What scenes could have been added to The Witch to make it better?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
What scenes could have been added to The Witch to make it better?
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
anything
anything?
Full on gape scene with Anya and Mike Adriano with me holding the camera
>with me holding the camera
Zoomers are a lost generation
this but i'm mike adriano and the zoomer cuck with the camera isn't in the room
Agreed. Anya needs a nice gape scene.
Did he retire or something? Why no new content on any of his sites?
jonni darkko would be better
>knows name of porn prostitutes
she should have fricked Black Philip with him changing form between the goat and Satan during sex, that would have been kino
and the scene ends right when he cums and its a shot of the goats face going BAaAAaAA
>Satan is grunting
>Thomasin starts having her first orgasm
>Goat bleats
>Cut to black. The end
come on, that would have been a great ending.
I was trying to be funny but yes I unironically think that would be good. Not as the ending, just as another effective shock scene like the breastfeeding crow one. Memeable but disturbing
>"So Norm, I've been told you're quite the film buff. Watch anything exciting recently?"
>"Well there was this one movie I watched on the computer. you know how they got the netflix on the computer now?
>"Yeah, Netflix, streaming. You streamed the movie"
>"Yeah...I 'streeeaamed it'" *looks over to andy and points to conan with his thumb*
>"Check out this fricking nerd."
>audience gigles
>"So anyways I was watching this movie called uh...it was was called... the VEE VITCH"
>"The V-vitch? Don't you mean the Witch?"
>"Nah it's the V-vitch. Apparently they didn't have the letter DOUBLE-U in the olden days ya know? 'Cus they were poor and all that?"
>"uh huh"
>"So anyways I was watching the V-Vitch and towards the end who do you think shows up?" *waits for conan*
>"Was it the v-vitch?"
>"Nah it was just the devil"
>audience laughs
>"And so the devil says to the girl he says JOIN ME AND I WILL GIVE YOU BUTTER"
>conan chuckles "uh huh"
>"And so I thought that's a strange bribe to tempt someone into your demonic cult with ya know."
>conan: "sure but it was the old days, butter was a luxury"
>"yeah but this is the DEVIL we're talking about ya know? LU-CI-FER. The second most powerful being next to GOD. You'd think he have something better to offer for your soul than FERMENTED MILK" *turns to andy for affirmation*
>andy: "sure yeah. you'd want something more in exchange"
> "I mean if I were a teenage girl in the middle ages, Conan, if I were a young... budding...naked teenage girl in the middle ages I'd ask for something a little more luxurious you know..."
>audience growing uncomfortable
>conan making the *cut* gesture to the camera crew
>norm turns to Andy again
>"I'd ask for a HOT FRICKING TWINK to frick me in my tight VIRGIN QUIM"
Well done. I read it hearing their voices.
Well done, anon. Well done.
How many times are you going to respond to yourself?
>nah it was just the devil
Up until this point your norm wasn’t coming across strong but that line made his voice appear.
I miss norm so much
Damn it
She needed to get naked more.
She was underage, so...
She was 18 in 2015, so no, moron.
She was 17, and more importantly she was depicting a much younger girl.
>April 16, 1996
>in 2015 = 19
So I was a year off but still not underage. Be an autistic homosexual somewhere else.
The character she is portraying is no older than 14.
Yeah, I guess that site can't do basic math either. 2015-1996 = 19
And I don't give a frick how older her character is suppose to be LARPing idiot.
The film was filmed before it was released. You are asking to see a 17 year old nude while she is depicting a 14 year old. Unironically get help.
Prove it.
I just did.
No, you didn't. Some random site saying so doesn't mean it was filmed years before it was released. Pre production started in 2013 when she was 17, but nothing says it was filmed then. It's a very minimalist film so it was probably filmed the year after still making her 18.
In any case she is perfectly of age and there is nothing wrong with wanted to see her naked in a movie, regardless of her "characters" age, which doesn't matter. You are a gay.
>they must have released within 24 hours of filming
moron
Not what I said. Try harder, moron.
Your whole thing is you get called out for pedophilia and now you're mad, so miss with me that shit bubo
>18
>pedophilia
moron.
>17
>portrayed as 14
Pedophile
>17
Prove it. I already explained nothing says the film was shot in 2013, only that the reproduction started. So she was at the most 18, not 17.
>portrayed as 14
LARP.
Already explained it to you. Keep digging that grave for yourself. Why is it that depictions of 14 year olds being naked or sexual is so important to you?
No, you didn't, you just keep LARPing that her characters age is more important than her real age, which wasn't 17. You are a projecting pedophile.
You want to see 14 year olds fricking goats, not me dumbass
Strawman. Don't you have some CP to dump in Discord, freak?
You can't defend yourself and now you're projecting. I accept your concession, don't sexualize here again
Now you're just pathetically mirroring what I said. You can't even come up with your own retorts now. lol
You're a pedophile, period
You're on your period and should frick off to the kitchen, bawd.
Is that why you're a pedophile, women your own age recognize what a piece of shit you are and yiu think younger ones won't?
Stop seething because people find an attractive woman attractive, you creep
Her fault for doing the movie.
OH NO NO NO NO. Call the FCC! I'm shaking rn a 17 yo woman can't possibly be naked on a movie!!!!
Also, you're factually wrong about her age as well: she started filming at the exact day she turned 18.
You ever ask yourself why you think its okay to oogle women (girls really) who are literally on the edge of legality?
Do you ever ask yourself why you seethe so much about women's beauty? Are you hideous? Are you post-wall? Are you envious? Are you overcompensating/repressing something you think you're unable to control?
Anyway, do you realize you're the one that sounds unhinged whereas other people seem normal rather than hypocritical?
I just think its weird you basically admit you'd go even younger if you could, that's all.
You'd be better off investigating the true source of your weird, overinvested puritan obsession.
A desire to protect children from obese predators.
You can do that elsewhere. Nobody here wants to rape little kids. Now, a perfectly nubile wench of 17 years and say 362 days? Why, the scandal alone gets me turgid
It was released in 2015 moron. The filming started much earlier
So was it really her naked ass or was it a booty double?
I would hope a body double given her age. There was really no reason not just obscure it in shadow to begin with.
homosexual
>19
>underage
Yes, 19 is not underage, thanks for agreeing with me.
19 is not directly underage but it's very clear that when someone goes for that they're basically saying "I'd go younger if I could" which is obviously pedo adjacent. And it doesn't matter because she was 17 and her character was 14.
>19 is not directly underage but it's very clear that when someone goes for that they're basically saying "I'd go younger if I could" which is obviously pedo adjacent.
I guess that's you abusing "copium" so you don't have to confront reality
Yeah, heh, all those pedophiles who go after 19 and older women. That's totally reality and not your moronic pea brain going haywire.
Normal men don't want women barely out of (or still in) a high school. You're obese and a piece of shit and you know women in your age group won't have you so you try to find girls (not women) who you think are young and naive and won't see through you. If you're not a pedophile (and you probably are) you're on the pedophile assembly line. What happens when it turns out a 19 year old GIRL isn't naive enough to fall for your bullshit because you're an obese sack of shit? Exactly, you would go even lower, and you basically already have because your first thought for this thread was how much you wish a 14 year old character was naked for you to leer at.
>In Robert Eggers' script, Caleb is noted as being 11 years old. The script also notes that the twins are 5 years old, and Thomasin is 13 (though she appears to be 18 in the final film).
Ah, I'm such an evil pedo for wanting to look at a fully consenting adult female. How awful. She wasn't underage in the movie and she wasn't IRL. Quit your LARPing crusade, you stupid homosexual.
A seventeen year old playing a thirteen year old, tells me and any reasonable person all we need to know. This entire thread has been you getting called out, trying to cope or stammer out an explanation, making a fool of yourself, and then you try again. You're exactly what I described. Work on yourself and maybe women your own age won't send your goofy ass packing.
>A seventeen year old playing a thirteen year old, tells me and any reasonable person all we need to know.
You keep saying this while providing no proof, when I have, proving she wasn't 17 but 18 and also 18 according to the director in regards to her character. If you had any evidence you would've posted it by now but don't and can't. You are clearly a buttmad closeted pedophile who can't own up to the fact you have a problem and insist on finding one in this thread. Pure projection.
I provided proof, you ignored it because you'd rather pretend she is eighteen so you can maintain the idea that you aren't a pedophile, totally ignoring that she's portraying a fourteen year old and totally ignoring the implications of you chasing the youngest legally possible (indicating you'd go lower if you could) so you can pretend you aren't exactly what I and everyone else can see you are
>I provided proof,
No, you didn't. But I'll post mine again since you are one stubborn homosexual.
>In Robert Eggers' script, Caleb is noted as being 11 years old. The script also notes that the twins are 5 years old, and Thomasin is 13 (though she appears to be 18 in the final film).
https://creepycatalog.com/the-vvitch-explained-analysis-the-witch/
She is 18 according to the final draft of the script, placing the films shooting to be around 2014 when Anya was indeed 18-years-old and not 17. So she is not depicting a 13 year old. You said 14 though because I know you can't even get your bullshit arguments straight and are trying so hard at this point to get anything to stick. The latest production note on the Wikipedia page says:
>In December 2013, costume designer Linda Muir joined the crew, and consulted 35 books in the Clothes of the Common People in Elizabethan and Early Stuart England series to plan the costumes, which were made with wool, linen, and hemp. She also lobbied for a larger costume budget.[21]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Witch_(2015_film)
And this backs up what the director had in mind changing her character to be 18 because she is being played by an 18-year-old. When the film came out in February Anya was still 18 years old. So, I'm not pretending she is 18 at all, she was in fact 18 and so was her character.
All you have is your weirdo assumptions and projections, because you are desperately trying to prove you aren't a closeted pedophile at heart. "Oh, yeah, guys who want to see an 18 year old naked are pedos!! Not like me though am I right fellow AOC enjoyers?" You really need to frick off to whatever hole you crawled out from under and stay there, freak.
Appears to be doesn't mean is, she is seventeen as proven by my screenshot and she is portraying a thirteen year old. Yes, I originally said fourteen, her being even younger than that doesn't exactly help your case. You're sexualizing a girl who is as young as legally possible and so young looking she passes for much younger than that, that's the fact.
>Appears to be doesn't mean is,
She was 18 when they filmed the movie and is playing an 18 year old.
>she is seventeen as proven by my screenshot
Ah yes, your sourceless screenshot probably from some gay gossip website. How accurate.
>and she is portraying a thirteen year old.
She isn't, we went over this.
>You're sexualizing a girl who is as young as legally possible
"Oh my god, not a legal female!! NOOOOO!!" - you, the closeted pedophile
Dude just does not want to admit liking a woman who is 18 is perfectly normal. Closeted pedo or a homosexual, probably both.
You're going in circles and losing the argument on every loop. I'll say it again: you target girls who are as young as possible, hoping to pray on inexperience and vulnerability, hoping they're too naive to see what women your own age see. That's the root cause of it, and the RESULT is you seriously trying to argue that it's okay that you want to see a character naked who is a much younger teen.
>You're going in circles and losing the argument on every loop.
Now you're just mirroring my responses to you like you did before. You have no sources or credible evidence otherwise you would've posted it already. You are really going to die on a hill because someone said they wanted to see an 18 year old playing an 18 year old naked. You have problems lol.
Go talk about how "normal" it is that you want to see a girl as young as legal naked while portraying a girl younger than that, see who ends up "dying on a hill" then. You've spent so much time on this shitty website it has warped your perception of right and wrong.
>while portraying a girl younger than that,
She was portraying an 18 year old because she was 18, I have already proved that was the intention the director had in mind when casting her. You really need to stop projecting your sick fantasies on to sane people.
It obviously wasn't. You're running from your own position.
>It obviously wasn't.
Prove it. If he wanted a 13 year old, he would have casted one or someone a year or two older, not an 18 year old. Your only point is just your opinion: "but she looks young enough to be 13!" So now you're saying it's wrong to like women even if they are 18 or older who look young. You are either a closeted pedophile, a homosexual, or a woman. All of which do not belong here.
She was clearly not a woman in the film, and your own ridiculous green text supported that.
>She was clearly not a woman in the film,
An 18 year old is an adult female, and she was playing an 18 year old, despite the original scripts intentions. You have ran out of arguments and are falling back on the "but she looks young!" cope.
This is a meme argument that would apply to every person attracted to any age.
The reality is normal people are biologically wired to be attracted to other humans of the opposite sex with fully developed sexual characteristics. The age of consent being 18 in some areas is a relatively trivial invention of society. In fact the time period in which this film takes place would have likely had an age of consent around 10 to 14. No one would have made a comment about it had she been married. To pretend some moral higher-end by repeating the position of the laws of the day, and then comparing someone who found her attractive to someone who finds pre-pubescent children attractive isn't moral or logical.
every pedo has the same justifications
I don't think troomers are carry handle enjoyers
That’s her fricking problem isn’t it. She had a pretty thicc dumper ass on her for a 17yo so maybe she shouldn’t have?
Black Phillip mounting her from behind near the end scene
A longer scene showing the reasons for the family's exile might have made the ensuing drama more impactful.
Also ATJ masturbation scene would have been cool.
Didn't the father just consider himself more devout than the town?
For me it's Asian anya
Name? Also looks like Bjork
clear indication that it was all hallucination/religious psychosis. It's too moronic at face value. Btw, what the frick is wrong with the captchas recently?
One involving a coven of BBW vvitches
There were no fat people back then
Ah, so that's why Satan tempts them with butter.
The true face of Satan.
>Suave
>Gluttony-promoting
>Irish
Checks out
>bargains with Goat Man for Twin's lives instead of just joining that twerk coven for free after getting her family murdered
>Twins show up in town, Black Phillip's one of the Elders sat on the council suggested by him whispering into the twins' ear as the closing shot
>town sends posse for a punitive raid on natives blamed for the slaughter at the house
More supernatural material. Thomasin can't just let what happened slide and without that there's no justification for showing baby abduction and rendering into broom butter.
I watched it, couldn’t have been younger than 19 but my memory is so blurry it feels like I was 12. We were looking forward to a classic horror movie and it was a fricking snoozefest. So, is there enough under the surface to watch it again with different expectations?
In one of the trailers there was a scene of Thomasin milking some doe and blood comes out. Well, for some reason I didn't perceive it as red and thus as blood, instead I thought it was semen and the shocked reaction she gave was warranted, it kinda provided me with utmost curiosity as to find out what kind of scenarios she encountered as to why she confused a buck for a doe, or the witchery of transmogrifying one into another.
Imagine my utterly disappointment after not finding a single goat handjob, one to completion at that, in the final movie
So that
Damn that sounds rough, i'm sorry Anon
Who cares for a A24 OST.
One of the many scenes of OP sucking wiener
Imagine no bug spray and no bug nets. Imagine getting eaten alive by mosquitoes and ticks. Yikes. There's a scene where they're kneeling and holding hands up staring off into nature, you can see mosquitoes swarming. Frick.
Will you guys shut the frick up.
you bunch of morons made me look and first thing i find is costume designer joined in december 2013 so anya was deffo 18
but it dosen't fricking matter beacuse it was filmed in ontario frick uou morons die Black person
Full blown incest scene.
She fricks her brother after he gets abducted by the witch.
imagine combining your dna with that dna and producing a baby
haha imagine
>all this seething about anya's character being underage
>not one picture of actual underage anya
fricking plebs kek, least the norm post was funny
frick off
No
That was a body double, sadly
Has it ever been confirmed? She showed her ass in that northbloke movie and it was fairly round.
It really wasn't round at all kek. She was sticcmode by then. Said body double was on the credits. I'd like to be wrong about this but I'm im 99% sure i am not
Peak anya
>said body double
Name?
Fricking hell look at her
Anya Taylor Joy eating obscene amounts of butter and swelling to 300 lbs.
More scenes with the witch and the shota.
Full nude incest scene with her brother.
anya fingering herself to completion
Puritan women probably don't jerk off or even know its a thing you can do.
i didn't know what masturbation was before i did it
usually someone older tells you
Ofc nude Anya scenes so as to highlight the daily temptation that she caused in that isolated family setting
get help
No, you do. Your weirdo puritanism has become self-denying, hypocritical mental illness-- the same type of fringe behavior that doomed the family shown in the movie.
Your imagining things. You know what creeps out parents? You hanging around outside the high school waiting for them to turn 18.
Your "desire to protect" comes across as extremely creepy to most parents. Stay away from those want to "protect" and go get therapy or something
Sodomy would have to be involved.
A 17 year old girl is literally an adult woman at her peak, and pedophiles like girls 12 and under, it makes no sense to call someone that likes a 17 yo a pedophile
You sick frick you probably jerked to that 35 year old mexican in mid90's that played a 13 year old in the movie
First, seventeen is underage. Second, when someone who isn't a teenager themselves shows an interest in teenagers, legal or not, it's a clear sign that only the law stays their hand, if they could get away with fourteen, they would. Sexualizing someone who was in high school a few days ago isn't something normal men do, it's a coping mechanism for men facing rejection, they think younger and more naive girls won't be so unimpressed with their obese gut and their poverty.
>seventeen is underage.
Kek
Go away you and either take your PMS medicine or work out your issues as suggested above. Your sweaty-brow extrapolation about "fourteen" and whatnot is 100% projection
Yes actually, seventeen is underage, and you ignored the rest of my point and we both know why.
>Sexualizing someone who was in high school a few days ago isn't something normal men do
why is 16 the age of consent for over half the US?
Old, out of date laws pushed for and protected by the scum like you see here
there was no way that was her ass
Added? Like everything else Eggers has done, only twenty fricking minutes of the movie are worth seeing. How about cut out all the shit, and post your SHORT on YouTube.
The way she got over her kid brother's death in moments, openly joined the people who killed him, etc. always rubbed me the wrong way.
My ideals were always egalitarian, but modern women's liberation seems to be a cover for marketing sociopathy.
Lmao, I'm sorry you Anya fans have got an autistic troony infestation shitting up your thread. I'm glad my waifu's threads usually go better than this
what the frick?
Jesus. Does she have a little sister?
Her siblings are all older and she doesn’t have kids, so how is there a miniature Anya?
Also why do so many female celebrities have younger lookalikes? Cloning?
Lumberjack comes from the village and brutally maims, dismembers and kills her in the forest in such a way that the trees are painted red.
That's what I would use added anyways.
no body double, full frontal
she was underage, so no comment