>What if you're wrong?
How do you respond without sounding mad?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>What if you're wrong?
>What if you're wrong?
How do you respond without sounding mad?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
|
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
>what if you're wrong
WHOOOAH, peak argument, up there with NO U and NUH UH
you sound mad mission failed
you sound mad mission failed
you sound mad mission failed
you sound mad mission failed
I'm going to need some context champ
He had no comeback and started stumbling over his words.
>no uh uh w-what if you're the one that's actually w-wrong
why would you even waste 5 seconds arguing with an atheist
What else would he say? "Guess I'll burn in hell then"?
His no u question actually made a better point which is that there are many religions in the world we are atheistic towards he just takes it one further.
>What else would he say? "Guess I'll burn in hell then"?
Yes
>What else would he say? "Guess I'll burn in hell then"?
Yeah that would show conviction and confidence in his own opinions.
Pope says gays can get married and atheists can go to heaven and that's the most followed version of Christianity around the globe.
inb4 my turbo homosexual version of Christianity doesn't believe that
>"Guess I'll burn in hell then"?
Actually a good response. Way better than the childish tantrum he gave.
im no atheist but there is nothing logically wrong with his response
Why is he so obsessed with proving God doesn't exist?
What does he achieve other than a lucrative grift for himself?
>What does he achieve other than a lucrative grift for himself?
You answered your own question. He was a failed author and then found success with the atheist stuff.
There was a great interview with him that aired awhile back where he got all upset with the fact that Muslims have made Britain so violent and he feebly stated he preferred living in a Christian country because of how tolerant they are of him being a prick all the time whereas Muslims will just threaten to murder him
It's a genuine tragedy for society that all these anti-Christian morons are figuring out how wrong they were only AFTER the damage is done and everything has been ruined.
At least they'll die feeling guilt & embarrassment. I guess there's that.
>At least they'll die feeling guilt & embarrassment.
This will never happen or at the very least we'll never see it. At the very worst they'll utter a silent prayer on their deathbeds.
It's cool being an athiest and all but if you're only willing to defend your beliefs against confirmed pacifists that happen to be the same race as you, you're just a pussy.
>but if you're only willing to defend your beliefs against confirmed pacifists that happen to be the same race as you, you're just a pussy
That's the case of all academics. They're brainwashed into believing that white=bad, black=good.
Christcucks would've done the same. Their fangs have been taken out by absolutist monarchs and liberalism so they don't enjoy as much power in the modern age
>muh agnostic atheist
Just say you're an indecisive coward.
Reminder.
What would the reaction have been if, say, a Catholic Priest had said the same thing???
What an odd picture choice. It just makes me imagine Dawkins saying that as a creepy smile grows wider and wider on his face.
richard dawkins once spoke at my university and i ran into to him afterwards. i simply asked him what humans evolved from, and he said monkeys, so then i just looked him straight into the eyes and asked him calmly how it can be that if humans evolved from monkeys, we can still find monkeys in the african jungles. i have never seen a person so speechless before. he stammered some non-answered and laughed nervously as i just walked away. the fact that he's now realizing that christianity is the true word of god makes me think that me and the power of jesus christ made an impact on his life that day.
If he can declaratively know something ISN'T true with certainty, is he some barometer of truth? Surely he accepts science isn't "done" and we're constantly gathering new information?
"Richard, how do we generate cheap, harmless energy?" Run through an exhaustive list if it's a binary true/false type power.
You can't make unsubstantiated claims about things and piss and shit yourself when someone rejects them in lieu of further evidence.
I mean you can flip anything around to be the not. Here he talks about living in ____ time, you'd believe...
If he lived in Victorian times he'd believe in the luminiferous aether, not photons. If he says the aether doesn't exist, or that photons do, what if he's wrong? Physicists could be wrong, now.
Religion even has the built-in gimmick of requiring faith. I don't believe in any religion, but I don't know that any are incorrect. If I did and thought it was important to let other people know, I'd do everything. Has this guy signed up to have his brain preserved so future scientists can read it?
Old brains are useless to study.
It baffles me that a subset of judaism with no proof for any supernatural claims is even worth debating over. Especially considering the modern understanding of cults, cultists and how they grow and operate.
Some people out there seem to think everything that tastes like Chicken is just pretending to be Chicken.
I want to be in a cult. I would if I could (and they didn't murder me or something).
>what if you're wrong, atheist?
>n-nooooooo but atheism can't be wrong
frick off
Only the great big Juju in the sky is real. I can not be wrong.
>Hey man did you know that if you don't give me a hand job to completion you'll instantly fly into the sun?
>"No I won't"
>WELL WHAT IF YOU'RE WRONG YOU DON'T WANNA FLY INTO THE SUN NOW DO YOU?
What's your point? This trick actually works.