Cheap to make and women still watch TV, consume advertising and buy the clothes or product placement.
Cinemaphile is rarely interested in this argument but the reason they don't make TV for white males under 60 is that you don't watch it and you don't buy stuff. It isn't your imagination, there really is nothing for you, but then its a mutual contempt at this point, you are no fricking use as a viewer anyway.
Yes intentionally alienate a major demographic that’s keeping the economy afloat, then get mad when they all stop contributing to society, resulting in economic turmoil.
it mainly started in that weird sadboys era culture. a lot of those people used that board so it spread to people outside those circles and into the normies world.
>No one's watching any of our shit, what do we do? >Well sex sells, what about that? >No! If we have attractive women in skimpy outfits the feminist dyke harpies will rake our balls across the coals again! Attractive women trigger them. >What if we just make it a reality show and have attractive, loose female contestants? That way they can't say shit because those are just the women's bodies and they're the ones choosing to dress like hoes."
Of course, I don't watch this shit because I still always find the women ugly and insipid to listen to.
the rise of dating/relationship podcast online
>the rise of dating/relationship podcast online
Dating shows were popular long before
the first real mainstream dating show was only the original bachelor and joe millionaire and that was in 2002,
this show predates that and started in 1999
>roger lodge posting
now thats a name ive not heard in a long, long time
survivor and the bachelor were THE shows to kick off reality tv
lodge was kooky tho
>not femboy island
Frick off
Low cost low effort high yield. Film some desperate people for two weeks and then space the episodes out over 3 months
why is the ugly ass host on the cover? ugly blonde c**t ruined the whole image.
All of the wymyn in the picture are fairly ugly. tbh~~
Cheap to make and women still watch TV, consume advertising and buy the clothes or product placement.
Cinemaphile is rarely interested in this argument but the reason they don't make TV for white males under 60 is that you don't watch it and you don't buy stuff. It isn't your imagination, there really is nothing for you, but then its a mutual contempt at this point, you are no fricking use as a viewer anyway.
>they don't make TV for white males under 60
If they did, Joe Rogan and Flagrant would be Primetime Television instead of Colbert
Yes intentionally alienate a major demographic that’s keeping the economy afloat, then get mad when they all stop contributing to society, resulting in economic turmoil.
holy /misc/y this incel is hopping mad.
that post is true thoughbeit.
Have sex
>Yes intentionally alienate a major demographic that’s keeping the economy afloat, then get mad when they all stop contributing to society
Women, who spend their boyfriends money
I remember seeing fuccboi used as slang on Cinemaphile in like 2012. What bizarre times we live in.
it mainly started in that weird sadboys era culture. a lot of those people used that board so it spread to people outside those circles and into the normies world.
You morons pirate everything so the only shows that succeed are the ones women watch and pay streaming services for.
>Cinemaphile literally is culture at this point
go back to reddi
>using an image created on Cinemaphile to pretend you're better than someone who posts on Cinemaphile
>created on Cinemaphile
moron
We live in a society
>those faces
should be called Fugly Island
>pointy elbows
>Black chicks are hot
This one isn't though...
The last writers strike literally caused the explosion of reality tv. Cheap, quick and easy to shove into a schedule.
reality shows are dirt cheap to make, and is almost entirely propaganda
same reason they started pushing rap music
>What explains the rise of dating shows on TV?
idiocracy manifest
a succulent fall of rome meal
>No one's watching any of our shit, what do we do?
>Well sex sells, what about that?
>No! If we have attractive women in skimpy outfits the feminist dyke harpies will rake our balls across the coals again! Attractive women trigger them.
>What if we just make it a reality show and have attractive, loose female contestants? That way they can't say shit because those are just the women's bodies and they're the ones choosing to dress like hoes."
Of course, I don't watch this shit because I still always find the women ugly and insipid to listen to.
Cheap
Peppy