What is quintessential pseud-core?
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
What is quintessential pseud-core?
What is quintessential pseud-core?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
|
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Any Godard joint
Any Jodorowsky joint
Any Wenders joint
Any Linklater joint
Post your top 5
Claire's Breast (Massivo Titti, 1973)
My Mother is a prostitute (Jean-Pierre Mondieu, 1984)
Ivan's Pidorhood (Andrei Dumbassky, 1962)
14/88 (Benissimo Fellato, 1958)
Get Out (Jordan Peele, 2017)
This is unironically gayer than having MCU as top 5
t. embryo moment
>no Big Shit
Fricking morons with their worthless opinions.
what a about spike lee and spike jonze joints?
They're fine
This but also David Lynch
On the contrary, David Lynch is a pseud filter (that makes you pseud, congratulations)
>I'm intelligent for consuming this product
Thanks for being so quick to prove my point
Nah, famalam. Lynch filters redditors. And he hates autists and nerds.
Weird since most of his fans are autists and nerds
Autists almost never have any interest or understanding of art and can't watch anything that is open ended. Everything must make sense and they have a huge need for closure. That's why so many autists get stuck watching stuff that's intended for kirds long into their childhood. Lynch is pretty much as far away as posible from the stuff autists enjoy.
>childhood
*adulthood, I meant
Takes one to know one I guess
Wtf I actually agree. Good list
Thanks
>Any Godard joint
Even a woman is a woman?
1960-1964 Godard is fine
I think most people can agree on Godard.
David O. Russell
Darren Aronofsky
Claire Denis
Nine Menkes
The Man From Earth
words to sound smart
Any and every film starring reddits favorite meme actress sarah gadon
We know she mined coal at the coal mine
Nolan
I would classify him as more midwit core. Small difference but there's more honesty in why his fans like his movies and fewer pretensions of it being more than that
Yeah, at least with the Nolan filmbro crowd you can tell they became fan because they legitimately enjoyed his flicks in cinema.
Any filmmaker that people actively seek out to watch in order to appear smart is pseudcore. From my experience Tarkovsky fans were the biggest pseuds.
any film considered a "classic"
It's Kubric. The answer is Kubrick. There is no against this, there's no argument for why something else would be a better fit, and anyone who says anything either didn't think of Kubrick or they're pseuds.
Ask Kubrick to pay rent already
I'm sorry that you feel hurt by the truth pseud.
Says the homosexual who autistically cry over a dead man
typical response. go back to europe please
red scare pod
I only listen to them ironically
Absolutely everything from directors ending with -ski.
what about -sky?
any reddit movie
Woody Allen
Villeneuve.
fight club
blade runner
nightcrawler
drive
taxi driver
>fight club
Anyone who thinks fight club has a solution instead of just critique is pseud yes, but I was kind of shocked by how well the themes of that movie aged.
Anything PTA
V for vendetta
>Fight Club and A24 horror movies
>Tom King comics
>Planetscape Torment, Celeste and Final Fantasy IX vidya
>FF9
homie wat
Anything made by Denis Villeneuve.
>This movie isn't as smart as it thinks it is
Because it's a fricking movie, you dipshit.The real pseuds are anyone who turns to a movie or a TV show for any reason besides entertainment.
Quintessential pseudism is simply hating anything popular or fun unsolicited. There's nothing wrong with loving anything that makes you happy, pseuds try to prop up their artificial status by belittling and demeaning anything they feel they can use as ammunition to make themselves look morally/intellectually superior.
That goes for you too. I'm putting you in check pseud!
I think the identifier of the pseud is someone who seems to just like every classic "artistic" or "challenging" movie/director they see. And if they can't properly explain in their own words why they like it that also gives it away. I don't hold it against anyone for liking any movie until I hear their opinion of it. Pseuds will give the most textbook, movie-critic-like opinion that doesn't sound like they got it on their own. Dostoevsky knew this.
>I think the identifier of the pseud is someone who seems to just like every classic "artistic" or "challenging" movie/director they see.
I think you're the pseud. You're the one trying to make movie appreciation into a demonstration of intellectualism, which by its very nature is pseudo-intellectual. There's nothing wrong with enjoying classic films, and there's nothing wrong with a neophyte not yet having developed discriminating enough tastes to separate what he genuinely likes and what he simply appreciates as an encoding of aesthetic, nostalgic styles.
Yeah, stop being a pseud anon. You are not impressing anybody.
Objectively correct, Idk why the replies to you are seething.
All of YOUR favorite movies. Meanwhile all of MY favorite movies are kino of the highest order
Anything directed Nolan.
Interstellar is probably the king of this.
you know what
I MISS MILLENNIAL HIPSTERS
it all only went down from there
Interstellar
could just say Nolan and Aronofsky there
Frasier, every episode.
your biopic
every single film here
What's pseud about Bone Tomahawk? Seems like a pretty standard western flick without any challenging narratives or themes
anon it's a joke
those are all good movies
he wants you to be angry because he collated a list of widely appreciated films and brusquely called them "pseudointellectual"
that's how the bait-and-response repartee works
To my young zoomer friends, the joke here, of course, is that every one of these films is positively brilliant.
Except the asian ones, I don't watch asian movies.
Primer is peak pseud though.
Not really. If you didn't understand it that's ok.
Synecdoche NY is the exact opposite of brilliant, it is one of the most evil pieces of art ever made
I'm sorry the film made you feel uncomfortable. That doesn't make it "pseudo-intellectual", however. The only thing pseudo-intellectual is posturing like not appreciating a film makes you intelligent.
It's emasculating as frick. The direction and the idea of time passing and you losing opportunities were very good, but it's full of anti-male pozzed propaganda.
>The Brown Bunny
>positively brilliant
That, and "Extension du domaine" whatever are actually the only things on that list I haven't seen. What's bad about it? Everything else on there is kino.
brown bunny is just a guy driving with a shitty a soundtrack and crying for 90 minutes. theres a blowjob scene but I couldnt get that far
2001: A Space Odyssey
Band of Brothers
Anything Tarantino
The opposite. Pseudo-intellectuals hate Tarantino because liking his movies doesn't make them look smart
beyond one's own comprehension
>PSEUD!
True Detective, anything by Lynch, pretending to genuinely enjoy Hitchwiener in the current year, pretending that Mad Men is anything more than a soap opera for men that wish they were real men to vicariously live through the Sword Art Online tier protagonist of the show, Easy Rider, the Deer Hunter. There is a lot more, but I can only think about those right now.
To watch Mad Men for more than 10 minutes straight you need to either be sub-95 IQ, a woman, or israeli.
There is NO way a three-digiter white man can watch that slop
Dr. Strangelove
Caring only about plot
Caring only about metaphor
Thinking effects can't be good just because they're digital
Thinking sound is unimportant
Von Trier
Aronofsky
Lanthimos. Especially Dogshit.
Zulawski
Sono
Bong Ho
Tarantino
Anti-pseud: Tinto Brass
Is that StoneToss?