What is the Cinemaphile equivalent to audiophiles?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
What is the?
What is the Cinemaphile equivalent to audiophiles?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Pedophiles
bump
projectorgays
Hebephiles
MPV users.
w-why are the cables so thick? what's the purpose?
Reduce electrical infetterance.
Actual answer is insulation from electromagnetic interference, which does actually happen, but is so indiscernible to most human ears that it's basically placebo
It is an issue on signal wires, but on the wires actually driving the speakers? Pretty much doesn't matter. Maybe if you really really care, you would have one layer of ground shielding on them, but it would be pretty thin and almost unnoticeable unless you were looking for it.
The problem with those cables is that the shielding doesn't connect at the ends, and therefore allows interference in. So those cables actually suck.
Right, so placebo. I mean don't get me wrong, I'm a quality autist to some extent too, but there is a point of taking it too far for no actual benefit that's "worth it".
100%.
Actual shielded cables look this this. Maybe a bit thicker for higher power speakers, and maybe each wire has it's own shield, but they are pretty much just this. The shield has to be electrically connected at least one end to actually work. (sometimes you don't wan't both ends to avoid ground loop shit).
>Tfw we agree and are on the same page
A beautiful little moment on Cinemaphile.
And I will add that basically the only time you need this for speaker connections is for really long runs of wire, or for wire that happens to run right next to power wire or other high EMI source.
For signal connections, shielded is generally a good idea, but not required all the time.
Most "audio signal cables", like the 3.5mm ones or the RCA style connectors are shielded anyway.
It's indiscernible to all human ears.
Men get older and pour increasingly high amounts of money into snake oil to try to get back the hearing they had when they were younger.
video files
Remuxgays
i'm pretty sure those are robotic porn tentacles not sound cables
_-_bowtie_closed_mouth_female_femjak_food_foot_glasses_lollipop_redraw_smile_sock_soyjak_underpants_variant_soylita_yellow_hair.png
Where's the booru, then?
Gem
this image title implies you have 16000 or more "basedjak" images all carefully categorized with 8+ tags per image
"art"house shit like The Holy Mountain
though actually: since it's a technological issue, almost the same: expensive audio like that nad monitors/projectors that want +90% the money for +1% the benefit (if at all).
that cord gives me the heebie jeebies
Probably people who download 30gb+ torrents of a single movie instead of just watching a shitty 1080 yiffy rip then deleting it like the rest of us
>filthy yify pixels hitting your eyeballs
enjoy your eye cancer
less pixels = bigger kino
The real red pill is compromising right in the middle for 8-15 GB films (depending on length and medium). The sweet spot is 3-4 GB per hour of video at 1080p.
>then deleting it like the rest of us
i've never deleted a file in my life
Home theater guys.
>What is the Cinemaphile equivalent to audiophiles?
MVP, so at least is cheaper
why do these threads always stay up for hours?
sound isn't tv & film related?
This is a good thread
Would you prefer more shillbot and outragebait threads?
How is this a good thread? It's slow as frick and no one has posted anything interesting.
?t=392
MAPINGO WOOD SHUN MOOK STAINLESS STEEL DIAMOND GROUNDING SPIKES
arguing over physical formats