Star Wars had only one good movie back in 1977 and went downhill ever since. Empire Strikes Back has prequel tier writing and dialogue, but I bet you if it were made in 2002 they would’ve hated it alongside Phantom Menace.
Here's the real truth. Nobody disliked the prequels until reddit letter media made a hit piece on them. They were always good and it took actual bad star wars movies for many to see it.
People are easily influenced by a funny YouTube video. Look how easy it was to convince people who would never actually sit down to a roguelike by caves of qud, or how easy to convince people "no mans sky is actually good now!" when it blows.
I was 10 when phantom came out, and no, there was a pokemon/harry potter like burst of popularity when the prequels came out. Never saw a scrap of complaints until the "not influential" tens of millions of views comedy hit piece everyone criticising the prequels quotes came along.
Imagine someone so stupid they think their 10 year old brain getting overwhelmed with marketing hype equates to a clear view of what is going on in reality. Probably didn't evolve an iota since that age. What a sad loser.
If you want to see what actual backlash looks like amid immense marketing, look at the last jedi release. Nothing close to that existed for any prequel. All you had was kids enjoying a good kids movie, gen xers enjoying nostalgia, and eventually a reddit hit piece that made everyone bandwagon dislike them.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You repeating your bullshit nostalgia lie again and again will not make it any more true, moron kid. Everyone over the age of 6 who was not in the studios payroll disliked those horrible, dumb movies.
You enjoy them - good, have fun. But don't get angry when other people interpret that as what it means: that you are stupid and have bad taste.
4 months ago
Anonymous
You can't say one reason why they are bad without parroting rlm.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I dont need to say any reason, it's entirely self evident to everyone but the most stupid. I know I will never be able to convince you, but I feel as bad about that as that I will never convince a dumb dog that he shouldn't be eating shit. He just likes it and would try to convince you it is good in exactly the same way you are trying to fight for "the attack of the phantom menace"!
Horrible lie made up by dumb zoomers who grew up on those shit movies. The collective disappointment when episode 1 was a wet fart can hardly be put into words. We had been hoping for a new star wars movie for more than 10 years. Imagine more than 10 years for a kid, teenager, it's a lifetime. Star wars were THE best movies, you have to remember NOTHING looked like it back then. The trailer for the new one looked so badass, it was tremendously exciting. And then this shit. With a fricking child as the star and not a single likeable character. Just jarjar, big fish eating bigger fish and a non intimidating, face painter villain. I get annoyed just thinking back on it. When we saw 2 in theatres the shock wasn't so great, because 1 had sucked already, but then was when everyone really started saying Lucas has lost it. Non-story, non-charisma, non-soul boring shit but now in top of it all it also looked like absolute shit. The effects looked ps2 even the and early digital projection emphasized every pixel. Didn't even bother to see 3 in the cinema. Caught it later and was a wise decision to skip it, just more of number 2 bullshit.
The prequels are and have always been shit. If you think they are good you are an idiot. Simple as.
1, 2, and 5 were my favorites as a kid because I liked big battles with lots of soldiers and those three were the movies that had those. You liked them too until reddit letter media told you not to.
1 and 2 are the best by far, of course. I wouldn't ever say anything else. 5 is the one with "I don't like sand" - again, if you think these movies are good you are mentally challenged at least. It's fine, but don't try to discuss with mentally normal people, downsboy
Empire is usually quoted as among the best, not sure what it has to do with sand.
4 months ago
Anonymous
1 is the first that was made, it is called star wars. 2 is the second one that was made, it is called the empire strikes back. The fifth was something about clones and some homosexual who says he doesn't like sand, I can hardly remember.
this anon gets it
prequels were widely hated long before RLM existed, and are still widely hated by people who have never heard of RLM. they films are despised on their own merits.
>You only know the story is shit and the characters suck and having a child the star is stupid and jarjar is an even worse character than watto and that the bad guy looks like a mediocre cos player and nothing in the plot makes sense because someone else said it!
So you agree with RLMs criticisms, right?
4 months ago
Anonymous
No, I agree with a few of them but overall the first two prequels are generally great movies with lots of varied action scenes and an enormous level of world building rivaling tolkein.
I haven't seen the RLM video, but I see it's only from 10 years ago, so I can easily give you reasons that were common criticisms at least a decade before that video came out: >meandering nonsense storylines that go nowhere >characters doing things in excessively complex ways for no reason >both anakin actors being literally the worst >what the frick is george lucas's editing >what the frick is george lucas's dialog >why would obi wan fondly remember literally any interaction with anakin >none of the things said about anakin/vader in the OT make sense anymore >they made boba fett lame >they made yoda lame >they made obiwan lame >they made the emperor lame >they completely crucified the vader character to the point that it's impossible to take him seriously in any of the OT movies once you know the implied shakespearean tragic downfall is actually just him being a whiny teenager throwing a temper tantrum. >killing the younglings and other "serious" bits consistently coming off as unintentional comedy >whatever in gods name was going on with the CGI that made it already look 10 years out of date at release day >extended videogame level sequences >blatant "make a toy out of this" characters everywhere >wasting christopher lee
I mean I could just go on like this all day. maybe RLM parroted some of those but none of them are from RLM originally.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I almost think that people who claim RLM made people hate the prequels are trolling. I mean, you can easily go find reviews from 1999 that say TPM sucks.
I remember the unquantifiable hype of SW fans leading up to the prequels, and I remember being one of the disappointed kids walking out of phantom menace in the theater, surrounded by other equally disappointed kids. there were basically two groups, people who loudly hated it and wanted george lucas dragged out of his house and dismembered, and people who were desperately making up excuses to try and cope with how bad it sucked. and attack of the clones was even worse. people kinda came back around on sith when it came out, but it was in that same smarmy, half-apologetic "well, at least it's not another phantom menace!" way that people do when they try to pretend one of the new ones doesn't suck. so no, you are completely full of shit. if they weren't "disliked", it's only because that isn't strong enough a word.
what would you even parrot? it's not like RLM was saying anything original. they were just summarizing and making fun of what had been common knowledge since the movies came out. the whole reason people like videos like that is because it's just reaffirming what they already knew.
You've been fooled by comedy, it's very easy to do. There was no "consensus" among kids when the prequels came out, and the internet was in its infancy as far as being a discussion platform goes. Where you're getting this information, that everyone hated the prequels coincidentally for the same reasons rlm said to in their comedy documentaries, is a complete mystery.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>the internet was in its infancy as far as being a discussion platform
who is out of touch here?
this was 1999 not 1989. shit was very much not in its infancy.
I remember that when I saw TPM in 1999 I thought it sucked because I didn't want to see some lame kid hero, JarJar was annoying, the Gungans and the droids with their silly voices seemed like they were designed to entertain 3 year olds, the midichlorian bullshit demystified the force, the "there was no father" shit was a cringy Jesus reference, the chosen one prophecy was super-generic fantasy bullshit, the podracing scene dragged on for too long and had nothing to do with the rest of the plot... and that's just what I remember off the top of my head
Lol, I forgot about the midichlorians, that was among the loudest criticisms back then, how it devalued the whole idea of the force. Christ, the prequels are shut. Imagine how dumb you would need to be to like them.. .
All I'm going to say is, the only people I've encountered who had any real bias against the prequels were people who were terminally online (even then). I'm sure the Something Awful Forums had a few things to say about the prequels, and that's no major surprise, since their entire brand was being cynical about everything, but your normie movie watching people were never particularly offended by the prequels.
A lot of people still thought CGI was a cool novelty back then. For a lot of people, all of that stuff was worth watching just for that. Building an entire character with just computers was a cool prospect to people. It wasn't something people immediately groaned at.
They didn't immediately groan at it, they were super excited for it. They groaned after they had seen it because it turned out shit. Seriously, if you can look at attack of the clones and say anything about it looks good or cool - you are dumb. Why don't you just accept it and live your life happy? You know the saying ignorance is bliss? It means "it's better to be stupid" - smart people say it because being smart often is a burden. They wish they were like you - savor your gift.
>Nobody disliked the prequels until reddit letter media made a hit piece on them
Bro I saw The Phantom Menace in a theater in 1999 when it came out and I thought it sucked back then.
I had just became a teen, loved it, attack of the clones was awful when released, and TPM got worse on rewatches between. Revenge of the SIth is legit a good film, 3rd best
This movie was shit before this scene, but became one of the worst film ever made after it. The case the enter film was built up to was won by yelling and demanding.
Reminder that blacks proportionally got more shots and were more aggressive when it came to others getting shots than any other race. But you know, aggression and darkies are part in parcel.
It doesn't matter how much money Hollywood loses, queer propaganda won't disappear from your films unless the government steps in and starts outright censoring it.
Queer propaganda can be inserted into any genre of film, capeshit dying will simply result in studios reorienting to dirt-cheap slice-of-life romcoms and drama shit.
95% of the global population is worthless and serves no purpose but to support a large population, they need to be culled
this is easy to accept, what is hard is that I am one of those people
wrong. The human population behaves like a bell's curve. The more people you have, the more geniuses you have. Forget the base idiots - they are just needed and can do simple labor. It's the peak that you want. Right now, we have more Mozart-level geniuses living on earth than ever before, just because we are many.
We actually dont, the number of geniuses per capita is declining along with average i.q, which peaked about 100 years ago (and before you say it, yes this includes when you control for race)
in the long term we are sacrificing the total number of geniuses possible by expending resources on keeping useless mouths fed and centrally heated with natural gas
the longer civilization is allowed to continually grow without any sort of population cutbacks the less likely there will be a recovery after the next culling
The holocaust was either heavily exaggerated or fabricated entirely, and the aim was the creation of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians. All this recent shit about how shocking it is that israelites would commit genocide in Gaza after "what happened to them" is laughable. Nothing happened to them, they were put in camps temporarily, and then they used it as a propaganda. Now, big surprise, the same people who are capable of such lies are engaging in genocide.
It's not "surprising" that a bunch of duplicitous monsters are capable of genocide, it is about as on-brand as you can possibly be.
Vast majority of people here have elitist attitudes when it comes to film, despite them not having seen enough films to genuinely warrant that elitism.
>Hitler was a mentally damaged frick up that caused a war he could not win and got his country destroyed as a result.
Yes, obviously. >The holocaust happened.
Yep, the arguments in favor of it being a hoax are very weak. >It will not happen again.
No way to know that. >White genocide is not real.
It's somewhat real in the sense that there are actually some people out there who literally want fewer white people, but it's probably not real in the sense of there being major political players who have that as a goal. >Race is not real.
It's very real and can be seen by just looking up the skin tone of people who are world-class sprinters, for example. It's just not real if you are criticizing the straw-man version of "thinking that you can neatly categorize people into one of several racial buckets".
Fishtank and Cinemaphile crossposters are drastically reduced the quality of this board
Barbenheimer was forced as frick
Sneed was only funny when Moeposters existed
LOTR isn't a sacred cow
/misc/ crossposters need to learn to stop taking bait and derailing threads
Janny should delete more threads
Gosling posting stopped being funny the moment reddit/twitter/discord users started coopting everything
Vinceposting was actually funny
Cinemaphile is dead
fascism, anti semitism and racism are a product of not understanding the mechanisms of the relationship between capitalism, the state and class society
sorry chuds
I remember when the movie came out, and how bad-a** everyone (including me) thought he was. But now that I'm much older, I new see him as another pompous bureaucrat who long ago forget the difference between his own interests and that of his country.
Sneed is a dead meme and The son of the mask posting was funnier
Son of the mask posting?
Did you miss it? It was the best.
When was this? Sounds amazing. That movie was a shitpost by itself
The Enterprise-E is cooler than the Enterprise-D.
Star Wars had only one good movie back in 1977 and went downhill ever since. Empire Strikes Back has prequel tier writing and dialogue, but I bet you if it were made in 2002 they would’ve hated it alongside Phantom Menace.
Here's the real truth. Nobody disliked the prequels until reddit letter media made a hit piece on them. They were always good and it took actual bad star wars movies for many to see it.
People are easily influenced by a funny YouTube video. Look how easy it was to convince people who would never actually sit down to a roguelike by caves of qud, or how easy to convince people "no mans sky is actually good now!" when it blows.
To buy* caves of qud
Here’s the real truth: Star Wars is shit for kids and if you have any opinion on it you’re a manchild.
>manchild
Cinemaphile users have no right to be using this word. If you use this place past the age of 25 you’re a hilariously colossal failure.
These posts have to be made by zoomers right? The prequels immediately received backlash, RLM aren't as influential as people make them out to be..
I was 10 when phantom came out, and no, there was a pokemon/harry potter like burst of popularity when the prequels came out. Never saw a scrap of complaints until the "not influential" tens of millions of views comedy hit piece everyone criticising the prequels quotes came along.
Imagine someone so stupid they think their 10 year old brain getting overwhelmed with marketing hype equates to a clear view of what is going on in reality. Probably didn't evolve an iota since that age. What a sad loser.
If you want to see what actual backlash looks like amid immense marketing, look at the last jedi release. Nothing close to that existed for any prequel. All you had was kids enjoying a good kids movie, gen xers enjoying nostalgia, and eventually a reddit hit piece that made everyone bandwagon dislike them.
You repeating your bullshit nostalgia lie again and again will not make it any more true, moron kid. Everyone over the age of 6 who was not in the studios payroll disliked those horrible, dumb movies.
You enjoy them - good, have fun. But don't get angry when other people interpret that as what it means: that you are stupid and have bad taste.
You can't say one reason why they are bad without parroting rlm.
I dont need to say any reason, it's entirely self evident to everyone but the most stupid. I know I will never be able to convince you, but I feel as bad about that as that I will never convince a dumb dog that he shouldn't be eating shit. He just likes it and would try to convince you it is good in exactly the same way you are trying to fight for "the attack of the phantom menace"!
Go jerk off to jarjar bings you colossal loser xD
Horrible lie made up by dumb zoomers who grew up on those shit movies. The collective disappointment when episode 1 was a wet fart can hardly be put into words. We had been hoping for a new star wars movie for more than 10 years. Imagine more than 10 years for a kid, teenager, it's a lifetime. Star wars were THE best movies, you have to remember NOTHING looked like it back then. The trailer for the new one looked so badass, it was tremendously exciting. And then this shit. With a fricking child as the star and not a single likeable character. Just jarjar, big fish eating bigger fish and a non intimidating, face painter villain. I get annoyed just thinking back on it. When we saw 2 in theatres the shock wasn't so great, because 1 had sucked already, but then was when everyone really started saying Lucas has lost it. Non-story, non-charisma, non-soul boring shit but now in top of it all it also looked like absolute shit. The effects looked ps2 even the and early digital projection emphasized every pixel. Didn't even bother to see 3 in the cinema. Caught it later and was a wise decision to skip it, just more of number 2 bullshit.
The prequels are and have always been shit. If you think they are good you are an idiot. Simple as.
1, 2, and 5 were my favorites as a kid because I liked big battles with lots of soldiers and those three were the movies that had those. You liked them too until reddit letter media told you not to.
1 and 2 are the best by far, of course. I wouldn't ever say anything else. 5 is the one with "I don't like sand" - again, if you think these movies are good you are mentally challenged at least. It's fine, but don't try to discuss with mentally normal people, downsboy
Empire is usually quoted as among the best, not sure what it has to do with sand.
1 is the first that was made, it is called star wars. 2 is the second one that was made, it is called the empire strikes back. The fifth was something about clones and some homosexual who says he doesn't like sand, I can hardly remember.
Oh yes hilarious and original
this anon gets it
prequels were widely hated long before RLM existed, and are still widely hated by people who have never heard of RLM. they films are despised on their own merits.
Yet you can't explain why without quoting rlm. Which is why nobody has said a single reason why they were disliked.
>You only know the story is shit and the characters suck and having a child the star is stupid and jarjar is an even worse character than watto and that the bad guy looks like a mediocre cos player and nothing in the plot makes sense because someone else said it!
So you agree with RLMs criticisms, right?
No, I agree with a few of them but overall the first two prequels are generally great movies with lots of varied action scenes and an enormous level of world building rivaling tolkein.
I haven't seen the RLM video, but I see it's only from 10 years ago, so I can easily give you reasons that were common criticisms at least a decade before that video came out:
>meandering nonsense storylines that go nowhere
>characters doing things in excessively complex ways for no reason
>both anakin actors being literally the worst
>what the frick is george lucas's editing
>what the frick is george lucas's dialog
>why would obi wan fondly remember literally any interaction with anakin
>none of the things said about anakin/vader in the OT make sense anymore
>they made boba fett lame
>they made yoda lame
>they made obiwan lame
>they made the emperor lame
>they completely crucified the vader character to the point that it's impossible to take him seriously in any of the OT movies once you know the implied shakespearean tragic downfall is actually just him being a whiny teenager throwing a temper tantrum.
>killing the younglings and other "serious" bits consistently coming off as unintentional comedy
>whatever in gods name was going on with the CGI that made it already look 10 years out of date at release day
>extended videogame level sequences
>blatant "make a toy out of this" characters everywhere
>wasting christopher lee
I mean I could just go on like this all day. maybe RLM parroted some of those but none of them are from RLM originally.
I almost think that people who claim RLM made people hate the prequels are trolling. I mean, you can easily go find reviews from 1999 that say TPM sucks.
I remember the unquantifiable hype of SW fans leading up to the prequels, and I remember being one of the disappointed kids walking out of phantom menace in the theater, surrounded by other equally disappointed kids. there were basically two groups, people who loudly hated it and wanted george lucas dragged out of his house and dismembered, and people who were desperately making up excuses to try and cope with how bad it sucked. and attack of the clones was even worse. people kinda came back around on sith when it came out, but it was in that same smarmy, half-apologetic "well, at least it's not another phantom menace!" way that people do when they try to pretend one of the new ones doesn't suck. so no, you are completely full of shit. if they weren't "disliked", it's only because that isn't strong enough a word.
You're not saying any reasons why it was claimed to have been disliked because you're afraid of anachronistically quoting reddit letter media.
Everyone hates your shitty favorite movies homosexual. Back then as well as today. They suck.
Verification not required
what would you even parrot? it's not like RLM was saying anything original. they were just summarizing and making fun of what had been common knowledge since the movies came out. the whole reason people like videos like that is because it's just reaffirming what they already knew.
You've been fooled by comedy, it's very easy to do. There was no "consensus" among kids when the prequels came out, and the internet was in its infancy as far as being a discussion platform goes. Where you're getting this information, that everyone hated the prequels coincidentally for the same reasons rlm said to in their comedy documentaries, is a complete mystery.
>the internet was in its infancy as far as being a discussion platform
who is out of touch here?
this was 1999 not 1989. shit was very much not in its infancy.
I remember that when I saw TPM in 1999 I thought it sucked because I didn't want to see some lame kid hero, JarJar was annoying, the Gungans and the droids with their silly voices seemed like they were designed to entertain 3 year olds, the midichlorian bullshit demystified the force, the "there was no father" shit was a cringy Jesus reference, the chosen one prophecy was super-generic fantasy bullshit, the podracing scene dragged on for too long and had nothing to do with the rest of the plot... and that's just what I remember off the top of my head
Lol, I forgot about the midichlorians, that was among the loudest criticisms back then, how it devalued the whole idea of the force. Christ, the prequels are shut. Imagine how dumb you would need to be to like them.. .
All I'm going to say is, the only people I've encountered who had any real bias against the prequels were people who were terminally online (even then). I'm sure the Something Awful Forums had a few things to say about the prequels, and that's no major surprise, since their entire brand was being cynical about everything, but your normie movie watching people were never particularly offended by the prequels.
A lot of people still thought CGI was a cool novelty back then. For a lot of people, all of that stuff was worth watching just for that. Building an entire character with just computers was a cool prospect to people. It wasn't something people immediately groaned at.
They didn't immediately groan at it, they were super excited for it. They groaned after they had seen it because it turned out shit. Seriously, if you can look at attack of the clones and say anything about it looks good or cool - you are dumb. Why don't you just accept it and live your life happy? You know the saying ignorance is bliss? It means "it's better to be stupid" - smart people say it because being smart often is a burden. They wish they were like you - savor your gift.
>Nobody disliked the prequels until reddit letter media made a hit piece on them
Bro I saw The Phantom Menace in a theater in 1999 when it came out and I thought it sucked back then.
I had just became a teen, loved it, attack of the clones was awful when released, and TPM got worse on rewatches between. Revenge of the SIth is legit a good film, 3rd best
The truth of ligma
how do you respond without sounding mad?
This movie was shit before this scene, but became one of the worst film ever made after it. The case the enter film was built up to was won by yelling and demanding.
Get woke go broke isn't real. It's just confirmation bias.
Traps aren’t gay
The rise of troons and it's consequences has been a disaster for qt traps
The white race should be wiped out after how obedient it showed itself to be to made up science.
Reminder that blacks proportionally got more shots and were more aggressive when it came to others getting shots than any other race. But you know, aggression and darkies are part in parcel.
I heard they took the least shots. I went from hating them to seeing some wisdom in their ways.
It doesn't matter how much money Hollywood loses, queer propaganda won't disappear from your films unless the government steps in and starts outright censoring it.
If they lose enough money they won't be able to afford making films with queer propaganda. Something's gotta give.
Queer propaganda can be inserted into any genre of film, capeshit dying will simply result in studios reorienting to dirt-cheap slice-of-life romcoms and drama shit.
95% of the global population is worthless and serves no purpose but to support a large population, they need to be culled
this is easy to accept, what is hard is that I am one of those people
wrong. The human population behaves like a bell's curve. The more people you have, the more geniuses you have. Forget the base idiots - they are just needed and can do simple labor. It's the peak that you want. Right now, we have more Mozart-level geniuses living on earth than ever before, just because we are many.
We actually dont, the number of geniuses per capita is declining along with average i.q, which peaked about 100 years ago (and before you say it, yes this includes when you control for race)
But he's talking about the total number
in the long term we are sacrificing the total number of geniuses possible by expending resources on keeping useless mouths fed and centrally heated with natural gas
the longer civilization is allowed to continually grow without any sort of population cutbacks the less likely there will be a recovery after the next culling
The holocaust was either heavily exaggerated or fabricated entirely, and the aim was the creation of Israel and the displacement of Palestinians. All this recent shit about how shocking it is that israelites would commit genocide in Gaza after "what happened to them" is laughable. Nothing happened to them, they were put in camps temporarily, and then they used it as a propaganda. Now, big surprise, the same people who are capable of such lies are engaging in genocide.
It's not "surprising" that a bunch of duplicitous monsters are capable of genocide, it is about as on-brand as you can possibly be.
Jannies are a necessary evil.
Jannies need to lighten up sometimes and stop banning me for making jokes
Black folk.
Cinemaphile is filled with Reddit homosexuals and trannies, all the posters that made interesting threads left this shit board years ago.
Firefly and Arrested Development both deserved to be canceled (albeit for different reasons)
Jews make good movies.
speedrunning boring old movies/tv shows is perfectly acceptable
Trans women are valid
Movies and tv are for children
>truthnuke
Movies peaked with LOTR
They peaked in 1999
>that caused a war he could not win and got his country destroyed as a result.
Wow, I wonder why he hated israelites that much?
When Americans wake up Cinemaphile becomes more toxic and politically charged.
if this were true you wouldn't be posting it.
ESG and corporate don't work they way that they've been told
trump lost
Vast majority of people here have elitist attitudes when it comes to film, despite them not having seen enough films to genuinely warrant that elitism.
rusanglogermcucks are Asian gypsies from the ADs that will never be European
moronic buzzword meme
There are some real bullshit "truths" being said in this thread.
can't handle it huh anon
Elizabeth Debicki mogs all their fat femlet waifus.
JigC and Baskin Roberts are good memes.
based
>Hitler was a mentally damaged frick up that caused a war he could not win and got his country destroyed as a result.
Yes, obviously.
>The holocaust happened.
Yep, the arguments in favor of it being a hoax are very weak.
>It will not happen again.
No way to know that.
>White genocide is not real.
It's somewhat real in the sense that there are actually some people out there who literally want fewer white people, but it's probably not real in the sense of there being major political players who have that as a goal.
>Race is not real.
It's very real and can be seen by just looking up the skin tone of people who are world-class sprinters, for example. It's just not real if you are criticizing the straw-man version of "thinking that you can neatly categorize people into one of several racial buckets".
>White genocide is not real.
It's about as real as Palestinian genocide.
THE FUNDS?!
YOU CANT HANDLE THE FUNDS!
Trust fund band baskin roberts is a good meme we’ve had in years.
Keyed is going to be big in 2024
Fishtank and Cinemaphile crossposters are drastically reduced the quality of this board
Barbenheimer was forced as frick
Sneed was only funny when Moeposters existed
LOTR isn't a sacred cow
/misc/ crossposters need to learn to stop taking bait and derailing threads
Janny should delete more threads
Gosling posting stopped being funny the moment reddit/twitter/discord users started coopting everything
Vinceposting was actually funny
Cinemaphile is dead
The Wire sucks and no one likes hip hop
fascism, anti semitism and racism are a product of not understanding the mechanisms of the relationship between capitalism, the state and class society
sorry chuds
Israel is our greatest ally
That Brie is cute
STAR WARS FRICKING SUCKS
GO BACK TO
The book is and will always be better.
/misc/ and Cinemaphile were always a mistake.
BUFFOONERY? YOU CAN'T SANCTION THE BUFFOONERY!
Jar Jar Binks is funny
HAYES DID NOTHING WRONG!
I remember when the movie came out, and how bad-a** everyone (including me) thought he was. But now that I'm much older, I new see him as another pompous bureaucrat who long ago forget the difference between his own interests and that of his country.