Why is this kinda behavior fun when Cinemaphile does it, but incredibly annoying when Twitter does it?
frankly it used to be fun when Cinemaphile headcanoned a character as transgender because Cinemaphile did it in earnest, there was no agenda or political bullshit, it was just genuine theorizing like good ol times
but now it also became annoying because now Cinemaphile does it just to start outrage shit
Cinemaphile is usually jokey or the kind autistic nerd discussions. On twatter it’s a leading question to either create a circlejerk or shitstorm. It’s like shitposting only the person is actually genuine.
>i thought the show was a continuation of the movie like all movies got back then
Yes. It first started as a movie then it got its own TV series a couple of months later.
The footage we see here was a test pitch made in 2000, that's why it looks like shit. I'm not sure how Nick was convinced by this though, but then again this is early 2000s Nick, SpongeBob didn't become a huge hit yet.
That's Otis and you are gonna respect him
a female bull
Wouldn't "a male cow" be more accurate
He's trans, chud.
god i hate you people so much
rent free.
>walks into your house
>"dude get out"
>"haha rent free!"
Cinemaphile is not your house
>He can't into metaphors
I'm gonna be honest with you buddy that's a symptom of moronic
Kiss.
D-Dammit anon, now I gotta do it
A four wienered bovine
Cartoon characters are not supposed to be realistic.
Why is this kinda behavior fun when Cinemaphile does it, but incredibly annoying when Twitter does it?
Everything from Cinemaphile and Cinemaphile as a whole shouldn't be taken seriously.
frankly it used to be fun when Cinemaphile headcanoned a character as transgender because Cinemaphile did it in earnest, there was no agenda or political bullshit, it was just genuine theorizing like good ol times
but now it also became annoying because now Cinemaphile does it just to start outrage shit
Cinemaphile is usually jokey or the kind autistic nerd discussions. On twatter it’s a leading question to either create a circlejerk or shitstorm. It’s like shitposting only the person is actually genuine.
as always, the male of the species is the only gender with any interesting properties.
Since this is a barnyard thread, any thoughts on the old teaser this show had? it was supposed to be a movie
mandatory Barnyard post:
it WAS a movie, wasn't it? i thought the show was a continuation of the movie like all movies got back then
>i thought the show was a continuation of the movie like all movies got back then
Yes. It first started as a movie then it got its own TV series a couple of months later.
The footage we see here was a test pitch made in 2000, that's why it looks like shit. I'm not sure how Nick was convinced by this though, but then again this is early 2000s Nick, SpongeBob didn't become a huge hit yet.
Gross
funny as frick
Someone drew porn of the farmer once. I don't blame him.
you didn't have to tell us this yet you did.
Was... was it good?
That's up to you to decide.
https://rule34.paheal.net/post/view/4261685
>the pitchfork
What the hell, fricking kek this can't be for sexual purposes this has to be a joke.
Also
>flyover state farmer
>uncircumcised
Lol
I blame him.
freemartin
This thread is udder nonsense.
It's a kid's show
they needed to cover up his israeliteels and all they had were fake udders
that's my theory anyway
>WE ARE GONNA BE BANISHED FROM THE ANIMAL KINGDOM