>Star Trek: Celebrations will shine a light on the franchise's most "badass" LGBTQIA+ characters, featuring stories by top LGBTQIA+ creators.
>The one-shot celebrates Trek's commitment to diversity and inclusion, honoring characters like Culber, Stamets, Mariner, and Seven of Nine.
https://screenrant.com/star-trek-celebrations-pride-comic-lgbtqia-characters/
Is this franchise just a propaganda mouthpiece at this point?
Fanbase demographics change over time. They are just giving their fans stuff they like. Who'd guess that gays would like seeing themselves in a utopian society?? Also yes Star Trek is individualist propaganda. always has been
Can't tell is bait or genuinely moronic person. Also this is a naked grab for ESG interest-free loans. There must be hundreds of hours of slop produced over the past 4 years nobody will ever watch or think about. It's a Brave New World scheme of producing for production sake.
Maybe theyve had gay characters but you are moronic
Sulu isn't gay, he's just zesty.
George Takei is gayer than gay though.
OT Sulu was if anything a bit of a lady's man but he was made gay in the reboot. Takei was initially against this because he understood the difference between an actor and a character but he soon backed down before the mob.
>this is a naked grab for ESG interest-free loans
Yes. And I think OP knows this, too. So the whole thread is pointless.
More people in the real world identify as gay than ever before. Individualism is on the rise. Star Trek has always been a progressive and individualistic show. Are you so arrogant to think that because you will never watch something that no one will ever watch it?
gays and trannies don't watch Star Trek. Putting a queer-o character in here and there ain't changing that. All it does is further alienate its dwindling fanbase.
>All it does is further alienate its dwindling fanbase.
Good, maybe this time they would finally put the franchise to rest.
You act like pivoting to a primarily homosexual customer base is bad business.
Paramount stock is down ~80% since NuTrek started...
I don't care about line going up. I just want to someone out ST to rest and new IPs being created.
Tell that to everyone that is into Kirk/Spock.
they do though. youre just wrong here.
Star Trek the favourite show of females, homosexuals and third world minorities
I'm a third word minority and i don't give 2 shits about star trek nor my 3rd world friends.
Star trek is a show exclusively for american nerds just like your sports, no one outside US cares about.
it's true. star trek is just usa imperial masturbation.
The majority of those people are kids who've been indoctrinated because they are all under 18.
Man, that's weird, because there's way more straight indoctrination. Are you guys just really bad at it?
>straight indoctrination
>because there's way more straight indoctrination. Are you guys just really bad at it?
I can't speak for all of us, but
seems remarkably bad at it given his complete failure of a (straight) love life
Mental Illness is also on the rise. Maybe homosexuality is a mental illness after all.
>more people follow thing
>individualism is on the rise
Kek
Just an FYI; homosexuality is inorganic and is brought on by a number of factors, in the end though it has to be consciously chosen as a lifestyle and identity. This is despite the fact that it is a preference and not an identity. Desiring to have sex with someone of the same sex is not an identity. All the “homosexual traits and characteristics” are just really the neuroses which drove the person to reject heterosexuality.
Sexual identity politics are cancer and people who fall into the trap are the best useful idiots. Homosexuality has no redeeming features or societal value and should not be a focus in media. It is only promoted in media as an understanding that homosexuals are easily manageable and manipulated.
Star Trek has always been woke, and the federal reserve cartel has always given preferential treatment to politically favored companies
>Star Trek has always been woke,
nope
nope
>we were always at war with eastasia
>Star Trek was always woke
Yep.
Clearly nope, unless (as usual) you are willing to stretch the meaning of the word beyond recognition
>having no standards, no meritocracy, no equal opportunities is good
>accepting every kind of shit with no critical thingùking or standard, including mental illness is good.
Even if your smal loudl group distorts words, substance doesn't change.
progressive is to woke what moderate spirituality is to religious fanaticism, therefore Star Trek was never woke
Deal with it. If it was always woke, normal people would still watch it
What are those even pics supposed to mean?
>good looking well groomed people?
>aliens?
>wake up and the thread's still going
>lefties are still pretending progressive then = progressive now
>and ignoring the lack of talent/care shown by the creators today
>and ignoring the actual evidence of how "problematic" (for them) Star Trek used to be: https://youtu.be/52q2zlv-kBk
This guy gets it:
Literally meds
And if I took them, facts would become all slippery and inconsequential as they are for you? Makes sense.
Seems like an admission that only meds can make this shit seem normal.
But LGBT are only a few percent of the population.
True, but a disproportionately large amount of LGBT people are autistic, and almost 100% of the Star Trek fanbase are on the spectrum, so naturally there’s a big overlap between those two groups
Except the Star Trek fanbase don't watch nuTrek
Star Trek is not individualistic at all, it's literally about a military organization.
>Fanbase demographics change over time.
They really don't tho, look at the market research. ESG dollars is driving this.
>They are just giving their fans stuff they like.
lol
>Who'd guess that gays would like seeing themselves in a utopian society??
>Star Trek is individualist propaganda.
You're arguing Star Trek panders to a group identity...
...then claim it's always been about individualism?
lolwut?
which is it?
it can't be both
stop trying to reason with normies. they're all schizo consoomers who talk in circles without ever coming to any conclusion other than you're just bad because you think bad things are bad
>Seven of Nine
>LGBTABCDEFG+
Borg is part of the plus.
She’s human and straight. The show is where she reclaims her humanity and individuality, if they watched it.
In the Pisscard show they made her a lesbian for some reason.
Senile Picard wandering into a holodeck isn't canon.
once you go chakotay your only path forward is to go gay
>Seven of Nine
>Poly of Poly
They retconned her into being a dyke in Hispanic but it's funny they didn't use a character who was always bisexual (Jadzia) for their troony shit. Maybe because they can't stomach to have any original Star Trek character on their poster, it all has to be their characters or their subversions
The whole purpose is to corrupt preexisting characters. Seven of Nine was a perfect target because she was THE Star Trek male lust fantasy. So they corrupted her.
Joke is on them since I found Seven's attractiveness rather presumptuous and in my face and I much preferred B'Elanna. Seven's appeal to me was her deep character and her contentious relationship with Janeway, too bad they raped that too.
lmao i just realized it's even JJ sulu not george takei who is an ACTUAL homosexual IRL
that's because even Takei went on record saying Sulu wasn't gay, so paramount had to weedle around and make it so Kelvin Timeline Sulu is gay but regular Sulu isn't
it was pretty cool of takei to tell the truth about sulu
What’s going on??
People are no longer the target audience for media. The target audience for media is now, exclusively, blackrock. The best part is blackrock has no capacity to judge a piece of media beyond its checklist of requirements.
Did anything change?
Star Trek always came across as a celebration of all that kind of horrible shit to me but then I never watched much of it.
despite roddenberry's wishes star trek has never been anything except heterosexual
Thankfully, Based Big Mike McMahan's wishes are for everyone to be baseline bisexual; or, in the language of the ancient Thumbelonians, ambi-sextrous.
Ah-ha! It's so nice of them to take a picture with the fan suffering from Down's syndrome!
If you were offered a Faustian bargain to be a successful multimillionaire with a loving family and an artistic creation beloved by many, but the cost was you'd look like a thumb, you'd take it in a heartbeat. I'm glad I did. Suck it Waltke.
That disgusting fat slob not only turned Star Trek into a joke but also contributed to the downfall of a 100 year old movie company. With his other show canceled, his fifteen minutes are rapidly coming to an end.
>With his other show canceled,
Solar Opposites just released a Valentine's Day special. Check it out, only on the 'lu.
>just released a Valentine's Day special
Oh really!? Let me just check the trailer real quick...
Big yikes! Looks like people just don't care for your slop when there's no Roiland involved. Oh well!
>checking a trailer on YouTube
Who the hell does that? It just shows up on the Hulu homepage and people click it. Who browses YouTube for trailers for things when they can spend just as much effort seeing the thing itself? You stupid or something? Not even Waltke is this dumb, and that mother fricker got kicked out of 109 T-shirts.
>a successful multimillionaire
You're about to get fired, I hope your expenses are reasonable
>a loving family
I'm fricking Mrs. McMahan
>artistic creation beloved by many
Only your own employees, Mike
I want to put my head on Noel's belly. It's not fair bros.
"Star Trek" is currently in its death throes with Paramount Plus. It's been an abject faiilure which is part of why, as Paramount's flagship show, the entire company is being courted by multiple buyers. You can expect them to gut these IPs and fire everyone currently failing them, however, so none of this shit will be continued nor will it be considered canon
im not so sure about that. if they trick comcast into dragging P+ along with peawiener then paramount may be able to afford to keep producing its shitty shit tv shows
>A joint Paramount/Comcast streaming service would likely cut back on total content spending between the two, which could impact future seasons, TV movies and series currently being considered. However, it could also breathe new life into a streaming service that has struggled to turn a profit and is at risk of being shuttered, especially following a potential buyout of Paramount Global.
Star Treks central idea that the earth will form a united fascist interracial government with no gender roles and everybody will have everything they ever wanted but for some reason venture out into dangerous space looking to get vaporized by english speaking aliens with face prostetics is just an absurd futurist fantasy nobody can even pretend to identify with anymore. Society changed a lot after the 20th century, exploration and colonization are now supposed to be bad even when done by a diversity crew.
Star Trek's humanity was baptized by nuclear fire.
Future humans are supposed to be much more mature than us, to a point of being unrecognizable. NuTrek doesn't understand because everyone talks like a dumbass millennial.
>Society changed a lot after the 20th century, exploration and colonization are now supposed to be bad even when done by a diversity crew.
But that's what the ruling elite of the 21st century is.
Star Trek's humanity figured the best way to stop climate change was to genocide all the thirdies manning the pollution-spewing factories and their clients, pin the blame on some random eco-terrorist who apparently held the rank of colonel, and hope nobody asks too many questions as they reset society to something with a better-engineered foundation.
i miss when star trek was about gene roddenberry's delicious little girls and their panties
>most "badass" LGBTQIA+ characters
Are there ones that are considered not badass?
nuchapel is a dyke?
No. She's got the hots for Spock
She bi in the show, Spock is just her latest crush
APOLOGIZE
>What the FRICK happened to Star Trek?
They stopped catering to nerds and instead started catering to gays. Star Trek used to be about the possibilities that existed beyond our own solar system. What and who would we find out there. Would they be like us? Would they hold the same values or be in opposition? Could we work together for the betterment of everyone? It was exciting to see the possibilities
Now its changed. It seems none of the old guard are around to see that original idea being put forth. Instead of looking outward to what could be they instead want to focus on using Star Trek as a setting to push contemporary "causes" and "activism"
Who cares about weird aliens and confrontation that arises from contact with them, lets focus on making everyone gay seems to be the goal
>Star Trek used to be about the possibilities that existed beyond our own solar system. What and who would we find out there. Would they be like us? Would they hold the same values or be in opposition? Could we work together for the betterment of everyone? It was exciting to see the possibilities
The cognitive dissonance in your post is risible. You can't even find common ground with rump rangers and work together to the betterment of everyone. An alien would break you.
Star Trek had the first interracial kiss on television moron
progressive is progressive, woke is woke
ST was never woke
>This accepting everyone is different than that accepting everyone!
Just because your team is using a new word for it doesn't change anything. Star Trek was always woke.
>They stopped catering to nerds and instead started catering to gays.
nerds ARE gays now. parts of nerd culture went mainstream in the 2000s and what was left of it was subsumed by gay culture. it no longer exists.
Left wingers are hypocrites and shit heads
You obviously didn't watch TNG or any Star trek related shows if you have a problem with diversity and representation.
Based Star Trek enjoyer. You are better than a thousand shills
literally no blacks whine about being black in star trek
NB4 "that doesn't c-c-count!"
Historically since Day 1 Trek fans have been massive fricking morons. These people unironically believe communism will make Star Trek happen irl
Looks like Consider Phlebas wasn't cancelled after all.
Borza Did Nothing Wrong
What part of fully automated luxury gay space communism do you not understand?
You know, when I see a white man dress like that it just reminds me of the ancient south European tunic fashion (trousers were worn by Gauls and others in the cooler central/north Europe). It's only when someone from one of the effeminate races wears it that it really starts looking gay
>6000 years into the future
>still no cure for Homos
Kind of seems unlikely
Are we the baddies?
>Armin Meiwes is a German former computer repair technician who received international attention for murdering and eating a voluntary victim
>Meiwes then ran Brandes a bath, before going to read a Star Trek book
Why are trekkies so sick?
You're the sick one for being aware of this filth and then posting about it. Get help
>you heard about some public information
>get help
You're mentally ill
That is some extremely specific information about a horrific topic that you took the trouble of looking up and then posted here, like we're the sickos studying gay canninbals
like you've never played "did it happen in germany or florida"
I miss that so much.
You're making assumptions because you have a low IQ. Both pieces of information I found out about passively. Get tested!
Eh Chapel wants to frick Spock to death what are they on about?
The character on the show is bisexual and the actress playing her describes herself as queer
Star Trek is about truth and equality, not propaganda and reverse-racism. Therefore Star Trek is not ~~*woke*~~.
>Is this franchise just a propaganda mouthpiece at this point?
This is the franchise with the first interracial kiss on screen, you mouth breathing moron
It was always propaganda garbage with a thin sci fi veneer
>the first interracial kiss on screen
Not true.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_interracial_kiss_on_television
You're correct, but it was still a big deal at the time.
>It was always propaganda garbage with a thin sci fi veneer
There was always a propaganda element, but TOS and the Berman-era series set out to entertain, first and foremost, and - while the quality varied - featured the work of some talented writers who cared about their craft. Nu Trek is as you describe. Also, the anti-straight/white/male/Christian/anything-to-the-right-of-Justin-Trudeau-ness is new:
I’m so happy I’ve never seen a single episode or movie of this Star Trek garbage.
The last season of Picard retconned again that 7 is not a lesbian.
jews not kept in check
Star Trek was always woke.
t. person who couldn't even get the most obvious fricking parable
Trek was always woke, kiddo.
yet kirk has practically been decanonized for being too problematic
>Star Trek was always woke but the old stuff is problematic
None of that is real Star Trek, that ended with Enterprise.
Based Dukat.
Not going to lie, you give me a Star Trek show that’s just Dukat and Garak early years of the obsidian order, climbing ranks and fricking with each other, I would buy a Paramount+ subscription just for it. Bonus points if it’s the original actors deaged, or animated with them providing the voices.
do I like TNG or DS9 more? on the one hand, I absolutely love Picard. but on the other hand I like the story and setting of DS9 more - the politics, the Cardassians, etc.
DS9 is overall better, even though TNG is great too.
>DS9 is overall better
For me I love the world and atmosphere of TNG more. The Enterprise is just too comfy and they truly "boldly go." Meanwhile on DS9, Bajorans can be too annoying sometimes, and they don't boldly go.
But nothing in TNG beats the Cardassians or the Dominion, so I'll give that to DS9. Idk, I love both.
Objectively DS9 might be better, but TNG is peak comfy for me, probably just because it's the one I saw most growing up.
Theoretically, that sounds fricking amazing. But it would require witty and non-woke writing, so...
Both are based. TNG raised the standards of storytelling for the franchise and codified a lot of lore and methodology for what came after. DS9 is a deconstruction done right, mainly because it took plenty of time to examine what Starfleet is like when under attack and how well it can hold onto its utopian ideals, mainly by humanizing the cast and giving them plenty of shortcomings but also inspirational and heroic moments.
Correct
Tol boldly go backwards and forget our common humanity and single out members of our species for their skin colour and sexual prefences. Powerful.
>beloved show has diversity
>suddenly the franchise becomes entirely devoted to that
There was always a significant Queer segment of Fandom even back in the TOS days. There was Kirk Spock slash in the Dealer's Room at even the earliest conventions.
However, Trek didn't go openly Queer until Star Trek: The Next Generation in the late 80s, and that carried over into the other series of that era. Probably why Queer fans who were teens and young adults back then fixate on those shows.
HTH
>Advertise Star Trek gayness with Garak, a man who LITERALLY had a girlfriend and banged Mirror Kira
k... why not, say, Jadzia who was openly bisexual and was the first (?) to have a gay kiss scene with Moira from Arrow? Or Riker swapping spit with that agender alien?
Because gays associate certain things with being gay. A somewhat flamboyant tailor who is evasive and guarded about his past seems to them like someone who would be gay. Dude is a fricking former spy and assassin for arguably the most deadly agency within Cardassia and they think he's just a twink
All because he was a little handsy with Julian in ONE (1) episode when they first meet and it's obviously done in a way to make Julian uncomfortable and to drop his guard to be more malleable for Garak. They never do anything like that again but that one episode was enough to tarnish Plain, Simple Garak's identity. Shame
> Just one episode!!!
Just one episode with Garak being handsy. Yeah there's a few Star Trek episodes in general that deal with sexual identity and homosexuality, I imagine this post is talking about The Outcast, which had nothing to do with Garak and I believe predated Garak...
>According to both Robinson and producer/showrunner Ira Behr, Garak was a gay character.
cool, wasn't in the show, headcanon objectively. And even if that were the case that it was an "underlying" trait it doesn't change the fact that he objectively had sex with women, so he's at least bi.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beard_(companion)
>he's at least bi!!!
Anon, you have the agency to decide what level and kind of Queerness you're comfortable with. But insisting "it's not gay unless the balls touch" is very Old School.
Robinsons been too long in Pleasure Hell to be accountable
>Ira Behr
Is he the guy who sabotaged Gul Dukat's character arc because people were growing to like the character too much?
He's also the guy who killed Tom Riker.
Ira Behr is a good writer who is responsible for a lot of what made DS9 great, but he also needs to shut the frick up once in a while because the guy lives to agitate people.
Didn't happen onscreen, wasn't even convincingly hinted at. Actual Garak from the show would probably support putting Cardassian gays in the airlock
>wasn't even convincingly hinted at
Yeah dude, he's just a fashion designer.
>He's gay because his cover was working as a tailor
Yeah no. Your insistence on this makes it clear that you are gay yourself however
Spies can't be gay?
wheres jadzia dax?
Dead
Too hot, we can't have that.
Jadzia Dax is not gay.
Dax had two lesbian kisses in the show, i think that counts.
Alive characters only
imagine mirror Jadzia sitting right on your face
>Is this franchise just a propaganda mouthpiece at this point?
Kurtzman Trek is pure agitprop.
They even had that obese black woman from the DNC as a cameo in one of the episodes of STD.
"protecting the Klingon identity as a species"
I remember the good old days when barbarous imperialist Mongolian LARPers didn't need their "identity" protected
Star Trek was always based.
is this real lmao
Yup
what i think is weird is that they named one of the races NYGeans which sounds close to our favorite brownword, just that they are the "privileged" race in this example. i guess it wouldve been too on the nose
they were pretty blatant with their black analogues. See: The Kazon.
>i guess it wouldve been too on the nose
Like the twinned Bynars or the hibernating Grizzellans?
apparently the full scene goes on to do the full dog and pony show of muh racism, muh socioeconomic
The episode ends showing that the criminal isn't evil because of economic factors but actually just an unrepenting monster.
At the end of the episode Neelix gets redpilled and stops having mercy for the criminal
Kino episode. I felt really bad for the mentally-damaged criminal.
Tom Paris is the quintessential white man of Star Trek (along with Miles O'Brien)
Tony Soprano moment
>nerds have given up on finding a gf and trooned out
Are you surprised?
That’s too many figures. When they’re clustered together like that you don’t respect yourself or the figures.
>posting comic books on Cinemaphile
>Is this franchise just a propaganda mouthpiece at this point?
lol isn't that obvious to everyone by now
>you dirty fricking nyggean
Such an odd episode
And? Did his husband care?
Why would Howard Stern’s husband care?
Damn you
>DS9 is a deconstruction
It is, but it's the only one done right. In the end, it made the Federation better than before.
haha no it isn't you fool
>ancient twitter screencaps
What's his endgame?
>Mary Wiseman
>LGBTQ+
She got so morbidly obese that after she had a kid she "came out" as bisexual in order to keep her job.
>Mary Wiseman
>LGBTQ+
LGBTQ = Let's Get Bigger Than Quasars
>star trek poster
>literally who characters
>no kirk or spock
lmao im glad im not a trekkie
>So Data I've heard that you've been researching pre-unified Earth sexuality recently. Why don't you tell me about your historical discoveries.
>Captain, according to research 92% of children raised by gay parents are abused while 51% experience depression and 72% are obese. Furthermore despite being 1% of the population gays are 33% of child molesters, account for 67% of all aids cases and an overwhelming 78% of them have at least one sexual disease. Their lifespans are 20 years shorter than normal and 28% of gay men have had 200 or more sexual partners. 23% of children who had lesbian mothers have been sexually molested by a parent or other adult. Rape and sexual assault before the age of 16 are strongly correlated with homosexual behavior. Homosexuality is three times more fatal than smoking or obesi-
>Thank you, Mr. Data. That's enough.
Never watched a single Star Trek episode
Hasn't Star Trek always been leftwing utopia pseudointellectual-wank where humanity solves all its problems by speaking and understanding alien cultures? It had a black lady as a major character in the 70s, Star Trek is THE woke show and you are a moron for suddenly realizing and complaining in 2024.
>Hasn't Star Trek always been leftwing utopia pseudointellectual-wank where humanity solves all its problems by speaking and understanding alien cultures?
No, not really. In fact much of early TNG involves Picard trying to bend the rules of Starfleet so he doesn't have to deal with random ayys' problems more than it takes to catalogue their position for some other shmuck to deal with.
The idea of Star Trek being luxury gay space communism mostly comes from its creators ramblings of what he wanted to do off-screen only to be reigned in by the rest of his team because his idea in their unrefined state make no logical sense.
>Never watched a single Star Trek episode
>Star Trek is THE woke show
See
downvoted
Aww. What did you object to: what TOS was actually like, or someone pointing out what TOS was actually like?
>978 subscribers
WOW, THAT'S THE DEFINITIVE SOURCE FOR STAR TREK FACTS.
It's a selection of clips from the show, anon. What exactly are you disputing?
"Woke" is the Poochie of political sermonizing. A good writer could sell a point of view to the most jaded audience, as routinely happened in ST's past. Woke is forcing someone to hear your inept sermon after you paid for the soup.
>it's woke when I personally don't like it
Gotcha.
Reading comprehension too much for your tiny brain? I'm saying it's "Woke" when you suck at writing and you think you've obtained a captive audience.
>it's woke when I don't like it, me me me me mine mine mine mine now now now now!
Gotcha.
Did you just have a seizure?
The hyper queering of Star Trek reminds me of what's happened with Dnd as well, among others. Nerd communities seem to be uniquely susceptible to being easily overrun and coopted by gays and women, but I haven't figured out why yet.
You have to love the double standard prejudice. He was a tailor btw.
I wonder why the esl always copycats that image? You know, that Star Trek episode with Picard and Data.
"Let me ask you a question. When Garack was suckin' him off-"
"Wait, it was the other way around."
"What?!?"
"Julian was...blowing the tailor."
"SON OF A b***h!"
>Odo, my arch nemesis.
I understand the whole Garak thing, but I always shipped Bashir with O'Brien.
Catching, not pitching?
>once you've had Chakotay, you'll forced to go gay.
>open tab
>check /trek/
>some ESL is copycatting the image from that episode with Picard and Data
>the one where Picard gives an impassioned speech about how "this courtroom is a crucible, in which everything irrelevant is burned away, leaving only the truth. For today, we finally understand the Measure of a Man... and it is about tree fiddy."
>powerful words from a better time
>take that, shills who live in my walls
>close tab
When he was always talking about “greasing” the provisional government” who knew that's what he meant.
What is Picard's favorite piece of music? I'm thinking Badinerie from Bach's orchestral suit no.2 in b minor.
tooting intensifies
>What is Picard's favorite piece of music?
Party Rock Anthem by LMFAO
>tfw you can clearly see that they aren't his hands
Nothing, it already gave us kinos from the past. The modern stuff doesn't count. It's the same story with every well established brand, it gets resurrected for perceived ez viewership money by studio morons and the quality always bombs. See X Files, Star Wars or whatever else as examples.
Star Trek (nerd shit in general) has always appealed primarily to the outcasts and losers. homosexuals, leftists, and geeks have always cavorted in the same antiestablishment circles. It's just that over time, the homosexuals have become the squeakiest wheel. Go look up what nerd/geek culture was all about 30 years ago; it was about hating religion, bashing conservatives/"fascists", obsessing over foreign cultures and alternative lifestyles, and on and on. Nothing changed. Kirk kissing Uhura was the first interracial kiss on television, and was highly radical and far-left for the culture of the time. You can't be a nerd and be right wing at the same time, welcome to reality. Stop obsessing over pop culture and do something useful with your life.
>Kirk kissing Uhura was the first interracial kiss on television
moron
>B-but latinas
When people say 'interracial' they mean black-white.
Star Trek wasn't the first to do that, moron.
On television? You're free to point me to something else.
>nb4 some obscure European shit that nobody ever saw
Try reading the thread, moron.
>white and Asian/half Asian
So, you confirm you are illterate. Understood
Leftoids tend to talk a lot about how inhuman rightoids are, for a group who claim that "people are people".
>didn't actually read it
moron
More moronic than the guy pontificating about Star Trek after saying he's never seen a single episode?
He's the biggest moron here but you don't want to be compared with him
>Movin' with Nancy (1967)
>Hot Summer Night (1959)
>Probation Officer (1959)
>You in Your Small Corner (1962)
>Emergency Ward 10 (1964)
moron
Why are you (You)ing me?
>As there is no agreement on what constitutes a race there is also no general agreement on when the first interracial kiss occurred and a number of claims exist.
Fricking clown world.
To be fair, bigotry is fairly inhuman behavior.
Bigotry has been the norm for thousands of years of human history until you homosexuals were invented a century ago
Humans learn and grow, you stupid animal.
>change is always for the better!
Not even Star Trek, optimistic is it is/was, espouses such simple-minded guff.
Not me.
you don't get to decide what is "bigotry" and what direction "growth" should follow
Nobody did put a crown on your head
And nobody declared you Fuhrer.
>Bigotry has been the norm for thousands of years!!!
Oh, is it thousands of years ago again -- already?
IDIC.
Your argument was that bigotry was inhuman, and therefore abnormal for human behaviour. You were wrong, and are now trying to deflect.
Funny because Lucas is a known lefty and the Star Wars original trilogy is basically 'French resistance of Nazi-occupied France, IN SPAAAACE'.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_interracial_kiss_on_television
You lose, because Asians and Latins don't count. Now apologize for being rude.
they know their audience. the average pedophile just evolved from being just a nerd to also being lgtbbq I guess
>POV: leftoids and rightoids fighting in a thread about a show specifically about finding common ground with those who differ from you
W E W L A D
E
W
L
A
D
>Of all the lads I have encountered in my travels, anon's was the most...wew
:^)
>leftoids: people are people
>rightoids: no, I don't like them
I can't believe they don't get along.
: people are labels and I get to decide about them
: frick off, live and let live
No wonder normal people reject woke facism just lie they rejected religious extremism in the past
>no u
ebin
It wasn't a "no u" tho
ebin
>bad faith summary
What a rousing speech, Picard.
>fans timidly start to return after Picard season 3
>run them off again with this self-congratulatory ESG cringe
Every. Time.
ENT S5 is the only thing that can save this franchise
Oh yeah moronic archer meets aliens
Who take over the ship or abduct a crew man. Archers manages to over come it with team work from gay man and mayonnaise. Or
Aliens do 9/11 and archer starts torturing aliens for fun
The actors are too old. The sad fact is, Star Trek is a dead franchise
Several years ago I attended a book signing by a Black-israeli author, Walter Mosley. He contrasted Star Wars with Star Trek. He praised Trek for it's progressiveness and condemned Wars for being too White. It gave me a weird feeling then and has haunted me throughout this woke plague.
?si=-XhnSxy91bXOl95y
that's pretty gay
>open tab
>check /trek/
>"woke woke woke woke woke woke woke woke woke"
>the ceaseless invocation of this word dilutes it of any semantic meaning
>it becomes a hypnotic chant
>paradoxically lulled to sleep
>forget to close tab
>What the FRICK happened to Star Trek?
homosexuals.
Bolsheviks escaping from Russia.
Star Trek has always been regime propaganda. The problem is the regime has gotten more gay and less skilled so the end result is what you see.
Friendly reminder that there´s no PRO character in OP´s pic. Just saying.
#winning
#sexhaving
#medicated
#moisturized
>#moisturized
Imprescindible.
>boldly go where no man has gone before
>every character is human except for the human with pointy ears
They actually had a cool Aenar character then killed him off, frick why?
>is the show that had the first interracial and first lesbian on screen kiss trying to be WWWOOOKKKKEEEE NOW?!?!?!?!??!
>AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
Meds
>we were always at war with eastasia
Still at it, fanatic?
When I watch Star Trek. I'm not interested which characters have a mental illness, as it adds nothing to the show.
I'm a gay and I love Star Trek. But only DS9 and Voy.
Star Trek was always woke.
>white man kissing biological woman
Yeah that's not woke
it was at the time
>stretch and distort the meaning of woke so much it actually encompass everything ever made
kek, no. Never been woke
>how dare the franchise whose fanbase literally invented slashfic feature LGBT stuff
way to expose yourself as a fraud op
>No Garak
What the FRICK did they mean by this?
Propaganda in the 60s
>set aside your differences, work together for the betterment of everyone
Propaganda today
>focus on your differences, get yours, disregard everyone else
>focus on your differences, get yours, disregard everyone else
and what is an example of this in modern Trek?
its the foundation of michael burnham's entire character.
Then why does she work well with her crew, Saru and Linus and the cyborg chick and homosexual doctors and landwhale Tilly? All of them are different and yet share one mission: to seek out and explore
>they are ugly, mentally ill and lgbt. In space.
Woke shit doesn't work at all.
Cry more
This is moving a goalpost. No one is highlighting differences and "getting theirs" per
. You just don't like NuTrek because you can't fap to it, and make stupid excuses about wokeness and differences because of coomer brain.
> No one is highlighting differences
meanwhile…
>meanwhile…
Unless that guy is a Trek writer, it only impugns that poster and not the Trek writers for "highligting differences"
Look, you wanna say Discovery is badly written and poorly acted by ugly people, no one is going to argue; but to claim that the message of compromise and understanding has somehow been subverted because they got a bunch of uggos from community theater together just doesn't hold water
This is a bunch of mental gymnastics to excuse the reason for filming a man in a dress.
If the purpose of that shot wasn’t to highlight differences, then it wouldn’t be there.
>for filming a man in a dress.
it's not a dress, it's a Skant, and is as feminine as a kilt is.
>it…its not a dress!
You're such a homosexual lmao. Way to prove my point.
Okay, but it isn't a dress. Words have meanings.
>Words have meanings.
Not to leftards. That's how they can say Star Trek was always woke with a straight face.
Star Trek was always woke.
>You just don't like NuTrek because you can't fap to it, and make stupid excuses about wokeness and differences because of coomer brain.
This outlandish projection only reveals that you like the new shit nobody likes because you enjoy it only as gross fetish porn.
>Then why does she work well with her crew
>No one is highlighting differences and "getting theirs"
I guess that'll be why STD depicted white males as weak and/or arseholes from the get-go. And why Michael Burnham was arrogant, insubordinate and violent (to the point of literal mutiny) from the get-go. Everyone's equal, but some are more equal than others, eh?
>STD depicted white males as weak and/or arseholes from the get-go
Lorca was not weak, he was awesome. And Stamets was pretty cool. Not seeing where you are getting at.
>and/or
And those certainly are some opinions.
stamets is the most insufferable character after st. michael
Propaganda in the 60s
>set aside your differences, work together for the betterment of everyone
Chubs today
>but these differences are different because I say so!
"chubs" aren't the ones labelling everything and making up new genders
The only Captain who can save us.
Him winning in 2016 spawned Discovery and Picard. I cannot even begin to imagine what him winning AGAIN would do to Star Trek.
It's been leftists propaganda from the start. Original Trek forced a russian onto the bridge during the height of the cold war to show how we all should just hold hands and sing kumboyah. If that wasn't enough they decided to force an interracial makeout scene with the ships captain and the strong independent black womyn comms officer. It only got worse from there.
Cooperation was always a dignified message.
Mental illness, uggos, gross fetishes = valid isn't.
And onliy the above one is fit for a series, unless you want to cater exclusively to a minority of a minority for some reason
>Star Trek was always woke
Woke was invented about ten years ago.
Star Trek was always woke. Except for all of the problematic elements we are now censoring, ignoring or retconning.
Star Trek was always woke.
>LAL: I am gender neuter. Inadequate.
>DATA: That is why you must choose a gender, Lal, to complete your appearance.
OH NO NO NON ONO NO NONBINARYXIXTERS....
Star Trek was always woke.
It's got stuck in a loop.
That's the same person in a different body, not the same body with a "different person" in it
>That's the same person in a different body, not the same body with a "different person" in it
Let's say there was a body with a "different person" in it. If they were to somehow change their body, wouldn't they then be the same person in a different body?
No, it would still be the same body, just mutilated. Maybe I should have said "separate and distinct" instead of "different"
Oh, so you moved the goalpost, gotcha.
Nah I just clarified, I'm deeply sorry you can't keep up. I'm talking about a Dax/Trill symbiote, of course I always meant separate and distinct.
Star Trek was always woke.
>the tyrannical, imperialistic, racist, violent empire that is responsible for the death and enslavement of billions of people are akshually heckin toleranterino!
Star Trek was always woke.
>the character who wanted to be openly female is lobotimized and forced to be gender neutral
Yeah totally
Aw, he doesn't understand allegory.
The allegory was about homosexuality. Not mutilating your penis and denying gender. Aw, you're doped up on hormones.
I think in zer mind ze thinks ze's like Picard heroically insisting that there are four lights. Except in this case there are five, and I doubt ze would hold up well under torture.
(So woke the non-gendered alien Riker got involved with was played by a woman, and is recognisably feminine, eh?)
Just accept that live action star trek is dead now.
>Seven of Nine
They turned her gay? Wasn't she with Chakotay? I never watched any of the nu-trash.
Yep, they made her gay, and (moronic) in picard.
Honestly, just ignore picard, it's not canon, at least to anybody who respects star trek.
But Mike Stoklasa told me it was good!
third season was OK
>Rise of Skywalker but with TNG characters
HAHA!
No.
>Rise of Skywalker but with TNG characters
unironically kino
>Mike Stoklasa
Who?
Wow! That's a lot of gays!
I remember when liking and being a nerd for comics, star wars, star trek, anime was some obscure shit the moron in your classroom will love and everyone will bully him for it. It had his own demographic and fanbase. How the frick the lgbqtodooalwlla community hijacked everything? Like Black person im not going to your pride parade and demanding that it should be about me
star trek WAS always "woke", the difference is that it used to be woke KINO whereas now it is woke SLOP
Star Trek used to stand for truth, logic and equality.
Woke is antithetical to such things.
its funny how the terminally online STD shill just keep screaming harder and harder every day. There has to be a breaking point.
God knows what it'll do when nutrek is dead and buried
>There has to be a breaking point
Paramount is in dire straits. It has months to live.
Star Trek was always woke.
Yeah, you keep saying that. And pretending you're not implying that woke now is the same as woke then. But you are, and it isn't.
>It's "accept everyone" that changed, not me!
Sure.
It was never "accept *everyone*", and it was never "accept everyone except straight white males", so, yeah.
>Star Trek has always been wo-
And this is why we can't have /trek/ threads, because nutrek gays are mentally ill
Likewise, the Trek fandom won't heal until NuTrek is dead and people like Jessie Gender move on to other franchises.