a fat old boomer napoleon looking confused and flustered and shouting BLARGH FRICK OFF every 5 seconds would've been pretty funny though, more entertaining than coq au vin's sleep walk of a performance
there are a million quotes of him talking shit for some reason, apparently mostly from him memoir >In the new memoir, Cox writes that Seagal, the martial artist-turned-actor, “is as ludicrous in real life as he appears on screen. He radiates a studied serenity, as though he’s on a higher plane to the rest of us, and while he’s certainly on a different plane, no doubt about that, it’s probably not a higher one.”
>Cox finds Tarantino’s movies “meretricious,” valuing “style where there should be substance.…That said, if the phone rang, I’d do it.” Norton, meanwhile, is “a nice lad but a bit of a pain in the arse.”
There’s more: Johnny Depp, Cox writes, is “so overblown, so overrated.” And the late David Bowie was “not a particularly good actor.”
>It’s not all bad, though. Cox found Morgan Freeman to be “an absolute gentleman,” and praises the late Alan Rickman as “one of the sweetest, kindest, nicest and most incredibly smart men I’ve ever met.”
honestly kind of refreshing just to see bad acting get shit on by other actors
nowadays theyre just wholesome 100 appearing on each others podcasts with the only drama being race related
He was right that it was a wacky performance but Phoenix was just trying to kind of work with what he was given
Not only was he the right person for the role, but far more importantly, the script was absolutely fricking trash
I struggle to think of how any actor could have made it compelling
would pre-succession cox have had the nerve to say this I wonder? I mean he wasn't really a big time recognisable actor till then. I remember first seeing him in Bourne films. The accent he does is a strange mix, he still sounds Scottish even when playing Americans.
Cox is so fricking kino.
Reminder that he mogged hopkins as hannibal.
Just look at these scenes and tell me he doesn't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi3AVgzf52k
Joaquin can be a bit hit and miss.
He's terrible in Napoleon and also mary Madeleine.
I kind of see what he was trying to do in each movie, and its commendable that he tried to do something different, but his performance was to the detriment of each movie.
But what the frick ya gonna do? Ya want great ya take the risk
Probably upset that he didn't get casted as Napoleon even though he's almost 80.
a fat old boomer napoleon looking confused and flustered and shouting BLARGH FRICK OFF every 5 seconds would've been pretty funny though, more entertaining than coq au vin's sleep walk of a performance
I cant even remember him being in the film
He is a man of culture that I assume loves history if he's this mad.
naw, he's a whiny actor
there are a million quotes of him talking shit for some reason, apparently mostly from him memoir
>In the new memoir, Cox writes that Seagal, the martial artist-turned-actor, “is as ludicrous in real life as he appears on screen. He radiates a studied serenity, as though he’s on a higher plane to the rest of us, and while he’s certainly on a different plane, no doubt about that, it’s probably not a higher one.”
>Cox finds Tarantino’s movies “meretricious,” valuing “style where there should be substance.…That said, if the phone rang, I’d do it.” Norton, meanwhile, is “a nice lad but a bit of a pain in the arse.”
There’s more: Johnny Depp, Cox writes, is “so overblown, so overrated.” And the late David Bowie was “not a particularly good actor.”
>It’s not all bad, though. Cox found Morgan Freeman to be “an absolute gentleman,” and praises the late Alan Rickman as “one of the sweetest, kindest, nicest and most incredibly smart men I’ve ever met.”
just a pretentious twat trying to make himself feel more important than he is.
There's nothing pretentious about any of those quotes
>Hates reinventing chameleon artists like Depp and Bowie
>Praises one-note hack actors like Freeman and Rickman
This dumb jock boomer is peak pleb.
Heh kino. These are my opinions now.
>Joaquin...whackeen... whacky. It's sort of a whacky performance
AYOOOOO this homie got bars! He poppin OFF
honestly kind of refreshing just to see bad acting get shit on by other actors
nowadays theyre just wholesome 100 appearing on each others podcasts with the only drama being race related
He was right that it was a wacky performance but Phoenix was just trying to kind of work with what he was given
Not only was he the right person for the role, but far more importantly, the script was absolutely fricking trash
I struggle to think of how any actor could have made it compelling
L to the OG
would pre-succession cox have had the nerve to say this I wonder? I mean he wasn't really a big time recognisable actor till then. I remember first seeing him in Bourne films. The accent he does is a strange mix, he still sounds Scottish even when playing Americans.
>I mean he wasn't really a big time recognisable actor till then
For you, a casual. He killed it in supertroopers 2.
He reminds me of my grandad who 100% would have shat on Joaquin's performance. He probably would have even been heckling in the cinema.
haha oh wow! No one asked.
brian cox has 236 acting credits, he was doing ok before you recognized him sonny
>he wasn't really a big time recognisable actor till then
Maybe if you're a brainrotted cretin
He narrated the trailer for Tekken 8 you fricking pleb
Reminder Brian Cox voices McDonald's commercials and sings the "badabapaba" jingle
He’s right. Napoleon sucked and israelitequin is a one trick pony
Ridley has lost it
this is the sort of the trash brian cox starred in compared to johnny lol
he should keep his mouth shut
X2 is Kino, and miles better than Napoleon.
>X-Men 2
>trash
Frick zoomers.
i'm 48
it's trash
Having a funny surname
>Embarrassing like back in '77 when you got caught frickin' your cousin
That flick just sucked balls overall. Bad performances, terrible casting, nonsensical plot, dumbass writing
Nothing, he's right. Every aspect of the movie was shit.
I didnt see it but as soon as i read whacky i know exactly what he means.
More like Joaqout
At Water Loo, Nappy did surrender.
Cox is so fricking kino.
Reminder that he mogged hopkins as hannibal.
Just look at these scenes and tell me he doesn't. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zi3AVgzf52k
Very different goals with each performance. Cox is 'believable' highly intelligent psychopath, Hopkins is book-accurate actual mutant. Both very good
I look forward to becoming old and far enough along in my career that I can start shitting on colleagues with zero concern for repercussions
Joaquin can be a bit hit and miss.
He's terrible in Napoleon and also mary Madeleine.
I kind of see what he was trying to do in each movie, and its commendable that he tried to do something different, but his performance was to the detriment of each movie.
But what the frick ya gonna do? Ya want great ya take the risk
ok boomer
>"I cannot sanction your buffoonery"