They should have figured out that animating that way was a guaranteed disaster for a feature length movie.
I would have been more than happy to see a finished product with less frames as far as the 3D portions and aesthetic was the same.
Or at least reserve the high framerate for certain characters.
>I would have been more than happy to see a finished product with less frames as far as the 3D portions and aesthetic was the same.
I can see the production in the studio now >Just one more frame, one more frame bro >It's gonna be fluid, just one more frame >The budget can handle it just one more frame
>Telling a story was never the goal.
Which sadly is the worst choice you could make with these kinds of things. You NEED not only a good story but good storytelling along with it to invest the audience, otherwise the "pinnacle of animation" will be seen as a cool animation project not really worth rewatching until its upstaged by a later one that does it better.
>Year is 1988 >Richard Williams: *btfo disney with his awesome roger rabbit animation on ones* >disney, realizing they now have to put more effort into their own animations to keep up with Richard Williams: "OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN" >disney, knowing that they will get btfo by The Thief and the Cobbler: *pays Warner Bros in shekels to shut it down*
Alright, now we've got a problem. I can't tell if Cobbler-gay (yes, that's what we've dubbed you, OP) and this new moron spamming his Keith The Goblin OC everywhere is one in the same. This is just too much 'tism in one fricking thread if you are two separate people.
What the frick does your goblin actually have to do with Cinemaphile? And before you say it, advertising it here doesn't mean is associated with the site or it's culture.
no pusi
Lack of funding
he's blue
Should've been silent.
why?
2 dimensional villain in a 2 dimensional boring movie.
card tricks
He was quite awake
He had more frames than he could afford
no why was he so evil
They should have figured out that animating that way was a guaranteed disaster for a feature length movie.
I would have been more than happy to see a finished product with less frames as far as the 3D portions and aesthetic was the same.
Or at least reserve the high framerate for certain characters.
>I would have been more than happy to see a finished product with less frames as far as the 3D portions and aesthetic was the same.
I can see the production in the studio now
>Just one more frame, one more frame bro
>It's gonna be fluid, just one more frame
>The budget can handle it just one more frame
The project was far too ambitious for its period and budget and the fact nobody had the balls to tell Williams that always baffles me.
Were the scenes that got finished gorgeous? Yes, but holy shit, they were unsustainable as shit.
That wasn't the point. This was meant to be the pinnacle of animation, a showcase of what the craft could do. Telling a story was never the goal.
>Telling a story was never the goal.
Which sadly is the worst choice you could make with these kinds of things. You NEED not only a good story but good storytelling along with it to invest the audience, otherwise the "pinnacle of animation" will be seen as a cool animation project not really worth rewatching until its upstaged by a later one that does it better.
Name a single movie that came out after it that has better animation
zugzug
Zigger
GILCHRIST!!!
He was genie's less handsomw younger brother
Animating on ones doesn't leave much attention or budget for writing.
>Year is 1988
>Richard Williams: *btfo disney with his awesome roger rabbit animation on ones*
>disney, realizing they now have to put more effort into their own animations to keep up with Richard Williams: "OY VEY SHUT IT DOWN"
>disney, knowing that they will get btfo by The Thief and the Cobbler: *pays Warner Bros in shekels to shut it down*
Alright, now we've got a problem. I can't tell if Cobbler-gay (yes, that's what we've dubbed you, OP) and this new moron spamming his Keith The Goblin OC everywhere is one in the same. This is just too much 'tism in one fricking thread if you are two separate people.
how about you come up with a better Cinemaphile character then huh?
What the frick does your goblin actually have to do with Cinemaphile? And before you say it, advertising it here doesn't mean is associated with the site or it's culture.
Sheer fricking stupidity
I wonder if that cuphead saltshaker boss has any references to this