What are some controversial opinions that are going to get you yelled at on Cinemaphile
What are some controversial opinions that are going to get you yelled at on?
What are some controversial opinions that are going to get you yelled at on Cinemaphile
OP is not a homosexual.
Umm, homophobia isn't cool guys
Chase bugs in Hell, homosexual.
As someone who loves entomology, I hate how the term bug chaser is associated with homosexuals
It's hilarious actually
That you're not a homosexual
You're not a homosexual queer.
>there is no such thing as a spoiler.
knowing some simple information and having an experience are two separate things unrelated to each other. if your brain cant differentiate that, then you have a flawed, subhuman brain. if you think that knowing something "ruins" it, then you're moronic. also if knowing something "ruins" it, then it was never good in the first place, because any replay of it would be "ruined". anyone who complains about spoilers is a drooling moron with inferior mental faculties.
Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile might as well be the same board.
welcome to Cinemaphile. why did you choose my post and not op's?
Hi newbie lurk more before posting and being an embarrassment or leave
How did u know those are my main boards??
children of men is a top 10 big budget film of the post 2000
Aster, Villanueve, PTA, Nolan, and modern day Coens are all in the same slop checkmate. I don't know how they got there, but I won't pretend the films are good. Scorsese and W. Anderson are both transitioning to slop miller, Marty is closer but seems like he wants to fight it, Wes wants to be a slopman but he's too good. These generalizations are warranted.
It's a generational issue and I agree with your sentiment although the argument is 100% wrong. Obviously doing something for the first time is different, not discussing this
the evil scientology lord aspect is overblown because they mostly steal from other schizos and rich people, as is the case with freemasons. That said, he's made a lot of bad films and is just a visibly bad person which somewhat offsets his kino output.
>is just a visibly bad person
lol
literally everyone says tom is great to work with and a really nice guy
the only people who say otherwise are reddit incarnate ex-scientology losers
can you give a few examples of what makes tom so bad?
He's probably a top notch guy in person, don't get me wrong. Is Tom Cruise on the ball, you bet. He's just a dragon, you can see how alone he is and how warped his perception of the world ultimately is. I swear this isn't heightism or preconceived Tom Cruise hate, there's just nobody else in the world like Tom and his response to that is evidently to conquer. The reason he seems weirdly asexual and tightly wound is because he has goals outside humanity and those goals are the source of his success, NOT whatever genuine humanity he has left.
>overblown
I mean there is the kidnapping, the poisoning families minds against each other, forced manual labor, and the brutal harassment campaigns against anyone who so much as breathes a negative word about them so there’s that… oh and god help you if you ever want to leave, they will frick your shit up socially, financially, physically (arson, etc.) and that all has been proven
name one cult that won't do this if you piss them off
hard mode: no Cinemaphile or daily stormer
>the actions of other cults nullify their own deplorable actions because they’re all doing it
I don’t think that’s how it works fren
it's a michael jackson situation. If the man wants to associate with a cult that torments Californians, it feels right to make an exception since he's brought me personally so much joy. He isn't what they want him to be, a legitimizing force, because he's uncanny so the public danger isn't so bad.
I respect that take, the whole reason I posted that opinion in the first place is because it’s absolutely wild to me the amount of people who excuse scientology to the point of rabidly defending it on here just because they happen to like Tom Cruise and criticizing any detail or aspect of any person who is seen as “based” on here is seen as a mortal sin.
So true, people lowering themselves to shill level at the first sign of an argument is the doom of this site
>the amount of people who excuse scientology to the point of rabidly defending it on here just because they happen to like Tom Cruise
There is a proper scientology shill campaign run on here. Mostly happens late at night.
>name one cult that won't do this if you piss them off
Alcoholics Anonymous
>Villanueve, PTA, Nolan...are all in the same slop
yep they're shit. only 1-2 mediocre films between them
But how is Cruise a bad person? Everyone raves about how nice it is to work with him and how much they like him, how he wants everyone to succeed on set etc.
Never said he was a bad person and yeah I’ve heard that too. What I’m saying is that I don’t support him shilling an evil corporation and I don’t think he’s based for it which is something that plenty of people will defend him for on this board in particular
Pop-athiesm is a bigger force for evil than fricking Scientology, you have your priorities mixed up my friend
Imagine actually believing this. Never a dull moment with you idiots
>you have your priorities mixed up
Who says whining about either one needs to be prioritized? Who says you can't hate both equally? Lurk more.
it's complicated, see my post above. I really mean he's a bad example of a man, not in traditional measurable sense, but in the life and cinematic career he spun in immaculate detail for us to see. It's not just a show business face, he's been a public figure for 40 years and there's still more mystery than solid man.
person you replied to
not the person you replied to
hence the confusion
and as an artist, he's a combination of egotistical and workmanlike: a master craftsman type, an autist. A prick. He has no ambition for anything higher than top gun maverick, which was fine (and Tom is old) but it's the same old story again. The characters were constantly joking about it. That ultimately comes down to him
I will never give a shit about Children of Men because it boils down to "This nog lady is the most important person on Earth." and frankly if mankind was dying and the alternative was it repopulating solely as nogs, just let it die.
ironic. Movie has nothing to do with black people AT ALL. It's a big stretch, but try to imagine yourself as black and tell me what you would take away from it as a black person.
what a shit take
seethe harder, inferior cuck. i'll be over here enjoying my media, impervious to "spoilers" (and in fact intentionally looking them up sometimes). you'll still be there having your day/experience "ruined" by "spoilers" because you cant genuinely experience things and separate information from the experience itself.
You just try so hard.
This might be true EXCEPT in case of detective/mystery fiction. Nobody wants to know "the butler did it" before getting to the end of the story. And twist endings are genuinely more enjoyable when you don't expect them.
so its not good a second time? its "ruined" then? "spoiled"?
and while still inferior, it is the one niche of the subject that i will actually accommodate you lessers and hold my tongue in public discussions. everything else is open and fair game, and if you get hurt about it, you deserve it.
look here man, i'm not trying to to be hyperbolic here, but you have to admit there's less fun in a story when you already know how it goes. revisiting the same story is a different experience compared to the first time
not at all. i have enough empathy for the characters to just let the story tell itself and go along for the ride. its wonderful.
i'm talking about mystery/detective fiction though
yes, so am i. also all of the rest of it. i can watch knives out, or bullet train, or sixth sense, or whatever more than once and still enjoy it immensely. in fact, i often find that my enjoyment is HEIGHTENED in later times because i anticipate the next bit. a sort of "oh boy, here it comes!" moment. if your story is "ruined" or "spoiled" by knowing information ahead of time, then either you have a subhuman mental processing power or the story is shit. or both.
>in fact, i often find that my enjoyment is HEIGHTENED in later times because i anticipate the next bit.
That's good to know, tell me a few movies and series you plan to watch so I can tell you how they end
i dont think you understand. i actively look up endings to things all the time. i just read the wikipedia page for the new godzilla movie. it sounds fun. the attack on titan anime started 10 years ago. i had been constantly looking up events that happen in the manga the whole time while i waited for them to animate it. i still havent watched suzume, but i already read the wikipedia page for it. i havent watched the marvels yet (and honestly i might pass on it) but i read the summary already. hell, i watched the last 5 minutes when they're closing the hole. you have literally no power here. i enjoy my media, you fools are the weak and vulnerable ones.
that's cool bro, tell me something you plan to watch, i'd be happy to tell you about the twists and endings
i dont think i have anything that i plan to watch that i havent already looked up. like, i'm enjoying mushoku tensei, but its only on season 2, and theres still a ton more left to go. i've already looked up how it ends and about rudeus's wives, and that monkey dude that is secretly the champion of the human god. currently watching shield hero (slop that it is) and i know that atla is about to die. currently watching the new quantum leap show, and i'd LOVE to know how next week's episode will go down, but i dont think that info is out. i cant really think of anything that i currently intend to watch that i havent already looked up.
oh! actually, you know what i havent looked up? season 2 of loki. i've just been waiting for it to finish before getting started, and i kind of forgot that it existed. you can go ahead and tell me how that goes.
nah bro i don't wanna spend time looking up capeshit, check the wiki page yourself
kk, will do. you seemed so eager to help though. im not sure why you felt that way, but i didnt want to let you down.
i mean i wasn't under the impression that i was talking to someone who enjoys capeshit, which is the lowest slop possible. but yeah if you like it then knock yourself out.
i like a lot of things. is it slop? a lot of the time, sure, but they still can sometimes be fun stories and adventures. i think the only thing i dont find all that entertaining is horror/slasher stuff. characters and decisions are usually just too stupid and cringe. sometimes i can stick through it if i watch with friends and we riff on it in a "so bad that its good" kind of way.
its ok to like things, you know.
good for you
you usually revisit stories for different reasons than the epiphanies and plot climax
I revisit LOTR but never because I want to find out the fate of the ring like the first time
dumb fricking take
I revisit stuff if I enjoyed the setting and characters, it sort of becomes like watching old home movies in that sense. Like "This is a reality I would like to escape to." Mike said this when he first described his problems with nu-Trek, in old Star Trek shows the Federation or the Enterprise seemed like a nice, cozy place to live. It doesn't anymore, now it's just generic sci-fi.
I feel the same way, Star Trek was cozy, Star Wars OT and even the prequels were cozy. Farscape, LotR, Lexx, Babylon 5, several anime, cartoons and video games, all cozy.
Everything now is finite and political, everything's been uglied up and turned into misery porn. I don't want to escape to a setting full of ugly people with shit personalities obsessed with the political garbage I hate dealing with in my real life.
>so its not good a second time?
Movies don't have a requirement for having heightened rewatch value. Anyone with enough mental maturity and a memory better than a goldfish or a dementia patient can watch, enjoy, savor and then move on while holding onto their fond memories of it.
Yeah this is a special brand of autism.
It’s close but Cinemaphile is considerably more moronic in general. I’ve seen people fall for baits on there that a 6 year old would be able to spot.
call it what you want, you still suck for being so vulnerable and affected by simple information like "spoilers". cope.
Honestly based take.
Ignore the seething brainlet midwits.
I kinda get what you mean, but the experience is lessoned by knowing information too soon. Not to mention if the film is centered around building up a reveal it's hard to fully immerse yourself when you actually know what the reveal is rather than just suspecting it among other things.
>experience is lessened
>its hard to immerse
my point exactly. you operate to a lesser degree. i dont have that problem. subsequent times are just as good as the first.
>build up
and if you cant objectively recognize that was how it was constructed, to separate a list of facts from the flow of experience while holding them all at the same time, you have a lesser mental capacity.
>i just want to find out
absolutely brainlet take, unable to separate pieces of information from experiencing the story as a whole for what it is.
that has nothing to do with what im talking about. you're not interested in revisiting it because its not good.
nothingburger statement. have a nice day.
thats just fatigue of repetition. if you cant do 2, you're fricking hopeless.
I agree somewhat, but the gaining of whatever knowledge the experience brings is part of the experience too. A moment will be designed with you not knowing it beforehand in mind most of the time, and if you have it in mind it will affect how you experience it as well as how you experience whatever leads up to it, there may be build up to whatever was spoiled for example, but it would be put in with the expectation that the audience wouldn't know what it's building up to in advance. I don't think a spoiler can ruin anything, but it can affect your experience and transform it into something different than what the filmmaker's probably intended.
he's right you know
Based. If something has to surprise you just to be good, it isnt.
Are you aware of the concept of novelty? some say that is important in many contexts, for example the telling of a joke. many people find that hearing the same joke a second time does not elicit the same amount of mirth as the first time. Perhaps this has something to do with this concept of "novelty" and the related concept of "surprise".
Episodes 6, 7, and 8 of Rings of Power were really fricking good. Like season one Game of Thrones good.
Yeah I love the scene where the young village qt is stabbed to make a point and you can see the look of horror on her face as she realizes it's over for her and sinks helplessly to the ground. The rusty blade piercing her young fertile womb. Imagine young qt medieval villagers crying for help as they are mericilessly killed, their fertile young bodies wasted, so innocent and left to rot slowly, until they are absorbed into the land and become part of nature again.
You sound like you crave wiener
I first read that as "you sound like a cave rock" and I lol'd.
Well now I am un-e-girlng
i don't like pets
cat and dog owners are subhuman in my eyes
>2019 was the strongest year in film since 1999
>Ari Aster is the best active American filmmaker and Beau Is Afraid is the best movies of the 2020s so far by a wide margin
>After Hours is Scorsese's best movie
>the prequels are worse than the sequels
>examples?
>not even close. PTA shits all over him. Also, even Oppenheimer was a better flick than Beau.
>The King of Comedy, but that’s a nice one too.
>TLJ is maybe the worst movie I’ve ever sat through in my entire life. It’s a black hole of awfulness.
>TLJ is maybe the worst movie I’ve ever sat through in my entire life
Then you must be a zoomer or someone who only watches mass-appeal projects. That is not an argument in favour of TLJ but an observation of your recency bias.
>Portrait of a Lady on Fire, Corpus Christi, Parasite, Midsommar, The Lighthouse, 1917, Uncut Gem, Little Women, 1917, Lux Aeterna, Ready or Not, A Hidden Life, Knives Out, The Vast of night
>PTA hasn't done anything as good as any of Aster's features since Hereditary was released, Oppenheimer is 3.5/5 at best and pure midwit slop
>After Hours>King of Comedy, arguably Bringing Out the Dead is also better
>You need to watch way more movies if that's your sincere opinion
Op is definitely not a flaming poofter
Taxi Drive is a stupid and shit film. The King of Comedy is a million times better.
Not really controversial
explain where this cat came from and why he looks cuter than other cats
EXPLAIN NOW
It's the eyes.
yeah, but what specifically about the eyes?
and which AI and what prompts do I use to generate more?
try dilated pupils
jews are not that bad actually
Tom Cruise isn’t based and is just a shill for a cult. He’s basically like a puppet with no personality whose only function serves to promote the church of scientology and everyone here is such a moronic contrarian that they praise him for it not realizing that’s some NPC type behavior and they aren’t cool for having controversial opinions.
funnily, everything you typed is NPC talking points and stupidity
Defending the church of scientology or even just being passive about it and downplaying it is some omega cringe edgelord homosexualry
>a moronic contrarian for praising one of the most praised actors of all time
You're right about his function in regards to Scientology tho
Since when does mass praise and near-universal approval qualify anything as based? Might want to rethink that one
Maybe
But at least he isn't a israelite.
Matt, you're glib
Edge of Tomorrow was kino and it doesn't matter what Tom does off set
I met him in Cornwall once a few years back when he was sailing around on holiday. He stopped and said hello to everyone and bought a load of Cornish pasties before he said bye
Tegridy Farms saved South Park.
It’s a good idea and works well for the show and the themes it’s moving on with. Randy is a middle class guy with a good job, just the sort of person who would try and start their own business. Cartoon shows are usually annoyingly static so it’s good to see them moving with the times instead of just doing exactly what their detractors say and writing the same episodes over and over again.
>Southpark sucks
>Seinfeild sucks
>Spongebob is irredeemable garbage
>The simpsons hasn't been good longer than most people here have been alive
i lurrrrrv tha cat
Waterworld > Conan the Barbarian
Dragons Dogma is overrated jank shit
>gets yelled at
checks out
watching anything made by netflix/amazon is much worse than watching anime
ironman trilogy is trash and later capeshit is much better
munich is spielberg's best movie
russel crowe > mel gibson
there's only like, a handful of giallos that are any good, and the rest are garbage that people pretend to like for hipster points
oh, and i forgot, archer/metalocalypse/ and helluvaboss are the best adult animated shows
Hazbin Hotel pilot was better than Helluvaboss pilot and deserved the effort the latter got
no hh is shit
guillermo del toro has never directed a bad film and this board doesn't appreciate him enough
>guillermo del toro has never directed a bad film
i'm literally never watching another thing by him after the shape of water even if people say it's the greatest masterpiece of all time
That Jenny is cute.
Seth Rogen is okay if he has James Franco or Danny McBride to back him up.
That's because they both did very good straight men to his stoner autism.
I don't find little girls attractive
heh, good show. God frick I hate the pedos.
the sopranos and oz suck
Reddit is right about Fight Club being a stupid movie.
cinema is fricking dead. millennial 'writers' deserve hell, existentialism was just bullshit all made up by psychotic israelite, every movie with existentialism is all bullshit. we need to nuclearize california, burn down all the film & drama & anime production companies, delete all the media since 2012 and preserve only games and books in post 2012 (except ps exclusive games, they all deserve death too)
Scott Pilgram sucked in all it's forms right from the start. It was always about a loser dating a high school girl who gets obsessed with an Amazon delivery girl. There is no chemistry in their relationship and she isn't hot in the least. Even the basic premise of her "delivering for Amazon" is moronic as Amazon doesn't hire private entities to deliver their packages. The use of video game terminology, references and power ups felt cheap, stupid and unoriginal. The art is insultingly bad, the author admitted the "world" is literally just his fricking hometown. And the biggest issue is Ramona is a fricking prostitute. She has seven evil exes, two of which she cheated on with eachother. Her first boyfriend she got with explicitly to "attack anything white and male" ooooh what do you know a ricecel wrote a comic about a white girl who hates white men and her exes consist of two asian dudes, a paki, a girl, a israelite and two white guys. The important thing here is her history can only suggest two possibilities. Either he's attracted to evil people or she is somehow corrosive and turns people who date her evil. Either way if she was interested in me I would thus be concerned.
Garbage story liked by garbage people and it's peak lazy, cynical millennial bullshit. The same uninspired, insipid shit as FEZ, DepressionQuest, Adventure Time, Stephen Universe and Rick & Morty. Miserable, worthless idea thieves utterly devoid of actual talent who draw like they were born at Calarts and write like they apprenticed underTheAmazingAtheist "create" these things. And these talentless hacks just went from somehow getting their own garbage made to subjecting other people's creations to their vile touch.
>There is no chemistry in their relationship
This always stuck out to me, even in the comics there was nothing going on there other than “hot bawd, me want” as far as Scott’s perspective. They didn’t even get along that well
Why does it fill you with such uncontrollable rage though? Just don’t watch it. It’s not even like it’s a difficult IP to avoid.
>uncontrollable rage
That's a hyperbolic and completely inaccurate characterization that just makes you sound incredibly defensive and desiring that things you like never be criticized. Why can't you handle things you like being critiqued? Is it because you're totally unable to defend them?
All the usual suspects came out to defend and simp for it and proclaim it was the best thing ever because it was a popular thing that promoted their world views. So on top of being shit, that makes it propaganda.
I'm glad it bombed.
im tired of coming to this board expecting film discussion like i did in 2011 and only end up seeing endless reactionary propaganda threads
>like in 2011
>reactionary
Shut the frick up newbie, it's always been like this. Go look at the fricking archives before you make another moronic post
ok election tourist
>im tired of coming to this board expecting film discussion like i did in 2011 and only end up seeing endless reactionary propaganda threads
People complain about "reactionaries"
Maybe if you people toned down the "action" you wouldn't have people telling you to frick off
Scott Pilgrim is a really good movie.
AQUAMAN IS MUCH BETTER THAN BVS.
GODZILLA VS KONG IS THE MOST FLAWED MONSTERVERSE FILM.
SHIN GODZILLA IS MERELY GOOD
Prestige sucked ass. The movie made no sense no matter how you look at it.
Bale used a twin to do the stunt, after seeing the Chinese magician.
Chinese magician was a one man show and could always stay in character.
Meanwhile Bale depended on not being seen with his twin. That means he could never do the trick while working with Jackman, Kingsley, so wtf was the other twin doing while they were on good terms?
Furthermore, the sacrifice they would both make lets them pull off exactly one trick, or variations thereof, so it's hardly worth it.
Finally, of you were in the audience, you would assume that he's using a twin or a double. A rival magician who didn't snoop around Bale's workshop would assume he's using a twin or a double. There's no mystery and anyone who isn't invested into Bale would guess correctly - ironically the less you knew the more correct you'd be.
So the point of the twin ruse is what? To be able to frick with Jackman in case you accidentally kill his girlfriend, fall out and he gets obsessed with trying to discover how you're pulling off the one trick he can't explain because he knows you for a long time and falsely believes you don't actually have a twin?
the point was obsession. they were both utterly obsessed with being the best. obsession makes for some illogical choices. you do have a point about suspecting the twin thing though. i feel like the hardest part would be keeping the stage area secure from spying eyes so they wouldnt be able to catch both twins at the same time. but other than that, it all fits really well. and of course you have to suspend disbelief about the magic teleportation/clone stuff. but obsession can get to a man, especially AFTER they've dedicated decades to the craft (and in the twin's case, to each other).
Scott Pilgrim vs the world is actually an excellent film.
I enjoyed matrix reloaded
RoP was half decent and worth watching.
Who is this guy? I’ve been seeing him everywhere lately
Hamas won
Oppenheimer is the best US film of the year.
Nolan is a soulless hack who has been high on his own farts since Inception
anime website
Nearly half of all trannies are alright people
I agree. About 42% of them aren't a problem to me.
Only the ugly ones kill themselves. So you agree the attractive ones are good?
homosexuals
The joke is that the dead ones are the good ones, shithead.
its ok to like things.
This place talks about transgender people so much I'm starting to think a lot of you guys are closet homosexuals. If you hate something why the hell would you keep bringing it up? That's the definition of moronic.
I absolutely despise French film
then whyd you post a pic of a polish film?
As an example of something that's superior
Pleb
Cinemaphile is fun sometimes for acting like an idiot and meming, but reddit is the best site for actual movie discussion.
At least on reddit, it's actually possible to have a normal discussion without someone telling you to have a nice day cause you like a movie that they don't. The mods are better on there too.
cope & seethe
Reddit movie discussions are basically echo chambers though. Say anything that goes against the grain and you get downvoted or ignored. It's basically a circle jerk. On Cinemaphile people say both good and bad things about it and people will respond to both
>downdoots
If you don't think there's a hivemind to always go against the grain on Cinemaphile, then you haven't been browsing here long enough.
There's a reason that people meme Cinemaphile starting to hate something they once loved once it becomes popular on a different more popular site.
once the mainstream shuns trannies Cinemaphile will start loving them again like in the before times
yeah ok I'm fine with this.
But the mainstream needs to really shun them. Like put trannies on a permanent sex offender list, restrict their employment in education/healthcare and ostracize them from society like we used to do with lepers. Then I might consider bullying them a bit less, but not before.
I never liked trannies and I've been here since 2014. Is that before enough? Would I have loved them if I came here in 2009? I miss the old Internet sometimes but I never would have liked trannies. They are men and that's final.
2014 is a newbie you ruined the site
2000s internet tolerated traps because it was all clearly gay nerd twinks crossdressing for attention. Not the modern delusional AGP freaks demanding literally everything revolve around their perversion. Old internet and old fochan did NOT love or respect actual trannies.
>Cinemaphile isn’t an echo chamber
I honestly can’t tell if this is satire.
Reddit is better for discussion in general, but their voting system works against them. Used right it would be sort of like a self moderation tool to bump off the shitposts and bump up the interesting and engaging posts, but it ends up just being a agree/disagree button. Everything is going to have their own echo chamber with people who hate it when others don't conform to the norm but that system actively suppresses any dissenting opinion. If it were removed and they still kept their autistic jannies reddit would be an objectively better site.
>reddit is the best site for actual movie discussion
So go back.
I'm on both right now.
Why? If you hate it here so much then why open tabs here or have discussions here at all? Most channers hate redditBlack folk and redditBlack folk hate how they get treated here and yet you keep coming back. It's like some kind of online version of battered wife syndrome.
I dont hate it here though. I lurk and post here more often than reddit despite it being better for actual film discussion.
I rather enjoy the Hobbit films. Obviously they are a travesty compared to the LotR films, but they are still better and more genuine than most modern blockbuster films that all the normalgays cream over.
those cats arent even doing anything. besides the one cat meowing
The Australian movie Upgrade is stupid.
t. Australian
Rush Hour isn’t funny
Gladiator sucks
Rome HBO 80% sucks
Eva Green isn’t hot
Drive sucks
Avril Lavigne sucks
This dude thinks endgame was the peak of cinema and his favourite movie is avatar (but only in 4k)
No my favorite movie is fellowship and avatar sucks too.
Anime is comfy and can be kino.
>Fishman Island
>comfy
>kino
Very hard case to maintain because the only anime I've ever enjoyed was Redline but the everything else anyone calls kino anime has been shit and anime lovers in general are either autistic, pedos or trannies. Or a combination of the lot.
Jim Carey's The Grinch is a great movie with lots of effort put in
wow, i didnt know this movie was poorly received. one of our family's holiday classics for sure
idk man movies are kind of mid and i always find myself looking at my phone watching youtube shorts nd chatting nd stuff when trying to watch them
Thats the average poster here, you will get no pushback on this.
I love watching and discussing television and film. While I watch I don't think about or even care for the director/actor/studio/lunch lady's politics at all.
After israeli trillionaire activists ruin Disney they’ll find a new media company to ruin
I don't hate all israelites, just the israelites living in and subverting the West. Israeli israelites seem pretty cool and I hope they keep on killing mudslimes.
Nearly every anime is utter garbage. You know why you don't like dubs? It's because you realize how cringe it all is when you hear it being said in your native tongue. There are rare exceptions.
I don't like dubs because of the lack of effort and heart.
That's what you tell yourself.
It's true. There are dubs that are perfectly fine too that I don't mind watching, but the sub is still better. I sort of agree with you that most anime isnt good though. Not really garbage, but mid. For weebs a 6/10 anime is always hyped up like an 8 or 9.
you will never be a cat person
Anime mogs cinema
Everyone who went on strike in Hollywood were perfectly fine with working with sex criminals and will still work with them in the future.
Tom Hardy was a terrible miscast for Mad Max
All jokes and memes aside Eric Roberts is a great dude and a solid actor.
Lynch is a talentless hack
Elaborate.
Kute kots.
I don't give a shit about trannies or israelites.
I actually think Prometheus is a good movie, and I've thought this since release
Bane wasn’t that big
>No, Ivan,
Oh my god, it's the esl moron! I haven't seen you post in months. I always wonder what shithole you're from that you think this even fits for Russia, is Ivan even a common Russian name? How old were you when you were first diagnosed with autism?
>is Ivan even a common Russian name?
NTA but yes, it's incredibly common in Russia and other Slavic countries. It's just their way of saying "John."
Return of the King and Two Towers are not great. The trilogy is held up completely by the stellar first film.
TT is the best
>I lurk and post here more often than reddit
Lurk more homosexual
Probably been here longer than you buddy.
And yet your lurk probation still isn't over homosexual
Jokes on you, I still get the internet points even if you indirectly respond :^)
>did u just REPLY to my POST
>reddit face
kek you both deserve the rope
>did u just REPLY to my POST
Yes you did 😉
Kingdom of Heaven director's cut is worse than the theatrical
The earlier seasons of the simpsons hurts my eyes with how badly animated it is, the supposed golden age of the simpsones is unwatchable for me
Baneposting was never funny...
Until German wings
The last jedi is the best nu-starwars film
after rogue 1
Disgusting on both accounts.
Goodfellas is a fricking mess of a movie. It has 3-4 great scenes strewn around a directionless chaotic runtime with horrible pacing
It's a great movie but you answered the question well
>out of the blue it has timestamps
nah it's a mess bro
Sergio Leone's movies are bloated and boring. For a Few Dollars More is his only good film.
All modern western entertainment is made for women and you are massive homosexuals for consoooming it
What do you consume?
Nothing anymore just read now. I don't know how cucked the rest of the worlds entertainment is to say its all is bad. Heard there are some good Spanish/Jap movies but I have not checked them out.
Well yeah, the world of television and film spans far beyond just the limited amount of US content that you've been exposed to. But still, what have you liked in the past?
I liked dark, comedy, psychological or philosophical. I really enjoyed the anime Berserk because of the philosophical undertones but I never really watch anime either. The last movie I watched and enjoyed was source code ( 2011)
I feel like there's tons of content like that still being made today, even in the US and definitely also in the UK.
I'll check out some UK stuff then any recommendations
Source Code was ace for a cheap film. Whenever it's on Film4 I watch it again
DVD quality is fine for most movies and many movies in Blu-ray look weird or expose flaws
Star Wars, Marvel, DC, any superhero film threads should be moved to a new board called /slop/ and mentioning them should be banned
exceptions made for baneposting