I like the implication this has of Warburton being the "canon" voice of Buzz and Allen is the "whatever intern we could get to record the lines for the dumb toy".
An anonymous insider reports that Tim Allen once said he probably would not support a program to hook up all Americans to an MRI scanner to determine their stance on abortion and execute pro-lifers. For this reason it would be abhorrent for Disney to continue to work with him; he cannot be counted on to stand up for the basic human rights of women, and probably has several rapes (maybe child rapes?) under his belt, seeing as he is such a misogynist.
there are 2 version of the star command movie, one has warburton and one has tim allen, with the series obviously containing warburton, i think using tim allen shit is stupid because for the majority of that series, product line, and concept of blosc it was warburton, pixar is just too big of gays to use that concept cuz john misconduct thought it was stupid and tropey, BUT THE CONCEPT OF BUZZ WAS FRICKING TROPEY!
>An anonymous insider reports that Tim Allen once said he probably would not support a program to hook up all Americans to an MRI scanner to determine their stance on abortion and execute pro-lifers.
Literally what the frick am I reading?
You're really missing they point. It's a continuum of life. You're the kind of person that thinks demographic groups are as meaningful as species or something. A fetus, a baby, a teen, a senior is a human. Stop being obtuse, you ass.
2 years ago
Anonymous
>It's a continuum of life.
So is sperm so you would have to ban masturbation since that's potential life being snuffed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Actually no. Sperm by itself will always be sperm, same with an ovum. Neither have any unique genetic code as it's nothing more than half of one's genetic code. Saying a sperm cell is a human is like saying a 2x4 on it's own is a patio.
Pixar was Disney's b***h at the time because they were trying to negotiate their way out of a good but very limiting distribution agreement with them (this was when Steve Jobs owned Pixar and not Disney).
Allowing a spinoff like this is really the least Pixar could have done given Disney renegotiating their contract to be better for them after Toy Story's success.
There's nothing wrong with it, but how many people are going to remember a somewhat obscure cartoon from 22 years ago? 99% of the young generation have never even seen this cartoon, & even among millennials, it had only a medium level of popularity.
they must have been homosexuals who thought way way way too highly of the IP.
like the character was "too good" for a regular saturday morning cartoon or some shit like pixar didn't move merch by metric frick-ton with even ONE frickin' movie under their belt.
I miss when cartoons were fun, man
Hearing that the movie is underperforming is the best god damn news I've heard all year. One day I hope Disney will bring back XR, Booster and Mira. One day.
another anon posted this week some screencaps from a de-pixelation he did for some of the episodes. I personally appreciated the effort, but it result in the usual problems from these automated rendering
yeah I saw that too but the sources he was working from didn't look nearly as good as this screenshot and there was talk of a better source being "lost".
Because it's extremely obvious when they do it, and almost a guarantee that whatever show they're shielding with minorities will be shit.
Usually it's not the token character in-and-of themselves that makes a movie or show bad, it's that as soon as you see one you JUST KNOW the company who made the movie or show is going to do the old: >Release cringe inducing preview >Preemptively dogwhistle about racists >Movie or show drops and is bad >Flops >Circle back around to everyone who didn't enjoy their bad writing is actually a racist >Rinse >Repeat
John Lasseter had beef with the studio who made it because they also made those god-awful direct to DVD Disney sequels that he felt were damaging the legacy of the original movies.
I mean, there are cartoons that got made from movies that are not all that similar to the movie they are supposed to be based on. Like Ghostbusters and MIB. If Lightyear is the “live action” movie, then the animated series can be its own thing that tries to draw a broader crowd to sell toys. The stupid thing is that they advertise it as the movie is the reason Andy loves Buzz, whereas in the more likely case he loves Buzz from the cartoon instead.
Godzilla 1998 isn't that bad. The only people it pissed off are huge nerds who grew up watching the dorky 1970s Godzilla movies, which is a vocal minority. Godzilla has always been a niche franchise, and even the Legendary films all underperformed or flopped.
Lasseter hated the idea of Disney TV Animation playing with his toys in a way he didn't imagine. Then when Disney bought Pixar, they gave the fat autist way too much power.
The show has it's issues but it also has it's moments, if you have the interest and the time to spend watching an old Toy Story cartoon then you will have some fun.
This clip is great https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FEn-W7OBuIo
It was one of those shows that fetishists vocally attached to right as the internet went mainsteam so that could be an aspect. I don't know how fricking Gravitina accomplished that but it's there and the sight is rotting in my brain matter.
This was around the same time Disney almost took Toy Story away and made a DTV sequel without Pixar. So this brings back bad memories of that whole era for Pixar in general.
Meanwhile, Lasseter wanted a Buzz cartoon to be serious and played straight.
could you do it better Cinemaphile?
needs Funky Mode and Featuring Dante logos
it's all coming together
& KNUCKLES
Wasn't Buzz voiced by the Lemony Snicket guy from the Netflix show in this?
Allen played him in the pilot.
Warburton was always Buzz in the show. The DTV movie overdubbed him with Allen.
The movie is what I meant by pilot
The "movie" was the first three episodes glued together into one. They still ran as separate parts in syndication as they were supposed to.
You break my heart
I like the implication this has of Warburton being the "canon" voice of Buzz and Allen is the "whatever intern we could get to record the lines for the dumb toy".
if he redubbed the tv movie it's more of a celebrity endorsement thing.
TV movie isn't canon.
says who
Me.
I actually really liked Warburton as Buzz. He really played it in a way that was machismo yet heroic.
The voice cast in general was top notch.
It was good, which is unacceptable.
No, it was a great show. It was far more believable as the series Andy saw.
The final confrontation with zurg was weak. Like they ran out of time and money
I thought it was good. Zurg isn’t going to risk it all in a final showdown with Buzz, he’s going to escape and try to keep his plan going.
I would have moved this scene to the movie https://youtu.be/vdt2h37HJy4
Why didn't he have hundreds of thousands of hornets on his planet just converge on the tower and kill Buzz?
No fricking clue. Maybe because it's not "Pixar quality" read that as not in cg .
Good point. Maybe it was too normal or too kiddy stuff.
No Pixar dramamedy
Hopefully people will hate the Neobuzz so much they will vindicate this movie and series.
>He doesn't know about the allegations
>>He doesn't know about the allegations
Speak, moron
An anonymous insider reports that Tim Allen once said he probably would not support a program to hook up all Americans to an MRI scanner to determine their stance on abortion and execute pro-lifers. For this reason it would be abhorrent for Disney to continue to work with him; he cannot be counted on to stand up for the basic human rights of women, and probably has several rapes (maybe child rapes?) under his belt, seeing as he is such a misogynist.
Based guy if true
Ok but..Tim Allen didn't do the voice on the cartoon. It was Patrick waburton.
there are 2 version of the star command movie, one has warburton and one has tim allen, with the series obviously containing warburton, i think using tim allen shit is stupid because for the majority of that series, product line, and concept of blosc it was warburton, pixar is just too big of gays to use that concept cuz john misconduct thought it was stupid and tropey, BUT THE CONCEPT OF BUZZ WAS FRICKING TROPEY!
Tim Allen cut was more Disney wanting to sell more videos/DVDs then Lasseter autism.
Am I living in Deus Ex? What do you mean " MRI scanner to determine their stance on abortion."
>An anonymous insider reports that Tim Allen once said he probably would not support a program to hook up all Americans to an MRI scanner to determine their stance on abortion and execute pro-lifers.
Literally what the frick am I reading?
Sad part is, it took me a bit to figure out if this was bait or not. Frickin clown world.
Based schizo.
>basic human rights of women
Women don't have the right to kill their children, frick off baby killer.
It's not a baby, it's a fetus.
Fetus is literally defined as a human baby...
You're really missing they point. It's a continuum of life. You're the kind of person that thinks demographic groups are as meaningful as species or something. A fetus, a baby, a teen, a senior is a human. Stop being obtuse, you ass.
>It's a continuum of life.
So is sperm so you would have to ban masturbation since that's potential life being snuffed.
Actually no. Sperm by itself will always be sperm, same with an ovum. Neither have any unique genetic code as it's nothing more than half of one's genetic code. Saying a sperm cell is a human is like saying a 2x4 on it's own is a patio.
>Women don't have the right to kill their children
Yeah, that's reserved for the classroom.
>An anonymous insider
Done right there.
Patrick Warburton
It is meant to sell toys and action figures and it succeeded in that.
It was a relic of Michael Eisner's reign of terror.
Eisner's highs are astronomical, though. Sure, his lows are bad but modern Disney got built under his tenure.
give buzz the American Kirby treatment
It’s perfect
John didn't like it (because Toy Story was his creation and he didn't like the idea of Disney using it for other reasons)
Pixar was Disney's b***h at the time because they were trying to negotiate their way out of a good but very limiting distribution agreement with them (this was when Steve Jobs owned Pixar and not Disney).
Allowing a spinoff like this is really the least Pixar could have done given Disney renegotiating their contract to be better for them after Toy Story's success.
There's nothing wrong with it, but how many people are going to remember a somewhat obscure cartoon from 22 years ago? 99% of the young generation have never even seen this cartoon, & even among millennials, it had only a medium level of popularity.
UPN owns the home distribution rights and Mattel owns the character design rights.
I don't think this is true, though. Such a deal with Disney is unprecendented.
Who the hell owned UPN? Viacom?
Under Paramount, based on the name, and that became CW
mfw every episode has a different Buzz gag to the intro its the little things man.
God this rocks, nice to see this again after so long.
Please tell me there's a show running currently that does something like this that isn't The Simpsons. Intro gags are always great.
Bob's burgers
I usually only ever saw the one where Buzz overshoots the landing and smacks into the TV.
they must have been homosexuals who thought way way way too highly of the IP.
like the character was "too good" for a regular saturday morning cartoon or some shit like pixar didn't move merch by metric frick-ton with even ONE frickin' movie under their belt.
I miss when cartoons were fun, man
Hearing that the movie is underperforming is the best god damn news I've heard all year. One day I hope Disney will bring back XR, Booster and Mira. One day.
Quality of that image is pretty good, better than the TV-rips. Sauce?
another anon posted this week some screencaps from a de-pixelation he did for some of the episodes. I personally appreciated the effort, but it result in the usual problems from these automated rendering
yeah I saw that too but the sources he was working from didn't look nearly as good as this screenshot and there was talk of a better source being "lost".
>One day I hope Disney will bring back XR, Booster and Mira. One day.
That's a fricking monkey's paw if I've ever heard one.
Unfortunately the narrative is going to be that it failed because of a gay kiss so that's going to be the only issue focused on.
I'm getting really fricking tired of companies using minorities as a shield.
They get away with it because that's what people make the most noise about.
Because it's extremely obvious when they do it, and almost a guarantee that whatever show they're shielding with minorities will be shit.
Usually it's not the token character in-and-of themselves that makes a movie or show bad, it's that as soon as you see one you JUST KNOW the company who made the movie or show is going to do the old:
>Release cringe inducing preview
>Preemptively dogwhistle about racists
>Movie or show drops and is bad
>Flops
>Circle back around to everyone who didn't enjoy their bad writing is actually a racist
>Rinse
>Repeat
You're just playing right into their hands.
John Lasseter had beef with the studio who made it because they also made those god-awful direct to DVD Disney sequels that he felt were damaging the legacy of the original movies.
It was amazing, seriously cool.
Scratched my itch for cheesy space action adventure.
I remember it fondly.
I mean, there are cartoons that got made from movies that are not all that similar to the movie they are supposed to be based on. Like Ghostbusters and MIB. If Lightyear is the “live action” movie, then the animated series can be its own thing that tries to draw a broader crowd to sell toys. The stupid thing is that they advertise it as the movie is the reason Andy loves Buzz, whereas in the more likely case he loves Buzz from the cartoon instead.
>he loves Buzz from the cartoon instead.
This. In my headcanon, Andy never watched the movie, he only watched the show.
I bet it's like Godzilla the Series where most people hated the 1998 movie but loved the cartoon
The movie was ok.
Godzilla 1998 isn't that bad. The only people it pissed off are huge nerds who grew up watching the dorky 1970s Godzilla movies, which is a vocal minority. Godzilla has always been a niche franchise, and even the Legendary films all underperformed or flopped.
nah, the japanese hated it too. they made a movie just to dab on that american zilla
Lasseter hated the idea of Disney TV Animation playing with his toys in a way he didn't imagine. Then when Disney bought Pixar, they gave the fat autist way too much power.
Tbf said fat autist gave them a lot of money with Cars. But he’s gone so what the frick, Disney?
Disney really shit on their TV cartoon spinoffs
Except Clone Wars, the one I hated. There's no justice in the world.
Too fun, not enough woke lesbians.
Pixar would crumble before being tied to anything that isn't 3D
The show has it's issues but it also has it's moments, if you have the interest and the time to spend watching an old Toy Story cartoon then you will have some fun.
This clip is great https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FEn-W7OBuIo
I liked almost everything except Wayne Knight's Zurg. Too comedic.
I thought this originally but he grew on me
It fits the tone of the show but if they'd actually made Lightyear more like the cartoon I would've liked a more serious Zurg at least.
Just post Mira erotica and shut up.
It was one of those shows that fetishists vocally attached to right as the internet went mainsteam so that could be an aspect. I don't know how fricking Gravitina accomplished that but it's there and the sight is rotting in my brain matter.
Putting someone in your brain isn't a fetish. Vore is a fetish.
How many times are you going to make this thread? You've gotten the answer in every single one, so there is absolutely no need to ever ask again.
competent white male
This was around the same time Disney almost took Toy Story away and made a DTV sequel without Pixar. So this brings back bad memories of that whole era for Pixar in general.
Meanwhile, Lasseter wanted a Buzz cartoon to be serious and played straight.