He totally will dude. I think I got this 6th sense where I like, know where he is all the time, and I think he's coming closer. Better take a hike while you can.
Dude, take that post down. We're not even supposed to be on the computer.
Relax. Benson's not gonna see it.
He totally will dude. I think I got this 6th sense where I like, know where he is all the time, and I think he's coming closer. Better take a hike while you can.
C'mon, man. You're acting crazy.
MORDECAI AND RIGBY! IF YOU DON'T GET OUT OF Cinemaphile AND DO YOUR JOB, YOU'RE FIRED!!
So how come we've never seen any gumball machines with a rainbow of colored balls in them? Would any gumball person or group or that variety be seen as mutts, bastards, defective models? Or perhaps their menagerie of colors would be seen as a status flex, to show off their higher class? Also, since most gumball machines have a red torso, would that mean that Benson and his family are coded to be as normal as possible, or would the Think Positive episode show that their cerebral composition makes them pre-disposed to be ticking-time bombs (literally)?
Look, my guy, i dont know. We’ve seen one other gumball machine not related to Benson who was all yellow. Maybe gumball machines in Regular Show just come in one color.
it just wouldn't be appealing to look at. it'd be too detailed so it'd look off. he doesn't even have "balls" drawn inside his head. it's just a a blob which makes it simple but you still know what it is because of the context of his body
Benson is a good character but he is on his way to become the new Squidward in the sense that aging people think he is relatable and a victim while ignoring all the times he was an unreasonable butthole.
This, Mordecai and Rigby are selfish morons but Benson isn’t a saint.
Aside from the infamous burger eating, there are times he gets too smug at one-upping the duo, give them unfair punishments, outlandish task, or straight up being an ungrateful bastard after getting his life saved from a disastrous event.
>being an ungrateful bastard after getting his life saved from a disastrous event
To be fair, some of those disasters were because of Mordecai and Rigby's moronation, but yea, there were plenty of times they didn't cause the disaster and he acted like a c**t. At least there were a few times that Pops and Skips would call him out, and I think even Muscle Man once told him to frick off with the lashing out.
>on his way to become the new Squidward
Different character. Squidward is a misanthrope who think he's better than everyone while Benson actually try to be social with people.
This, Mordecai and Rigby are selfish morons but Benson isn’t a saint.
Aside from the infamous burger eating, there are times he gets too smug at one-upping the duo, give them unfair punishments, outlandish task, or straight up being an ungrateful bastard after getting his life saved from a disastrous event.
>Aside from the infamous burger eating
Benson was still in the right on that one though.
>He's literally mentally unstable
nah, that's squidward. benson isn't a misanthrope with a huge ego.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Wrong
3 months ago
Anonymous
Benson has no reason to be hateful in bikini bottom.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Long as the likes of SpongeBob don't give him shit like Mordecai and Rigby, and SpongeBob is far more well-meaning than those two
3 months ago
Anonymous
Spongebob is basically like Pops anyway but actually competent. Benson would like working with him.
3 months ago
Anonymous
and he'll own up to his mistakes, even ones that aren't his. While Mordecai would try to fess up at times, Rigby is the one who had to keep egging Benson on by playing off every misdeed like it was nothing, even when it was literally causing universal destruction.
3 months ago
Anonymous
hear hear
3 months ago
Anonymous
Benson's part glass, so if he got swapped with Squiddy, he'd have to shack up with Sandy and go around wearing a space-suit.
they look like a beard but he's puked them out, and it's implied his dispenser is his dick which implies that they also constitute some sort of semen or urine
>Hey guys I just got revived by something called "Blop Arrmmmr" or something like that. I'm like, part tentacle monster now. Anyways Benson, I think I know~~~ a guy who would draw something like that, eeheheheehehehehhehe...
>Whoa whoa whoa, I just got back here. Yah need me to get you some wings to calm yah down? I know a guy who leaves the back door unlocked at Wing Kingdom, so you won't be so grumpy. Will that settle yah down, Butterbean~?
The thought never occured to me...until you mentioned it. I promise not to do it...without delivering on /b/. Fortunately I don't have Amazon prime so it will be a few days before any show up.
They 100% deserved to get Burger Cucked. Those morons would've had all the time in the world if they just did their jobs rather than try to distract Benson with some cheap Holograms which in the end didn't matter and backfired on them way harder than if they just did their fricking jobs.
This, if Benson still gave them the burgers even though they slacked off the whole day, it would have been encouragement for them to slack off even more
He's kinda of a loser butthole that can be sometimes incompetent, but given what usually happens in the park and how lazy and callous Mordocai and Rigby can be, I find him unusually patient. Like sure, he can be tempermental and outright mean sometimes, but you can have way worse options.
I feel like Benson as a character suffers from being a plot device, he has a lot of development throughout the show, with many stories focusing on relational growth between himself, Mordecai and Rigby. But because he is also the main source of conflict(at least initially) that sparks the rest of the episode, when it's not about him or another side character, he has to be reset to his original relationship with the main duo.
Like the rest of the show he suffered from underdeveloped writing. The cartoon also didn't take advantage of the medium except when the zebras ate his balls. The episode where he has to get a cart redeemed under warranty was the best one because he was honest with the bird and rodent instead of just being a jerk.
He gets his time to shine like in the episode where he's a drummer so he's not a total Squidward but most of the time he's a one-dimensional antagonist.
There was also the time his balls spilled out of him after Mordecai and Rigby nearly ran him over. Weird that there was no Terran version of a 2001 Space Odyssey themed Terror Tale where he became a more unhinged Hal 9000 that eventually took over more than the park. Such a missed opportunity...
Is the first Terror Tales the most violent/mature RS episode ever? >evil wizard played menacingly and not for laughs trying to kill everyone >muscle man gets straight up fricking skinned alive >also he uses an actual shotgun >benson throws up >mordecai gets decapitated
>evil wizard played menacingly and not for laughs
Well, I mean he did ultimately reveal he just wanted to egg Rigby house, though it was clearly for the wizard's own amusement and nobody else's
The one where they're telling ghost stories on the truck would have ended with them being driven to hell (hence the driver's face being obscured) but CN said no and so it ended with the piss-weak ending we got.
Eh, them all becoming ghosts was amusing enough. The "surprise, you're in hell" ending is a bit overdone, especially since a lot of the time, it's the conclusion of horror anthologies
>cheeeeyyeeeeck it out rygby. I just found this site called "discord" or whatever and I got into this girls dm's from some pokemon server. she's totally into me dude
>You better listen to him, Mordecai. This "Poke-Gal" could be one with the Microspholipid Race. Their kind can and will alter their vocal cords for nefarious purposes, and very few of them could do so with such a refined tune that even a second of their voices penetrating the eardrums of unwitting travelers can send them into throes of nostalgic delusions, making their bodies ripe for harvesting.
I bet Pops would try to talk kids, simply wanting to talk about old fashioned outdoors themed games, and never realize how he's making himself look like a creep even as he talks about candy and other childish things
>Pops becomes so traumatized at nearly being pegged as a creeper that his soul enters some kind of virtual purgatory for people who let online pressure destroy their confidence/innocence >Rigby and Mordecai are forced to go and save him since Skips is still too tech illiterate, and Muscle Man is getting distracted by mom jokes online
>Except the AI art looks like shit and is easy to detect as AI
LOL I never tried to hide it as not being AI you unbelievable frickstick.. and I could care less what it looks like, the fact it can generate good stuff without the need to get some shit wannabe artist to make shit.. you just mad cause AI can do art
NTA but, I've started to wonder if people hating on artists so much since AI came around is the same reason everyone tries to shit on others work in general. Just seems like spiteful stuff for people enjoying something. It's really weird
3 months ago
Anonymous
im not shitting on artists just the idiots who b***h about AI looking like shit. sure AI isnt perfect but its damn good for the technology we have now.
I worked in Parks for two years and he’s a ridiculously accurate depiction of how managers act. Like we had a ton of seasonal employees and I always thought my Benson was a hard ass but after the shittiest workers get filtered and you spend more time with your boss you realize they’re also a person and can be pretty chill if you put in the effort, almost makes you feel bad for shit talking them behind their backs so much
That's true of a lot of jobs where there's designated jobs, like restaurant work. Good god, the amount of people I've seen bail because their pansy asses can't handle a small stack of greasy sheet pans is ridiculous
unironically a good boss. when i grew up out of my childhood craze for regular show i realized that both rigby and mordecai were troublemakers and autistic grown ass men.
For the most part a pretty cool guy and boss. I think the main butthole move he pulled in the show was getting rid of that game table thin after mordecai and rigby did extra work or something for it. This was also partly due to some personal trauma on his part involving it and he was called out on it by everyone as it being a dick move so he tried to fix it in the end
Yea, he's only been a complete butthole on a few occasions, and even then, he's usually justified since Mordecai and Rigby are suck colossal frick ups that they somehow threaten the cosmos just by doing a simple task like ordering pizza or setting up a dining table
>I think the main butthole move he pulled in the show was getting rid of that game table thin after mordecai and rigby did extra work
Watch the episode again.
It wasn't extra work it was regular work that they were supposed to do but they were busy playing stick hockey. They were demanding extra compensation for doing something they should already do. Honestly, the sense of entitlement of Mordecai and Rigby was appalling. They hit him with the bucket of gum and push him out of his kart. The frustrating part was Skips and Pops overlooking Mordecai and Rigby being an butthole and making it look like everything is his fault.
And what happened in the end? Benson got an insincere thank you from the two and continued to slack off.
Yea, he's only been a complete butthole on a few occasions, and even then, he's usually justified since Mordecai and Rigby are suck colossal frick ups that they somehow threaten the cosmos just by doing a simple task like ordering pizza or setting up a dining table
>only been a complete butthole on a few occasions
You mean once. During the eggscelent challenge. And even then Benson didn't warrant an insult and a punch in the face.
There had been a few times he got irate and threatened their jobs even when they had yet to cause universal level havoc. Sure, you can argue he's getting fed up with the repeated moronicness, but that only justifies things so much before it makes even Benson look moronic because of how often he ultimately forgives Mordecai and Rigby.
>makes even Benson look moronic because of how often he ultimately forgives Mordecai and Rigby.
Stop treating all the situation are the same. He forgives them because a) sometimes the frick up isn't that big b) the other park employees vouch for them c) the writers demand they don't get fired
As you can see 2 of this are out of his hand.
The fricking point is that he could be an butthole sometimes, like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings. He was out of line in that, and only got called out because the mother duck wasn't about to let him yell at her kids, and backed up Mordecai and Rigby since they had done as Benson asked of them.
>like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings
It was done on spur of the moment and was not intentional since he didn't know what was going on. Labeling someone an butthole for a minor impulse does not warrant that.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's pretty assholish since he told them to get rid of the geese, then flip out when the job was done and there happened to be collateral damage.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Again, it was done on spur of the moment and was not intentional since he didn't know what was going on. Labeling someone an butthole for a minor impulse does not warrant that.
Feels like you didn't even read it.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It hardly seems spur of the moment when it's pretty much a routine for him to chew out the two frickups. For fricks sake, you even said he was an butthole once, I just pointed out another instance, get over yourself
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's just a bunch of prostitutes that have dad issues defending him. Every regular show thread is full of them, and I wish they were dead.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>you even said he was an butthole once
Those were different situations. Mordecai and Rigby were doing the challenge during their break. While the geese one is on the job.
It's just a bunch of prostitutes that have dad issues defending him. Every regular show thread is full of them, and I wish they were dead.
Speaking the truth and and allaying ignorance is "dad issues" now? Or do you want this place to be an echo chamber because your head cant handle arguments?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't. Just accept the fact that Benson has had more than one instance of being an butthole
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
3 months ago
Anonymous
That's besides the point. He acted like an butthole and laid into Mordecai and Rigby way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them. You're trying way too hard to split hairs here and excuse it when the bottom line is that he acted out of line and got called out for it.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, you're the one trying to say it wasn't an assholish moment when it totally was. JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping fan if you're this unable to accept that Benson had multiple moments of buttholery
3 months ago
Anonymous
>it wasn't an assholish moment
Because it wasn't. I already explained it and you have no rebuttal. >JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping
Discussing the truth of the situation is simping now? Is this your first debate?
3 months ago
Anonymous
It was, you're the one going "nuh uh" over and over when the fact remains that it was an butthole moment, loads of people consider it an butthole moment, and you lose nothing if you just accept the fact that it was another butthole moment.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It was
It wasnt. >you're the one going "nuh uh" over and over when the fact
But thats you. Look at the reply chain. You keep repeating something I already explained and refuted. Yet you stubbornly hold onto your wrong beliefs. >loads of people consider it an butthole moment,
Appealing to majority is not an argument. >and you lose nothing
You think this is a contest?
3 months ago
Anonymous
Do you? You seem to be awfully too invested in declaring this instance to not be an butthole moment even when I've pointed out that I'm not the only one who considers it to be. Seriously, you lose nothing in just accepting that Benson acted like a dickhead in that episode, because really did act like a jackass and lashed out too harshly at Mordecai, Rigby, and the baby ducklings
3 months ago
Anonymous
>You seem to be awfully too invested
Discussing is wrong? >even when I've pointed out that I'm not the only one who considers it to be
Again, appealing to majority is not an argument. >Seriously, you lose nothing in just accepting
Im not losing anything. But you might learn something. You have not refuted anything I said so far. >because really did act like a jackass and lashed out too harshly at Mordecai, Rigby, and the baby ducklings
Already explained here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It sounds less like discussing and you wanting me to say that I'm wrong about how Benson acted. And who says that arguing to majority isn't an argument? There aren't really any rules in arguing, outside of maybe not attacking someone's character and lobbing ad-homs at them. Also, all that you've 'explained" is that you don't consider what he did made him an butthole.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It sounds less like discussing and you wanting me to say that I'm wrong about how Benson acted.
It is discussing. Sounds like a problem on your end. >And who says that arguing to majority isn't an argument?
Its a basic fallacy when it comes to a debate. Why dont you google it? >Also, all that you've 'explained" is that you don't consider what he did made him an butthole.
Because he wasnt. Making a single mistake doesnt change a character. Just like you. From this conversation you sound ill tempered but im betting you are a good guy when not debating someone
3 months ago
Anonymous
Same can be said of you not wanting to accept that people consider Benson's attitude to be assholish. >you sound ill tempered
No, I don't. But hey, since you're just going to make assumptions and not agree to any concession then I guess this conversation isn't going anywhere.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Same can be said of you not wanting to accept that people consider Benson's attitude to be assholish.
Because he wasnt and I already explained it here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
>you sound ill tempered >No, I don't.
Did you even read the entire post. I was complimenting you you know. Despite the fact the you are calling me names.
>then I guess this conversation isn't going anywhere.
Yeah, you're too upset and that makes you stubborn. Take a break and come back here with a clear mind.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I'm hardly upset, but again if this is what you're gonna do in the so-called "argument", then it's clear you're not taking things as seriously as you were before.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Do you think im trolling you or something? Because im telling you the truth that i am not. I have presented my argument clearly and comprehensively here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
and you havent refuted them since this post
No, you're the one trying to say it wasn't an assholish moment when it totally was. JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping fan if you're this unable to accept that Benson had multiple moments of buttholery
We keep circling back because you are too stubborn. >I'm hardly upset,
Well ok, if you say so. It was my mistake to assume.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant. butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here
Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't. Just accept the fact that Benson has had more than one instance of being an butthole
which I refuted here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
then you replied
That's besides the point. He acted like an butthole and laid into Mordecai and Rigby way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them. You're trying way too hard to split hairs here and excuse it when the bottom line is that he acted out of line and got called out for it.
which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here
No, you're the one trying to say it wasn't an assholish moment when it totally was. JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping fan if you're this unable to accept that Benson had multiple moments of buttholery
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I didn't ignore anything. For fricks sake, the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully. Sure, she doesn't call him an butthole, but it doesn't change the fact that a character in the very show is saying he's acting extremely poorly
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I didn't ignore anything.
Yes you did. You don't seem to understand or is not familiar with the words "intention" and "motive" means. Which are clearly in this two post
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
I keep reminding you of. >the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully
Yes she did and like I said previously here
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Intention/motive hardly matters when acting like an butthole is still acting like an butthole. Just because Benson was mistaken doesn't change the fact that others, such as the mother duck, considered him to be acting like a prick. Good god man, what is so wrong with considering his behavior to be assholish? We've literally established that he has had moments of being such, so it's not like anybody is trying to say Benson is something he absolutely never has been.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Intention/motive hardly matters
There's your mistake then. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
>Just because Benson was mistaken doesn't change the fact that others, such as the mother duck, considered him to be acting like a prick.
The mother duck didn't though she was simply scolding him, you said it yourself
I didn't ignore anything. For fricks sake, the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully. Sure, she doesn't call him an butthole, but it doesn't change the fact that a character in the very show is saying he's acting extremely poorly
Also to add: Being called something doesnt mean you are one. Example from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Good god man, what is so wrong with considering his behavior to be assholish?
Because he wasn't. Why would I agree with you when you are wrong?
3 months ago
Anonymous
It really doesn't when others see you doing something that they think is assholish, which as far as the mother duck was concerned, Benson was being for tearing into Mordecai and Rigby, and above all else, her kids. Just because she didn't call him one doesn't change the fact that his behavior in that moment can be seen as assholish
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It really doesn't when others see you doing something that they think is assholish,
Gonna repeat myself. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
Motives and intentions are tools to enact justice. Which is one of the basic foundations of our society. This is how we provide fair treatment to each individual. Anyone else who judge people without this are animals (pun not intended).
>which as far as the mother duck was concerned
Appealing to authority isn't an argument. It's why I brought up the line from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Just because she didn't call him one
He didn't call him one because he isn't.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Perception is a thing, you know. And if someone sees a person being a jackass or whatever, especially to people they know and even care about, it's not going to matter if the person is a literal saint with nothing be noble intents. Again, it's ridiculous that you can't even consider the fact that Benson acted like an butthole in that situation, got called out for lashing out, and left when he realized he had overreacted.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Perception is a thing, you know. And if someone sees a person being a jackass or whatever
Perception is not limited with just seeing with your eyes. It also means being able to understand abstract concepts like motives and intentions and separate them from an individuals action.
Answer me this: do you think the court of laws only based their decision on what they see with their eyes? Don't they use their heads to deliberate whether a criminal has good or bad motives/intention?
>Again, it's ridiculous
What's more ridiculous is you can't wrap your head around abstract concepts like motive or intention at all.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those, I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake, which Benson did and got called out for. You keep saying I'm ignoring things, and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong when even the mother duck calls him out for acting wrongfully. Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole? It's hardly the worst thing to call a person, especially if you're going to get all preachy about justice and the like when we have people being accused of literal life-destroying accusations. And last time checked, nobody has ever had their life ruined because they were merely called an butthole.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those
You still do. > I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake
They still do.0 >which Benson did and got called out for.
He did made a mistake, that doesn't mean he or his action is considered "assholish". >and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong
Which post did I say that? Why didn't you link it? All I'm asserting was that he did wrongfully reprimand Mordecai, Rigby and the ducklings but that doesn't mean he's an butthole. >Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole?
I don't mind it if it was like in eggscelent challenge but in this case it was different which I already posted here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts. Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole, it's not the worst thing to be called. If anything, it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it. Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment either and had to stretch it. Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance? It's not like it destroys his character or anything to consider him such in that moment.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish". >Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge.
>I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those
You still do. > I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake
They still do.0 >which Benson did and got called out for.
He did made a mistake, that doesn't mean he or his action is considered "assholish". >and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong
Which post did I say that? Why didn't you link it? All I'm asserting was that he did wrongfully reprimand Mordecai, Rigby and the ducklings but that doesn't mean he's an butthole. >Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole?
I don't mind it if it was like in eggscelent challenge but in this case it was different which I already posted here [...]
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not. > it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too.
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge >Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
3 months ago
Anonymous
I literally fricking do, and I will not be told otherwise because I know for a fact that I do understand.
And If we take into account everything he did that in "A bunch of Full grown geese", he was being a massive butthole >Problem shows up and even upsets Pops >Mordecai and Rigby alert him of it >He pushes the job squarely onto them with the threat of termination >When called out by Rigby, he just rage at them >They do job, and he's not happy because of the damages
Yes, the park got wrecked, but he was the one that left the job in the hands of two barely competent employees, which is a pretty butthole thing to do as a boss. Mordecai and Rigby are groundkeepers, not exterminators/pest control. And again, he gets called out for lashing out at the duo and the baby ducks, acknowledges that he's in the wrong, and leaves. Doesn't matter if he thought Mordecai and Rigby were somehow more capable to do the job, since it clearly wasn't done out of confidence for their skills, he just pushed a difficult task onto them and then got angry at the resulting mess.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>I literally fricking do, and I will not be told otherwise because I know for a fact that I do understand.
No you don't. We have argued for 8 hours and you still don't understand. >And If we take into account everything
Now you are moving the goalpost. I thought you were using that time Mother Duck was scolding Benson. What happened to that? >He pushes the job squarely onto them with the threat of termination
Because that's their job. He only threatened when they dont want to do it. >When called out by Rigby, he just rage at them
Call out Benson on what? He was just taunting him. >They do job, and he's not happy because of the damages
Already answered here
Again, it was done on spur of the moment and was not intentional since he didn't know what was going on. Labeling someone an butthole for a minor impulse does not warrant that.
Feels like you didn't even read it.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
>Yes, the park got wrecked, but he was the one that left the job in the hands of two barely competent employees
They are the only one available. >Mordecai and Rigby are groundkeepers, not exterminators/pest control.
Exterminating/pest control within the park is part of their job. >And again, he gets called out for lashing out at the duo and the baby ducks, acknowledges that he's in the wrong, and leaves.
Yes again, you brought it up. And again mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought it up plenty of times
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish". >Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge. [...]
[...] I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not. > it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too. [...]
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge >Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
>I didn't ignore anything.
Yes you did. You don't seem to understand or is not familiar with the words "intention" and "motive" means. Which are clearly in this two post [...] [...] I keep reminding you of. >the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully
Yes she did and like I said previously here [...]
mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
>Doesn't matter if he thought Mordecai and Rigby were somehow more capable to do the job, since it clearly wasn't done out of confidence for their skills, he just pushed a difficult task onto them and then got angry at the resulting mess.
Benson push Mordecai and Rigby to do their job because IT is their job.
Just in case you want to continue. I'll be out for awhile 3-4 hours tops. Can you bump it while I'm gone? Thanks.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness. Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Rigby said Benson is all talk, which he often is. That's hardly taunting, especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator. It probably would have still required ducks since the show runs on absurd things happening at least once per episode and these geese were not normal, but that's besides the point.
Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby, even when they made it clear that the geese weren't to be taken lightly. Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed. He has nobody to blame but himself for being an butthole in that moment. How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery? It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself, and even took out his frustration on the baby ducks, then got called out for scolding children who did their best to help solve a problem he pushed onto his employees.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Hey, im back! Miss me? >Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No you still dont. If you cant understand this concepts, then how are you going to answer? >No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Yes it is moving the goalpost, you are clearly talking about the mother duck yelling as seen by your post here
The fricking point is that he could be an butthole sometimes, like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings. He was out of line in that, and only got called out because the mother duck wasn't about to let him yell at her kids, and backed up Mordecai and Rigby since they had done as Benson asked of them.
>Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness.
Wrong, it is part of their job as long as its within the park. >Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Wrong. Pest control is another job but pest control is part of a groundskeepers job description. >That's hardly taunting,
Then what do you call it? >especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Whats the problem? They are refusing to do a job they are supposed to do. >Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator.
Because its the groundskeepers work. >Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby
None of them knew it was that dangerous, not even Skips warned them that any of it will happen. >Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed.
Again, none of them knew that kind of danger was possible. All of them were surprised about it.
(1/2)
3 months ago
Anonymous
Again, no I am not. And you don't get to tell me what I do and do not fricking understand.
And no, It's not goalpost shifting. We talked about as the entire episode, not just the mother duck shaming Benson. Don't fricking try to twist my words.
He was an butthole, get the frick over yourself already.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Again, no I am not. And you don't get to tell me what I do and do not fricking understand.
Yes you do. Its why you keep getting a wrong conclusion. >And no, It's not goalpost shifting. We talked about as the entire episode, not just the mother duck shaming Benson. Don't fricking try to twist my words.
Its literally on your own post though
The fricking point is that he could be an butthole sometimes, like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings. He was out of line in that, and only got called out because the mother duck wasn't about to let him yell at her kids, and backed up Mordecai and Rigby since they had done as Benson asked of them.
no twist necessary >He was an butthole
He wasnt. Already answered here
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, it isn't.
And in that same post I mentioned the gist of the episode, not just the fricking mother duck calling him out. That's literally not a goalpost shift no matter how much you misuse the term.
He was an butthole. Get over yourself already with this shit. You've said you don't mind calling him an butthole, so why the frick is it such a problem to even CONSIDER him one for this? You're acting way too obtuse about this, it's not like someone said he's heartless or ruthless, neither of which he's ever been. Even in the Eggcellent episode, what he said there only knocked on the door of being either of those things, and he walked it back. But the geese episode he clearly made an ass of himself for no good reason by giving his employees a task that wasn't in their job description whatsoever.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No, it isn't.
Yes it is. >And in that same post I mentioned the gist of the episode, not just the fricking mother duck calling him out.
Thats not the gist of the episode. That was just you only really pointing out the mother duck scene.
The fricking point is that he could be an butthole sometimes, like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings. He was out of line in that, and only got called out because the mother duck wasn't about to let him yell at her kids, and backed up Mordecai and Rigby since they had done as Benson asked of them.
>That's literally not a goalpost shift no matter how much you misuse the term.
It is moving the goalpost. Why do you keep denying your own words. >You've said you don't mind calling him an butthole, so why the frick is it such a problem to even CONSIDER him one for this?
Because you are wrong. You already asked this.
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish". >Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge. [...]
[...] I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not. > it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too. [...]
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge >Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
>You're acting way too obtuse about this,
Thats you though. Its been 12 hours since we started and you still cant comprehend what intetion and motive means. >Even in the Eggcellent episode, what he said there only knocked on the door of being either of those things, and he walked it back.
Dude, I already explained the difference between the geese and eggscelent episode
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>But the geese episode he clearly made an ass of himself for no good reason by giving his employees a task that wasn't in their job description whatsoever.
Already answered.
Hey, im back! Miss me? >Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No you still dont. If you cant understand this concepts, then how are you going to answer? >No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Yes it is moving the goalpost, you are clearly talking about the mother duck yelling as seen by your post here [...] >Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness.
Wrong, it is part of their job as long as its within the park. >Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Wrong. Pest control is another job but pest control is part of a groundskeepers job description. >That's hardly taunting,
Then what do you call it? >especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Whats the problem? They are refusing to do a job they are supposed to do. >Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator.
Because its the groundskeepers work. >Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby
None of them knew it was that dangerous, not even Skips warned them that any of it will happen. >Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed.
Again, none of them knew that kind of danger was possible. All of them were surprised about it.
(1/2)
You seem to keep ignoring everything I wrote.
3 months ago
Anonymous
It isn't. I know the words, you don't get to tell me otherwise.
And I literally said in like the post after that HE FRICKING TOLD THEM TO DO THE JOB. That's literally shows I didn't move the goalpost whatsoever. Stop fricking reaching with this crap. First you bring up some nonsense that consensus somehow doesn't work in arguments despite there being numerous subjects where consensus/people agreeing on something is a component in an argument. Now you're just griping about a goalpost change when I haven't once changed the point that Benson was being an butthole because of HIS own decisions in that episode.
I do know what your fricking precious words mean, I've given you completely adequate reasons why they don't matter in a situation where the character made an ass of themselves. You're the one who can't let it go, you're the one who seems to have some issue contending with even the notion of considering that this was a case of Benson being an butthole. You could have agreed to disagree, as would I, yet you kept pulling stupid shit like saying I don't know words or that I'm changing goalposts. Again, get over yourself with this garbage.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It isn't. I know the words, you don't get to tell me otherwise.
You still dont. >And I literally said in like the post after that HE FRICKING TOLD THEM TO DO THE JOB.
He said that in the same mother duck scene. You never mentioned anything about the sit down in the office not until much later. >That's literally shows I didn't move the goalpost whatsoever.
But you did move the goalpost. >First you bring up some nonsense that consensus somehow doesn't work in arguments despite there being numerous subjects where consensus/people agreeing on something is a component in an argument
Because its true. Appealing to the majority really is not an argument. >Now you're just griping about a goalpost change when I haven't once changed the point
But you did change the goalpost. Funny thing is it didnt help your argument at all. >
I do know what your fricking precious words mean,
No you dont know. Otherwise you wouldnt fall to the same faulty conclusion. >I've given you completely adequate reasons why they don't matter in a situation where the character made an ass of themselves.
And they were all wrong and given you the reason why
>Intention/motive hardly matters
There's your mistake then. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
>Just because Benson was mistaken doesn't change the fact that others, such as the mother duck, considered him to be acting like a prick.
The mother duck didn't though she was simply scolding him, you said it yourself [...] Also to add: Being called something doesnt mean you are one. Example from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Good god man, what is so wrong with considering his behavior to be assholish?
Because he wasn't. Why would I agree with you when you are wrong?
>It really doesn't when others see you doing something that they think is assholish,
Gonna repeat myself. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
Motives and intentions are tools to enact justice. Which is one of the basic foundations of our society. This is how we provide fair treatment to each individual. Anyone else who judge people without this are animals (pun not intended).
>which as far as the mother duck was concerned
Appealing to authority isn't an argument. It's why I brought up the line from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Just because she didn't call him one
He didn't call him one because he isn't.
but you deny it because you dont unserstand. >You're the one who can't let it go,
But thats you. You dont understand thats why you cant let go. >some issue contending with even the notion of considering that this was a case of Benson being an butthole.
Why would I live it alone when you have a wrong answer? That would be a crime not to help you to understand. >You could have agreed to disagree, as would I,
Then why didn't you? >Again, get over yourself with this garbage.
You need to chill. Thats a lot of negative energy.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Same can be said of you for not letting go of the issue even after taking a break from it, and yet, here you are, repeating the same nonsense instead of just accepting that people think Benson is an butthole because god forbid such a "travesty" or whatever
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Same can be said of you
What? >for not letting go of the issue
I have a duty to correct someone who is wrong. Whats your purpose for staying then? >repeating the same nonsense
Just because you dont understand doesnt mean its nonsense. >instead of just accepting that people think Benson
Why would I accept wrong answers? Are there any willing and sane man who would accept wrong answers?
3 months ago
Anonymous
It's hilarious that you think you're the authority on being right about this, meanwhile, I haven't even once said that you're wrong, just that you can't accept the idea of Benson being an butthole in a situation where he was outright pointed out to be in the wrong by characters in the show itself. You really are the one who seems to have way too much stake in the matter, all I've said is that Benson can be butthole, pointed out a reasonable example, and yet you're the one going on about some nonsense about it being "wrong" like it somehow would negatively impact the world.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>It's hilarious that you think you're the authority on being right about this,
Because i am right. >just that you can't accept the idea of Benson being an butthole
I can accept that he can be an butthole though. We have the same conversation before
>I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those
You still do. > I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake
They still do.0 >which Benson did and got called out for.
He did made a mistake, that doesn't mean he or his action is considered "assholish". >and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong
Which post did I say that? Why didn't you link it? All I'm asserting was that he did wrongfully reprimand Mordecai, Rigby and the ducklings but that doesn't mean he's an butthole. >Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole?
I don't mind it if it was like in eggscelent challenge but in this case it was different which I already posted here [...]
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish". >Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge. [...]
[...] I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not. > it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too. [...]
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge >Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
>was outright pointed out to be in the wrong by characters in the show itself.
Yes he was in the wrong but he wasnt assholish. We also discuss this
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
>You really are the one who seems to have way too much stake in the matter,
What stake? >all I've said is that Benson can be butthole, pointed out a reasonable example
You gave a wrong example. >some nonsense about it being "wrong" like it somehow would negatively impact the world.
And here we go. We have come full circle again. I already explained everything to you
>How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery?
Because he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too [...] > It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself
It is mistaken and he didnt made an butthole of himself. See that, you still dont understand motive or intention. You should have get it by now.
(2/2)
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
Look at all those replies and how many times I have to link it to you because you seem to have a short term memory that cant follow a reply chain. And yet you still dont understand.
3 months ago
Anonymous
You think you're right, and while you are entitled to think however you please, that doesn't really mean much when you act like some fragile balance is at stake because you can't accept an opposing opinion, and one about a cartoon character of all things. And there you go again with baseless accusations of things that aren't true because you really don't have any argument. No, you just insist on this and that because "you're right", and then resort to ad-homs and other shit. I've been nothing but civil with you all this time. Never calling you things like a moron, dumbass, or even saying you're trolling. Yet you continue to try and devalue my intelligence with baseless claims because of your own ego.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>because you can't accept an opposing opinion,
Opinion? You were just factually wrong. There was no subjectice ideas or room for interpretation in our conversation. >And there you go again with baseless accusations
What baseless accusation? >because you really don't have any argument.
I have plenty of them
>How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery?
Because he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too [...] > It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself
It is mistaken and he didnt made an butthole of himself. See that, you still dont understand motive or intention. You should have get it by now.
(2/2)
Hey, im back! Miss me? >Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No you still dont. If you cant understand this concepts, then how are you going to answer? >No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Yes it is moving the goalpost, you are clearly talking about the mother duck yelling as seen by your post here [...] >Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness.
Wrong, it is part of their job as long as its within the park. >Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Wrong. Pest control is another job but pest control is part of a groundskeepers job description. >That's hardly taunting,
Then what do you call it? >especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Whats the problem? They are refusing to do a job they are supposed to do. >Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator.
Because its the groundskeepers work. >Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby
None of them knew it was that dangerous, not even Skips warned them that any of it will happen. >Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed.
Again, none of them knew that kind of danger was possible. All of them were surprised about it.
(1/2)
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
>No, you just insist on this and that because "you're right",
Because I am. Why dont you link them to me? >and then resort to ad-homs and other shit.
Where and when? Link them. Ive been cordial this whole time. I even came back for you remember? >Never calling you things like a moron, dumbass, or even saying you're trolling.
But you called me a simp and garbage when im being nice. >Yet you continue to try and devalue my intelligence with baseless claims because of your own ego.
When? I was nice the whole time.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, I'm not wrong. You can think that, but it doesn't make you right. And you're perfectly capable of fricking seeing where you attacked me during the entire "argument", just like how you're able to see that I haven't once attacked you in any way. Yet for someone who seems to have a high opinion of themselves, you're quite fine with insisting that I'm illiterate about words and doing things like changing goalposts when I did no such thing. You keep saying I'm going in circles, yet you're the one who has been responding the exact same way for hours on end with greentext of my words and then saying "you're wrong" or whatever other crap you've repeated.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No, I'm not wrong.
Yes, you are wrong. >You can think that, but it doesn't make you right.
But I am right. >And you're perfectly capable of fricking seeing where you attacked me during the entire "argument",
No, really I dont see it. >you're quite fine with insisting that I'm illiterate about words
I have never used those words. >nd doing things like changing goalposts when I did no such thing.
But you did change the goalpost.
>Again, no I am not. And you don't get to tell me what I do and do not fricking understand.
Yes you do. Its why you keep getting a wrong conclusion. >And no, It's not goalpost shifting. We talked about as the entire episode, not just the mother duck shaming Benson. Don't fricking try to twist my words.
Its literally on your own post though [...] no twist necessary >He was an butthole
He wasnt. Already answered here[...] [...]
>You keep saying I'm going in circles,
And you are. >yet you're the one who has been responding the exact same way for hours on end with greentext of my words and then saying "you're wrong" or whatever other crap you've repeated.
Because you keep asking the same questions and not understanding the amswer. I have to link it back to you because it seems you dont follow our conversation.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, I'm not. You can say I'm wrong all you like, doesn't make it true.
And I do follow the conversation, it's just that your "logic" literally hinges on your personal perception of being right and that I'm somehow wrong. Which is pretty pathetic because you're upset that people have said Benson is an butthole in a particular episode, one where even the episode itself squarely places him in the wrong at its conclusion. But please, keep saying that I somehow don't know words when I never once misused them or done any such thing to indicate that I am ignorant of their meaning. Keep saying I'm wrong as though that will magically change an opinion, one that in now way affects your life or anybody else's for that matter. Keep saying I changed goalposts despite having mentioned from the very beginning details about the entire episode we've argued about. You're the one going in circles, not I.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No, I'm not. You can say I'm wrong all you like, doesn't make it true.
You are wrong and it is true. >And I do follow the conversation
You dont though. Thats why you keep asking the same questions that was already answered. >on your personal perception of being right and that I'm somehow wrong.
Personal? Everything I said was objective. You were wrong since you cant refute any of my claims. >Which is pretty pathetic because you're upset that people have said Benson is an butthole in a particular episode,
When was I upset? >where even the episode itself squarely places him in the wrong at its conclusion
>I didn't ignore anything.
Yes you did. You don't seem to understand or is not familiar with the words "intention" and "motive" means. Which are clearly in this two post [...] [...] I keep reminding you of. >the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully
Yes she did and like I said previously here [...]
mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
we alresdy talked about this. See, you are asking the same question again. >But please, keep saying that I somehow don't know words when I never once misused them or done any such thing to indicate that I am ignorant of their meaning.
You still dont know the words since you still keep giving me wrong answers. > Keep saying I'm wrong as though that will magically change an opinion, one that in now way affects your life or anybody else's for that matter. Keep saying I changed goalposts despite having mentioned from the very beginning details about the entire episode we've argued about.
I will. >You're the one going in circles, not I.
No, we are going in circles. You keep asking the same questions then I gave you the same answer. The problem is you are stubborn and sensitive. You wont admit you are wrong. You feel belittled and insulted but I have done no such a thing in this entire thread. Telling you "you are wrong" or "you dont understand" are not insults.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Just because you think I'm wrong doesn't mean I don't know how certain words work. That literally makes no sense, no matter how many times you incessantly repeat yourself. And it is insulting because you're using that against me for no reason other than to attack me when there are plenty of other ways you could have tackled this so-called argument. No, I haven't asked the same question all the time. Whenever I asked what it matters to you, you keep dodging with non-answers like "You're wrong" and shit like that. Yo have yet to give an actual answer as to why it would be a bad thing to say Benson is an butthole. Saying because it's your opinion is not an answer. Maybe if you said "that would be character defamation/assassination", that'd be one thing, however silly an answer it would be.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>Just because you think I'm wrong doesn't mean I don't know how certain words work. That literally makes no sense, no matter how many times you incessantly repeat yourself.
I dont think you are wrong, you are wrong. >And it is insulting because you're using that against me for no reason other than to attack me when there are plenty of other ways you could have tackled this so-called argument
Its not an insult, stop being sensitive. >No, I haven't asked the same question all the time.
Yes you do. Follow the reply chain. >Whenever I asked what it matters to you, you keep dodging with non-answers like "You're wrong" and shit like that
I keep linking back my replies but you wont even read it. What are you talking about? >Yo have yet to give an actual answer as to why it would be a bad thing to say Benson is an butthole
You asked the same question again. And i am going to link you the answer I gave hours ago
>It sounds less like discussing and you wanting me to say that I'm wrong about how Benson acted.
It is discussing. Sounds like a problem on your end. >And who says that arguing to majority isn't an argument?
Its a basic fallacy when it comes to a debate. Why dont you google it? >Also, all that you've 'explained" is that you don't consider what he did made him an butthole.
Because he wasnt. Making a single mistake doesnt change a character. Just like you. From this conversation you sound ill tempered but im betting you are a good guy when not debating someone
>Same can be said of you not wanting to accept that people consider Benson's attitude to be assholish.
Because he wasnt and I already explained it here [...] [...]
>you sound ill tempered >No, I don't.
Did you even read the entire post. I was complimenting you you know. Despite the fact the you are calling me names.
>then I guess this conversation isn't going anywhere.
Yeah, you're too upset and that makes you stubborn. Take a break and come back here with a clear mind.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action. >way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage? >You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
You have yet to refute any of this. >Saying because it's your opinion is not an answer
Its not an opinion, its a fact.
3 months ago
Anonymous
No, all you've said is literally an opinion. Facts require peer research. Yet you seem to be against anything that involves multiple people because somehow that runs counterproductive to arguments or whatever crap you were mumbling back when you were repeating that chestnut at me. And I'll stop being "sensitive" when you do the same since you're obviously sensitive about people calling Benson an butthole, which reminds me again of the simp comment that was made all those hours ago.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>No, all you've said is literally an opinion.
No they are all facts. >Facts require peer research.
No it doesnt. >Yet you seem to be against anything that involves multiple people.
Your false definiton led you to a false conclusion. >And I'll stop being "sensitive" when you do the same since you're obviously sensitive about people calling Benson an butthole
Good, then do it because I already told you I was fine with Benson being called butthole 3 times already
>I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those
You still do. > I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake
They still do.0 >which Benson did and got called out for.
He did made a mistake, that doesn't mean he or his action is considered "assholish". >and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong
Which post did I say that? Why didn't you link it? All I'm asserting was that he did wrongfully reprimand Mordecai, Rigby and the ducklings but that doesn't mean he's an butthole. >Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole?
I don't mind it if it was like in eggscelent challenge but in this case it was different which I already posted here [...]
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish". >Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge. [...]
[...] I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not. > it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too. [...]
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge >Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
>It's hilarious that you think you're the authority on being right about this,
Because i am right. >just that you can't accept the idea of Benson being an butthole
I can accept that he can be an butthole though. We have the same conversation before[...][...] >was outright pointed out to be in the wrong by characters in the show itself.
Yes he was in the wrong but he wasnt assholish. We also discuss this [...] >You really are the one who seems to have way too much stake in the matter,
What stake? >all I've said is that Benson can be butthole, pointed out a reasonable example
You gave a wrong example. >some nonsense about it being "wrong" like it somehow would negatively impact the world.
And here we go. We have come full circle again. I already explained everything to you [...] [...]
Look at all those replies and how many times I have to link it to you because you seem to have a short term memory that cant follow a reply chain. And yet you still dont understand.
3 months ago
Anonymous
They are opinions. And yes, facts require research. There is literally no fact in the world that was determined and agreed up on by one singular person. None.
Now try actually giving an answer that doesn't require you to repeat yourself like some kind of robot that depends on greentext. I bet you can't, though I'd love to see you try.
3 months ago
Anonymous
>How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery?
Because he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here[...] which I refuted here [...] then you replied[...] which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here[...]
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
> It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself
It is mistaken and he didnt made an butthole of himself. See that, you still dont understand motive or intention. You should have get it by now.
(2/2)
>Well, more like butts, that are totally not mine. These baby ducks (which are totes not the ones from like, a year ago), also imprinted on me dude. Now, if you're wondering about these cookies, they're home-made, gluten free but PACKED with sugar. Want some?
>This sandwich cost me $85.00! >But you said we could order any sandwich we wanted >I did... I said that. Now listen to me as I say this. If you two don't eat this entire sandwich by the end of the day, YOU'RE FIRED!!!
I could see RS having an episode like the Broodwich, just more "family friendly" so to speak. RS and ATHF honestly feel like shows that could have existed in the same universe
His frustration with mordecai and rigby is understandable, but he's mostly using them as an excuse to not deal with his own anger issues, poor social life, and unhealthy obsession with his work. If that wasn't the case, he would've fired both of them ages ago.
To be fair, he was dealing with a kind of Skinner/Chalmers situation with Mr. Maellard, having to watch his back since Maellard would lay into him whenever the old man came around
I don't know. Skinner once told a group of kids they have no prospective futures, while Benson has said some uncalled for things, but usually still means well even if he's often at the end of his wits because most of his staff find new ways to bring armageddon to his place of business. That said, their situations are both quite stressful because of their bosses, though Maellard is definitely worse than Chalmers since he actively does things for his own benefit, whereas Super Nintendo Chalmers just wants to be certain things are running smoothly
He should get fired.
Dude, take that post down. We're not even supposed to be on the computer.
Relax. Benson's not gonna see it.
He totally will dude. I think I got this 6th sense where I like, know where he is all the time, and I think he's coming closer. Better take a hike while you can.
C'mon, man. You're acting crazy.
MORDECAI AND RIGBY! IF YOU DON'T GET OUT OF Cinemaphile AND DO YOUR JOB, YOU'RE FIRED!!
Crap-crap-crap my Dumb Boss Sensor didn't kick in in time. Close those Gadget tabs dude.
He should fire people.
Why did he only have pink gumballs? Don't say animation costs.
His color is pink. He is a pink gumball machine.
So how come we've never seen any gumball machines with a rainbow of colored balls in them? Would any gumball person or group or that variety be seen as mutts, bastards, defective models? Or perhaps their menagerie of colors would be seen as a status flex, to show off their higher class? Also, since most gumball machines have a red torso, would that mean that Benson and his family are coded to be as normal as possible, or would the Think Positive episode show that their cerebral composition makes them pre-disposed to be ticking-time bombs (literally)?
Look, my guy, i dont know. We’ve seen one other gumball machine not related to Benson who was all yellow. Maybe gumball machines in Regular Show just come in one color.
*orange
it just wouldn't be appealing to look at. it'd be too detailed so it'd look off. he doesn't even have "balls" drawn inside his head. it's just a a blob which makes it simple but you still know what it is because of the context of his body
I THINK ITS ABOUT TIME YOU GET BACK TO WORK
>what’s 1+1 and don’t say 2
The older I get the more I understand how and why he was so angry all the time.
>Family guy for kids
Garbage show with unfunny catchpharses like Family shit
Como tan muchacho.
Benson is a good character but he is on his way to become the new Squidward in the sense that aging people think he is relatable and a victim while ignoring all the times he was an unreasonable butthole.
This, Mordecai and Rigby are selfish morons but Benson isn’t a saint.
Aside from the infamous burger eating, there are times he gets too smug at one-upping the duo, give them unfair punishments, outlandish task, or straight up being an ungrateful bastard after getting his life saved from a disastrous event.
>being an ungrateful bastard after getting his life saved from a disastrous event
To be fair, some of those disasters were because of Mordecai and Rigby's moronation, but yea, there were plenty of times they didn't cause the disaster and he acted like a c**t. At least there were a few times that Pops and Skips would call him out, and I think even Muscle Man once told him to frick off with the lashing out.
99% of the time they save him its from something they directly caused kek
>on his way to become the new Squidward
Different character. Squidward is a misanthrope who think he's better than everyone while Benson actually try to be social with people.
>Aside from the infamous burger eating
Benson was still in the right on that one though.
Frick you. Squidward never did anything that assholish. Not in the first three seasons.
What?
Benson is a sadistic prick. Squidward isn't.
Wrong.
The meanest thing squidward ever did was pull a prank, and he apologised. Benson is a mentally insane butthole.
Benson didnt do anything wrong though. Him being an butthole to Mordecai and Rigby are justified. Squidward meanwhile is an butthole for no reason.
Seriously think about it, switch Benson and Squidward's place and bikini bottom would be better off. Meanwhile the park would be in shambles.
>bikini bottom would be better off
Benson would be a hateful, spiteful c**t and ruin the idyllic mood that bikini bottom has.
Wrong
He's literally mentally unstable. Squidward isn't.
>He's literally mentally unstable
nah, that's squidward. benson isn't a misanthrope with a huge ego.
Wrong
Benson has no reason to be hateful in bikini bottom.
Long as the likes of SpongeBob don't give him shit like Mordecai and Rigby, and SpongeBob is far more well-meaning than those two
Spongebob is basically like Pops anyway but actually competent. Benson would like working with him.
and he'll own up to his mistakes, even ones that aren't his. While Mordecai would try to fess up at times, Rigby is the one who had to keep egging Benson on by playing off every misdeed like it was nothing, even when it was literally causing universal destruction.
hear hear
Benson's part glass, so if he got swapped with Squiddy, he'd have to shack up with Sandy and go around wearing a space-suit.
He's a gumball sucking gay
Wouldn't that be Rigby?
Love the character great boss, if he was gay I’d probably end up giving him a blowjob if I worked for him.
Best and worst boss
I didn't realize for the longest time that his gumballs are meant to resemble a beard.
they look like a beard but he's puked them out, and it's implied his dispenser is his dick which implies that they also constitute some sort of semen or urine
Holy soul snatching.
Egad
Now that's a ballgag
CAAAARLOOOOOOOOOOOOOS
now post the one where Benson is being raped by the Gorillaz
Benson: I HATE ANIME! WHO EVER DREW THIS IS FIRED!!!!
>Hey guys I just got revived by something called "Blop Arrmmmr" or something like that. I'm like, part tentacle monster now. Anyways Benson, I think I know~~~ a guy who would draw something like that, eeheheheehehehehhehe...
>FRICK YOU AND FRICK GORILLAZ
>Whoa whoa whoa, I just got back here. Yah need me to get you some wings to calm yah down? I know a guy who leaves the back door unlocked at Wing Kingdom, so you won't be so grumpy. Will that settle yah down, Butterbean~?
Alright. This isn't what I wanted, asked for or expected, but it's what I NEEDED.
Does this also do something for yah?
I was expeting ryoko...but I just bought 10 pounds of fricking gumballs.
What is wrong with me?
Anon, I swear to fricking god if you stick those in your ass...
The thought never occured to me...until you mentioned it. I promise not to do it...without delivering on /b/. Fortunately I don't have Amazon prime so it will be a few days before any show up.
>
Stick your dick in it
He’s a real dick allot of the time and probably should’ve got beat when he ate their burgers but he is cool sometimes
They 100% deserved to get Burger Cucked. Those morons would've had all the time in the world if they just did their jobs rather than try to distract Benson with some cheap Holograms which in the end didn't matter and backfired on them way harder than if they just did their fricking jobs.
This, if Benson still gave them the burgers even though they slacked off the whole day, it would have been encouragement for them to slack off even more
what do regular show and family guy have in common besides the basic elements that every cartoon has
Best not to try and analyze the autism of someone who replies to nearly every post in a thread
He's kinda of a loser butthole that can be sometimes incompetent, but given what usually happens in the park and how lazy and callous Mordocai and Rigby can be, I find him unusually patient. Like sure, he can be tempermental and outright mean sometimes, but you can have way worse options.
I feel like Benson as a character suffers from being a plot device, he has a lot of development throughout the show, with many stories focusing on relational growth between himself, Mordecai and Rigby. But because he is also the main source of conflict(at least initially) that sparks the rest of the episode, when it's not about him or another side character, he has to be reset to his original relationship with the main duo.
Built for Gorrillaz gangrape
By 2d and Russell and futa Noodle
Like the rest of the show he suffered from underdeveloped writing. The cartoon also didn't take advantage of the medium except when the zebras ate his balls. The episode where he has to get a cart redeemed under warranty was the best one because he was honest with the bird and rodent instead of just being a jerk.
He gets his time to shine like in the episode where he's a drummer so he's not a total Squidward but most of the time he's a one-dimensional antagonist.
>except when the zebras ate his balls
they were unicorns dumbass
There was also the time his balls spilled out of him after Mordecai and Rigby nearly ran him over. Weird that there was no Terran version of a 2001 Space Odyssey themed Terror Tale where he became a more unhinged Hal 9000 that eventually took over more than the park. Such a missed opportunity...
The closest thing that we have is the episode with peeps
Uuuuuuuuuggggghhh... why are most of the Terror Tales so laaaaaaaaame?
He was right most of the time and genuinely should have fired mordecai and rigby for being possibly the worst workers of all time.
They missed the perfect chance to make him turn blue instead of red when he broke down crying to show how serious the situation was.
This was a good episode. I love Regular show so much
Same
UGGGGGH it’s another Benson wank thread.
Wank? There's no wanking here.
Speak for yourself
Hehe good one.
Is the first Terror Tales the most violent/mature RS episode ever?
>evil wizard played menacingly and not for laughs trying to kill everyone
>muscle man gets straight up fricking skinned alive
>also he uses an actual shotgun
>benson throws up
>mordecai gets decapitated
>evil wizard played menacingly and not for laughs
Well, I mean he did ultimately reveal he just wanted to egg Rigby house, though it was clearly for the wizard's own amusement and nobody else's
The one where they're telling ghost stories on the truck would have ended with them being driven to hell (hence the driver's face being obscured) but CN said no and so it ended with the piss-weak ending we got.
Eh, them all becoming ghosts was amusing enough. The "surprise, you're in hell" ending is a bit overdone, especially since a lot of the time, it's the conclusion of horror anthologies
Speaking of TToTP, you guys got any new ideas? Preferably ones that aren't based on cursed foods/objects, generic ass monsters and old wife's tales.
>cheeeeyyeeeeck it out rygby. I just found this site called "discord" or whatever and I got into this girls dm's from some pokemon server. she's totally into me dude
>it's a troony dude. girls don't play pokemon
>uhhh no dude she's not a troony . she sent me a vocaroo of her meowing and she's like, totally a chick
>you know voice changers exist right dude? i bet she hasn't even sent you a picture of her pussy yet, you're totally into a troony!
>You better listen to him, Mordecai. This "Poke-Gal" could be one with the Microspholipid Race. Their kind can and will alter their vocal cords for nefarious purposes, and very few of them could do so with such a refined tune that even a second of their voices penetrating the eardrums of unwitting travelers can send them into throes of nostalgic delusions, making their bodies ripe for harvesting.
>i knew it! pokegirls don't exist anymore, mordecai's talking to an ALIEN! we gotta warn him before it's too late!
>Uh... you mean like the one we use for prank calling benson? Wait... where is our voice changer anyways?
>I dunno but... eheheh, I think it's in "good hands" dude. Keep on talking to that "chick," I won't bug yah anymore...
I'LL KILL YOU
I'd like to see you try.
>Hey Mordecai, I need you to- ...what did you do?
You know who else murders their best friend?
MY MOM!
>Not the time Muscle Man.
I bet Pops would try to talk kids, simply wanting to talk about old fashioned outdoors themed games, and never realize how he's making himself look like a creep even as he talks about candy and other childish things
He's gonna need more than a Brain Eraser if he even sees one shitpost.
>Pops becomes so traumatized at nearly being pegged as a creeper that his soul enters some kind of virtual purgatory for people who let online pressure destroy their confidence/innocence
>Rigby and Mordecai are forced to go and save him since Skips is still too tech illiterate, and Muscle Man is getting distracted by mom jokes online
Nice digits. Also, what happened to Fives?
Winds up being the one to save the day since being a ghost, he can bypass some of the barriers where Pops' soul went
I
I like him
So do I!
frick you benson
Theres undoubtedly already a fan made drawing of them giving the bird out there
>Theres undoubtedly already a fan made drawing of them giving the bird out there
so? I can AI generate one in 20 seconds. hence where this came from. its AI. hand drawn artwork is dead get with the times GRANDPA!
Except the AI art looks like shit and is easy to detect as AI, come back when DALL-E 5 becomes a thing
>Except the AI art looks like shit and is easy to detect as AI
LOL I never tried to hide it as not being AI you unbelievable frickstick.. and I could care less what it looks like, the fact it can generate good stuff without the need to get some shit wannabe artist to make shit.. you just mad cause AI can do art
>you just mad cause AI can do art
>implying
anyone with eyes can say it looks like shit even when you throw the AI part away
>anyone with eyes can say it looks like shit even when you throw the AI part away
OH... DONT CARE. I will continue to generate AI shit and post it just to piss you off
>just to piss you off
that's sad
NTA but, I've started to wonder if people hating on artists so much since AI came around is the same reason everyone tries to shit on others work in general. Just seems like spiteful stuff for people enjoying something. It's really weird
im not shitting on artists just the idiots who b***h about AI looking like shit. sure AI isnt perfect but its damn good for the technology we have now.
He got dicked by unicorns
I worked in Parks for two years and he’s a ridiculously accurate depiction of how managers act. Like we had a ton of seasonal employees and I always thought my Benson was a hard ass but after the shittiest workers get filtered and you spend more time with your boss you realize they’re also a person and can be pretty chill if you put in the effort, almost makes you feel bad for shit talking them behind their backs so much
That's true of a lot of jobs where there's designated jobs, like restaurant work. Good god, the amount of people I've seen bail because their pansy asses can't handle a small stack of greasy sheet pans is ridiculous
As time passes he becomes more and more relatable.
I think I remember Regular Show more fondly then any other 2010s cartoon.
I think so too.
unironically a good boss. when i grew up out of my childhood craze for regular show i realized that both rigby and mordecai were troublemakers and autistic grown ass men.
Basement dwellers like the ones roaming Cinemaphile would ever appreciate a boss as nice as Benson.
For the most part a pretty cool guy and boss. I think the main butthole move he pulled in the show was getting rid of that game table thin after mordecai and rigby did extra work or something for it. This was also partly due to some personal trauma on his part involving it and he was called out on it by everyone as it being a dick move so he tried to fix it in the end
Yea, he's only been a complete butthole on a few occasions, and even then, he's usually justified since Mordecai and Rigby are suck colossal frick ups that they somehow threaten the cosmos just by doing a simple task like ordering pizza or setting up a dining table
>I think the main butthole move he pulled in the show was getting rid of that game table thin after mordecai and rigby did extra work
Watch the episode again.
It wasn't extra work it was regular work that they were supposed to do but they were busy playing stick hockey. They were demanding extra compensation for doing something they should already do. Honestly, the sense of entitlement of Mordecai and Rigby was appalling. They hit him with the bucket of gum and push him out of his kart. The frustrating part was Skips and Pops overlooking Mordecai and Rigby being an butthole and making it look like everything is his fault.
And what happened in the end? Benson got an insincere thank you from the two and continued to slack off.
>only been a complete butthole on a few occasions
You mean once. During the eggscelent challenge. And even then Benson didn't warrant an insult and a punch in the face.
There had been a few times he got irate and threatened their jobs even when they had yet to cause universal level havoc. Sure, you can argue he's getting fed up with the repeated moronicness, but that only justifies things so much before it makes even Benson look moronic because of how often he ultimately forgives Mordecai and Rigby.
>makes even Benson look moronic because of how often he ultimately forgives Mordecai and Rigby.
Stop treating all the situation are the same. He forgives them because a) sometimes the frick up isn't that big b) the other park employees vouch for them c) the writers demand they don't get fired
As you can see 2 of this are out of his hand.
The fricking point is that he could be an butthole sometimes, like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings. He was out of line in that, and only got called out because the mother duck wasn't about to let him yell at her kids, and backed up Mordecai and Rigby since they had done as Benson asked of them.
>like the episode with the geese and the return of the baby ducklings
It was done on spur of the moment and was not intentional since he didn't know what was going on. Labeling someone an butthole for a minor impulse does not warrant that.
It's pretty assholish since he told them to get rid of the geese, then flip out when the job was done and there happened to be collateral damage.
Again, it was done on spur of the moment and was not intentional since he didn't know what was going on. Labeling someone an butthole for a minor impulse does not warrant that.
Feels like you didn't even read it.
It hardly seems spur of the moment when it's pretty much a routine for him to chew out the two frickups. For fricks sake, you even said he was an butthole once, I just pointed out another instance, get over yourself
It's just a bunch of prostitutes that have dad issues defending him. Every regular show thread is full of them, and I wish they were dead.
>you even said he was an butthole once
Those were different situations. Mordecai and Rigby were doing the challenge during their break. While the geese one is on the job.
Speaking the truth and and allaying ignorance is "dad issues" now? Or do you want this place to be an echo chamber because your head cant handle arguments?
Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't. Just accept the fact that Benson has had more than one instance of being an butthole
>Dude, behavior doesn't somehow "stop" just because one instance is on the job and the other isn't
Those were different situations because Benson's intention was different. In the eggscelent challenge he was there to "rub it in" Mordecai"s face that he and Rigby should have work. Meanwhile in the geese episode he was; out of ignorance of what transpired, reprimand them in his working state.
Don't tell me you still can't see the difference between those episodes.
That's besides the point. He acted like an butthole and laid into Mordecai and Rigby way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them. You're trying way too hard to split hairs here and excuse it when the bottom line is that he acted out of line and got called out for it.
>That's besides the point
It is the point. Intention is a big part of judging someone's action.
>way too harshly despite the fact that they accomplished the job given to them.
It decimated the entire park. Do you think police and soldiers aren't reprimanded for collateral damage?
>You're trying way too hard to split hairs
But that's you. You don't seem to have any understanding of ethics or morals. You cant see past beyond someone's action and understand their motives and intention.
No, you're the one trying to say it wasn't an assholish moment when it totally was. JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping fan if you're this unable to accept that Benson had multiple moments of buttholery
>it wasn't an assholish moment
Because it wasn't. I already explained it and you have no rebuttal.
>JFC, no wonder that one anon thinks you're some kind of simping
Discussing the truth of the situation is simping now? Is this your first debate?
It was, you're the one going "nuh uh" over and over when the fact remains that it was an butthole moment, loads of people consider it an butthole moment, and you lose nothing if you just accept the fact that it was another butthole moment.
>It was
It wasnt.
>you're the one going "nuh uh" over and over when the fact
But thats you. Look at the reply chain. You keep repeating something I already explained and refuted. Yet you stubbornly hold onto your wrong beliefs.
>loads of people consider it an butthole moment,
Appealing to majority is not an argument.
>and you lose nothing
You think this is a contest?
Do you? You seem to be awfully too invested in declaring this instance to not be an butthole moment even when I've pointed out that I'm not the only one who considers it to be. Seriously, you lose nothing in just accepting that Benson acted like a dickhead in that episode, because really did act like a jackass and lashed out too harshly at Mordecai, Rigby, and the baby ducklings
>You seem to be awfully too invested
Discussing is wrong?
>even when I've pointed out that I'm not the only one who considers it to be
Again, appealing to majority is not an argument.
>Seriously, you lose nothing in just accepting
Im not losing anything. But you might learn something. You have not refuted anything I said so far.
>because really did act like a jackass and lashed out too harshly at Mordecai, Rigby, and the baby ducklings
Already explained here
It sounds less like discussing and you wanting me to say that I'm wrong about how Benson acted. And who says that arguing to majority isn't an argument? There aren't really any rules in arguing, outside of maybe not attacking someone's character and lobbing ad-homs at them. Also, all that you've 'explained" is that you don't consider what he did made him an butthole.
>It sounds less like discussing and you wanting me to say that I'm wrong about how Benson acted.
It is discussing. Sounds like a problem on your end.
>And who says that arguing to majority isn't an argument?
Its a basic fallacy when it comes to a debate. Why dont you google it?
>Also, all that you've 'explained" is that you don't consider what he did made him an butthole.
Because he wasnt. Making a single mistake doesnt change a character. Just like you. From this conversation you sound ill tempered but im betting you are a good guy when not debating someone
Same can be said of you not wanting to accept that people consider Benson's attitude to be assholish.
>you sound ill tempered
No, I don't. But hey, since you're just going to make assumptions and not agree to any concession then I guess this conversation isn't going anywhere.
>Same can be said of you not wanting to accept that people consider Benson's attitude to be assholish.
Because he wasnt and I already explained it here
>you sound ill tempered
>No, I don't.
Did you even read the entire post. I was complimenting you you know. Despite the fact the you are calling me names.
>then I guess this conversation isn't going anywhere.
Yeah, you're too upset and that makes you stubborn. Take a break and come back here with a clear mind.
I'm hardly upset, but again if this is what you're gonna do in the so-called "argument", then it's clear you're not taking things as seriously as you were before.
Do you think im trolling you or something? Because im telling you the truth that i am not. I have presented my argument clearly and comprehensively here
and you havent refuted them since this post
We keep circling back because you are too stubborn.
>I'm hardly upset,
Well ok, if you say so. It was my mistake to assume.
I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant. butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
>I've refuted it just fine with my points about how he acted like an butthole and how him being on or off the clock is irrelevant.
But you didnt. You are using the exact same answer here
which I refuted here
then you replied
which again I disprove. After that you ignored everything starting from here
Now we have come full circle.
>butthole behavior is still butthole behavior.
It wasnt. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
I didn't ignore anything. For fricks sake, the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully. Sure, she doesn't call him an butthole, but it doesn't change the fact that a character in the very show is saying he's acting extremely poorly
>I didn't ignore anything.
Yes you did. You don't seem to understand or is not familiar with the words "intention" and "motive" means. Which are clearly in this two post
I keep reminding you of.
>the mother duck herself says Benson is acting wrongfully
Yes she did and like I said previously here
mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior.
Intention/motive hardly matters when acting like an butthole is still acting like an butthole. Just because Benson was mistaken doesn't change the fact that others, such as the mother duck, considered him to be acting like a prick. Good god man, what is so wrong with considering his behavior to be assholish? We've literally established that he has had moments of being such, so it's not like anybody is trying to say Benson is something he absolutely never has been.
>Intention/motive hardly matters
There's your mistake then. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
>Just because Benson was mistaken doesn't change the fact that others, such as the mother duck, considered him to be acting like a prick.
The mother duck didn't though she was simply scolding him, you said it yourself
Also to add: Being called something doesnt mean you are one. Example from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Good god man, what is so wrong with considering his behavior to be assholish?
Because he wasn't. Why would I agree with you when you are wrong?
It really doesn't when others see you doing something that they think is assholish, which as far as the mother duck was concerned, Benson was being for tearing into Mordecai and Rigby, and above all else, her kids. Just because she didn't call him one doesn't change the fact that his behavior in that moment can be seen as assholish
>It really doesn't when others see you doing something that they think is assholish,
Gonna repeat myself. Intention and motives do matter. How do you think the law decides if a person is guilty of something? That's right, they take his intention and motive into account.
Motives and intentions are tools to enact justice. Which is one of the basic foundations of our society. This is how we provide fair treatment to each individual. Anyone else who judge people without this are animals (pun not intended).
>which as far as the mother duck was concerned
Appealing to authority isn't an argument. It's why I brought up the line from Wreck It Ralph, being called a "bad guy" doesnt mean you are a bad guy.
>Just because she didn't call him one
He didn't call him one because he isn't.
Perception is a thing, you know. And if someone sees a person being a jackass or whatever, especially to people they know and even care about, it's not going to matter if the person is a literal saint with nothing be noble intents. Again, it's ridiculous that you can't even consider the fact that Benson acted like an butthole in that situation, got called out for lashing out, and left when he realized he had overreacted.
>Perception is a thing, you know. And if someone sees a person being a jackass or whatever
Perception is not limited with just seeing with your eyes. It also means being able to understand abstract concepts like motives and intentions and separate them from an individuals action.
Answer me this: do you think the court of laws only based their decision on what they see with their eyes? Don't they use their heads to deliberate whether a criminal has good or bad motives/intention?
>Again, it's ridiculous
What's more ridiculous is you can't wrap your head around abstract concepts like motive or intention at all.
I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those, I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake, which Benson did and got called out for. You keep saying I'm ignoring things, and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong when even the mother duck calls him out for acting wrongfully. Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole? It's hardly the worst thing to call a person, especially if you're going to get all preachy about justice and the like when we have people being accused of literal life-destroying accusations. And last time checked, nobody has ever had their life ruined because they were merely called an butthole.
>I'm not having trouble with the concepts of either of those
You still do.
> I said they don't matter when someone does make a mistake
They still do.0
>which Benson did and got called out for.
He did made a mistake, that doesn't mean he or his action is considered "assholish".
>and yet it sounds like you're saying Benson did absolutely nothing wrong
Which post did I say that? Why didn't you link it? All I'm asserting was that he did wrongfully reprimand Mordecai, Rigby and the ducklings but that doesn't mean he's an butthole.
>Again, what is so wrong with calling him an butthole?
I don't mind it if it was like in eggscelent challenge but in this case it was different which I already posted here
No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts. Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole, it's not the worst thing to be called. If anything, it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it. Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment either and had to stretch it. Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance? It's not like it destroys his character or anything to consider him such in that moment.
>No, I don't, and I'm not going to be told otherwise when I clearly do understand those concepts.
No, you don't understand because you still cant separate and identify action from motive and intention. You still insist a wrongful action is grounds to being "assholish".
>Seriously, there is nothing wrong with thinking Benson was an butthole,
I'm not arguing whether or not its okay to call Benson an butthole. I already told you that I'm fine with Benson being called an butthole like with the eggscelent challenge.
I'm arguing whether or not his action in the geese episode is "assholish" or not. Which is not.
> it would be more sensible to call that moment an butthole moment since he misbehaves, gets called out, and ultimately acknowledges it.
Nope, he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too.
>Whereas the other instance that you brought up, it sounds like you don't even want to consider that to be an butthole moment
I did though with the eggscelent challenge
>Like for real, what's is so wrong with Benson being considered an butthole in this one instance?
Nothing if you were right, but in this specific case you are wrong.
I literally fricking do, and I will not be told otherwise because I know for a fact that I do understand.
And If we take into account everything he did that in "A bunch of Full grown geese", he was being a massive butthole
>Problem shows up and even upsets Pops
>Mordecai and Rigby alert him of it
>He pushes the job squarely onto them with the threat of termination
>When called out by Rigby, he just rage at them
>They do job, and he's not happy because of the damages
Yes, the park got wrecked, but he was the one that left the job in the hands of two barely competent employees, which is a pretty butthole thing to do as a boss. Mordecai and Rigby are groundkeepers, not exterminators/pest control. And again, he gets called out for lashing out at the duo and the baby ducks, acknowledges that he's in the wrong, and leaves. Doesn't matter if he thought Mordecai and Rigby were somehow more capable to do the job, since it clearly wasn't done out of confidence for their skills, he just pushed a difficult task onto them and then got angry at the resulting mess.
>I literally fricking do, and I will not be told otherwise because I know for a fact that I do understand.
No you don't. We have argued for 8 hours and you still don't understand.
>And If we take into account everything
Now you are moving the goalpost. I thought you were using that time Mother Duck was scolding Benson. What happened to that?
>He pushes the job squarely onto them with the threat of termination
Because that's their job. He only threatened when they dont want to do it.
>When called out by Rigby, he just rage at them
Call out Benson on what? He was just taunting him.
>They do job, and he's not happy because of the damages
Already answered here
>Yes, the park got wrecked, but he was the one that left the job in the hands of two barely competent employees
They are the only one available.
>Mordecai and Rigby are groundkeepers, not exterminators/pest control.
Exterminating/pest control within the park is part of their job.
>And again, he gets called out for lashing out at the duo and the baby ducks, acknowledges that he's in the wrong, and leaves.
Yes again, you brought it up. And again mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought it up plenty of times
>Doesn't matter if he thought Mordecai and Rigby were somehow more capable to do the job, since it clearly wasn't done out of confidence for their skills, he just pushed a difficult task onto them and then got angry at the resulting mess.
Benson push Mordecai and Rigby to do their job because IT is their job.
Just in case you want to continue. I'll be out for awhile 3-4 hours tops. Can you bump it while I'm gone? Thanks.
Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness. Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Rigby said Benson is all talk, which he often is. That's hardly taunting, especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator. It probably would have still required ducks since the show runs on absurd things happening at least once per episode and these geese were not normal, but that's besides the point.
Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby, even when they made it clear that the geese weren't to be taken lightly. Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed. He has nobody to blame but himself for being an butthole in that moment. How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery? It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself, and even took out his frustration on the baby ducks, then got called out for scolding children who did their best to help solve a problem he pushed onto his employees.
Hey, im back! Miss me?
>Yes, I fricking do. It is not up for fricking debate, I understand and nobody gets to tell me otherwise
No you still dont. If you cant understand this concepts, then how are you going to answer?
>No, it's not moving the goalpost to point out step by step how Benson was being an butthole. Maybe if were saying only the moment of him yelling at the guys and ducks, but we've been clearly talking about the entire episode as a whole.
Yes it is moving the goalpost, you are clearly talking about the mother duck yelling as seen by your post here
>Wrong, it's not their job to do pest control, their jobs is cleaning and taking care of the park's cleanliness.
Wrong, it is part of their job as long as its within the park.
>Pest control is a whole other thing entirely, and never was a job of theirs in any other case before or after.
Wrong. Pest control is another job but pest control is part of a groundskeepers job description.
>That's hardly taunting,
Then what do you call it?
>especially in this case when he's giving them an ultimatum.
Whats the problem? They are refusing to do a job they are supposed to do.
>Nothing at all implies he couldn't have hired a damn pest control expert or exterminator.
Because its the groundskeepers work.
>Benson acted like an butthole by pushing a dangerous job onto Mordecai and Rigby
None of them knew it was that dangerous, not even Skips warned them that any of it will happen.
>Rather than listen, he just threw a fit at them, then acts all surprised and angry when the park gets destroyed.
Again, none of them knew that kind of danger was possible. All of them were surprised about it.
(1/2)
Again, no I am not. And you don't get to tell me what I do and do not fricking understand.
And no, It's not goalpost shifting. We talked about as the entire episode, not just the mother duck shaming Benson. Don't fricking try to twist my words.
He was an butthole, get the frick over yourself already.
>Again, no I am not. And you don't get to tell me what I do and do not fricking understand.
Yes you do. Its why you keep getting a wrong conclusion.
>And no, It's not goalpost shifting. We talked about as the entire episode, not just the mother duck shaming Benson. Don't fricking try to twist my words.
Its literally on your own post though
no twist necessary
>He was an butthole
He wasnt. Already answered here
No, it isn't.
And in that same post I mentioned the gist of the episode, not just the fricking mother duck calling him out. That's literally not a goalpost shift no matter how much you misuse the term.
He was an butthole. Get over yourself already with this shit. You've said you don't mind calling him an butthole, so why the frick is it such a problem to even CONSIDER him one for this? You're acting way too obtuse about this, it's not like someone said he's heartless or ruthless, neither of which he's ever been. Even in the Eggcellent episode, what he said there only knocked on the door of being either of those things, and he walked it back. But the geese episode he clearly made an ass of himself for no good reason by giving his employees a task that wasn't in their job description whatsoever.
>No, it isn't.
Yes it is.
>And in that same post I mentioned the gist of the episode, not just the fricking mother duck calling him out.
Thats not the gist of the episode. That was just you only really pointing out the mother duck scene.
>That's literally not a goalpost shift no matter how much you misuse the term.
It is moving the goalpost. Why do you keep denying your own words.
>You've said you don't mind calling him an butthole, so why the frick is it such a problem to even CONSIDER him one for this?
Because you are wrong. You already asked this.
>You're acting way too obtuse about this,
Thats you though. Its been 12 hours since we started and you still cant comprehend what intetion and motive means.
>Even in the Eggcellent episode, what he said there only knocked on the door of being either of those things, and he walked it back.
Dude, I already explained the difference between the geese and eggscelent episode
>But the geese episode he clearly made an ass of himself for no good reason by giving his employees a task that wasn't in their job description whatsoever.
Already answered.
You seem to keep ignoring everything I wrote.
It isn't. I know the words, you don't get to tell me otherwise.
And I literally said in like the post after that HE FRICKING TOLD THEM TO DO THE JOB. That's literally shows I didn't move the goalpost whatsoever. Stop fricking reaching with this crap. First you bring up some nonsense that consensus somehow doesn't work in arguments despite there being numerous subjects where consensus/people agreeing on something is a component in an argument. Now you're just griping about a goalpost change when I haven't once changed the point that Benson was being an butthole because of HIS own decisions in that episode.
I do know what your fricking precious words mean, I've given you completely adequate reasons why they don't matter in a situation where the character made an ass of themselves. You're the one who can't let it go, you're the one who seems to have some issue contending with even the notion of considering that this was a case of Benson being an butthole. You could have agreed to disagree, as would I, yet you kept pulling stupid shit like saying I don't know words or that I'm changing goalposts. Again, get over yourself with this garbage.
>It isn't. I know the words, you don't get to tell me otherwise.
You still dont.
>And I literally said in like the post after that HE FRICKING TOLD THEM TO DO THE JOB.
He said that in the same mother duck scene. You never mentioned anything about the sit down in the office not until much later.
>That's literally shows I didn't move the goalpost whatsoever.
But you did move the goalpost.
>First you bring up some nonsense that consensus somehow doesn't work in arguments despite there being numerous subjects where consensus/people agreeing on something is a component in an argument
Because its true. Appealing to the majority really is not an argument.
>Now you're just griping about a goalpost change when I haven't once changed the point
But you did change the goalpost. Funny thing is it didnt help your argument at all.
>
I do know what your fricking precious words mean,
No you dont know. Otherwise you wouldnt fall to the same faulty conclusion.
>I've given you completely adequate reasons why they don't matter in a situation where the character made an ass of themselves.
And they were all wrong and given you the reason why
but you deny it because you dont unserstand.
>You're the one who can't let it go,
But thats you. You dont understand thats why you cant let go.
>some issue contending with even the notion of considering that this was a case of Benson being an butthole.
Why would I live it alone when you have a wrong answer? That would be a crime not to help you to understand.
>You could have agreed to disagree, as would I,
Then why didn't you?
>Again, get over yourself with this garbage.
You need to chill. Thats a lot of negative energy.
Same can be said of you for not letting go of the issue even after taking a break from it, and yet, here you are, repeating the same nonsense instead of just accepting that people think Benson is an butthole because god forbid such a "travesty" or whatever
>Same can be said of you
What?
>for not letting go of the issue
I have a duty to correct someone who is wrong. Whats your purpose for staying then?
>repeating the same nonsense
Just because you dont understand doesnt mean its nonsense.
>instead of just accepting that people think Benson
Why would I accept wrong answers? Are there any willing and sane man who would accept wrong answers?
It's hilarious that you think you're the authority on being right about this, meanwhile, I haven't even once said that you're wrong, just that you can't accept the idea of Benson being an butthole in a situation where he was outright pointed out to be in the wrong by characters in the show itself. You really are the one who seems to have way too much stake in the matter, all I've said is that Benson can be butthole, pointed out a reasonable example, and yet you're the one going on about some nonsense about it being "wrong" like it somehow would negatively impact the world.
>It's hilarious that you think you're the authority on being right about this,
Because i am right.
>just that you can't accept the idea of Benson being an butthole
I can accept that he can be an butthole though. We have the same conversation before
>was outright pointed out to be in the wrong by characters in the show itself.
Yes he was in the wrong but he wasnt assholish. We also discuss this
>You really are the one who seems to have way too much stake in the matter,
What stake?
>all I've said is that Benson can be butthole, pointed out a reasonable example
You gave a wrong example.
>some nonsense about it being "wrong" like it somehow would negatively impact the world.
And here we go. We have come full circle again. I already explained everything to you
Look at all those replies and how many times I have to link it to you because you seem to have a short term memory that cant follow a reply chain. And yet you still dont understand.
You think you're right, and while you are entitled to think however you please, that doesn't really mean much when you act like some fragile balance is at stake because you can't accept an opposing opinion, and one about a cartoon character of all things. And there you go again with baseless accusations of things that aren't true because you really don't have any argument. No, you just insist on this and that because "you're right", and then resort to ad-homs and other shit. I've been nothing but civil with you all this time. Never calling you things like a moron, dumbass, or even saying you're trolling. Yet you continue to try and devalue my intelligence with baseless claims because of your own ego.
>because you can't accept an opposing opinion,
Opinion? You were just factually wrong. There was no subjectice ideas or room for interpretation in our conversation.
>And there you go again with baseless accusations
What baseless accusation?
>because you really don't have any argument.
I have plenty of them
>No, you just insist on this and that because "you're right",
Because I am. Why dont you link them to me?
>and then resort to ad-homs and other shit.
Where and when? Link them. Ive been cordial this whole time. I even came back for you remember?
>Never calling you things like a moron, dumbass, or even saying you're trolling.
But you called me a simp and garbage when im being nice.
>Yet you continue to try and devalue my intelligence with baseless claims because of your own ego.
When? I was nice the whole time.
No, I'm not wrong. You can think that, but it doesn't make you right. And you're perfectly capable of fricking seeing where you attacked me during the entire "argument", just like how you're able to see that I haven't once attacked you in any way. Yet for someone who seems to have a high opinion of themselves, you're quite fine with insisting that I'm illiterate about words and doing things like changing goalposts when I did no such thing. You keep saying I'm going in circles, yet you're the one who has been responding the exact same way for hours on end with greentext of my words and then saying "you're wrong" or whatever other crap you've repeated.
>No, I'm not wrong.
Yes, you are wrong.
>You can think that, but it doesn't make you right.
But I am right.
>And you're perfectly capable of fricking seeing where you attacked me during the entire "argument",
No, really I dont see it.
>you're quite fine with insisting that I'm illiterate about words
I have never used those words.
>nd doing things like changing goalposts when I did no such thing.
But you did change the goalpost.
>You keep saying I'm going in circles,
And you are.
>yet you're the one who has been responding the exact same way for hours on end with greentext of my words and then saying "you're wrong" or whatever other crap you've repeated.
Because you keep asking the same questions and not understanding the amswer. I have to link it back to you because it seems you dont follow our conversation.
No, I'm not. You can say I'm wrong all you like, doesn't make it true.
And I do follow the conversation, it's just that your "logic" literally hinges on your personal perception of being right and that I'm somehow wrong. Which is pretty pathetic because you're upset that people have said Benson is an butthole in a particular episode, one where even the episode itself squarely places him in the wrong at its conclusion. But please, keep saying that I somehow don't know words when I never once misused them or done any such thing to indicate that I am ignorant of their meaning. Keep saying I'm wrong as though that will magically change an opinion, one that in now way affects your life or anybody else's for that matter. Keep saying I changed goalposts despite having mentioned from the very beginning details about the entire episode we've argued about. You're the one going in circles, not I.
>No, I'm not. You can say I'm wrong all you like, doesn't make it true.
You are wrong and it is true.
>And I do follow the conversation
You dont though. Thats why you keep asking the same questions that was already answered.
>on your personal perception of being right and that I'm somehow wrong.
Personal? Everything I said was objective. You were wrong since you cant refute any of my claims.
>Which is pretty pathetic because you're upset that people have said Benson is an butthole in a particular episode,
When was I upset?
>where even the episode itself squarely places him in the wrong at its conclusion
we alresdy talked about this. See, you are asking the same question again.
>But please, keep saying that I somehow don't know words when I never once misused them or done any such thing to indicate that I am ignorant of their meaning.
You still dont know the words since you still keep giving me wrong answers.
> Keep saying I'm wrong as though that will magically change an opinion, one that in now way affects your life or anybody else's for that matter. Keep saying I changed goalposts despite having mentioned from the very beginning details about the entire episode we've argued about.
I will.
>You're the one going in circles, not I.
No, we are going in circles. You keep asking the same questions then I gave you the same answer. The problem is you are stubborn and sensitive. You wont admit you are wrong. You feel belittled and insulted but I have done no such a thing in this entire thread. Telling you "you are wrong" or "you dont understand" are not insults.
Just because you think I'm wrong doesn't mean I don't know how certain words work. That literally makes no sense, no matter how many times you incessantly repeat yourself. And it is insulting because you're using that against me for no reason other than to attack me when there are plenty of other ways you could have tackled this so-called argument. No, I haven't asked the same question all the time. Whenever I asked what it matters to you, you keep dodging with non-answers like "You're wrong" and shit like that. Yo have yet to give an actual answer as to why it would be a bad thing to say Benson is an butthole. Saying because it's your opinion is not an answer. Maybe if you said "that would be character defamation/assassination", that'd be one thing, however silly an answer it would be.
>Just because you think I'm wrong doesn't mean I don't know how certain words work. That literally makes no sense, no matter how many times you incessantly repeat yourself.
I dont think you are wrong, you are wrong.
>And it is insulting because you're using that against me for no reason other than to attack me when there are plenty of other ways you could have tackled this so-called argument
Its not an insult, stop being sensitive.
>No, I haven't asked the same question all the time.
Yes you do. Follow the reply chain.
>Whenever I asked what it matters to you, you keep dodging with non-answers like "You're wrong" and shit like that
I keep linking back my replies but you wont even read it. What are you talking about?
>Yo have yet to give an actual answer as to why it would be a bad thing to say Benson is an butthole
You asked the same question again. And i am going to link you the answer I gave hours ago
You have yet to refute any of this.
>Saying because it's your opinion is not an answer
Its not an opinion, its a fact.
No, all you've said is literally an opinion. Facts require peer research. Yet you seem to be against anything that involves multiple people because somehow that runs counterproductive to arguments or whatever crap you were mumbling back when you were repeating that chestnut at me. And I'll stop being "sensitive" when you do the same since you're obviously sensitive about people calling Benson an butthole, which reminds me again of the simp comment that was made all those hours ago.
>No, all you've said is literally an opinion.
No they are all facts.
>Facts require peer research.
No it doesnt.
>Yet you seem to be against anything that involves multiple people.
Your false definiton led you to a false conclusion.
>And I'll stop being "sensitive" when you do the same since you're obviously sensitive about people calling Benson an butthole
Good, then do it because I already told you I was fine with Benson being called butthole 3 times already
They are opinions. And yes, facts require research. There is literally no fact in the world that was determined and agreed up on by one singular person. None.
Now try actually giving an answer that doesn't require you to repeat yourself like some kind of robot that depends on greentext. I bet you can't, though I'd love to see you try.
>How is him being called out by the mama duck negating his buttholery?
Because he was just wrong at the time. Mistaken in reprimanding someone ≠ assholish behavior. Already brought this up too
> It's not mistaken, he made an butthole of himself
It is mistaken and he didnt made an butthole of himself. See that, you still dont understand motive or intention. You should have get it by now.
(2/2)
I love how his gumballs are designed to look like beard shadow.
When is Mordecai's purple friend going to show up ?
Why does he keep on Besonin'
Now kiss.
yawn
>Hey dudes, does anyone want some lemon- ...huh, so that's happening. Maybe I should pull out the cookies next.
>if those cookies have been anywhere near your butt, Rigby, then YOU'RE FIRED
>Well, more like butts, that are totally not mine. These baby ducks (which are totes not the ones from like, a year ago), also imprinted on me dude. Now, if you're wondering about these cookies, they're home-made, gluten free but PACKED with sugar. Want some?
>Ben Bocquelet single handedly fricked JG Quintel's wife
Gumbros won Regular gays lost
>This sandwich cost me $85.00!
>But you said we could order any sandwich we wanted
>I did... I said that. Now listen to me as I say this. If you two don't eat this entire sandwich by the end of the day, YOU'RE FIRED!!!
I could see RS having an episode like the Broodwich, just more "family friendly" so to speak. RS and ATHF honestly feel like shows that could have existed in the same universe
Does the "Sandwich of Death" episode count?
They're similar, though one was a sandwich that outright kills you, the other was basically an edible portal to some sort of hellscape
what even is this thread
>what even is this thread
No place for you, Flapkek. Begone.
His frustration with mordecai and rigby is understandable, but he's mostly using them as an excuse to not deal with his own anger issues, poor social life, and unhealthy obsession with his work. If that wasn't the case, he would've fired both of them ages ago.
To be fair, he was dealing with a kind of Skinner/Chalmers situation with Mr. Maellard, having to watch his back since Maellard would lay into him whenever the old man came around
Seymour is way more likeable than Benson. He's way more responsible, too.
I don't know. Skinner once told a group of kids they have no prospective futures, while Benson has said some uncalled for things, but usually still means well even if he's often at the end of his wits because most of his staff find new ways to bring armageddon to his place of business. That said, their situations are both quite stressful because of their bosses, though Maellard is definitely worse than Chalmers since he actively does things for his own benefit, whereas Super Nintendo Chalmers just wants to be certain things are running smoothly