best multiverse you’re just contrarian cope filtered dilate muh muh muh muh muh muh muh I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over with my ass
It wasn't exactly a stellar year of cinema (Top Gun and *Avatar* also nominated?) and maybe two out of the last ten winners have been actually memorable good movies.
i want to frick one of the lesbians forget which one though
i agree with the sentiment
im no writer but seem s a little verbose, probably could have parred it down a bit. also not sure if he he positivist in the right context
I'd have a reason to respect your opinion if you didn't type like an ESL. I imagine you're a third worlder, thus your opinion holds no merit. Get off the internet and have six children with some 4/10 woman named Bhavini.
Go tell him that on Twitter
>words words words words
Yeah, that movie was awful.
Just as bad as DDL's acting. Never criticize movies that got Oscars. They're objectively good like DDL's acting. Otherwise you have to admit that DDL can't act.
>DDL's
Who?
I mean this with all sincerity: Why are you on Cinemaphile if you don't know anything about film or television? Please go to a different board that aligns with your hobbies and interests.
Dick Ducking Lips, it's a black male thing.
direct downloads
While very entertaining, the movie was about as deep as a soap opera.
He's right but he sounds like an butthole.
at this rate people are going to start buying ads for their own twitter posts
Nice book words you got there, dick. Did you learn them from a Tyrannosaurus?
>IS THAT A PLEASANT MOVIE WITH FUNNY, HAPPY CHARACTERS!?
>I'M GOING INSAAAAAAANE!!
You neither watched the movie nor understand whats been said in OPs post.
in english, doc
I understand absolutely every word he said but the sentence itself is all gibberish. Absolutely nothing of substance was said, even by the standards of a tweet. Basically
>you shouldn't like this movie because... you just SHOULDN'T, okay?
English isnt even my first language and i understand it just fine.
Rewrite it using simpler words then
You too.
What's a positivist jamboree with the pacifying succor of pert little morals?
The movie doesnt challenge shitty behavior it acts like encouragement solves problems instead of making them bigger and presents this as ethical and moral.
>What's a positivist jamboree with the pacifying succor of pert little morals?
Happy circle jerk which is validated by vain basic b***h morals.
I'm interpreting "pert little", which I think is redundant, as not well thought out and vain.
Anyway the post is trying too hard to sound intelligent imo and he's just crying about people liking something which is positive in nature which is absurd. These two points clearly show he's a moron as far as I'm concerned, regardless of the content of the film.
it's not a positive jamboree with a pacifying succor of pert little morals. it's a positive jamboree with a pacifying succor of pert little morals lying in wait.
there's an em dash that interrupts the flow of the clause, and you morons are too stupid to hold it in memory lol.
It's a positive jamboree full of degenerate buttplug humor.
it puts the jam in jamboree
you talk like the guy in OP's pic attached is some masterful prose stylist when it's just the kind of perfunctory humanities-speak usually employed by midwits who spend too much time reading poorly written academic theses. there's an implicit ethos in his little screed, the ethos implicit in numberless doctoral dissertations being penned right now by people too incompetent to get a real career. the ethos according to which "phallogocentric" morality (i.e. sanity) should be "challenged" at every opportunity, according to which all things once revered must now be endlessly "queered" and "deconstructed". it's a large scale anti-civilizational psyop.
Explain what the difference is and say all of that with simpler terms. Go ahead. moron. I accept your concession, because you failed to do it in the first place. Looks like you can barely read and understand my post which uses very simple English words.
How about you read what I was replying to, first of all. Now, tell me how that modifies the sentence radically. You won't because it doesn't. It only further disparages the enjoying viewer.
I understand it, there is just no substance to it.
Wouldn't be surprised.
It's Armond White's throwaway Twitter account, he loves using smart sounding words from his dictionary.
This shit is always just seething at something standing for things they don't personally like
leftist gay with academese-poisoned brain sneers at fun middlebrow movie for not being avant-garde enough and espousing universal, family-friendly morals. the kind of homosexual who hails godard and pasolini as brilliant auteurs because their whole thing was sticking it to the bourgeoisie and thinks reading hegel and deleuze makes him a genius. the kind of guy who thinks a movie not being clever enough and being liked by normies means the movie is intrinsically evil. that whole theodor adorno mass culture reinforcing capitalism shit. reminds me of a college teacher who would keep showing us godawful latin american films and praising them like we were watching bergman or fellini because the movies were "non-commercial"
lmao that wasn't posted by a leftist
are you sure?
That tweet is specifically shitting on leftists.
this is what happens when people who think they're smart are afraid of using colloquialisms like 'slop'. he's right, that gay movie is slop.
ok reddit
that's mr reddit too u
like a Jordan Peterson tweet minus the cultural marxism stuff
>look everyone I found a thesaurus
So many words to say so little
Personally, I didn’t like it because I thought it was gay and sucked.
That's pretty damn based, only more based thing would've been
>I didn't see it cause I'm sure it's gay and sucked
If the lel so randumb copypasta penguin of doom was a movie script it would be EEAaO.
What the frick is that meant to mean
Like the majority of the movie doesn't even fit that, is the dude having his wordy whine just because it's conclusion is a happy ending where people work their shit out?
it's good for art to do that when it upholds white male supremacy.
>getting filtered by entry level pop cinema
wtf? kek
>positivist jamboree
huh
If I never see a movie about a spunky Chinese girl hating on her tiger mom again, I think I'll be okay. What an odd trend.
Why is it censored?
Yt bois... we got too wienery. Our high IQ, a mirage again.
Both are just one autist who used ai to make twitter profile pics by the way.
>to be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Beethoven
To be fair, you have to have a very high IQ to understand Everything Everywhere All at Once. The humor is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. There's
also Joy's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into her characterization- her personal philosophy draws heavily from
Narodnaya Volya literature, for instance. The fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly
appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realize that they're not just funny- they say something deep about LIFE. As a
consequence people who dislike Everything Everywhere All at Once truly ARE idiots- of course they wouldn't
appreciate, for instance, the humor in Joy's existential monologue as a sentient rock, which itself is a cryptic reference to Turgenev's Russian epic Fathers and Sons. I'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons
scratching their heads in confusion as Daniel Kwan and Daniel Scheinert's genius wit unfolds itself on their cinema screens.
What fools.. how I pity them.
And yes, by the way, i DO have a Everything Everywhere All at Once tattoo. And no, you cannot see it. It's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 IQ points of my own (preferably lower)
Those twitter gays sure love to talk a lot while saying absolutely nothing.
The message of EEAaO is to be kind. That might be very powerful or very pathetic depending on your personality.
I multiverse like I multiverse my entire multiverse just so that I could multiverse Multiverse Everywhere All The Goddamn Multiverse. This is multiverse the best multiverse I have ever sucked in my entire multiverse. This is the only multiverse I have ever gargled the shaft of that made me cry. Most recommended multiverse I can ever multiverse to multiverse. I simply cannot fathom every choking down another gallon of processed semen without this multiverse being pumped through my orbital cavities on loop 24/7/365 and subsequently multiversing it out of my multiverse butthole across all corners of the multiverse. I multiverses it as far down my throat as I could, I wanted to multiverse it all but it was just too big of a multiverse and I gagged all over multiverse. A24 slapped the back of my head and said if I didn’t multiverse it all the way down I wouldn’t get any more multiverse so I had to be a good cum container and gobble gobble love love that multiverse with every ounce of my multiverse yummy yummy you just don’t understand the complexity of the best multiverse you’re just contrarian cope filtered dilate muh muh muh muh muh muh muh I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over I shit on bagel and spread it all over with my ass
>but I like other movies when it panders to me
He's right but Tyrone here is an awful writer.
We understand just fine you moron. You're either being dense on purpose or you're literally too stupid to argue with.
Why did you censor Armond White's name
Still can't believe this won best picture. One the few movies I know if you liked it then you have shit taste in films
It wasn't exactly a stellar year of cinema (Top Gun and *Avatar* also nominated?) and maybe two out of the last ten winners have been actually memorable good movies.
Idiot Nihilist: "There's no meaning to life, but you can choose what is meaningful!"
"Wouldn't saying that your choice is meaningful inherently mean that your choice has meaning despite nothing having meaning?"
Idiot Nihilist: "Uhhhhh......."