Scorsese’s overtly religious films are his best, his gangster ones are just excessively hyped due to men being really insecure about their masculinity.
I'm detecting an undercurrent of salt about anglos in Scorcese's movies, like he's annoyed that they don't just let immigrants be criminal pieces of shit so he has them be just as bad if not worse.
I enjoyed the setting and the period attire/accents. The whole "racism is LE BAD" thing rings hollow though, since his own story undermines that concept on-screen. The Irish being force-conscripted right off the boat to go fight the Confederacy because the Union was losing at that point, and then people rioting because the war had nothing to do with them, killing blacks in the process, are both portrayed as bad. So what are you supposed to get from this? That the Irish shouldn't have been force-conscripted, meaning the Union would lose, but the population should also shut the frick up and march to war anyway? Then you have the gang fights, which echoes modern calls for "diversity, equity, and inclusion". If the people you're not supposed to mind existing in your neighborhood are openly killing people out in the streets, doesn't that just prove they shouldn't be around?
It's a contradictory mess of a film, but still fun.
Scorsese wanted to make a point about how all these conflicts have no meaning eventually but by doing so he invalidated the whole premise and got lost into whatever he wanted to do. Should've just ignored the big picture.
>Scorsese wanted to make a point about how all these conflicts have no meaning eventually
Well he did that, and I agree with the rest of your post. Why have the movie if none of it meant anything?
>It's a contradictory mess of a film
it's only contradictory to bigot incels like yourself
What are some good 19th century fetishism movies (clothes, language, weapons, contraptions)? Recently watched Deadwood and that's the best production I ever saw
What a waste of a perfect character for Lewis. Fricking terrible movie.
do you have any legitimate criticisms or just buzzwords?
>buzzwords
Go back.
I guess that's a no
Sorry you have shit taste and are incredibly sensitive about it. You can cry about it on website.
pathetic
>has a temper tantrum being called out as a mental midget
>"n-no ur crying..."
>NOOOO YOU CAN'T CALL ME OUT ON MY DEARTH OF AN ARGUMENT
so you're a petulant child that can't formulate thoughts. concession accepted
Go back where? Where do you think that word gained popular use on the internet?
Sorcese's after the 2000s are straight shit
Scorsese’s overtly religious films are his best, his gangster ones are just excessively hyped due to men being really insecure about their masculinity.
Those movies are hyped because of Keitel, DeNiro and Liotta. He literally owes his whole career to them
all his films are boring, shit or boring & shit
If not for bill it would have been completely forgotten
look i'm acting
seethe more leogay
I'm detecting an undercurrent of salt about anglos in Scorcese's movies, like he's annoyed that they don't just let immigrants be criminal pieces of shit so he has them be just as bad if not worse.
I thought it was pretty good, aside from DDL hamming it up as usual
this dumb hat is literally un-believable, they didn't had to exaggerate the goofiness of the outfits so much; it's really ruin the immersion
The initial battle is so bad it looks like a SNL sketch or something.
Bad Hollywood movies (expensively mounted soulless husks) are why some of us branched out to other countries movies. Not a total loss.
Cut everything that isn't DDL
>by the way they're all forgotten now
great ending scorsy
You guys are all filtered trannies, it's unreal how filtered and how troony you are
I enjoyed the setting and the period attire/accents. The whole "racism is LE BAD" thing rings hollow though, since his own story undermines that concept on-screen. The Irish being force-conscripted right off the boat to go fight the Confederacy because the Union was losing at that point, and then people rioting because the war had nothing to do with them, killing blacks in the process, are both portrayed as bad. So what are you supposed to get from this? That the Irish shouldn't have been force-conscripted, meaning the Union would lose, but the population should also shut the frick up and march to war anyway? Then you have the gang fights, which echoes modern calls for "diversity, equity, and inclusion". If the people you're not supposed to mind existing in your neighborhood are openly killing people out in the streets, doesn't that just prove they shouldn't be around?
It's a contradictory mess of a film, but still fun.
Scorsese wanted to make a point about how all these conflicts have no meaning eventually but by doing so he invalidated the whole premise and got lost into whatever he wanted to do. Should've just ignored the big picture.
>Scorsese wanted to make a point about how all these conflicts have no meaning eventually
Well he did that, and I agree with the rest of your post. Why have the movie if none of it meant anything?
Your tiny brained buzzwords have no effect.
>It's a contradictory mess of a film
it's only contradictory to bigot incels like yourself
You can't into kinos. Just go play your video games.
What are some good 19th century fetishism movies (clothes, language, weapons, contraptions)? Recently watched Deadwood and that's the best production I ever saw
I like how he dedicates this gang movie to new yorkers at the end.