They never found the "gay gene" you lying homosexual.
The current consensus is that there is no gay gene. Whether or not someone is gay is entirely environmental. This means that yes, they do 'reproduce' by child abuse and that is the reason gay men only """adopt""" male children
"environmental" can also include the in utero environment - before being actually born
which there is a lot of evidence for it to cause someone to be gay like the well established link between gay people and their fraternal birth order, i.e. the more older (biological) brothers you have the more likely you are to be gay
no, because the birth order effect is only present with sons of the same mother, it is not found when you have step/adopted siblings
4 months ago
Anonymous
no it doesn't
there are countless studies of it
there are even several more specific studies looking at the fraternal birth orders of trannies and sex offenders
Time for your science slop
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441532/
4 months ago
Anonymous
>We further want to highlight that Blanchard & Skorska (2022) completely misconstrued our work by claiming that we wrote there is no evidence for the FBOE in men or women. This is not what we claim, neither in the present study, nor in the preprint. >there is now robust, independent, and high-quality evidence for the FBOE among both men and women.
4 months ago
Anonymous
There's a reason I posted that figure. Scientists bend over backwards in the analysis to deny the role of abuse in creating gayness, but the data speaks for itself
4 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, and there is a ton of data that speaks for the FBOE.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Tiny studies, whose effect diminishes to 0 the larger the study is. It's cope to deny the fact that gay abuse makes more gays, and that this happens in public schools to a wide degree. Incidentally this explains why Black people are more gay per capita. This is by design, TPTB want kids to be beaten and broken and abused in the public system to create good globohomosexual slaves
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Tiny studies >9 million samples >tiny
4 months ago
Anonymous
A collective assessment of all studies (meta-analyses) is not one study
4 months ago
Anonymous
And I'm not talking about a meta-study.
I'm talking about a single study with 9 million samples. A study referenced in the link you posted.
4 months ago
Anonymous
does FBOE manifest in homosexuals who were adopted and never interacted with their older siblings?
And the environment can affect the way genes work, for example during brain development in the womb. It is just peak midwitticism to leap to conclusions like that, your argument sounds scientific but there is more to it than that. I am skeptical of transsexualism, but you are incorrect on that point.
There isn't a gene for a lot of defects thought, like being born blind or moronic
Those things are caused by the environment but it's not like anyone got groomed into being born with 1 leg
moronic almost always means down syndrome, the other diseases that mean "moronic" are also well understood and genetic, and the genes for eyesite are on the X chromosome which is why women are almost never colorblind but can be tetrachromats. What is the point in being such a shameless moronic liar?
>and the genes for eyesite
Which gene makes you blind though? like there's 250 genes that are vaguely associated with it but that's true of being a homosexual as well, which specific one is meant to be The Blindness Gene exactly?
4 months ago
Anonymous
I don't know and I don't care. This is your homosexual argument that is probably based on absolute lies to salvage failing to find "the gay gene" for 4 decades and now failing to disguise that homosexuals are all child molesting shit fetishists.
4 months ago
Anonymous
I don't care if there's a gay gene or not, but it's moronic to say that it's either one singular gene making all the kids gay OR it's entirely social with no in-between, despite how a lot of things are neither genetic nor social and are just biological frick ups
4 months ago
Anonymous
Nobody says that anymore, homosexuals said that for 40 years. You're obviously pro-homosexual so I have no idea what you think you're trying to prove, other than homosexuals reproduce by raping children which everyone knows. Go cope on reddit about getting assfricked you worthless pedophile homosexual.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>what you think you're trying to prove,
That you're moronic and you said something moronic, which given that you've moved to just being a schizo means I've achieved
4 months ago
Anonymous
>actually not only am I a homosexual, I'm also israeli
Is it grooming when you send straigh person to tell every kid in class how being straight is aces and then give them special privileges at the expense of the gay kids?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>then give them special privileges at the expense of the gay kids?
they already got those though
4 months ago
Anonymous
Name one. What special, school and federal backed special privilege is given to them?
4 months ago
Anonymous
tons of potential partners everywhere around them thanks to federal backed right of letting girls be able to go to school
can openly date someone they're attracted to without anyone giving them shit thanks to federal backed right of free speech and whatever entity backs a parent's right to decide who their child can date
4 months ago
Anonymous
>tons of potential partners
Hahahahagaha you aren't owned a partner by society you frickwit homosexual. This really shows you guys are more interested in grooming kids if the first thing you think of is a partner
Name a single school that was allowed to present gay dating with the full backing of the feds. Just name a single modern case.
Protip: you can't.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Allowed to prevent* gay dating
4 months ago
Anonymous
>you aren't owned a partner by society you frickwit homosexual
Isn't this site the birth place of the whole incel "I am entitled to a gf" mentality?
4 months ago
Anonymous
No. Just you.
gay
[...]
It forces a ton of girls in a room with you.
If you can't make a relationship out of all that given to you, you only have yourself to blame.
Not the school's fault nor a privilege that you choose a degenerate lifestyle.
Expecting society to cater to you and make it easy to get your hole pozzed is a delusional privilege that you possess though.
4 months ago
Anonymous
School doesn't give you a mandated bf/gf you stupid homosexual. That speaks volumes of your loser ass.
It forces a ton of girls in a room with you.
If you can't make a relationship out of all that given to you, you only have yourself to blame.
4 months ago
Anonymous
School doesn't give you a mandated bf/gf you stupid homosexual. That speaks volumes of your loser ass.
It wouldn't have to be "a gay gene," it very rarely is just a single catch-all gene for abnormalities. Like with the other Anon's example of congenital blindness, there's dozens of genes involved in the physical development of the eye and the connected optic nerves and the processing areas of the brain, etc., which all interact with one another and can all go wrong in different ways. And that's without even going into the epigenetic side of it
Genetics are mostly bullshit and almost all of it boils down to observing thee conditions of family members and then declaring them genetic while ignoring all other factors. Like how they call diabetes and obesity genetic when they're both caused by bad eating habits that are learned.
>let me just post something dumb and ignore what type 1 diabetes is, this will show everyone my opponents are morons
This is masterful israeli well poisoning. Truly incredible
4 months ago
Anonymous
No one is ever talking about type 1 diabetes any time diabetes is brought up, you're the disingenuous moron here. Genetics are still mostly bullshit.
4 months ago
Anonymous
sure thing shlomo, so you will admit homosexuals reproduce by raping kids then right?
4 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, homosexuals reproduce by raping kids. Homosexuals are far more likely to be victims of childhood sexual abuse for a reason, and it's not because gays aren't child molesters.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Cause gay kids are more likely to attract predators.
Chomos don't go for alpha kids surrounded by friends, they go for the weak effeminate isolated ones who make the easiest prey.
4 months ago
Anonymous
No, the molestation causes the homosexuality. Don't try to flip this shit around, there are no gay children.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Then how do you exist?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>he's blaming the victims for being molested >who are literal kids
Enjoy breathing, someday you'll be hanged from the neck until dead
4 months ago
Anonymous
No, I blame the predators that prey on the weak.
Really not that hard to follow. No reason to act like a woman and cry about victim-blaming the moment you encounter rational thought that hurt your feefees.
>Genetics are mostly bullshit
This fricking website, man. > almost all of it boils down to observing thee conditions of family members and then declaring them genetic
homie, it ain't the 1980s anymore. There are have been dedicated journals for decades publishing research based on gene mapping > Like how they call diabetes and obesity genetic when they're both caused by bad eating habits
a) Type 1 diabetes is congenital, it's Type 2 that's later-onset and caused (primarily) by diet
b) It's not either/or, moron. Your body doesn't just stop doing anything as soon as your born, and genetic factors are going to predispose you to all sorts of stuff. Hence, epigenetics
Why are women almost never colorblind, homosexual anon who surely isn't just repeating some currently in-vogue homosexual propaganda?
>Why are women almost never colorblind
Presumably that would be because the mutant alleles are a) recessive and b) somewhere on the X chromosome. So, as males only inherit 1 X chromosome, that would mean they only have the defective version, whereas females have the dominant, non-mutated copy as well which can then 'override' it
Are we literally at the point where you morons are going to deny *chromosomes*
>Presumably that would be because the mutant alleles are a) recessive and b) somewhere on the X chromosome. So, as males only inherit 1 X chromosome, that would mean they only have the defective version, whereas females have the dominant, non-mutated copy as well which can then 'override' it
Wow so it looks like the other anon's (who is almost definitely you btw) "point about congenital blindness" was absolute bullshit homosexual propaganda he (you) were taught to repeat?
> "point about congenital blindness" was absolute bullshit homosexual propaganda
What? Are you fricking moronic? 'Blindness' (which in itself describes a frickload of different conditions) isn't just 'Colourblindness +1', it's not someone just turning down the blindness dial
e.g. the development of photoreceptor cells is linked to genes PRPH2 (Chromosome 6), GDF6 (Chromosome 8), CRB1 (Chromosome 1), and CRX (Chromosome 19). You could have nothing wrong with your copies of Chromosome 23 (the X and Y sexed chromosomes) and still come out with mutations in those other areas which result in a congenital defect in your photoreceptor cells that render you blind, and vice versa that you can have nothing wrong with any of those 4 but still end up with a mutant X chromosome that leaves you red-green colourblind
>epigenetics
Epigenetics are the dark matter of genetic science.
The mechanisms of epigenetics are observable and well understood you pseud
4 months ago
Anonymous
You know 5 minutes ago you were evidently making a guess about why women are almost never colorblind, now you've suddenly attained a PHD in the subject. Frick off you moronic literal homosexual
4 months ago
Anonymous
>you were evidently making a guess about why women are almost never colorblind,
Because if a congenital condition is predominantly male, then there's one very obvious explanation, because there's one 100% consistent genetic difference between men and women >now you've suddenly attained a PHD
Man, this is secondary school biology. Literally, a 16 year old should have learned this
4 months ago
Anonymous
> Literally, a 16 year old should have learned this
and yet it took me telling you for you to frantically google "does the gene for blindness support homosexuals?" or more likely ask the one moron who passed organic chemistry in your discord how to reply. Again, frick off you moronic literal homosexual.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>it took me telling you for you to frantically google "does the gene for blindness support homosexuals?"
Yeah, I looked up the specifics for the example that was brought up by (You), instead of just adopting your approach of talking out your blown-out butthole. Why are you pretending that's somehow an L for me?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>I was the one who knew what I was talking about in the first place >I was talking out of my ass
homie have a nice day lmao
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Are we literally at the point where you morons are going to deny *chromosomes*
Leftists already started that years ago when they tried to claim a born male can be female
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Presumably that would be because the mutant alleles are a) recessive and b) somewhere on the X chromosome. So, as males only inherit 1 X chromosome, that would mean they only have the defective version, whereas females have the dominant, non-mutated copy as well which can then 'override' it
Wow so it looks like the other anon's (who is almost definitely you btw) "point about congenital blindness" was absolute bullshit homosexual propaganda he (you) were taught to repeat?
4 months ago
Anonymous
>epigenetics
Epigenetics are the dark matter of genetic science.
>Lots of ancient greeks were gay because the gay gene was more common then. >Then it went away for thousands of years. >Then it came back in the present day, and is tripling each generation. >It also only came back in full when gay marriage was decriminalized.
>It's not indoctrination and grooming to be normal.
It is when you try to hammer into kids that being gay is bad instead of just accepting that some people are.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Instead of grooming straight kids with your homosexualry why don't we just set gay kids straight by removing them from their harmful environment?
There's no straight month but every school will fly homosexual flags for gay month
4 months ago
Anonymous
>There's no straight month
It's every month except one.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>Hurry durrr every month
Which one? Black month? Hispanic month? Woman month? Which month do the schools put up straight flags and tell the kids how awesome being straight out and give them special privileges for it?
Disingenuous homosexual.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Black month is the straightest month of them all, white boy.
4 months ago
Anonymous
ya brothas zesty allumsayn
4 months ago
Anonymous
>not know how many homies are on the dl >not making the connection of how ften prepE commercials are stocked with black people to advertise to black people.
Should merge gay month and black month into one at this point.
Only because of evil whitey afraid of a straight black man and trying to sissify every black men.
But you ain't gonna break this buck, cracka.
4 months ago
Anonymous
Only leftists are obsessed with black gays.
4 months ago
Anonymous
>not know how many homies are on the dl >not making the connection of how ften prepE commercials are stocked with black people to advertise to black people.
Should merge gay month and black month into one at this point.
4 months ago
Anonymous
This. It's indoctrinated that you cannot take pride in being white, straight and male despite the majority of advancement in civilization and the very founding of the country being due to white, straight men.
I don't think i've seen this scene but the line seems funny enough the way I imagine Stewie delivering it. But the humor of the joke likely stems from the lines preceding this 4th wall break
I can blame Totally spies for giving me a fetish for beautiful women when I was a child.
Truly a tragedy.
I could have been a maladjusted e-girlcon with no sex drive, but nooo.
I'll never fit in here.
this sort of joke is typically from someone who shuns extrovert shows of masculinity by claiming something is homoerotic.
straight boys view the overly muscular actionfigures/wrestlers/athletes as impressive heros
Friendly reminder that women and emasculated men do not and cannot understand masculinity, and it is part of the israeli agenda to undermine any definition of masculinity apart from homoeroticism and "toxic" behaviors so that the West may be more easily transformed into a mindless herd of goy Black personcattle
I wonder why seth is still voicing these characters. I bet my left nut he doesn't like how they turned all out. Yes the money is good but is he really so detatched from his creation?
Then why not be a singer and drop family guy altogether? Personally i'd feel insulted to voice gay characters over and over and over again, plus no matter how little i cared (which is very little cause family guy before the reboot was an unfunny bore), those cartoons are what defined my life for almost 30 years, i wouldn't stand and watch them all turn into polyamorous schizophrenics and sexual deviants.
You severely overestimate the passion and love that goes into Family Guy. It was literally created as a mockery of animated sitcoms like The Simpsons. Seth keeps doing it because it's easy and he makes a shitload of money, what more do you need?
When do you think he's going to give up trying to win an Emmy? You can always tell which episode is the one they submit, and it never works. Always gets beat out by "Lisa Meets Megan Rapinoe" or some shit like that.
I've seen that meme and I don't understand what's so fricking funny about it.
I guess everyone is so fricking bored they begin to laugh at a droplet that just fell?
I blame porn and their obsession with sex. They can't fathom the idea of two people being friends without sex. They can't understand the idea of taking care of your body if it's not too frick.
you play with dolls, therefore you're a girl trapped in a boy's body and should be put on the titty skittles until you're old enough for sex reassignment surgery
Every time I see a picture of a 3D "trap" it's from a weird angle or they're hiding their face in some way like this guy. Like frick off, nobody's fooled. Anime is not real and traps aren't a thing.
>Gay people are not porn that way.
What's the problem anon ? everyone knows this .
Gay people are born that way, it's scientifically proven
>inb4 "noooooooo that's not a falsifiable statement how could you prooooooooove it"
i thought they were turned like vampires
>It's scientifically proven
They never found the "gay gene" you lying homosexual.
Yes they did. They even had an episode about it.
seth macfarlane is a trust fund band
they never found the fund gene either but that still hasn't stopped people outting the israelites.
>the fund gene
Wtf are you talking about, israelites are completely distinguishable by gene analysis. 23andme even has an ashkenazi page
The current consensus is that there is no gay gene. Whether or not someone is gay is entirely environmental. This means that yes, they do 'reproduce' by child abuse and that is the reason gay men only """adopt""" male children
"environmental" can also include the in utero environment - before being actually born
which there is a lot of evidence for it to cause someone to be gay like the well established link between gay people and their fraternal birth order, i.e. the more older (biological) brothers you have the more likely you are to be gay
fraternal birth order is weak in the literature imho, has like 1 low n study or some shit
no it doesn't
there are countless studies of it
there are even several more specific studies looking at the fraternal birth orders of trannies and sex offenders
sounds more like its more likely that one or more of the older brothers abuses the younger ones.
no, because the birth order effect is only present with sons of the same mother, it is not found when you have step/adopted siblings
Time for your science slop
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10441532/
>We further want to highlight that Blanchard & Skorska (2022) completely misconstrued our work by claiming that we wrote there is no evidence for the FBOE in men or women. This is not what we claim, neither in the present study, nor in the preprint.
>there is now robust, independent, and high-quality evidence for the FBOE among both men and women.
There's a reason I posted that figure. Scientists bend over backwards in the analysis to deny the role of abuse in creating gayness, but the data speaks for itself
Yes, and there is a ton of data that speaks for the FBOE.
Tiny studies, whose effect diminishes to 0 the larger the study is. It's cope to deny the fact that gay abuse makes more gays, and that this happens in public schools to a wide degree. Incidentally this explains why Black people are more gay per capita. This is by design, TPTB want kids to be beaten and broken and abused in the public system to create good globohomosexual slaves
>Tiny studies
>9 million samples
>tiny
A collective assessment of all studies (meta-analyses) is not one study
And I'm not talking about a meta-study.
I'm talking about a single study with 9 million samples. A study referenced in the link you posted.
does FBOE manifest in homosexuals who were adopted and never interacted with their older siblings?
Yes.
>FBOE
fricking butt on emergence?
Why do you assume there being no "gay gene" means it is environmental? This is why midwits should be kept away from science.
Human behaviour comes from genetics or everything else, which scientists sometimes encapsulate with the word environmental
And the environment can affect the way genes work, for example during brain development in the womb. It is just peak midwitticism to leap to conclusions like that, your argument sounds scientific but there is more to it than that. I am skeptical of transsexualism, but you are incorrect on that point.
/thread, it’s literally just lefties demanding children be gay for them because they’re pedophiles
They are willing to abort kids. Talk about how much they hate kids. Go a lifestyle that purposely exclude kids.
But for some goddamn reason they demand access to other people's kids.
There isn't a gene for a lot of defects thought, like being born blind or moronic
Those things are caused by the environment but it's not like anyone got groomed into being born with 1 leg
moronic almost always means down syndrome, the other diseases that mean "moronic" are also well understood and genetic, and the genes for eyesite are on the X chromosome which is why women are almost never colorblind but can be tetrachromats. What is the point in being such a shameless moronic liar?
>and the genes for eyesite
Which gene makes you blind though? like there's 250 genes that are vaguely associated with it but that's true of being a homosexual as well, which specific one is meant to be The Blindness Gene exactly?
I don't know and I don't care. This is your homosexual argument that is probably based on absolute lies to salvage failing to find "the gay gene" for 4 decades and now failing to disguise that homosexuals are all child molesting shit fetishists.
I don't care if there's a gay gene or not, but it's moronic to say that it's either one singular gene making all the kids gay OR it's entirely social with no in-between, despite how a lot of things are neither genetic nor social and are just biological frick ups
Nobody says that anymore, homosexuals said that for 40 years. You're obviously pro-homosexual so I have no idea what you think you're trying to prove, other than homosexuals reproduce by raping children which everyone knows. Go cope on reddit about getting assfricked you worthless pedophile homosexual.
>what you think you're trying to prove,
That you're moronic and you said something moronic, which given that you've moved to just being a schizo means I've achieved
>actually not only am I a homosexual, I'm also israeli
Is it grooming if you send one-legged people to school telling the kids there it's okay when you're one-legged?
Is it grooming when you send straigh person to tell every kid in class how being straight is aces and then give them special privileges at the expense of the gay kids?
>then give them special privileges at the expense of the gay kids?
they already got those though
Name one. What special, school and federal backed special privilege is given to them?
tons of potential partners everywhere around them thanks to federal backed right of letting girls be able to go to school
can openly date someone they're attracted to without anyone giving them shit thanks to federal backed right of free speech and whatever entity backs a parent's right to decide who their child can date
>tons of potential partners
Hahahahagaha you aren't owned a partner by society you frickwit homosexual. This really shows you guys are more interested in grooming kids if the first thing you think of is a partner
Name a single school that was allowed to present gay dating with the full backing of the feds. Just name a single modern case.
Protip: you can't.
Allowed to prevent* gay dating
>you aren't owned a partner by society you frickwit homosexual
Isn't this site the birth place of the whole incel "I am entitled to a gf" mentality?
No. Just you.
gay
Not the school's fault nor a privilege that you choose a degenerate lifestyle.
Expecting society to cater to you and make it easy to get your hole pozzed is a delusional privilege that you possess though.
It forces a ton of girls in a room with you.
If you can't make a relationship out of all that given to you, you only have yourself to blame.
School doesn't give you a mandated bf/gf you stupid homosexual. That speaks volumes of your loser ass.
That just sounds like basic "dont be rude to that unlucky kid" shit
It wouldn't have to be "a gay gene," it very rarely is just a single catch-all gene for abnormalities. Like with the other Anon's example of congenital blindness, there's dozens of genes involved in the physical development of the eye and the connected optic nerves and the processing areas of the brain, etc., which all interact with one another and can all go wrong in different ways. And that's without even going into the epigenetic side of it
Genetics are mostly bullshit and almost all of it boils down to observing thee conditions of family members and then declaring them genetic while ignoring all other factors. Like how they call diabetes and obesity genetic when they're both caused by bad eating habits that are learned.
>let me just post something dumb and ignore what type 1 diabetes is, this will show everyone my opponents are morons
This is masterful israeli well poisoning. Truly incredible
No one is ever talking about type 1 diabetes any time diabetes is brought up, you're the disingenuous moron here. Genetics are still mostly bullshit.
sure thing shlomo, so you will admit homosexuals reproduce by raping kids then right?
Yes, homosexuals reproduce by raping kids. Homosexuals are far more likely to be victims of childhood sexual abuse for a reason, and it's not because gays aren't child molesters.
Cause gay kids are more likely to attract predators.
Chomos don't go for alpha kids surrounded by friends, they go for the weak effeminate isolated ones who make the easiest prey.
No, the molestation causes the homosexuality. Don't try to flip this shit around, there are no gay children.
Then how do you exist?
>he's blaming the victims for being molested
>who are literal kids
Enjoy breathing, someday you'll be hanged from the neck until dead
No, I blame the predators that prey on the weak.
Really not that hard to follow. No reason to act like a woman and cry about victim-blaming the moment you encounter rational thought that hurt your feefees.
>Genetics are mostly bullshit
This fricking website, man.
> almost all of it boils down to observing thee conditions of family members and then declaring them genetic
homie, it ain't the 1980s anymore. There are have been dedicated journals for decades publishing research based on gene mapping
> Like how they call diabetes and obesity genetic when they're both caused by bad eating habits
a) Type 1 diabetes is congenital, it's Type 2 that's later-onset and caused (primarily) by diet
b) It's not either/or, moron. Your body doesn't just stop doing anything as soon as your born, and genetic factors are going to predispose you to all sorts of stuff. Hence, epigenetics
>Why are women almost never colorblind
Presumably that would be because the mutant alleles are a) recessive and b) somewhere on the X chromosome. So, as males only inherit 1 X chromosome, that would mean they only have the defective version, whereas females have the dominant, non-mutated copy as well which can then 'override' it
>MUH PUNNET SQUARES BRO
Holy frick you're moronic.
Are we literally at the point where you morons are going to deny *chromosomes*
> "point about congenital blindness" was absolute bullshit homosexual propaganda
What? Are you fricking moronic? 'Blindness' (which in itself describes a frickload of different conditions) isn't just 'Colourblindness +1', it's not someone just turning down the blindness dial
e.g. the development of photoreceptor cells is linked to genes PRPH2 (Chromosome 6), GDF6 (Chromosome 8), CRB1 (Chromosome 1), and CRX (Chromosome 19). You could have nothing wrong with your copies of Chromosome 23 (the X and Y sexed chromosomes) and still come out with mutations in those other areas which result in a congenital defect in your photoreceptor cells that render you blind, and vice versa that you can have nothing wrong with any of those 4 but still end up with a mutant X chromosome that leaves you red-green colourblind
The mechanisms of epigenetics are observable and well understood you pseud
You know 5 minutes ago you were evidently making a guess about why women are almost never colorblind, now you've suddenly attained a PHD in the subject. Frick off you moronic literal homosexual
>you were evidently making a guess about why women are almost never colorblind,
Because if a congenital condition is predominantly male, then there's one very obvious explanation, because there's one 100% consistent genetic difference between men and women
>now you've suddenly attained a PHD
Man, this is secondary school biology. Literally, a 16 year old should have learned this
> Literally, a 16 year old should have learned this
and yet it took me telling you for you to frantically google "does the gene for blindness support homosexuals?" or more likely ask the one moron who passed organic chemistry in your discord how to reply. Again, frick off you moronic literal homosexual.
>it took me telling you for you to frantically google "does the gene for blindness support homosexuals?"
Yeah, I looked up the specifics for the example that was brought up by (You), instead of just adopting your approach of talking out your blown-out butthole. Why are you pretending that's somehow an L for me?
>I was the one who knew what I was talking about in the first place
>I was talking out of my ass
homie have a nice day lmao
>Are we literally at the point where you morons are going to deny *chromosomes*
Leftists already started that years ago when they tried to claim a born male can be female
>Presumably that would be because the mutant alleles are a) recessive and b) somewhere on the X chromosome. So, as males only inherit 1 X chromosome, that would mean they only have the defective version, whereas females have the dominant, non-mutated copy as well which can then 'override' it
Wow so it looks like the other anon's (who is almost definitely you btw) "point about congenital blindness" was absolute bullshit homosexual propaganda he (you) were taught to repeat?
>epigenetics
Epigenetics are the dark matter of genetic science.
Why are women almost never colorblind, homosexual anon who surely isn't just repeating some currently in-vogue homosexual propaganda?
Being bisexual myself, I can confirm, I wasn’t always like this, I became gayer over time, in no small part due to porn consumption
>born that way
Doorknob
SUS
>Lots of ancient greeks were gay because the gay gene was more common then.
>Then it went away for thousands of years.
>Then it came back in the present day, and is tripling each generation.
>It also only came back in full when gay marriage was decriminalized.
Then why do you homosexuals feel the need to indoctrinate and groom kids to be homosexuals?
Why do you feel the need to indoctrinate and groom gay kids to be straight and lie about what they are?
It's not indoctrination and grooming to be normal.
Why do homosexuals think they are allowed access to other people kids?
>It's not indoctrination and grooming to be normal.
It is when you try to hammer into kids that being gay is bad instead of just accepting that some people are.
Instead of grooming straight kids with your homosexualry why don't we just set gay kids straight by removing them from their harmful environment?
There's no straight month but every school will fly homosexual flags for gay month
>There's no straight month
It's every month except one.
>Hurry durrr every month
Which one? Black month? Hispanic month? Woman month? Which month do the schools put up straight flags and tell the kids how awesome being straight out and give them special privileges for it?
Disingenuous homosexual.
Black month is the straightest month of them all, white boy.
ya brothas zesty allumsayn
Only because of evil whitey afraid of a straight black man and trying to sissify every black men.
But you ain't gonna break this buck, cracka.
Only leftists are obsessed with black gays.
>not know how many homies are on the dl
>not making the connection of how ften prepE commercials are stocked with black people to advertise to black people.
Should merge gay month and black month into one at this point.
This. It's indoctrinated that you cannot take pride in being white, straight and male despite the majority of advancement in civilization and the very founding of the country being due to white, straight men.
Why not reduce the environmental factors that creates gay kids?
>Gay people are not porn that way.
>porn that way
>porn
Nice freudian slip you got there.
Meanwhile American Dad went with the opposite message
You know, the better show and the correct message.
Denied the 'all homophobes are secretly gay' trope as well.
>Denied the 'all homophobes are secretly gay' trope as well.
That's such a crazy good episode too.
Look at him carry that boulder. I bet he wishes it was a man he was carrying
Something something Baskin Roberts
Something something trust fund band.
what?
Some /misc/ gibberish.
/misc/ is usually based and funny, must be some troon garbage
It’s some discord shit a ricecel from reddit spams
wrong chuds
>chuds
Transphobic word
*antisemetic
Yeah, that's right. You give your kids a baskin roberts trust fund band then ask what happened? Yup. Your funded son is on you buddy
I don't think i've seen this scene but the line seems funny enough the way I imagine Stewie delivering it. But the humor of the joke likely stems from the lines preceding this 4th wall break
I agree with this, that's why I always watched totally spies instead of WWE when I was a kid.
I can blame Totally spies for giving me a fetish for beautiful women when I was a child.
Truly a tragedy.
I could have been a maladjusted e-girlcon with no sex drive, but nooo.
I'll never fit in here.
Same ,but it was damn worth it for Sam alone.
I love the French so damn much, bros.
Gave me a lot of fetishes and my love for latex as well
I'd keep Sam
France is responsible for my mind control fetish.
this sort of joke is typically from someone who shuns extrovert shows of masculinity by claiming something is homoerotic.
straight boys view the overly muscular actionfigures/wrestlers/athletes as impressive heros
Ah so sending my kid to drag story hour will make them gay/trans
It's alright. We just need to take gay kids and put them with normal families to set them straight.
playing with dolls is pretty gay in general
I don't care if you cope by calling your dolls 'action figures'
give your kid legos so he gets autism instead like god intended
Friendly reminder that women and emasculated men do not and cannot understand masculinity, and it is part of the israeli agenda to undermine any definition of masculinity apart from homoeroticism and "toxic" behaviors so that the West may be more easily transformed into a mindless herd of goy Black personcattle
I wonder why seth is still voicing these characters. I bet my left nut he doesn't like how they turned all out. Yes the money is good but is he really so detatched from his creation?
he just wants to be a singer I don't think he cares at all about his creations
Then why not be a singer and drop family guy altogether? Personally i'd feel insulted to voice gay characters over and over and over again, plus no matter how little i cared (which is very little cause family guy before the reboot was an unfunny bore), those cartoons are what defined my life for almost 30 years, i wouldn't stand and watch them all turn into polyamorous schizophrenics and sexual deviants.
You severely overestimate the passion and love that goes into Family Guy. It was literally created as a mockery of animated sitcoms like The Simpsons. Seth keeps doing it because it's easy and he makes a shitload of money, what more do you need?
He doesn't give a shit and the show doesn't give a shit. It knows it sucks and the characters are all awful, it leans into it at every opportunity.
Just for the money, I'm pretty sure he said he liked American Dad more than Family Guy as the show went on.
Huh shit I thought it was because the kids got molested
I BETTER EXPLAIN THE JOKE DIRECTLY!
>Yeah, that's trust. You fund your bands ridicoulously baskinortic roberts...
>...and then ask what happened? Yup. Your band son is on you, baskin.
trust fund band
trust fund band slop
When do you think he's going to give up trying to win an Emmy? You can always tell which episode is the one they submit, and it never works. Always gets beat out by "Lisa Meets Megan Rapinoe" or some shit like that.
I swear family guy's characters are so unpleasant to fricking look at, all of them look like some painfully unfunny guy's inner demon's
trust fund band animation
I've seen that meme and I don't understand what's so fricking funny about it.
I guess everyone is so fricking bored they begin to laugh at a droplet that just fell?
It's just some discord teens trying to force a painfully unfunny meme
just making fun of seth and his fanbase that causes seethe because they get their talking points from a cartoon like
No, it's just not funny, you idiots are just trying too hard.
>people are born gay
>but YOU turned them gay by buying them buff action figures
so which is it leftoid
it's only 'homoerotic' to see a male chest if you're gay
>EXPOSED MUSCLES = GAY SEX
why are amerimutts like this?
I'm really tired of lib-turds calling anything that shows men being masculine as homoerotic.
I blame porn and their obsession with sex. They can't fathom the idea of two people being friends without sex. They can't understand the idea of taking care of your body if it's not too frick.
Everything is sex related to them.
Why does the fact that being gay is a choice trigger leftoids so much? I thought the right to choose was important to them.
Because then it proves that they are indoctrinating and grooming kids.
I don't see anything gay about these beautiful black women. They even look less masculine than most black women.
Do guys who get raped/do the raping in jail stay gay when they get out?
i remember grabbing my sisters barbies and licking the boobies
you play with dolls, therefore you're a girl trapped in a boy's body and should be put on the titty skittles until you're old enough for sex reassignment surgery
>muscular strong hero figure
>mind goes straight to homosexuality
Stupid filthy homosexual.
>2010+14
>not having a trap side-piece for when your girlfriend is annoying as frick
>posting on iranian rice and goat cooking forum
Every time I see a picture of a 3D "trap" it's from a weird angle or they're hiding their face in some way like this guy. Like frick off, nobody's fooled. Anime is not real and traps aren't a thing.
>hiding adams apple
>hiding hands
>hiding shoulders
>hiding hips
>hiding feet
yep its a troony
>Buying kids homerotic dolls
>Today
What the frick?
>Gay's are just born that way, you can't hate someone for who they are
>Also they can totally turn gay from being exposed to certain things
Huh?
it's a dumb joke in a cartoon, not a manifesto
>/misc/ is usually based and funny, must be some troon garbage
Yeah if you transheart twitter screenshots and discord/bot spam /misc/ is amazing
Molesting your son is what turns them gay.
Ever read the Bible? Leviticus 18:22
I like Ezekiel 23:20
Why are lgbt people so sex obsessed? Can they think of anything else besides sex?