What is the most disappointing remake of all time?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
What is the most disappointing remake of all time?
What is the most disappointing remake of all time?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Fake
Frick astronomers for wasting our money on this bullshit, if it doesn't involve humans I'm not interested
Are there any real photos of galaxies?
you're literally looking at one
t. gullible brainlet
>ask question
>don't get an idiot schizo response
>hurr durr ur gullible
you're the gullible one if you believe the assinine shit on youtube telling you that space is fake. You're also a shithead for pretending to be asking questions in good faith when there's really nothing that would actually convince you to abandon your idiocy, and you know
Space is real but the pictures are fake. If we could go to space, all those galaxies and nebulas we know from NASA pictures would look nothing like they do in the pictures because they're heavily edited.
I have a feeling you heard how photos of space are rendered in a program so you think that means theyre fake
>all those galaxies and nebulas we know would look nothing like they do in the pictures
No, they would look a lot like the pictures to your naked eye if you were floating in space the right distance away. There are lots of them where the colors are distorted but there are also ones that are pretty close to what your eye would see.
Wait you seriously don't know photos of space are manipulated? If we went out there we would not see that shit because our eyes can't see on most spectrums
No they're all edited to show what they would look like if we could see "ultra-violent light" or whatever. I don't think they've ever actually released a real photo.
Probably true for images of distant galaxies but Andromeda is visible to the naked eye
the earth is on a crater on the moon. there is a firnament we can't escape from. archons work for yahweh through their proxy, the israelites , to enslave souls in this petri dish and force them to worship yahweh, lucifer, the god of the material, rather than return to christ in heaven.
Are you an unironic gnostic heretic or are you just in it for the memes?
There are no gnostics on Cinemaphile
Holy shit go back to /x/ homosexual
christcucks are so fricking boring. I could enjoy this shit if you involved some alien xenomorph overlords. fricking animorphs is more entertaining than christcuck homosexualry
>Everything in our society is a control mechanism by the israelites.... except for the holy word of our lord Yeshu'a Hamashiach, the promised king of the israelites who would restore glory to Israel!!
This is what christcucks actually believe.
mom?
real ones are in black and white, it's basically all radiations.
lmao so they just edited all the other shit in? this is embarassing
What they do is putting them colors, im not even sure if they are the accurate, but everything they originally capture is all monochrome.
My heckin colorinos
its giving off heat or fricking with the area around it, black hole
It's pretty crazy how people don't know this.
me on the left
yes, real photos are white and black spots with different intensities and other shit that can be distinguished from one another based on the telescope resolution
the colors and shapes are reconstructed using softwares
anon, we're literally in space right now
Shut the FRICK up
Based and empathypilled.
Scientists are cold hearted and are the only people who would spend billions of dollars on upgrading some pictures of lights while people starve
Pale Blue Dot is pure soul:
Truly profound.
where the frick do pictures like this come from. who makes them and why.
Isn't it some open mouth competition thing?
Hope you never need antibiotics bro
alcohol and natural herbs fixes most diseases
>t. Hates white people
t.
if you can't see why the James Webb picture is an improvement, I don't know what to tell you.
There's also the fact that the photo on the right took months to produce, where the one on the left took DAYS. So imagine what kind of quality/depth James Webb could do with months of exposure
You're arguing with a moron/schizo on Cinemaphile. Think about that for a second.
You're right, I don't know why I'm wasting my time
Thanks for the reality check anon
they're artificial colored but those are real photos exposed from real infrared light in the case of the left
>artificial colored
>real photos
pick one
So unless they take the picture with a giant Nikon camera, you won't believe it?
Why do they refuse to show us the real colors?
we can't see the colors anon, that's why they use computers to process it to colors we can see. Please at least watch anything about how they take these images.
The colours are mapped to data, you know, like exactly how your perception of sight works? Some of those galaxies are only visible in infrared, for example, so they take data which is beyond the visible spectrum for humans and map it to an image we can see. That doesn’t mean that they tamper with the data at all. moron!
So what you're saying is... that's not what space really looks like and the image is faked.
Gotcha!
So you admit that none of those galaxies look like they do in the pictures NASA shows us
i assure you that if you play around with the contrast, saturation and brightness knobs on photoshop for long enough then eventually galaxy like images will pop up. scientist just see what they want to see.
>So imagine what kind of quality/depth James Webb could do with months of exposure
look even further away as it gathered more light??
yes anon, correct, you get a sticker
They didn't even manage to zoom in any further
that's because they're meant to be a comparison to gauge its abilities, you moron
You wanna see stars and galaxies just look up at the night sky, fricking pathetic nerd.
Until they get a close up of the Andromeda galaxy with the planets and moons, this shit is nothing.
I will let NASA know to reach out to you for advice.
what does it feel like to have your galaxy collide with another galaxy?
Space is 99.whatever percent empty, nothing would happen
Stick around for a couple billion years and you'll find out
You never truly die, just return to the universe Anon.
They add the color to bedazzle soichugs into donating to NASA.
Interlinked.
What's it like to hold the hand of someone you love
Euphoric
like bags of sand
Milky coins and bags of sand
Are you telling me people are really okay with paying for this shit? Holy frick we got the rocket tech let it die already, space is for gay Black folk.
>Are you telling me people are really okay with paying for this shit?
I hope they are. A slight technological improvement is much more preferable to paying for some single mother and her niglet with your taxes.
tired bait
Yeah Im okay with it. From a financial stand point it costs us average taxpayers pennies.
Think of the poor Black folk that could get an extra food stamp instead!
I gotta be honest with you guys. Everything about space puts me to sleep. I will long dead before they start colonizing planets. Humanity is more likely to be dead too with how fricked the world is at the current moment.
>We can Terraform Mars Bro!
>Why can't we Terraform the Sahara, Gobi, or other dead places on Earth first as proof of concept?
>Why do you hecking hate science bro?
Because altering a desert in one place will create one in another. Suddenly all that expensive, rich, fertile soil we use to grow all our prized subsidized corn crops will turn to dust and blow away.
*dessert
It's called California.
There has never been a better time to be alive. Stop with the childish thinking.
Sure, but we're still fricked though.
aren't galaxies supposed to be really far apart? they dont look very spread out to me
They aren't far apart when you realize there's billions of them in the universe. They aren't far apart, we can just see more of them now.
galaxies are also very big. Plus the image is a zoomed in photo of distant objects so the more distant objects will look bigger relative to the closer ones than if the closer ones were right next to you
>100,000 light years
>140,000 light years
milkycels... how can we ever hope to compete?
MILKOIDS ITS OVER
still looks too close for comfort tbqh.
>what is depth
>what is scale
>what is perspective
what does that have to do with my question?
Youre assuming that two galaxies which are “close together” are even actually side by side in the first place. For example, are all of the stars in the night sky side by side? What if two appear to be about the same size and brightness? One could be a lot smaller but closer to you.
By your logic, everything you see is fake, because everything you see is data interpreted by your brain.
Not at all. All the colors I see are visible colors. You are admiting that NASA puts colors into their pictures to represent non-visible stuff. Hence galaxies don't actually look the way NASA claims they do. Why do you refuse to admit that?
you are legitimately moronic if you can't understand how this works
You literally admitted in one of your posts that some of the galaxies in those photos aren't even visible in reality. Are you taking that back now?
Just because our eyes cant see shit dosent mean it isnt there. Different species of animals see the world very different .
Take your phone and look at the light coming from a remote control. The phone camera can see a little into the infrared but you can't see it with your eyes
So if I take a photo of you, but I change your skin color to brown in photoshop, would you claim that its still a real photo because its still an "interpretation of data"??
Our eyes can't see infrared but it has its own spectrum of wavelengths those are just shifted. Near IR is converted to blues, Far IR is converted to reds.
So you admit that galaxies don't actually look like NASA depicts them in their images. If I took a spaceship there, I wouldn't see what NASA portrays.
>So you admit that galaxies don't actually look like NASA depicts them in their images. If I took a spaceship there, I wouldn't see what NASA portrays.
you know, i didn't really care too much that space images were edited to make things more visible. But it only just occurred to me how pale, depressing and dark the universe really is. Like if you go out in a space ship and look out the window it would just be black with occasional specs of white. How miserable. There really is nothing out there.
That's why stars are so essential. It's all there is to light it up
A proper analogy would be:
If you were wearing a fullbody greensuit in front of a greenscreen and I colored you in so we could view your silhouette so you don't blend in with all the green, would you claim that it's still a real photo because its still an "interpretation of data"??
And, I'm not that anon, but I would say yes.
Now, if you're trying to show off how good of a green body suit it is, then you should show both the before and the after. But nobody wants to see space without color because unless you're an astrophysicist with the data in front of you, you'll have no idea what you're viewing.
So you admit that space is just full of boring gasses without color and NASA edits them in photoshop to trick people into thinking the universe is beautiful
Nobody said NASA was trying to make the universe beautiful, they are saying they made it so you can see it. If you wear night vision goggles in pitch dark, is everything you can see as a result “fake”?
Why can't you just answer my very very simple question - if I was to take a rocket to the galaxies and nebulas which NASA takes pictures of, would they look like they do in the pictures? yes or no?
You wouldn't make it there
Dodging the question again because you know you're wrong
I'm not he
Are you claiming that you have the ability to travel 13.5 billion light years?
pathetic.
Lets say you could travel that distance, it would look nothing like that photo because youre looking 10+ billions of years into the past. Thats as close of an answer to your misguided question that I will answer for you
rofl you keep finding new pathetic ways to dodge the question. if I could travel that distance as well as 10+ billion years into the past, would it look like it does in the photos?
Look at the milky way you moron
Since when could you time travel? Will you share this technology
Im not him but time dilation is real.
time dilate.
Look, the man who was asking baby philosophy questions like "how do you know anyone is seeing the same colors man?" now pretends he doesn't know what a thought experiment is
That's a different person anon
Why are you upset
You don't have to do a thought experiment because you can go outside right now and look at what our galaxy looks like. And yes id does look like the pictures
It woulook different because its still 3b years in the past from when you travelled to
If I give you a straight answer you’ll be satisfied and always remain dumb, thats the problem. Rather than give you an answer I want you to ask the right question.
Do you honestly think that bothers me?
Anon, its very, very far away. It isn't happening.
I'm sorry
No ut would look different because you're looking at the past in the picture
Take your bait to the cube
when things are too far away they still emit light that humans can't perceive, but the telescope can measure. NASA replaces that light with colors (reds, blues) that we can perceive. if it emits light, it's there.
Your eye interprets sensory data in exactly the same way NASA interprets data from the James Webb telescope. First of all how can you even be sure that colors are the same for you that they are for me? No image that you see is “real” its interpreted data, which is why you can hallucinate, or why some people can “see” sounds. If they changed values in the data, like moving pixel a from xy to wv, then it would be considered “fake.” All they are doing is mapping the data to colors that are visible for your brain to interpret. Its no different than putting thermal goggles, or something similar
lmao. I ask whether NASA images display galaxies as they truly look like and you have to go all philosophy 101 and question the veracity of all perception because you can't admit that they don't. I take this as an admission of defeat.
Are you black? You seem to be moronic. They didn’t alter any of the data they just made it so that your ungrateful eyes can see it. By your definition, nothing you see is real because its interpreted data. Dumbass lol
It's bait anon, hence his need to finish with a win
>muh interpretation of data!!
why do you keep bringing this r*ddit phrase up? I am saying galaxies don't look the way NASA pictures depict them as looking. Are you denying that?
What im saying is that mapping data vs altering data are two different things, which you seem to be struggling to grasp
You can image andromeda with a camera. A NASA instrument can see beyond the visible spectrum
>A NASA instrument can see beyond the visible spectrum
>beyond the visible spectrum
So the pictures don't show us what the galaxies would actually look like. Yes or no?
Yes they do. You can do it with a phone
>So the pictures don't show us what the galaxies would actually look like. Yes or no?
No. And no one is claiming that it shows how it looks like. The light we receive is not on the spectrum we normally see.
Finally you admit it
That's not me though>>1
There is nothing to admit. NASA releases shitloads of pictures. They state if they are true colors or not. Only extremely few are in true color.
three different NASA shills, three entirely different questions. that is all I need to know. you people don't know what the frick you're talking about.
>questions
>heh, he mixed up words, therefore NASA pictures are real
NASA pictures are real. They are just colored in a way to simulate how it would look because the light we get is in a spectrum humans cant see.
>real
>simulated
pick one
If you want me to pick between these two options, which is impossible, then real is the more correct of the two.
>does a galaxy really have these colors?
>sciencecel: no they are simulated and invisible but also they are not simulated but visible but you couldn't find out anyway because you couldn't travel that far and the galaxy no longer exists anyway
It does though. This is Andromeda in visible light
When will you admit your question is moronic? At least admit that youre black.
What even is real? Take some lsd or dmt and see how the reality you normally experience is just an interpretation of your brain.
NOOOOOOOO THATS TOO PHILOSOPHICAL
You dont even need drugs to induce such a reality bending state in yourself. Just think of people with Synesthesia. Their perception of reality is very different.
>Synesthesia
not real. tumblr meme.
This is what sciencecels actually believe
Holy frick that cus it is both. Things outside visible spectrums are given colours in order to map elements.
that video literally says that galaxies are actually just black and white and then colorized by scientists in colors they don't really have. you people are not just stubborn but mentally ill at this point.
Just admit youre black, at least it will make sense why youre being stubborn
How would you even know I am black? perhaps I am purple or olive green and your brain just interprets the data differently
If i were to compare sensory data of an image of you and myself, i would see that your skin has more melanin in it than mine, no matter what color map the photos use. Id also be able to see that your lips are much bigger than mine.
Why do you keep ignoring my posts about images of Andromeda and the Milky way in visible light?
Because I am talking about NASA pictures of galaxies real people can't look at themselves
You can. Its just that no one really publicizes the non colored pictures because our vision system cant see the details very clearly. Do you think they are hidden in some secret lair under NASA HQ?
So you admit that there are pictures which show the real colors and that they are not the same ones which are publicized, and that the latter do not show the real colors.
There are no colors. A color is just data interpreted by your brain
There we go. The redditor now has to deny the existence of colors rather than admit that NASA fakes the colors of galaxies on their images. Imagine being this much of a desperate shill.
Colors are made up by your brain so you can tell what snakes are poisonous. In other words a color is just how your brain interprets data. Calling me a redditor wont change that, im sorry
I am now convinced that you are 15 years old. Nobody else would be this impressed by reddit phrases like "interprets data" to constantly repeat them.
Go outside at midnight and noon to look at the same tree, does it look the same? The colours will appear different based on how much light is reflected off of it. Does that mean the tree isn’t real, or what what you see isn’t real?
Everything you have been saying has also been made up by your brain. Therefore, its also all false.
Just because its interpreted it doesn’t mean its not real thats the point.
True, I thought the reasons they chose IR were primarily:
1. Visible spectrum is blocked by interstellar dust, IR penetrates it
2. Redshift of the furthest galaxies is so large it enters the IR spectrum
3. Warm gasses emit in the IR range, allowing a better understanding of the non-luminous materials
Given that stars emit in ranges we can see, there’s not reason we can’t image them in the visible wavelengths, it’s just that your wouldn’t see much as you look deeper into space (which was the purpose of the telescope in the first place).
I can understand the disappointment in the limitations of our bodies to perceive the world, but it doesn’t really matter as we can see our own galaxy and Andromeda in “real color” and they all pretty much look alike.
Do you not see the fricking photo I posted showing how the first colour photography was 3 separate black and white exposers done with filters. Christ.
>outside visible spectrums
How can you keep using terms this like this while still refusing to admit that galaxies don't actually look this way? do you know what "visible" means?
Its visible for the sensors. And for several different animals.
Are you a "sensor" or a "different animal"? Do the invisible parts of the spectrum look like blue or red or whatever the NASA scientists assign to those parts for the sensor or the animals?
So you admit that the sensory data is the same, only that its interpreted differently from different species and instruments
You people do realize you're looking at a computer monitor that's interpreting data to control RGB pixels to "FAKE" colors right?
>interpreting data
there's that r*ddit talk again.
>He said while typing on a screen that's interpreting data and turning them into colours
stop talking about this "interpreting data" shit, this isn't philosophy class. I keep asking you a simple question and you keep giving me this convoluted pseud shit because if you talked like a human being for a second you'd have to admit that you got btfo
>ADMIT IM RIGHT BECAUSE IM TOO SMOOTH BRAINED TO UNDERSTAND!
not even him but this is embarrassing.
Cute
Don't google her now. The wall was not kind.
kys redditor
Look at the milky way at night and that what you'll see
Its not my fault you’re having such a hard time, man. You want a simple answer but you’re not really asking the right question.
From what I understand Yes that's what they would look like if you could see them. The pictures are colorized based on the data received, it's not just some random NASA intern guessing what things should look like.
what's your cope about microscopes?
they're fake
Everyone who replied thus far is a humorless twat
You included
Found the humorless twat. Kys autist
>after years and billions NASA's CGI got worse
>this is what one gorillion in government grants (aka your money) accomplishes
>NOOOOOOOO, GIB MY MONEY TO NIGS, I HECKING LOVE BBC
>WE NEED TO WASTE PEOPLE'S TAXPAYER DOLLARS SO WE CAN HAVE LE HECKIN WHOLESOME PHOTOSHOPPED PICTURES OF LE HECKIN SPACERINO BECAUSE I HECKIN LOVE SCIENCE!!!!!!!
You are not even white or american, Black person, stay in your thirdworld shithole and dont shittalk white people and their accomplishments.
An accomplishment on par with a filtered Instagram picture of Kim Kardashian. Get real, Black person, and start wondering how your money is being spent instead of sperging about race. See who benefits from that.
Yes? Government wasting millions on useless shit (photoshopped pictures) and government officials and contractors lining their pockets (military industrial complex) with trillions in unaccounted dollars. What makes you think I won't be critical of both?
Not a single mention of Israel, just what I thought.
>hehehe... gotcha, israelite
Did you miss the military industrial complex part, moron?
I truly hope you keep the same fervor when it comes to churches dodging taxes, the ever increasing foreign aid to Israel and the expanding defense budget.
Israel is an oasis of freedom in a desert of terrorism. Why do you love terrorism so much?
When the national debt of your country is breaching 30 trillion I don't think a few billion put towards the understanding of our place in the universe is an issue large enough to warrant focus on above others.
>a highly edited SCIENCE photograph will expand our understanding of the universe
lol.
investing in universe discovery is never a waste of money
We should solve word hunger first
Even if they did, everyone here turns any positive global initiative into "you will eat zee bugs"
It can already be solved with our technology. The issue it no one wants to openly share.
How about we save Ukraine first huh? Someththat matters!
No, we don't because we will never leave our rock.
Except maybe the israelites who will fly back to Jupiter or Saturn to be back among the lizard people.
We've got 3.5m years to get off the plaent5. There is time
Your soul is weighed down by gravity.
> Lizard people
> Jupiter and Saturn are gas giants, anon.
They have cores you should be able to swin/stand on with the right equipment
amen sistah, i need another gucci belt and get my hair did so i can meet my 6th baby daddy
All blacks should be executed. Nobody should get paid just for being alive. Scientific and bureaucratic boondoggles should not be funded.
"Hey, Copernicus, stop fannying about with astronomy and get a proper job! Frisch...why are you staring at those bees? Curie? Get back in the fricking kitchen!!"
>disappointing
https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasawebbtelescope/52210580092
What am I supposed to think about this? They look pretty much the same. Who’s James Webb?
Think what you want man, I suggest you view the original pictures before passing judgment though
https://webbtelescope.org/contents/media/images/2022/034/01G7DA5ADA2WDSK1JJPQ0PTG4A
The original is so big it almost can fit your mom
Space is fricking dumb as shit. Pure reddit.
So if webb did this in 12 hours vs hubbles 2 weeks, are we looking at hubbles output in about a year plus change?
youre all FRICKING moronic, have a nice day
if you want us dead kill us yourself you cowards
You'll never make it to mars
>All those lens flares
Who directed this?
It's caused by the hexagonal design of the dish
six pointed star? epic, just epic.
should have made it fricking round then
They couldn't because of size constraints from the rocket system used to launch it. You can't make a single round lens that could fold up like the hexagon setup they used. It's made up of individual hexagons that can move around on their own to allow it to focus properly.
How have these galaxies moved so much closer in just a few decades?
Shouldn't it take millions of years for them to move so far?
The only thing reddit about space is that you Black person homosexuals exist in it.
>you can tell it's real because it looks so fake
which one of them went for real??
>tfw the flat earthers were right all along
Say hello to Pluto.
Pluto has the power of Heart.
More like cute-o
>it’s a planet
>it’s not a planet
>it’s a planet
>it’s not a planet
I say we throw every nuke we’ve got at Pluto, and reduce it to cosmic dust. That’ll end that stupid argument once and for all.
If its a planet, so are the other five
don't be mean.
Anon we visited in 2015. Here have a real picture.
>muh homeless
>muh brainwash activism
are people seriously siding with these liberals? this is an impressive feat for mankind
No, it's about spending on your citizens instead of pipedreams for only the elite.
Crazy homeless used to be locked up and vagrants got chased out of town by cop and citizen. Now the crazy homeless are given voting ballots because it's le wrong to call them crazy smelling bum fricks.
It was $10 billion over 20 years, what crisis do you think could have been remedied with those pennies in our nation's budget?
>lol, billions of dollars is chump change, so why not spend it on space pictures?
10 billion could open 100 asylums to keep psychos off the street. It could be used on our failing infrastructure, open molten thorium power plants instead of jack off green solutions.
We have the money to do all of those things you know. Take a look at the US military budget then take a look at everything else it spends money on. We can absolutely do it all and even if you think we somehow can't, there's a whole tax system that multinational companies exploit to pay the least taxes impossible, we can always revamp that to get new revenue streams.
It's not a money issue and never was. It's a political one. We have the money and we have the legal mechanisms to fix these things, we just don't have the political will.
so it sounds like you want universal healthcare, good roads, and reduce our dependency on oil.
lol
lmao even
>could
dropped.
That's pennies compared to what the military gets up to.
I know homies. The average person would shit seeing the waste in the military but 10 billion is still a lot of dosh for pictures of shit that will not matter forever. Space travel is a giant grift and distracts from the corruption that does effect everyone
The 10 billion didn't evaporate, it employed tons of highly educated people, and kept them in the country.
>Space travel is a giant grift
True, but not the way you mean it.
But it's not a grift, this producing fricking results. Just because you don't like it doesn't make it a grift. The telescope is doing what it's built to do, goddamn man do you read the shit you type out??
Enjoy your 10 billion dollar photo that is a pissant improvement over Hubble goy.
So because you can't see the WIFI signals coming out of your router does it mean it does't exist?
Get rid of your phone anon. If you have to ask why you're useless.
That money is the lifetime budget over 20 years of research to get this thing built. Fundamental science is extremely important for pretty much everything.
homie we spend a hell of a lot more than 10 billion dollar a year on Black folk and homosexuals and all we get out of that are innocent people victimized and child rape.
so? Tax is theft by coercion, no reason to talk about coulds, you are not entitled to other peoples money
putting money on technological and scientific advancement and universe exploration is still better than any moralist money giving, so frick off
I changed my mind, space is not reddit - being against space is reddit and funding NASA is redpilled
saved the worst for last. george floyd covid/fentanyl-riddled heart giving out really took the fun out of life.
is the last one a satire account? i genuinely can't tell.
yeah, i think it is... right?
https://twitter.com/a_liberationist
okay this account is def satire and it is.... wonderful (apologies for spamming it)
They unironically have a point.
maybe if you're a mindless liberal
space is overrated. people who want to trash the planet and move to moon domes are mouth breathers. I hope one of those rocket ship blows up.
White people do great things and great things grow from the effort, we wouldn't have velcro if not for his desire to frick the universe
No they don't
>what if you just gave everyone in america a million dollars instead, then everyone could afford a house!
They have a point insofar as billions could be going to something more useful. The homeless issue certainly isn't one of them.
If we could take 10 billion more from Black folk and homeless people and rocket it into space I would be all for it
>b***h about spending chump change on space tech
>ignore the military spending more money than the top 9 other military powers combined
They are brainlets. Muh 20 billion. The US federal budget of 2021 was 6818 billion.
Well, you could easily take a fraction of what is spent on corporate welfare.
Understanding the universe around us is kind of important.
We didn't shoot the money into space
>filename
>sensible_chuckle.gif
WHITEY ON THE MOON
What's the point of editing it putting colors and making all of us believing it's a festival of colored stars? Are the colors even accurate or is it just some artistic vision?
because it makes people heckin love science
are "galaxies" even real, they're supposed to be massive but you never even see one yourself. So I question it a lot of the time about these "evidences". Stars yeah, cause you can sometimes see them at night, at least the moon is real cause you actually see it.
The moon is an Alpha channel texture, anon.
Why are people here s retrded?
What is the official explanation for the colors? Like why did they decide to put some star blue and another one red? Is there any scientific explanation for it or they just edit any pictures they wants with their favorite palette? It's not science then.
>Is there any scientific explanation for it
It's based off the wavelength of the emitted light.
Thanks
It's a conversion done translating the infrared spectrum into something we can visualize. Same It's done with higher energy x-ray observatories or microwave/radio waves.
I'm on both sides of the argument so my say is the final say because you're all morons that can only think in 1 or 0.
Tell them ok frickers I'm open to this epic le hexagon starscope BUT if this comes out looking not much better than something an amateur astronomer with an iphone can do, you all get a bullet in the head.
surface-level details of distant planets in other galaxies or nothing.
planet-size telescopes that use the sun's gravity as lens are needed for that
Seems reasonable
As a framework could be applied to many things (LHC, quantum computing, gravity waves)
think of it thus way for 10B we could build israel 2.0 on the moon and solve peace in the middle east
wow so edgy
They are both right and wrong. All that money will amount to nothing. We are centuries, maybe in 5 or 6 decades away before we can live on other planets in horrid conditions.
I genuinely get depressed when thinking about space. This is where being an atheist sucks ass. Knowing that all that shit exists out there and we are going to die without ever getting to see anything is very morbid. We are not even wanderers in the darkness, we are simply standing still.
It's a little worse than that. If we're ever-expanding, every year that passes just puts us further and further away from the things we're looking at now.
humans are stupid creatures. They want to race to space before fixing the planet. Humanity will doom itself while they keep doing research to escape.
Smart people can multitask, just in case you were wondering how everyone else lives
>They want to race to space before fixing the planet.
the fix is get the frick out of here
>Go crazy on Mars with all the other colonists due to the severe strain of colonizing space with Mickey mouse science
Or
>Kill the Ns and Semites in Minecraft and enjoy peaceful earth.
>fixing the planet
Black person there is no fixing the planet we already fricked it proper. the solution is to go frick up a different planet.
your moralism homosexualry, there is nothing to fix in the planet, it will continue to exist
humans are smart animal that exists in our planet and exploring and conquering the stars are our destiny as an inteligent species, keep moraly seething at a meaningless ideological drivel, the real ubersmenchs of mankind keep going foward
It can be pretty depressing to think about but if there's anything to take away from it, just be glad that it exists and that in your life right now we're developing the technology to observe and study it better. I don't know how the technology will be in 40 years time but if it's improved a lot we'll be able to see some awesome shit in our lifetimes.
>if it's improved a lot we'll be able to see some awesome shit in our lifetimes.
Like a few extra galaxies? The same thing but slightly higher resolution?
What the frick are you hoping to see?
I'll be able to see my blue skinned alien waifu poledancing specifically for me in 8k ultra high def resolution.
They say memory and imagination elicits the same reaction in the brain as if you were actually doing the thing. So don’t give up on the genre keep having fun imagining the stars.
humanity as a species has forgotten how to make things that have soul, its the current state of things.
homie they're photos of the fricking sky, not paintings by DaVinci
up to the digital age, any photo, even the most dry and technical, looked artistic and had a feel. now everything imaging looks like rushed cgi from marvel.
No you're just a moron
Paintings by the best artist of all, Almighty God.
Wrong board, I want it out: The FF7 Remake. The original wasn't even good to begin with.
>Black folk take pride in being moronic
>mocked on Cinemaphile for it
>anons proceed to take pride in being moronic too with shitty threads like this
was Cinemaphile the Black folk this whole time?
>was Cinemaphile the Black folk this whole time?
Worse. They're contrarians. People will believe the dumbest shit just to be different from the average person.
>Black folk
>anons
>Cinemaphile
>proceeds
So you're all reddit AND Black folk?
What the frick am I supposed to do with this? It doesn't even look cool. It looks like a failed picture of fireworks.
You're meant to post it on Reddit for upvotes
>every single point here is an entire galaxy with maybe millions of civilizations
They should have sent a poet
If there was any intelligent life out there we would have received messages from it by now.
do you have any concept on how far away those galaxies are and how long it takes to send and receive a message from them?
I cant believe you people are real
anon you underestimate the size of space.
There's no such thing as the size of space. Space is eternal.
How? Email?
moron moment
I wish I had saved the pic with the angry soijak guy saying "THE JWST IS GREAT BECAUSE WE CAN SEE THE POOPENFARTEN GALAXY #43799 WITH MORE STARS I FRICKING LOVE SCIENCE". I turned out to be painfully accurate. NASA sucks at making the public care about this stuff.
Space is literally fake and gay. You're looking at AI generated CGI images. All of it is fake and a CGI projection by the deep state.
Fricking wake up you NPCs.
You can’t be white and think space is fake.
I'm israeli
Well there you go. You believe in a cavern universe.
>I HECKIN' HATE Black folk, israeliteS AND gayS!!!!
>Homeless people are... LE BAD!
>SCREW THEM, LETS SPEND ALL OUR MONEY ON PRETTY SPACE PICTURES INSTEAD OF REAL ISSUES!
Why are redditors so heartless bros?
>you can spend 100billion a year on military
>but spending 10% of that over 15 years is not allowed
It's just trolls being trolls. Happens every time people start enjoying things.
Sorry to break the news, but we spend $750 billion on military.
A year?
Are you people for real? Do you believe in santa claus?
Um like instead of wasting 10 billion dollars on a space camera why can't we like send someone up in space with an iphone and take a pic with that? That would be much cheaper!
The coolest stuff doesn't get mentioned
this is what bugs me about charts like this, they just cherry pick certain peaks and say 'this one is neon, this one is argon, etc. etc.' but just act like the other peaks don't exist. What the frick are the other peaks that aren't labeled? If they are going to bother to label shit, why leave those out entirely? Makes shit seem just made up
It's literally because those are the elements of interest.
The point is it took Hubble months to generate its images, and days for Webb to generate similar images, which means the resolution/detail is just going to keep increasing.
I often dream of stars chasing me
The webb reveal really shows how stupid most Cinemaphileners are. NO understanding of economics, physics, or space. It's honestly really sad.
I'm convinced they're just being stupid as frick for (You)s.
Nah these people spend all their time watching childrens shows, it's not surprising they are this dumb.
Most importantly also of culture. Fugues and differential calculus go hand in hand.
>The modern economic system is a house of cards
>Physics in the realm of not being able to defend what a woman is
>implying space colonization is anything but a pipe dream to slurp up dollars
Thanks for proving my point.
>Yeah we got it slightly clearer and turned the saturation up a bunch
>that'll be ten billion plus tip
A single F-35 costs just under $400,000,000,000 and is one of the biggest money pits in US military history.
Bullshit
Sorry that's what the entire program's cost was projected to be and is now up to $1.2 trillion in costs.
F-35 has already been paid off in over-seas sales.
what would happen if I breathed that brown dust? Is it like mud in space or like a dust storm? Why is it there?
Gas in a vacuum
Aren't the colours all added in post-processing anyway
Willy Wonka was a pretty disappointing remake.
Space tech is expensive, yes, but it’s necessary for human advancement. There are asteroids out there and we need to develop our ability to spot and track these things.
>No Pillars of Creation shots yet
when
thats such a ridiculously fake color altered shoop the entire horsehead nebula is kindve reddish, almost everything you see through a telescope is black and white
pic related is closest to what you actual see but way dimmer
Wow no way anon, you're so smart for realizing that NASA uses infra red light and colorizes photos. All this time I was wondering why the night sky wasn't glowing rainbow.
Star Trek 09
>Americans are so cucked they can't even walk outside and see the cosmos
I pity you.
ironically america has way more areas without light pollution than any of europe
>Anons never looked through a telescope
LOL
LMAO
>no flag
OHNONO
and you've never looked through a h-alpha solar scope
i recommend it, probably the coolest thing ive seen with my own eyes
can we point the new hubble to the moon? to a jupiter moon? what level of detail would we see?
They said they'd release the first in-system planet picture tomorrow, so we'll find out then,
Sweet
cool.
>point the new hubble to the moon
That would fry the instruments
its an IR scope meant to look at very old objects, not get high resolution into visible spectrum
weird smeary gravity lensed deep field is about the best we're going to get
It's not a telescope
You can see the moon just as detailed with a 300mm lens.
>should be years deep into exploring mars
>fricking around with more useless desktop background telescopes instead
JUST
Boomers really did get to live through the golden years. All we got is the internet.
Soon anon. Mars is within our reach in the next decade. Don't doom out yet.
Maybe if China starts making moves toward it. I dont trust Musk to deliver. He's been proven an unreliable hype shill with a spotty record.
SpaceX is bigger then musk
What's China up to atm
>the moon landing was fake
>why one
>there was more?
Never fails
*which one
>white cishet males justify burning trillions of dollars with this one neat trick!
>heh the moon landings were faked, BUT EVERYTHING ELSE NASA SHOWS US IS REAL!!!
why are they like this.
It was harder at the time to fake the lunar landing than to actually go to the moon. Also, if it really was fake, Soviet Russia would've called them out.
I personally don't think the landings were faked, I'm just making fun of people that say shit like that but also believe literally everything else NASA says.
Cinemaphile is a VERY low IQ board
Don't watch this shit if you have vertigo
Only brainlets can't appreciate space.
Imagine still thinking the earth is flat
Webb is kind of boring compared to the mars shit coming
this is definitely more impressive. is there video from the chopper?
Yep, no color tho and low FPS.
nice, thanks.
Frick wrong video
They couldn't have sent a color cam?
It does, just it doesn't take pictures fast enough. Also they weren't even sure it would work, and data rates make it not really worth it when it's not the primary payload.
Thanks
Space isn't real you onions cucks, it's all cgi
Actually cgi is an interpretation of data therefore its as real as everything else you see
You are in space right now, you imbecile. It's the same as christcucks/abrahamists coping that there are no aliens, Humans are fricking aliens.
>is this t shirt gray?
>SCIENCEL: uhmmm ackshtually according to these 10 trillion suprared NASA-designed goggles which can see over 600 gorillion superoptical colors on the autism spectrum your t shirt is in fact the color of amy schumer's prolapsed vegana
God lord anon, just admit you are wrong
Its a heckin interpretation of data and all interpretations of data are le real. You are asking the wrong question so I won't even humor you. If I make up stuff its still real because there is a spectrum and there is data.
You make a lot more sense when youre being ironic
Shirt is away 10 million light years. We can only detect it with sensors that dont show us its real color. But we can simulate its real color by coloring the colorless picture of the shirt we have.
Thats what NASA is doing. There is no hidden agenda.
Loos like he's fully mind broken
I know it's fun to pretend to be moronic / to hate the science, but jesus christ you guys
I don't think humanity is going anywhere because of such erratic behavior like this
Putting aside the novelty, would sex in space actually be any good? It seems like it'd just be more difficult to maintain good positions and you'd have to constantly hold your partner against your thrusts.
The best part of this shit was the scuffed livestream
Get with it. Millions of galaxies of hundreds of millions of stars, in a speck on one in a blink. That's us, lost in space...2YS0N2