There are like entire viking stories that teaches children. If you are going yo kill someone, kill their ENTIRE family to so they can't enact vengeance towards you and your family.
>This becomes wrong >wrong
you mean a good thing! we need more killers that kill other killers, but not innocent people, the main problem would be when a killer of killers kills another killer of killers, i mean, on his mind he killed right, but killing that killer prevented the killing of other killers, which may not be a good thing.
Why doesn't Batman just fricking paralyse the Joker, or give him testicular torsion or something? There's a million things you could do that would put him out of action but stop short of killing him
Yeah, it makes sense that Batman wants to be the singular arbiter of who lives and dies, but why hasn't any politician gone through with the death penalty. You'd get 99% approval rating overnight if you executed the Joker. Does all of the DC universe have the same strict no-kill moral code?
because the story somehow has to exist, if you just kill off all the antagonists the story ceases to be. It's moronic, but comics are moronic in general, and frick multiverse bullshit too god I hate it so much. Instead characters can never die so the stupid story never ends and when you want to write a new one just create another "multiverse" and tell a slightly different version of the same story yet again.
Yeah, multiverse stuff works best when the separation is upheld outside of extremely specific circumstances, because at a certain point it just breaks down the stakes. You have to show restraint and frankly not many people are able to
Part of it is that you have these principles of chivalry and whatnot that work perfectly fine on a small scale, but then you keep having these world-ending events where Joker becomes a Godzilla or whatever stupid crap they come up with and kills a million people and also the Joker will never be redeemed because the eternal clown/bat conflict was started by the first caveman in gotham in every multiverse and the no-kill rule starts to become self-parody.
That´s not the reason Batman doesn´t kill though. Whoever wrote that line or attached it to him doesn´t get the character, misunderstands him or has simply fricked up in an attempt to over simplify his motivations.
While Bats actions result in acts of heroism it´s not justice or the desire to do good what drives him. It´s not even vengeance. He is insane, he was driven insane by the murder of his parents. He beats criminals because he has a pathological need to do so. He is a highly functional sociopath and the only reason he doesn´t kill is because, in his mind, as long as he doesn´t cross that line he is not the same as them, he is not a monster (not to normal people at least).
That´s why the Joker`s whole raison d'etre is to push him just hard enough that he´ll cross that line. He knows that the moment Batman can justify just one murder he´ll be able to justify killing every single super villain, regular criminal and even hero that gets in his way.
He would still be a character whose personality is written around the fact that he's a vigilante who can't act the way a real world vigilante would, because the Batman franchise is for children.
You become a super killer and the more people you kill the more your killing power level increases. Think about it, a single Uber killer with the combine power of like 5 killer is way scarier than 5 individual killer
You can kill a person by punching them too hard. There's absolutely no way Batman has never killed a person. I mean honestly it might be worse, because you can give someone severe brain trauma and cause them a litany of mental and physical health issues for the rest of their life.
>the joker breaks out of arkham >the joker kills hundreds/thousands of people >batman captures him >the judicial system places him in arkham >the joker breaks out of arkham >the joker kills hundreds/thousands of people
It's just the train problem. Batman is essentially diverting the train from Joker and killing the hundreds/thousands every time.
idiot, it's a ranking system
if you kill two killers you're a killer mark 2, and the amount of kills remains the same
he's obviously saying to keep the rank/amount of killers the same
don't go killing killers lest you simply replace the killers with the same tier, it's not rocket science, it's killing.
it's serious fricking business.
does the biblical God differentiate between some ancient peasant beating his neighbour's head in with a stone over some shit and a random lad thousands of years later killing endless other lads in the WW1 trenches with automatic weapons before being obliterated himself the next day?
which does he consider more worthy of going to Hell?
Serial is not really a number, the term is used because it's so difficult to know the true number of victims. If it makes you feel better, an alternate naming convention is (n)killer - serial killer works in that case.
>In any other event, Bruce could stop himself from going on a rampage
BRAINDEAD MOTHERFRICKING moron
IT IS EXPLICITLY SHOWED THAT IN ANY OTHER EVENT THAT INVOLVES KILLING BRUCE BECOMES A MASS MURDERER
THE BATMAN WHI LMAOS HAS AN ENTIRE FRICKING ARMY OF ENDLESS EVIL BATS THAT BECAME EVIL BECAUSE BRUCE BECAME A KILLER
THE ENTIRE FRICKING POINT OF DARK NIGHTS METAL IS TO SHOW TO EVERY BRAINDEAD FRICK OUT THERE WHY BATS CAN'T KILL, YET BRAINLETS LIKE YOU OR EVERYONE HERE STILL CANT FRICKING GET IT
>In any other event, Bruce could stop himself from going on a rampage
BRAINDEAD MOTHERFRICKING moron
IT IS EXPLICITLY SHOWED THAT IN ANY OTHER EVENT THAT INVOLVES KILLING BRUCE BECOMES A MASS MURDERER
THE BATMAN WHI LMAOS HAS AN ENTIRE FRICKING ARMY OF ENDLESS EVIL BATS THAT BECAME EVIL BECAUSE BRUCE BECAME A KILLER
THE ENTIRE FRICKING POINT OF DARK NIGHTS METAL IS TO SHOW TO EVERY BRAINDEAD FRICK OUT THERE WHY BATS CAN'T KILL, YET BRAINLETS LIKE YOU OR EVERYONE HERE STILL CANT FRICKING GET IT
THEY HAS TO EXPLAIN HOW EVERY BRUCE THAT KILLS BECOMES EVIL WITH NEW CHARACTERS AND EVERYTHING FOR FRICKING TODDLERS LIKE YOU THAT CANT UNDERSTAND IT
CANT UNDERSTAND THAT IF BATS KILLS HE'LL NOT STOP, THATS WHY ALMOST ALL OF HIS ALTERNATE VERSIONS ARE EVIL PSYCHOS ONCE THEY KILLED FOR THE FIRST TIME
FRICKING MONKEYS
This becomes wrong as soon as one killer has killed two killers.
then the number of serial killers goes up by 1
He could simply kill 2 or more serial killers to nerf it out
Then the number of triple homicide serial killers goes up
And what if he kills himself at the end of all that?
Suicide is also a crime
Okay, Tanaka Yamaguchi
There are like entire viking stories that teaches children. If you are going yo kill someone, kill their ENTIRE family to so they can't enact vengeance towards you and your family.
Based
It really makes sense in a society were blood feuds and honor exists as well as there being no prisons
no, because the original killer gets multiplied by two and becomes a double killer
>This becomes wrong
>wrong
you mean a good thing! we need more killers that kill other killers, but not innocent people, the main problem would be when a killer of killers kills another killer of killers, i mean, on his mind he killed right, but killing that killer prevented the killing of other killers, which may not be a good thing.
What if I kill all the killers in the world and then kill myself?
Why is Cinemaphile so obsessed with this fake quote? Batman has never said this in any form of media
>Batman has never said this in any form of media
there's literally a picture of Batman behind the quote
what if I kill a killer and he gets revived?
>if you rape a rapist then the number of rapists in the world multiplies by 1
multiplying by one is the same which means raping a rapist does not make you a rapist
Why doesn't Batman just fricking paralyse the Joker, or give him testicular torsion or something? There's a million things you could do that would put him out of action but stop short of killing him
batman is a dumbfrick
If you feed a sneed, the number of chucks in the world remain the same
The justice system should handle the punishment, not Batman.
Then Batman would just be another police officer.
Yes
Why is Batman a vigilante acting outside the law then?
If you judge a judger, the number of judges in the world remains the same
The only judicial system that has ever been just was on Iceland or the Vehemic Courts of interwar Germany
How could Justice get to Iceland when it's blind?
Justice isn't blind. That's a israeli psyop.
The DC universe justice system is moronic and the writers make it so that he never gets the death penalty.
Yeah, it makes sense that Batman wants to be the singular arbiter of who lives and dies, but why hasn't any politician gone through with the death penalty. You'd get 99% approval rating overnight if you executed the Joker. Does all of the DC universe have the same strict no-kill moral code?
because the story somehow has to exist, if you just kill off all the antagonists the story ceases to be. It's moronic, but comics are moronic in general, and frick multiverse bullshit too god I hate it so much. Instead characters can never die so the stupid story never ends and when you want to write a new one just create another "multiverse" and tell a slightly different version of the same story yet again.
Yeah, multiverse stuff works best when the separation is upheld outside of extremely specific circumstances, because at a certain point it just breaks down the stakes. You have to show restraint and frankly not many people are able to
Part of it is that you have these principles of chivalry and whatnot that work perfectly fine on a small scale, but then you keep having these world-ending events where Joker becomes a Godzilla or whatever stupid crap they come up with and kills a million people and also the Joker will never be redeemed because the eternal clown/bat conflict was started by the first caveman in gotham in every multiverse and the no-kill rule starts to become self-parody.
Each kill by 1 person is counted as a separate killer. Don’t ask how it works.
Fake
That´s not the reason Batman doesn´t kill though. Whoever wrote that line or attached it to him doesn´t get the character, misunderstands him or has simply fricked up in an attempt to over simplify his motivations.
While Bats actions result in acts of heroism it´s not justice or the desire to do good what drives him. It´s not even vengeance. He is insane, he was driven insane by the murder of his parents. He beats criminals because he has a pathological need to do so. He is a highly functional sociopath and the only reason he doesn´t kill is because, in his mind, as long as he doesn´t cross that line he is not the same as them, he is not a monster (not to normal people at least).
That´s why the Joker`s whole raison d'etre is to push him just hard enough that he´ll cross that line. He knows that the moment Batman can justify just one murder he´ll be able to justify killing every single super villain, regular criminal and even hero that gets in his way.
America justified nuking Japan and haven't nuked any other nation since then
Joker's logic is dumb and stupid
Mutts don't need nukes to slaughter millions around the world
>What if he kills two killers?
The killer amount is a weighted based upon how much killing per killer, so it still stays the same
What if the killed killer killed seven people and the new killer only killed the one killer? The killer weighted average decrease
Yeah cause the killer will keep killing
This is why rape is superior to murder. You can only gain
Rape is for losers, chads seduce
You will never be a woman
>he has to force women to have sex with him
>they don't crave his touch and pursue him
Damn, your life sucks
Still superior to murder, troony
Are you high?
No but I'm taller, stronger and faster than you. Still not gonna touch you, troony
I love how me calling you out for getting no b***hes means I'm a troon
You're right. Maybe I should really go out and rape. Thanks for the tip. I will make sure to tell people it was you who gave me the idea
What zero pussy does to a mf
I can smell your desperation over here if you're really this much of a homosexual. Either that or you're a nerdy Black person
I'm not the one that radiates dry dick energy
If you give a troony a sex change the number of men remains the same.
sigmas get seduced
What if you killed three killers then killed yourself?
If two killers kill each other the number of killers is reduced by two.
But they both killed each other, so it cancels out
If you imprison a kidnapper, the number of imprisonments remains the same.
So what?
that's why he imprisons them in Arkham where they can leave any time they want
Oh, that's clever. He really does plan for everything.
He would still be a character whose personality is written around the fact that he's a vigilante who can't act the way a real world vigilante would, because the Batman franchise is for children.
You become a super killer and the more people you kill the more your killing power level increases. Think about it, a single Uber killer with the combine power of like 5 killer is way scarier than 5 individual killer
You can kill a person by punching them too hard. There's absolutely no way Batman has never killed a person. I mean honestly it might be worse, because you can give someone severe brain trauma and cause them a litany of mental and physical health issues for the rest of their life.
>the joker breaks out of arkham
>the joker kills hundreds/thousands of people
>batman captures him
>the judicial system places him in arkham
>the joker breaks out of arkham
>the joker kills hundreds/thousands of people
It's just the train problem. Batman is essentially diverting the train from Joker and killing the hundreds/thousands every time.
idiot, it's a ranking system
if you kill two killers you're a killer mark 2, and the amount of kills remains the same
he's obviously saying to keep the rank/amount of killers the same
don't go killing killers lest you simply replace the killers with the same tier, it's not rocket science, it's killing.
it's serious fricking business.
What if you kill a mark 2 killer? Do you take his rank or do you become just a regular killer?
MONDOBlack folk
does the biblical God differentiate between some ancient peasant beating his neighbour's head in with a stone over some shit and a random lad thousands of years later killing endless other lads in the WW1 trenches with automatic weapons before being obliterated himself the next day?
which does he consider more worthy of going to Hell?
Does that mean Batman doesn't support the troops?
That is the most pseud thing I’ve ever heard.
What if he kills 13% of the killers?
39% of the original killer population will still remain
This is always true, killing two people would make you a double killer (killer +1) and offset the loss of two killers. Killer + (n-1)
What if you kill a serial killer?
Serial is not really a number, the term is used because it's so difficult to know the true number of victims. If it makes you feel better, an alternate naming convention is (n)killer - serial killer works in that case.
then you inherit his crown
If you kill two double killers then the killer amount decreases by one double killer
This isn't even troll math so I'm not going to waste my time with a moron.
>moron can't disprove the point
you get a double killer, which is twice as bad
he becomes the batman who laughs because he accidentally gulped Joker's jizz
In any other event, Bruce could stop himself from going on a rampage
>In any other event, Bruce could stop himself from going on a rampage
BRAINDEAD MOTHERFRICKING moron
IT IS EXPLICITLY SHOWED THAT IN ANY OTHER EVENT THAT INVOLVES KILLING BRUCE BECOMES A MASS MURDERER
THE BATMAN WHI LMAOS HAS AN ENTIRE FRICKING ARMY OF ENDLESS EVIL BATS THAT BECAME EVIL BECAUSE BRUCE BECAME A KILLER
THE ENTIRE FRICKING POINT OF DARK NIGHTS METAL IS TO SHOW TO EVERY BRAINDEAD FRICK OUT THERE WHY BATS CAN'T KILL, YET BRAINLETS LIKE YOU OR EVERYONE HERE STILL CANT FRICKING GET IT
Golden Age Batman shoot pistols and killed villains
He never went psycho or schizo
Are you dumb? That was the joker gas that turned him into a crazy killer, not the act of killing
ALREADY FUYCKING EXPLAINED HERE CHIMP
THEY HAS TO EXPLAIN HOW EVERY BRUCE THAT KILLS BECOMES EVIL WITH NEW CHARACTERS AND EVERYTHING FOR FRICKING TODDLERS LIKE YOU THAT CANT UNDERSTAND IT
CANT UNDERSTAND THAT IF BATS KILLS HE'LL NOT STOP, THATS WHY ALMOST ALL OF HIS ALTERNATE VERSIONS ARE EVIL PSYCHOS ONCE THEY KILLED FOR THE FIRST TIME
FRICKING MONKEYS