what movie has the most amount of crazy stuff happen? like having a shootout while falling down a building, reincarnating then getting revenge on people from your past life, or blowing up a 1,000 planets
what movie has the most amount of crazy stuff happen?
I don't know about all that but The Holy Mountain by Jodorowsky might qualify.
>reincarnating then getting revenge on people from your past life
The Crow
>atheists actually believe we evolved from this rock monster
>the entire human race is descended from 2 people with a fruit fetish
No one cares about the ~~*(Old Testament*~~.
We have no cosmological basis for Christianity then.
Might as well become a Hindu at that point.
Love, charity, the golden rule, treat others how you want to be treated, the belief (fact) that we exist and are part of something more and there is shit out there? Yeah, that’s all real. Unlike israelites and their gross blob of meaningless cells cult.
That's the part that has your moronic origin myth that makes you pretend evolution never happened though. You can't on one hand discount science because it goes against your fairytales and then cherry pick only the fairy tales you like from your magic book.
>le fairy tale maymay
You sojnd like such a gay. Next thing you're gonna bring up the flying spagetti monster thing too, huh?
Sorry that me simply pointjng out the logical fallacy in your fairy-tale breaks your tiny brain.
I agree with your points, but calling them "fairy tales" is needlessly condescending, like people who call god a "sky daddy" or whatever
Granted, I was being purposefully condescending to make a point. At the base he was claiming that the New Testament is true while implying the Old Testament is not. He is the one treating religious texts as fairy-tales he can pick what he likes and what he doesn't to fit whatever narrative he is trying to put forth.
A "scientist" who studies the processes and history of species evolving over time who then ignores the areas of science that show the earth to be round and part of a solar system instead of flat would be in the same category.
humans evolved from rock people
grugbros we eatin good tonight
yes
JUST LET YOUR SOOOOUUUUL GLOOOOOOOOW
My favorite bit of that myth is how God is the one lying saying eating the fruit will kill them while the serpent tells the truth that it will give them knowledge, not death. So the serpent gets cursed by the liar god taking it's feet away as punishment and humanity sets out to discover the universe and how it works.
Dude that's just old testament bs. The only part that matters is Jesus coming to give the real truth. Turn the other cheek my friend.
it it doesnt matter, then why have it in the bible in the first place? it's literal canon and no amount of modern christian coping can change the fact that they have shitty lore
No joke, there are Xtians who claim the god of the old testament is a different god from the one in the israelite testament who Jesus represents. That's how far some of these idiots will bend over backwards to make the texts say what they want.
>Dude that's just old testament bs.
same with the book of genesis xcuck. Doesn't stop ya'll from clutching your semitic fairytale book and repeating it over and over ignoring any evidence that contradicts the 3000 year old semite fairytale made by goat herders.
Way more trust worthy than all the top white secular scientists that gave us the theory of evolution.
moron.
They were immortal before eating the fruit.
They got old and died because they ate the fruit.
If they hadn't ate the fruit they wouldn't have died.
It's the direct cause of them dying.
The effect not being instant to make it any less of an effect.
Which line in which translation says they're immortal?
It's nice that they're living in the garden of Eden all naked and not aware but God still gave Eve a razor so she could shave her armpit hair for vanity's sake.
>this is what christcucks actually believe
>some monkey people evolving to be more upright and hairless after millions of years is too farfetched though
Beats being kicked out of a garden for listening to a woman.
I know this is bait but human ancestors are thought to be something like this during dino times. us mammals lived while the dinos died out
Dinosaurs didn’t really die out they were killed. And mammals could only live as rats like that until the world was cleansed with holy fire.
That movie 65 that came out recently I liked. It wasn’t great but it portrayed pre-human dinosaur Earth as this disgusting, horrible hellhole that needed to be wiped out which I thought was cool. In Walking With Dinosaurs and stuff like that the demise of the dinosaurs is always portrayed as tragic but in 65 you just want that meteor to scour the planet of all this nasty, hostile life.
What the frick was her problem?
Okay, something has to be wrong. Either our estimation of the age of the Earth or evolution as a whole. There is no way in a mere 65 million years that rat could go through enough random generational mutations to wind up as a modern human being. Has anyone ever tried to actually quantify and crunch these numbers to see if this is theoretically possible?
these kind of big changes over that amount of time are common
Yeah, ARE they? I’m saying I find it hard to believe. Maybe 65 billion years but millions? Doesn’t add up. How about a fish gaining lungs? How many generations does that fricking take.
how does it not add up? 65 million years is a frick huge amount of time. modern humans didn't even appear until around 200 thousand years ago
I’m saying it MIGHT not add up. There must be some math or a formula to determine this. I’ve never heard of such a thing or heard anyone even hypothesize how many actual separate mutations and whatever it would take to get to the next level and so on. Seems like a rat would need more than 65 million points of mutations/differences to get to a human. So they have to go through 1 big change a year to get to a human? Mice have been the same since I’ve been alive; thousands of generations of them.
>Mice have been the same since I’ve been alive; thousands of generations of them.
some fish have remained relatively unchanged over millions of years, look into living fossils
>Seems like a rat would need more than 65 million points of mutations/differences to get to a human
Why does it seem like that?
It's almost entirely hypothetical anon. These people take wild guesses about shit that they cannot prove beyond mere speculation and morons just take it as a fact.
Science used to be about the observable but now it's moved past that into pure fan fiction about the universe. You shouldn't believe anything is true in regards to science unless it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt.
Get ready for evolutionists to start screeching and lying in response to this excellent post.
there has to be an evolutionary reason for a rat to become a human
rats have always been perfectly adept at surviving wherever they are, they don't need to develop anything to specialize in whatever region they're in, the first ships sailing around the world brought them all with us and spread them throughout the world and they've instantly inhabited every piece of land we came into contact with
Your own logic is falling apart when you count only one generation per year for mice when saying 65 million isn't nearly enough. Then you say clearly mice don't change that fast because in your lifetime there have been thousands of generations. Your assumptions are false because you don't actually understand the process.
You are like those idiots confused by how mirrors work and making idiotic tiktok videos in your amazement.
Okay how about animals like elephants that only have offspring every several years? Flying squirrels became elephants? Ok I’ll buy it but millions of years isn’t enough time. Seems like a mathematical impossibility. I’m obviously not sure but someone smarter than me has to make a model of this to test somehow.
>I’m obviously not sure but someone smarter than me has to make a model of this to test somehow.
You think no one's thought to run those numbers yet? Hell, anti-evolutionists would be all over that shit if it didn't add up.
Flying squirrels don't turn into elephants. The descendants of flying squirrels and the descendants of elephants evolve along different lines as they go through time. The ancestors of flying squirrels are the lightest and fastest which led them to live more of their lives climbing in trees, the ancestors of elephants were the larger ones which stayed on the ground. As they fill different niches, they get more specialized over time.
dude look at what we did to certain dog breeds in the past 400 years
>Seems like a rat would need more than 65 million points of mutations/differences to get to a human
I mean, you can sequence genomes. Rats share around 70% of their genome with humans. cats are about 90. Chimps are about 98.
Chimps diverge from human ancestors about 6 million years ago.
>. There must be some math or a formula to determine this. I’ve never heard of such a thing or heard anyone even hypothesize how many actual separate mutations and whatever it would take to get to the next level and so on.
ahhh so you've just decided to go to the Internets today and be an embarrassment.
>I don't know a single shit but I have an opinion
well you are moron
The key is in your final observation. *A* rat would never achieve this, but as you correctly pointed out, rats have thousands of generations in your lifetime alone. Now imagine a rat having a multiple litters per year. And members of each litter having multiple litters per year. It’s not a hundred moneys randomly typing at a hundred keyboards for a hundred years. It’s so much beyond that that it almost defies conception. It’s billions of rats over millions of years, with favorable traits out-competing less favorable ones to survive and procreate.
>Seems like a rat would need more than 65 million points of mutations/differences to get to a human.
Not if you actually study genetics. One small change in the right gene can result in a significant change to the organism, and a rat's genome already carries most of the important building blocks you would need to evolve into a human
Okay so how many mutations would it take to get to a human? How many mutations to get from gills to lungs? 1,000 mutations? 10,000 mutations? 100,000,000 mutations? You’re the expert.
Are you asking how many mutations it would take minimum if you were intelligently guiding the mutations or how many it would take on average by random mutation? I hope you also are aware that more than one mutation can occur per generation
Yeah sure, take all variables into account, like environmental changes, whatever, try to establish a model and quantify it. Seems like a fun thought excersize at least.
Well it's a bit like solving a maze, there would be far more dead ends and only one path to the answer. The distance between the entrance and exit would not be very far, but the path taken would be very meandering and inefficient. In practice it would probably take tens of thousands of mutations, but only a thousand or so are really necessary
> Human who has been a person for maybe a couple of decades thinks he can intuit how the universe works over millions of years
You sound like my freshman year roommate in college, ie like you've begun to think about the world for the first time in your life and feel like you're the first human to ever have thoughts. It'll pass as you start to get answers to your questions
Show me the math then, genius.
If you have genuine intellectual curiosity, there are literally thousands of books on the topic, it's baby's first science topic. If you just want to look smart, I would suggest trying another tactic (assuming you want to continue not actually learning and educating yourself)
Thousands of books huh? Like what? Show me an article or published work that goes into how many specific individual mutations it might take to gain lungs from gills; then I wanna see a paper about it said number of mutations could possibly occur in a millions of years time span. Yeah; there’s books that say “evolution totally occurred over generations!” okay, how? What might trigger a fish to gain a lung? To get from a gill to a king would require millions of generations and mutations at least. I think we need to move a decimal point over a notch or something when carbon dating, something doesn’t add up.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lungfish
I'm not that anon, and I think that evolution sometimes requires some strange outcomes, but you specifically are asking about something we still have an extent living missing link showing the intermediary between gilled fish and lunged tetrapod.
>extent
extant
Yeah so how many mutations did it take to get from fish to lungfish? 5? 500? 5 billion?
57
>Yeah so how many mutations did it take to get from fish to lungfish? 5? 500? 5 billion?
you are assuming directionality and teleology in evolution.
This isn't how evolution works.
Mutation is random and evolution and speciation is just our ex post facto assessment of when a significant (in our eyes) change has occurred. between descendants.
>Fish has a mutant fish baby with slightly different airsacs attached to its gills.
>That fish isn't particularly disadvantaged by its different (compared to its siblings and parents) gill sacs, so it keeps swimming and passes its genes along making more babies with different gills.
>this keeps happening randomly, every so often, and eventually that fish's descendant has lunglike gills, and we declare it a separate species and call it a lungfish, because its lunglike gills resemble lungs.
>These lunglike gills lets lungfish spend some small amount of time out of water breathing air, which turns out to be advantageous and thus more lungfish are created and spread their lunglike gills all over the place.
>eventually those lunglike gills accumulate so many random mutations that they're what we would recognize as lungs and not gills at all, but just keep in mind that this is all our own separate ex post facto distinction, and declaring this or that descendant to be the start of a new species is a bit arbitrary like when does yellow turn into orange and then turn into red.
Does that help?
then evolution stopped. all human populations are exactly the same. you cannot question this or be deemed racist and unclean. evolution stopped.
>evolution stopped
Nobody believes humans are living fosssils
human haplogroups are accepted by scientists what are you even talking about
there are different species of human but you cannot refer to it that way
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10251849/ rofl
>65 billion years
homie the earth is only like 5 bil years old.
except this fossil record doesn't hold up to any actual scrutiny, FUN FACT: nearly all fossils supporting human evolution are bs, with missing fossils, made up links, I mean Lucy is just a regular ape skeleton, it's crazy
Lucy is significantly different from ape skeletons but props for boasting about how little you know as a way of trying to insist that because you are ignorant, everyone else is as well.
don't even respond to these morons, they are actually moronic
strange how if you look up all the "links" between man and ape, they're all either missing or accidentally destroyed, whoops.
>Okay, something has to be wrong.
They're just not telling us everything. There had to have been something that triggered the human path of evolution at some point.
Sure, but whales are still primitive animals in comparison to humans. No matter how intelligent dolphins or gorillas are, they don't even come close to all the shit humans have created/accomplished. That's why something sounds off about the "official" scientific explanation on human evolution.
Humans are fallen, that is why. Whales and gorillas don't need technology. They don't need to work an office job day in day out so they can pay someone else for the privilege to sleep where they like or buy food to eat. You think a whale is less intelligent than you because it doesn't have an iphone. The reality is the whale is far, far more intelligent as well as wise than you are because connects with existence and does not have any use for an iphone.
Whales still get btfo if we decide to destroy them.
You say that as if it's a point of pride. You don't understand that you and whales are part of the same whole. It's no different than saying your hands are better than your eyes because if you want to, your hands can easily gouge your eyes out. You are merely a violent, cancerous fool.
Fricking based. Whales are the Zen philosophers of Earth species. We should acknowledge that and embrace our contrasting role. Whales are content just in being; we are discontent in doing/knowing. We are Earth’s adventuring species, and we should get busy doing it.
The Dutch went from being among the shortest people in the world to the tallest ones in like 100 years due to sexual selection (at least that's the official explanation), it's possible.
Pretty sure it coincided with improvements in their diet due to the Flemish becoming rich as frick from 1600s onwards.
Something similar happened in Europe after the 50s, the average Italian was 5'5 now is 5'9 and zoomers from upper class families are all 6'0/6'1, it's nutrition.
The Japanese have a healthier diet and live longer but are likely less picky about getting a partner in terms of things like height and looks and they are short as frick so height probably is more to do with sexual selection
>less picky about getting a partner in terms of things like height and looks
you have no idea what you are talking about.
japan is even more obsessed with looks and beauty than the west, they have FAR more men and women who buy cosmetic surgery and their culture of venerating youth borders on pedophilia. their dating norms are brutal if you are an indigenous japanese, westerners are biased because they are a novelty in this homogenous society and usually have an easier time dating and their small ignorance of dating norms are usually looked over.
Big tulip was keeping them down
they had to evolve to keep their heads above water
Yes, the numbers don't work. Evolutionists respond to that fact with endless cope and seethe.
>There is no way in a mere 65 million years
How in frick you could tell? Have you been here longer than 65 000 000 years and witnessed all this so you have experience? Do you posses the knowledge of some mathematical model which is verified beyond any doubts? Huh? Come on, show us.
How the frick could YOU tell? Why are lefties ITT up in arms shooting down the idea? It’s a discussion that frankly should be had. There must be a way to quantify at least theoretically the amount of changes needed to transform from a squirrel to human. Or fish to lizard. Or whatever.
Because the ydid the due dilligence and looked at a tree of life once or twice which is way more insightful than 3000 year old israelite fairytales
>WHY WON'T THEY ENTERTAIN MY IDEA THAT THIS ONE ANCIENT FAIRYTALE IS THE ANSWER TO ALL OF LIFE'S MYSTERIES!!!!
idk because there are literally thousands of man made fairytales what makes yours so special?
Okay okay we get it, you’re a fierce advocate for trans kids and you pretend to believe male children are women. You hate White people and Christ and procreation and want to kill everyone and jerk off in your VR coom den doing drugs supplied to you for “free” by the government. I hear you LOUD and clear buddy, you’re a moronic insane rapist. I’m a Catholic and I acknowledge Christ and the natural process of evolution to be real btw. You’re just a meaningless blob of cells and a useless eater, take your own advice and leap off a stool already, you ugly man lmao
This homie mad
Only insane deranged trannies and israelites like this have such demented, frothing hatred and malice over the concept of God and pretend Christians think the world is 2,000 years old and dinosaurs don’t exist. That’s just made up israelite bullshit like muslims wanting to suicide to rape 72 virgins or whatever. Christians created science, society, evolution and the language you’re using. Atheists believe male children are women and that the animal from the OP image which clearly has a scaly, armored hide was actually covered in bushy pink feathers and you’re an antisemite if you disagree.
Atheists are moronic, mentally ill madmen that are fiercely combative about their meaningless cell blob cult because they know they’re going to Hell. Christians are just normal people interested in knowledge and reality. Unlike leftists who again believe male children are women and that cutting their wieners off is progressive medicine fricking lol
>Why are lefties ITT up in arms shooting down the idea?
>if you understand evolution you're a leftist
what the frick are you smoking
See
>irrational image of boogeyman
kek
who are you talking to?
he's sperginout and talking to himself in circles going on a shizo rage because everybody who doesn't worship israeli goat herders and vote for zion miga is definitely a troony. I made multiple poitns that have yet to be rebuked but I'm a troony because I don't agree with santa yahweh jesus and told them that trannies have more evidence than talking snakes.
image of boogeyman
Nta, but that but the most you could claim is that's an exaggeration, the U.S. embarrassingly has flown lgbt, and blm banners on our embassies.
you mentioned it first you freak. I made multiple points that have yet to be rebuked all you could muster up the courage to do was call me a troony. christiasn are intellectually weak. and need to fall back on a scapegoat because they can't argue their points because their is no point to argue. People in 200 ad knew christianity was a collection of stories. It's sad that people in 2000AD with computers at their finger tips believe in 3000 year old goat herder fairytales about a talking snake ribwich woman who fricked her sons creating humanity.
Hey i'm a troony though oh no I guess that means your 3000 year old semite goat herder stories suddenly make sense you got me....
My point is, you trust the same people that say men can be women?
I would've been more open to evolution if the same fricks didn't say that cutting off your wiener and dressing in drag makes you girl. And I would be more open to discussion if you weren't a reddit spacing troony.
>scientists are one group of people and palaeontologists are also psychologists
How did you derive that from that post? Lefties are seething for no reason at a proposed thought experiment.
>SHUT UP CHUD THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED MEN ARE WOMEN!
okay? no one even suggested evolution is fake or anything like that, only saying that something doesn’t add up in the theory of evolution, either that or our estimation of the Earth’s age is wrong. Sorry if that makes them flip out and piss their wiener cages and diapers because it goes against whatever currently wikipedia and Steven Colbert says or whatever.
I know what you mean.
The main evidence for evolution is the fact that all animals fit onto "the tree" exactly where you expect them to be. Like tigers and cats look similar, act similar, and it turns out share the most amount of DNA, compared to say dogs.
Then you get surprising ones that only make sense when you explain it through evolution. Like whales and hippos. They have a lot in common biologically, then it turns out they share almost 100% of DNA, moreso than a hippo and rhino for example, which you might expect from looking at them. Then they find the fossils of a different extinct animal from which it's plausible they both may have evolved from.
Humans can't comprehend a million years. The written human record is only about 0.5% of a million years. Some of evolution happens slowly and some of it quick
you are just moronic and your brain cant comprehend the timescale of millions years
Anon do you have any idea how long 1 million years is?
>I have no idea how long 65 million years is
Anon stop for a second and think: a larva on the ground lives a couple of days then it creates a cocoon around itself and emerges a week later as a completely different being, this entire process can be observed happening live. A chicken shits out a hard-shelled ball of goop, a couple of weeks later a fully-formed mini-chicken comes out of said ball of goop and less than a year later it has grown into a full-sized chicken. A human, with it's ridiculously complex brain capable of conceiving abstract thoughts takes a mere 9 months to appear inside a woman after a single sperm cell getting inside a single ovum, and the resulting human can vary greatly and even be a deformed abomination due to minute changes in genetic code.
You know all this to be true, you can see it happening with your own eyes within the span of a single year, yet somehow you have trouble believing that even crazier shit could happen over millions of years in a world far more unstable than ours?
this is such fricking nonsense. People actually believe this crap too.
>we used le special program to make a rat!!! THIS IS YOUR ANCESTOR!!!!
Yeah bro a magical, permanently absent, ethereal interdimensional man conjured up a lookalike, at a completely arbitrary moment in time, on this specific planet, then proceeded to conjure up another one that looked a bit different out the first one's rib, gave it the most fail ridden and awkward process to replicate that just happens to be present in nearly all other forms of life in one way or another. It was all recorded a few times in different similar interpretations in a very narrow period of time of a few thousand years, then never again and we never interact with said being ever again. He also cares about specific rules we should follow, but this doesn't apply to any other organism on Earth. He also made trillions and trillions of random rocks that inhabit an unfathomable expanse of space that have completely no purpose and harbour nothing, yet have trillions of random differing attributes.
YAAASSSS, SISTER!!!
PREACH!!!
TRUST THE SCIENCE!!!
you don't need to trust science at all just use common sense and look at a chimp skeleton, we're just upright hairless chimps nothing special. Makes much more sense than being made from clay by a semitic pot demon.
Literally just look at these dudes. we are so clearly just upright apes. I don't need any scientist man to tell me that.
Also
>chuds in court
>oh yeah you have dna evidence against me you really want to trust le science LOL
>Chuds: “Men aren’t women.”
>the scientific community:
>can't rebuke any of my points
>randomly mentions his troony obsession
right wingers never change.
>muh scientific community
I hopeyou know peopel are divided on the troony issue. Meanwhile xcucks blindly follow a book with a talking snakes. HEy going to just throw this out there. More evidence for tranneis than talking snakes or people made from clay or a giant boat with two of every species... I mean might have made sense 3000 years ago but now we know there are billions of separate species. Noah had quite the work cut out for him.
>uses common sense to say some have veganas
>can't use common sense and realize we are upright chimps not human ribwich made of clay and incest freaks who fricked their mom
hey who did cain and abel mate with anyway.....
oh wait people knew this shit was allegory in 200AD yet xcucks still take it literally 2000 years after charles darwin lived.
I didn’t read this because I made a big point (men aren’t women) and you are now arguing with me. Im sorry to say, but you’re wrong based on tangible reality. Men are in fact men and not women believe it or not.
I never argued your point. I am not agreeing with trannies either I am merely just stating the fact that trannies have more evidence than your talking snake ribwich pot shard demon book. Which is literally functionally zero.
>trannies have more evidence
KEK LOL WHAT??????? what evidence, their rotting crotch? have a nice day, you mentally ill pedophile
>5'11 vs 6ft
is this picture supposed to turn me against the most common scientific discovery which is a debate exclusively in the us?
>rodent ancestor
Must have taken the DNA sequence from a israelite
>atheists actually believe we evolved from this rat
so if this thing would've got eaten by a compsognathus none of us would exist?
>65
why do people keep doing this, the mesozoic ended 66 million years ago
does 65 just sound better or something
Can we go back to being cute little rats in the woods instead of whatever we are today?
No, get back to work wagie
It’s a paid holiday here today
When you realize this evolved into those treemonkeys which became regular monkeys and so on its more believable
>There are "living fossil" animals alive today that are completely unchanged from the dinosaur era
>But one random fish evolved into a rat then evolved into humans just because
Maybe I would believe the science if it didn't implode and miraculously reconstruct itself every time they find a fricking tooth or knuckle bone in a European cave.
are "living fossil" animals alive today that are completely unchanged from the dinosaur era
except that's not true at all coelcanths and crocodiles only resemble their anceiont ancestors because of convergent evolution they are actually quite diverged from the ancient samples. oh wait christ chuds even knowing what the frick they are talking about as if.
>They look identical and have the same bone structure but they're totally different!
You can talk around it all you want, maybe point to some numbers, but there's still the same. Evolution abandoned them, so sad.
>>They look identical and have the same bone structure but they're totally different!
genetically, yes.
Here's the tree of life for coelcanths btw. They aren't even the same species as the ones found in the fossi lrecord. You actually have no idea what you are talking about. Might aswell just group all birds together, hey they have wings. God xcuck are so anti intellectual it hurts.
>dude muh resemblence
what if i told you ichthyosaurs, dolphins and sharks aren't related at all xcuck despite sharing the same body plan?
Horseshoe crabs and many other animals haven't changed at all in 450 million years, but you guys always have an explanation for everything.
even horseshoe crabs have several modern species (aka there are differences between living horseshoe crabs, who are in turn different from the 440 million year old ancestors to today's HSC, perhaps if you actually did any research at all instead of taking hyperbole as fact you could get somewhere in these awful fricking threads instead of incessantly repeating idiotic shit.
>just because
Yeah an wolves changed into dogs "just because" too
>hypothetical ancestor
It's crazy how much of science is "in order for our beliefs to be correct, X would have to be true, therefore X is true."
you should google ghost lineages and learn more about it. but in short it is when we figure out that just as you have a grandma, she presumably also has a grandmother - now you have never met her (and for the purposes of this analogy have never seen any photos or heard any descriptions of her) but using pictures of her children and their children you can make an educated guess what she looks like, no? it might not be perfect and it will always stay hypothetical until you find an actual picture of her and correctly identify her as such, but you are going to get reasonably close.
>Humans evolved from rats
Atheists are seriously fricking brain-dead...
And so where do you think humans came from?
...no actually.
Thats not how the supposed course of events happened.
Dinosaurs had to die out for our ancestors to evolve into what we see today.
Only if you're a bird Christgay
Sweet Movie 1974 if you substitute all that stuff with piss, shit, vomit, etc. Pink Flamingos too now that I mention it.
b-but muh feathers?
kek, just you watch if a lefty designed that thing it would be bushier than a hairy troony’s ass after they hang themselves and the hair grows out for a bit
The A-Team movie has a scene where they fly a tank that fell out of an airplane by shooting it's cannon.
is the whole movie like that or is it just that one scene? that's the only thing I see from that movie ever get posted
It's by far the best scene in the movie, the rest is pretty boring. There is some funny (intentional) overacting throughout the entire movie if you like that sort of stuff.
All I remember was that scene and I couldn’t understand anything the new Mr T was saying because he’s not an actor and couldn’t enunciate
The entirety of the original Yugioh! anime is pretty insane.
But trannies said it had feathers
Inb4 trannies don’t realize that’s a mummified dinosaur
I went to Drumheller to see this. Best preserved dinosaur in the world by far. Worth a trip to Canada
This thing is 112million yrs old btw. The meteor fell nearly 50 fricking million years after it died
Did someone edit out the erect penis in this pepe?
That’s awesome.
If anyone else goes make sure you go in the evening at 6 or 7pm. Otherwise it’s filled with screaming jeets. I grew up around there and it’s a travesty what’s happened with the hordes of jeets coming in to ruin it. I went at 7pm in summer and there were maybe 10 other people in the museum.
Why are non-whites so rude? Can you just have manners in public for all of our sakes? Frick.
hardcore henry is the most nuts fps action movie out there if you want to turn your brain off
It's this.
This
Hotel Inferno 1-3. Insanity.
ah, too bad I'm not a fan of horror.
whatever movie it is where they have the giant ass bar fight where Hitler is getting up on the counter in the background and shouting while someone else is throwing cream pies everywhere.
Where are the feathers?
Not the answer racists want to hear but the most correct answer nonetheless, Everything Everywhere All At Once.
Jupiter Ascending.
>Aliens seed worlds with their genetics just so they can wait around billions of years just to harvest the results to make the equivalent of alien foreskin cream, but the aliens are also human and seeking a genetic “reincarnation” of their Queen but her rival sends a wolf/man hybrid to kill her who instead becomes her protector in a strange amalgam of Snow White and Little Red Riding Hood where the Big Bad Wolf is also the Prince.
>people think this very obvious clay sculpture is a real dinosore
Why are you lying, troony?
>https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/08/a-dinosaur-so-well-preserved-it-looks-like-a-statue/535782/
Evolution is just a theory.
Scoentific theories are logical explanation of observed natural phenomena that are consistent with observations and experiments.
Evolution is the observed phenomenon, the thory is just our way of explaining how and why it happens.
so is it objectively true, in the sense of empiricism?
would be a shame if our scientific understanding of the world can (and frequently has) changed due to new experiments, evidence, and understanding.
>so is it objectively true, in the sense of empiricism?
Evolution or the theory?
Evolution yes, we can observe bacterial populations evolve antibiotic resistance with a simople experiment. We have all the examples of domestic plants and animals we've altered radically trough artificial selection. The fossil record shows that species are constantly being born and dying off.
The theory, more or less. All scientific theories are subject to change if new evidence appears that contradicts or complements them in some way. The omics revolution is revealing a whole bunch of new aspects of inheritance processes and the evolutionary development, but for the moment the model stands.
so we're in shades of grey, not black or white. the totality of evolution could be wrong - 100% of the theory. that old thought experiment of the universe (including all human memory) coming into being five minutes ago.
as a bacterial example: anaerobic bacteria. didn't fit the model we were pretty certain of, turns out that's how we'd been producing linen for thousands of years. light is another good example.
any form of denialism is anti-scientific. if i say "the theory of evolution is false" (not something i believe, but bear with me) and you say/believe "that is incorrect" then you are just as dogmatic as any religion, faith-based, "pseudoscience" system you'd care to name.
>the totality of evolution could be wrong
Well, no. What you're talking about is philosophy, at which point you might as well throw science out the window, because any evidence you may find was just placed there by Satan to mislead you.
>anaerobic bacteria. didn't fit the model we were pretty certain of, turns out that's how we'd been producing linen for thousands of years. light is another good example.
I don't know what shitty tract you've read, but go on, post it, I could do with a laugh.
>if i say "the theory of evolution is false"
Then you would need evidence to support your theory. Overwhelming evidence, given everything else we've found points to evolution. You can't just go "well, I don't THINK so". With the absence of any evidence, all you have is an untested hypothesis that doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
probably some weird wuxia film
also Scott Pilgrim, frick it
Advent children
>what movie has the most amount of crazy stuff happen? like having a shootout while falling down a building, reincarnating then getting revenge on people from your past life, or blowing up a 1,000 planets
probably this
I hope you're happy with how your thread turned out, OP
>this silences the semite pot shard demon worshipper.
The curvature of those branches bothers me. The timeline starts in the bottom left, right? At least let the belly of the branches point to the right.
Probably Top Secret.
All these science soibois seething ITT over the tree of life and evolution will then with a straight face in the same sentence say humans and blacks are the same species.
if your wife can get impregnated by them, they are the same species as you
kek, I knew I’d get a seethe from some troony
>christcuck arguing against evolution by using hybrid species
ooooof i guess yahweh santa jesus just let these closely related species interbreed to like test us or something OOF
No one is arguing against evolution. You’re just seething and coping trying to pretend there is no God because you know you’re going to Hell. Lmao shouldn’t have groomed all those kids to troon out and later open their wrists on discord all so you could jerk off to it, you disgusting diaper wearing homosexual (lefty) lol
>immediately starts talking about "her" shitdick fetish with a dash of cuckolding
i really need god to be real
>movie
The first 3 parts of the JoJo anime are pretty fricking bonkers.
>5th grade biology confuses xstians.
SUCKER PUNCH
It's not exactly action but Brazil has always been too overwhelming for me to watch because of the amount of crazy shit that's happening
>why can these two closely related species interbereed? Common ancestor and close genetic structure?
>ERMM no the semite pot demon who looked out for this specific desert tribe 3000 years ago felt like it.
Crank 2 opens with a man falling out of an aircraft and living and goes on to him having frick his girlfriend on a horse track set to a country song, a weird dance-like number with a transvestite with tourrettes, a kaiju fight in a power plant, and a shootout with a reanimated head in a jar at a cartel pool party.
>work with actual dinosaur fossils every day
>women souring up the place with their daily hatred towards the other women
It wasn't supposed to be this way
>&190525388
Ok literally no one knows what you’re talking about. We get it, you hate God and want everyone who believes to suffer because…. idk, you’re insane? Have fun dilating in Hell with Satan’s thorny wiener lmao
even if 99% of the data was against trannies and only 1% of the data said trannies existed that is still way more evidence than for talking snakes or noahs flood or a burning bush or moses going to the top of mt sinai and getting the 10 commandments.
Because there is functionally zero proof for any biblical fairy tail story happening. Any fringe theory supported by just just one shred of evidence is way more than xstianity has going for it.
I wonder why chstians hate trannies when they both rely on "their feelings" over facts and data. They are essentially the same.
>grrr you think you are a girl that is bullshit
>I think there is a talking snake ribwich women who fricked her sons and made humanity that's different.......
trannies and christians are functionally the same they rely on feelings and faith.
Here's an animated short film, which is also a musical that kinda fits this https://youtu.be/lrzKT-dFUjE?si=WQifik0WANQRfPSC
Ankylosaurus?
His brother, the nodosaur.
Dinosaurs are not real, that thing is not even real it's plaster and cement
ooooooooooooooookay troony
leftists are mentally fricking ill
>le the earth is 6000 years old xD
>literal proof that the world is older than that
>YHWH was just fooling bro
> the earth is 6000 years old
This is just insane bullshit israelites make up on TV to attack Christians, same way they make fun of muslims for suiciding for 72 virgins. Just ignorant bullshit.
>little moron who thinks le israelites are different than le christians when he worships someone born and raised 100% culturally israeli thinks hes the only smart person in the room
lmao could only imagine what goes on in your moronic anti-semitic christcuck head that you cant even admit that the fricking bible dates the creation of the earth to no more than 10,000 years ago.
Whoa, didn’t read. Go suck a baby’s dick, rabbi.
I get how evolution is supposed to work. I understand your explanation. That too is how I believe it works but the timeframe like I said doesn’t add up. Maybe it does, but I need a figure or a vague guestimation ffs. Like, okay what in theory was the first mutation that would lead to having lungs? Slightly more swollen gills or something? What is the exact step by step process and how many steps could there be, a high and a low estimate. Math. We can crunch these numbers.
every single time you procreate sexually you mix genes. so you have mutations every single time you make babies, how do you define what is a "mutation" as you want to count them, and what is just meaningless noise? how would you possibly showcase that across what is essentially stone imprints of dead things bones?
>how do you define what is a "mutation" as you want to count them, and what is just meaningless noise?
Idk let’s put our heads together and brainstorm?
>Maybe it does, but I need a figure or a vague guestimation ffs. Like, okay what in theory was the first mutation that would lead to having lungs? Slightly more swollen gills or something?
More or less. Some fish living in shallow muddy water start to develop different gills dealing with that environment, the ones that gain that trait survive better in even shallower, more muddy water. Repeat over and over and eventually you get something better out of the mud than in it.
It's also important to note how much some species change as they grow. Frogs are completely aquatic when born and breathe via gills, but when they mature into a fully grown frog the gills disappear and they breathe with lungs. Many amphibians are like that.
>That too is how I believe it works but the timeframe like I said doesn’t add up. Maybe it does, but I need a figure or a vague guestimation ffs.
First of all we're talking timeframes of hundreds of millions of years and most animals have reproduction rates of multiple times per year. There is absolutely time for evolution to take place.
>Like, okay what in theory was the first mutation that would lead to having lungs? Slightly more swollen gills or something?
Possibly. We don't have data that precise. I get what you're asking for, but we don't have it, because we're looking at bones of extinct animals and the fossil record as a whole to make "hypothetical links" between different species.
>What is the exact step by step process and how many steps could there be, a high and a low estimate. Math. We can crunch these numbers.
Again we don't have these exact numbers, but we can look at how many millions of years between seeing x species, and then seeing the first x.2 species in the fossil record that we think is a descendant.
I think it's a lot more imprecise than what you're asking for, but I don't think time as you're imagining it is as big a bottleneck as you think, because animals do a lot of fricking in 1 million years.
Tell that to all the fundamentalists who believe that very literally.
No lol. They don’t. And if you’re talking about weird NuChrist Chirch of the universe lgbtq bullshit whatever that doesn’t count.
There are huge swaths of people who take the bible literally to that degree. They think you are crazier than you think they are. You don't speak for all Christians
The Bible never says shit about thousand of years or 4,000 years or any of that shit. That’s literally israelite/universe church psychosis. Catholics literally invented modern science.
this. it's a lot of assumptions and guesswork that some dumb proddies did to "age" the planet to thousands of years based on their interpretation of the Bible.
The Bible doesn't say that shit.
the bible says whatever you want it to. this is why there are several dozen christian denominations
So are those people not Christians to you?
Tell that to these guys lol
https://arkencounter.com/
Ask me how I know you didn't grow up in middle America
Evolution is all well and good and seems reasonable to me but I personally believe humans were specifically genetically engineered or somehow accelerated in their development
Mad Max: Fury Road
This was an actual dragon, not a dinosaur which they retconned it to be.
You're correct in that it's not technically a dinosaur. That's a very large prehistoric reptile which is in a different classification. It's more related to crocodiles which among other large reptiles were the basis of dragon stories. Our friend dimetrodon which is a large amphibian is another cool example
The OP animal is a nodosaurus which is an ankylosaur, which is a dinosaur you dumb pseud midwit.
Kung Fury.
You might not like this answer, but it's true.
I remember the opening for Crank 2 being fairly ludicrous in its gratuitousness.
The Good, the Bad, and the Weird
Transporter 2
>Somehow no predators wiped out birds when they went through hundreds of thousands of years with half formed wings that couldn't fly, and could no longer be used to claw and climb.
Southland Tales.
Unironically. Movie is just crazy shit after crazy shit and you don’t know what the frick is happening.
>open thread expecting talk about wacky out of control films I've never seen
>instead it's 18 hours of gay bullshit that looks like it was copypasted straight out of 2008 era youtube atheism/religion video reply slapfights
I fricking hate you Black folk sometimes.