All the offense meant in the world; that sounds fricking moronic. Diamond Frost is not a fricking Green Lantern Ring. Idiot.
[...]
Loads of grape juice.
I ditto the other Anon, that sounds like the fricking Harry Potter ending. No doubt you'd do something stupid like have the kid named after one of Stark's old friends or a dead X-Man.
The worst part about all this is it's incredibly forced and out of character for Frost.
As was going back to Hellfire Club life again in the first place which was a life she left long ago.
Why is it out of character for Emma? She has been into Stark before. I'd have understood (and preferred) if she was in a serious, committed thing with Scott, but that's not the case now, is it?
I used to think editorial sardonicism for Cyclops went to no further than a historical in-joke, but I suspect Marvel actually hates that guy past such extents nowadays.
>Is this the era of industries shipping, knocking up and marrying up women that are obviously bad for your protag's life long term?
Any do you have any examples of such children in Marvel and DC?
Let's look at this from a different viewpoint. Generally, the idea of these characters getting together & having kids is a bad idea. The addition of a kid either doesn't sell well, gets in the way of the main point of the hero's pathos, or is just another side char forgotten by writers after a couple years but still hanging around in the backstory with the reader wondering what the hell happened to..., what was the point, etc.
Not every book or character can do the Fantastic Four life nor shouldn't. Generally, when the hero has a kid it's a selfish writer's shipping insert because he/she doesn't like how the hero's life is going. Also it's lame time progression in the universe just to look back at it say "oh that happened". To the OP's point, if you're just going to have Tony bang Emma, make it a one-nighter and move it on. No kids. None of this "a step further" malarkey. Tony's banged more than half the women in the MU by now but it wasn't a serious thing.
Luke Cage both married and knocked up the, at the time, self hating ho Jessica Jones. Now they're not happy, well employed and major characters in Marvel. Question is, is Tony a good enough partner to bring the best out of Emma and vice versa as Luke and Jessica proved to be?
This pairing just confuses the shit out of me. Tony is neither subby or autistic enough to be exciting for Emma. It's like Duggan just wanted to make his dollies smooch.
Tony is kinky enough to at least be switch, though I'm sure with the control freak that he is, he's more dom. But if you recall, in morrison's x-men, Emma wanted Cyke to be unleashed and go wild on her. Emma actually wants to be dommed. Or at least that's how she was written when she got together with cyke.
They have very similar personalities, backgrounds and are on the same level of physical beauty. I know morons go >ew, opposites attract muh wholesome polar ships
but in reality it's similarities that make relationships stronger. Tony's a super-handsome super-genius super-billionaire, and when written properly, he's a genuine Alpha. Emma would be attracted to that on a base level. And Emma used to run her own tech company, she's not dumb. Their personalities and goals overlap on various levels. As a pairing, it makes a lot of sense. And it's not like they have any other options. Tony's most stable relationships were Bethany and Rumiko; one's in limbo and the other's dead. Emma was just Scott's sidepiece to keep his dick drained while he waited for Jean to come back. And then there's Namor, I guess. They could be a truly good power couple tbh, if they allow it to progress further and don't kill it during the Krakoa era. And if the rumors are true and they'll recast Stark Post-SW, it wouldn't hurt to ingrain Tony into the X-Men. It makes sense for him to be involved with them anyhow.
>king on rich billionaire orphan control freak >with a mommydomme gf >Oh no. OH NO, I know how this goes. RUN!
How does it go?
3 months ago
Anonymous
11 issues of closeups of people talking that ends in an anticlimatic last issue.
3 months ago
Anonymous
She has to dress up as a maternal figure and what him sucks on her boobs while she gives him a handjob on the penis.
11 issues of closeups of people talking that ends in an anticlimatic last issue.
Why?
3 months ago
Anonymous
>why?
I feel like it's more accurate putdown of his past couple works.
3 months ago
Anonymous
Okay here's the thing about comic book offices. I usually don't follow the history of who's the author of the comic on needed I just followed What happens in the comic. Probably because I Read Manga for like 10 years before I started reading comic books.
3 months ago
Anonymous
But you can understand the intent of the reference right?
That being Tom King is a boring writer of course.
>Emma would be attracted to that on a base level >Their personalities and goals overlap on various levels >As a pairing, it makes a lot of sense
That's some yada yada yada right there.
Because Emma Frost has already got kids that are creepy little monsters who look like her and she has proven to be the worst mother on earth to them, and to any kid for that matter.
idk but a Stark child who can make his body it's own armor kinda writes itself... bad fanfiction potentially.
All the offense meant in the world; that sounds fricking moronic. Diamond Frost is not a fricking Green Lantern Ring. Idiot.
Loads of grape juice.
>grape juice
GAPE JUICE
'tis also that
So does the child really belong to Purple Drank Man?
I ditto the other Anon, that sounds like the fricking Harry Potter ending. No doubt you'd do something stupid like have the kid named after one of Stark's old friends or a dead X-Man.
No, I would make a political statement that even I don't understand by naming their child Techno Mechanicus or X Æ A-Xii.
Is this the era of industries shipping, knocking up and marrying up women that are obviously bad for your protag's life long term?
The worst part about all this is it's incredibly forced and out of character for Frost.
As was going back to Hellfire Club life again in the first place which was a life she left long ago.
Lmao keep seething morrison
What are you a homosexual? Morrison is the one who fricked up her character before anybody else.
Why is it out of character for Emma? She has been into Stark before. I'd have understood (and preferred) if she was in a serious, committed thing with Scott, but that's not the case now, is it?
Scott is too busy licking the dingleberries out of Logan's hairy man ass.
I used to think editorial sardonicism for Cyclops went to no further than a historical in-joke, but I suspect Marvel actually hates that guy past such extents nowadays.
>Is this the era of industries shipping, knocking up and marrying up women that are obviously bad for your protag's life long term?
Any do you have any examples of such children in Marvel and DC?
Let's look at this from a different viewpoint. Generally, the idea of these characters getting together & having kids is a bad idea. The addition of a kid either doesn't sell well, gets in the way of the main point of the hero's pathos, or is just another side char forgotten by writers after a couple years but still hanging around in the backstory with the reader wondering what the hell happened to..., what was the point, etc.
Not every book or character can do the Fantastic Four life nor shouldn't. Generally, when the hero has a kid it's a selfish writer's shipping insert because he/she doesn't like how the hero's life is going. Also it's lame time progression in the universe just to look back at it say "oh that happened". To the OP's point, if you're just going to have Tony bang Emma, make it a one-nighter and move it on. No kids. None of this "a step further" malarkey. Tony's banged more than half the women in the MU by now but it wasn't a serious thing.
Also, it doesn't feel like an "earned" longterm ship, even from what we've seen in this very book.
Luke Cage both married and knocked up the, at the time, self hating ho Jessica Jones. Now they're not happy, well employed and major characters in Marvel. Question is, is Tony a good enough partner to bring the best out of Emma and vice versa as Luke and Jessica proved to be?
No, that's not the question. The question is, does marvel editorial like the pairining enough to let him do that? Or do they only like blacked?
I think my question would be how did Jessica get pregnant from anal sex?
>Now they're not happy
Another strike on Bendis
art imitates life, anon
This pairing just confuses the shit out of me. Tony is neither subby or autistic enough to be exciting for Emma. It's like Duggan just wanted to make his dollies smooch.
Tony is kinky enough to at least be switch, though I'm sure with the control freak that he is, he's more dom. But if you recall, in morrison's x-men, Emma wanted Cyke to be unleashed and go wild on her. Emma actually wants to be dommed. Or at least that's how she was written when she got together with cyke.
They have very similar personalities, backgrounds and are on the same level of physical beauty. I know morons go
>ew, opposites attract muh wholesome polar ships
but in reality it's similarities that make relationships stronger. Tony's a super-handsome super-genius super-billionaire, and when written properly, he's a genuine Alpha. Emma would be attracted to that on a base level. And Emma used to run her own tech company, she's not dumb. Their personalities and goals overlap on various levels. As a pairing, it makes a lot of sense. And it's not like they have any other options. Tony's most stable relationships were Bethany and Rumiko; one's in limbo and the other's dead. Emma was just Scott's sidepiece to keep his dick drained while he waited for Jean to come back. And then there's Namor, I guess. They could be a truly good power couple tbh, if they allow it to progress further and don't kill it during the Krakoa era. And if the rumors are true and they'll recast Stark Post-SW, it wouldn't hurt to ingrain Tony into the X-Men. It makes sense for him to be involved with them anyhow.
indeed
keep dreaming
duality of man
I just want to know who's going to cheat and ruin the relationship first.
More likely they'll try to make it stick and then quietly memoryhole it away unless they get next lvl autist like Tom King
>king on rich billionaire orphan control freak
>with a mommydomme gf
Oh no. OH NO, I know how this goes. RUN!
>king on rich billionaire orphan control freak
>with a mommydomme gf
>Oh no. OH NO, I know how this goes. RUN!
How does it go?
11 issues of closeups of people talking that ends in an anticlimatic last issue.
She has to dress up as a maternal figure and what him sucks on her boobs while she gives him a handjob on the penis.
Why?
>why?
I feel like it's more accurate putdown of his past couple works.
Okay here's the thing about comic book offices. I usually don't follow the history of who's the author of the comic on needed I just followed What happens in the comic. Probably because I Read Manga for like 10 years before I started reading comic books.
But you can understand the intent of the reference right?
That being Tom King is a boring writer of course.
>"Queen."
>"Iron."
>"Queen."
>"Iron."
>"Queen."
>"Iron."
>"Queen."
>"Iron."
sorry but you made too much sense
>Emma would be attracted to that on a base level
>Their personalities and goals overlap on various levels
>As a pairing, it makes a lot of sense
That's some yada yada yada right there.
>It's like Duggan just wanted to make his dollies smooch
I mean why else be a writer for the big two.
>why else be a writer for the big two.
To make your favorite dolly kiss you
Correct.
>want to judge Wolfman for Terry
>realize I would do the same shit if I ever wrote Supergirl
What?
Because Emma Frost has already got kids that are creepy little monsters who look like her and she has proven to be the worst mother on earth to them, and to any kid for that matter.
I hate ESLs.
Let's all just frick our pain away: the book
>"Hickster, any input?"
>"NOPE. Your mess now."