>For the making of Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, Winquist says some of the most important machine-learning tools were called “solvers.”
>“A solver, essentially, is just taking a bunch of data — whether that’s the dots on an actor’s face [or] on their mocap suit — and running an algorithm,” Winquist explains. “[It’s] trying to find the least amount of error, essentially trying to match up where those points are in 3D space, to a joint on the actor’s body, their puppet’s body, let’s say. Or in the case of a simulation, a solver is essentially taking where every single point — in the water sim, say — was in the previous frame, looking at its velocity, and saying, ‘Oh, therefore it should be here [in the next frame],’ and applying physics every step of the way.”
Any and all AIs are like this, algorithms, some just appear to be anthropomorphic because they spew out text or pictures instead of highly specialized data that your average Joe doesn't understand.
The AI was rotoscoped over stock footage of Michael Clarke Duncan. As recompense, a portion of the movies net profits will be donated to his living descendants.
It means we live in an AI panic. Special effects have always used algorithms and do all sorts of calculations to check certain things. That's no AI. These people have to clarify that the algorithms they use aren't trying to mimic human intelligence. An AI is simply a human made attempt at mimicking intelligence. These people take the term ''AI'' and they misuse it and then go full defense mode saying their ''AI'' isn't really ''AI''
It's all so strange. Most things people call AI nowadays are not AI at all. AI is just the great evil we need to look out for.
it's not just running calculations, he says in anon's post it is applying physics also. that means it's doing work, and that's just what he told us. Eventually you'll just need a guy to paintbrush the textures and everything else will be PROCEDURALLY AI PERFECT THANKS COME AGAIN
We have 2 major war conflicts with possibility of EU forces joining in, which will skyrocket possibility of nuclear war. We have more slaves than in any other time in history. Half of the world population can't access internet or water and if in 00s it was just some "other people problems" now these 3rd worlders are flooding Europe and USA. We have worse economy world-wide then in great depression. We had unemployment issues even before AI, now with the AI the "unemployment issue" will become "unemployment crisis". World is literally on fire.
Sci-fi midwit redditors just live in some fantasy world where they are a cyberpunk ninjas who jizz in pants when seeing another goyslop like apple VR glasses, but the reality is there won't be a lot of people to use AI to begin with in the future. "hurr durr AI is here to stay CHUD!" yeah it will be literally the only thing to stay in the future. It doesn't include you
It's just artists and rich executives needing to make an issue to pretend to care about. Regular people have real problems and don't care about this shit.
CGI is already taking the jobs of practical effects artists. Photoshop took the jobs of actual artists. Why the frick are these people pretending to be against technology now?
>call not AI ethical AI
Is this how they will normalize AI? Call what is clearly not AI AI so that we associate not AI with real AI thus lowering our guard to real AI.
You could just read the article, you know.
It means "foot in the door".
>For the making of Kingdom of the Planet of the Apes, Winquist says some of the most important machine-learning tools were called “solvers.”
>“A solver, essentially, is just taking a bunch of data — whether that’s the dots on an actor’s face [or] on their mocap suit — and running an algorithm,” Winquist explains. “[It’s] trying to find the least amount of error, essentially trying to match up where those points are in 3D space, to a joint on the actor’s body, their puppet’s body, let’s say. Or in the case of a simulation, a solver is essentially taking where every single point — in the water sim, say — was in the previous frame, looking at its velocity, and saying, ‘Oh, therefore it should be here [in the next frame],’ and applying physics every step of the way.”
>man trying to explain what a basic machine learning algorythm is in a post-transformer world
Is this even AI?
>Any sufficiently advanced algorithm is indistinguishable from AI.
Any and all AIs are like this, algorithms, some just appear to be anthropomorphic because they spew out text or pictures instead of highly specialized data that your average Joe doesn't understand.
But an algorithm isn't a conscious intelligence.
AI is mostly just a buzzword marketing term
imagine spending all your life on propelling legitimate AI research just to end up with normalgays calling simple optimization algorithms "AI"
so isn't this what this sort of software does already? quantizing or whatever? I think they're using the buzzword "AI" to get clicks
>Are you running that algorithm ethically, butthole?
Cope.
It's over for cgi pajeets.
?feature=shared
It means you don't do this kind of ai
This is very ethical as she’s not getting raped and gangbanged
It means "I admit I used AI but I still want to be paid the regular amount"
The AI was rotoscoped over stock footage of Michael Clarke Duncan. As recompense, a portion of the movies net profits will be donated to his living descendants.
>ethical AI
basically someone input the command "dont make the monkeys look like were being racist"
It means we live in an AI panic. Special effects have always used algorithms and do all sorts of calculations to check certain things. That's no AI. These people have to clarify that the algorithms they use aren't trying to mimic human intelligence. An AI is simply a human made attempt at mimicking intelligence. These people take the term ''AI'' and they misuse it and then go full defense mode saying their ''AI'' isn't really ''AI''
It's all so strange. Most things people call AI nowadays are not AI at all. AI is just the great evil we need to look out for.
it's not just running calculations, he says in anon's post it is applying physics also. that means it's doing work, and that's just what he told us. Eventually you'll just need a guy to paintbrush the textures and everything else will be PROCEDURALLY AI PERFECT THANKS COME AGAIN
I hate AI shit so much. Whenever I see a video or something that has AI shit I instantly thumbs down and click away
You won't be changing the world. Just give up the delusions right now. The house always wins.
We have 2 major war conflicts with possibility of EU forces joining in, which will skyrocket possibility of nuclear war. We have more slaves than in any other time in history. Half of the world population can't access internet or water and if in 00s it was just some "other people problems" now these 3rd worlders are flooding Europe and USA. We have worse economy world-wide then in great depression. We had unemployment issues even before AI, now with the AI the "unemployment issue" will become "unemployment crisis". World is literally on fire.
Sci-fi midwit redditors just live in some fantasy world where they are a cyberpunk ninjas who jizz in pants when seeing another goyslop like apple VR glasses, but the reality is there won't be a lot of people to use AI to begin with in the future. "hurr durr AI is here to stay CHUD!" yeah it will be literally the only thing to stay in the future. It doesn't include you
>it was always burnin' since the world's been turnin'
Thanks for the engagement
Is it their kingdom or their planet? Which one is it?
Are they purposefully fricking with us? What a moronic title for a movie.
>Sidewalk of the Street of the House of the City of the Kingdom of the Country of the Continent of the Planet of the Apes
Black personnose and lips
It's just artists and rich executives needing to make an issue to pretend to care about. Regular people have real problems and don't care about this shit.
Prompts: a beautiful day, today
Anything that infringes on major corporations self-determined "rights", but nothing that deletes and destroys culture.
CGI is already taking the jobs of practical effects artists. Photoshop took the jobs of actual artists. Why the frick are these people pretending to be against technology now?
ethical here meaning no we are stealing peoples work or jobs we swear
these people don't give a shit about the soul of the art or even the quality
Why don't you read the article? Why are you asking us?
It means "frick you" but ethically
>people I don’t like using AI
Unethical
>people I like using AI
Ethical
It’s “Safe Horny” all over again
>call not AI ethical AI
Is this how they will normalize AI? Call what is clearly not AI AI so that we associate not AI with real AI thus lowering our guard to real AI.
>What exactly does "ethical AI" mean?
Toilets have been provided.