He's getting older, lives a sedentary life and doesn't take care of himself. Most people go to shit in their late 20s because you can only coast on your youth and highschool/college level of activity for 5-10 years before you need to make a deliberate decision about if you want to end up fat, or stay slim.
why would you even read a summary
the queer tried to >greentext outside of Cinemaphile >durr BEFORE Cinemaphile EMAILS EXIST--
that's not why these queers are using it
hes a dogfricking autist and im not watching his video, but the main problem is that you cant do all the expressive stuff you did in the cartoon with realistic 3D because it looks uncanny as frick
the key distinction - male autism. the post reeks of it
Honestly as a sperg I think learning typical male or female behaviors would be about as difficult either way
To clarify: computer animation, doesn't require the same talent. Different, yes, but something that can be more easily developed and learned. Less natural, more easily trained/learned.
You don't know what you're talking about, you have no personal experience with other modes of art, and you don't understand how commas work.
It took WAY less time with fewer workers to make the second movie. Now maybe that comes down to the fact that no writers were involved in the second film since it was just a shot for shot remake of the first. Supposedly animating the scar betray scene in the first took 3 years alone.
Now just because it was harder to make the first movie doesn't mean the people who made the remake weren't talented, but many experts in the field say that traditional animation techniques are much harder and take much longer to master than learning how to use aftereffects.
cartoon artists nowadays don't actually know how to draw
they would rather BE art than make it
>go to art school to learn how to draw >don't learn anything because the teachers don't know how to draw either >this shit got its start as early as the 60s and only got worse over time
What a cursed field.
can confirm, I have a fine arts degree and no idea how to draw
I don't know about how it used to be, but these days there are art schools with a specific degree for animation.
These programs trach you the basics draw like perspective, figure drawing, and makes you a (hopefully) hireable portfolio at the end.
In my experience, problem is with the students more than the education. gays can't draw, neither are they willing to spend their kwn time improving.
And even if you do end up hireable, it's unlikey you'll go into a 2D project nor would it be your desire to
Usually all background designers or whatever
Also it's fricking ridiculous they have an application system.
Why even bother having an portfolio application if you're just going to accept every bumblefricking shitter that can barely draw stick figures?
I have absolutely no idea what qualities they are looking for when accepting applications, because it fricking ain't drawing skills
>I have absolutely no idea what qualities they are looking for when accepting applications, because it fricking ain't drawing skills
it's literally nepotism and whether you have some quirky ethnic background
you can also be a sex pest, that's very important for admission to art school
It's actually funny to see these people get dejected as some fricking chinese bugman next to them absolutely fricking mogs them in drawing.
Hilarious if it wasn't almost sad to see
>it's literally nepotism and whether you have some quirky ethnic background
>nephew-ism; giving relatives preferential treatment
Are you talking about universities or workplaces? Because in that case it's cronyism and affirmative action.
2 years ago
Anonymous
cronyism and nepotism are functionally equivalent but yeah you described it better >uni or work
it's true in either case
2 years ago
Anonymous
Anons right.
Now that I think of it there is this kid who got in probably because his parents went to the same school.
Can't draw for shit, can't even handle 3d well either.
Honestly feel bad for the guy, he's a good bro but he's honestly not in the right place
2 years ago
Anonymous
Learning to draw properly really isn’t that difficult though, Andrew Loomis books could teach him how to draw pretty quickly.
>I have absolutely no idea what qualities they are looking for when accepting applications, because it fricking ain't drawing skills
it's literally nepotism and whether you have some quirky ethnic background
you can also be a sex pest, that's very important for admission to art school
Art is the first industry that got corrupted by ~~*them*~~. That's why the industry is filled with pseudointellectuals and gave us "modern art" which suck ass. Also it doesn't help that trading art pieces was a prime method of money laundering and criminals general don't care about the quality of art. When other artists see, crappy artists get attention, they copy what they do thinking they'll make money too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNkP-RkZoTs
Can't tell if you're baiting, but if you telling the truth, this makes me legit sad
Even if someone does spend the time and money to learn, they're absolutely fricked.
There is no market for 2D.
Better off learning literally anything else
Traditional animators were a lot better unionized so Disney literally gutted them in the late 2000s once the success of pixar movies gave them a good excuse. Other companies followed quickly after.
They did such a lousy making most of the lion unique. My nephews were having a tough time identifying which lion was which, so they stopped watching and watched Frozen for a millionth time instead
It became accessible to the masses. That's a danger to existing corporations that fear indie start-ups. The solution is to switch the industry to something more expensive.
Modern 3d animation and movies in general heading towards a totally non-stylized "naturalist" look is the literal death of cinema
Nothing expressive whatsoever about its imagery
>Look how much animation has evolved in the last 25 years
But that's the problem. It seems like nothing more than a technical update. And the irony is: in 25 years, this CGI will look outdated while the classic cartoon will still have it's unique charm, heart and soul. In other words: The remake is made with spirit of the time, but the original was made with timeless spirit.
>lion king remake is...LE BAD because....it's JUST IS OKAY! (part 1 of 420)
Damn this homosexual got fat
Man's been taking too much knot.
He's the epitome of skinnyfat
What happened? Alcoholism? Cocaine? Depression? He looks like complete shit.
He's getting older, lives a sedentary life and doesn't take care of himself. Most people go to shit in their late 20s because you can only coast on your youth and highschool/college level of activity for 5-10 years before you need to make a deliberate decision about if you want to end up fat, or stay slim.
The new movie had dull voice overs. None of the humor. None of the flair.
Beyonce was fricking awful. Dull.
Scar was robbed of his majesty and the voice sucked
Timon and pumba were not as funnyb
Dog
Good god I'm not going to read all of that. Summary?
why would you even read a summary
the queer tried to >greentext outside of Cinemaphile
>durr BEFORE Cinemaphile EMAILS EXIST--
that's not why these queers are using it
The only time I've walked out of a theater. Fricking abysmal and soulless.
He just regurgitated everything NitPix said was wrong with the movie and went tism about shit nobody cares about like the triangle...
hes a dogfricking autist and im not watching his video, but the main problem is that you cant do all the expressive stuff you did in the cartoon with realistic 3D because it looks uncanny as frick
everyone knows that anime makes trannies and have subconsciously transitioned away from it
No one mentioned anime you schizo
it's literally in the op you groomer
>animation is anime
ywnb japanese
The Lion King is not anime you moron
shouldn't you be dilating right now?
Projecting hapa troon
>n-no you're the troony
stop watching anime to avoid your depression and get your agp treated
shut the frick up weeb
get better reading comprehension you pedo
>inb4 she's actually 2000 years old
no. you are a pedo
wtf are you talking about?
autist
>t. furry
Anime website.
back to your dilation station freak
Wrong board
Dear god, he even has the writing-style of a woman
the key distinction - male autism. the post reeks of it
Honestly as a sperg I think learning typical male or female behaviors would be about as difficult either way
kys troony
It doesn't require the same degree of talent.
To clarify: computer animation, doesn't require the same talent. Different, yes, but something that can be more easily developed and learned. Less natural, more easily trained/learned.
You don't know what you're talking about, you have no personal experience with other modes of art, and you don't understand how commas work.
It took WAY less time with fewer workers to make the second movie. Now maybe that comes down to the fact that no writers were involved in the second film since it was just a shot for shot remake of the first. Supposedly animating the scar betray scene in the first took 3 years alone.
Now just because it was harder to make the first movie doesn't mean the people who made the remake weren't talented, but many experts in the field say that traditional animation techniques are much harder and take much longer to master than learning how to use aftereffects.
what the flying frick? Are they fricking moronic? Why the frick would they tweet this? Whoever is in charge of that account needs to fricking die
> Why the frick would they tweet this?
You realise that Rotten Tomatoes is shamelessly corrupt and gets paid by studios like Disney to say good things about their films right?
Alive and well
The animation is shit and its inflation fetish is shit.
>he thinks this is traditional animation and not just fancy celshaded 3D
right as always, Roger
The talentbase is dead and no one young is willing to learn
Its over. Same with stop motion puppetry.
Can't tell if you're baiting, but if you telling the truth, this makes me legit sad
>go to art school to learn how to draw
>don't learn anything because the teachers don't know how to draw either
>this shit got its start as early as the 60s and only got worse over time
What a cursed field.
can confirm, I have a fine arts degree and no idea how to draw
I don't know about how it used to be, but these days there are art schools with a specific degree for animation.
These programs trach you the basics draw like perspective, figure drawing, and makes you a (hopefully) hireable portfolio at the end.
In my experience, problem is with the students more than the education. gays can't draw, neither are they willing to spend their kwn time improving.
And even if you do end up hireable, it's unlikey you'll go into a 2D project nor would it be your desire to
Usually all background designers or whatever
Also it's fricking ridiculous they have an application system.
Why even bother having an portfolio application if you're just going to accept every bumblefricking shitter that can barely draw stick figures?
I have absolutely no idea what qualities they are looking for when accepting applications, because it fricking ain't drawing skills
>I have absolutely no idea what qualities they are looking for when accepting applications, because it fricking ain't drawing skills
it's literally nepotism and whether you have some quirky ethnic background
you can also be a sex pest, that's very important for admission to art school
It's actually funny to see these people get dejected as some fricking chinese bugman next to them absolutely fricking mogs them in drawing.
Hilarious if it wasn't almost sad to see
>it's literally nepotism and whether you have some quirky ethnic background
>nephew-ism; giving relatives preferential treatment
Are you talking about universities or workplaces? Because in that case it's cronyism and affirmative action.
cronyism and nepotism are functionally equivalent but yeah you described it better
>uni or work
it's true in either case
Anons right.
Now that I think of it there is this kid who got in probably because his parents went to the same school.
Can't draw for shit, can't even handle 3d well either.
Honestly feel bad for the guy, he's a good bro but he's honestly not in the right place
Learning to draw properly really isn’t that difficult though, Andrew Loomis books could teach him how to draw pretty quickly.
Art is the first industry that got corrupted by ~~*them*~~. That's why the industry is filled with pseudointellectuals and gave us "modern art" which suck ass. Also it doesn't help that trading art pieces was a prime method of money laundering and criminals general don't care about the quality of art. When other artists see, crappy artists get attention, they copy what they do thinking they'll make money too. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNkP-RkZoTs
you do know that scene has a 3d computer background and a more traditional cell animated foreground
Even if someone does spend the time and money to learn, they're absolutely fricked.
There is no market for 2D.
Better off learning literally anything else
cartoon artists nowadays don't actually know how to draw
they would rather BE art than make it
Traditional animators were a lot better unionized so Disney literally gutted them in the late 2000s once the success of pixar movies gave them a good excuse. Other companies followed quickly after.
They did such a lousy making most of the lion unique. My nephews were having a tough time identifying which lion was which, so they stopped watching and watched Frozen for a millionth time instead
i only believe it if they were 4
>devolved*
Animation was never art to begin with.
It became accessible to the masses. That's a danger to existing corporations that fear indie start-ups. The solution is to switch the industry to something more expensive.
It died as the productions leaned more heavily on technology than talent.
Modern 3d animation and movies in general heading towards a totally non-stylized "naturalist" look is the literal death of cinema
Nothing expressive whatsoever about its imagery
It's funny that you're posting anime whilst criticising non-stylised expressiveness.
Computers, cheapness.
>Look how much animation has evolved in the last 25 years
But that's the problem. It seems like nothing more than a technical update. And the irony is: in 25 years, this CGI will look outdated while the classic cartoon will still have it's unique charm, heart and soul. In other words: The remake is made with spirit of the time, but the original was made with timeless spirit.
I'm not a zoophile if the feral animals I jerk off to are cartoons r-right guys?