What the SC says: >if you hire christopher to come watch the sopranos with you, he can refuse
What it doesn't say: >he can forbid you from watching it in your own home
>What the SC says: >if you hire christopher to come watch the sopranos with you, he can refuse
Is that even correct? I thought that he can refuse to make speech that he doesn't agree with. Watching TV with someone isn't creating speech.
>yet another grandstanding moron doesn't know how to read a decision
it's all so tiresome.
>Is that even correct?
No. The decision ruled that if Imperioli had a Cameoesque business where he charged $XX to read a script on camera that you sent him, he could not be compelled to accept your money and read your script if it conflicted with a deeply held belief. If he were selling Sopranos related merch, he still could not discriminate and refuse to sell to someone in a maga hat, or someone who was black or someone with a tattoo he didn't like. This case narrowly concerns speech compelled through a business transaction when that speech comes in conflict with a religious or core ideological belief of the seller.
>be me >spend the day chudposting on FourChannel.com >"time to unwind after a busy day with some The Sopranos" >load up my pirated collection of the series >Suddenly hear the window shatter behind me as someone violently leaps through it >its Michael Imperioli >"Whassa matta you thought i wouldn't find out?" >Arrested and sent to jail >Raped by moulies until im more cum than man
>You can't just "move" to Canada
tell that to the hordes of indians and chinks in vancouver. i find it hilarious how difficult it is for americans to move there
This is totally moronic btw. All this decision does is let other people (actual working class people) discriminate the same way actors like Michael do. Imagine if he was forced to act in a movie that portrayed someone he hates in a positive light. If his reading was correct, it would be like trying to prevent a gay person from accessing your website.
Can the rights holders of Sopranos and Goodfellas sue him for damages for making a statement like this?
If I got online and said gay people weren't allowed to eat at my place of employment (McDonald's) I'm pretty sure I could be sued for damages.
>but being a literal who, they'd have virtually no case to claim you had any kinda influence on anybody.
I'm actually very well known and respected in my local community.
>"aww hell yeah! frick those homos! they aint comin in any of my stores! discrimination rocks!!!! jesus wouldn't let them buy a cake and neither would i!!!! >... >"ohhh noooo.... how can he discriminate against me!!! nobody is treated more unfairly than me!!!!"
ill never understand the right mind. its like they are spoiled children incapable of thinking beyond their immediate feelings and needs
You don't understand the law or these cases.
A shop owned cannot refuse to serve someone for being gay. But they can chose not to make something that goes against their beliefs. A gay couple can walk into a shop and buy a cake for their wedding, but they cannot compel someone to make a cake with a rainbow flag on it. Same goes for the recent website case. You cannot compel someone to make a pro-gay website of it goes against their beliefs.
It's the same as me going into a black owned bakery and asking them to make me a cake with a burning cross on it. They don't have to do it, even though there are no hate speech laws in the US. But an Indian convenience store owner can't refuse me service because I am part of an anti-immigration political group.
The distinction is so obvious yet lefties chose to remain willfully ignorant of it in order to score political points. Sad.
You don't understand the law or these cases.
A shop owned cannot refuse to serve someone for being gay. But they can chose not to make something that goes against their beliefs. A gay couple can walk into a shop and buy a cake for their wedding, but they cannot compel someone to make a cake with a rainbow flag on it. Same goes for the recent website case. You cannot compel someone to make a pro-gay website of it goes against their beliefs.
It's the same as me going into a black owned bakery and asking them to make me a cake with a burning cross on it. They don't have to do it, even though there are no hate speech laws in the US. But an Indian convenience store owner can't refuse me service because I am part of an anti-immigration political group.
The distinction is so obvious yet lefties chose to remain willfully ignorant of it in order to score political points. Sad.
Is there a law that lets anon refuse to be BTFO? Cuz I think a BTFO just took place.
You don't understand the law or these cases.
A shop owned cannot refuse to serve someone for being gay. But they can chose not to make something that goes against their beliefs. A gay couple can walk into a shop and buy a cake for their wedding, but they cannot compel someone to make a cake with a rainbow flag on it. Same goes for the recent website case. You cannot compel someone to make a pro-gay website of it goes against their beliefs.
It's the same as me going into a black owned bakery and asking them to make me a cake with a burning cross on it. They don't have to do it, even though there are no hate speech laws in the US. But an Indian convenience store owner can't refuse me service because I am part of an anti-immigration political group.
The distinction is so obvious yet lefties chose to remain willfully ignorant of it in order to score political points. Sad.
Day after day ,I learn the importance of separating the work of the artist. Little Stevie is the same stripe of delusional leftist shitheel that Michael is, maybe less so because Michael is actually above average IQ. Nonetheless, Sopranos remains to be the best thing he's ever been on and likely will ever be. And I'm not gonna stop watching on his account
They had a zoom reunion meeting during covid. When Chrissie said he wasn't addicted to alcohol anymore, Adrianna said "yeah now he's only addicted to Cinemaphile". And very awkward silence ensued
They had a zoom reunion meeting during covid. When Chrissie said he wasn't addicted to alcohol anymore, Adrianna said "yeah now he's only addicted to Cinemaphile". And very awkward silence ensued
look at their faces when she said that. kevin smith, steve buscemi, meadow and carmella almost laughed. the rest either didnt know what Cinemaphile is or have good poker faces
You weren't kidding that was heaps awkward. If he had laughed it off I would have assumed she was just using Cinemaphile to make a joke that "now he's addicted to weird internet stuff" but the awkward silence makes me feel there was truth to it.
Boomer youtubers referencing Cinemaphile during the 2016 election brought in a fricking avalanche of boomers and many of them never left. It was like our 9/11 in terms of very a distinct before and after
They had a zoom reunion meeting during covid. When Chrissie said he wasn't addicted to alcohol anymore, Adrianna said "yeah now he's only addicted to Cinemaphile". And very awkward silence ensued
They're reading from a meme script
aren't they reading from a script?
Yes
No it just seems that way because Melfi seems severely autistic
>you cannot watch this show about bigots and homophobes who love to discriminate because you don't want to bake the gay cake reeee
what is his problem?
What is even going on with these people. It's like saying ''I'm gonna use my infinity gauntlet to HECKIN PUNCH PUTLER RIGHT NOW''. Leftism is a mental disorder.
>create a work that glamorizes X >make sure to make you care for X >make sure you find X funny >make sure that the violent part of X is amusing and talked about a lot >make sure you blur the line of whether you could try to emulate X or find it appalling
>no no no, you're supposed to HATE X, that was the point
David Chase is unironically a complete moron and hack who got lucky. He never understood what people enjoyed about the show and regularly seethed about people liking the characters. The Many Saints of Newark was the result when he didn't have enough tard wranglers around him any more to keep him in check.
clips on youtube posted by fan channels
they killed vito for being less of a homosexual than this
Damn was gonna watch goodfellas tonight too
Do people here really believe that The Sopranos is supposed to be "le based and redpilled"?
they have pillowbiters in the army now
very accurate representation of israelites despite being produced in America
It’s a very israelited and anti-white show. Proto-woke slop.
Breaking Bad, on the other hand, is actually redpilled.
>his work
b***h you're just an actor, a glorified prop
Goodfellas. Also don't want me to shoot you in the other foot then give me my goddamn drink, Spider!
do women find him handsome or ugly?
What the SC says:
>if you hire christopher to come watch the sopranos with you, he can refuse
What it doesn't say:
>he can forbid you from watching it in your own home
>What the SC says:
>if you hire christopher to come watch the sopranos with you, he can refuse
Is that even correct? I thought that he can refuse to make speech that he doesn't agree with. Watching TV with someone isn't creating speech.
>yet another grandstanding moron doesn't know how to read a decision
it's all so tiresome.
>Is that even correct?
No. The decision ruled that if Imperioli had a Cameoesque business where he charged $XX to read a script on camera that you sent him, he could not be compelled to accept your money and read your script if it conflicted with a deeply held belief. If he were selling Sopranos related merch, he still could not discriminate and refuse to sell to someone in a maga hat, or someone who was black or someone with a tattoo he didn't like. This case narrowly concerns speech compelled through a business transaction when that speech comes in conflict with a religious or core ideological belief of the seller.
Wasn't the old rules way more of an example of being allowed to discriminate?
gee another leftie with no understanding of the law how surprising
Isn't that also bigotry?
>be me
>spend the day chudposting on FourChannel.com
>"time to unwind after a busy day with some The Sopranos"
>load up my pirated collection of the series
>Suddenly hear the window shatter behind me as someone violently leaps through it
>its Michael Imperioli
>"Whassa matta you thought i wouldn't find out?"
>Arrested and sent to jail
>Raped by moulies until im more cum than man
>want compromise?
>how's this
>20 days in the can
>i wanted 4K Dolby ATMOS Blu-rays
>i compromised
>i watched theatre camrips from the phillipines
The Left sure does love it's empty threats, doesn't it?
Remember how many celebrities promised to move to Canada if Trump got elected. We're still waiting.
You can't just "move" to Canada, and also frick off were full
>You can't just "move" to Canada,
Unless you're Chinese or a third-world "refugee".
>and also frick off were full
Sorry Round Eyes, we're coming and buying up all your homes.
Lol, it's always so sad when Canadians act like they're better than Americans
it is that easy if you're a millionaire celebrity
>You can't just "move" to Canada
tell that to the hordes of indians and chinks in vancouver. i find it hilarious how difficult it is for americans to move there
Once in a while an utterly who gives a shit b-tier actor tries to posture and clout chase and gets publicly ridiculed for it.
why doesn't he just die at this point? he would get more attention.
Oz, Breaking Bad, Star Trek TOS etc, I'll keep whatching everything I think is good
bunch of frickin crybabies spamming the board with Chrissy the past few days. no better than twitter with the constant pissin and moanin
I BEEN TOTALLY FRICKIN OSTRAFIED
This is totally moronic btw. All this decision does is let other people (actual working class people) discriminate the same way actors like Michael do. Imagine if he was forced to act in a movie that portrayed someone he hates in a positive light. If his reading was correct, it would be like trying to prevent a gay person from accessing your website.
And people call Steve Schirrpa a moron
Can the rights holders of Sopranos and Goodfellas sue him for damages for making a statement like this?
If I got online and said gay people weren't allowed to eat at my place of employment (McDonald's) I'm pretty sure I could be sued for damages.
>Can the rights holders of Sopranos and Goodfellas sue him for damages for making a statement like this?
In America, you can try suing anyone for anything. Winning on the other hand, is another story.
>If I got online and said gay people weren't allowed to eat at my place of employment (McDonald's) I'm pretty sure I could be sued for damages.
No, McDonalds could fire you but being a literal who, they'd have virtually no case to claim you had any kinda influence on anybody.
>but being a literal who, they'd have virtually no case to claim you had any kinda influence on anybody.
I'm actually very well known and respected in my local community.
Isn't Michael Imperioli's son a troony?
kek, chudcels have been in full damage control since this dropped
>"aww hell yeah! frick those homos! they aint comin in any of my stores! discrimination rocks!!!! jesus wouldn't let them buy a cake and neither would i!!!!
>...
>"ohhh noooo.... how can he discriminate against me!!! nobody is treated more unfairly than me!!!!"
ill never understand the right mind. its like they are spoiled children incapable of thinking beyond their immediate feelings and needs
You don't understand the law or these cases.
A shop owned cannot refuse to serve someone for being gay. But they can chose not to make something that goes against their beliefs. A gay couple can walk into a shop and buy a cake for their wedding, but they cannot compel someone to make a cake with a rainbow flag on it. Same goes for the recent website case. You cannot compel someone to make a pro-gay website of it goes against their beliefs.
It's the same as me going into a black owned bakery and asking them to make me a cake with a burning cross on it. They don't have to do it, even though there are no hate speech laws in the US. But an Indian convenience store owner can't refuse me service because I am part of an anti-immigration political group.
The distinction is so obvious yet lefties chose to remain willfully ignorant of it in order to score political points. Sad.
My belief is that you talk like a gay and my god says to not tolerate gays so get the hell off my web site
>my god
No Christian says "my god". You're a larping leftist and don't belong here. Try reddit.
Being part of a political group isn’t a protected class and they could very well refuse you service for that.
Is there a law that lets anon refuse to be BTFO? Cuz I think a BTFO just took place.
*mic drop*
I thought Sopranos was kinda ok, except his scenes which were mostly bad.
Day after day ,I learn the importance of separating the work of the artist. Little Stevie is the same stripe of delusional leftist shitheel that Michael is, maybe less so because Michael is actually above average IQ. Nonetheless, Sopranos remains to be the best thing he's ever been on and likely will ever be. And I'm not gonna stop watching on his account
Does anyone really care what he says? I don’t even remember him
Remember how Adrianna said that he was a Cinemaphile addict? And it turned out that it was /misc/ he was on
It's pure deflection on his part. Like how every outspoken male feminist turns out to be a rapist
I don't remember this at all
They had a zoom reunion meeting during covid. When Chrissie said he wasn't addicted to alcohol anymore, Adrianna said "yeah now he's only addicted to Cinemaphile". And very awkward silence ensued
how would she know, why would she blurt that out expecting anyone to understand what she is talking about
look at their faces when she said that. kevin smith, steve buscemi, meadow and carmella almost laughed. the rest either didnt know what Cinemaphile is or have good poker faces
I suppose after 2016 we are well known, quite a few celebrities must have browsed Cinemaphile at this point
>tfw Jamie Lynn Sigler read your Anne Frank fantasies about her
oh god
You weren't kidding that was heaps awkward. If he had laughed it off I would have assumed she was just using Cinemaphile to make a joke that "now he's addicted to weird internet stuff" but the awkward silence makes me feel there was truth to it.
aren't they reading from a script?
No it just seems that way because Melfi seems severely autistic
>boomers on Cinemaphile
Shit is fricking weird
Imagine your dad browsing this site
Boomer youtubers referencing Cinemaphile during the 2016 election brought in a fricking avalanche of boomers and many of them never left. It was like our 9/11 in terms of very a distinct before and after
They're reading from a meme script
Yes
no
>I played the moron in goodfellas, the moron in sopranos and haven't done much since, and it turns out I'm a moron IRL too
welp
What work?
>torrent entire imdb page
>play simultaneously on loop across 10 screens while yelling pedophile statistics to myself
who else DAMAGED?
entire imdb page
what does that mean?
>you cannot watch this show about bigots and homophobes who love to discriminate because you don't want to bake the gay cake reeee
what is his problem?
>Michael Imperioli is coping and seething
You love to see it
Liberals keep saying things like this as if they haven't been discriminating against "bigots and homophobes" for at least the last decade.
What is even going on with these people. It's like saying ''I'm gonna use my infinity gauntlet to HECKIN PUNCH PUTLER RIGHT NOW''. Leftism is a mental disorder.
>create a work that glamorizes X
>make sure to make you care for X
>make sure you find X funny
>make sure that the violent part of X is amusing and talked about a lot
>make sure you blur the line of whether you could try to emulate X or find it appalling
>no no no, you're supposed to HATE X, that was the point
David Chase is unironically a complete moron and hack who got lucky. He never understood what people enjoyed about the show and regularly seethed about people liking the characters. The Many Saints of Newark was the result when he didn't have enough tard wranglers around him any more to keep him in check.
its like they are spoiled children incapable of thinking beyond their immediate feelings and needs
Weird that someone who doesn't like discrimination would immediately jump to discriminating against those he doesn't like.
hahaha watch out
don't have a nice day, geriatric
Wopmutt acting like he didn't write the worst episode on the show
shut the frick up spider, and GET ME A DRINK
...Italian (and every other type) gangsters were racist as frick though