Please just frick off forever Paul, and take your freakishly ugly wife and nepobaby daughter with you. Preferably onto a yacht which then sinks with all hands.
She's not only your medieval era battle commander, but a successful one that arguably was a big part in turning the tide in a decades long war that saved your country.
If I was a french soldier serving under her, I'd be rock hard as soon as I was in a 50m radius of her even if she was a 5/10.
If you don't want to frick Joan of Arc in that scenario, you are a homosexual.
Jeanne is canonically very pretty
Her descendant should have been a much better cast than this slavic boy
Look at his Russian soldier getting chased by a FPV drone looking ass
Go to the gym b***h breasts homie, I've seen college girls deadlift 150kg like its nothing (thats like a million in burger units)
>the full plate armor was like 65-75 lbs
you're taking the Average, but a suit of armor is tailored entirely to 1 individual. Someone wearing a suit made for someone else just wouldn't fit. If she had a suit of armor it must've been considerably lighter for her build
I hate this question so much, because it completely misses the point of her contribution, whatever that was. Let's say she was just a glorified cheerleader, fine. Without her, France was fricked. Whatever her role was, that's what they needed. Look at the state of the conflict at the point Joan enters the scene. The french are dead on their feet. You can say that she didn't really do any fighting, you can say that she blundered and lucked her way to a few victories, you can say that she got help every step of the way. Whatever. Without her as a unifying figure, her passion, her devotion to the cause, her blind faith in victory and complete and utter loyalty to her country and her king, France was doomed. Who cares if she actually stabbed anyone to death or not?
Did Joan actually do anything or was she like a mascot?
seems like a pretty basic question. rhetorical question really since we know what the answer is. its brought up because its annoying seeing feminists and Hollywood act like she was some badass knight fighting people
so no, she did not fight people. its not a serious debate
>she did not fight people. its not a serious debate
There is some debate. We know that she operated on the front lines and sustained injuries therein. It is possible she killed people.
Literally everything you said is wrong. I can promise you that Hollywood and feminists are not fans of a woman who literally gave her life fighting for her country and believed she was on a divine mission.
I hate this question so much, because it completely misses the point of her contribution, whatever that was. Let's say she was just a glorified cheerleader, fine. Without her, France was fricked. Whatever her role was, that's what they needed. Look at the state of the conflict at the point Joan enters the scene. The french are dead on their feet. You can say that she didn't really do any fighting, you can say that she blundered and lucked her way to a few victories, you can say that she got help every step of the way. Whatever. Without her as a unifying figure, her passion, her devotion to the cause, her blind faith in victory and complete and utter loyalty to her country and her king, France was doomed. Who cares if she actually stabbed anyone to death or not?
[...]
seems like a pretty basic question. rhetorical question really since we know what the answer is. its brought up because its annoying seeing feminists and hollywood act like she was some badass knight fighting people
so no, she did not fight people. its not a serious debate
French here, we know she was in the front lines and got wounded (one of her followers got a boner while treating her wounds) so shut the frick up
There is also another Jeanne who fought English soldiers with a hand axe,causing two to surrender/flee and chopped down their banner during a siege
>Ok so this person was wearing full armor and was armed in the middle of a battle and even got wounded but I REFUSE to believe she swinged her sword or ran someone over with her horse because of identity politics of XXI america
Shut the frick up fatty you're making French history about yourself
Jeanne has nothing to do with your game gate, sjws, etc you stupid cultureless slob go get in debt to "maxx out my credit" you door dash abusing monkey dont forget to tip or you'll get shot
she was a glorified mascot and depictions of her as a man-at-arms in full harness are ahistorical nonsense. Stop trying to excuse lies about history because you link it to culture war bullshit.
Why would we be mad? You frogs were the ones who burned her.
Or are you one of those people who's successfully scrubbed the word "Burgundian" from your history books?
Heretic fake Saint that was only canonised because of Napoleon's machinations (encouraging the cult around her for French nationalistic purposes) - as in she was dead centuries until she was dragged up and canonised in 1920, literally almost FIVE CENTURIES AFTER HER DEATH. In the process of examining her life the college of Cardinals rejected that she was sent by God, but politics and money talks and the corrupt Catholic Church proclaimed another fake Saint. She did not fight on the front lines nor plan battle strategy, she was a little peasant girl whose claims of religious visions and her strong belief motivated the soldiers she preached to and became a symbol during the war. She made a couple of famous blunders and the French commanders wisely ignored the advice of a silly little girl - perhaps if they had taken her more seriously they would have been routed by the English following her 'God given commands'.
Perhaps the worst part of all this is the Coomers that want to jack off to this supposed 'Saint.'.
Oh, and also, she is now claimed as a troony icon, a fitting end for her I suppose.
>be french town >under siege >besieging and defending armies pretty evenly matched >moronic girl comes in >"hey, random peasants. why don't we all just attack the besieging army en masse and act as a dirty peasant meat shield for our professional army?" >peasants: YEAH!! I FRICKING LOVE GOD AND LITTLE GIRLS!!!
and that's how france beat the british
>still mad about losing a war to a peasant girl 600 years ago
get over it nigel you're not even catholic
THE DEVIL IS ROME.....and France. I'm actually Scottish so technically my ancestors were on the French side as part of the Auld Alliance, so I lost nothing.
Joan of Arc was beautiful. Men followed her because a nice pair of breasts and ass is very inspiring. If she looked like that nobody would have followed her into battle.
>glorified army garrison bicycle
Her divine purpose was to be a wet hole as god has intended for women to be, she was there to be passed around the camp like a cum rag (sometimes hundred times per day) and be happy about it. The whole i talk to the god thing was her being delirious after spending whole day with all her holes stuffed balls deep.
>sexy
homosexualry runs rampant in this board. I blame the underground hebrews.
>If you are not in to ugly bulldyke you are gay
Kys.
You gay Black person
She's pretty, but small breasts/ass just doesn't activate my neurons.
She has a bad case of Manface
Also not dusk colored. 2024 was a mistake.
Imagine prime Milla with bolt-ons. Unghhhh
Please just frick off forever Paul, and take your freakishly ugly wife and nepobaby daughter with you. Preferably onto a yacht which then sinks with all hands.
She's not only your medieval era battle commander, but a successful one that arguably was a big part in turning the tide in a decades long war that saved your country.
If I was a french soldier serving under her, I'd be rock hard as soon as I was in a 50m radius of her even if she was a 5/10.
If you don't want to frick Joan of Arc in that scenario, you are a homosexual.
>I want to defile our savior
Disgusting. This is your brain fried by porn.
didn't ask moron
I'd frick her
Convincing everyone that Milla Jovovich was attractive is the greatest trick the devil ever pulled
>Joan of ACK
simple jack of arc
the full plate armor was like 65-75 lbs, not counting weapons
realistically no woman would be able to wear it for a longer period of time
Only mounted knights wore full plate.
Knights fought on foot too and still wore full plate. There are some examples that are obviously designed for foot combat.
I'd mount her
Joan of arc did wear war full plate armor though, at least on horseback. It’s literally in the legal records of her trial by the English
But full plate armor is supposed be be easy to wear cause the weight is distributed over your body
She did.
America female soldiers were wearing gear 95-115 lbs in Iraq.
Women can tank up
Jeanne is canonically very pretty
Her descendant should have been a much better cast than this slavic boy
Look at his Russian soldier getting chased by a FPV drone looking ass
Go to the gym b***h breasts homie, I've seen college girls deadlift 150kg like its nothing (thats like a million in burger units)
>I've seen college girls
you haven't, and if you have check under their skirt anon, you may be shocked
>the full plate armor was like 65-75 lbs
you're taking the Average, but a suit of armor is tailored entirely to 1 individual. Someone wearing a suit made for someone else just wouldn't fit. If she had a suit of armor it must've been considerably lighter for her build
No it was not, it was around 40lbs on average, and thats equally distributed across your entire body.
I wish she'd turn around so we could see her.
Both the silent version and the 1940s version are better
One of my favourite Jean of Arc movies.
frick shit fart puke b***h wiener balls c**t bawd ass crap hell
Did Joan actually do anything or was she like a mascot?
I hate this question so much, because it completely misses the point of her contribution, whatever that was. Let's say she was just a glorified cheerleader, fine. Without her, France was fricked. Whatever her role was, that's what they needed. Look at the state of the conflict at the point Joan enters the scene. The french are dead on their feet. You can say that she didn't really do any fighting, you can say that she blundered and lucked her way to a few victories, you can say that she got help every step of the way. Whatever. Without her as a unifying figure, her passion, her devotion to the cause, her blind faith in victory and complete and utter loyalty to her country and her king, France was doomed. Who cares if she actually stabbed anyone to death or not?
seems like a pretty basic question. rhetorical question really since we know what the answer is. its brought up because its annoying seeing feminists and Hollywood act like she was some badass knight fighting people
so no, she did not fight people. its not a serious debate
>she did not fight people. its not a serious debate
There is some debate. We know that she operated on the front lines and sustained injuries therein. It is possible she killed people.
Literally everything you said is wrong. I can promise you that Hollywood and feminists are not fans of a woman who literally gave her life fighting for her country and believed she was on a divine mission.
French here, we know she was in the front lines and got wounded (one of her followers got a boner while treating her wounds) so shut the frick up
There is also another Jeanne who fought English soldiers with a hand axe,causing two to surrender/flee and chopped down their banner during a siege
getting wounded while being a cheerleader (or not) is not proof of anything. the debate isnt if she was ever present for battles you dumb algerian
>Ok so this person was wearing full armor and was armed in the middle of a battle and even got wounded but I REFUSE to believe she swinged her sword or ran someone over with her horse because of identity politics of XXI america
Shut the frick up fatty you're making French history about yourself
Jeanne has nothing to do with your game gate, sjws, etc you stupid cultureless slob go get in debt to "maxx out my credit" you door dash abusing monkey dont forget to tip or you'll get shot
>you door dash abusing monkey dont forget to tip or you'll get shot
Kek, based French Anon
France is literally an African colony anon
she was a glorified mascot and depictions of her as a man-at-arms in full harness are ahistorical nonsense. Stop trying to excuse lies about history because you link it to culture war bullshit.
Based
Incels who make everything about their woman-hating must burn
>God sends you a warrior that will guide you to victory
>french: let's burn her
They deserved to lose
She didn't look like like a Russian-Serb israelitemutt
Do you think she came when the bongs raped her before burning her?
100%, women all have rape fetishes.
The Joan of arc from bill and ted's excellent adventure is the prettiest one.
Best Joan of Arc
wait a second, God, the omnipotent creator of the universe, was backing the French in their conflict with the British?
how was this fair for the British in any way?
She was psychotic, God was not involved
proof?
>Anglos are still mad at jeanne all those centuries later.
Kek this will never cease to be funny.
Why would we be mad? You frogs were the ones who burned her.
Or are you one of those people who's successfully scrubbed the word "Burgundian" from your history books?
>Why would we be mad? Followed by anglos rambling
kek
Heretic fake Saint that was only canonised because of Napoleon's machinations (encouraging the cult around her for French nationalistic purposes) - as in she was dead centuries until she was dragged up and canonised in 1920, literally almost FIVE CENTURIES AFTER HER DEATH. In the process of examining her life the college of Cardinals rejected that she was sent by God, but politics and money talks and the corrupt Catholic Church proclaimed another fake Saint. She did not fight on the front lines nor plan battle strategy, she was a little peasant girl whose claims of religious visions and her strong belief motivated the soldiers she preached to and became a symbol during the war. She made a couple of famous blunders and the French commanders wisely ignored the advice of a silly little girl - perhaps if they had taken her more seriously they would have been routed by the English following her 'God given commands'.
Perhaps the worst part of all this is the Coomers that want to jack off to this supposed 'Saint.'.
Oh, and also, she is now claimed as a troony icon, a fitting end for her I suppose.
AND YES, I AM VERY BRITISH, WHY DO YOU ASK?
>still mad about losing a war to a peasant girl 600 years ago
get over it nigel you're not even catholic
>be french town
>under siege
>besieging and defending armies pretty evenly matched
>moronic girl comes in
>"hey, random peasants. why don't we all just attack the besieging army en masse and act as a dirty peasant meat shield for our professional army?"
>peasants: YEAH!! I FRICKING LOVE GOD AND LITTLE GIRLS!!!
and that's how france beat the british
joan is supposed to be pretty and a teenager
just another role stolen from deserving hebe girls and given to the weinstein-pleaser roasties
lol
THE DEVIL IS ROME.....and France. I'm actually Scottish so technically my ancestors were on the French side as part of the Auld Alliance, so I lost nothing.
>I'm actually Scottish
Says Nigelhg McAnglohg 50% danish 50% English
West Coast Islands so try Norwegian.
French homosexual.
Post her daughter before I piss meself
Kino movie, back when Milla could act.
Sword in a field.
Joan of Arc was beautiful. Men followed her because a nice pair of breasts and ass is very inspiring. If she looked like that nobody would have followed her into battle.
What's that unfunny israelite from snl/unfunny cop show doing here
>glorified army garrison bicycle
Her divine purpose was to be a wet hole as god has intended for women to be, she was there to be passed around the camp like a cum rag (sometimes hundred times per day) and be happy about it. The whole i talk to the god thing was her being delirious after spending whole day with all her holes stuffed balls deep.
this is the god fearing christian i was telling you about