what possesses a person to think every waking moment of their life is being watched over by a higher power
lunaticity
what possesses a person to think every waking moment of their life is being watched over by a higher power. lunaticity
what possesses a person to think every waking moment of their life is being watched over by a higher power
lunaticity
The idea that your life matters and your actions have reality in the universe? That you actually exist in a meaningful way? Or something like that, I know you guys don’t know that feeling
>matters
>universe
See, your problem is, you can only perceive the universe in human terms (dozens of years) when the universe operates in terms of trillions of years. The entire existence of human history will be confined to our solar system, or local cluster at most and will comprise approximately .00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001% of the timeline of the universe. Once the sun expands and vaporizes Earth, there will be no trace of humankind left and it will be as if we never existed. Your life means nothing to the universe.
>Humanity or whatever it evolves into won't be able to move somewhere else within the next 7 billion years because... Because it just won't, ok?
For Catholics indoctrinated guilt. For israelites narcissism. For mudslimes insecurity and inadequacy. For Hindus a fear of having to poo in the loo.
>tfw you realize god exists
It’s just their sad, delusional egos. “Sky Daddy has got my back!”
>Delusional
Says the guy who doesn't believe in Warp 9.75, or 2500 times faster than light!
But believes a meson sized particulate that possessed Several Universal Masses in an area no larger than a meson self.created and expanded 32 trillion times faster than light (the big bang)!
In regards to
>expanded 32 trillion times faster than light
Why wouldn't it be able to expand faster than light?
>Science is Observation, Test, and where applicable Re-creation
Show us using science, anything surpassing light 32 trillion times
Nonono, I'm asking in regards to your hypothesis why you think the universe wouldn't be able to expand faster than the speed of light.
I can easily supply my thoughts on the matter (the universe expanding is increasing the space between objects, whereas light would be moving within space between objects).
I'm asking why you think the former must conform to the latter's speed.
>The Universe is so supernatural and stuff
You don't believe in the Supernatural remember?
Science is Observation, Test and where applicable Re-creation. No speculation, No Make Believe, just Science!
>>The Universe is so supernatural and stuff
I didn't state that. I asked what your hypothesis is, since you don't agree with the mainstream viewpoint on how the universe came to be, while providing an explanation for the contradiction you perceived in the predominant theory.
If you refuse to provide one, I'll just assume you're completely wrapped up in anti-Scientism and therefore reject everything about empiricism.
Science isn't hypothesis. Science is Observation Test and Where Applicable Re-creation!
>Science is whatever strawman i need it to be to win internet arguments
Kill self gay
Science Is Observation Test and Where Applicable Re-creation!
Speed of light isn't a StrawMan, it was Observed, Tested and Recreated!
who types like this, with capitalisation all over the fricking shop?
We're gonna need Observation and Test of an event exceeding light speed 32 trillion times.
>32 Trillion times faster than light
>least ridiculous
I agree, we only know little about mass and expansion due to dark energy
Big bang is simply the least ridiculous theory proposed so far that accounts for cosmic microwave background and what, by our understanding, can be nothing other than the continuing expansion of the universe.
Studying the universe was insanely difficult for thousands of years and has only become relatively simple in less than a century.
Paradigm shifts are to be expected. It is foolish to believe we're anywhere near the end point of knowledge in lots of things, especially space.
>Big Bang is least ridiculous
Then show us Matter Moving 32 trillion times faster than light!
You don't have a less ridiculous theory than Big Bang, thus, it's the least ridiculous.
This reality requires a Creator. Something cannot come from nothing in this universe we live in.
That Creator revealed Himself through the events of the Bible and his Son Jesus Christ.
We live in a fallen world. Turn to him while you have the chance.
what created the creator?
Argh you got me.
humans were created by a higher power, yes
BUT
if you think life is a random coincidence, then why dont we look like pic related
>cast a child with full blown 5 o'clock shadow to portray kid Conan
Based
normalgays all have main character syndrome.
So, they aren't npc, unlike you.
I am an npc and it is ok
>lunaticity
it's LUNACY, you fricking ESL b***h
Nice try, Satan.
>anything I don't like is DUH SAYTANNNN
This is your brain on monotheism.
Sure, Satan. Sure.
Logically there must be "something" that created the reality, though if that's a god or not comes down to personal interpretation. If there's an effect there must be a cause so something must have caused cause and effect. That's all we can say for sure though since answers are impossible to get now, maybe forever.
>did "something" exist before causality (logic)?
>is it conscious?
>if so then is it conscious like us?
>does it still exist?
>if "something" existed before causality then did it stop existing after?
>if so does it still exist outside causality?
>if something is conscious, still exists and is still anti-causality then did it have any part in human affairs?
>if so then is it currently observing?
I don't think we'll ever find an answer to these things since finding evidence of something that happened before and outside of logic is impossible. Here's a snake.
But Crom doesn't watch over you. He just chills in his mountain and when you die he asks you about the riddle of steel and if you can't answer it, you're fricked.